Introduction:. Hallux surgery is the most commonly performed elective surgery in the foot and ankle. As with all surgery, there are many potential complications quoted in the literature. Venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) incidence and prophylaxis, however, is not adequately addressed and remains controversial. Material and Method:. This prospective study includes one hundred patients who underwent hallux surgery. Risk factors implicated to increase the risk of developing venous thromboembolic disease as well as anaesthetic time, thigh tourniquet time and regional anaesthetic blocks were documented. Compressive ultrasonography was performed in all the patients postoperatively to assess for deep vein thrombosis. Results:. There was one incident of calf deep vein thrombosis (DVT). No patient developed a pulmonary embolus. The one patient who developed a DVT was not at any higher risk than the average patient in the study. Conclusion:. As a result of the low incidence of venous thromboembolic disease in this study, the authors do not recommend the routine use of chemical venous thrombo-prophylaxis in patients undergoing hallux surgery. The decision to give postoperative anticoagulation remains the surgeon's responsibility. The duration of prophylaxis will depend on when the patient is fully mobile

Thromboembolic complications following lower limb arthroplasty are reported to be high. The aim of this of this study is to ascertain the incidence of symptomatic venous thromboembolic disease following lower limb arthroplasty without Pharmacological thrombo prophylaxis. Retrospective review was undertaken of 752 patients following total hip or total knee replacement between January 1. st. 2002 and June 30. th. 2005. Fifty one patients were considered high risk and received thrombopharmacologal prophylaxis with Clexane and Warfarin. Information on all patients was obtained from medical records, computerised information system, general practitioners and patients themselves to produce a complete picture of the three months immediately following the index arthroplasty. All patients who presented with calf symptoms suggestive of venous thrombosis, respiratory distress or died in that three months were investigated. Two patients were lost to follow up. All others had full documentation. Twenty-nine patients presented with calf related symptoms and after ultrasound investigation nine (five THR, four TKR) were confirmed to have venous thrombosis and were treated. One of these patients developed tense haemarthrosis while on treatment. Twelve other patients presented with respiratory symptoms. Eight (six THR two TKR) were confirmed to have pulmonary embolism on either VQ scan or spiral CT. Four of these on VQ scan were low probability. All patients were treated for thromboembolic disease and while on treatment one patient developed persistent wound discharge and infection. Of the 51 patients treated with pharmacological prophylaxis one developed a DVT and five developed wound problems, one of which was major. Two patients died during the three month period, but neither was related to thromboembolic disease. From the 699 patients the symptomatic DVT rate was 1.1%. Symptomatic pulmonary embolism rate was 1.5% including the low probability of VQ scans. There was no mortality from thromboembolism in this study. These results compare favourably with the recent literature. Our department has a policy to select patients for thromboembolic prophylaxis based on high risk factors. All other patients are fully informed of this risk and are treated with elevation, avoidance of swelling, early supervised and regular mobilisation. Our result from this study substantiate our policy for selection of patients for thromboembolic prophylaxis

Thromboembolic disease is associated with a high degree of morbidity and mortality. There is increasing pressure for elective orthopaedic patients, including those undergoing foot and ankle surgery, to be prescribed chemical thromboprophylaxis post-operatively in order to reduce the risk of a thromboembolic event. The risks of chemical thromboprophylaxis in terms of increased bleeding, wound problems and HIT are well documented. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of clinically significant thromboembolic events in patients undergoing elective foot and ankle surgery with and without the use of aspirin. We audited a consecutive series of 1625 patients undergoing elective foot and ankle surgery between 2003 and 2010. Between 2003 and 2006 inclusive, aspirin was used post operatively as chemical thromboprohylaxsis. Between 2007 and 2010, no chemical thromboprohylaxsis was used. The follow-up period for all patients was at least three months post-operatively. Most patients were reviewed at 3 months by the senior surgeon. Those who were reviewed less than 3 months (patients undergoing minor procedures) were contacted via telephone to confirm whether a thromboembolic event had been diagnosed. There was no loss to follow up. Of the 1625 patients, 555 patients received aspirin and 1070 patients received no chemical thromboprohylaxsis. 5 of 1625 (0.31%) patients developed a clinically significant thromboembolic event. 3 patients developed a DVT at an average time of 5 weeks post operatively. 2 patients developed non-fatal PE at an average time of 7 weeks post operatively. 3 of the 5 thromboembolic events occurred in the aspirin group (all DVT's) whereas 2 of the 5 (all PE) developed in the non aspirin group. The incidence of clinically significant thromboembolic events is low in elective orthopaedic foot and ankle surgery. We suggest that the benefit of chemical thromboprophylaxis does not outweigh its potential risks in foot and ankle surgery

Background. Thromboembolic disease is a common complication of total hip replacement (THR). The administration of postoperative anticoagulants is therefore highly recommended. The purpose of this study was to compare rivaroxaban with fondaparinux with regards to their safety and effectiveness for the prevention of venous thromboembolic events (VTE) after THR. Methods. We conducted an independent prospective study comparing VTE prevention strategies in two successive series of patients (Groups A and B) undergoing elective unilateral THR. Group A (n=253) received fondaparinux daily 2.5 mg for 10 days, followed by tinzaparin 4500 IU daily for one month. Group B (n=229) received 10 mg rivaroxaban daily for 40 days without platelet monitoring. All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon under general anesthesia using an active blood transfusion-sparing plan. In the absence of contraindications, patients received intra-operative administration of tranexamic acid to reduce postoperative bleeding. Preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin levels were recorded at regular intervals. Bleeding events were documented. The bleeding index was calculated by adding the number of red blood cell units and the difference in the hemoglobin level (in g/dL) between the first morning after the day of surgery and the seventh postoperative day (POD 7). After 5 to 10 days, all patients underwent bilateral lower-extremity duplex ultrasonography to screen for deep venous thrombi. Any clinical symptoms of pulmonary embolism were evaluated with spiral computed tomography lung scans. Clinical evaluation to look for evidence of deep venous thrombi and pulmonary emboli was performed at eight weeks postoperatively. Results. Baseline characteristics between the two groups were comparable. The rate of major bleeding events, proximal deep venous thrombi, and pulmonary emboli was nil in each group. The incidence of blood transfusion was 0.8% in Group A (2 of 253 hips) and 0.4% (1 of 229 hips) in Group B (p=1.0). The bleeding index analysis excluded 8 hips for which the hemoglobin value at POD 7 was not measured. The bleeding index was 1.03 (standard deviation, 0.88) in Group A and 0.8 (standard deviation, 0.80) in Group B (p<0.001). The incidence of bleeding index >2 was 10.5% (27 of 247 hips) in Group A and 3% (7 of 227 hips) in Group B (p<0.001). Discussion. We compared two series of patients treated with THR undertaken with postoperative anticoagulation to prevent VTE. The high level of success these anticoagulant treatments had at preventing VTE in our series could be attributed at least partially to the combination of an active blood-sparing transfusion plan with the use of anticoagulant molecules reported in the literature to be quite potent. Conclusions. This prospective study comparing two anticoagulant regimens in patients treated with THR did not detect any difference with regards to the efficacy of the treatments, although there was significantly less bleeding index in patients who received rivaroxaban

Purpose

The frequency of venous thrombo-embolism (VTE) after total hip arthroplasty(THA) is 20–30% and it is serious complication under THA. Therefore it is necessary to detect and prevent VTE. The purpose of this study were examined the frequency of VTE and the factor of incidence of VTE in our hospital.

Aim

To investigate the incidence, types and trends in diagnosis of venous thromboembolic events (VTE) in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) over a ten-year period.

To compare the efficacy of intra-articular and intravenous modes of administration of tranexamic acid in primary total knee arthroplasty in terms of blood loss and fall in haemoglobin level. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. Duration of Study: Six months, from May 2019 to Nov 2019. Seventy-eight patients were included in the study. All patients undergoing unilateral primary total knee replacement were included in the study. Exclusion criteria were patients with hepatitis B and C, history of previous knee replacement, bilateral total knee replacement, allergy to TXA, Hb less than 11g/dl in males and less than 10g/dl in females, renal dysfunction, use of anticoagulants for 7 days prior to surgery and history of thromboembolic diseases. Patients were randomly divided into group A and B. Group A patients undergoing unilateral primary total knee replacement (TKR) were given intravenous tranexamic acid (TXA) while group B were infiltrated with intra-articular TXA. Volume of drain output, fall in haemoglobin (Hb) level and need for blood transfusion were measured immediately after surgery and at 12 and 24 hours post operatively in both groups. The study included 35 (44.87%) male and 43 (55.13%) female patients. Mean age of patients was 61 ± 6.59 years. The mean drain output calculated immediately after surgery in group A was 45.38 ± 20.75 ml compared with 47.95 ± 23.86 ml in group B (p=0.73). At 24 hours post operatively, mean drain output was 263.21 ± 38.50 ml in intravenous group versus 243.59 ± 70.73 ml in intra-articular group (p=0.46). Regarding fall in Hb level, both groups showed no significant difference (p>0.05). About 12.82% (n=5) patients in group A compared to 10.26% (n=4) patients required blood transfusion post operatively (p=0.72). Intra-articular and intravenous TXA are equally effective in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty in reducing post-operative blood loss

The October 2014 Research Roundup. 360 . looks at: unpicking syndesmotic injuries: CT scans evaluated; surgical scrub suits and sterility in theatre; continuous passive motion and knee injuries; whether pain at night is melatonin related;venous thromboembolic disease following spinal surgery; clots in lower limb plasters; immune-competent cells in Achilles tendinopathy; and infection in orthopaedics

Background. There remains a paucity of clinical studies on the effects of coronavirus on perioperative outcomes, with no existing trials reporting on risk factors associated with increased risk of postoperative mortality in these patients. The objectives of this study were to assess perioperative complications and identify risk factors for increased mortality in patients with coronavirus undergoing surgery. Methods. This multicentre cohort study included 340 coronavirus negative patients versus 82 coronavirus positive patients undergoing surgical treatment for neck of femur fractures across nine NHS hospitals within Greater London, United Kingdom. Predefined study outcomes relating to patient demographics, fracture configuration, operative treatment, perioperative complications and mortality were recorded by observers using a standardised data collection proforma. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to identify risk factors associated with increased risk of mortality. Findings. Coronavirus positive patients had increased risk of postoperative complications (89.0% vs 35.0%, p<0.001), higher rates of admission to high dependency and intensive care units (61.0% vs 18.2%, p<0.001), and increased length of hospital stay (13.8 ± 4.6 days vs 6.7 ± 2.5 days, p<0.001) compared to coronavirus negative patients. Postoperative complications in coronavirus positive patients included respiratory infections (13.4%), thromboembolic disease (13.4%), acute kidney injury (12.2%), and multi-organ dysfunction (12.2%). Coronavirus positive patients had increased risk of postoperative mortality (30.5% vs 10.3%, p<0.001) compared to coronavirus negative patients, with positive smoking status (Hazard ratio: 15.4 (95% CI: 4.55–52.2, p<0.001) and greater than three comorbidities (Hazard ratio: 13.5 (95% CI: 2.82–66.0, p<0.001) associated with increased risk of mortality. Interpretation. Surgery in coronavirus positive patients was associated with increased length of hospital stay, more admissions to the critical care unit, higher risk of perioperative complications and increased mortality compared to coronavirus negative patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that smoking and multiple pre-existing comorbidities were associated with increased risk of postoperative mortality

Although a number of agents have been shown to reduce the risk of thromboembolic disease, their use in total hip replacement (THR) remains controversial. Uncertainty exists regarding the safety of chemical prophylaxis as well as the choice of the most effective agent. Previous studies suggested that pneumatic compression with foot-pumps provide the best balance of safety and effectiveness, however too few patients were investigated in randomised clinical trials to draw evidence-based conclusions. The purpose of this randomized clinical trial was to compare the safety and efficacy of pneumatic compression with foot-pumps versus low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for prophylaxis against DVT. Inclusion criteria were hip osteoarthritis and age less than 80 years. Exclusion criteria were history of thromboembolic disease, heart disease, and bleeding diatheses. 216 consecutive patients were considered for inclusion in the trial and were randomized either for management with LMWH (Fraxiparin, Sanofi-Synthelabo, France) or with the A-V Impulse foot-pump (Orthofix Vascular Novamedix, UK). Patients were monitored for DVT using serial duplex sonography and phlebography. DVT was detected in 3 of 100 patients managed with the foot-pump compared with 6 of 100 patients who received chemical prophylaxis (p< .05). Sixteen patients did not tolerate continuous use of the foot-pump and were excluded from the study. The average postoperative drainage was 259ml in the foot-pump group and 328ml in the LMWH group (p< .05). Patients with foot-pump had less swelling of the thigh (10mm compared with 15mm) (p< .05). The patients of the foot-pump group had less postoperative oozing and bruising than did those who had received LMWH. One patient developed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. This study confirms the safety and efficacy of mechanical prophylaxis of DVT in THR. Some patients cannot tolerate the foot-pump

Introduction Venous thromboembolic disease is a serious complication of total hip replacement (THR). Use of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) has been shown to reduce the occurrence of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) significantly, but side effects such as bleeding and thrombocytopenia are frequent. Pneumatic compression with foot-pumps seems to provide the best balance of effectiveness and safety. However, a recent meta-analysis showed that the overall number of patients investigated in randomised clinical trials is too small to draw evidence-based conclusions regarding mechanical prophylaxis of DVT. This trial is a contribution in comparing the effectiveness and safety of mechanical versus chemical prophylaxis of DVT in patients managed with THR. Methods Inclusion criteria were hip osteoarthritis, age less than 80 years, and uninterrupted use of a foot-pump. Exclusion criteria were a history of thromboembolic disease, heart disease, malignancy and bleeding diatheses. Two hundred and sixteen consecutive patients were considered for inclusion in the trial and were randomized either for management with (LMWH) (Fraxiparin, Sanofi -Synthelabo, France) or with the A-V Impulse foot-pump (Orthofix Vascular Novamedix, UK). All patients started mobilisation on crutches with partial weight-bearing on day two using compression stockings. The foot-pump was applied on both feet in the recovery room and was used until patient discharge. Management with the foot-pump was interrupted only during physiotherapy and toileting. A reverse Trendelenburg position (head-high, feet-low) was applied at rest to enhance the pneumatic effect of the pumps. Patients were monitored for DVT using serial duplex sonography (Sonoline Elegra, Siemens, Germany) at day three, 10 and 45 after surgery. Results DVT was detected in three of 100 patients managed with the foot-pump compared with six of 100 patients who received chemical prophylaxis. Sixteen patients did not tolerate continuous use of the foot-pump and were excluded from the study. The average post-operative drainage was 259 ml in the foot-pump group and 328 ml in the control group (p=0.05). Patients with foot-pump had less swelling of the thigh (10 mm compared with 15 mm) (p=0.05). One patient developed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Conclusions This study confirms the effectiveness and safety of mechanical prophylaxis of DVT in THR, confirming the outcomes of previous randomized clinical trials. Some patients cannot tolerate the foot-pump, mostly because of sleep disturbance. In relation to the conduct of this study, one or more of the authors is in receipt of a research grant from a non-commercial source

Pathologic fractures about the hip are an uncommon, but increasingly prevalent, clinical scenario encountered by orthopaedic surgeons. These fractures about the hip usually necessitate operative management. Life expectancy must be taken into account in management, but if survivorship is greater than 1 month, operative intervention is indicated. Determination must be made prior to operative management if the lesion is a solitary or metastatic lesion. Imaging of the entire femur is necessary to determine if there are other lesions present. Bone lesions that have a large size, permeative appearance, soft tissue mass, and rapid growth are all characteristics that suggest an aggressive lesion. Biopsy of the lesion in coordination with the operative surgeon should be conducted if the primary tumor is unknown. Metastatic disease is much more common than primary tumors in the adult population. Many metastatic fractures in the intertrochanteric region, and all fractures in the femoral neck and head are an indication for hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty. Cemented femoral implants are generally indicated. This allows immediate weight bearing in a bone with compromised bone stock, thus reducing the risk of peri-operative fractures. Additionally, patients are often treated with radiation and/or chemotherapy, which may prevent proper osseointegration of an ingrowth femoral component. Highly porous ingrowth shells have been shown to provide reliable and durable fixation even in these situations. Management of a periacetabular pathologic fracture, particularly resulting in a pelvic discontinuity is a particularly challenging situation. Use of a highly porous acetabular component combined with an acetabular cage, a custom acetabular component, a cemented Harrington technique, or a primary acetabular reconstruction cage may be utilised. Patients with neoplastic disease are often at risk for infection and thromboembolic disease both from the disease and treatment. Pre-operative evaluation of nutrition status by measuring albumin and pre-albumin will give the surgeon insight. Additionally, dehydration is commonly seen in cancer patients, and adequate pre-operative optimization of fluids and electrolytes may reduce peri-operative complications from other organ systems

Tranexamic Acid (TXA) is widely used to decrease bleeding by its antifibrinolytic mechanism. Its use is widespread within orthopaedic surgery, with level one evidence for its efficacy in total hip and knee replacement surgery; significantly reducing transfusion rates without increased thromboembolic disease. There is limited evidence for its use during hip fracture surgery, and we therefore sought to investigate its effects with a prospective cohort study. We recorded intra-operative blood loss, pre and post-operative haemoglobin and creatinine levels, post-operative complications and mortality in all hip fracture patients over a six month period. During this time, we introduced one gram of TXA into our standardised hip fracture theatre checklist. It was subsequently given to all patients unless contra-indicated. A total of 99 patients were included. 90-day mortality in the control group was 16%, there was no mortality in the TXA group (p<0.05). 14 patients required a transfusion in the control group and 3 in the TXA group (19% vs 11% transfusion rate, 0.36 units RCC vs 0.22 per patient respectively) Mean blood loss was 338 vs 235mls, Haemoglobin drop 23 vs 18g/dl control and TXA groups respectively. We have demonstrated a significantly lower mortality rate with TXA. We have also shown lower rates of transfusion, blood loss and recorded haemoglobin drop with the use of TXA. We intend to continue this study to demonstrate this significantly, and fully clarify the safety profile of TXA in this frail cohort of patients

Thromboembolic disease (TED) remains as a major concern for orthopaedic surgeons and is a well-known complication of lower extremity joint replacement procedures. While there is voluminous literature on the topic, it is difficult for the average orthopaedic surgeon to keep up with all the advancements in this area as well as the newer pharmacological options for prophylaxis. To address this, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) has developed a clinical practice guideline (CPG) in this area to provide treatment recommendations based on the best available evidence. Historically, guidelines for TED prophylaxis have been based largely on randomised controlled trials whose outcome measure was venographically documented deep vein thrombosis (DVT). However, many venographically documented DVTs, particularly those distal to the popliteal vein, are of no clinical consequence. Therefore, in the AAOS CPG the systematic review of the literature was focused on those outcomes that have the most clinical relevance: all-cause mortality, symptomatic or fatal pulmonary embolism (PE), proximal DVT, major bleeding and symptomatic DVT rates. Using these as the clinically important endpoints, it is evident that the extant literature is insufficient to provide definitive guidance in this area and to make specific recommendations about optimal pharmacological prophylaxis. Nonetheless, one strong recommendation has emerged from this systematic review: the guideline recommended against routine post-operative duplex ultrasonography screening of patients who undergo elective hip or knee arthroplasty. Only one risk factor – previous history of TED – had evidence demonstrating a higher risk beyond the risk from elective hip or knee arthroplasty itself (weak recommendation). There was not sufficient evidence that other potential risk factors increase the risk of TED, likely because of the relatively high background risk of elective hip or knee arthroplasty. In addition, there is very little evidence defining populations at increased risk for bleeding and bleeding-associated complications associated with pharmacological prophylaxis. However, the panel did come to a consensus that patients with known bleeding disorders or active liver disease are at an increased risk for post-operative bleeding. In these circumstances, it is recommended that mechanical compressive devices be the primary modality of prophylaxis as pharmacologic prophylaxis may increase the risk of bleeding. There was a moderate strength recommendation for the superiority of neuraxial anesthesia to limit blood loss even though there is no demonstrable effect on the incidence of TED. Finally, there was a moderate grade recommendation that pharmacologic agents (including aspirin) and/or mechanical compression devices be utilised for the prevention of VTE in patients that are undergoing elective hip or knee arthroplasty who are not at elevated risk beyond that of the surgery itself for VTE or bleeding. Clearly there is great need for better evidence with appropriately powered studies that examine the most clinically relevant outcomes in TED prophylaxis

Tranexamic Acid (TA) has been shown to reduce transfusion rates in Total Knee Replacement (TKR) without complication. In our unit it was added to our routine enhanced recovery protocol. No other changes were made to the protocol at this time and as such we sought to examine the effects of TA on wound complication and transfusion rate. All patients undergoing primary TKR over a 12 month period were identified. Notes and online records were reviewed to collate demographics, length of stay, use of TA, thromboprophylaxis, blood transfusion, wound complications and haemoglobin levels. All patients received a Columbus navigated TKR with a tourniquet. Only patients who received 14 days of Dalteparin for thromboprophylaxis were included. 124 patients were included, 72 receiving TA and 52 not. Mean age was 70. Four patients required a blood transfusion all of whom did not receive TA (p = 0.029). Mean change in Hb was 22 without TA and 21 with (p = 0.859). Mean length of stay was 6.83 days without Tranexamic Acid and 5.15 with (p < 0.001). 15% of patients (n=11) of the TA group had a wound complication, with 40% of patients (n=21) in the non TA group (p = 0.003). There was one ultrasound confirmed DVT (non TA group). No patients were diagnosed with pulmonary embolus. In our unit we have demonstrated a significantly lower transfusion rate, wound complication rate and length of stay, without any significant increase in thromboembolic disease with the use of TA in TKR

My goal for every patient undergoing THA is to achieve a perfect result. At the very least this includes no pain at any time, normal range of motion, normal functionality and a minimal chance of a second operation. Both the Posterolateral Approach (PLA) and the Direct Anterior Approach (DAA) have the capability of achieving these important goals. However, when you dive deeper into the goal of a “perfect” THA, some differences between the approaches become apparent. These include less muscle damage, faster recovery, and no restrictions at any time with the DAA as opposed to the PLA. Also there is some evidence of better wound healing (Poehling) and less chance of thromboembolic disease with the DAA (Stryker). The PLA violates all posterior structures of the hip joint, and specifically also goes through the gluteus maximus muscle. Done properly, the DAA spares all the gluteal muscles, and all of the posterior muscles about the hip. Bergin, who demonstrated lower levels of creatine kinase using the DAA vs PLA, has provided evidence of lower muscle damage. Faster recovery patterns have been well documented after DAA (Christen, Taunton). Part of this may be related to not needing hip precautions after DAA, while PLA patients are restricted in certain activities and positions in the postoperative period, because of the violation of the posterior capsule. Not having any restrictions enhances patient confidence, and patients tend to do more activities sooner with less reluctance and a subsequent faster recovery. It is my belief that DAA problems (outside the learning curve) are related to the dependence upon special tables and fluoroscopy, as opposed to proper exposure, to perform a DAA. If you don't test hip stability in the OR, you will miss subtle impingement that can lead to postoperative dislocation. If you depend upon fluoroscopy to guide acetabular reaming (without proper exposure), you run the risk of over-reaming or asymmetric reaming with dire consequences. If you don't measure leg length directly, but rely on fluoroscopic measurements, you run the risk of inadvertent leg lengthening

Background. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common, costly, and morbid complication following TJA. Consequently, the current standard of care recommends that all TJA candidates receive some form of thromboprophylaxis postoperatively. Chemoprophylaxis, however, is not without its own risks and has been associated with greater risk of perioperative complications such as major bleeding, infection, stroke, and increased wound drainage. Mechanical compression devices serve as an alternative to chemoprophylaxis. Compression devices are thought to function by decreasing venous stasis and activating fibrinolysis. Intermittent pneumatic compression devices (IPCD) function by providing pressure at a constant cycle; whereas continuous enhanced circulation therapy (CECT) devices such as ActiveCare portable system (Medical Compression Systems, Or Akiva, Israel) function in a synchronized manner with the patient's own respiratory cycles. While both of these systems are widely utilized, there is scarce data comparing their effectiveness as thromboprophylatic agents following TJA. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to comparatively evaluate the efficacy of ActiveCare to IPCDs in the prevention of thromboembolic events following TJA. Methods. A literature search using PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases were used to identify all articles published between January 2000 and August 2016. Key words used to conduct the search were venous foot pump, intermittent pneumatic compression, total hip arthroplasty/replacement, total knee arthroplasty/replacement, deep vein thrombosis, thromboembolic disease and pulmonary emboli. Two independent investigators carried out the literature review using the PRISMA guidelines (Figure 1). Analysis of risk ratio was performed by evaluation of studies which compared IPCD with any control chemoprophylaxis regiment or ActiveCare with any control chemoprophlaxis regiment. Assessment of heterogeneity and analysis of data were operated by Review Manager 5.3. Results. Our primary search protocol yielded 968 individual studies by both reviewers of which 525 were duplicates. After screening the remaining 443 abstracts for relevancy 357 were excluded, leaving 86 for full text examination. After a thorough evaluation, 60 were further excluded, and a total of 24 studies, published between 2000 and 2014, were included for analysis, representing 9,134 patients. Of these, 13 were randomized controlled trials and 11 were retrospective studies. When compared to control chemoprophylactic groups, the risk ratio (RR) of DVT development was 0.51 (95% CI: 0.39 – 0.67; I. 2. =69%) with NSIPCDs and 0.47 (95% CI: 0.27 – 0.80; I. 2. =0%) with RSCDs. The RR for development of PE in these groups respectively were 0.24 (95% CI: 0.04 – 0.15) versus 0.55 (95% CI: 0.35 – 0.88) (Figure 3). Conclusion. When compared to chemoprophylaxis alone, compression devices appear to reduce the incidence of VTEs following TJA. The addition of mechanical prophylaxis to any chemoprophylactic regimen increased VTED prevention Following a comparative analysis of IPCDs and ActiveCare our study suggests that ActiveCare may be more effective at preventing VTE events, albeit not statistically significant. Thus, our results demonstrate that while both devices are effective thromboprophylactic modalities, more research is warranted to better elucidate the strengths and limitations of compression devices as thromboprophylatic agents. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Hip fractures are a common cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly, with approximately 30,000 hip fractures a year in Canada. Many hip fracture patients are prone to heart failure and present anticoagulated with Warfarin for medical comorbidities including atrial fibrillation or previous thromboembolic disease. Reversal of warfarin anticoagulation to an INR < 1.5 preferred for surgery but this often contributes to a delay to hip fracture surgery, which increases patient pain, morbidity, mortality, and length of stay Octaplex is a small-volume prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) that reverses Warfarin-related anticoagulation in 15–60 minutes. It has been shown to be safe and effective in the management of intracranial and gastrointestinal bleeding in warfarinised patients. It is recommended by Bone and Joint Canada as an option for urgent warfarin reversal in hip fracture patients. However, there has been no published literature on the use of Octaplex or other PCCs in orthopaedic patients. Our objective is to assess the effectiveness of Octaplex for rapid reversal of warfarin anticoagulation in hip fracture patients. A database review of all patients who received Octaplex was performed. Medical records of all hip fracture patients in Calgary who received Octaplex between December 2009 and February 2015 were reviewed. After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 33 patients were identified. A timeline of International Normalised Ratio (INR), Octaplex administration, and hip fracture surgery was recorded. Mortality and complications were assessed at 30 days. A single dose of Octaplex corrected the INR to < 1.5 in 29 cases (88%). Median time from administration of Octaplex to a measured INR < 1.5 was 1.1 hours. Median time from admission to hip fracture surgery was 22 hours. Mortality at 30 days was 15.2%, mostly from cardiac arrest. A further 12% of patients developed cardiac or thrombotic complications. Multiple medical comorbidities were common including coronary artery disease (55%), congestive heart failure (45%), and chronic pulmonary disease (39%). Patients who received both fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and Octaplex for warfarin reversal had much higher mortality than those who only received Octaplex (40% vs 4.3% mortality at 30 days), but also had more medical comorbidities. Octaplex is effective at rapidly reversing warfarin anticoagulation and reducing time to surgery, potentially reducing the morbidity and mortality of hip fractures. Administration of both Octaplex and FFP were associated with higher early mortality in this case series. Further research is required to assess the safety of Octaplex, vitamin K, and FFP for reversal of warfarin anticoagulation in this population

Acute peri-operative blood loss warranting transfusion is a frequent consequence of major joint replacement (TJR) surgery. Significant peri-operative anemia can contribute to hypotension, dyspnea, coronary ischemia and other peri-operative medical events that can result in increased risk of peri-operative complications, readmissions and impair the patient's ability to mobilise after surgery resulting in a longer length of stay (LOS) and increase skilled nursing facility (SNF) utilization. The risks associated with allogeneic blood transfusions (ABT) administered to treat symptomatic peri-operative anemia are numerous and extend beyond the concerns of transmission of communicable disease (HIV, hepatitis, other). Patients receiving ABTs have been shown to have a longer hospital LOS, higher risk of infection, and higher mortality after TJR than those who do not require transfusion after surgery. As a result, many different pre-operative, peri-operative and post-operative strategies have been utilised to minimise peri-operative blood loss and transfusion need for patients undergoing TJR. Several studies have shown that the strongest predictor of the need for ABT in the TJR patient is the pre-operative hematocrit (Hct). As a result, all patients with unexplained pre-operative anemia should be evaluated for an underlying cause prior to elective TJR surgery. In recent years, focus has shifted towards peri-operative reduction of blood loss with the use of pharmacologic agents like tranexamic acid (TXA). These agents work by inhibiting fibrinolysis and activating plasminogen. Numerous studies have shown that TXA given IV, applied topically into the surgical wound or given orally have been shown to reduce peri-operative bleeding and ABT after both THA and TKR. Regardless of route of administration, all appear to be more efficacious and considerably more cost-effective in reducing the need for ABT than other methods discussed previously. Despite concerns about the potential increased thromboembolic risk in patients undergoing TJR, there does not appear to be any conclusive evidence suggesting an increased risk of venous thromboembolic disease (VTED) in TJR patients who receive peri-operative TXA. Although it may be unnecessary, many TJR surgeons still, however, avoid use of TXA in patients with a past history of VTED, stroke, coronary artery disease (including coronary stents), renal insufficiency, hypercoagulable state and seizure disorder. The use of topical TXA may be safer in some of these high risk patients since systemic absorption is minimal when administered via this route. Although the optimal method of administration (IV, topical, oral or combined) has not yet been determined based on safety, cost and reduction of need for ABT, incorporation of tranexamic acid into a blood conservation program is clearly the standard of care for all TJR programs that should nearly eliminate the need for ABT for patients undergoing TJR

The use of foot pumps and graduated compression stockings have been shown in combination to reduce the incidence of thromboembolic disease after total hip arthroplasty. What has not been described is if there combined use is synergistic as all clinical trials use them in combination. We examined the effect that wearing compression stockings had on the ability of foot pumps to accelerate peak venous velocities in the common femoral vein (CFV) of ten healthy volunteers. We measured this effect by duplex scanning the CFV under four conditions: foot pump on or off and stockings on or off. The combination of foot pumps on without stockings led to the greatest increase in peak venous velocity. This represented a 34% increase in efficiency compared to not wearing stockings. It is not known if this difference could account for a reduction in thromboembolic episodes, this could only be answered with a randomised clinical trial