Aims. Despite higher rates of revision after total hip arthroplasty (THA) being reported for uncemented stems in patients aged > 75 years, they are frequently used in this age group. Increased mortality after cemented fixation is often used as a justification, but recent data do not confirm this association. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of the design of the stem and the type of fixation on the rate of revision and immediate postoperative mortality, focusing on the age and sex of the patients. Methods. A total of 333,144 patients with primary osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip who underwent elective THA between November 2012 and September 2022, using uncemented acetabular components without reconstruction shells, from the German arthroplasty registry were included in the study. The revision rates three years postoperatively for four types of stem (uncemented, uncemented with collar, uncemented short, and cemented) were compared within four age groups: < 60 years (Young), between 61 and 70 years (Mid-I), between 71 and 80 years (Mid-II), and aged > 80 years (Old). A noninferiority analysis was performed on the most frequently used designs of stem. Results. The design of the stem was found to have no significant influence on the rate of revision for either sex in the Young group. Uncemented collared stems had a significantly lower rate of revision compared with the other types of stem for females in the Mid-I group. There was a significantly higher rate of revision for uncemented stems in females in the Mid-II group compared with all other types of stem, while in males the rate for uncemented stems was only significantly higher than the rate for cemented stems. Cemented stems had a significantly lower revision rate compared with uncemented and short stems for both sexes in the Old cohort, as did females with collared stems. The rate of immediate postoperative mortality was similar for all types of stem in the Old age group, as were the American Society of Anesthesiologists grades. Conclusion. In patients aged > 80 years, uncemented and short stems had significantly higher revision rates compared with cemented and collared stems, especially in females. The design of the stem and type of fixation have to be analyzed in more detail than only considering cemented and uncemented fixation, in order to further improve the success of THA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(3 Supple A):130–136

Femoral offset restoration is related to low rates of wear and dislocation. Replication of the native hip anatomy improves prosthesis survival, whereas increasing the femoral offset elevates the torque stresses, thus inducing a risk of suboptimal stem fixation. Although the Corail (DePuy Synthes, St Priest, France) uncemented stem has an excellent record of fixation, an unexpectedly number of aseptic loosenings has been noted in our institution. We sought to characterize the clinical parameters observed in a group of patients who have experienced metaphyseal aseptic loosenings with the collarless version of the Corail uncemented femoral component; describe the radiographic findings in this group of patients; expose the intraoperative findings in the cases that needed revision surgery and to calculate a possible frequency of this complication. We present a series of 15 metaphyseal debondings of the collarless version of the Corail uncemented stem in primary total hip arthroplasty. Eleven men and four woman with an average age of 60 years old (range: 42 to 81 years old) and a previous history of osteoarthritis presented with thigh pain and limping at an average of 33 months postoperative (range: 5 to 100 months). Seven cases presented a Dorr´s classification type A femur and 8 cases a type B femur. In 10 of the 15 cases a 36 mm ceramic on ceramic bearing surface was implanted and in 5 a 28 mm diameter ceramic on polyethylene pair. Radiographic assessment of the failures evidenced an increase in femoral offset of 6.2 mm in average (range: 0 to 17 mm). Nine of the 15 cases had a standard offset stem and 3 an extended offset stem. Leg length discrepancy was in average 2.4 mm (range: 0 to 8 mm). None of the failures presented a more than 2 mm subsidence. Alignment of these stems was in average 2.1 degrees of varus (range: 0 to 5 degrees). Six cases were revised to a long cemented or uncemented stem, 2 cases were lost and 7 cases are awaiting revision surgery. Although the incidence of this complication was low (15 failures in 855 cases in 10 years = 1.75%), we are concerned about the real magnitude of this problem, as this mode of failure was observed up to 8 years after implantation. Enhanced lateralization of the hip, independently of the type of stem, may have played a role in the infrequent early failures of this popular design. Routine use of “fine tunning” preoperative planning in order to avoid offset enhancement is strongly reccommended, as this was the only suspected factor that was present in almost all the failures we observed

Background and aim. Recent proposals have been introduced to modify stem design and/or femoral fixation in total hip replacement (THR). New designs need to consider previous design features and their results. The aim of this study has been to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of six different designs of tapered uncemented stems implanted in our Institution. Methods. 1918 uncemented hips were prospectively assessed from 1999 to 2011 (minimum follow-up of five years for the unrevised hips). All hips had a 28 or 32 mm femoral head and metal-on-polyethylene or alumina-on-alumina bearing surface. Six uncemented femoral designs that shared a femoral tapered stem incorporating a coating surface were included in the study. The different design features included the type of coating, metaphyseal filling, and sectional shape. Results. Intra-operative proximal femoral crack was 6.7% in one of the designs (p=0.01), univariate analysis showing a lower risk of crack in the other designs. The position of the stem was neutral in 80% of the cases for all designs. Femoral canal filing was related to the stem design (p<0.001 at the three levels) and to the femoral level assessed (subset alpha=0.005). Twelve stems were revised for aseptic loosening (6 from two different designs). The survival rate for femoral aseptic loosening at 15 years was 96.6% (95% CI 93.8 to 99.4) for one of these two designs ad 97.4% (95% CI95.5 to 99.6) for the other. Regression analysis showed that stem design was the only factor related to aseptic loosening when adjusted for femoral canal filling (at the three levels) stem position (neutral or not) and femoral type (cylindrical or not). Conclusion. Tapered uncemented stems consistently provide excellent bone fixation. New designs need to avoid changing successful features and concentrate on the less successful aspects

Background and aim. Recent proposals have been introduced to modify stem design and/or femoral fixation in total hip replacement (THR). New designs need to consider previous design features and their results. The aim of this study has been to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of six different designs of tapered uncemented stems implanted in our Institution. Methods. 1918 uncemented hips were prospectively assessed from 1999 to 2011 (minimum follow-up of five years for the unrevised hips). All hips had a 28 or 32 mm femoral head and metal-on-polyethylene or alumina-on-alumina bearing surface. Six uncemented femoral designs that shared a femoral tapered stem incorporating a coating surface were included in the study. The different design features included the type of coating, metaphyseal filling, and sectional shape. Results. Intra-operative proximal femoral crack was 6.7% in one of the designs (p=0.01), univariate analysis showing a lower risk of crack in the other designs. The position of the stem was neutral in 80% of the cases for all designs. Femoral canal filing was related to the stem design (p<0.001 at the three levels) and to the femoral level assessed (subset alpha=0.005). Twelve stems were revised for aseptic loosening (6 from two different designs). The survival rate for femoral aseptic loosening at 15 years was 96.6% (95% CI 93.8 to 99.4) for one of these two designs ad 97.4% (95% CI95.5 to 99.6) for the other. Regression analysis showed that stem design was the only factor related to aseptic loosening when adjusted for femoral canal filling (at the three levels) stem position (neutral or not) and femoral type (cylindrical or not). Conclusion. Tapered uncemented stems consistently provide excellent bone fixation. New designs need to avoid changing successful features and concentrate on the less successful aspects

A longitudinal study was done assessing the latest radiographs available in a series of collarless Corail uncemented stems which have reported survival rates of 95% at 20 years. Parameters scored included the degree of “Ghosting” or delamination, the Gruen, the stem fit in the femoral canal and the degree of calcar resorption. Patient and implant demographics were noted. At 3 years the loosening rate was 23% reaching 64% at 6 years after the index procedure. It was present in all age groups, with a peak in the 24 to 49 year age group. Males and females had the same occurrence. When it was present this was always in zone 1. It was present in 6% of patients in zone 7, but then always associated with zone 1 changes. High and standard off-set stems had the same loosening rates. The looser fit of the stem the higher the incidence of loosening. There was no correlation to the type of bearing surface or the degree of calcar resorption. Those patients with a BMI of 25 – 35 had lower loosening rates compared to those with higher or lower BMI's. We postulate that cancellous bone on-growth onto the hydroxyapatite coating associated with loading flexural micro-motion leads to hydroxyapatite being pulled off the smooth stem substrate in zone 1. Progressive delamination of the hydroxyapatite then occurs. The triple-tapered design though imparts continued stability. We report high loosening rates in the Corail stem and suggest a mechanism for its development

The objective of this study was to compare the results of two consecutive series of patients with either intra-medullary uncemented stems (UCS) distal femoral endoprosthetic replacement or the Compress. ®. (CMP) distal femoral implant. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received UCS prosthesis (Group-1: 54 patients) and those who received CMP prosthesis (Group-2: 42 patients).The most frequent diagnosis was osteosarcoma. Age and gender were similar both groups. In Group-1, at a mean follow-up of 144 months, 37 prostheses were still in place. The overall Kaplan-Meier prosthetic survival rates were 79% at five and 62 % at ten years. Most of failures were long term complications. Aseptic loosening was the primary cause of late prosthetic failure. On Cox regression analysis, prosthetic stem diameter under 13mm was a significant negative prognostic factor for prosthetic survival (p=0.016). In Group-2, at a mean follow-up of 84 months, 36 prostheses were still in place. The overall rate of CMP prosthesis survival was 86% at 5 years. All complications were during the first postoperative year, being femoral fracture the main revision cause. The patients who retained the prosthesis had mainly good or excellent MSTS functional results in both groups

Aims

Periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) following hip arthroplasty are complex injuries. This study evaluates patient demographic characteristics, management, outcomes, and risk factors associated with PPF subtypes over a decade.

Introduction. Up to date there are only few reports in literature on the long term survival of uncemented stems. As for cemented THA, 10 year survival of at least 90% is required for any THA. Materials and methods. We followed the first 354 consecutive implantations of an uncemented, straight femoral stem (CLS, Zimmer Inc, Warsaw, USA) in 326 patients. Mean time of follow-up evaluation was 17 years (range, 15-20 years). Results. At follow-up, 84 patients (88 hips) had died, and 12 (12 hips) were lost to follow-up. 34 hips underwent femoral revision: 8 for infection, 8 for periprosthetic fracture, 1 for traumatic loosening and 17 for aseptic loosening of the stem. Overall survival was 89% at 17 years (95%-confidence limits, 87%-92%), survival with femoral revision for aseptic loosening as an end point was 94% at 17 years (95%-confidence limits, 92%-95%). The mean Harris Hip Score at follow-up was 83 points. 220 hips were available for radiolographic evaluation. None of the femoral components showed signs of loosening. Radiolucent lines (<2mm) in Gruen zones 1 and 7 were present in 14.1% (31 hips) and 15.0% (33 hips) respectively. Radiolucencies in zones 2-6 were found in 0.5% (1 hip)-1,8% (4 hips) on ap x-rays. Only one case of distal osteolysis was found after a previous Wagner resurfacing. No case of severe femoral osteolysis was found. The only strong predictor for aseptic loosening was undersizing of the stem with a canal fill index of <75%. Conclusions. The long-term results for this uncemented stem are encouraging and compare favorably with those achieved in primary cemented total hip arthroplasty in this age group

Introduction: Despite improved cementing techniques, the long term survival of hip arthroplasty in younger patients have been disappointing. THA in this group of young and active patients remains a major challenge. Consequently, cementless components have been developed. Longer implant survival, preservation of bone stock and ‘easier’ revisions have been advocated as potential benefits of cementless stems. Up to date there are only few reports in the literature on the long term results of uncemented stems. Like in cemented THA, 10 year survival of at least 90% is required for any THA. Materials and Methods: We followed 133 implantations of an uncemented, grit blasted straight titanium stem (CLS, Zimmer Inc, Warsaw, USA). The mean follow-up evaluation was 14 (10 – 20) years. The mean age at surgery was 37 (16 – 45) years. Results: At follow-up, 14 patients (10,5%) had died, and 10 (7,5%) were lost to follow-up. 3 patients under-went femoral revision. One for infection an two for aseptic loosening of the stem. There was no case of clinical or radiographic loosening at the time of follow-up. Overall survival was 96% at 14 years, survival with femoral revision for aseptic loosening as an end point was 97% at 14 years. The mean Harris-Hip-Score at follow-up was 81 points (range 45–100). 96 hips were available for radiolographic evaluation. Radiolucent lines (< 2mm) in Gruen zone 1 were present in 7 hips and in Gruen zone 7 in 2 hips, respectively. Small osteolytic lesions (< 1cm) in Gruen zone 1 were present in one hip and in Gruen zone 7 in 5 hips. Larger lesions (> 1cm) were present in one case in Gruen zone 1 and 7. No osteolysis or radiolucency was found in zones 2 – 6. No case of severe femoral osteolysis was found. Conclusions: The long-term results with this type uncemented stem in a young and active patient group are encouraging and better than those of cemented stems in this age group. We recommend the uncemented CLS stem for hip arthroplasty in young demanding patients

Periprosthetic fractures (PPF) of the femur following total hip arthroplasty represent a significant complication with a rising incidence. The commonest subtype is Vancouver B2 type, for which revision to a long uncemented tapered fluted stem is a widely accepted management. In this study we compare this procedure to the less commonly performed cement-in-cement revision. All patients undergoing surgical intervention for a Vancouver B2 femoral PPF in a cemented stem from 2008 – 2018 were identified. We collated patient age, gender, ASA score, BMI, operative time, blood transfusion requirement, change in haemoglobin (Hb) level, length of hospital stay and last Oxford Hip Score (OHS). Radiographic analysis was performed to assess time to fracture union and leg length discrepancy. Complications and survivorship of implant and patients were recorded. 43 uncemented and 29 cement-in-cement revisions were identified. There was no difference in patient demographics between groups. A significantly shorter operative time was found in the cement-in-cement group, but there was no difference in transfusion requirement, Hb change, or length of hospital stay. OHS was comparable between groups. A non-significant increase in overall complication rates was found in the revision uncemented group, with a significantly higher dislocation rate. Time of union was comparable and there were no non-unions in the cement-in-cement group. A greater degree of stem subsidence was found in the uncemented group. There was no difference in any revision surgery required in either group. Three patients in the uncemented group died in the perioperative period, compared to none in the cement-in-cement group. With appropriate patient selection, both cement-in-cement and long uncemented tapered stem revision represent appropriate treatment options for Vancouver B2 fractures

Introduction: The aim of this study was to analyze the periprosthetic bone remodeling of the femoral component after implantation of an uncemented taper-design stem using CT-assisted osteodensitometry. This method allows accurate three-dimensional evaluation of cortical and cancellous bone with high resolution. Material and methods: We followed 21 consecutive Patients with osteoarthritis who received primary total hip replacement using 21 uncemented three-dimensionally shaped taper stems (TiAl6V4-Cerafit, Ceraver, France). CT-evaluation was performed 2 weeks, 1 and 6 years post-op. Bone mineral density (BMD) [mg/ml] was determined separately for both cortical and cancellous bone using a special software. Results: Mean decrease of cortical BMD in the proximal (metaphyseal) area 6 years post-op was −25%, (1 year post-op −15%). Only slight changes of BMD were observed in the distal (diaphyseal) area. Cancellous BMD decreased progressively from −26% 1 year post-op to −49% 6 years after index operation in the proximal area. Cortical bone density loss was lower and non-progressive at the diaphysis (Ø −7% 1 year, −9% 6 years post-OP) and the distal region (Ø −6% 1 year, −4% 6 years post-OP) of the stem. All stems showed no signs of loosening on plain radiography and good clinical results according to the Harris hip score. Conclusion: Computertomography assisted osteoden-sitometry is the only method which allows discrimination between periprosthetic cortical and cancellous bone density changes in vivo. The analyzed uncemented stem is anchored at the diaphysis and distal region. Due to the changed biomechanical loading after stem implantation, progressive proximal cancellous bone density loss was measured for the first time in vivo. Its role in the pathogenesis of implant loosening is still unknown and needs to be further elucidated

Introduction. Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPF) have become more common as the population at risk, patients with joint arthroplasty, has increased. The choice of treatment depends on the location of the fracture relative to the implant, the residual fixation of the implant and patient factors such as deficient bone stock or osteopenia. The Vancouver classification categorises types of PPF and identifies strategies for its management. However, the Vancouver classification is mainly based and focused on cemented implants. Recently a modified algorithm for the management of PPF based on the Vancouver classification has been published. We analysed PPF with a single type of uncemented hip stem and compared our treatment to the most recent management algorithm. Methods. From a consecutive series of 619 uncemented proximal hydroxyapatatite coated ABG-I prostheses, 14 patients (2.3%) sustained a PPF after an adequate trauma. The mean time between the index operation and the fracture was 6.9 years(range: 2.0 to 13.7 years). The mean age of the patients at the time of fracture was 79 years (range 59–87). The fracture patterns and state of stem fixation were analysed. Results. In 5 patients the fracture was limited to the proximal Gruen zones 1 and 7 with the stem still firmly fixed (type A). Fracture treatment was conservative but in one patient the greater trochanter had to be reat-tached. Six B1,two B2 fractures and one B3 fracture were seen. Compared to the Vancouver classification we observed a different pattern in the type B fractures. No fractures at the tip of the stem were seen as common and characteristic in cemented implants. Three B1 fractures were operated due to fracture displacement and three were treated conservately. THe B2 and B3 fractures were managed with long uncemented revision stems because of a disrupted bone-prosthesis interface. Type C fractures were not seen. All fractures healed well. Conclusion. The ABG-I shows a bone remodelling pattern consisting of mid stem bone condensation and proximal bone resorption, which leads to a high bone density gradient. This gradient acts as a stress riser and thus can be a preferred location for the initiation of a fracture. This pattern is distinctly different from the fracture types observed for cemented implants. . As a result the ABG-I stem was modified to the ABG-II design permitting more proximal and less mid-stem load transfer, smoothening the bone density gradient. This study confirms that the Vancouver classification and the modified algorithm for the management of PPF are a simple,reproducible classification system also for the uncemented treatment modality. Conservative treatment is a valid option in case of a stable implant, while in case of a loose implant surgical intervention is mandatory

Introduction

The advance of surgical technique and implant design have led to improvement in total hip arthroplasty (THA), and short stem THA is now gaining number as a treatment option for younger patients to preserve bone in the proximal femur for a future revision. The SMF stem is shorter stem, and requires a slightly higher neck resection and implanted in slight varus to contact at lateral cortex. Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is the most common cause to hip osteoarthritis (OA) in Japan, and the morphology of the dysplastic femur is narrow canal and increased anteversion. Thus, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the SMF stem design can fit for Japanese patients, using CT based 3-D template planning.

To measure for evidence of early subsidence of Accolade tapered uncemented femoral stems. To quantify any subsidence and to identify factors which may predispose to this.

A retrospective audit of patients who have received Accolade stem total hip joint replacement in Hawkes Bay Hospital from October 2003 to October 2004. Post operative and follow up x rays (within one year of surgery) were reviewed and position of femoral component in the femur was measured and adjusted for magnification and angulation.

Thirty-eight patients were identified. Patients age averaged 66 years old (44 – 82yo). Results show an mean subsidence of 2.8mm with a range of 0 – 13mm.

There is evidence of early subsidence of Accolade femoral stems. In cases of large subsidence under sizing of the femoral component was identified as the most significant contributing factor.

Introduction: THA in young and active patients remains a major challenge. Uncemented femoral components have been advocated in young patients, but there are only few reports with more than 10 years follow-up.

Materials and Methods: We followed the first 153 consecutive implantations of an uncemented, straight femoral stem (CLS, Zimmer Inc, Warsaw, USA) in 141 patients. Mean time of follow-up evaluation was 17 years (range, 15–20 years), mean age at surgery was 47 years (23–55).

Results: At follow-up, 20 patients (20 hips) had died, and 7 (7 hips) were lost to follow-up. 10 patients (10 hips) underwent femoral revision–1 for infection, 4 for periprosthetic fracture, and 5 for aseptic loosening of the stem. Overall survival was 91% at 17 years (95%-confidence limits, 88%-94%), survival with femoral revision for aseptic loosening as an end point was 95% (95%-confidence limits, 93%–98%). The mean Harris-Hip-Score at follow-up evaluation was 84 points. 116 hips were available for radiolographic evaluation. Radiolucent lines (< 2mm) in Gruen zones 1 and 7 were present in 12,9% (15 hips) and 13,8% (16 hips), respectively. Radiolucencies in zones 2–6 were found in 0,9% (1 hip) – 2,6% (3 hips) on ap x-rays. Only one case of distal osteolysis was found after a previous Wagner resurfacing. No case of severe femoral osteolysis was found at follow-up.

Conclusions: The long-term results with this type of uncemented femoral component are encouraging and compare favorably with those achieved in primary cemented total hip arthroplasty in this group of young and active patients.

Introduction: THA in young and active patients remains a major challenge. Uncemented femoral components have been advocated in young patients, but there are only few reports with more than 10 years follow-up.

Materials and Methods: We followed the first 153 consecutive implantations of an uncemented, straight femoral stem (CLS, Zimmer Inc, Warsaw, USA) in 141 patients. Mean time of follow-up evaluation was 17 years (range, 15 – 20 years), mean age at surgery was 47 years (23–55).

Results: At follow-up, 20 patients (20 hips) had died, and 7 (7 hips) were lost to follow-up. 10 patients (10 hips) underwent femoral revision- 1 for infection, 4 for periprosthetic fracture, and 5 for aseptic loosening of the stem. Overall survival was 91% at 17 years (95%-confidence limits, 88%–94%), survival with femoral revision for aseptic loosening as an end point was 95% (95%-confidence limits, 93% – 98%). The mean Harris-Hip-Score at follow-up evaluation was 84 points. 116 hips were available for radiolographic evaluation. Radiolucent lines (< 2mm) in Gruen zones 1 and 7 were present in 12,9% (15 hips) and 13,8% (16 hips), respectively. Radiolucencies in zones 2 – 6 were found in 0,9% (1 hip) – 2,6% (3 hips) on ap x-rays. Only one case of distal osteolysis was found after a previous Wagner resurfacing. No case of severe femoral osteolysis was found at follow-up.

Conclusions: The long-term results with this type of uncemented femoral component are encouraging and compare favorably with those achieved in primary cemented total hip arthroplasty in this group of young and active patients.

Aims. Hip arthroplasty does not always restore normal anatomy. This is due to inaccurate surgery or lack of stem sizes. We evaluated the aptitude of four total hip arthroplasty systems to restore an anatomical and medialized hip rotation centre. Methods. Using 3D templating software in 49 CT scans of non-deformed femora, we virtually implanted: 1) small uncemented calcar-guided stems with two offset options (Optimys, Mathys), 2) uncemented straight stems with two offset options (Summit, DePuy Synthes), 3) cemented undersized stems (Exeter philosophy) with three offset options (CPT, ZimmerBiomet), and 4) cemented line-to-line stems (Kerboul philosophy) with proportional offsets (Centris, Mathys). We measured the distance between the templated and the anatomical and 5 mm medialized hip rotation centre. Results. Both rotation centres could be restored within 5 mm in 94% and 92% of cases, respectively. The cemented undersized stem performed best, combining freedom of stem positioning and a large offset range. The uncemented straight stem performed well because of its large and well-chosen offset range, and despite the need for cortical bone contact limiting stem positioning. The cemented line-to-line stem performed less well due to a small range of sizes and offsets. The uncemented calcar-guided stem performed worst, despite 24 sizes and a large and well-chosen offset range. This was attributed to the calcar curvature restricting the stem insertion depth along the femoral axis. Conclusion. In the majority of non-deformed femora, leg length, offset, and anteversion can be restored accurately with non-modular stems during 3D templating. Failure to restore hip biomechanics is mostly due to surgical inaccuracy. Small calcar guided stems offer no advantage to restore hip biomechanics compared to more traditional designs. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(7):476–485

The early revision rate in elective Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) three years after surgery in elderly patients over 80 years is significantly lower for cemented stems in the German Arthroplasty Register (EPRD): cemented 3,1% (3.0 – 3.2) vs. uncemented 4.2% (4.1 – 4.3; p < 0.001). However, the mortality rate in elderly patients is elevated for cemented fixation. This study presents a detailed analysis of the influence of stem type and fixation on revision and mortality rate in this patient cohort. Elective primary THA cases for primary Coxarthrosis using uncemented cups from the EPRD data base were analysed (n. 0. = 37,183). Four stem type groups were compared: cementless, cementless with collar, cementless short, and cemented. Stems with at least 300 cases at risk three years after surgery were analysed individually. The reference stem was determined as the stem with the lowest revision rate and at least 1000 cases under surveillance 3 years after surgery (n. 3. = 28,637). The revision rate for cemented stems (2.5% [2.2–1.81] was lower than for uncemented (4.5% [4.2–4.9]; p<0.001) and uncemented short stems (4.2% [3.1–5.7]; p=0.002). The revision rate of uncemented collared stems (2.3% [1.5–3.6]) was similar to cemented stems (p=0.89) and lower than for uncemented stems (p=0.02). One year mortality showed no sig. differences between the groups (p>0.17): cemented 3.2% [2.9–3.6], uncemented 3.4% [3.1–3.7], uncemented short 3.5% [2.5–4.9], uncemented collar 2.0% [1.2–3.2]. “Cementless” and “cementless short” stems should not be used in patients over 80 years due to the higher revision risk. If cementing should be avoided, “cementless collared” stems seem to be a good alternative combined with a tendency for a lower one year mortality rate

Stems provide short- and long-term stability to the femoral and tibial components. Poorer epiphyseal and metaphyseal bone quality will require sharing or offloading the femoral and tibial component interfaces with a stem. One needs to use stem technique most appropriate for each individual case because of variable anatomy and bone loss situations. The conflict with trying to obtain stability via the stem is that most stems are cylindrical but femoral and tibial metaphyseal/diaphyseal areas are conical in shape. Viable stem options include fully cemented short and long stems, uncemented long stems, offset uncemented stems, and a hybrid application of a cemented proximal end of longer uncemented diaphyseal engaging stems. Stems are not without their risk. The more the load is transferred to the cortex, the greater the risk of proximal interface stress shielding. A long uncemented stem has similar stress shielding as a short cemented stem. Long diaphyseal engaging stems that are cemented or uncemented have the potential to have end of stem pain, especially if more diaphyseal reaming is done to obtain greater cortical contact. A conical shaped long stem can provide more stability than a long cylindrical stem and avoid diaphyseal reaming. Use of long stems may create difficulty in placement of the tibial and femoral components in an optimal position. If the femoral or tibial components do not allow an offset stem insertion, using a long offset stem or short cemented stem is preferred. The amount of metaphyseal bone loss will drive the choice of stem used. Short cemented stems will not have good stability in poor metaphyseal bone without getting the cement out to the cortex. Long cemented stems provide satisfactory survivorship, however, most surgeons avoid cementing long stems due to the difficulty of removal, if a subsequent revision is required. If the metaphyseal bone is excellent, use of a short cemented stem or long uncemented stem can be expected to have good results. Long fully uncemented stems must have independent stability to be effective, or should be proximally cemented as a hybrid technique. Cases with AOI type IIb and III tibial and femoral defects are best managed with use of metaphyseal cones with short cemented stems or long hybrid straight or offset stems. Some studies also suggest that if the cone is very stable, no stem may be required. My preference is to use a short cemented stem or hybrid conical stem in patients with good metaphyseal bone. If significant metaphyseal bone loss is present, I will use a porous cone with either a short cemented stem, hybrid cylindrical or offset stem depending on the primary stability of the cone and whether the femoral or tibial component can be placed in an optimal position in patients with good metaphyseal bone

Introduction. Revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is becoming increasingly common in the United States as the population ages and larger numbers of primary TKA are performed in younger individuals. Cemented or uncemented tibial stems are frequently used in revision cases. Decreased clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction have been described for revision TKA. This study aims to determine if the presence of overall pain and tibial pain at the end of the stem differs between cemented and uncemented tibial stems in revision TKA. Methods. This was a retrospective cohort study comparing patients who underwent revision TKA utilizing cemented or uncemented tibial stems in a 15-year period at a single institution with at least two-year follow-up. Exclusion criteria included age under 18, isolated revisions of the femoral component or polyethylene exchanges, lack of preoperative or postoperative imaging, insufficient operative or implant records available for electronic chart review, revision procedures performed at outside facilities, patients who were deceased at the time of survey administration, refusal to participate in the study, and failure to return the mailed survey or respond to a telephone follow-up questionnaire. Radiographic analysis included calculation of the percentage of the tibial canal filled with the implant, as well as measurement of the diameter of the tibial stem. Radiographs were also reviewed for evidence of cavitary defects, pedestal formation, radiolucent lines, and periprosthetic fractures. Mailed surveys addressing overall pain, tibial pain, and satisfaction were analyzed using Fisher's exact test and the independent sample t-test. Logistic regression was used to adjust for age, gender, and preoperative bone loss. Results. A total of 110 patients were included (63 cemented and 47 uncemented stems). No statistically significant differences in stem length, operative side, or indications for revision were found. The uncemented group had a significantly higher percent canal fill (p < 0.0001). Tibial pain at the end of the stem was present in 25.3% of cemented stems and 25.5% of uncemented stems (p = 1.00). There was a trend towards more overall pain in the uncemented cohort, but this did not reach statistical significance. Only 74.6% of cemented patients and 78.7% of uncemented patients were satisfied following revision TKA (p = 0.66). Conclusion. The data supports our hypothesis that there are no differences in end-of-stem pain or overall pain between cemented and uncemented tibial stems in revision TKA. High rates of dissatisfaction were noted in both cohorts postoperatively, consistent with previous literature. Patient factors likely play a large role in the presence of postoperative pain. These factors should be further evaluated in future studies in an effort to reduce pain and improve patient satisfaction