Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a devastating complication that is very difficult to treat. Whilst uncommon, the condition is frequently encountered by extremity surgeons. The author has considerable experience of dealing with CRPS and, with three clinical cases, will describe how the condition is diagnosed and treated. The very real clinical situation of timing for surgery in patients who have suffered from CRPS is also to be discussed.

Tissue engineering is a rapidly expanding field of research. Bone and cartilage engineering are being undertaken in an attempt to treat osteoarthritis and repair bone defects. In spite of extensive research little successful clinical application of this work has been seen. There are however many advances in the field that one day may have therapeutic interest. One particular area of interest is the potential for using osteophyte tissue in repairing osteoarthritic defects. Osteophytes represent an attempt by the body to regenerate bone and cartilage. They present an obvious source of cells for tissue engineering. Research ay QUT has shown that cells within the osteophytes are a better source of bone and cartilage regeneration in the laboratory than matched patient’s bone marrow stem cells.

Osteoarthritis remains the ultimate challenge for orthopaedic tissue engineering. Understanding the chemical and mechanical signals occurring in osteoarthritis presents opportunities for targeted drug delivery and potential slowing of disease. We have identified changes within the MMP profile of cells at the osteochondral junction. Subchondral sclerosis appears to be associated with changes in the nature of chondrocytes deep within the cartilage layer. This transformation of chondrocytes into osteoblast-like tissue in many ways mimics the changes seen in the growth plate once maturity is reached. Understanding the parallels between these processes may help answer some of the mechanisms of the development of osteoarthritis.

This talk will discuss the above topics as well as other areas of interest to an orthopaedic surgeon working within a group of 10 cell biologists.

Multiple myeloma may be associated with extensive bone destruction, impending or present pathological fracture, and intractable pain. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy are usually effective, but surgical intervention may sometimes be required.

We analyzed the surgical technique and the functional and oncological outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma who underwent surgery in our services between 1993-2004.

There were 19 males and 15 females (age range 49– 75 years) who had destructive bone lesions located at the humerus (n=17), acetabulum (n=5), femur (n=5), or tibia (n=7). Indications for surgery included pathological fracture (n=20), impending pathological fracture (n=11), and intractable pain (n=3). Nineteen patients underwent marginal tumor resection, reconstruction with cemented hardware, and adjuvant radiation therapy and 15 patients underwent wide tumor resection with endoprosthetic reconstruction. All patients reported immediate and substantial postoperative pain relief. Function was good/excellent in 23 patients (68%), moderate in eight (23%), and poor in three (9%). Two patients (5.9%) had local tumor recurrence treated with local excision and adjuvant radiotherapy, with no evidence of further recurrence at 21 and 26 months, respectively. Thirty one (91%) patients survived > 1 year, 23 (68%) > 2 years, and 15 (44%) > 3 years postoperatively. All reconstructions remained stable at the most recent follow-ups.

The relatively prolonged survival of patients with multiple myeloma justifies an aggressive surgical approach, which is safe and associated with good local tumor control and functional outcome.

Patients most at risk of osteoporosis are post-menopausal women. However, for many such women, presentation of osteoporosis is only made following their first fragility fracture. Often in the UK, osteoporosis investigation occurs following discharge, and any subsequent secondary prevention starts in the community. This may result in patients with osteoporosis not being investigated or not receiving correct prophylactic treatment.

143 post-menopausal women (av. age 77.7 years) starting secondary osteoporosis prophylaxis following fragility fractures requiring operative intervention were included in this retrospective study. Osteoporosis was defined by DEXA scan using the WHO criteria (122 hip fractures and 21 wrist fractures), following the UK's national guidelines for osteoporosis prophylaxis. Treatment was started following discussion and explanation of treatment with each patient, and either commenced by the surgical team during the acute hospital admission with the fracture, or in an out-patient setting within 6 weeks of the fracture by an orthopaedic specialist nurse. To check compliance, either the patient themselves or the patients' family physician was contacted.

Results showed that 120 of the women (83.9%, 102 hip fractures, and 18 wrist fractures) were still compliant with secondary osteoporosis prophylaxis at an average follow-up of 200 days (5 hip fractures lost to follow-up, 0 wrist fractures). 12 women with hip fractures died (0 wrist fractures), and 6 women stopped taking their prophylaxis (3 hip fractures, 3 wrist fractures): 4 for medical reasons, and 2 for unknown reasons. No women sustained further fractures.

Few studies have previously investigated compliance of osteoporosis secondary prevention, and our results compare favorably. We therefore recommend the prompt commencement of secondary prevention treatment by the orthopaedic surgical team following osteoporotic fractures.

Escalating health care expenditure worldwide is driving the need for effective resource decision-making, with medical practitioners increasingly making complex resource decisions within the context of patient care. Despite raising serious legal and ethical issues in practice, this has attracted little attention in Australia, or internationally. In particular, it is unknown how orthopaedic surgeons perceive their obligations to the individual patient, and the wider community, when rationing care, and how they reconcile competing obligations. This research explores legal and ethical considerations, and resource allocation by Australian orthopaedic surgeons, as a means of achieving public health cost containment driven by macro-level policy and funding decisions. This research found that Australian orthopaedic surgeon's perceptions, and resource allocation decision making, can be explained by understanding how principles of distributive justice challenge, and shift, the traditional medical paradigm. It found that distributive justice, and challenges of macro level health policy and funding decisions, have given rise to two new medical paradigms. Each which try to balance the best interests of individual patients with demands in respect of the sustainability of the health system, in a situation where resources may be constrained. This research shows that while bedside rationing has positioned the medical profession as the gate keepers of resources, it may have left them straddling an increasingly irreconcilable void between the interests of the individual patient and the wider community, with the sustainability of the health system hanging in the balance

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is the most common paediatric hip condition and is a major cause of hip replacement or osteoarthritis in young adults. Due to potential impact on quality of life, every child is checked at birth for unstable hips. Should instability be detected, or the infant has other DDH risk factors, they are referred for an ultrasound exam and orthopaedic surgeon consultation. Since the implementation of a DDH screening program at our institution, the Radiology Department has seen a dramatic increase in hip ultrasounds performed. While helping prevent the complications of missed DDH diagnoses, this program has placed strain on radiology resources, and often families must attend multiple appointments before receiving a diagnosis and beginning treatment. To mitigate this, we have implemented a pilot point-of-care DDH clinic, where an ultrasound technician performs hip ultrasound exams using a portable ultrasound in the orthopaedic clinic in conjunction with surgeon consultation. The aim of this clinic is to enable diagnosis and treatment in one appointment, reduce referral-to-treatment delays, wait times, and decrease costs and travel time for families while also alleviating strain on radiology resources. A point-of-care DDH test clinic was implemented in the Orthopaedic Department at our institution. Patients referred with suspected/confirmed DDH attended a single orthopaedic clinic appointment. An ultrasound technician was present to perform scans in conjunction with the orthopaedic surgeon's clinical assessment. Surveys were distributed at the end of the appointment to collect feedback on the family's satisfaction with the program, as well as other pertinent demographic information (i.e. occupation, geographic location, travel time to hospital). To date, 40 patients have attended the pilot clinic. Families spent an average 61.3 minutes (range 15–420 minutes) traveling to the hospital for an appointment (122.6 minutes round-trip). This program reduced the number of hospital visits for DDH screening from three (initial consultation, radiology, follow-up) to one per patient, saving an average 245.2 minutes of travel time to/from the hospital per family. Appointment time averaged 35.9 minutes and families rated their satisfaction with appointment length an average of 9.6/10 (35/40 families rated satisfaction 10/10, 1 = very unsatisfied, 10 = very satisfied). Additionally, 33/40 families were also asked to rate their satisfaction with check-in/check-out processes (average 9.4/10), ultrasound screening (average 9.9/10), and time with specialist (average 9.9/10). Satisfaction scores did not differ based on variables such as survey taker's gender, occupation, or geographic location. The pilot point-of-care ultrasound DDH clinic has considerably reduced the number of clinic visits and travel time for families, reduced aggregate clinic wait times, and has resulted in high family satisfaction. This specialized clinic may have potential to free up hospital staff time and resources, possibly decreasing wait times in other clinical areas, ultimately improving quality of care for patients and families across our institution

Purpose: Reducing wait times for total hip (THA) or knee (TKA) joint arthroplasty is a Canadian health care priority. Models that maximise the capacity of advanced practice clinicians (nurses, physical therapists, sports medicine specialists) have been established to streamline care. Hospitals across the Hamilton Niagara Haldimand Brant Local Health Integration Network in Ontario collaborated to establish a Regional Joint Assessment Centre (RJAC). This study was designed to profile patients deemed suitable for surgical review, and to examine wait times for THA or TKA in RJAC patients compared to those referred directly to an orthopaedic surgeon’s office. Method: Patients referred to the RJAC between July 2007 and August 2008 with knee or hip OA were included. Self-reported function was evaluated using the Oxford Hip and Knee Score that is scored out of 60 (higher scores reflect greater disability). Time to surgery was measured as the number of days from initial review to surgery. Group one consisted of patients that were referred to the RJAC while group two was comprised of patients who were referred directly to a surgeon’s office. Patient characteristics were examined using univariate analyses. Independent t-tests were used to examine between group differences. Results: One hundred thirty-six patients (mean±sd: 68±2 years, body mass index 31±6 kg/m2, 83 females) with 150 hip and/or knee joint problems were reviewed in the RJAC. Of those, only 33% (45/136 patients) were deemed suitable for surgical review. Self-reported function (Oxford Scores) in the group requiring surgical review was significantly worse (40±7, p=0.03) than in those patients deemed unsuitable for surgical review (37±9). The RJAC group waited on average 130 days for THA and 129 days for TKA (below the provincial target of 182 days) while those referred directly to the surgeons’ offices waited significantly longer (194 days for THA and 206 days for TKA, p< 0.001). Conclusion: Patients with hip and knee OA who require surgical review have worse self-reported function than those triaged to conservative care. Wait times for THA or TKA were significantly shorter for patients referred to the RJAC under the new model of care than for those referred directly to an orthopaedic surgeon’s office

Although the introduction of ultraporous metals in the forms of acetabular components and augments has substantially improved the orthopaedic surgeon's ability to reconstruct severely compromised acetabuli, there remain some revision THAs that are beyond the scope of cups, augments, and cages. In situations involving catastrophic bone loss, allograft-prosthetic composites or custom acetabular components may be considered. Custom components offer the potential advantages of immediate, rigid fixation with a superior fit individualised to each patient. These custom triflange components require a preoperative CT scan with three-dimensional (3-D) reconstruction using rapid prototyping technology, which has evolved substantially during the past decade. The surgeon can fine-tune exact component positioning, determine location and length of screws, modify the fixation surface with, for example, the addition of hydroxyapatite, and dictate which screws will be locked to enhance fixation. The general indications for using custom triflange components include: (1) failed prior salvage reconstruction with cage or porous metal construct augments, (2) large contained defects with possible discontinuity, (3) known pelvic discontinuity, and (4) complex multiply surgically treated hips with insufficient bone stock to reconstruct using other means. We previously reported on our center's experience with 23 patients (24 hips) treated with custom triflange components with minimum 2-year follow-up. This method of reconstruction was used in a cohort of patients with Paprosky Type 3B acetabular defects, which represented 3% (30 of 955) of the acetabular revisions we performed during the study period of 2003 to 2012. At a mean follow-up of 4.8 years (range, 2.3 – 9 years) there were four subsequent surgical interventions: two failures secondary to sepsis, and one stem revision and one open reduction internal fixation for periprosthetic femoral fracture. There were two minor complications managed nonoperatively, but all of the components were noted to be well-fixed with no obvious migration or loosening observed on the most recent radiographs. Harris hip scores improved from a mean of 42 (SD ±16) before surgery to 65 (SD ±18) at latest follow-up (p < 0.001). More recently, we participated in a multi-center study of 95 patients treated with reconstruction using custom triflange components who had a mean follow-up of 3.5 years. Pelvic defects included Paprosky Type 2C, 3A, 3B and pelvic discontinuity. Concomitant femoral revision was performed in 21 hips. Implants used a mean of 12 screws with 3 locking screws. Twenty of 95 patients (21%) experienced at least one complication, including 6% dislocation, 6% infection, and 2% femoral-related issues. Implants were ultimately removed in 11% of hips. One hip was revised for possible component loosening. Survivorship with aseptic loosening as the endpoint was 99%. Custom acetabular triflange components represent yet another tool in the reconstructive surgeon's armamentarium. These devices can be helpful in situations of catastrophic bone loss, achieving reliable fixation. Clinical results are inferior to both primary THA and more routine revision THA. Patients and surgeons should be aware of the increased complications associated with these complex hip revisions

Although the introduction of ultraporous metals in the forms of acetabular components and augments has substantially improved the orthopaedic surgeon's ability to reconstruct severely compromised acetabuli, there remain some revision THAs that are beyond the scope of cups, augments, and cages. In situations involving catastrophic bone loss, allograft-prosthetic composites or custom acetabular components may be considered. Custom components offer the potential advantages of immediate, rigid fixation with a superior fit individualised to each patient. These custom triflange components require a pre-operative CT scan with 3-D reconstruction using rapid prototyping technology. The surgeon can fine-tune exact component positioning, determine location and length of screws, modify the fixation surface with, for example, the addition of hydroxyapatite, and dictate which screws will be locked to enhance fixation. The general indications for using custom triflange components include: (1) failed prior salvage reconstruction with cage or porous metal construct augments, (2) large contained defects with possible discontinuity, (3) known pelvic discontinuity, and (4) complex multiply surgically treated hips with insufficient bone stock to reconstruct using other means. The general indications for using custom triflange components include: (1) failed prior salvage reconstruction with cage or porous metal construct augments, (2) large contained defects with possible discontinuity, (3) known pelvic discontinuity, and (4) complex multiply surgically treated hips with insufficient bone stock to reconstruct using other means. We previously reported on our center's experience with 23 patients (24 hips) treated with custom triflange components with minimum 2-year follow-up. This method of reconstruction was used in a cohort of patients with Paprosky Type 3B acetabular defects, which represented 3% (30 of 955) of the acetabular revisions we performed during the study period of 2003 to 2012. At a mean follow-up of 4.8 years (range, 2.3–9 years) there were 4 subsequent surgical interventions: 2 failures secondary to sepsis, and 1 stem revision and 1 open reduction internal fixation for periprosthetic femoral fracture. There were two minor complications managed non-operatively, but all of the components were noted to be well-fixed with no obvious migration or loosening observed on the most recent radiographs. Harris Hip Scores improved from a mean of 42 (SD ±16) before surgery to 65 (SD ±18) at latest follow-up (p<0.001). More recently, we participated in a multi-center study of 95 patients treated with reconstruction using custom triflange components w a mean follow-up of 3.5 years. Pelvic defects included Paprosky Type 2C, 3A, 3B and pelvic discontinuity. Concomitant femoral revision was performed in 21 hips. Implants used a mean of 12 screws with 3 locking screws. Twenty of 95 patients (21%) experienced at least one complication, including 6% dislocation, 6% infection, and 2% femoral-related issues. Implants were ultimately removed in 11% of hips. One hip was revised for possible component loosening. Survivorship with aseptic loosening as the endpoint was 99%. Custom acetabular triflange components represent yet another tool in the reconstructive surgeon's armamentarium. These devices can be helpful in situations of catastrophic bone loss, achieving reliable fixation. Clinical results are inferior to both primary THA and more routine revision THA. Patients and surgeons should be aware of the increased complications associated with these complex hip revisions

Fresh-frozen allograft bone is frequently used in orthopaedic surgery. We investigated the incidence of allograft-related infection and analysed the outcomes of recipients of bacterial culture-positive allografts from our single-institute bone bank during bone transplantation. The fresh-frozen allografts were harvested in a strict sterile environment during total joint arthroplasty surgery and immediately stored in a freezer at −78° to −68° C after packing. Between January 2007 and December 2012, 2024 patients received 2083 allografts with a minimum of 12 months of follow-up. The overall allograft-associated infection rate was 1.2% (24/2024). Swab cultures of 2083 allografts taken before implantation revealed 21 (1.0%) positive findings. The 21 recipients were given various antibiotics at the individual orthopaedic surgeon's discretion. At the latest follow-up, none of these 21 recipients displayed clinical signs of infection following treatment. Based on these findings, we conclude that an incidental positive culture finding for allografts does not correlate with subsequent surgical site infection. Additional prolonged post-operative antibiotic therapy may not be necessary for recipients of fresh-frozen bone allograft with positive culture findings. Chang Gung Medical Foundation

Aims

To investigate if preoperative CT improves detection of unstable trochanteric hip fractures.

Aims

Hip dysplasia (HD) leads to premature osteoarthritis. Timely detection and correction of HD has been shown to improve pain, functional status, and hip longevity. Several time-consuming radiological measurements are currently used to confirm HD. An artificial intelligence (AI) software named HIPPO automatically locates anatomical landmarks on anteroposterior pelvis radiographs and performs the needed measurements. The primary aim of this study was to assess the reliability of this tool as compared to multi-reader evaluation in clinically proven cases of adult HD. The secondary aims were to assess the time savings achieved and evaluate inter-reader assessment.

Although the introduction of ultraporous metals in the forms of acetabular components and augments has substantially improved the orthopaedic surgeon's ability to reconstruct severely compromised acetabuli, there remain some revision THAs that are beyond the scope of cups, augments, and cages. In situations involving catastrophic bone loss, allograft-prosthetic composites or custom acetabular components may be considered. Custom components offer the potential advantages of immediate, rigid fixation with a superior fit individualised to each patient. These custom triflange components require a pre-operative CT scan with three-dimensional (3-D) reconstruction using rapid prototyping technology, which has evolved substantially during the past decade. The surgeon can fine-tune exact component positioning, determine location and length of screws, modify the fixation surface with, for example, the addition of hydroxyapatite, and dictate which screws will be locked to enhance fixation. The general indications for using custom triflange components include: (1) failed prior salvage reconstruction with cage or porous metal construct augments, (2) large contained defects with possible discontinuity, (3) known pelvic discontinuity, and (4) complex multiply surgically treated hips with insufficient bone stock to reconstruct using other means. The general indications for using custom triflange components include: (1) failed prior salvage reconstruction with cage or porous metal construct augments, (2) large contained defects with possible discontinuity, (3) known pelvic discontinuity, and (4) complex multiply surgically treated hips with insufficient bone stock to reconstruct using other means. We previously reported on our center's experience with 23 patients (24 hips) treated with custom triflange components with minimum 2-year follow-up. This method of reconstruction was used in a cohort of patients with Paprosky Type 3B acetabular defects, which represented 3% (30 of 955) of the acetabular revisions we performed during the study period of 2003 to 2012. At a mean follow-up of 4.8 years (range, 2.3–9 years) there were 4 subsequent surgical interventions: 2 failures secondary to sepsis, and 1 stem revision and 1 open reduction internal fixation for periprosthetic femoral fracture. There were 2 minor complications managed nonoperatively, but all of the components were noted to be well-fixed with no obvious migration or loosening observed on the most recent radiographs. Harris hip scores improved from a mean of 42 (SD ± 16) before surgery to 65 (SD ± 18) at latest follow-up (p<0.001). More recently, we participated in a multi-center study of 95 patients treated with reconstruction using custom triflange components who had a mean follow-up of 3.5 years. Pelvic defects included Paprosky Type 2C, 3A, 3B and pelvic discontinuity. Concomitant femoral revision was performed in 21 hips. Implants used a mean of 12 screws with 3 locking screws. Twenty of 95 patients (21%) experienced at least one complication, including 6% dislocation, 6% infection, and 2% femoral-related issues. Implants were ultimately removed in 11% of hips. One hip was revised for possible component loosening. Survivorship with aseptic loosening as the endpoint was 99%,. Custom acetabular triflange components represent yet another tool in the reconstructive surgeon's armamentarium. These devices can be helpful in situations of catastrophic bone loss, achieving reliable fixation. Clinical results are inferior to both primary THA and more routine revision THA. Patients and surgeons should be aware of the increased complications associated with these complex hip revisions

Background: It is taught that ruptures of the Achilles tendon occur at the musculotendinous junction and indeed ultrasound reports will often confirm this. This study investigates the orthopaedic surgeon’s understanding of the clinical significance and location of the musculotendinous junction. Materials and Methods: A survey of orthopaedic surgeons at a regional orthopaedic meeting. Two transverse lines were drawn on a photograph of a lower limb identifying the musculotendinous junction, and marking the highest level at which they would consider a surgical repair. They were asked about their understanding of the term “musculotendinous junction”. Results: Twenty two delegates of various degrees of seniority responded. Surgeons estimate of musculotendinous junction level: 10.1 cm. Anatomical level of musculotendinous junction: 5.51 cm. Average highest level for considering surgical intervention: 8.71 cm. Conclusions: There is confusion regarding the exact location and nature of the Achilles musculotendinous junction amongst orthopaedic surgeons. Particular care is advised when interpreting ultrasound reports. An Achilles surgical zone has been identified (0–10 cm from the calcaneal insertion) within which the majority of surgeons would consider surgical intervention for rupture

Introduction. Sonicate fluid cultures (SFC) are more sensitive than conventional microbiological methods in identifying periprosthetic joint infections (PJI), because sonication enables a sampling of the causative bacteria directly from the surface of the endoprosthetic components. Because of their high sensitivity SFC can be positive while all other microbiological methods remain negative. It is therefore difficult to interpret a single SFC as being truly or falsely positive. The aim of this prospective study was to improve the interpretation of SFC in the diagnosis of PJI in patients after total hip arthroplasty through the use of multiple SFC. Material and methods. 102 patients of which 37 had a defined PJI according to the following criteria were included: intraarticular pus or a sinus tract, a periprosthetic membrane (PM) indicative of infection, or a positive microbiological culture in a minimum of 2 separate microbiological samples. A single positive microbiological sample was classified as false positive. In 35 patients multiple SFC were acquired from the separate endoprosthetic components. Results. Out of all individual diagnostic parameters SFC achieved the highest sensitivity with 89% and a specificity of 72%. PM was able to achieve a sensitivity of 78% for the detection of PJI. Out of the 35 patients with multiple SFC it was possible to newly diagnose a PJI in 3 cases solely through multiple isolations of the same bacterial species in SFC. In the same group it was also possible to exclude the suspicion of PJI in 3 cases, because only one of the multiple samples presented a bacterial isolation, while the other samples remained negative. When multiple SFC were employed it was possible to increase the sensitivity to 100% and the specificity to 85%. Conclusion. In our study SFC were the most sensitive diagnostic parameter for detection of PJI and our results show that it is possible to further increase the sensitivity and specificity of SFC when multiple samples are used. The acquisition of multiple SFC facilitate the diagnosis of PJI, since they are able to present the 2 positive bacterial isolations that are needed for making the diagnosis of PJI. Multiple SFC can help to solve the orthopaedic surgeon's diagnostic dilemma of having to interpret a single positive bacterial isolation by confirming the bacterial isolation in a second SFC sample

Purpose: The objective of this study is to compare items from patient-reported questionnaires measuring musculoskeletal outcomes with items generated by pre-and post-operative ankle arthrodesis and arthroplasty patients using the Patient-Specific Index (PSI-P). The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) was used as an external reference. Method: A literature review identified six questionnaires that assess lower extremity outcomes (AAOS, patient-reported portion of AOFAS, FFI, LEFS, SMFA, WOMAC). Surgical patients (n=142) from an orthopaedic surgeon’s practice completed the patient-selected items from PSI-P. Items from questionnaires and PSI-P were coded by three reviewers and linked to the ICF. The ICF is divided into four components (Body Functions and Structures, Activities and Participation, Environmental Factors, and Personal Factors) which are then further divided into second level categories. A higher number of second level categories would indicate a questionnaire that captures a broader range of experiences. Results: Patient’s responses from PSI-P identified 690 meaningful concepts that were linked to 45 second level ICF categories. Most PSI-P responses fell into Activities and Participation (60.6%) and Body Functions and Body Structures (35.2%) including the second level categories Walking (19.1%), Pain (16.5%), and Recreation and Leisure (15.4%). There was no statistical difference between arthrodesis and arthroplasty patients nor between pre-operative versus postoperative patients in terms of the proportion of patient responses that fell into each ICF component. A total of 237 meaningful concepts were identified in the 6 questionnaires studied and linked to 38 second level ICF categories. Overall, SMFA addressed the most number of second level categories and had the closest proportion of Body Function (23.0%) and Activities and Participation (68.9%) concepts as compared to PSI-P. The patient-reported portion of AOFAS addressed the fewest categories. LEFS only contained items from Activities and Participation. AAOS was the only questionnaire to address the issue of ‘swelling’, though it represented 4.9% of all PSI-P responses. Conclusion: Questionnaires differ largely in their content and no single questionnaire captured all of the concerns identified by PSI-P. This analysis will guide us in the development of a new and more comprehensive instrument for evaluating ankle outcomes following fusion or replacement

Current evidence suggests that in Australia more than 80% of individuals are not receiving treatment for osteoporosis following an initial osteoporotic fracture. The earliest opportunity to identify many individuals with osteoporosis is following their first osteoporotic fracture, which is usually less severe than subsequent fractures. As these fractures are usually treated by orthopaedic surgeons it was decided to survey Australian orthopaedic surgeons to determine their understanding, attitudes and involvement in the management of osteoporosis. Methods: The AOA in conjunction with the BJD distributed a questionnaire to 945 members. The results of 449 (48%) returned questionnaires were collated and sent to the Swedish National Competence Centre for Musculo-skeletal Disorders for analysis. Results: Responding surgeons claimed to treat at least 24,000 osteoporotic fractures per year. Sixty per cent felt they had ‘none’ or ‘insufficient’ training in osteoporosis and considered they had ‘no’ or only ‘slight knowledge’ in managing the condition. Approximately 65% of surgeons either ‘never’ or only ‘sometimes’ initiated investigation or treatment of patients with osteoporotic fractures; only 11% ‘always’ or ‘very often’ initiated investigation or treatment. If an osteoporotic fracture is suspected most (70%) refer to a GP or osteoporosis specialist, with only 22% evaluating the condition themselves. Although 46% claimed that they referred patients for a BMD study always or most of the time, only 14% did so routinely. Fifty percent felt it was the GP’s responsibility to identify and initiate the evaluation of the underlying osteoporosis of patients with fragility fractures, compared with 29% who considered that this was the orthopaedic surgeon’s responsibility. Eighty five per cent of the respondents do not prescribe any pharmacological treatment for osteoporosis management. Most commonly (36%) there was a preference for surgery rather than drug prescription. Twenty four percent had access to a specific osteoporosis team for treating osteoporosis. No experience with treating osteoporosis (23%) and no formal education in osteoporosis (16%) were other common reasons. Very few orthopaedic surgeons felt it was their responsibility to treat osteoporosis, however 52% were interested in attending a course on osteoporosis. The findings are contrasted with those of an international study conducted by the Bone and Joint Decade and the International Osteoporosis Foundation, using the same questionnaire. Conclusions: The evidence of under- treatment of osteoporosis after first fragility fractures, suggests that it may be necessary for orthopaedic surgeons to re-evaluate their approach to the management of osteoporosis, either by themselves or others. Further educational opportunities in this area should be considered

Introduction: Femoral neck failure due to avascular necrosis (AVN) is one of the most significant complications following resurfacing hip arthroplasty. It is likely that the surgical approach is one of the factors influenc-ing the development of AVN. Positron emission tomography (PET) is the only form of imaging that allows visualisation of bone metabolic activity deep to a metal surface. Objectives: To establish the reliability and accuracy of PET using fluorine-18 to evaluate viability of the femoral head and neck after resurfacing hip arthroplasty. To assess the viability of ten proximal femora after Birmingham resurfacing hip arthroplasty via a modified lateral approach. Design: A convenience case series of ten patients taken from the first fifteen from one orthopaedic surgeon’s experience of Birmingham resurfacing hip arthroplasty. Setting: The PET unit of a major urban teaching hospital with a large academic orthopaedic department. Participants: Patients that had undergone unilateral Birmingham resurfacing hip arthroplasty via a modified lateral approach were asked to volunteer for the study. The main criterion for inclusion was ease of attendance for imaging. Intervention: Participants were given a single intravenous dose of 250MBq fluorine-18. After a period of 40 minutes uptake time, PET images of adjacent, sequential 10cm transverse sections including both acetabulae and proximal femora were obtained. Main Outcome Measures: Images were reconstructed to allow relative quantification of uptake between operated and non-operated femoral heads and necks. Results: PET imaging was successful in all subjects and demonstrated activity within the resurfaced femoral heads and femoral necks. No evidence of AVN was found. Conclusions: Static positron emission tomography using fluorine-18 is an accurate and reliable method of assessing femoral head and neck viability after resurfacing hip arthroplasty. No evidence of avascular necrosis was found in this initial series of patients that had undergone Birmingham resurfacing hip arthroplasty via a modified lateral approach

The Taylor Spatial Frame is a new external ring fixation system for correction of multi-planar deformities of the extremities. We report the first 100 consecutive cases treated with this system at the Bristol Limb Reconstruction Unit from November 1999. The Taylor Spatial Frame incorporates the technology of a virtual hinge and a Stewart Gough Platform. With the use of computer software it is capable of adjustments to within 1 degree and 0.5mm accuracy. Deformities are measured on plain radiographs. Required corrections over any period of time are calculated and a printed prescriptiion of daily adjustments is given to the patients to perform themselves at home. The following conditions were treated: Non-union (44), malunion (16), Leg length discrepancy (14), limb deformity (13), and acute fractures (13). The aims of frame treatment were non-union treatment (28), bone transport (12), acute fracture healing (12), correction of deformity (28), leg lengthening (15), and arthrodesis (5). Most cases involved the tibia (77) but the frame was also used on the femur (13), knee (3), ankle (4), humerus (2), and forearm (1). Complete correction of deformity was achieved in all but 7 patients. Union was achieved in 99 cases. All non unions united without bone graft. Mean transport of 46mm and lengthening of 38mm was achieved. 1 arthrodesis failed to unite. All fractures united without any residual deformity. Mean treatment time was 169 days (range 43 to 401). There was 100% compliance with patients performing adjustments themselves. Minor pin site problems were common (34 patients) but only 3 required debridement. Other problems included wire breakage (10), pain (3), peroneal nerve palsy (1) and DVT (1). 15 knees and 11 ankles developed stiffness which resolved. This study demonstrates the role of the Taylor Spatial Frame as an extremely versatile, accurate and safe new tool at the orthopaedic surgeon’s disposal in limb reconstruction and trauma surgery

Background and objective: in 2003 in its publication ‘Care of fragility fracture patients’ The British Orthopaedic Association highlighted the orthopaedic surgeon’s role in assessment and management of patients at high risk from osteoporosis. In general such secondary prevention of osteoporosis is carried out poorly by orthopaedic surgeons. This audit aimed to determine if software which identifies patients at high risk from osteoporosis from clinic letters, improves orthopaedic surgeons’ referral rates for DEXA. Methods: two audit cycles were carried out using local guidelines. The audits concerned patients over 50 years having sustained a fragility fracture of the distal radius. According to local guidelines all such patients should undergo DEXA. Patients were identified from hospital records and the number referred for DEXA determined. Those who had undergone DEXA in the year prior to fracture were excluded. The baseline audit was from April to June 2004 inclusive followed by closure of the loop between October and December 2004 following reinforcement of guidelines. Following continued poor referral rates at this point the software programme was introduced. It identifies patient age and key words in dictated clinic letters when they are being printed, for example distal radial fracture. Appropriate patients have computer generated osteoporosis advice included at the bottom of the general practitioner letter along with a DEXA referral form which General Practitioners complete. A further audit using similar methods was carried out 3 months after the software introduction (January 2006). Results: baseline audit identified forty-three patients (36 women and 7 men) with a mean age of 73 years, 3 were referred for DEXA (7%). Following reinforcement of guidelines fifty-two patients were identified (46 women and 6 men) with a mean age of 68 years, 16 (31%) were referred. At re-audit (following the introduction of the software programme) 45 patients were identified (38 women and 7 men) with an average age of 71 years. 30 (67%) were referred for DEXA. This is a significant improvement using a Chi squared analysis. Conclusion: the software programme significantly improves orthopaedic surgeon identification of patients at high risk of osteoporosis and referral rates for DEXA