In response to the COVID-19 pandemic public health measures were implemented to limit virus spread. After initial implementation of a province-wide lockdown (Stage 1), there followed a sequential ease of restrictions through Stages 2 and 3 over a 6-month period from March to September 2020 (Table 1). We aimed to determine the impact of COVID-19 public health measures on the epidemiology of operative paediatric orthopaedic trauma and to determine differential effects of each stage of lockdown. A retrospective cohort study was performed comparing all emergency department (ED) visits for musculoskeletal trauma and operatively treated orthopaedic trauma cases at a Level-1 paediatric trauma center during Mar-Sep 2020 (pandemic), compared with Mar-Sep 2019 (pre-pandemic). All operative cases were analyzed based on injury severity, mechanism of injury (MOI) and anatomic location (AL). Comparisons between groups were assessed using chi-square testing for categorical variables, and student t-tests and Fisher's exact tests for continuous variables. During the pandemic period, ED visits for orthopaedic trauma decreased compared to pre-pandemic levels by 23% (1370 vs 1790 patients) and operative treatment decreased by 28% (283 vs 391 patients). There was a significant decrease in the number of operative cases per day in lockdown Stage 1 (1.25 pandemic vs 1.90 pre- pandemic; p < 0 .001) and Stage 2 (1.65 pandemic vs 3.03 pre-pandemic; p< 0.001) but no difference in operative case number during Stage 3 (2.18 pandemic vs 2.45 pre-pandemic; p=0.35). Significant differences were found in MOI and AL during Stage 1 (p < 0 .001) and Stage 2 (p < 0 .001) compared to pre-pandemic. During Stage 1 and 2, playground injuries decreased by 95% and 82%, respectively; sports injuries decreased by 79% and 13%, and trampoline injuries decreased 44% and 43%, compared to pre-pandemic. However, self-propelled transit injuries (bicycles/skateboards) increased during Stage 1 and Stage 2 by 67% and 28%, respectively compared to pre- pandemic. During lockdown Stage 3 there were no differences in MOI nor AL. There were no significant differences in injury severity in any lockdown stage compared to pre-pandemic. COVID-19 lockdown measures significantly reduced the burden of operative paediatric orthopaedic trauma. Differences in volume, mechanism and pattern of injuries varied by lockdown stage offering evidence of the burden of operative trauma related to specific childhood activities. These findings will assist health systems planning for future pandemics and suggest that improvements in safety of playgrounds and self-propelled transit are important in reducing severe childhood injury requiring operative intervention. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Applying the concept of a regional trauma network to the UK paediatric trauma population has unique difficulties in terms of low patient volume and variation in paediatric service provision. In addition, no consensus exists as to which radiological investigations should be employed and an increasing trend towards computerised tomography raises concerns over radiation exposure. We carried out a retrospective review of all paediatric trauma calls from April 2010 and March 2013 around becoming a Major Trauma Centre. We aim to analyse the impact this has on trauma calls and assess the radiological investigations currently used in this population. The number of yearly paediatric trauma calls doubled during our study and totalled 132. The commonest mechanisms of injury were road traffic collisions, fall from a height or fall off a horse. 91.7% of children had some form of radiological investigation; 67% plain radiograph, 37.1% trauma CT, 21.2% focused CT and 5.3% abdominal ultrasound scan. Of the 77 CT scans performed 57.1% were reported as normal and 54.5% of these patients were discharged home the same day. Five children re-attended the emergency department within 30 days with two positive findings; a subdural haematoma and a tibial plateau fracture. The current use of harmful radiological investigations in paediatric trauma patients is not uniform. We propose implementation of radiology protocols and clinical guidance to imaging in paediatric trauma to limited radiation exposure

Introduction. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a rapidly implemented restructuring of UK healthcare services. The The Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, became a central hub for the provision of trauma services for North Central/East London (NCEL) while providing a musculoskeletal tumour service for the south of England, the Midlands, and Wales and an urgent spinal service for London. This study reviews our paediatric practice over this period in order to share our experience and lessons learned. Our hospital admission pathways are described and the safety of surgical and interventional radiological procedures performed under general anaesthesia (GA) with regards to COVID-19 in a paediatric population are evaluated. Methods. All paediatric patients (≤ 16 years) treated in our institution during the six-week peak period of the pandemic were included. Prospective data for all paediatric trauma and urgent elective admissions and retrospective data for all sarcoma admissions were collected. Telephone interviews were conducted with all patients and families to assess COVID-19 related morbidity at 14 days post-discharge. Results. Overall, 100 children underwent surgery or interventional radiological procedures under GA between 20 March and 8 May 2020. There were 35 trauma cases, 20 urgent elective orthopaedic cases, two spinal emergency cases, 25 admissions for interventional radiology procedures, and 18 tumour cases. 78% of trauma cases were performed within 24 hours of referral. In the 97% who responded at two weeks following discharge, there were no cases of symptomatic COVID-19 in any patient or member of their households. Conclusion. Despite the extensive restructuring of services and the widespread concerns over the surgical and anaesthetic management of paediatric patients during this period, we treated 100 asymptomatic patients across different orthopaedic subspecialties without apparent COVID-19 or unexpected respiratory complications in the early postoperative period. The data provides assurance for health care professionals and families and informs the consenting process. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-6:287–292

At-home softcast removal with no routine clinical follow-up has shown to be safe and effective following paediatric orthopaedic trauma. It minimises clinician contact time and reduces cost. However, there is limited data on the caregiver experience. Retrospective analysis of paediatric fractures requiring application of circumferential softcast that was later removed at home. Two time points were included: (1)July–September 2022, (2)February–April 2023. Demographics data included age, fracture classification, angulation, manipulation requirement, complications or unplanned re-attendance. Caregivers were given an information leaflet on cast removal. Caregivers completed a telephone Likert questionnaire reviewing time taken to remove cast, qualitative descriptors of cast removal and overall satisfaction. 77 families were contacted at mean 93 days post injury. Mean age was 7.5 years. 41(53%) were distal radius and 20(26%) both-bone forearm fractures. The remaining were hand, elbow or tibia injuries. 40(52%) injuries required manipulation under procedural sedation with mean sagittal angulation 24 degrees. 13(17%) patients re-attended with cast problems. Caregivers estimated a mean 13 minutes to remove cast. 83% found it ‘extremely’ or ‘somewhat’ easy. 75% were ‘extremely’ or ‘somewhat’ satisfied. 71% were ‘extremely’ or ‘somewhat’ likely to recommend at-home cast removal. Qualitative descriptors ranged from from ‘traumatising’ to ‘fun’ and ‘straightforward’. The experience at our tertiary centre confirms at-home softcast removal with no further orthopaedic follow-up is safe and feasible, even in those requiring manipulation under sedation. The majority of families reported a positive experience; this however is not universal. Adequate patient information resources are integral to a positive caregiver's experiences

Purpose. A review of the role of external fixators in paediatric trauma at The Royal London Hospital Trauma and Orthopaedic Department. Methods. Retrospective study between 2004 and 2010 reviewing traumatic bone injuries that required initial management with an external fixator. Information was collected through the patients' medical documents and radiographs. Results. In total twenty-seven patients (15 male:12 female, mean age 11, age range 7-15) were initially treated with external fixators over the six year period. The injured bones included 18 tibias, 5 femurs, 2 humeri, 2 radius/ulna, 2 phalanges and 1 wrist. Three patients had two fractures requiring external fixators. Four patients had associated head injuries. Indications included twenty –one open fractures (3 Gustilo type 2, 6 Gustilo type 3A, 12 Gustilo type 3B), seven closed fractures in poly-trauma patients and two closed severely comminuted fractures. Ten fractures were treated with the external fixator as the definitive treatment, fourteen had application of cast following removal of the external fixator and six were converted to internal fixation. Twenty-eight Linear frames were applied (23 Hoffman IIs, 5 Compact Hoffmans) and two circular frames. Mean duration of frame stabilisation was 8 weeks (range 1-16 weeks). Complications included 2 pin site infections successfully treated with antibiotics, 2 patients with hypertrophic scars, 2 leg length discrepancies secondary to bone loss, 2 patients had delayed union and 2 patients had a lower limb deformity requiring intervention, one for adjustment of frame and the other for correction osteotomy with circular frame. Conclusion. The use of external fixators has an important role to play in the management of open fractures and poly-trauma paediatric patients

Purpose:. Non-contiguous spinal injury can add significant complexity to the diagnosis, management and outcome in children. There is very little in the paediatric literature examining the nature, associated risk factors, management and outcomes of non-contiguous spinal injuries. The objective is to determine the incidence and clinical characteristics of non-contiguous spinal injuries in a paediatric population. The secondary objective is to identify high risk patients requiring further imaging to rule out non-contiguous spinal injuries. Methods:. All children up to 18 years of age with a spinal injury, as defined by ICD-09 codes at one paediatric trauma hospital were included (n=211). Data for patient demographics, mechanism of injury, spinal levels involved, extent of neurologic injury and recovery, associated injuries, medical complications, treatment and outcome were recorded. Results:. Twenty five (11.8%) out of 211 patients had non-contiguous spinal injuries. The mean age was 10.7 years. The most common pattern of injury was a double thoracic non-contiguous injury. 16% of cases of NCSI were initially missed, but with no clinical deterioration due to the missed diagnosis. Associated injuries occurred in 52% of patients with NCSI. Twenty-four percent of patients with multiple non-contiguous spinal injuries had a neurologic injury compared to 9.7% in patients with single level or contiguous injuries (p=0.046). Conclusions:. There is a high incidence of children with multiple non-contiguous spinal injuries who are more likely to suffer neurological injuries compared to patients with single level or contiguous spinal injuries. Patients with a single level spinal injury on existing imaging and a neurological injury should have entire spine lateral radiographs to exclude non-contiguous injuries. In patients without neurologic injury and a single spinal fracture, radiographs showing at least 7 levels above and below the fracture should be performed. All children with spinal injury should have associated injuries carefully excluded

Purpose

To examine the management and outcome of patients suffering complex paediatric lower limb injuries with bone and soft tissue loss.

Aim: Controversy remains regarding the complications/necessity for removal of metalwork used in the fixation of paediatric orthopaedic surgery owing to potential complications of removal. It was the aim of this study to review all cases of metalwork removal performed in a prescribed year in order to ascertain the reasons for removal and complications of these surgeries.

Methods: All cases of metalwork removal performed under GA, from 1st January 2006 until 31st December 2006 in a regional paediatric orthopaedic unit, were reviewed. Data were obtained from case notes, computer and theatre records and radiographs. Details were obtained regarding demographic details, anatomic site, implant used, reasons for removal, problems of initial fixation and complications after removal.

Results: 34 buried kirschner wires were removed under general anaesthetic. Of other metal work, 38 implants were removed; 22 in males and 16 in females. The commonest age distribution was the 11–15 age groups. The most common anatomic site for removal was the forearm (42%) followed by the femur (18%) and ankle (18%). The most common implant removed was plate (53%), followed by Nancy nails (18%). Problems following initial insertion were found in 4 patients (10.5%) including re-fracture distal to forearm plates (both in patients with co-existing osteopaenia), bowing of forearm and decreased sensation over the thumb. Metal work was removed for symptoms in 13 cases (34%) and the rest for patient request or clinical indications. Complications after metalwork removal occurred in 8 (21%) patients and included re-fracture of forearm (2), hypertrophic scar, abscess, skin reaction, wound breakdown, excessive bruising and discomfort.

Conclusion: As routine removal of metalwork is generally considered not necessary, metalwork removal is often carried out for symptoms, at patient request as well as in patients with osteopaenia who have risk of fracture at the ends of metalwork. Parents need to be made aware of possible complications shown in the study, in order to give informed consent.

Introduction: Children are inevitably casualties in wars. They are treated variously by local doctors and foreign surgeons working for military and Non-Governmental Organisations. The basic principles of surgical treatment of war wounds are the same as for adults, but there are specific differences in injury pattern and the response to injury that must be borne in mind. Method: Casualties under sixteen years age with extremity trauma caused by missiles or blast admitted to a British military field hospital during the latest Gulf War were evaluated. The date, time and method of wounding were recorded and ICRC Wound Scores calculated. The details of surgical treatment prior to admission, and further surgical management described. Case studies were used to illustrate particular considerations relevant to paediatric trauma. Results: The records for sixteen wounded children were available for analysis. Their ages ranged from three to fifteen years. The method of injury falls into three phases, gun-shot wounds during the mobile attack, shell fragment wounds during the seige of urban areas and blast/fragment injuries from small munitions from the period following active fighting. Blast/fragment wounds typically affected multiple body areas. Half the patients had received surgical treatment before reaching the hospital, either at civilian hospitals, forward military surgical units or both. None of this surgery was strictly “life or limb-saving”. Amputations performed prior to admission were in the proximal tibia and followed the long posterior flap pattern appropriate to an adult amputation for vascular disease regardless of the level of injury. Several had primary closure of war wounds. After admission, four patients required plastic surgical procedures, two had ophthalmic surgery, one had a laparotomy and one had a facial reconstruction procedure in addition to surgery for extremity trauma. One child with fragment wounds was undergoing treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Conclusion: A military hospital must be prepared to treat children during war-time. Multi-system injury patterns are common and require multidisciplinary care. When possible children should be transferred to a facility with specialist care available for primary surgery. The effects of injury and treatment on future growth should be given more consideration

Aims: There are no large published studies examining the complication rates associated with use of Kirschner wires in þxation of a wide variety of paediatric fractures. The aim of this study is to analyse the outcomes of fracture þxation using K-wire in upper limb fractures in children and to critically assess the incidence and type of complications. Methods: This study is a retrospective review of a consecutive series of 107 fractures in 105 paediatric trauma cases treated with K-wire in between 01.09.99 to 10.09.01. Results: The fractures were fractures around Wrist (47%) and around elbow (45%). 66 (61.68%) were performed by closed percutaneous technique, 27 (25.23%) by open method and in 14 (13.08%) combined approach was used. Around there were 13 cases with over-granulation at wound site, 6 cases of Soft tissue infection, 2 cases with tendinitis, 1 case of Osteo-myelitis and 1 case with hyper-sensitive scar. 3 cases found to have postoperative neurapraxia and 1 case with axonotmesis. Metal migration was detected in 4 cases and 14 cases found to have shown wire loosening. 10 fractures have lost position in postoperative period out of which 2 cases were reoperated for Re K-wire, 1 had undergone Re-MUA and 7 left for remodelling. Conclusions: K-wires are versatile but are not inherently benign. We conclude that best results could be achieved if total life of K-wire can be restricted to 3–4 weeks. We recommend one should explain all these risks and complications during consenting for K-wiring procedures

Purpose of Study. We report the outcome of five cases of chronic paediatric Monteggia lesion treated with a modified Bell-Tawse procedure. Methods. Five patients with a chronic Monteggia lesion were treated over an eight-year period (2004–2012) at our institution. All underwent a modified Bell-Tawse procedure. The patient medical records were retrospectively analysed. We report the outcome in five patients. Results. Four girls and one boy were treated for a chronic Monteggia lesion in the period studied. The mean age at time of surgery was 8 years old (range 4–14 years). The mechanism of injury was post-traumatic in four of the five cases, while in one case the mechanism was uncertain. All children underwent modified Bell-Tawse procedure. All children ultimately required ulnar osteotomy, while two also required radial osteotomy. At a mean follow-up of 22 months (range 16–38 months), four children had experienced complications. Symptomatic metalwork was removed in one case, two children re-dislocated the affected joint, and one child required revision Bell-Tawse procedure. No nerve palsies were noted on follow-up. Conclusion. Paediatric elbow trauma necessitates early, senior management. We report a series of five patients who underwent modified Bell-Tawse procedure for chronic Monteggia lesion. Four of the five children experienced complications. All required shortening osteotomies. The chronic Monteggia lesion is an unusual but troublesome presentation in the paediatric population. Further research in the area is necessary

This single centre study was a prospective analysis from 2000 to 2008, aiming to explore and characterise the incidence and management of orthopaedic injuries sustained from motorcycle-related accidents in children under 16 years of age in Far North Queensland. In addition, it aimed to recognise factors contributing to crash occurrence, injury pattern and severity.

Prospective survey data has been collected for the past eight years looking at various aspects of non-fatal motorcycle injuries in children up to the age of 16 years who present to Cairns Base Hospital. The study incorporated a simple 12-point questionnaire that was completed upon the child's first presentation to the hospital in either an in- or out-patient clinical setting. The aspects addressed by the survey included: number of accidents, use of safety gear, experience level, injury and management, and cause of the accident. Little research has been conducted on characterising the nature and occurrence of off-road motorcycle accidents in children and adolescents.

A total of 238 children were admitted to Cairns Base Hospital with injuries related to motorcycle accidents. The results of 210 children who sustained orthopaedic injuries are presented. Motorcycle accidents involving children were responsible for over 340 presentations to the Emergency department and for a total of more than 500 hospital bed-days upon admission.

The majority of accidents occurred off-road with over 40% on public property. An average of 11% of riders was female.

This study gives evidence that off-road motorcycle accidents in children are the result of inexperience, utilise a significant proportion of our orthopaedic resources, and that programs and policies directed at reducing the number of injuries from off-road motorcycle riding need implementation.

Background:

The outcomes of open tibial fractures in a paediatric population are reported.

Aims. This observational study examines the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic upon the paediatric trauma burden of a district general hospital. We aim to compare the nature and volume of the paediatric trauma during the first 2020 UK lockdown period with the same period in 2019. Methods. Prospective data was collected from 23 March 2020 to 14 June 2020 and compared with retrospective data collected from 23 March 2019 to 14 June 2019. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, nature of the injury, and details of any surgery were tabulated and statistically analyzed using the independent-samples t-test for normally distributed data and the Mann-Whitney-U test for non-parametric data. Additionally, patients were contacted by telephone to further explore the mechanism of injury where required, to gain some qualitative insight into the risk factors for injury. Results. The 2020 lockdown resulted in 30% fewer paediatric trauma presentations (441 vs 306), but no significant change in the number of patients requiring surgery (47 vs 51; p = 0.686). Trampolining injuries increased in absolute numbers by 168% (p < 0.001), almost four times more common when considered as percentage of all injuries observed in 2020 vs 2019. There was a decrease in high energy trauma from road traffic accidents and falls from height (21.5% decrease, p < 0.001). Despite a shift towards more conservative treatment options, trampolining injuries continued to require surgery in similar proportions (19.4 vs 20%; p = 0.708). Qualitative investigation revealed that the most common risk factor for trampolining injury was concurrent usage, especially with an older child. Conclusion. COVID-19 lockdown has resulted in a decrease in paediatric orthopaedic presentations and high energy trauma. However, due to a marked increase in home trampolining injuries, and their unchanged requirement for surgery, there has been no change in the requirement for surgery during the lockdown period. As home exercise becomes more prevalent, a duty of public health falls upon clinicians to advise parents against trampoline usage. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(2):86–92

Aims. To determine the impact of COVID-19 on orthopaediatric admissions and fracture clinics within a regional integrated care system (ICS). Methods. A retrospective review was performed for all paediatric orthopaedic patients admitted across the region during the recent lockdown period (24 March 2020 to 10 May 2020) and the same period in 2019. Age, sex, mechanism, anatomical region, and treatment modality were compared, as were fracture clinic attendances within the receiving regional major trauma centre (MTC) between the two periods. Results. Paediatric trauma admissions across the region fell by 33% (197 vs 132) with a proportional increase to 59% (n = 78) of admissions to the MTC during lockdown compared with 28.4% in 2019 (N = 56). There was a reduction in manipulation under anaesthetic (p = 0.015) and the use of Kirschner wires (K-wires) (p = 0.040) between the two time periods. The median time to surgery remained one day in both (2019 IQR 0 to 2; 2020 IQR 1 to 1). Supracondylar fractures were the most common reason for fracture clinic attendance (17.3%, n = 19) with a proportional increase of 108.4% vs 2019 (2019 n = 20; 2020 n = 19) (p = 0.007). While upper limb injuries and falls from play apparatus, equipment, or height remained the most common indications for admission, there was a reduction in sports injuries (p < 0.001) but an increase in lacerations (p = 0.031). Fracture clinic management changed with 67% (n = 40) of follow-up appointments via telephone and 69% (n = 65) of patients requiring cast immobilization treated with a 3M Soft Cast, enabling self-removal. The safeguarding team saw a 22% reduction in referrals (2019: n = 41, 2020: n = 32). Conclusion. During this viral pandemic, the number of trauma cases decreased with a change in the mechanism of injury, median age of presentation, and an increase in referrals to the regional MTC. Adaptions in standard practice led to fewer MUA, and K-wire procedures being performed, more supracondylar fractures managed through clinic and an increase in the use of removable cast. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-7:424–430

Aims. COVID-19 necessitated abrupt changes in trauma service delivery. We compare the demographics and outcomes of patients treated during lockdown to a matched period from 2019. Findings have important implications for service development. Methods. A split-site service was introduced, with a COVID-19 free site treating the majority of trauma patients. Polytrauma, spinal, and paediatric trauma patients, plus COVID-19 confirmed or suspicious cases, were managed at another site. Prospective data on all trauma patients undergoing surgery at either site between 16 March 2020 and 31 May 2020 was collated and compared with retrospective review of the same period in 2019. Patient demographics, injury, surgical details, length of stay (LOS), COVID-19 status, and outcome were compared. Results. There were 1,004 urgent orthopaedic trauma patients (604 in 2019; 400 in 2020). Significant reductions in time to theatre and LOS stay were observed. COVID-19 positive status was confirmed in 4.5% (n = 18). The COVID-19 mortality rate was 1.8% (n = 7). Day-case surgery comprised 47.8% (n = 191), none testing positive for COVID-19 or developing clinically significant COVID-19 symptoms requiring readmission, at a minimum of 17 days follow-up. Conclusion. The novel split-site service, segregating suspected or confirmed COVID-19 cases, minimized onward transmission and demonstrated improved outcomes regarding time to surgery and LOS, despite altered working patterns and additional constraints. Day-surgery pathways appear safe regarding COVID-19 transmission. Lessons learned require dissemination and should be sustained in preparation for a potential second wave or, the return of a “normal” non-COVID workload. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-9:568–575

Aims. The management of fractures of the medial epicondyle is one of the greatest controversies in paediatric fracture care, with uncertainty concerning the need for surgery. The British Society of Children’s Orthopaedic Surgery prioritized this as their most important research question in paediatric trauma. This is the protocol for a randomized controlled, multicentre, prospective superiority trial of operative fixation versus nonoperative treatment for displaced medial epicondyle fractures: the Surgery or Cast of the EpicoNdyle in Children’s Elbows (SCIENCE) trial. Methods. Children aged seven to 15 years old inclusive, who have sustained a displaced fracture of the medial epicondyle, are eligible to take part. Baseline function using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) upper limb score, pain measured using the Wong Baker FACES pain scale, and quality of life (QoL) assessed with the EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire for younger patients (EQ-5D-Y) will be collected. Each patient will be randomly allocated (1:1, stratified using a minimization algorithm by centre and initial elbow dislocation status (i.e. dislocated or not-dislocated at presentation to the emergency department)) to either a regimen of the operative fixation or non-surgical treatment. Outcomes. At six weeks, and three, six, and 12 months, data on function, pain, sports/music participation, QoL, immobilization, and analgesia will be collected. These will also be repeated annually until the child reaches the age of 16 years. Four weeks after injury, the main outcomes plus data on complications, resource use, and school absence will be collected. The primary outcome is the PROMIS upper limb score at 12 months post-randomization. All data will be obtained through electronic questionnaires completed by the participants and/or parents/guardians. The NHS number of participants will be stored to enable future data linkage to sources of routinely collected data (i.e. Hospital Episode Statistics). Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(1):69–77

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an antifibrinolytic that can prevent clot breakdown. Trauma patients often have coagulopathy which can cause mortality due to bleeding. The purpose of this review is to investigate the efficacy of TXA in reducing mortality in major trauma and secondly to look at patient's outcomes when using TXA in trauma. Searches were performed in PUBMED, EMBASE and other databases for randomised controlled trials (RCT) and observational studies. The author searched for all relevant evidence on the use of TXA in major trauma. Relevant studies were assessed for quality using the Cochrane's Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias. Eight relevant studies were identified from the search, 3 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 5 observational studies were identified. Five of the 8 studies found a significance in mortality with TXA use. Three showed TXA reduced mortality including the high quality level I evidence, CRASH 2 study. Three studies found no significance on mortality. There appears to be no increased risk of VOE with TXA however results from the studies varied. No study reported any adverse events due to TXA use. There does not appear to be any significant benefit of TXA use in TBI but a trend towards lower mortality. There is a role in paediatric trauma despite evidence from only 2 observational studies. There is a high quality RCT to suggest the use of TXA in trauma patients with supporting evidence from observational studies. The outcomes in TBI are unclear. It may be beneficial in paediatric use but there is currently no level 1 evidence in paediatrics to support this. Further prospective studies looking specifically at role in TBI and paediatric trauma are required to support routine use in these specific populations

Introduction and Objective. The most common paediatric orthopaedic injury requiring hospital admission is a femoral fracture. There is debate regarding the optimal surgical technique for fixing femoral diaphyseal fractures in children aged 4 to 12 years. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) have issued relevant guidelines, however, there is limited evidence to support these. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the complication rate following flexible intramedullary nailing (FIN), plate fixation and external fixation (EF) for traumatic femoral diaphyseal fractures in children aged 4 to 12. Materials and Methods. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases for interventional and observational studies. Two independent reviewers screened, assessed quality and extracted data from the identified studies. The primary outcome was the risk of any complication. Secondary outcomes assessed the risk of pre-specified individual complications. Results. Nine randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 19 observational studies (six prospective and 13 retrospective) fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Within the RCTs, five analysed FIN (n=161), two analysed plates (n=51) and five analysed EF (n=168). Within the observational studies, 13 analysed FIN (n=610), seven analysed plates (n=214) and six analysed EF (n=153). The overall risk of complications was lower following plate fixation when compared to FIN fixation (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.73, p=0.001) in the observational studies. The overall risk of complications was higher following EF when compared to FIN fixation in both RCTs (RR 1.94, 95% CI 1.25 to 3.01, p=0.003) and observational studies (RR 1.97, 95% CI 1.50 to 2.58, p<0.001). The overall risk of complications was higher following EF when compared to plate fixation in both RCTs (RR 7.42, 95% CI 1.84 to 29.98, p=0.005) and observational studies (RR 4.39, 95% CI 2.64 to 7.30, p<0.001). Conclusions. Although NICE and the AAOS recommend FIN for femoral diaphyseal fractures in children aged 4 to 12, this study reports a significantly decreased relative risk of complications when these injuries are managed with plates. Our findings provide valuable information to healthcare professionals who are involved in discussing the risk and benefits of different management options with patients and their families. The overall quality of evidence is low, highlighting the need for a rigorous prospective multicentre randomised trial at low risk of bias due to randomisation and outcome measurement to identify if any fixation technique is superior

Aims. The current global pandemic due to COVID-19 is generating significant burden on the health service in the UK. On 23 March 2020, the UK government issued requirements for a national lockdown. The aim of this multicentre study is to gain a greater understanding of the impact lockdown has had on the rates, mechanisms and types of injuries together with their management across a regional trauma service. Methods. Data was collected from an adult major trauma centre, paediatric major trauma centre, district general hospital, and a regional hand trauma unit. Data collection included patient demographics, injury mechanism, injury type and treatment required. Time periods studied corresponded with the two weeks leading up to lockdown in the UK, two weeks during lockdown, and the same two-week period in 2019. Results. There was a 55.7% (12,935 vs 5,733) reduction in total accident and emergency (A&E) attendances with a 53.7% (354 vs 164) reduction in trauma admissions during lockdown compared to 2019. The number of patients with fragility fractures requiring admission remained constant (32 patients in 2019 vs 31 patients during lockdown; p > 0.05). Road traffic collisions (57.1%, n = 8) were the commonest cause of major trauma admissions during lockdown. There was a significant increase in DIY related-hand injuries (26% (n = 13)) lockdown vs 8% (n = 11 in 2019, p = 0.006) during lockdown, which resulted in an increase in nerve injuries (12% (n = 6 in lockdown) vs 2.5% (n = 3 in 2019, p = 0.015) and hand infections (24% (n = 12) in lockdown vs 6.2% (n = 8) in 2019, p = 0.002). Conclusion. The national lockdown has dramatically reduced orthopaedic trauma admissions. The incidence of fragility fractures requiring surgery has not changed. Appropriate provision in theatres should remain in place to ensure these patients can be managed as a surgical priority. DIY-related hand injuries have increased which has led to an increased in nerve injuries requiring intervention