The national back pain pathway sets out the gold standard pathway for patients with back and radicular pain. To improve implementation we needed to understand current practice and identify divergences from the pathway. 1) What patient is referred into the surgical clinic? 2) What treatments had they tried? 3) How many had spinal interventions. 4) Consider ways to improve the appropriateness of referrals.Background
Objectives
Previous research in people with musculoskeletal low back pain (MLBP) in primary care shows that a reliable and valid measure of consultation-based reassurance enables testing reassurance against patient' outcomes. Little is known about the role of reassurance in people with MLBP consulting spinal surgeons, especially in cases where surgeons recommend not to have surgery. There might be several reasons to exclude surgery as a treatment option, that range from positive messages about symptoms resolving to negative messages, suggesting that all reasonable avenue of treatment have been exhausted. AIM to explore patient's experience of consultation-based reassurance in people with MLBP who have been recently advised not to have surgery. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 low back pain patients who had recently consulted for spinal surgery and were advised that surgery is not indicated. Interview were audio recorded and transcribed, and then coded using NVIVO qualitative software and analysed using the Framework Analysis.Background
Methods
Following lumbar spine surgery patients with a high BMI appear to have increased post-operative complications including surgical site infections (SSI), urinary complications, increased anaesthetic/operative time and a greater need for post-operative blood transfusion. There is no current evidence, however, analysing the effect of BMI on functional outcome. We aimed to analyse the effect of BMI on functional outcome following lumbar spine surgery.Background:
Purpose:
Spondylodiscitis is an uncommon condition with an incidence of 1:100,000 to 1:250,000 in developed countries. Diagnosis and treatment can be delayed resulting in poor outcomes. A high index of suspicion is necessary considering the associated mortality, reported at 2–17%. Establishing a diagnosis can be challenging as features are non-specific and onset may be insidious. While treatment is usually conservative, certain situations require surgery. All patients however require careful assessment and monitoring for complications that may require further intervention. A review of our practice in Wexham Park and Heatherwood Hospital NHS Trust from 2009 to 2013 produced a guideline suggesting the need for blood cultures, imaging with MRI and involvement of the infectious diseases and spinal teams. We re-audited (20 cases) to assess compliance with the guidelines, which were in place to reduce the delay in diagnosis. Recurrent presentation, infections of unknown origin and deterioration after a short course of antibiotics were indicators for triggering imaging of the spine for discitis. Delays in diagnosis were more marked in bacterial cases rather than tuberculosis. It was impossible to predetermine patients that would require surgical intervention. Our compliance with the guideline had improved from 70 to over 90% and there were no relapses or mortality.
Epidural steroid injections can provide temporary relief of symptoms in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Surgery is indicated when conservative measures fail. We hypothesise that patients who gain temporary relief of symptoms from the administration of epidural steroid injections are more likely to result in an improvement in symptoms following surgical intervention compared to patients who do not respond to injection therapy. The records of patients who had received both an epidural injection and surgical intervention for lumbar spinal stenosis between July 2008 and July 2010 were identified and retrospectively reviewed. Relief of symptoms following epidural injection was noted at 6 weeks post procedure and the patients symptoms following surgical intervention was noted and classified according to MacNab's criteria at 3 months post-surgery.Background
Method
Whether to order an MRI scan or not for patients with low back and leg pain (LBP). Resources are limited. Waiting for diagnostic imaging impacts time to treatment and may be critical to the “18 week target”. We have looked into devising a system in which we can ordered MRI scans for patients with LBP pre-clinical assessment based on questionnaire and accessing their referral letter. 49 patient's referrals were looked into (randomly picked). 23 had a questionnaire filled by either themselves or their GPs. the rests had MRI scans ordered based on their referral letters. MRI scans were requested pre-clinical assessment for patients with symptoms spreading beyond their knees and willing to consider interventional treatments (injections or operations). We considered MRI positive if the report mentioned stenosis or disc prolapse causing nerve root or cauda compression. 7 out of the 23 fitted the criteria for MRI. 6 (85%) of them had positive results. 26 of the GP referrals letters had MRI out of those 16 (61%) had positive results. In total out of 33 MRI, 22 (66.7%) were positive.Purpose and background
Methods and results
Transforaminal epidurals (TFEs) have been widely used as a treatment for lumbar radicular pain since its introduction by Krempen and Smith in 19741. Originally used as a diagnostic tool, it is now becoming increasingly recognised as a definitive treatment2. This study investigates the use of TFEs by a single surgeon over 4 years. We hoped that the study would add to our understanding and the discussion of the actual benefit of therapeutic steroid and local anaesthetic injections by this route3. A total of 181 patients were identified. At injection 10mls 0.25% Marcaine and 40mg Depomedrone was injected under fluoroscopic guidance. Clinic notes and MRI reports for all patients were reviewed. Of the 176 patients included in the study, 127 showed a symptomatic improvement. Of these patients, 59 proceeded to surgical decompression. For 50 patients, TFE was the definitive treatment. 13 patients were offered but declined surgery. 5 patients were too frail to proceed to surgery. 49 patients showed no symptomatic improvement. Of this group, 34 were deemed unsuitable for surgical intervention. 15 patients did proceed to surgery.Background and Aims
Methods and Results
A number of studies have looked at the incidence of cervical rib in various ethnic groups, but have a number of limitations. This is the first large scale study looking at the incidence in White British with direct comparison to the Asian population. A total of 1545 consecutive cervical spine radiographs performed for any reason were collected and reviewed. 5.9% of White British and 24.9% of Asian patients had evidence of cervical rib. This was statistically significant (p<
0.0001, χ2 test). Asians are 5 times more likely compared to White British to have cervical rib (OR=5.303, 95% CI=3.825–7.354). An analysis of male Vs female difference as well as incidence of the various subtypes of cervical rib will be presented. We reccomend that the results of this study should
be considered in the assessment of patients with symptoms of thoracic outlet syndrome, taken into account during review of cervical spine radiographs and included in anatomy textbooks in the future.