Introduction and Objective. Evidence in literature is contradicting regarding outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) and whether they are inferior to TKA in primary osteoarthritis (OA). The aim of this review was to find out if any difference exists in the results of TKA between the two indications. Materials and Methods. The electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Collaboration, and PubMed were searched and screened in duplicate for relevant studies. The selected studies were further subjected to quality assessment using the modified Coleman method. The primary outcome measure was patient reported outcome, and secondary outcome measures were infection, revision, stiffness, and patella tendon rupture. Results. A total of 18 studies involved 1129 patients with a mean age of 60.6 years (range 45.7–69) and follow up of 6.3 years. The time interval from index injury to TKA was 9.1 years. Knee Society Score (KSS) in PTOA reported in 12/18 studies showed functional improvement from 42.5 to 70 post-TKA exceeding minimally clinically important difference. In TKA for primary OA vs PTOA, deep peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) was reported in 1.9% vs 5.4% of patients, whilst revision of prosthesis at an average of 6 years post-operatively was performed in 2.6 vs 9.7% of patients. Conclusions. TKA is a successful treatment option for PTOA. However, the risk of significant complications like PJI and implant failure requiring revision is higher than primary OA cases. Patients should be counselled about those risks. Further well-designed comparative cohort-matched studies are needed to compare outcomes between the two populations

Introduction. Fracture around the knee can lead to posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) of the knee. Malunion, malalignment, intra-articular osseous defects, retained internal fixation devices, and compromised soft tissues may affect the outcome of total knee replacement (TKR). On average, the posttraumatic patient subsets were 10.4 years younger than those for primary knee OA. Recently, there were several studies reporting the outcome of THA for posttraumatic OA hip. However, no current literature defines the comparative functional outcome between PTOA and primary OA knee. The purpose of our study was to compare the midterm outcomes of patients undergoing TKR following periarticular knee fractures/ligamentous injuries versus primary osteoarthritis (PO) of the knee. Materials and methods. Retrospective chart reviews of patients underwent TKR between 2008 and 2013 were identified. 136 patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation with plate and screws or ligament reconstruction while 716 patients were primary OA. Mean follow up time was comparable in both groups. Demographic data, medical comorbidities, WOMAC, visual analogue scale, and complications were recorded. Results. There were significantly different in age (56.5 vs 63.8 years, p<0.0001), gender (48.5% vs 63.1% of female, p=0.0014), and obese (62.3% vs 76.0%, p=0.025) between PTOA and PO groups, respectively. The PO group had higher comorbidities than PTOA group including anticoagulant usage (51% vs 30.9%, p=0.0002), number of disease ≥ 4 (69.6% vs 45.3%, p<0.0001), ASA class ≥3 (38.8% vs 21.6%, p<0.0001), and Charlson Comorbidity Index (3.6 vs 2.8, p<0.0001). The PTOA group had longer operative time (110.9 vs 100.1 minutes, p<0.0001) than PO group. Preoperatively anatomical axis of the knee was approximately valgus in PTOA but varus alignment in PO group (p<0.0001). However, postoperatively anatomical and mechanical axis was comparable in both groups. Postoperative VAS (1.8 vs 1.2, p=0.002) at 1 year follow up and pain component of WOMAC (77.8 vs 85.7, p=0.013) in PTOA group was worse than PO group, respectively. On the contrary, there was no difference in postoperative complication and readmission rate between groups. Conclusion. Total knee replacement for Post-traumatic OA was associated with poorer functional outcome compared to those for primary osteoarthritis in midterm follow up

Background: According to the mid-term results obtained from the previous registry-based studies, survival of cementless stems for aseptic loosening in younger patients with primary osteoarthritis has been better than the survival of cemented stems. However, it has not been clear if the endurance against aseptic loosening of cementless cups is comparable to that of cemented cups. The aim of the present study was to analyze population-based long-term survival rates of the cemented and cementless total hip replacements in patients under the age of fifty-five years with primary osteoarthritis in Finland. Patients and Methods: Between 1980 and 2006, a total of 7310 primary total hip replacements performed for primary osteoarthritis in patients under the age of fifty-five years were entered in the Finnish Arthroplasty Registry. 4,032 of them fulfilled our inclusion criteria and were subjected to analysis. The implants included were classified in one of the three following groups: implants with a cementless, straight, proximally circumferentially porous-coated stem and a porous-coated press-fit cup (cementless group #1); implants with a cementless, anatomic, proximally circumferentially porous-coated and/ or hydroxyapatite-coated stem with a porous-coated and/or hydroxyapatite-coated press-fit cup (cementless group #2); and a cemented stem combined with a cemented all-polyethylene cup (the cemented group). Results: Cementless total hip replacements, as well as cementless stems and cups analyzed separately, had a significantly reduced risk of revision for aseptic loosening compared with cemented hip replacements. The 15-year survivorship of cementless stem groups for aseptic loosening was higher than that of cemented stems (89% and 90% vs. 72%). The 15-year survivorship of cementless press-fit porous-coated cups for aseptic loosening was higher than that of cemented cups (80% vs. 71%). When revision for any reason was the end point in survival analyses, however, there were no significant differences among the groups. Conclusions: Both cementless stems and cementless cups have better resistance to aseptic loosening than cemented implants in long term follow-up in younger patients. Even if liner-exchange revisions are taken into account, the long-term survival of cementless total hip replacements is comparable to that of cemented implants

Results in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) for femoral head osteonecrosis (ON) when compared with primary osteoarthritis (OA) are controversial. Different factors like age, THA type or surgical technique may affect outcome. We hypothesized that patients with ON had an increased revision rate compared with OA. We analysed clinical outcome, estimated the survival rate for revision surgery, and their possible risk factors, in two groups of patients. In this retrospective cohort analysis of our prospective database, we assessed 2464 primary THAs implanted between 1989 and 2017. Patients with OA were included in group 1, 2090 hips; and patients with ON in group 2, 374 hips. In group 2 there were more men (p<0.001), patients younger than 60 years old (p<0.001) and with greater physical activity (p<0.001). Patients with lumbar OA (p<0.001) and a radiological acetabular shape type B according to Dorr (p<0.001) were more frequent in group 1. Clinical outcome was assessed according to the Harris Hip Score and radiological analysis included postoperative acetabular and femoral component position and hip reconstruction. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was used to estimate the cumulative probability of not having revision surgery for different reasons. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to assess risk factors for revision surgery. Clinical improvement was better in the ON at all intervals. There were 90 hips revised, 68 due to loosening or wear, 52 (2.5%) in group 1, and 16 (4.3%) in group 2. Overall, the survival rate for revision surgery for any cause at 22 years was 88.0 % (95% CI, 82-94) in group 1 and 84.1% (95% CI, 69 – 99) in group 2 (p=0.019). Multivariate regression analysis showed that hips with conventional polyethylene (PE), compared with highly-cross linked PEs or ceramic-on-ceramic bearings, (p=0.01, Hazard Ratio (HR): 2.12, 95% CI 1.15-3.92), and cups outside the Lewinnek´s safe zone had a higher risk for revision surgery (p<0.001, HR: 2.57, 95% CI 1.69-3.91). Modern highly-cross linked PEs and ceramic-on-ceramic bearings use, and a proper surgical technique improved revision rate in patients undergoing THA due to ON compared with OA

Salvage Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) presents a viable solution following failed treatment of a hip fracture. Several studies have suggested higher complication rate including high dislocation rate associated with salvage THA. The present study evaluates the results and complications of hip arthroplasty performed as a salvage procedure after the failed treatment of a hip fracture and comparison made to Primary THA in osteoarthritis (OA). Between 1992 and 2007, 53 patients with a mean age of seventy years were treated with THA after the failed treatment of a hip fracture under the care of a single surgeon. The indication for conversion arthroplasty was Avascular necrosis head – 24(45.3%), screw cut out – 6 (11.3%), non-union – 2(3.8%), Displaced fracture – 2(3.8%), Secondary OA – 19 (35.8%). The implants retrieved were Cannulated screws – 3, Sliding plate and screw – 46, Spline plate – 2, Smith Petersons nail – 1, Martin Plate – 1. This group of patients were matched for age, sex, side, and ASA grading with a group of 59 patients who underwent THA for primary osteoarthritis (THA-OA group). Posterior approach was used in all cases. Four patients (7.5%) required grafting of cup and 21 patients (39.6%) required soft tissue release. The average blood loss was 555 ml, mean duration of surgery was 85.5 min, average inpatient stay was 6.7 days. Cemented THA was used in 43 patients and Cementless THA in 10 patients. At one year follow up there were no dislocations, one patient had an undisplaced femoral fracture treated in Spica. Three patients had broken screws; one patient with shortening > 1 inch. There was one revision for deep infection. The mean Harris Hip Score (HHS) improved from 28.4 to 82.5 at one year, while the Oxford Hip score (OHS) improved from 50.9 to 21.9 (Old system). When the scores were compared to the THA-OA group there was no difference in the oxford hip scores and the the mean one year HHS in the THA-OA group was slightly higher than the group with salvage THA, but the difference was not statistically significant. Hip arthroplasty is an effective salvage procedure in patients with prior surgery for hip fracture. Most patients have good pain relief and functional improvement. Despite the operative challenges, remarkably few serious orthopaedic complications were associated with this procedure in the present study

Corrosion and wear of total hip (THA) and knee (TKA) prostheses extricate metallic particles and soluble metallic compounds. The oncogenic risk of these products should be known. Material and methods: Three Nordic cohorts of total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients operated on for primary osteoarthrosis during 1967–1995 were combined for meta-analysis. The number of THA patients was 49,000 and TKA patients 24,000 totaling 497,000 person years. The mean follow-up time was 6.8 years. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) with 95% conþdence intervals (95% CI) were calculated for the observed and expected number of cancers. The expected numbers were based on national incidence rates. Results: The allover SIRs as well as the site-speciþc cancer incidences were similar for the THA and TKA patients. The observed number of all site cancers was 7639 and 8202 expected (SIR 0.93, 95% CI 0.91–0.95). The SIR for lung cancer (0.69, 0.64–0.75) was reduced. The incidence was also low for cancers of the stomach (SIR 0.76, 0.67–0.84), colon (SIR 0.86, 0.79–0.93) and rectum (SIR 0.89, 0.80–0.98). Slightly elevated SIRs were seen among TKA patients in cancer of the endometrium and prostate and among both THA and TKA patients in skin melanoma. Conclusions: Total cancer risk was signiþcantly reduced among THA and TKA patients due to decrease of respiratory and gastrointestinal cancers. The present results do not suggest any oncogenic risk of the components of hip and knee prostheses and their degradation products

Objective: To investigate the clinical outcome of debridement arthroplasty using medial approach for the osteoarthritis of the elbows.

Methods: 40 elbows in 36 patients with osteoarthritis of the elbow were reviewed retrospectively. All of the patients were men and the mean age at the time of surgery was 60.0 years. The mean duration of follow-up was 35 months. All elbows were managed operatively with debridement arthroplasty. This procedure consisted of removal of free bodies, resection of inflammatory synovia, and resection of osteophytes. Medial approach with medial epicondylectomy was applied for all cases. In 10 elbows, posterior approach was used additionally for the debridement of posterior compartment.

Results: 23 elbows (57.5 %) had an excellent result, 11 elbows (27.5 %) had a good result, and six (15 %) had a fair result. 10 elbows (25%) had complete relief of pain while the other 30 elbows (75 %) had partial relief. Remaining pain was mostly located at the lateral aspect in patients with severe radiohumral arthritis. Flexion was improved from 106.5 degrees to 121.5 degrees.

Conclusion: This procedure is effective for patients with osteoarthritis of the elbow which is localized in ulnohumeral joint. Total elbow arthroplasty must be considered for the severe radiohumeral arthritis. Careful selection of patients is essential for successful outcome.

From 1996, we were added fenestration between coronoid fossa, and olecranon fossa at the time of debridement arthroplasty termed extensive debridement arthroplasty with medial and lateral approach.The purpose of this study is to investigate clinical results of extensive debridement arthroplasty.

17 cases could be followed more than two years. Their averaged age was 57.3 years old. Two elbows had a previous history of debridement arthroplasty. In preoperative averaged flexion angle was 105 and averaged extension was 28C Clinical evaluation was performed with the elbow score of Japanese Orthopedic Association Preoperative averaged JOA score was 54.6 points In ray study we investigated whether the fenestration was open or closed.

In all cases, their symptoms improved D All patients returned to their former occupations satisfied with the clinical results Infection postoperative fracture and ectopic ossification were not observed.The averaged JOA score was 91 points Postoperative averaged flexion was 127 averaged extention was 12_Improvement of extension was 16 and that of flexion was 22 Closure of the fenestration was observed in five elbows Osteophyte formations of the coronoid process and olecranon was seen in 4 elbows

The JOA score of pain and ROM of these results were superior compared with any reports of debridement arthroplasty.The JOA score and results of ROM were superior when the fenestration was open.To maintain the fenestration hole open some modification will be necessary

Short term results of extensive debridement arthroplasty showed satisfactory results in terms of pain relief and Improvement of ROM, especially in extension.

Introduction: THR and TKR have been shown to be successful treatments for moderate to severe osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. The requirement for total joint replacement will increase as the population ages. This study reports on the incidence of THR and TKR in an Australian population.

Method: Age and gender specific numbers of THR and TKR for the Australian population, 1994–1998 were obtained from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. The same data for South Australia, 1988–1998 were obtained from the Department of Human Services Epidemiology Branch. The incidences were calculated and tested for changes over time.

Results: For the Australian population in 1994 there were 9,120 THR and by 1998 this had increased by 25.9% to 11,488 THR. There were 10,132 TKR in 1994 and by 1998 this had increased by 42.8% to 14,472 TKR. Stratified by age group changes in incidence rate with respect to time was statistically tested using regression analysis. For the eleven year data from South Australia there was a significant increase in the overall incidence of THR (p=0.012). There were significant increases in TKR incidence, although this increase was not uniform across all age groups (p< 0.001). The increase in TKR incidence was greater than that for THR. For both THR and TKR there were no significant differences on the basis of gender.

Conclusion: The incidence of THR is increasing in Australia and TKR incidence is increasing at a greater rate. Future projections must take into account these changing incidences as well as changes in population demographics.

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to analyse regional differences in the microstructural and mechanical properties of the distal femur depending on osteoarthritic changes using micro-images based on finite element analysis.

Total joint replacement (TJR) is by far the most effective therapy for end-stage OA patients. Most of patients achieve joint pain reduction and function improvement following to TJR, however up to 22% of them either do not improve or deteriorate after surgery. The aim of this study was to identify genetic variants to be associated with poor outcome of TJR in primary OA patients by a genome-wide association approach (GWAS).

Study participants were primary OA patients from the Newfoundland Osteoarthritis Study (NFOAS) that comprised total knee or hip replacement and recruited before 2016 in St. John's, NL. DNA samples were extracted from patients' blood. Study participants completed their pre-operation and 3.99±1.38 years post-surgery outcome assessment using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). DNA samples were genotyped using the genome-wide Illumina HumanOmni2.58 genotyping microarray containing 2.4 million SNPs. Pre-association quality control filtering was conducted for the raw genotyping data using PLINK 1.7 program, and genotype imputation was performed using the IMPUTE2 algorithm with multiple population reference data from 1000 Genome Project. The imputed data with ∼3.1 million variants was used to test the association with non-responders to TJR using the additive genetic model.

Eighty three primary OA patients (44 responders and 39 non-responders) were included in the analysis. Association analysis detected three chromosomal regions on chr5, 7, and 8 to be significantly associated with non-responding to pain. The top SNPs at these loci are intergenic variants that include SNP (rs17118094, p=4.4×10-5) on chr5. This SNP is adjacent to SGCD gene that plays an important role in muscular strength and maintenance. Another associated SNP (rs71572810, p=4.7×10-5) is nearby IMMP2L gene on chr7. This gene is reported to be associated with behavioral abnormalities. Finally, SNP (rs6992938, p=5.8×10-5) on chr8 is located downstream of TRPA1 gene that is known to have a central role in the pain response to endogenous inflammatory mediators. Three loci were also found to be significantly associated with non-responding to function. The lead variant in the locus on chr1 is an intergenic SNP (rs9729377, p=1.7×10-5) falling between CTBS and MCOLN2 genes. CTBS gene is associated with TNF-α, a cytokine that stimulate the inflammation acute phase reaction, and MCOLN2 gene plays a role in the chemokine secretion and macrophage migration in the innate immune response. Other top SNPs in loci on chr2 and 10 harbor CCDC93, INSIG2, and KLF6 genes that are associated with heel bone mineral density, hypercholesterolemia, obesity and BMI.

To our knowledge, this project is the first study that investigated the association between genetic factors and TJR non-responders. Our results demonstrated that genes related to muscle strength, behavioral trait, pain response, and inflammation play a significant role in poor outcome of TJR, warranting further investigation.

Purpose: Elbow osteoarthritis (OA) is characterized by a loss of elbow motion secondary to joint capsular hypertrophy and osteophyte formation. Previous work on joint capsules in post-traumatic (PT) elbow joint contractures has shown that alterations in cell populations (increased number of alpha-SMA positive myofibroblasts), matrix molecule and enzyme, and growth factor mRNA profiles are associated with loss of elbow motion in this condition. The objective of this study was to determine whether alterations in joint capsule parameters were similar or different in two etiologies of human elbow contractures, primary OA and PT.

Method: Posterior elbow joint capsules were obtained from eight male patients with primary elbow OA (age 52±12 yr ), five male patients with chronic (> 1 year) PT (age 47±12 yr ) and four male organ donors free of OA and contractures (age 43±10 yr ). RNA was extracted for subsequent real-time PCR for alpha-SMA, interleu-kin-1beta, MMP-1, MMP-3, collagen type III, biglycan, versican, tenascin C, TIMP-1, MMP-2, iNOS, COX-2, glyceraldehyde – 3 phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and 18S. 18S was used to normalize gene expression. Statistical comparisons used a oneway ANOVA followed by posthoc Tukey test. Significance was p < 0.05.

Results: The mRNA levels in the OA and PT capsules were increased compared to controls in most cases. This includes the major matrix molecule collagen I and the myofibroblast marker alpha-SMA, the growth factors TGF-beta1 and CTGF plus decorin, the injury response elements (collagen III, biglycan, versican, tenascin C) as well as TIMP-1 and MMP-2. The housekeeping gene GAPDH was similar in all 3 groups as was COX-2, while iNOS was elevated in both groups characterized by contractures. When comparing the two contracture groups, the mRNA levels were similar for some molecules while differences were evident in other instances. In PT, alpha-SMA and collagen I were greater than in OA. Conversely, in the OA group, the growth factors and matrix enzyme systems exhibited higher levels than PT.

Conclusion: In this study of human elbow joint capsules, we have shown that relative mRNA levels for markers of myofibroblasts, major matrix components, injury response elements and selected growth factors are significantly elevated in elbow OA and post-traumatic contractures when compared to age matched organ donor controls free of contractures. When comparing the OA and PT groups, the injury response molecules were elevated to similar relative levels. The OA group had greater increases in the growth factors and many of the matrix enzymes / inhibitors measured, while the PT group had greater increases in the myofibroblast marker alpha-SMA and the major matrix molecule collagen I. Thus in general matrix, growth factor and cellular properties appear to be preferentially altered in the two conditions studied when compared to control tissues, strengthened by the fact that the housekeeping gene GAPDH had similar relative levels in all 3 groups.

Objectives: The major objective of the present study was to investigate the risk of revision of infection after primary total knee replacements (TKR) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) during a 13-year period. We wished to compare RA patients with OA patients in order to detect differences in the risk of revision for infection, and to compare changes in the risk for the two patient groups over time. Furthermore we studied the time from primary implantation to revision for infection in the two groups.

Patients and Methods: From January 1994 to June 2008, 2482 primary TKRs in patients with RA and 25189 in OA patients were identified in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Kaplan-Meier survival curves, with revision for infection as the endpoint, were constructed. Cox regression analyses were performed to calculate relative risk (RR) of revision for infection according to diagnosis, age, gender, year of surgery (from 1994 through 2000 and from 2001 to June 2008) and time of revision related to the time of primary TKR. All relative risks were adjusted for the other variables.

Results: The 5-year revision rate for infection of TKR was 1.1% in RA patients and 0.5% in OA patients. Rheumatoid arthritis patients had a 1.7 (95%CI 1.2–2.6) times higher risk of revision for infection compared to the control group (OA patients). The patients who had TKR surgery in the later period had a decreased risk of revision for infection (RR 0.72, 95%CI 0.53–0.98) compared to the time period 1994–2000. Furthermore, the risk of revision for late infection in RA patients, increased compared to OA from 4 years after the index operation.

Conclusion: Patients with RA undergoing total knee replacement surgery were at a higher risk of revision for prosthetic joint infection and had a higher risk of late infections leading to revision, than patients with OA. These findings emphasizes the importance of preoperative management and optimizing preventive strategies, especially in this patient group.

From June 1983 up to the end of 2000, we performed Chiari’s osteotomy at 61 dysplastic hips in 54 women from 18 – 53 years (M.A. 35 years). In 47 cases, the osteotomy was performed at left and in 14 at right hip. In all cases the angle CE was measured preoperatively and after the operation.

The angle was measured from −20° up to +18° (Mean 13°), preoperatively. The increase of the CE angle means better covering of femoral head, improvement of hip function for the many years and creation of good anatomic conditions in acetabulum for hip replacement in the future.

Aims. Despite higher rates of revision after total hip arthroplasty (THA) being reported for uncemented stems in patients aged > 75 years, they are frequently used in this age group. Increased mortality after cemented fixation is often used as a justification, but recent data do not confirm this association. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of the design of the stem and the type of fixation on the rate of revision and immediate postoperative mortality, focusing on the age and sex of the patients. Methods. A total of 333,144 patients with primary osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip who underwent elective THA between November 2012 and September 2022, using uncemented acetabular components without reconstruction shells, from the German arthroplasty registry were included in the study. The revision rates three years postoperatively for four types of stem (uncemented, uncemented with collar, uncemented short, and cemented) were compared within four age groups: < 60 years (Young), between 61 and 70 years (Mid-I), between 71 and 80 years (Mid-II), and aged > 80 years (Old). A noninferiority analysis was performed on the most frequently used designs of stem. Results. The design of the stem was found to have no significant influence on the rate of revision for either sex in the Young group. Uncemented collared stems had a significantly lower rate of revision compared with the other types of stem for females in the Mid-I group. There was a significantly higher rate of revision for uncemented stems in females in the Mid-II group compared with all other types of stem, while in males the rate for uncemented stems was only significantly higher than the rate for cemented stems. Cemented stems had a significantly lower revision rate compared with uncemented and short stems for both sexes in the Old cohort, as did females with collared stems. The rate of immediate postoperative mortality was similar for all types of stem in the Old age group, as were the American Society of Anesthesiologists grades. Conclusion. In patients aged > 80 years, uncemented and short stems had significantly higher revision rates compared with cemented and collared stems, especially in females. The design of the stem and type of fixation have to be analyzed in more detail than only considering cemented and uncemented fixation, in order to further improve the success of THA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(3 Supple A):130–136

Cementless surface replacement arthroplasty (CSRA) is an established treatment for glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Few studies however, evaluate its role in cuff tear arthopathy. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of CSRA for both glenohumeral osteoarthritis and cuff tear arthopathy.

42 CSRA with the Mark IV Copeland prosthesis were performed for glenohumeral osteoarthritis (n=21) or cuff tear arthopathy (n=21). Patients were assessed with Oxford and Constant scores, patient satisfaction, range of motion and radiologically with plain radiographs.

Mean follow-up and age was 5.2 years and 74 years in both groups. Functional outcomes were significantly higher in OA compared with CTA with OSS improving from 18 to 37.5 and 15 to 26 in both groups respectively. Forward flexion improved from 60° to 126° and 42° to 74° in both groups. Three patients in the CTA group had a deficient subscapularis tendon, two of whom dislocated anteriorly.

Humeral head resurfacing arthroplasty is a viable treatment option for glenohumeral osteoarthritis. In patients with CTA, functional gains are limited. We suggest CSRA should be considered in low demand patients where pain is the primary problem. Caution should be taken in patients with a deficient subscapularis due to the high risk of dislocation.

Aims. The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival of a collarless, straight, hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty (THA) at a minimum follow-up of 20 years. Methods. We reviewed the results of 165 THAs using the Omnifit HA system in 138 patients, performed between August 1993 and December 1999. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 46 years (20 to 77). Avascular necrosis was the most common indication for THA, followed by ankylosing spondylitis and primary osteoarthritis. The mean follow-up was 22 years (20 to 31). At 20 and 25 years, 113 THAs in 91 patients and 63 THAs in 55 patients were available for review, respectively, while others died or were lost to follow-up. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to evaluate the survival of the stem. Radiographs were reviewed regularly, and the stability of the stem was evaluated using the Engh classification. Results. A total of seven stems (4.2%) were revised during the study period: one for aseptic loosening, three for periprosthetic fracture, two for infection, and one for recurrent dislocation. At 20 years, survival with revision of the stem for any indication and for aseptic loosening as the endpoint was 96.0% (95% confidence interval (CI) 92.6 to 99.5) and 98.4% (95% CI 96.2 to 100), respectively. At 25 years, the corresponding rates of survival were 94.5% (95% CI 89.9 to 99.3) and 98.1% (95% CI 95.7 to 99.6), respectively. There was radiological evidence of stable bony fixation in 86 stems (76.1%) and evidence of loosening in four (3.5%) at 20 years. All patients with radiological evidence of loosening were asymptomatic. Conclusion. The Omnifit HA femoral stem offered promising long-term survival into the third decade. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(3 Supple A):110–114

Aims. The aim of this study was to determine whether total hip arthroplasty (THA) for chronic hip pain due to unilateral primary osteoarthritis (OA) has a beneficial effect on cognitive performance. Methods. A prospective cohort study was conducted with 101 patients with end-stage hip OA scheduled for THA (mean age 67.4 years (SD 9.5), 51.5% female (n = 52)). Patients were assessed at baseline as well as after three and months. Primary outcome was cognitive performance measured by d2 Test of Attention at six months, Trail Making Test (TMT), FAS-test, Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test (RBMT; story recall subtest), and Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (ROCF). The improvement of cognitive performance was analyzed using repeated measures analysis of variance. Results. At six months, there was significant improvement in attention, working speed and concentration (d2-test; p < 0.001), visual construction and visual memory (ROCF; p < 0.001), semantic memory (FAS-test; p = 0.009), verbal episodic memory (RBMT; immediate recall p = 0.023, delayed recall p = 0.026), as well as pain (p < 0.001) with small to large effect sizes. Attention, concentration, and visual as well as verbal episodic memory improved significantly with medium effect sizes over η. 2. partial. = 0.06. In these cognitive domains the within-group difference exceeded the minimum clinically important difference. Conclusion. THA is associated with clinically relevant postoperative improvement in the cognitive functions of attention, concentration, and memory. These data support the concept of a broad interaction of arthroplasty with central nervous system function. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(3):331–340

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is performed under general anesthesia (GA) or spinal anesthesia (SA). The first objective of this study was to determine which patient factors are associated with receiving SA versus GA. The second objective was to discern the effect of anesthesia type on short-term postoperative complications and readmission. The third objective was to elucidate factors that impact the effect of anesthesia type on outcome following arthroplasty. This retrospective cohort study included 108,905 patients (median age, 66 years; IQR 60-73 years; 56.0% females) who underwent primary THA for treatment of primary osteoarthritis in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database during the period of 2013-2018. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate variables associated with anesthesia type and outcomes following arthroplasty. Anesthesia type administered during THA was significantly associated with race. Specifically, Black and Hispanic patients were less likely to receive SA compared to White patients (White: OR 1.00; Black: OR 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71-0.75; Hispanic: OR 0.81; CI, 0.75-0.88), while Asian patients were more likely to receive SA (OR 1.44, CI 1.31-1.59). Spinal anesthesia was associated with increased age (OR 1.01; CI 1.00-1.01). Patients with less frailty and lower comorbidity were more likely to receive SA based on the modified frailty index ([mFI-5]=0: OR 1.00; mFI-5=1: OR 0.90, CI 0.88-0.93; mFI-5=2 or greater: OR 0.86, CI 0.83-0.90) and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class (ASA=1: OR 1.00; ASA=2: OR 0.85, CI 0.79-0.91; ASA=3: OR 0.64, CI 0.59-0.69; ASA=4-5: OR 0.47; CI 0.41-0.53). With increased BMI, patients were less likely to be treated with SA (OR 0.99; CI 0.98-0.99). Patients treated with SA had less post-operative complications than GA (OR 0.74; CI 0.67-0.81) and a lower risk of readmission than GA (OR 0.88; CI 0.82-0.95) following THA. Race, age, BMI, and ASA class were found to affect the impact of anesthesia type on post-operative complications. Stratified analysis demonstrated that the reduced risk of complications following arthroplasty noted in patients treated with SA compared to GA was more pronounced in Black, Asian, and Hispanic patients compared to White patients. Furthermore, the positive effect of SA compared to GA was stronger in patients who had reduced age, elevated BMI, and lower ASA class. Among patients undergoing THA for management of primary osteoarthritis, factors including race, BMI, and frailty appear to have impacted the type of anesthesia received. Patients treated with SA had a significantly lower risk of readmission to hospital and adverse events within 30 days of surgery compared to those treated with GA. Furthermore, the positive effect on outcome afforded by SA was different between patients depending on race, age, BMI, and ASA class. These findings may help to guide selection of anesthesia type in subpopulations of patients undergoing primary THA

Aims. During total knee replacement (TKR), surgeons can choose whether or not to resurface the patella, with advantages and disadvantages of each approach. Recently, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommended always resurfacing the patella, rather than never doing so. NICE found insufficient evidence on selective resurfacing (surgeon’s decision based on intraoperative findings and symptoms) to make recommendations. If effective, selective resurfacing could result in optimal individualized patient care. This protocol describes a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of primary TKR with always patellar resurfacing compared to selective patellar resurfacing. Methods. The PAtellar Resurfacing Trial (PART) is a patient- and assessor-blinded multicentre, pragmatic parallel two-arm randomized superiority trial of adults undergoing elective primary TKR for primary osteoarthritis at NHS hospitals in England, with an embedded internal pilot phase (ISRCTN 33276681). Participants will be randomly allocated intraoperatively on a 1:1 basis (stratified by centre and implant type (cruciate-retaining vs cruciate-sacrificing)) to always resurface or selectively resurface the patella, once the surgeon has confirmed sufficient patellar thickness for resurfacing and that constrained implants are not required. The primary analysis will compare the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) one year after surgery. Secondary outcomes include patient-reported outcome measures at three months, six months, and one year (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, OKS, EuroQol five-dimension five-level questionnaire, patient satisfaction, postoperative complications, need for further surgery, resource use, and costs). Cost-effectiveness will be measured for the lifetime of the patient. Overall, 530 patients will be recruited to obtain 90% power to detect a four-point difference in OKS between the groups one year after surgery, assuming up to 40% resurfacing in the selective group. Conclusion. The trial findings will provide evidence about the clinical and cost-effectiveness of always patellar resurfacing compared to selective patellar resurfacing. This will inform future NICE guidelines on primary TKR and the role of selective patellar resurfacing. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(6):464–478