Aims

This aim of this study was to analyze the detection rate of rare pathogens in bone and joint infections (BJIs) using metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), and the impact of mNGS on clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Intraoperative histology has a high specificity and sensitivity to identify prosthetic joint infection. However, the usefulness of this technique according to the type of microorganism isolated in the periprosthetic tissue has not previously been studied. Frozen sections and cultures from periprosthetic tissue of 38 revision arthroplasties performed due to prosthetic joint infection were retrospectively reviewed. Frozen sections were evaluated according to Mirras’ criteria (adapted by Feldman). Culture was considered positive when the same microorganism was isolated in at least 2 samples or the presence of pus around the prosthesis. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) was the aetiology in 13 cases, Gram-negative bacilli in 8, S. aureus in 7, Candida sp and Peptococcus sp in 2 and Enterococcus sp, S.pneumoniae and in 1 case each one. No microorganism was isolated in 4 cases. Frozen sections revealed more than 5 neuthrophils per high power field (forty times) in at least five fields in all cases except in 2 out of 13 caused by CNS (15.3%). A revision of the articles that provided information on the aetiology and the histology supports the findings of our study. In conclusion, frozen section using Feldman’s criteria had a 15.3% of false negative cases when CNS was the aetiology of the prosthetic joint infection

Aims. Currently, the most common approach for the management of a chronic PJI is a Two-Stage Replacement; because of success rates exceeding 90% when using an antibiotic impregnated cement spacer. Reliable information regarding the etiologic microorganism and its sensitivities is essential to select the antimicrobial therapy that should be used locally in the bone cement spacer during the first stage surgery as well as to select the appropriate microbiological systemic agent. Diagnostic algorithms focus to the importance of joint aspiration cultures although in the modern literature, preoperative joint aspiration has a broad range of values of sensitivity and the proportion of “dry-aspirations” is not well assessed. This low sensitivity of aspiration fluid samples in chronic-PJI is partly attributable to the fact that the majority of the microorganisms in these infections grow in biofilms attached to the implant. We have developed this biopsy technique in an effort to improve the identification rates of the causative organism. Materials and methods. A sample is harvested through a 4 mm bone trephine and the target is the bone-prosthesis gap. We have compared the results of preoperative PIB with the results of cultures from intra-operative tissue collected during the first stage surgery. In both cases a prolonged culture protocol (10 days) in enrichment media was used. On the basis of this relation, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy were calculated. Results. Twenty-four PIB were done on the 24 patients (10 hips and 14 knees) who subsequently underwent two-stage revision surgery because of high suspicion of PJI between January 2007 and December 2009. A retrospective analysis was performed in these 24 patients (13 women and 11 men) in the mean age of 70 years (from 63 to 88 years old). Nineteen of the cases were primary and 5 were revision arthroplasty. Nineteen patients (79%) were positive for infection from operative tissue cultures. The sensitivity was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.54–0.93); the specificity was 0.80 (95% CI, 0,30–0.99), the positive predictive value was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.67–0.99), the negative predictive value was 0.50 (95% CI, 17.5–82.5) and the accuracy was 0.79. Conclusion. PIB is a useful test to, preoperatively, isolate the infecting bacteria. The values of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy are on the average of the currently published with joint aspiration or biopsy samples cultures. Although comparative study is necessary we believe that the PIB could be useful in cases with high suspicion of PJI and negative joint aspiration cultures and in cases where no fluid is aspired from the joint, in order to preoperatively isolate the infecting bacteria

Introduction

Infection rates following arthroplasty surgery are reported between 1–4%, with considerably higher rates in revision surgery. The associated costs of treating infected arthroplasty cases are over 4 times the cost of primary arthroplasties, with significantly worse functional and satisfaction outcomes. In addition, multiple antibiotic resistant bacteria are developing, so to reduce the infection rates and costs associated with arthroplasty surgery, new preventative methods are required. HINS-light is a novel blue light inactivation technology which kills bacteria through a photodynamic process, and is proven to have bactericidal activity against a wide range of species. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of HINS-light for the inactivation of bacteria isolated from infected arthoplasty cases.

Aim

Propionibacterium acnes is a skin commensal colonizing the deeper structures of the pilous bulb. It is responsible for 5–10% of lower limb prosthetic joint infections (PJI) but accounts for as many as 50% of shoulder arthroplasty infections. P. acnes PJIs characteristically feature limited systemic inflammation, limited polymorphonuclear infiltration and clinical signs compatible with aseptic loosening. All current microbiological definitions of PJI require two or more identical commensal isolates to be recovered from the same procedure to diagnose PJI to increase specificity and rule out contamination. Whereas the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of coagulase negative staphylococci are highly polymorphic and commonly allow the ready distinction of unrelated strains, P. acnes shows a highly stereotypical susceptibility profile and it is impossible to phenotypically assess the clonal relationship of isolates. In order to determine the clonal relationship of multiple P. acnes isolates recovered from arthroplasty revisions, we analyzed by multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) P. acnes isolates grown from PJI in a reference center for bone and joint infection.

Aims. This study aimed to evaluate the BioFire Joint Infection (JI) Panel in cases of hip and knee periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) where conventional microbiology is unclear, and to assess its role as a complementary intraoperative diagnostic tool. Methods. Five groups representing common microbiological scenarios in hip and knee revision arthroplasty were selected from our arthroplasty registry, prospectively maintained PJI databases, and biobank: 1) unexpected-negative cultures (UNCs), 2) unexpected-positive cultures (UPCs), 3) single-positive intraoperative cultures (SPCs), and 4) clearly septic and 5) aseptic cases. In total, 268 archived synovial fluid samples from 195 patients who underwent acute/chronic revision total hip or knee arthroplasty were included. Cases were classified according to the International Consensus Meeting 2018 criteria. JI panel evaluation of synovial fluid was performed, and the results were compared with cultures. Results. The JI panel detected microorganisms in 7/48 (14.5%) and 15/67 (22.4%) cases related to UNCs and SPCs, respectively, but not in cases of UPCs. The correlation between JI panel detection and infection classification criteria for early/late acute and chronic PJI was 46.6%, 73%, and 40%, respectively. Overall, the JI panel identified 12.6% additional microorganisms and three new species. The JI panel pathogen identification showed a sensitivity and specificity of 41.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 33.7 to 49.5) and 91.1% (95% CI 84.7 to 94.9), respectively. In total, 19/195 (9.7%) could have been managed differently and more accurately upon JI panel evaluation. Conclusion. Despite its microbial limitation, JI panel demonstrated clinical usefulness by complementing the traditional methods based on multiple cultures, particularly in PJI with unclear microbiological results. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2024;13(7):353–361

Background. Data regarding the diagnostic value of ultrasound (US)-determined fluid film and joint aspiration prior to revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) for suspected periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) is limited. This study aimed to analyse (1) the value of US-determined fluid film, (2) characterisation of the pre- and intraoperative microbiological spectrum and resistance patterns and (3) the concordance between preoperative synovial fluid and intraoperative culture results. Methods. We analysed 366 US-examinations from 340 patients prior to revision THA. Selected cases were categorized into clearly infected, non-infected and inconclusive, according to the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) 2018 Criteria. If US-determined fluid film was <1mm, no aspiration was performed based on our institutional standard protocol. Patients were grouped into no-aspiration (144/366;[39.3%]), dry-tap (21/366;[5.7%]) and a successful-tap (201/366;[54.9%]). The microbiological spectrum and antibiotic resistance patterns were determined and differences were compared between pre- and intraoperative results. Results. The absence of US-determined fluid film showed no correlation with the presence of hip PJI. Overall, 29.9% cases of the no-aspiration-group had a confirmed PJI. Discrepancies were found in 43.2% between successful taps and intraoperative cultures. The most prevalent microorganisms in preoperative synovial fluid were Staphylococcus epidermidis (20.9%), Staphylococcus aureus (20.9%) and Enterococcus faecalis (9.3%). The most prevalent microorganisms in intraoperative cultures were Staphylococcus epidermidis, Cutibacterium acnes and other coagulase-negative Staphylococci (14.2%). Additional microorganisms were identified in 43.8% intraoperatively. Staphylococcus aureus was more often detected preoperatively (20.9% vs. 5.8%;P=0.003), and Cutibacterium acnes intraoperatively (2.3% vs. 14.4%;P=0.01). There were no differences between the antibiotic resistance patterns of pre- and intraoperative concordant microorganisms. Conclusion. Absence of US-determined fluid film cannot rule out the presence of hip PJI. US-guided joint aspirations is a well-established technique. However, the preoperative analysis of synovial fluid shows high discrepancies especially in Cutibacterium acnes and other rare gram-positive microorganisms compared to intraoperative cultures

Aim. Culture-based conventional methods are still the gold standard to identify microorganisms in hip and knee PJIs diagnosis. However, such approach presents some limitations due to prior antimicrobial treatment or the presence of unusual and fastidious organisms. Molecular techniques, in particular specific real-time and broad-range polymerase chain reaction (PCR), are available for diagnostic use in a suspected PJI. However, limited data is available on their sensitivity and specificity. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a rapid and simple Investigational Use Only (IUO) version of the BioFire® JI multiplex PCR panel when compared to traditional microbiological procedures. Method. Fifty-eight native synovial fluid samples were recovered from 49 patients (female n=26; male =23) who underwent one or multiple septic or aseptic revision arthroplasties of the hip (n=12) and knee (n=46). The JI panel methodology was used either on specimens freshly collected (n=6) or stored at −80°C in our Musculoskeletal Biobank (n=52). The JI panel performance was evaluated by comparison with culture reference methods. Patient's medical records were retrieved from our institutional arthroplasty registry as well as our prospectively maintained PJI infection database. Results. The JI panel identified additional microorganisms in 3/39 (7.7%) positive cases, and a different microorganism in 1/39 (2.6%) sample. Out of 9/58 (15.5%) culture negative samples, two (22%) were positively detected by the JI panel. In total 49/58 (84%) native synovial fluid specimens were positive by culture methods, versus 39/58 (81.2%) with the JI panel. Ten samples are currently under investigation for confirmatory results. Out of 39 positive detections with the JI panel, 35 (89.7%) were concordant with the identified microorganism (n=29 same species; n=6 same genus). The combined information from the JI panel results and clinical records revealed the existence of 6/58 (10.3%) PJIs’ cases which would have required a different antibiotic therapeutic approach. Conclusions. The work presented, provides additional value for the clinical use of the JI panel to the improvement of PJI management in terms of rapid and successful treatment decisions, patient outcome, and healthcare costs. This technique shows high sensitivity to detect PJIs specific microorganisms in both fresh as well frozen native synovial fluid samples, thus emphasizing its use for retrospective studies analysis

Aim. In severe cases of postoperative spinal implant infections (PSII) multiple revision surgeries may be needed. Little is known if changes of the microbiological spectrum and antibiotic resistance pattern occur between revision surgeries. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the microbiological spectrum and antibiotic resistance pattern in patients with multiple revision surgeries for the treatment of PSII. Furthermore, changes of the microbiological spectrum, distribution of mono vs. polymicrobial infections, and changes of the antimicrobial resistance profile in persistent microorganisms were evaluated. Method. A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained single center spine infection database was performed with a minimum follow-up of 3 years. Between 01/2011 and 12/2018, 103 patients underwent 248 revision surgeries for the treatment of PSII. Overall, 20 patients (6 male/14 female) underwent 82 revisions for PSII (median 3; range 2–12). There were 55/82 (67.1%) procedures with a positive microbiological result. Microbiological analysis was performed on tissue and implant sonication fluid. Changes in microbial spectrum and antibiotic resistance pattern between surgeries were evaluated using Chi-Square and Fisher's exact test. Results. In total, 74 microorganisms (83.3% gram-positive; 10.8% gram-negative) were identified. The most common microorganisms were Staphylococcus epidermidis (18.9%) and Cutibacterium acnes (18.9%). All S. epidermidis identified were methicillin-resistant (MRSE). Overall, there were 15/55 (27.3%) polymicrobial infections. The microbiological spectrum changed in 57.1% (20/35) between the revision stages over the entire PSII period. In 42.9% (15/35) the microorganism persisted between the revision surgeries stages. Overall, changes of the antibiotic resistance pattern were seen in 17.4% (8/46) of the detected microorganisms comparing index revision and all subsequent re-revisions. Moreover, higher resistance rates were found for moxifloxacin and for ciprofloxacin at first re-revision surgery compared with index PSII revision. Resistances against vancomycin increased from 4.5% (1/23) at index PSII revision to 7.7% (2/26) at first re-revision surgery. Conclusions. Changes of the microbiological spectrum and the resistance pattern can occur in patients with severe PSII who require multiple revision surgeries. It is important to consider these findings in the antimicrobial treatment of PSII. The microbiological analysis of intraoperative tissue samples should be performed at every revision procedure for PSI

Purpose. Unexpected-positive-intraoperative-cultures (UPIC) in presumed aseptic revision-total-knee-arthroplasties (rTKA) are common, and the clinical significance is not entirely clear. In contrast, in some presumably septic rTKA, an identification of an underlying pathogen was not possible, so called unexpected-negative-intraoperative-cultures (UNIC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate alpha defensin (AD) levels in these patient populations. Methods. In this retrospective analysis of our prospectively maintained biobank, we evaluated synovial AD levels from 143 rTKAs. The 2018-Musculoskeletal Infection Society score (MSIS) was used to define our study groups. Overall, 20 rTKA with UPIC with a minimum of one positive intraoperative culture with MSIS 2-≥6 and 14 UNIC samples with MSIS≥6 were compared to 34 septic culture-positive samples (MSIS ≥6) and 75 aseptic culture-negative (MSIS 0–1) rTKAs. Moreover, we compared the performance of both AD-lateral-flow-assay (ADLF) and an enzyme-linked-immunosorbent-assay (ELISA) to test the presence of AD in native and centrifuged synovial fluid. Concentration of AD determined by ELISA and ADLF methods, as well as microbiological, and histopathological results, serum and synovial parameters along with demographic factors were considered. Results. AD was detected in 31/34 (91.2%) samples from the infected-group and in 14/14 (100%) samples in the UNIC group. All UPIC samples showed a negative AD result. Positive AD samples were highly (p<0.001) associated with culture positive and infection related histopathological results. Moreover, we found significantly (p=0.001) more high-virulent microorganisms 19/34 (55.9%) in the infected-group compared to the UPIC-group (0/20). Samples from the infected group with high virulent microorganisms 17/19 (89.5%) showed a positive AD. The presence of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus epidermis (MRSE) led to increased AD (p=0.003) levels when compared to those determined in samples positive for methicillin susceptible S. epidermdis (MSSE). ELISA and ADLF tests were positive with centrifuged (8/8) and native (8/8) synovial fluid. Conclusion. AD showed a solid diagnostic performance in infected and non-infected revisions, and it provided an additional value in the diagnostic of UPIC and UNIC associated to rTKAs. AD levels produced by patients with PJIs caused by high-virulent microorganisms and MRSE are significantly higher compared to those in patients with PJIs caused by either low-virulent or antibiotic susceptible microorganisms. Centrifugation of synovial fluid had no influence in the outcome of ADLF quantification. Keywords: Alpha-defensin, UPIC, UNIC, revision-knee-arthroplasty

Aim. Bone and joint infections (BJIs) are serious infections requiring early optimized antimicrobial therapy. BJIs can be polymicrobial or caused by fastidious bacteria, and the patient may have received antibiotics prior to sampling, which may decrease the sensitivity of culture-based diagnosis. Furthermore, culture-based diagnosis can take up to 14 days. Molecular approaches can be useful to overcome these concerns. The BioFire® system performs syndromic multiplex PCR in 1 hour, with only a few minutes of sample preparation. The BioFire® Joint Infection (JI) panel (BF-JI), recently FDA-cleared, detects both Gram-positive (n=15) and Gram-negative bacteria (n=14), Candida, and eight antibiotic resistance genes directly from synovial fluids. The aim of this study was to evaluate its performance in acute JIs in real-life conditions. Method. BF-JI was performed on synovial fluid from patients with clinical suspicion of acute JI, either septic arthritis or periprosthetic JI, in 6 French centers. The results of BF-JI were compared with the results of culture of synovial fluid and other concomitantly collected osteoarticular samples obtained in routine testing in the clinical microbiology laboratory. Results. From July 2021 to May 2022, 319 patients (including 10 children < 5y and 136 periprosthetic infections) had been included in the study. The BF-JI test was invalid for one patient (not retested). Among the 318 remaining patients, overall concordance with comparative microbiology methods was 88% (280/318): 131 samples were negative with both BF-JI and culture, and 149 samples were positive with the same microorganisms using complementary techniques. In 33 cases (10.4%), BF-JI was negative while culture was positive: 18 microorganisms were not targeted by BF-JI (including Staphylococcus epidermidis, n=10, and Cutibacterium acnes, n=2); 15 microorganisms targeted by BF-JI were obtained in culture but not by the molecular test (false-negative 4.7%). In 20 cases, BF-JI was positive while culture was not: 12 patients had received antibiotics before sampling, and 7 cases involved fragile and fastidious bacteria (Kingella kingae, n=5; Neisseria gonorrhoeae, n=2). In 6 cases, both BF-JI and culture were positive, but no yielding the same bacteria (polymicrobial specimens). Conclusions. In acute JIs, the BF-JI panel shows a good concordance with culture for the microorganisms targeted by the panel. Therefore, this molecular tool may have a place in microbiological diagnosis of acute JIs in order to confirm JI faster than culture. Moreover, it allows easy detection of difficult-to-culture bacteria. Acknowledgements. study was supported by bioMérieux, who provided all reagents

Aim. Treatment recommendations for periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) include surgical debridement, antibiotic therapy or staged revision. In surgical related foot and ankle infections (SR-FAI), implant removal will lead to instability. Debridement is difficult because the implant is outside the joint. Recommendations regarding PJI treatment can therefore not be extrapolated to the treatment of SR-FAI. Method. We searched PubMed for the etiology and treatment of SR-FAI, taken into account the time of occurrence, causative microorganisms and surgical treatment options. We integrated this knowledge into a treatment algorithm for SR-FAI. Results. Within the first 6 weeks after surgery, it is difficult to distinguish acute osteomyelitis from surgical site infection in which infection is limited to the soft tissue. The predominantly causative microorganism is Staphylococcus aureus. No debridement can be performed, because of the diffuse soft tissue inflammation and the absence of a joint space. If early SR- FAI is suspected without signs of systemic symptoms, fistula or abscess, empirical antibiotic treatment covering Staphylococcus aureus is recommended. If there is suspicion of ongoing SR-FAI after 2 weeks of empirical treatment, samples for culture after an antibiotic free window should be obtained to identify the causative microorganisms. If SR-FAI is confirmed, but there is no consolidation yet, targeted antibiotic treatment is given for 12 weeks without initial implant removal. In all other cases, debridement and samples for culture should be obtained after an antibiotic free window. Staged revision surgery will be performed if there is still a nonunion. Conclusions. Treatment algorithm regarding PJI cannot be extrapolated to the treatment of SR-FAI. Until now, no treatment guideline for SR-FAI is available. We have introduced a treatment algorithm for the treatment of SR-FAI. The guideline will be validated during the next 2 years

Aims. Achievement of accurate microbiological diagnosis prior to revision is key to reducing the high rates of persistent infection after revision knee surgery. The effect of change in the microorganism between the first- and second-stage revision of total knee arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) on the success of management is not clear. Methods. A two-centre retrospective cohort study was conducted to review the outcome of patients who have undergone two-stage revision for treatment of knee arthroplasty PJI, focusing specifically on isolated micro-organisms at both the first- and second-stage procedure. Patient demographics, medical, and orthopaedic history data, including postoperative outcomes and subsequent treatment, were obtained from the electronic records and medical notes. Results. The study cohort consisted of 84 patients, of whom 59.5% (n = 50) had successful eradication of their infection at a mean follow-up of 4.7 years. For the 34 patients who had recurrence of infection, 58.8% (n = 20) had a change in isolated organism, compared to 18% (n = 9) in the infection eradication group (p < 0.001). When adjusting for confound, there was no association when the growth on the second stage was the same as the first (odd ratio (OR) 2.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49 to 12.50; p = 0.269); however, when a different organism was identified at the second stage, this was independently associated with failure of treatment (OR 8.40, 95% CI 2.91 to 24.39; p < 0.001). There were no other significant differences between the two cohorts with regard to patient demographics or type of organisms isolated. Conclusion. Change in the identified microorganism between first- and second-stage revision for PJI was associated with failure of management. Identification of this change in the microorganism prior to commencement of the second stage may help target antibiotic management and could improve the success of surgery in these patients. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(9):720–727

Aims. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence the microbiological spectrum and clinical outcome of hip and knee revision arthroplasties with unexpected-positive-intraoperative-cultures (UPIC) at a single center with minimum follow up of 2 years. Methods. We retrospectively analyzed our prospectively maintained institutional arthroplasty registry. Between 2011 and 2020 we performed presumably aseptic rTHA (n=939) and rTKA (n= 1,058). Clinical outcome, re-revision rates and causes as well as the microbiological spectrum were evaluated. Results. In total, 219/939 (23.3%) rTHA and 114/ 1,058 (10.8%) rTKA had a UPIC (p<0.001). Single positive intraoperative cultures were found in 173/219 (78.9%) in rTHA and 99/114 (86.8%) in rTKA, whereas 46/219 (21.0%) rTHA and 15/114 (13.2%) rTKA had positive results in ≥2 intraoperative cultures. A total of 390 microorganisms were found among the 333 cases. Staphylococcus epidermidis 30.9%, CoNS (21.9%), Cutibacterium acnes 21.1%, and Bacillus spp. 7.3% were the most common microorganisms. Overall, detected microorganisms showed high sensitivity to daptomycin (96.6%), vancomycin (97.3%) and linezolid (98.0%). After a minimum follow up of 2 years (rTHA 1,470 (735; 3,738) days; rTKA 1,474 (749; 4,055) days). During the 2-year follow-up, 8 patients died and 5 were lost to follow-up. There were 54/219 (24.7%) re-revision in rTHa and 20/114 (17.5%) in rTKA. Overall, there were 23 (10.5%) septic re-rTHA and 9 (7.9%) septic re-rTKA as well as 31 (14.2%) aseptic re-rTHA and 11 (9.6%) aseptic re-rTKA. Patients with previous septic revisions bevor UPIC procedure showed a significant higher risk for septic re-revision (p<0.05). Moreover, there were less septic re-revisions after single culture positive UPIC (rTHA: 16/173 (9.2%); rTKA 6/99 (6.1%)) compared to ≥2 positive intraoperative cultures UPIC (rTHA: 7/46 (15.2%); rTKA 3/15 (20.0%)). The most common reason for re-revision in the rTHA-group was aseptic loosening of the cup (34.2%) or of the stem (23.3%), dislocation (18.3%) and periprosthetic-fractures (7.8%). In the rTKA-group it was aseptic loosening (40.4%), instability (24.6%) and secondary patella resurfacing (7.9%). There was a higher septic re-revision rate in consecutive revisions than in planned revisions 17.3% vs. 8.5% in the rTHA-group and 14.3% vs. 7.5% in the rTKA-group, p<0.001. Conclusion. UPICs are common in rTJA. The rate was higher in hips which may partly explained by the easier pre op joint aspiration in the knee. UPIC may lead to an increase in subsequent re-revisions

Aims. Microbiological culture is a key element in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, cultures of periprosthetic tissue do not have optimal sensitivity. One of the main reasons for this is that microorganisms are not released from the tissues, either due to biofilm formation or intracellular persistence. This study aimed to optimize tissue pretreatment methods in order to improve detection of microorganisms. Methods. From December 2017 to September 2019, patients undergoing revision arthroplasty in a single centre due to PJI and aseptic failure (AF) were included, with demographic data and laboratory test results recorded prospectively. Periprosthetic tissue samples were collected intraoperatively and assigned to tissue-mechanical homogenization (T-MH), tissue-manual milling (T-MM), tissue-dithiothreitol (T-DTT) treatment, tissue-sonication (T-S), and tissue-direct culture (T-D). The yield of the microbial cultures was then analyzed. Results. A total of 46 patients were enrolled, including 28 patients in the PJI group and 18 patients in the AF group. In the PJI group, 23 cases had positive culture results via T-MH, 22 cases via T-DTT, 20 cases via T-S, 15 cases via T-MM, and 13 cases via T-D. Three cases under ongoing antibiotic treatment remained culture-negative. Five tissue samples provided the optimal yield. Any ongoing antibiotic treatment had a relevant influence on culture sensitivity, except for T-DTT. Conclusion. T-MH had the highest sensitivity. Combining T-MH with T-DTT, which requires no special equipment, may effectively improve bacterial detection in PJI. A total of five periprosthetic tissue biopsies should be sampled in revision arthroplasty for optimal detection of PJI. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(2):96–104

Aim. The purpose of this study is to analyze the demographic and microbiological variables of acute ankle infections posterior to ankle osteosynthesis and to determine the different characteristics of patients withE. cloacae infection. Method. A multicenter retrospective observational study (4 national hospitals) of acute post osteosynthesis infections of ankle fracture operated between 2015 and 2018 was implemented. The demographic and microbiological variables relating to the surgical intervention and the antibiotic treatment performed were collected. A descriptive assessment of all the variables and a univariate comparison between patients with E. cloacae infection and patients with alternative microorganism infections were performed. The SPSS v25 program for Windows was the choice for statistical analysis. Results. 71 Patients with an average age of 57 years were included, the majority being males (55%). 31% of patients were diabetic, 27% had vascular pathology, and 18.3% had a BMI greater than 35. Trimalleolar fracture was the most common in our study being 52%. 26.8% were open fractures. The microorganisms isolated were: 25% S. aureus, 22.5% E. cloacae and 22.5% polymicrobial. Accounting for polymicrobial infections, the presence of E. cloacae rises to 32%. In the univariate analysis, only significant differences were found in age (patients with E. cloacae infection were older) and the use of VAC therapy. Conclusions. In our series, higher percentages of E. cloacae infection were observed than those described in the literature. There are statistically significant differences in the variables of age and need for VAC therapy. The high incidence of E. cloacae infections suggests the vital importance of adapting antibiotic prophylaxis, ensuring the coverage of this microorganism

Aim. Our aim was to evaluate the prevalence and impact of unexpected intraoperative cultures on the outcome of total presumed aseptic knee and hip revision surgery. Method. Data regarding patients prospectively recruited in our center, who had undergone elective complete hip and knee revision surgery from January 2003 to July 2017 with a preoperative diagnosis of aseptic loosening was retrospectively reviewed. Partial revisions and patients with follow up below 60 months were excluded from the study. The protocol of revision included at least 3 intraoperative cultures. Failure was defined as the need for re-revision due to any-cause at 5 years and/or the need for antibiotic suppressive therapy. Results. A total of 608 cases were initially included in the study, 53 patients were excluded. 123 hip and 432 knee revision surgeries were included. 420 cases (75.7%) had all cultures negative, 114 (20.5%) a single positive culture or two of different microorganisms and 21 (3.8%) had at least 2 positive cultures for the same microorganism. Early failure was found in 4.8% (1/21) of the patients with missed low grade infection. The presence of positive cultures during total exchange was not associated with a higher failure rate than in those with negative cultures (44 of 420, 10.5%). In contrast, patients revised before 24 months had a significant higher rate of re-revision, 18% (15/83) vs. 8.4%. Conclusions. Total hip and knee revisions with unexpected positive cultures were not significantly associated with a higher re-revision risk at 5 years of follow-up. Representing an overall good prognosis. However, revision surgeries performed within the first 24 months have a higher rate of failure

Aim. Prompt recognition and identification of the causative microorganism in acute septic arthritis of native and prosthetic joints is vital to increase the chances of successful treatment. The aim of this study was to independently assess the diagnostic accuracy of the multiplex BIOFIRE® Joint Infection (JI) Panel (investigational use only) in synovial fluid for rapid diagnosis. Method. Synovial fluid samples were prospectively collected at the University Medical Center Groningen from patients who had a clinical suspicion of a native septic arthritis, early acute (post-operative, within 3 months after arthroplasty) periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) or late acute (hematogenous) PJI. JI Panel results were compared to culture-based methods as reference standard. Results. A total of 45 samples were analyzed. The BIOFIRE JI Panel showed a high specificity (100%, 95% CI 73 – 100) and positive predictive value (100%, 95% CI 79 – 100) in all patient categories. Sensitivity and negative predictive value were 83% (95% CI 36 – 99) and 88% (95% CI 47 – 99) respectively for patients with a clinical suspicion of native septic arthritis (n=12), 77% (95% CI: 46 – 94) and 63% (95% CI: 26 – 90) for patients with a clinical suspicion of a late acute PJI (n=14), and 27% (95% CI 7 – 61) and 27% (95% CI: 7 – 61) for patients with a clinical suspicion of an early acute PJI (n=19). Conclusions. The results of this pilot study indicate a clear clinical benefit of the BIOFIRE JI Panel in patients with a suspected native septic arthritis and late acute (hematogenous) PJI, but a low clinical benefit in patients with an early acute (post-operative) PJI due to the absence of low-grade microorganisms in the panel

Aim. The treatment of fracture-related infections (FRI) focuses on obtaining fracture healing and eradicating infection to prevent osteomyelitis. Treatment guidelines include removal, exchange, or retention of the implants used according to the stability of the fracture and the time from the infection. Infection of a fracture in the process of healing with a stable fixation may be treated with implant retention, debridement, and antibiotics. Nonetheless, the retention of an intramedullary nail is a potential risk factor for failure, and it is recommended to exchange or remove the nail. This surgical approach implies additional life-threatening risks in elderly fragile hip fracture patients. Our study aimed to analyze the results of implant retention for the treatment of infected nails in elderly hip fracture patients. Methods. Our retrospective analysis included patients 65 years of age or older with an acute fracture-related infection treated with implant retention from 2012 to 2020 in 6 Spanish hospitals with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Patients that required open reduction during the initial fracture surgery were excluded. Variables included in our analysis were patient demographics, type of fracture, date of FRI diagnosis, causative microorganism, and outcome. Treatment success was defined as fracture healing with infection eradication without the need for further hospitalization. Results. A total of 48 patients were identified. Eight patients with open reduction were excluded and 11 did not complete a 1-year follow-up. Out of the 29 remaining patients, the mean age was 81.5 years, with a 21:9, female to male ratio. FRI was diagnosed between 10 and 48 days after initial surgery (mean 26 days). Treatment success was achieved in 24 patients (82.7%). Failure was objectivated in polymicrobial infections or infections caused by microorganisms resistant to antibiofilm antibiotics. Seven patients required more than one debridement with a success rate of 57%. Twelve patients had an infection diagnosed after 21 days from the initial surgery and implant retention was successful in all of them. Conclusion. Our results suggest implant retention is a valid therapeutic approach for fracture-related infection in elderly hip fracture patients treated by closed reduction and intramedullary nailing

Aim. Analysis of microbiological spectrum and resistance patterns as well as the clinical outcome of patients who underwent a Debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) procedure in the early phase following failed two-stage exchange arthroplasty of the knee and hip. Method. Of 312 patients treated with two-stage exchange arthroplasty between January 2011 and December 2019, 16 (5.1%) patients (9 knee, 7 hip) underwent a DAIR procedure within 6 months following second stage. We retrospectively analyzed the microbiological results as well as changes in the microbiological spectrum and antibiotic resistance patterns between stages of two-stage exchange arthroplasties and DAIR procedures. Patient's re-revision rates after a minimum follow-up of 12 months following DAIR procedure were evaluated. Moreover, differences between knee and hip and between infected primary total joint replacement (TJRs) and infected revision TJRs as well as patient's host factors and microbiological results regarding the outcome of DAIR were analyzed. Results. In 7/16 (43.8%) patients the first and second stage procedure was culture positive, in 5/16 (31.2%) patients the first and second stage procedure was culture negative and in 4/16 (25%) patients the first stage procedure was culture positive, and the second stage procedure was culture negative. Moreover, 6 (37.5%) out of 16 DAIR procedures showed a positive microbiological result. In 5/7 (71.4%) patients with culture positive second stage procedure a different microorganism compared to first stage procedure was detected. In 6/6 (100%) patients with culture positive DAIR procedure, the isolated microorganisms were not detected during first or second stage procedure. An additional re-revision surgery was necessary in 4/16 (25%) patients after a median time of 31 months (range, 12 to 138 months) at a mean follow up of 63.1 ± 32 months following DAIR procedure. Highest re-revision rates were found in patients with culture positive second stage procedures (3/7 [42.9%]) and patients with culture positive DAIR procedures (2/6 [33.3%]). Conclusions. DAIR procedure seems to be a useful early treatment option following failed two-stage exchange arthroplasty. The re-revision rates were independent of different combinations of culture positive and culture negative first and second stage procedures. The high number of changes in the microbiological spectrum needs to be considered in the treatment of PJI