Dual plate constructs have become an increasingly common fixation technique for midshaft clavicle fractures and typically involve the use of mini-fragment plates. The goal of this technique is to reduce plate prominence and implant irritation, as these are common reasons for revision surgery. However, limited biomechanical data exist for these lower-profile constructs. The study aim was to compare dual mini-fragment orthogonal plating to traditional small-fragment clavicle plates for biomechanical non-inferiority and to determine if an optimal plate configuration could be identified, using a cadaveric model. Twenty-four cadaveric clavicles were randomized to one of six groups (n=4 per group), stratified by CT-based bone mineral content (BMC). The six different plating configurations compared were: pre-contoured superior or anterior fixation using a single 3.5-mm LC-DC plate, and four different dual-plating constructs utilizing 2.4-mm and 2.7-mm reconstruction or LC-DC plates. The clavicles were plated and then osteotomized to create an inferior butterfly fracture, which was then fixed with a single interfragmentary screw (OTA 15.2B). Axial, torsional, and bending (anterior and superior surface loading) stiffness were determined for each construct through non-destructive cyclic testing, using an MTS 858 Bionix materials testing system. This was followed by a load-to-failure test in three-point superior-surface bending. Kruskal-Wallace H and Mann-Whitney U were used to test for statistical significance. There were no significant differences in BMC (median 7.9 g, range 4.2-13.8 g) for the six groups (p=1.000). For axial stiffness, the two dual-plate constructs with a superior 2.4-mm and anterior 2.7-mm plate (either reconstruction or LC-DC) were significantly stiffer than the other four constructs (p=0.021). For both superior and anterior bending, the superior 2.4-mm and anterior 2.7-mm plate constructs were significantly stiffer when compared to the 3.5-mm superior plate (p=0.043). In addition, a 3.5-mm plate placed anterior was a stiffer construct than a superior 3.5-mm plate (p=0.043). No significant differences were found in torsional stiffness or load-to-failure between the different constructs. Dual plating using mini-fragment plates is biomechanically superior for fixation of midshaft clavicle fractures when compared to a single superior 3.5-mm plate and has similar biomechanical properties to a 3.5-mm plate placed anteriorly. With the exception of axial stiffness, no significant differences were found when different dual plating constructs were compared to each other. However, placing a 2.4-mm plate superiorly in combination with a 2.7-mm plate anteriorly might be the optimal construct, given the biomechanical superiority over the 3.5-mm plate placed superior

To evaluate if clinical recovery following midshaft clavicle fracture is associated with nonunion and determine if this has superior predictive value compared to estimation at time of injury. A prospective study of all patients (≥16 years) who sustained a displaced midshaft clavicle fracture was performed. We assessed patient demographics, injury factors, functional scores and radiographic predictors with a standardized protocol at six-weeks. Conditional-stepwise regression was used to assess which factors independently predicted nonunion at six-months post-injury determined by CT. The nonunion predictor six-week model (NUP6) was compared against a previously validated model based on factors available at time of injury (NUP0-smoking, comminution and fracture displacement). 200 patients completed follow-up at six months. The nonunion rate was 14% (27/200). Of the functional scores, the QuickDASH had the highest accuracy on receiver-operator-characteristic (ROC) curve analysis with a 39.8 threshold, above which was associated with nonunion (Area Under Curve (AUC) 76.8%, p<0.001). On regression modelling QuickDASH ≥40 (p=0.001), no callus on radiograph (p=0.004) and fracture movement on examination (p=0.001) were significant predictors of nonunion. If none were present the predicted nonunion risk was 3%, found in 40% of the cohort (n=80/200). Conversely if two or more were present, found in 23.5% of the cohort, the predicted nonunion risk was 60%. The NUP6 model appeared to have superior accuracy when compared to the NUP0 model on ROC curve analysis (AUC 87.3% vs 64.8% respectively). Delayed assessment at six-weeks following displaced clavicle fracture enables a more accurate prediction of fracture healing

The aim of this study was to define the long-term outcome following adolescent clavicle fracture. We retrospectively reviewed all adolescent fractures presenting to our region (13–17years) over a 10-year period. Patient reported outcomes were undertaken at a minimum of 4 years post-injury (QuickDASH and EQ-5D) in completely displaced midshaft fractures (Edinburgh 2B, >2cm displacement, n=50) and angulated midshaft fractures (Edinburgh 2A2, >30 degrees angulation, n=32). 677 clavicle fractures were analysed. The median age was 14.8 (IQR 14.0–15.7) and 89% were male. The majority were midshaft (n=606, 89.5%) with either angulation (39.8%) or simple fully displaced (39.1%). Only 3% of midshaft fractures underwent acute fixation (n=18/606), all of which were fully displaced. The incidence of refracture following non-operative management of midshaft fractures was 3.2% (n=19/588), all united with non-operative management. Fracture type, severity of angulation or displacement was not associated with risk of refracture. There was one case of non-union encountered following non-operative management of all displaced midshaft fractures (0.4%, n=1/245). At a mean of 7.6 years following injury, non-operative management of both displaced and angulated fractures had a median QuickDASH was 0.0 (IQR 0.0–2.3), EQ-5D was 1.0 (IQR 1.0–1.0). 97% of angulated fractures and 94% of displaced fractures were satisfied with their final shoulder function. We conclude that Non-operative management of adolescent midshaft clavicle fractures result in excellent functional outcomes with a low rate of complications at long-term follow up. The relative indications for surgical intervention for clavicle fractures in adults do not appear to be applicable to adolescents

Aims. To evaluate if union of clavicle fractures can be predicted at six weeks post-injury by the presence of bridging callus on ultrasound. Methods. Adult patients managed nonoperatively with a displaced mid-shaft clavicle were recruited prospectively. Ultrasound evaluation of the fracture was undertaken to determine if sonographic bridging callus was present. Clinical risk factors at six weeks were used to stratify patients at high risk of nonunion with a combination of Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH) ≥ 40, fracture movement on examination, or absence of callus on radiograph. Results. A total of 112 patients completed follow-up at six months with a nonunion incidence of 16.7% (n = 18/112). Sonographic bridging callus was detected in 62.5% (n = 70/112) of the cohort at six weeks post-injury. If present, union occurred in 98.6% of the fractures (n = 69/70). If absent, nonunion developed in 40.5% of cases (n = 17/42). The sensitivity to predict union with sonographic bridging callus at six weeks was 73.4% and the specificity was 94.4%. Regression analysis found that failure to detect sonographic bridging callus at six weeks was associated with older age, female sex, simple fracture pattern, smoking, and greater fracture displacement (Nagelkerke R. 2. = 0.48). Of the cohort, 30.4% (n = 34/112) had absent sonographic bridging callus in addition to one or more of the clinical risk factors at six weeks that predispose to nonunion. If one was present the nonunion rate was 35%, 60% with two, and 100% when combined with all three. Conclusion. Ultrasound combined with clinical risk factors can accurately predict fracture healing at six weeks following a displaced midshaft clavicle fracture. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(2):113–121

Abstract. Objectives. We aimed to evaluate if union of clavicle fractures can be predicted at six weeks post-injury by the presence of bridging callus detected by ultrasound. Methods. Adult patients who sustained a displaced midshaft clavicle were recruited prospectively. We assessed patient demographics, functional scores and radiographic predictors with a standardized protocol at six weeks. Ultrasound evaluation of the fracture site was undertaken to determine if sonographic bridging callus was present. Nonunion was determined by CT scanning at six months post-injury. Clinical features at six weeks were used to stratify patients at high risk of nonunion and a QuickDASH ≥40, fracture movement on examination or absence of callus on radiograph. Results. 112 patients completed follow-up at six months with a nonunion incidence of 17% (n=18/112). Sonographic bridging callus was detected in 62.5% (n=70/112) of the cohort at six weeks post-injury. If present, union occurred in 98.6% of the fractures (n=69/70). If absent, nonunion developed in 40.5% of cases (n=17/42). The sensitivity to predict union with sonographic bridging callus at six weeks was 73.4% and the specificity was 94.4%. Regression analysis found failure to detect sonographic bridging callus at six weeks was associated with nonunion, older age, female sex, and greater overall fracture displacement (Nagelkerke R2=0.60). Of the cohort, 30.4% (n=34/112) had absent sonographic bridging callus at six weeks in combination with one or more of the ‘high risk’ clinical features. If one was present the nonunion rate was 47.1%, increasing to 60% with two risk factors and 100% when combined with all three. Conclusions. Ultrasound can accurately predict fracture healing at six weeks following a displaced midshaft clavicle fracture. When combined with poor clinical recovery this could be used to target patients for early operative intervention. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Aims

The management of mid-shaft clavicle fractures (MSCFs) has evolved over the last three decades. Controversy exists over which specific fracture patterns to treat and when. This review aims to synthesize the literature in order to formulate an appropriate management algorithm for these injuries in both adolescents and adults.

Aims

The aims of this network meta-analysis (NMA) were to examine nonunion rates and functional outcomes following various operative and nonoperative treatments for displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures.

Aims

It is unclear whether acute plate fixation facilitates earlier return of normal shoulder function following a displaced mid-shaft clavicular fracture compared with nonoperative management when union occurs. The primary aim of this study was to establish whether acute plate fixation was associated with a greater return of normal shoulder function when compared with nonoperative management in patients who unite their fractures. The secondary aim was to investigate whether there were identifiable predictors associated with return of normal shoulder function in patients who achieve union with nonoperative management.

Introduction

Clavicle fractures accounting for 3–5% of all adult fractures are usually treated non-operatively. There is an increasing trend towards their surgical fixation.

The primary aim of this study was to undertake a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of acute fixation versus conservative management of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. The secondary aim was to conduct a sensitivity analysis of patient characteristics that may influence a threshold of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life year gained (QALY). A CEA was conducted from a randomised control trial comparing conservative management (n=92) to acute plate fixation (n=86) of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. The incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) was used to express the cost per QALY. The short form 6-dimensional (SF-6D) score was the preference based index to calculate the cost per QALY. The 12-month SF-6D advantage of acute fixation over conservative management was 0.0085 (p=0.464) with a mean cost difference of £4,096.22 and resultant ICER of £481,908.24/QALY. For a threshold of £20,000/QALY the benefit of acute fixation would need to be present for 24.1 years. Linear regression analysis identified nonunion as the only independent factor to influence the SF-6D at 12-months (p<0.001). Conservatively managed fractures that resulted in a nonunion (n=16) had a significantly worse SF-6D compared to acute fixation (0.0723, p=0.001) with comparable healthcare cost at 12-months (£170.12 difference). Modelling the ICER of acute fixation against those complicated by a nonunion proved to be cost effective at £2,352.97/QALY at 12-months. Routine plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures is not cost-effective. Patients with nonunion after conservative management have increased morbidity with comparable expense to those undergoing acute fixation which suggests targeting these patients is a more cost-effective strategy

Background:. Displaced midshaft clavicle fractures unite well in children less than 12 years old, owing to their inherent ability to remodel bone. In adolescents, remodeling occurs less and deformity or shortening can result. Recent literature in adults shows improved outcomes of these fractures with operative treatment. It has been suggested that these results may translate to adolescents. Study Objective:. To assess the effectiveness of titanium elastic TEN nails in the treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in adolescents. Methods:. Adolescent patients (age 12 to 18) with closed displaced midshaft clavicle fractures, sustained between 2008 and 2014, were treated operatively by a single surgeon, who inserted a TEN nail in an unreamed fashion from the sternal end of the clavicle. Post-operatively, patients were immobilised in a sling for 6 weeks. The nail was removed routinely at 12 weeks. All patients were assessed by the surgeon at 24 weeks with regards to the radiological outcome, Constant shoulder score, scar quality and complications. Results:. Thirteen patients, 9 males and 4 females (mean age 14,2 years) were assessed. Eleven patients had complete union by 6 weeks and the remaining two by 12 weeks. The Constant score was graded below 11 for all patients by 12 weeks follow up and all patients were satisfied with their scars after 24 weeks. Two patients developed complications: in one, the nail perforated the posterior cortex of the lateral fragment and the other developed a haematoma. Conclusion:. Operative treatment with a TEN nail is a safe, minimally invasive and reliable treatment method for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in adolescents resulting in a satisfactory surgical outcome

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of clavicular shortening, measured by three-dimensional computerized tomography (3DCT), on functional outcomes and satisfaction in patients with healed, displaced, midshaft clavicle fractures up to one year following injury. The data used in this study were collected as part of a multicenter, prospective randomized control trial comparing open reduction and plate fixation with nonoperative treatment for displaced midshaft clavicle factures. Patients who were randomized to nonoperative treatment and who had healed by one year were included. Clavicle shortening relative to the uninjured contralateral clavicle was measured on 3DCT. Outcome analysis was conducted at six weeks, three months, six months and one year following injury and included the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), Constant and Short Form-12 (SF-12) scores, and patient satisfaction. 48 patients were included. The mean shortening of injured clavicles, relative to the contralateral side, was 11mm (+/− 7.6mm) with a mean proportional shortening of 8percnt;. Proportional shortening did not significantly correlate with the DASH (p>0.42), Constant (p>0.32) or SF-12 (p>0.08) scores at any time point. There was no significant difference in the mean DASH or Constant scores at any followup time point both when the cut off for shortening was defined as one centimeter (p>0.11) or two centimeters (p>0.35). There was no significant difference in clavicle shortening between satisfied and unsatisfied patients (p>0.49). This study demonstrated no association between shortening and functional outcome or satisfaction in patients with healed, displaced, midshaft clavicle fractures up to one year following injury

Non-union has traditionally been considered a rare complication following the non-operative management of clavicle fractures. Recent studies demonstrate higher rates of non-union in adults with displaced fractures, yet the variables predicting non-union remain unclear. We evaluated the prevalence and risk factors for non-union following displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in a large consecutive series of patients managed non-operatively. 1097 consecutive adults (mean age 26.1yrs) with displaced midshaft clavicle fractures treated non-operatively in our Unit were included. All patients were interviewed, examined and underwent radiological assessment within a week of injury. All patients were managed in a sling for two weeks followed by early mobilization. All patients were followed-up until clinical and radiological confirmation of union. Non-union was defined clinically as pain or mobility of the fracture segments on stressing, and radiologically as failure of cortical bridging by 6 months. 198 (18%) of patients had evidence of non-union at 6 months. Patient factors associated with non-union included increasing age, smoking and the presence of medical comorbidities (p<0.05). Injury-related factors associated with non-union included increasing fragment translation and displacement, and injury pattern (Edinburgh 2B2: comminuted segmental fracture)(p<0.01). We present the largest series reporting prevalence and risk factors for non-union following conservatively treated, displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. These fractures can no longer be viewed as a single clinical entity, but as a spectrum of injuries each requiring individualized assessment and treatment. Increased understanding of the outcomes of these injuries will enable clinicians to better identify those patients that may be better served with primary operative reconstruction

Background. Non-union has traditionally been considered a rare complication following the non-operative management of clavicle fractures. A growing body of evidence has demonstrated higher rates of non-union in adults with displaced fractures. However, the variables that predict non-union in these patients remain unclear. We evaluated the prevalence and risk factors for non-union following displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in a large consecutive series of patients managed non-operatively in our Unit. Materials and Methods. 1097 consecutive adults (mean age 26.1yrs) with displaced midshaft clavicle fractures treated non-operatively in our Unit were included. All patients were interviewed and examined by an orthopaedic trauma surgeon and underwent radiological assessment within a week of injury. All patients were managed in a simple sling for two weeks followed by early mobilization. All patients were followed-up until clinical and radiological confirmation of union. Non-union was defined clinically as the presence of pain or mobility of the fracture segments on stressing, and radiologically as failure of cortical bridging by 6 months. Results. 198 (18%) of patients had evidence of non-union at 6 months. Patient factors significantly associated with non-union included increasing age, smoking and the presence of medical comorbidities (p<0.05). Injury-related factors associated with non-union included Increasing fragment translation and displacement, and a severe pattern of injury (Edinburgh 2B2: comminuted segmental fracture)(p<0.01). Conclusions. We present the largest series reporting the prevalence and risk factors for non-union following conservatively treated, displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. These fractures can no longer be viewed as a single clinical entity, but as a spectrum of injuries each requiring individualized assessment and treatment. Increased understanding of the outcomes of these injuries will enable clinicians to better identify those patients that may be better served with primary operative reconstruction

Purpose. Displaced midshaft clavicular fractures are a common injury with a high occurrence rate in young, active individuals. Non-operative care has traditionally been the standard of care for such fractures, but more recent studies have suggested benefits following primary operative fixation. The purpose of this study was to review the literature on displaced midshaft clavicle fractures, identify randomized controlled trials of operative versus non-operative treatment, and pool the functional outcome and complication rates (including nonunion and symptomatic malunion), to arrive at summary estimates of these outcomes. Method. A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify studies of randomized controlled trials comparing operative versus non-operative care for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. Meeting abstracts were also searched and included in this study. Results. Six randomized controlled trials (n=421 patients, mean Detsky score= 15.2) were identified and included. The nonunion rate was higher in the non-operative group (28/207) then it was in patients treated operatively (3/214) (p<0.001). The rate of symptomatic malunion was higher in the non-operative group (15/207) than the operative group (0/214) (p<0.001). The total complication rate was 71 complications in 214 operative cases (33%), and 93 complications in 207 non-operative cases (45%)(p=0.016). The Constant Shoulder scores (CS) and Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores showed marginally improved (mean 4.1 point increase in CS at one year, mean 5.8 point decrease in DASH at one year) functional values in the operative group: this difference was especially marked in the early post operative period. Conclusion. Operative treatment provided lower complication rates (especially nonunion and symptomatic malunion) and an earlier functional return compared to non-operative treatment. However, there is little evidence at present to show that the long term effects of operative intervention are significantly superior to non-operative care

Midshaft clavicle fractures can be classified into simple or complex/comminuted. The hardest fracture to treat is the severely comminuted and displaced fracture. We retrospectively compared 286 consecutive operatively treated simple (2 and 3 part) fractures with the more complex comminuted (>=4 part) midshaft clavicle fractures, looking at outcome, complication rate and union rate. Between 2008 and 2010 the senior author operated on 286 displaced midshaft clavicle fractures using a plate and screws. In this cohort there were 173 simple (2 and 3 part) fractures and 99 complex (>=4 part) fractures. The operation was performed through a limited incision technique and was standardized. All fractures were fixed with at least 3 screws on either side of the comminution. All patients were up until radiological and clinical union. A standardized questionnaire was used to assess patient satisfaction, return to work, sport and outcome at each postoperative visit. All complications were documented. All fractures eventually went onto union. There were 242 males and 44 females with the average age being 33. The complex fractures had a larger scar, took longer to return to normal motion, work and sport, and took on average 10 weeks to unite compared to 6 weeks in the simple fractures. The infection rate in the simple fractures was 1% and in the complex fractures was 2%. The big difference was the incidence of non union in the complex fractures of 10% compared to 1%; the other main difference was postoperative shoulder stiffness of 3% at 3 months in the complex fractures compared to 1 % in the simple fractures. Plate elevation/irritation was also more prevalent in the complex fractures of 10% compared to 3%. This study clearly shows there is a higher complication rate in complex fractures. Particular attention must be placed on surgical technique and anatomical reduction of these difficult fractures followed closely by postoperative rehabilitation. Future studies of clavicle fractures should specify the type of fracture being treated to give a better understanding of the potential outcome

Sonographic callus may enable assessment of fracture healing. The aim of this study was to establish a reliable method for three-dimensional reconstruction of sonographic callus. Patients that underwent non-operative management of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures and intramedullary nailing of tibia fractures were prospectively recruited and followed to union. Ultrasound scanning was performed at periodical time points following injury. Infra-red tracking technology was used to map each image to a three-dimensional lattice. Criteria was fist established for two-dimensional bridging callus detection in a pilot study. Using echo intensity of the ultrasound image, semi-automated mapping was used to create an anatomic three-dimensional representation of fracture healing. Agreement on the presence of sonographic bridging callus was assessed using the kappa coefficient and intra-class-correlation (ICC) between observers. 112 clavicle fractures and 10 tibia fractures completed follow-up at six months. Sonographic bridging callus was detected in 62.5% (n=70/112) of the clavicles at six weeks post-injury. If present, union occurred in 98.6% of the fractures (n=69/70). If absent, nonunion developed in 40.5% of cases (n=17/42)(73.4%-sensitive and 100%-specific to predict union). Out of 10 tibia fractures, 7 had bridging callus of at least one cortex at 6 weeks and when present all united. Of the three patients lacking sonographic bridging callus, one went onto a nonunion (77.8%-sensitive and 100%-specific to predict union). The ICC for sonographic callus between four reviewers was 0.82 (95% CI 0.68–0.91). Three-dimensional ultrasound reconstruction of bridging callus has the potential to identify impaired fracture healing at an early stage in fracture management

Abstract. Objectives. Clavicle fractures are common, yet debate exists regarding which patients would benefit from conservative versus operative management. Traditionally shortening greater than 2cm has been accepted as an indicator for surgery. However, clavicle length varies between individuals. In a cadaveric study clavicle shortening greater than 15% was suggested to affect outcomes. There is no clinical correlation of this in the literature. In this study we investigate outcomes following middle third clavicle fractures and the effect of percentage shortening on union rates. Methods. We identified a consecutive series of adults with primary midshaft clavicle fractures presenting to our institution from April 2015-March 2017. Clinical records and radiographs were reviewed to elicit outcomes. Time to union was measured against factors including; percentage shortening, displacement, comminution and smoking. Statistical significance was calculated. Results. 127 patients were identified, of whom 90 were managed conservatively and 37 operatively. Fractures were displaced in 86 patients (68%). Mean age was 41.7 years (range 18–89). Mean time to union for displaced fractures was longer than for undisplaced at 13.4 and 8.9 weeks respectively (p=0.0948). Displaced fractures treated operatively had mean time to union of 12.8 weeks, three weeks shorter than those managed conservatively (p=0.0470). Mean time to union for fractures with >15% shortening was 16.0 weeks, nearly double the 8.7 weeks with <15% shortening (p= 0.0241). Smokers had 8 weeks longer time to union (p=0.0082). Nonunion rate was 10% in fractures managed conservatively and 0% in those treated operatively. Complications following operative management were plate removal (13.5%), frozen shoulder (8.1%) and infection (2.9%). Conclusions. Nonunion rate is higher in fractures managed conservatively. Shortening >15% leads to significantly longer union time and should therefore be used as an indicator for surgery. Displacement and smoking also lengthen time to union and should be considered in the operative decision process. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Background. This is a continued assessment of the effectiveness of a locked intramedullary device in the treatment of acute clavicle shaft fractures. Results of patients treated thus far were assessed, including patients reported on previously. Description of methods. Patients admitted with midshaft clavicle fractures were assessed to determine whether operative fixation of the fracture was required. Indications for surgery were midshaft clavicle fractures with 100% displacement; more than 1.5 cm of shortening, presence of a displaced butterfly segment, bilateral clavicle fractures, ipsilateral displaced glenoid neck fractures, skin and neurovascular compromise. Patients that matched the criteria for surgery were treated operatively with an intramedullary locked device by the author. Post-operatively, patients were kept in a shoulder immobilizer for a period of 6 weeks. Patients were invited to attend a scheduled follow-up visit where the data was collected that comprised the review. All patients were assessed by the surgeon, a radiologist, a physiotherapist and an occupational therapist. Scar size and quality, Dash score, Constant Shoulder score, complications and the radiological picture were assessed. Summary of results. 50 patients (52 clavicle fractures – 2 patients sustained bilateral fractures), 28 males and 22 females with a mean age of 30 attended the schedule data collection visit and were included in the study. 48 clavicles achieved complete union with the remaining 4 fractures progressing normally to union at 10 and 12 weeks post surgery. No additional complications than those reported on previously were encountered. Conclusion. Locked intramedullary fixation of clavicle shaft fractures that match the criteria for operative fixation continues to give good results. No non-unions were found and a high level of patient satisfaction was achieved. The operative technique continues to be refined leading to less fixation related complications. MULTIPLE DISCLOSURES

The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of a pre-contoured anatomic plate in the treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures. We treated thirty patients consecutively for middle third clavicle fractures between March 2001 to March 2006. Surgery was performed for acute fractures, non-unions and malunions by a senior surgeon. Fifteen patients were treated by open reduction and internal fixation with a precontoured small fragment clavicle plate (mean age of thirty-eight years). Our control group consisted of a consecutive series of fifteen patients treated by internal fixation with conventional plates (mean age of forty-one years). Ten patients had fixation of their clavicles with a reconstruction plate whilst five patients had fixation with a dynamic compression plate (DCP). Outcomes assessed for both groups were; complications, need for removal of plate, post-operative outcome, and time to union. All patients were followed up for an average of eighteen months (range eight to thirty months). In the pre-contoured plate group none required removal of hardware. Five patients had complications. Three of these patients complained of numbness around the caudal aspect of the wound which subsequently resolved within six to eight weeks of the operation. The remaining two patients suffered from adhesive capsulitis postoperatively. Their symptoms resolved completely after four months. All patients regained full range of motion. All patients went on to clinical and radiological union with average time to union being 4.7 months (range three to ten months). In the conventional plate group, nine patients required removal of their plate. Average time to removal of plate from index operation was 7.7 months (range four to thirteen months). Of the nine plate removals there were two plate breakages, five removals for local soft tissue irritation and two persistent painful non-unions. Three patients required subsequent re-plating for non-unions. All fractures united in this group with mean time to union of 5.4 months (range 2 to 14 months). A pre-contoured clavicle plate provides rigid fixation without compromising plate stiffness and fatigue strength. We have successfully treated patients with acute fractures, nonunions and malunions of midshaft clavicle fractures, where there was gross distortion of normal anatomy. None of our patients required the removal of their plates (minimum follow-up of 8 months). We have also found these plates to be a valuable anatomical template when reconstructing a malunion, nonunion or highly comminuted fracture. In conclusion, this is the first reported series demonstrating the use of anatomical pre-contoured plates for clavicle fractures. They can reduce time spent on intra-operative contouring, are low-profile and thus far, plate removal has not been necessary