This study aims to report the radiological corrections achieved and complication profile of Peri-Acetabular Osteotomy (PAO) undertaken through the minimally invasive approach. 106 PAOs were performed in 103 patients, by senior author, using a minimally invasive approach from 2007 to 2015. Pre- and post-operative radiographs were reviewed and the degree of acetabular re-orientation was analysed. Case notes were examined retrospectively to identify haemoglobin levels and complications across two sites.Purpose
Method
Trial reduction while performing total hip replacement is an essential step of the procedure. This is to check the stability of the hip joint with the selected implant sizes and to assess the leg length to avoid discrepancy. Disengagement of the femoral head trial from the femoral rasp stem, with subsequent migration of the trial head into the pelvic cavity is a rare occurrence, but can be a very frustrating complication to both the surgeon and occasionally the patient. We present our experience with this exceptional situation and different management options, together with systematic review of the literature. We conducted Medline database search via Pubmed interface. MeSH search was used. Systematic review of English literature case reports was performed. 15 reports were found discussing intra-pelvic migration of different arthroplsty related materials. The total number of reported cases was 24 cases, out of those, 21 cases were related to migration of femoral trial head, 2 cases of migrated modular hemiarthroplasty bipolar heads and one case of migrated femoral head definitive implant.Introduction
Patients and methods
In a society whereby the incidence of obesity is increasing and medico-legal implications of treatment failure are more frequently ending with the consulting doctor, clarity is required as to any restrictions placed on common orthopaedic implants by manufacturing companies. The aim of this study was to identify any restrictions placed on the commonly used femoral stem implants in total hip replacement (THR) surgery, by the manufacturers, based on patient weight. The United Kingdom (UK) National Joint Registry (NJR) was used to identify the five most commonly used cemented and uncemented femoral stem implants during 2012. The manufacturing companies responsible for these implants were asked to provide details of any weight restrictions placed on these implants. The Corail size 6 stem is the only implant to have a weight restriction (60Kg). All other stems, both cemented and uncemented, were free of any restrictions. Fatigue fracture of the femoral stem has been well documented in the literature, particularly involving the high nitrogen stainless steel cemented femoral stems and to a lesser extent the cemented cobalt chrome and uncemented femoral stems. In all cases excessive patient weight leading to increased cantilever bending of the femoral stem was thought to be a major factor contributing to the failure mechanism. From the current literature there is clearly an association between excessive patient weight and fatigue failure of the femoral stem. We suggest avoiding, where possible, the insertion of small stems (particularly cemented stems) and large offset stems (particularly those with a modular neck) in overweight patients.
We report the radiological outcomes, and short-term clinical results, of 47 periacetabular osteotomies undertaken through both the traditional bikini incision, and a minimally invasive approach. 47 periacetabular osteotomies have been undertaken in 45 patients, by the senior author, between 2005 and 2013. There were 10 male and 35 female patients. The mean age at operation was 28.2 years. Since 2010 surgery has been performed through a 7-cm skin incision (31 hips), an incision coined as minimally invasive by Søballe et al when they described their trans-sartorial approach for acetabular surgery. Clinical data was collected prospectively; primary outcome measures included the young adult hip score and the hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score. Pre- and post-operative radiographs were analysed for achieved acetabular reorientation. At the time of follow-up the median young adult hip score had improved significantly from pre-operative values. Mean scores were 35.4 pre-operatively, and 64.25 post-operatively. Improvement in the anterior and lateral centre-edge angle was 32 and 32.9 degrees respectively through a traditional incision, and 27.1 and 30 degrees through the minimally invasive approach (p>0.05). No major complications occurred in any patient. Four patients complained of lateral cutaneous nerve hypoaesthesia, in two patients there was delayed union of the pubic osteotomy and in one non-union. Two patients have gone on to total hip replacement. The minimally invasive approach is safe and allows for accurate reorientation of the acetabulum whilst minimizing tissue damage. The scar is cosmetically appealing to patients, especially the predominantly female group treated with this condition. We did not see the evidence of reduced surgical stay that has been reported by other groups utilizing a minimally invasive approach. Level of evidence: II
