Purpose: The management of radicular pain due to lumbar or sacral nerve root compromise remains controversial. Caudal epidural steroid injections are widely employed although there is little hard evidence to confirm their efficacy. This empirical treatment still remains a matter of personal choice and experience. To investigate the clinical effectiveness of caudal epidural steroid injections (CESIs) in the treatment of sciatica and to identify potential predictors (clinical subgroups) of response to CESIs. Method: Prospective study. All patients with corresponding radicular pain received a course of three caudal epidural steroid injections, two weeks apart. All patients reviewed at three months interval in a dedicated epidural follow up clinic and one-year postal and telephonic follow-up. Exhaustive epidural database maintained. VAS scores documented both axial and limb pain for actual and comparative analysis. ODI and HADS were recorded prior to treatment, at three months follow-up and one year. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome measure was the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ). The Visual analogue score (VAS) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scores (HADS) were also employed in all cases. Results: In the largest single series to date, we report on 928 consecutive patients, with three months follow-up and 354 patients with 12 months follow-up. Fifty-eight percent were females, 24% smoked and 4.1% had ongoing litigation due to their pain. The mean age was 56 years with BMI ranging from 17 to 50 (mean=28). Ten (0.6%) patients required subsequent surgical intervention due to disc herniation. The mean VAS, ODI and HADS improved significantly at three months and one-year results were encouraging. Conclusion: Significant improvement in both axial and limb pain in the short and intermediate terms achieved facilitating onward referral for physical therapy. Subgroups predicting poor outcome are identified. Positive primary care feedback encourages further recruitment

Summary. Application of RSA in supine and standing positions allows pelvic fracture stability to be measured more accurately than current techniques. RSA may enable a better understanding of these injuries. Introduction. The in vivo stability of the pelvic ring after fracture stabilisation remains unknown. Plain radiographs have a low accuracy in diagnosing loss of fracture reduction over time. Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is an accurate imaging measurement method that has previously been applied to measure the healing of other fractures. This pilot study investigated the potential application of RSA in supine and standing positions to measure pelvic fracture stability over time and under weightbearing load. Methods. Five patients with a similar type C pelvic ring disruption who were all operated on using the same surgical technique and had RSA markers inserted at the time of surgery. All five patients had a unilateral comminuted sacral fracture lateral to the sacral foramina treated with posterior plating and pubic rami fractures stabilised by external fixation for six weeks. All patients were mobilised partial weight bearing after regaining leg control. RSA examinations at 2, 4, 12, 26 and 52 weeks included three radiographic pairs taken in supine, standing and supine positions at each time point. Two additional RSA examinations were performed the day prior and post pin removal at 6 weeks. Results. All patients ambulated before the 2 week follow-up and progressed uneventfully. At latest follow-up, there were no complications. Minimal displacements (translations less than 0.3mm and rotations less than 0.5°) were recorded between the supine exams pre and post standing at 2 weeks. Hence, the supine examination was found to be a reliable position to measure the migration of the ilium over time. No loss of reduction was identifiable on plain radiographs over time. At 52 weeks, in contrast to plain radiographic results, RSA measurements revealed that one patient had a fracture migration greater than 4mm. Such large displacements could result in sacral nerve root transection, leading to devastating consequences, such as incontinence, for patients whose sacral fractures are through or medial to the sacral foramina. In one patient, the migration recorded for the apparent uninjured posterior complex side exceeded the migration of the injured side suggesting an unrecognised bilateral injury. Comparative RSA examinations pre and post external fixator removal demonstrated that in three patients the injured hemipelvis migrated greater than 2mm after the removal of the external fixator, which may be indicative that the fixator was removed prematurely. Discussion and Conclusion. The application of RSA allows accurate measurement of pelvic fracture stability which is difficult, if not impossible, to identify and quantify with any other imaging techniques. Hence, RSA has the capacity to enable a better understanding of pelvic ring injuries and optimise their treatment

Background: The management of radicular pain due to lumbar or sacral nerve root compromise remains controversial. Caudal epidural steroid injections are widely employed although there is little hard evidence to confirm their efficacy. This empirical treatment still remains a matter of personal choice and experience. Objectives: To investigate the clinical effectiveness of caudal epidural steroid injections (CESIs) in the treatment of sciatica and to identify potential predictors (clinical subgroups) of response to CESIs. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome measure was the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ). The Visual analogue score (VAS) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scores (HADS) were also employed in all cases to measure pain relief, physical and psychological function. Method: Prospective study. All patients with corresponding radicular pain received a course of three caudal epidural steroid injections, two weeks apart. A standard mixture of 80 mgs of triamcinalone plus 7 mls of 1% lignocaine plus 5 mls of 0.9% saline used for all patients. All patients reviewed at 3 months interval in a dedicated epidural follow up clinic. The epidural database included age, BMI, duration of symptoms, smoking, employment status and source of referral, any pending litigation, i.e., work or accident related, MRI results, diagnosis and complications. VAS scores documented both axial and limb pain for actual and comparative analysis. ODI and HADS were recorded prior to treatment and at three months follow up. Overall patient satisfaction was recorded on a scale of 0–10 and complications noted. Results: In the largest single series to date, we report on 628 consecutive patients, with 3 months follow up. 58 % were females, 24% smoked and 4.1% had ongoing litigation due to their pain. The mean age was 56yrs with BMI ranging from 17 to 50 (mean=28). 7 (1%) patients required subsequent surgical intervention due to disc herniation. BMI did not affect the outcome. Mean VAS for axial pain reduced from 5.859 to 2.59 at three months. Mean VAS for limb pain similarily reduced from 6.23 to 2.53. Mean ODI reduced from 45.49 at first visit to 21.98 at 3 months. Mean HADS also improved from 17 to 7. Following treatment, overall Patient satisfaction ranged from 0–10 with mean of 5.4. Conclusion: Significant improvement in both axial and limb pain in the short and intermediate terms was achieved facilitating onward referral for physical therapy, which is fundamental in optimising outcomes. Long term follow-up is underway. Subgroups predicting poor outcome are identified. Positive primary care feedback encourages further recruitment

The February 2015 Spine Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Paracetamol use for lower back pain; En-bloc resection of vertebra reported for the first time; Spinopelvic disassociation under the spotlight; Hope for back pain; Disc replacement and ACDF equivalent in randomised study; Interspinous process devices ineffective