Introduction: Clear cell sarcoma is a very rare tumor of the tissues described also as melanoma of the tissues. It is a low-grade tumor mostly located in the hand. Aim: To present 3 patients with this rare tumor located in the hand and to describe the therapy, which is wide or radical excision after control of the local lymphnodes. Methods-materials: We present three patients treated in our department the last 3 years. The tumor was located at the ring finger, the little finger and in the thenar. All the patients primary were treated at an other center with insufficient removal of the tumor. At the time they presented in our department they all had local recurrence. At our hospital after control of the local lymphnodes (with MRI or scanning), which was negative, two patients were treated with
Introduction. Hand tumors are usually rare and there is not much literature about series of cases. We have studied a series of 110 cases. Hand tumors do consists of both benign and malignant cases. Methods. We studied series of 110 cases at Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubli and Mysore Medical College & Research Institute, Mysore. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 110 patients who underwent double
Tenosynovial giant cell tumour (TGCT) is a rare benign tumour of the musculoskeletal system. Surgical management is fraught with challenges due to high recurrence rates. The aim of this study was to describe surgical treatment and evaluate surgical outcomes of TGCT at an Australian tertiary referral centre for musculoskeletal tumours and to identify factors affecting recurrence rates. A prospective database of all patients with TGCT surgically managed by two orthopaedic oncology surgeons was reviewed. All cases irrespective of previous treatment were included and patients without follow-up were excluded. Pertinent tumour characteristics and surgical outcomes were collected for analysis.Aims
Methods
Foot osteomyelitis is a common problem for which management is variable and few guidelines exist. To present our treatment protocol and the results in 36 patients (20 men, 16 women, mean age: 49.5 years) with osteomyelitis distal to the ankle, followed up for 17.6 months (range: 3–64). Bone infection involved toes (n=4), lesser metatarsals (n=11), hallux (n=3), midfoot (n=4), calcaneus (n=9), whereas 4 cases presented as generalised osteomyelitis. Postoperative infection was the cause in 10 cases. Eleven patients were classified as host-type A, 14 as B and 11 as C. A draining sinus was present in 28 cases. The treatment protocol included surgical debridement, the bead-pouch technique for local antibiotic administration and closure primarily (n=27), or by secondary healing (n=5), skin graft (n=2), local fasciocutaneous (n=1), or free vascularised muscle flap (n=1). Systemic antibiotics according to cultures were administered for 5–7 days. Generalized Charcot osteomyelitis was an indication for amputation. Mean hospital stay was 13.8 days (range 1–34) and 2.7 (range 1–7) surgical procedures per patient were recorded. Infection control was achieved in 26 cases (72.2%), whereas amputations were performed in 10 cases (27.8%). Below-knee amputation was undertaken in 4 host-type C patients with Charcot osteomyelitis of the foot.
Twenty cases of malignant sarcomas of the foot and ankle included: four osteosarcomas, three Ewing’s sarcomas, three chondrosarcomas, three fibrosarcomas, five synovial cell sarcomas, one clear cell sarcoma and one malignant schwannoma. Five-year survival was: three of the nine who had B-K amputation, five of the nine who had more distal amputation or local resection, for a total of eight of eighteen. More distal amputation than B-K or local resection was offered if plantar sensation and stability of the foot could be retained, and was accepted by half of the patients. There were no local recurrences of eighteen operated. Twenty cases of malignant sarcomas of the foot and ankle seen over a ten-year period from 1985 to 1995 were reviewed retrospectively. Eleven tumors arose from bone and nine from soft tissue. The bone tumors were: four osteosarcomas, three Ewing’s sarcomas, three chondrosarcomas, and one fibrosarcoma. The soft tissue sarcomas were: five synovial cell sarcomas, two fibrosarcomas, one clear cell sarcoma and one malignant schwannoma. The average age for all patients was twenty-four years. Two patients presented with chest metastases, both had palliative radiation and one had palliative B-K amputation. The surgical treatment given for the eighteen non-metastatic cases was: B-K amputation nine, Symes, Chopart, or
We present the long-term results of a single institute’s experience of the Mann 3 in 1 procedure. This prospective study initially selected 36 feet (25 patients) with severe hallux valgus, classified by a HV angle <
40° or IM angle>
15°, for the Mann 3 in 1 procedure. Preoperative and postoperative standing radiographs were taken to calculate the correction of the deformity, and a postoperative subjective questionnaire was completed which was based on the assessment criteria suggested by the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society in 1984. The initial follow-up was completed at up to one year. The original cohort of patients was contacted again at 10 years (range 9–11 years) to repeat the same questionnaire and radiographs. In total 19 patients (27 feet) were contactable with an average age of 51 years (range 34–74). The questionnaire revealed one patient unable to perform the same occupation and three patients unable to perform the same activities due to ongoig problems with the operated feet. Thirteen patients had to wear modified footwear but only 2 required specially made shoes. Sixteen of the nineteen (84%) were pleased or satisfied with pain relief and appearance following the procedure, with 14 stating that they would undergo the procedure again given the same circumstance and 5 patients that would not. The complications included 8 patients requiring screw removal, 2 patients with metatarsalgia, one patient undergoing multiple further corrective procedures and one requiring a second
Introduction: A ‘whoops’ procedure is when a lump, which subsequently turns out to be a soft tissue sarcoma (STS), is shelled out by a surgeon who is not aware of the diagnosis. In many cases residual tumour will be left behind necessitating further surgery. The significance of a whoops procedure in terms of survival and local control remains uncertain. This study has used case matched controls to compare outcome between two groups. Method: 794 patients of soft tissue sarcoma with minimum follow up of 5 years were found on our prospectively collected database. 113 were whoops cases, 96 had restaging and reexcision. An observer blinded to the outcome of patients matched the whoops cases with virgins by known prognostic factors i.e. grade, depth, patient age, site, size and diagnosis of the tumour. We have investigated outcome in terms of local control, metastatic disease and survival by known prognostic factors and by their status at presentation. Results: 96 patients with a whoops procedure were compared with 96 referred directly to our unit. Despite attempts to match patients with as many variables as possible there was a tendency for the patients with whoops to have smaller tumours that were subcutaneous, they were however well matched for grade and stage at diagnosis. 64% of whoops patients had adequate final margin whereas only 44% of virgins had adequate margins. Overall 1.43 additional operations were needed to achieve final margins for whoops cases as against 0.21% for virgin cases. Overall 27% patients had amputation 20% for whoops and 34% for virgin cases nearly 60% were
Introduction: Management strategies and results in 30 cases of foot osteomyelitis are presented. Patients-Methods: From 1/2003 – 1/2006, 30 patients (15 men, 15 women, mean age 47.7 years, range 1.5–82) presenting with foot osteomyelitis were treated. Mean hospital stay was 12.6 days (range 1–45) and 1.3 hospital admissions were recorded (range 1–4). The follow-up period averaged 15.7 months (range 3–56). Bone infection involved the toes in 3 cases, the metatarsals in 9, the head of the hallux in 2, the midfoot in 3, the calcaneus in 9, whereas 3 cases presented as generalized charcot’s osteomyelitis. Eleven patients were classified as host-type A, 10 as B and 9 as C. Nine patients were diabetic, one rheumatoid, four had vascular insufficiency, two had insensate feet. An open calacaneal fracture was the cause in two cases, whereas ORIF of a closed calacaneal fracture in one, ORIF of metatarsal fractures in one and hallux valgus corrective surgery in two. One paediatric patient with calcaneal osteomyelitis developed subtalar arthritis. A draining sinus/wound was present in 24 cases. Each patient underwent an average of 2.3 surgical procedures (range 1–7). The treatment protocol included surgical debridement, use of the bead-pouch technique for local antibiotic administration and closure primarily (n=23), or by secondary healing (n=3), skin graft (n=2), local fasciocutaneous (n=1), or free vascularized muscle flap (n=1). Systemic antibiotics according to cultures were administered for 5–7 days. Amputation was undertaken if salvaging or reconstructive procedures could not be undertaken. Results: Infection control (salvageable cases) was achieved in 23 cases (76.7%), whereas amputations were performed in 7 cases (23.3%). Four amputees were classified as host C (57.1%), whereas a significantly lower rate of patients successfully treated (21.7%) were host-C (p=0.0008). A below knee amputation was undertaken in two host-type C patients with generalized osteomyelitis of the foot. One 1st ray and two 1st and 2nd
COVID-19 necessitated abrupt changes in trauma service delivery. We compare the demographics and outcomes of patients treated during lockdown to a matched period from 2019. Findings have important implications for service development. A split-site service was introduced, with a COVID-19 free site treating the majority of trauma patients. Polytrauma, spinal, and paediatric trauma patients, plus COVID-19 confirmed or suspicious cases, were managed at another site. Prospective data on all trauma patients undergoing surgery at either site between 16 March 2020 and 31 May 2020 was collated and compared with retrospective review of the same period in 2019. Patient demographics, injury, surgical details, length of stay (LOS), COVID-19 status, and outcome were compared.Aims
Methods
The December 2015 Foot &
Ankle Roundup360 looks at: The midfoot fusion bolt: has it had its day?; Ankle arthroplasty: only for the old?; A return to the Keller’s osteotomy for diabetic feet?; Joint sparing surgery for ankle arthritis in the context of deformity?; Beware the subtalar fusion in the ankle arthrodesis patient?; Nonunion in the foot and ankle a predictive score; Cast