Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 5 of 5
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_10 | Pages 118 - 118
1 May 2016
Walker P Arno S Borukhov I Bell C Salvadore G
Full Access

Introduction

The major function of the medial meniscus has been shown to be distribution of the load with reduction of cartilage stresses, while its role in AP stability has been found to be secondary. However several recent studies have shown that cartilage loss in OA occurs in the central region of the tibia while the meniscus is displaced medially. In a lab study (Arno, Hadley 2013) it was confirmed that the AP laxity was greatly reduced with a compressive force across the knee, while the femur shifted posteriorly and the AP laxity was increased after a partial meniscetomy of the posterior horn. It is therefore possible that under load, the compression of the meniscus and the cartilage, 2–3mm in total, allows load transmission on the central tibial plateau, and causes radial expansion and tension of the meniscus providing restraint to femoral displacements. This leads to our hypotheses that the highest loading on the medial meniscus would be at the extremes of motion, rather than in the mid-range, and that the meniscus would provide the majority of the restraint to anterior-posterior femoral displacements throughout flexion when compressive loads were acting.

Methods & Materials

MRI scans were taken of ten knee specimens to verify the absence of pathology and produce computer models. The knees were loaded in combinations of compressive and shear loading over a full flexion range. Tekscan sensors were used to measure the pressure distribution across the joint as the knee was flexed continuously. A digital camera was used to track the motion, from which femoral-tibial contacts were determined by computer modelling. Load transmission was determined from the Tekscan for the anterior horn, central body, posterior horn, and the uncovered cartilage in the center of the meniscus. An analysis was carried out (Fig 2) to determine the net anterior or posterior shear force carried by the meniscus.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_4 | Pages 110 - 110
1 Jan 2016
Walker P Lowry M Arno S Borukhov I Bell C
Full Access

Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA), has now become a reliable, successful, and widely used treatment for osteoarthritis. Numerous reports indicate that for the majority of patients, the TKA lasts a lifetime with pain relief and the ability to perform most everyday activities. However there are a number of ways in which the procedure can be further improved, the focus here being on function. One of the problems in evaluating function is that it depends upon the inherent ability, motivation, and expectation of the patients. There are several well-used questionnaire systems which capture functional ability objectively. In the effort to simplify evaluation, a ‘forgotten knee’ evaluation has been introduced, the concept being that ‘the ideal TKA design’ would feel and function like a normal knee. Such a measure would include factors such as surgical technique, alignment, and rehabilitation, as well as the TKA design itself. Another approach to evaluation is to measure biomechanical parameters, such as in gait analysis and fluoroscopy, which evaluate kinematic or kinematic parameters, using normal controls for comparison. Nevertheless, such evaluations still include factors other than the TKA design itself, and do not apply to new designs.

The approach taken here for the evaluation of a new TKA design independent of other factors, is to measure the neutral path of motion and the laxity boundaries of the loaded knee on the application of shear and torque over a full range of flexion. The benchmark is the same kinematic data from the normal intact knee. The rationale has some analogy to the ‘forgotten knee’ in that if the laxity response of a design of TKA is the same as that of the anatomic knee itself, the behavior of that implanted knee in any functional condition will be indistinguishable from that of the anatomic knee itself. Such a testing concept has some similarities to the constraint test described in the ASTM standard. In this paper, a novel design algorithm is proposed for creating different design concepts. First, a general morphological form is formulated for each design concept, a Cam-Post PS, a Saddle-Ramp, and a Converging Condyle, all with overall anatomic-like surfaces. Each femoral component is then designed, which is then moved through the normal neutral path and laxity paths, which creates the tibial surface. The concepts are evaluated using a Desktop Knee Machine configured to move the knee dynamically through full flexion while applying combinations of compression, shear and torque; kinematic data being captured optically and plotted using custom software. The normal benchmark was obtained from 10 normal knee specimens, which showed the restraint of the medial femoral condyle to anterior displacement and the overall rollback and laxity laterally. Compared with standard CR and PS designs, the Guided Motion designs were seen to more closely resemble normal. It is proposed that this approach can result in designs which will more likely reproduce a ‘forgotten knee’ and achieve the optimal function for a given patient.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_34 | Pages 304 - 304
1 Dec 2013
Arno S Fetto J Bell C Papadopoulos K Walker P
Full Access

INTRODUCTION:

The purpose of this study was to determine if a short femoral stem (Lima Corporate, Udine, Italy) would result in a strain distribution which mimicked the intact bone better than a traditional length stem, thereby eliminating the potential for stress-shielding.

METHODS:

A 2 mm thick moldable plastic (PL-1, Vishay Micromeasurements, Raleigh, NC) was contoured to six fourth-generation composite femoral bones (Pacific Research Laboratories, Vashon, WA). The intact femurs were then loaded (82 kg) in a rig which simulated mid-stance single limb support phase of gait (Figure 1). During testing, the femurs were viewed and video recorded through a model 031 reflection polariscope. Observing the photoelastic coating through the polariscope, a series of fringes could be seen, which represented the difference in principal strain along the femur. The fringes were quantified using Fringe Order, N, as per the manufacturers technical notes. In order to analyze the strain distribution, the femur was separated into 6 zones, 3 lateral and 3 medial, and the maximum fringe order determined. Upon completion of testing of the intact femur, the short length femoral stem was inserted and tested, and finally the traditional length femoral stem was inserted and tested. Anterior and lateral radiographs were obtained of the femur with each femoral stem in order to confirm proper alignment.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_IV | Pages 406 - 407
1 Nov 2011
Walker S Yildirim G Arno S
Full Access

The treatment of osteoarthritis using artificial knee joints is expected to expand further over the next decade. Increasingly, patients expect quicker rehabilitation, improved performance, and high durability. However, economic limitations require a reduced cost for each procedure, as well as early intervention and even preventative measures. The major goal of implant design needs to be a restoration of normal knee mechanics, whether by maximum preservation of tissues, or by guiding surfaces which replicate their function. In this paper it is proposed that total knees should exhibit anatomic knee mechanics, namely medial stability – lateral mobility.

Many studies in the past have shown that the neutral path of motion of the anatomic knee, is that the medial side remains relatively immobile in the AP direction, which will impart a feeling of stability, while the lateral side shows posterior femoral displacement with flexion, to obtain a high range of flexion. There is considerable rotational laxity about this neutral path to accommodate a range of positions and activities. Recent studies carried out in our laboratory using an up-and-down crouching machine, and other test machines, have conformed this mechanical behaviour. To further elaborate, we tested eight young male subjects in a 7T MRI machine, where compressive and shear loads were applied. AP displacements occurred laterally but not medially. We attributed this behaviour to the medial meniscus and the tibial bearing geometry under weight-bearing conditions.

On the basis of these various studies, we developed a method for the design of Guided Motion knees, which would be implanted without the cruciates, and which would restore anatomic knee mechanics. The method started with the femoral component, where the medial side had features to provide a continuous radius anteriorly, and distally to 75 degrees flexion when a post-cam would contact. This feature would prevent paradoxical anterior femoral sliding in early flexion. Multiple femoral positions were then defined for accommodating anatomic motion, in particular limited AP motion on the medial side, but posterior displacement laterally. Tibial bearing surfaces were generated accordingly.

Tests were carried out on the crouching machine and on a Desktop TKR Test machine to compare the TKR motion with anatomic. Although not accurate in all respects, the Guided Motion designs were closer than models of standard TKR’s today. Such Guided Motion designs hold the promise for restoring anatomic knee mechanics and a normal feeling knee.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_IV | Pages 427 - 427
1 Nov 2011
Takemoto R Arno S Kinariwala N Chan K Hennessy D Nguyen N Walker P Fetto J
Full Access

Over the last two decades, design modifications in cementless total hip arthoplasty have led to longer lasting implants and an increased success rate. However, there remains limitations to the cementless femoral stem implant. Traditional cementless femoral components require large amounts of bone to be broached prior to stem insertion (1). This leads to a decrease in host bone stock, which can become problematic in a young patient who may eventually require a revision operation during his or her lifetime. Osteopenia, only second to distal stress shielding can lead to aseptic loosening of the implant and stem subsidence, which also accelerates the need for a revision operation (24). Recent literature suggests that thigh pain due to distal canal fixation, micro-motion, uneven stress patterns or cortex impingement by the femoral stem is directly correlated to increased stem sizes and often very disabling to a patient (58). In this study, we sought to determine whether reducing stem length in the femoral implant would produce more physiologic loading characteristics in the proximal femur and thus eliminate any remaining stress shielding that is present in the current design. We analyzed the surface strains in 13 femurs implanted with

no implants,

stemless,

ultra short and

short stem proximal fill implants in a test rig designed to assimilate muscle forces across the hip joints, including the ilio-tibial band and the hip abductors.

Analysis of the resulting surface strains was performed using the photoelastic method. For each femur, intact and with the different stem length components in place, the fringe patterns were compared at the same applied loads. The highest fringe orders observed for all tests were located on the lateral proximal femur and medial proximal femur. The fringes decreased as they approached the neutral axis of bending (posterior and anterior). Distal fringe patterns were more prominent as the stem length increased. The results demonstrate that the stemless design most closely replicated normal strain patterns seen in a native femur during simulated gait. The presence of a stemless, ultra short and short stem reduced proximal strain and increased distal strain linearly, thereby increasing the potential for stress shielding. The stemless design most closely replicated normal strain patterns observed in a native femur and for this reason has the potential to address the shortcomings of the traditional cementless femoral implant.