Reverse hybrid total hip replacement (THR) offers significant theoretical benefits but is uncommonly used. Our primary objective was to evaluate implant survival with all cause revision and revision for aseptic loosening of either component as endpoints. Data was collected prospectively on 1, 088 (988 patients) consecutive reverse hybrid THRs. Mean patient age was 69.3 years (range, 21–94) and mean follow-up was 8.2 years (range, 5–11.3). No patients were lost to follow-up. Overall, 194 (17.8%) procedures were performed in patients under 60 years, 666 (61.1%) were performed in female patients and 349 (32.1%) were performed by a trainee. Acetabular components were ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene in 415 (38.1%) hips, highly cross-linked polyethylene in 669 (61.5%) hips and vitamin E stabilised polyethylene in 4 (0.4%) hips. Femoral stems were collared in 757 (69.7%) hips and collarless in 331 (30.3%) hips. Femoral head sizes were 28 mm in 957 (87.9%) hips and 32 mm in 131 (12.1%) hips. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier methodology. Log rank tests were used to asses differences in survival by age, gender, head size and surgeon grade.Introduction
Patients/Materials & Methods
A fractured hip is the commonest cause of injury related death in the UK. Prompt surgery has been found to improve pain scores and reduce the length of hospital stay, risk of decubitus ulcer formation and mortality rates. The hip fracture Best Practice Tariff (BPT) aims to improve these outcomes by financially compensating services, which deliver hip fracture surgery within 36 hours of admission. Ensuring that delays are reserved for patients with conditions which compromise survival, but are responsive to medical optimisation, would facilitate enhanced outcomes and help to achieve the 36-hour target. We aimed to identify medical conditions associated with patients failing to achieve the 36-hour cut off, and evaluated whether these were justified by calculating their associated mortality risk. Prospectively collected data from the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) and inpatient hospital records and blood results from a single major trauma centre were obtained. Complete data sets from 1361 patients were available for analysis. Medical conditions contributing to surgical delay beyond the BPPT (Best Practice Tariff Target) 36-hour cut off, were identified and analysed using univariate and multivariate regression analyses, whilst adjusting for covariates. The mortality risk associated with each factor contributing to surgical delay was then calculated using univariate and hierarchical regression techniques.Introduction
Methods
To review the outcome of deep prosthetic infection in patients following hip hemiarthroplasty surgery. A retrospective case-note analysis was performed of deep infection coded hip hemiarthroplasty patients between 2004–2009. Patients were selected when there was proven microbiology from deep wound swabs or tissue specimens.Aim
Method
Twenty two percent of the non operatively managed knees developed symptomatic instability and 10% of knees treated with tibial spine fixation developed instability (p=0.22). Stiffness was more common in knees treated with tibial spine fixation than in knees managed nonoperatively (60% vs 19%, p <
0.0005). There was a tendency for increased stiffness in older patients treated with surgical fixation of the tibial spine.
An analysis on prospective data collected on our hip database was carried out on all patients undergoing primary cemented unilateral total hip arthroplasty in the last 5 years comparing the short term outcomes between diabetics and non-diabetics. There were 1220 non-diabetics and 77 diabetics identified from the database with at least 3 years follow up. (average 3.6 years). We found no significant difference with respect to age, sex and diagnosis between the 2 groups. Diabetics did have a significantly higher BMI (30.2 versus 27.7, p<
0.001) and higher incidence of coronary artery disease (31% versus 15%, p<
0.001) We found no increase in the rate of deep periprosthetic infection, superficial wound complications, dislocation, blood loss and DVT between diabetics and non-diabetics even after adjusting for potential confounders of age, sex, diagnosis, BMI and the presence of coronary artery disease. The only factor that was found to be significantly different between the 2 groups was length of stay (10.73 versus 9.56 days, p<
0.05). Further analysis of the diabetic group only showed no difference with regard the same outcomes between insulin-dependent, diet-controlled and diet and oral hypoglycaemic-controlled patient subsets. From this study we conclude that at the time of taking informed consent from diabetic patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty the only potential difference from non-diabetics is that the length of stay may be longer.
The identification of preoperative risk factors for blood transfusion following total joint arthroplasty facilitates the selection of patients for blood-conservation strategies such as preoperative autologous blood donation. We reviewed prospective data on 1016 unilateral THRs to establish the preoperative risk factors associated with peri-operative blood transfusion. On average, transfused patients were older, with lower preoperative haemoglobin, weight, height and body mass indices than patients who were not transfused. When the relationship between variables and transfusion was examined by multivariate analysis with multiple logistic regressions, only preoperative haemoglobin and weight were identified as significant independent factors increasing the risk of transfusion (p <
0.001). A threefold increase in transfusion risk was associated with haemoglobin below 12. Patients of low weight or with haemoglobin below 12 should be considered for blood-conserving interventions.
Introduction: Somatosensory evoked potentials are monitored during the surgical treatment of spinal disorders to reduce the risk of cord injury. Whilst studies have examined its role in patients undergoing correction of idiopathic and neuromuscular scoliotic curves, its effectiveness in patients undergoing operative treatment for spinal injury is less certain. Methods and Results: We reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent surgery for spinal trauma. between 1995 and 2000. There were 82 patients with adequate data for analysis who underwent 83 spinal reconstructive procedures. We recorded the age at injury, diagnosis, time of operation, levels instrumented, systolic and diastolic blood pressures and surgical approach. The intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) traces were examined. The SSEP at insertion of electrode was taken as the control level. The highest and lowest intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials and SSEP at closure were noted and expressed as a percentage of the control value. Forty patients (48%) had a pre-operative neurological deficit. Neurological deterioration occurred postoperatively in three patients. Eighty-three traces from 82 patients were available for analysis. Fifty-seven patients had a fall in trace amplitude by more than 25% of the control, 25 by more than 50% and eight by more than 75%. With an SSEP amplitude loss of 60%, both sensitivity and specificity for the prediction of post-operative neurological injury were optimised at 67 and 81% respectively, with one false negative result. SSEP rise at completion of spinal reconstruction and highest intraoperative SSEP rise was compared with neurological outcome in the 40 patients with abnormal pre-operative neurology. Neurology improved in all patients in this group who had a trace amplitude more than 60% above the control value at end of operation. None had neurological deterioration. There was no correlation between intraoperative SSEP rise and neurological outcome. Conclusion: Loss of trace amplitude more than 50% is common during spinal reconstructive surgery after trauma, however a 60% threshold for SSEP fall improves specificity by reducing the rate of false positive results. A trace amplitude 60% above the control value at completion of operation is specific but not sensitive for postoperative neurological improvement.