Long term, secondary implant fixation of Total Disc Replacements (TDR) can be enhanced by hydroxyapatite or similar osseo-conductive coatings. These coatings are routinely applied to metal substrates. The objective of this in vivo study was to investigate the early stability and subsequent bone response adjacent to an all polymer TDR implant over a period of six months in an animal model. Six skeletally mature male baboons (Papio annubis) were followed for a period of 6 months. Using a transperitoneal exposure, a custom-sized Cadisc L device was implanted into the disc space one level above the lumbo-sacral junction in all subjects. Radiographs of the lumbar spine were acquired prior to surgery, and post-operatively at intervals up to 6 months to assess implant stability. Flourochrome markers (which contain molecules that bind to mineralization fronts) were injected at specified intervals in order to investigate bone remodeling with time. Animals were humanely euthanized six months after index surgery. Test and control specimens were retrieved, fixed and subjected to histological processing to assess the bone-implant-bone interface. Fluorescence microscopy and confocal scanning laser microscopy were utilized with BioQuant image analysis to determine the bone mineral apposition rates and gross morphology. Radiographic evaluation revealed no loss of disc height at the operative level or adjacent levels. No evidence of subsidence or significant migration of the implant up to 6 months. Heterotopic ossification was observed to varying degrees at the operated level. Histology revealed the implant primary fixation features embedded within the adjacent vertebral endplates. Flourochrome distribution revealed active bone remodeling occurring adjacent to the polymeric end-plate with no evidence of adverse biological responses. Mineral apposition rates of between 0.7 and 1.7 microns / day are in keeping with literature values for hydroxyapatite coated implants in cancellous sites of various species. Radiographic assessment demonstrates that the Cadisc L implant remains stable in vivo with no evidence of subsidence or significant migration. Histological analysis suggests the primary fixation features are engaged, and in close apposition with the adjacent vertebral bone. Flourochrome markers provide evidence of a positive bone remodelling response in the presence of the implant.
Physician administered McNab criteria “excellent, good, fair and poor” were compared to ODI, VAS back- and leg pain and to the patients answer describing the outcome of the operation with the following options: helped a lot, helped, helped only little, didn’t help and made things worse. Then the concept of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) was applied
In the “good” group 86% (MCID: 51.7%) of patients improved regarding ODI, 81% (MCID: 65,7%) regarding back and 93% (MCID: 89.4%) regarding leg pain. 99% of patients said that the treatment helped a lot, helped or helped only little. 65% (MCID: 40%) of patients in the “fair” group had improved ODIs. Even in this group 88% of patients perceived the treatment as helping a lot, helping or helping only little. Moreover in the “poor” group had 60% (MCID: 40%) of patients improved ODIs, 55% (MCID: 40%) alleviated back and 36% (MCID: 30%) reduced leg pain. But only 30% of patient stated that the treatment helped or helped only little. Spearman correlation coefficients for ODI, VAS back, VAS leg and patient’s verbal statement on overall outcome were 0.42, 0.18, 0.27 and 0.53.
“Delta fixation” was developed to treat low-grade L5 isthmic spondylolisthesis. It involves placement of pedicle screws into L5 and from S1 through the L5/S1 disc into L5 (Fig.1). A biomechanical comparison to standard Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF) with two anterior cages and pedicle screws in L5 and S1 was made. Eight fresh frozen human specimens were instrumented with both fixations and tested. Delta fixation was significantly more stable in resisting rotation. It requires less manipulation of the nerve roots and spares the cost of the fusion cages. Our objective is to compare the stability of Delta versus PLIF fixation in the treatment of low grade isthmic spondylolisthesis Delta fixation provides superior initial stability, and therefore is an acceptable alternative to PLIF for the treatment of low grade isthmic spondylolisthesis of L5-S1. Symptomatic low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis of L5 is often managed with PLIF. This procedure requires extensive manipulation of the cauda equine, posterior resection of the disc and the placement of two inter-body cages as spacers in addition to pedicle screws in L5 and S1. Delta Fixation has been developed to provide stable fixation with less nerve root manipulation and without the use of inter-body cages. It is therefore a safer alternative method of fixation that spares the additional cost of the fusion cages. When comparing Delta fixation to PLIF fixation the only statistically significant difference was found in axial rotation. Delta fixation had 2.05 degrees less ROM and 0.90 degrees less NZ compared to PLIF fixation with P values of 0.0052 and 0.0104 respectively. This demonstrates that the delta fixation is more stable than PLIF fixation. Eight fresh frozen human spines were used. Matched pairs were created and block randomization used to create two groups: PLIF fixation and Delta fixation groups. The specimens were instrumented with a grade II spondylolisthesis of L5-S1, tested, and then re-instrumented with the alternative fixation and tested again. Vertical displacement, axial rotation, flexion– extension and side bending were tested using an MTS machine. Please contact author for tables and/or diagrams.
Hyaline cartilage and immature nucleus pulposus possess similar macromolecules in their extracellular matrix, and there is no unique molecular marker to distinguish the two tissues. We show that in normal disc (fifteen to twenty-five years old), the GAG to hydroxyproline ratio (proteoglycan to collagen ratio) within the nucleus pulposus is approximately 28:1. However, the GAG to hydroxyproline ratio within hyaline cartilage of the same group is 2.5:1. This information is important in identifying stem cell conversion to a nucleus pulposus cell phenotype rather than a chondrocyte phenotype for tissue engineering of intervertebral disc. Tissue engineering of intervertebral discs (IVDs) using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) induced to differentiate into a disc-cell phenotype has been considered as an alternative treatment for disc degeneration. Since there is no unique marker for disc tissue, and because cartilage and immature nucleus pulposus (NP) possess similar macromolecules in their extracellular matrix, it is currently difficult to recognize MSC conversion to a disc cell. In this study, we compare the proteoglycan to collagen ratio in the NP of normal disc to that of the hyaline cartilage of the endplate within the same group of individuals. To distinguish between a normal NP and hyaline cartilage phenotype for tissue engineering of IVDs. Human lumbar spine specimens were harvested from fresh cadavers, aged twelve week to seventy-nine year. Discs and endplates were examined for total collagen using the hydroxyproline assay and glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content using a standard assay. In a mature disc with no degeneration (fifteen to twentyfive years), the GAG to hydroxyproline ratio within the NP is approximately 28:1. However, the ratio within the hyaline cartilage endplate of the same group is 2.5:1. A high proteoglycan to collagen ratio can be used to distinguish NP cells from chondrocytes. The lower NP collagen content is probably responsible for its gelatinous nature rather than the firm texture of hyaline cartilage, and this is essential for normal disc function. This information is crucial in identifying a NP-like phenotype when MSCs are induced to differentiate into a disc cell as opposed to a chondrocyte, for tissue engineering of IVDs.
Easier patient positioning and less extensive soft tissue dissection have spurred a trend for anterior instrumentation and fusion for C-spine fracture/ dislocations. We present group of forty-six patients treated over an eighteen month period with an anterior approach. There were no permanent approach related complications, infections, hardware failures or graft displacements. One patient had worsened post-operative neurological findings. One patient required additional posterior stabilization for a missed injury. Two patients were not reducible from the front and required posterior reduction and stabilization followed by anterior instrumentation and fusion. All grafts healed within four months of the operation. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of anterior instrumentation and fusion for Cervical Spine fracture/ dislocations Over an eighteen month period, forty-six out of fifty-two patients with C-spine injuries requiring surgical treatment were followed prospectively. All patients underwent anterior approaches to stabilize and fuse the unstable segments using tricortical bone grafting and application of an anterior plate (CSLP, Synthes). Thirty-eight patients had single level injuries treated with discectomy and fusion. Two patients had two level discecomies. Six patients underwent corpectomy and fusions for fractures of the vertebral bodies There were no approach related complications such as recurrent laryngeal nerve injuries, oesophageal perforations, vascular injuries or strokes. One patient deteriorated neurologically. All other patients either improved neurologically or remained with their original findings. Two patients required oral antibiotics for superficial infections at the donor site. There were no spine infections, hardware loosening or graft extrusions. All bone grafts healed within four months both clinically and radiologically. Forty-one patients complained of minor or no pain after four months. Five patients continued to have moderate discomfort. One of these patients had a missed injury above his two-level fusion with gradual progression into kyphosis requiring posterior stabilization. Halo vest immobilization and posterior stabilization for C-spine fracture /dislocations have been the treatment of choice for many surgeons. The low complication and failure rate has spurred on a gradual change towards anterior instrumentation and fusion. Our study very strongly supports this trend. We see little indication for the more invasive posterior approach given our present results.