Abstract. Objectives. Ankle fractures have an incidence of around 90,000 per year in the United Kingdom. They affect younger patients following high energy trauma and, in the elderly, following low energy falls. Younger patients with pre-existing comorbidities including raised BMI or poor bone quality are also at risk of these injuries which impact the bony architecture of the joint and the soft tissues leading to a highly unstable fracture pattern, resulting in dislocation. At present, there is no literature exploring what effect ankle fracture-dislocations have on patients’ quality of life and activities of daily living, with only ankle fractures being explored. Methods. Relevant question formatting was utilised to generate a focused search. This was limited to studies specifically mentioning ankle injuries with a focus on ankle fracture-dislocations. The number of patients, fracture-dislocation type, length of follow up, prognostic factors, complications and outcome measures were recorded. Results. 939 fractures were included within the studies. Eight studies looked at previously validated foot and ankle scores, two primarily focused on the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score (AOFAS), three on the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), and one study on the Olerud–Molander Score (OMAS). Patient, injury, and management factors were identified as being associated with poorer clinical outcomes. Conclusions. Not only are age and BMI a risk factor for posttraumatic osteoarthritis but they were also identified as prognostic indicators for functional outcome in this review. Patients sustaining a concurrent fracture-dislocation were found to have poorer clinical outcomes, and the timing and success of reduction further influenced outcomes. This review found that the quality of reduction was directly related to the patients’ functional outcomes post-follow up, and the risk of developing posttraumatic osteoarthritis, which was more frequent in patients sustaining Bosworth fractures, posterior malleolar fractures, and in patients over 35 years old

Retrospective review of eighteen patients with sacral fracture dislocations and cauda equina deficits treated with posterior sacral decompression and lumbopelvic fixation. At mean nineteen-month follow-up, all fractures healed without loss of alignment despite immediate full weight-bearing. Fifteen patients (83%) improved neurologically, and ten patients (56%) had full bowel/ bladder recovery. Complications consisted mainly of infection (17%) and asymptomatic rod breakage (33%). This series demonstrates the clinical effectiveness of lumbopelvic fixation, allowing the application to sacral injuries of decompression and fixation principles commonly used in fractures with neurologic deficits that occur in more rostral areas of the spine. To evaluate the results of sacral decompression and lumbopelvic fixation for sacral fracture-dislocations with neurologic deficits. Lumbopelvic fixation provided the stability necessary for full weight-bearing without loss of fracture reduction despite extensive sacral decompression. The functional neurologic improvement in most patients and complete neurologic recovery in all but one patient with intact lumbosacral roots are encouraging. The effectiveness of lumbopelvic fixation facilitates the application of principles of early decompression and stabilization to sacral fracture-dislocations. Sacral fractures healed in all eighteen patients without loss of reduction. Average sacral kyphosis improved from forty-one to twenty-four degrees. Fifteen patients (83%) had normalization or improvement of bowel and bladder deficits, although only ten patients (56%) had improved Gibbons scores. Average Gibbons type improved from four to 2.8 at nineteen-month average follow-up. Rod breakage (33%) and infection (17%) were the most common complications. Recovery of bowel and bladder function was less likely in patients with disruption of any lumbosacral root (36% vs. 86%, p=.066) and complete deficits (47% vs. 100%, p=.241) although the small cohort size precluded statistical significance. Retrospective review of medical records, radiographs, and prospectively collected data of eighteen consecutive patients with sacral fracture-dislocations and cauda equina deficits identified between 1997 and 2002 through institutional databases. Treatment consisted of open reduction, sacral decompression and lumbopelvic fixation. Radiographic and clinical results of treatment were evaluated. Neurologic outcome was measured by Gibbons’ criteria. Please contact author for figures and diagrams

Aim: Displaced intrarticular fractures and fracture-dislocations of the proximal humerus usually need operative treatment. The results of shoulder hemiartroplasty for the treatment of neglected fractures and fracture-dislocations are presented. Material – Method: 9 shoulder hemiartroplasties with modular head was used for the treatment of 5 neglected comminuted fractures and 4 fracture-dislocations of the proximal humerus. They were 5 females and 4 males with a mean age of 58 years, which were followed-up for a mean period of 4 years. The time between the injury and the operation varied from 2 to 8 months. The main indications was pain, loss of shoulder movement in relatively young patients. The tuberosities were found and extensively mobilized. The prosthesis was inserted with cement and the tuberosities were reattached to the shaft. Results: Main follow up was 4 years (2–8). The results were assessed according the modified UCLA score and were found excellent in 2, satisfactory in 4 and poor in z cases. Pain has improved in 7 cases and the mean postoperative elevation was 90? (20?–130?). External and internal rotation was significally improved. 5 patients presented satisfactory muscle strength and were able to perform satisfyingly the daily activities. Constant score rated from 50 to 80. The presence of a dislocation did not affect the final outcome. On the contrary the displacement of the tuberosities was decisive, and it was combined with greater scaring of the soft tissues and greater loss of motion. One patient developed transient palsy of the axillary nerve and another aseptic loosening of the prosthesis 7 years postoperatively. Conclusions: The success of the hemiartroplasty is based on the proper patient selection, the good operative technique and the meticulous postoperative rehabilitation. The retroversion, the height of the prosthesis and the correct balance of the soft tissues are of critical importance in the achievement of a good postoperative result. The tissue scaring, the tuberosities displacement and the rotator cuff lesions create such conditions that place these patients in the limited goal group, as introduced by Neer. The results of this group are considerably inferior to those treated soon after the injury. For this reason if indicated the prosthesis should be used at the first stage and not after the failure of the conservative treatment

Background: Complex anterior fracture-dislocations of shoulder are rare injuries and little is known about the functional outcomes following operative treatment. The aim of our study was to evaluate the functional outcomes following open reduction and internal fixation for these injuries. Methods: Over a ten and a half year period, we studied thirty-two consecutive patients who presented to shoulder injury clinic at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh with an acute Type-I complex anterior fracture-dislocation of the shoulder. The average age of the 19 men and 13 women was 58 years (range 21–81 years). All patients were treated with open reduction and internal fixation and were followed up for at least two years. The functional outcomes were assessed by three scoring systems (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire, the Constant questionnaire, and the Short Form-36 general health questionnaire). Results: At two years post injury, the median DASH score was 26 points and the median Constant score was 83.5 points. The range of motion of the shoulder joint showed significant improvement throughout the two year period and degree of forward flexion and abduction continued to show significant improvement at five years. At two years, the mean forward flexion was 162°, mean extension was 152°, mean internal rotation was 109° and mean external rotation was 73°. All but one patient returned to their job at two years. Conclusions: Type I complex anterior fracture-dislocations of the shoulder are rare and occur in the middle age and elderly group of population. Following open reduction and internal fixation, the functional outcomes have been shown to be satisfactory. We recommend that open reduction and internal fixation should be the first choice of treatment in Type-I complex anterior fracture-dislocation of shoulder

A particular pattern of complex instability of the elbow is “the terrible triad”, in which elbow dislocation is associated with fractures of the coronoid and radial head. Other frequent patterns are the variant of Monteggia lesions (Bado II) described by Jupiter which is characterized by ulnar fracture associated with fracture-dislocation of proximal radius, and the articular fracture of the distal humerus associated with elbow dislocation. The goal of treatment is to restore the primary stabilizers of the elbow such as the coronoid process, olecranon and both collateral ligaments by internal fixation and reconstruction of the ligaments. If elbow stability obtained at operation is unsatisfactory or internal fixation not enough stable, there an indication for applying a dynamic external fixator (DEF). The latter allows:. the articular congruence to be maintained and the ligaments to heal in adequate tension and position,. internal fixation and ligaments reconstruction to be protected, and. immediate joint motion to be carried out. From 2005 to 2008, we treated surgically 31 patients with complex instability of the elbow. DEF was applied in 38% of cases, namely 3 terrible triads, 5 fracture-dislocations of Monteggia and 4 articular fractures of the humerus associated with elbow dislocation. The mean age of patients was 44 years (range 30–74). All patients underwent ORIF, reconstruction of ligaments and dynamic external fixation. The OptiROM elbow fixator was used In 2 patients, the Orthofix fixator in 1 and the DJD fixator in 9. In all cases, active elbow motion was allowed without restrictions from the second postoperative day. Indomethacin was consistently administered for 5 weeks to prevent heterotopic ossifications. The DEF was removed after 6 weeks. The mean follow-up was 25 months (range 5–44 months). At last follow-up, the clinical results, evaluated according to the MEPS, were excellent in 10 patients (83%), who had had a fast recovery of range of motion (ROM). The elbow was painless in all patients and stable in all but 1. Moderate osteoarthrosis was found in 60% of cases. Complications included: 1 elbow stiffness, 1 pseudarthrosis of capitulum humeri and trochlea, 1 transitory radial nerve palsy, and 1 superficial pin tract infection. In conclusion, DEF is a helpful tool for treatment of complex elbow instability, particularly when stable internal fixation cannot be obtained or instability persists after ligaments reconstruction. However, DEF increases morbidity, and implies a longer operative time and prolonged exposure to radiation

Ten patients, who underwent treatment for complex fracture-dislocation of the proximal interphalangeal joint of finger and one patient for that of the interphalangeal joint of thumb with a modified pins and rubbers traction system, were reviewed to evaluate the clinical and functional results. Two patients had open fracture-dislocation, 5 had pilon fractures and 4 had fracture-dislocations. The system was modified to avoid rotation of the pins in the bone during joint mobilization, thus minimizing the risk of osteolysis due to friction of pins over the bone. Michigan hand scoring system was used for subjective assessment and range of motion at proximal and distal interphalangeal joints and grip strength for objective assessment. Average follow-up was 18 months (range 3 months to 28 months). The average normalised Michigan hand score was 86. Based on Michigan scores, overall hand function was rated excellent in 8 patients, good in 2 and poor in 1. Eight patients have returned to their original jobs. The average arc of flexion in the proximal interphalangeal joint was 85 degrees and in the distal interphalangeal joint it was 47 degrees. The average grip strength was 95 percent of the uninvolved side. Two patients developed minor pin site infection, which did not necessitate pin removal or any alteration in the treatment regime. There have been no cases of osteolysis, osteitis or osteomyelitis. This modification of pins and rubbers traction system has given very acceptable results with a low complication rate. It is light, cheap, effective and easy to apply

Easier patient positioning and less extensive soft tissue dissection have spurred a trend for anterior instrumentation and fusion for C-spine fracture/ dislocations. We present group of forty-six patients treated over an eighteen month period with an anterior approach. There were no permanent approach related complications, infections, hardware failures or graft displacements. One patient had worsened post-operative neurological findings. One patient required additional posterior stabilization for a missed injury. Two patients were not reducible from the front and required posterior reduction and stabilization followed by anterior instrumentation and fusion. All grafts healed within four months of the operation.

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of anterior instrumentation and fusion for Cervical Spine fracture/ dislocations

Over an eighteen month period, forty-six out of fifty-two patients with C-spine injuries requiring surgical treatment were followed prospectively. All patients underwent anterior approaches to stabilize and fuse the unstable segments using tricortical bone grafting and application of an anterior plate (CSLP, Synthes). Thirty-eight patients had single level injuries treated with discectomy and fusion. Two patients had two level discecomies. Six patients underwent corpectomy and fusions for fractures of the vertebral bodies

There were no approach related complications such as recurrent laryngeal nerve injuries, oesophageal perforations, vascular injuries or strokes. One patient deteriorated neurologically. All other patients either improved neurologically or remained with their original findings. Two patients required oral antibiotics for superficial infections at the donor site. There were no spine infections, hardware loosening or graft extrusions. All bone grafts healed within four months both clinically and radiologically. Forty-one patients complained of minor or no pain after four months. Five patients continued to have moderate discomfort. One of these patients had a missed injury above his two-level fusion with gradual progression into kyphosis requiring posterior stabilization.

Halo vest immobilization and posterior stabilization for C-spine fracture /dislocations have been the treatment of choice for many surgeons. The low complication and failure rate has spurred on a gradual change towards anterior instrumentation and fusion. Our study very strongly supports this trend. We see little indication for the more invasive posterior approach given our present results.

29 cases of complex elbow injuries were reviewed at a mean period of 15 months. Outcome measures included MEPS and DASH score. Patients who had defined early surgery were significantly better than those in whom surgery was delayed. We concluded that Management of complex elbow injuries can be improved by early definitive surgery. The magnitude and type of soft tissue injuries should be identified. MRI scans should be liberally used for this purpose. We believe that early, adequate and appropriate management of soft tissue injuries including use of articulated external fixator for early mobilisation improves the outcome of complex elbow injuries.

Purpose: To describe the pattern of injury, surgical technique and outcomes of Monteggia type IID fracture dislocations.

Method: Design: Retrospective review of prospectively collected clinical and radiographic patient data in orthopaedic trauma database with prospectively collected outcome scores. Setting: Level 1 university based trauma center. Patients / Participants: All patients with Monteggia type IID fracture dislocations admitted from January 2000 to July 2005. Intervention: Review of patient demographics, fracture pattern, method of fixation, complications, additional surgical procedures, and clinical and radiographic outcome measures. Main Outcome Measurements: Clinical outcomes: elbow range of motion, QuickDASH (Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand), PREE (Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation), complications. Radiographic outcomes: quality of fracture reduction, healing time, degenerative change and heterotopic ossification.

Results: Sixteen patients were included in the study. All fractures united. There were seven complications in 6 patients including 3 contractures with associated heterotopic ossification, 1 pronator syndrome and late radial nerve palsy, 1 radial head collapse and a DVT in the same patient and 1 with prominent hardware. Outcome scores were obtained on 11 patients at an average of 49 months (range 25 – 82 months) post-operatively. The average Quickdash score was 11 (range 0–43) and the average PREE score was 13 (range 0–34).

Conclusion: Monteggia IID fracture dislocations are complex injuries with a recurring pattern. Rigid anatomic fixation, early range of motion and avoidance of complications leads to a good outcome.

Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a well-known complication of traumatic elbow injuries. The reported rates of post-traumatic HO formation vary from less than 5% with simple elbow dislocations, to greater than 50% in complex fracture-dislocations. Previous studies have identified fracture-dislocations, delayed surgical intervention, and terrible triad injuries as risk factors for HO formation. There is, however, a paucity of literature regarding the accuracy of diagnosing post-traumatic elbow HO. Therefore, the purpose of our study was to determine the inter-rater reliability of HO diagnosis using standard radiographs of the elbow at 52 weeks post-injury, as well as to report on the rate of mature compared with immature HO. We hypothesized inter-rater reliability would be poor among raters for HO formation. Prospectively collected data from a large clinical trial was reviewed by three independent reviewers (one senior orthopedic resident, one senior radiology resident, and one expert upper extremity orthopedic surgeon). Each reviewer examined anonymized 52-week post-injury radiographs of the elbow and recorded: 1. the presence or absence of HO, 2. the location of HO, 3. the size of the HO (in cm, if present), and 4. the maturity of the HO formation. Maturity was defined by consensus prior to image review and defined as an area of well-defined cortical and medullary bone outside the cortical borders of the humerus, ulna, or radius. Immature lesions were defined as an area of punctate calcification with an ill-defined cloud-like density outside the cortical borders of the humerus, ulna or radius. Data were collected using a standardized online data collection form (CognizantMD, Toronto, ON, CA). Inter-rater reliability was calculated using Fleiss’ Kappa statistic and a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for HO formation in general, as well as mature HO at 52 weeks post injury. Statistical analysis was performed using RStudio (version1.4, RStudio, Boston, MA, USA). A total of 79 radiographs at the 52-week follow-up were reviewed (54% male, mean age 50, age SD 14, 52% operatively treated). Inter-rater reliability using Fleiss’ Kappa was k= 0.571 (p = 0.0004) indicating moderate inter-rater reliability among the three reviewers. The rate of immature HO at 52 weeks was 56%. The multivariate logistic regression analysis identified male sex as a significant risk factor for HO development (OR 5.29, 1.55-20.59 CI, p = 0.011), but not for HO maturity at 52 weeks. Age, time to surgery, and operative intervention were not found to be significant predictors for either HO formation or maturity of the lesion in this cohort. Our study demonstrates moderate inter-rater reliability in determining the presence of HO at 52 weeks post-elbow injury. There was a high rate (56%) of immature HO at 52-week follow-up. We also report the finding of male sex as a significant risk factor for post traumatic HO development. Future research directions could include investigation into possible male predominance for traumatic HO formation, as well as improving inter-rater reliability through developing a standardized and validated classification system for reporting the radiographic features of HO formation around the elbow

Background. Undisplaced Lisfranc-type injuries are subtle but potentially unstable fracture-dislocations with little known about the natural history. These injuries are often initially managed conservatively due to lack of initial displacement and uncertainty regarding subsequent instability at the tarsometatarsal joints (TMTJ). The aim of this study was to determine the secondary displacement rate and the need for delayed operative intervention in undisplaced Lisfranc injuries that were managed conservatively at initial presentation. Methods. Over a 6-year period (2011 to 2017), we identified 24 consecutive patients presenting to a university teaching hospital with a diagnosis of an undisplaced Lisfranc-type injury that was initially managed conservatively. Pre-operative radiographs were reviewed to confirm the undisplaced nature of the injury (defined as a diastasis< 2mm at the second TMTJ). The presence of a ‘fleck’ sign (small bony avulsion of the second metatarsal) was also noted. Electronic patient records and sequential imaging (plain radiographs/CT/MRI) were scrutinized for demographics, mechanism of injury and eventual outcome. Results. The mean age of the patients at the time of injury was 42 years (19 Female). 96% (23/24) were low energy injuries and 88% (21/24) had a positive ‘fleck sign’. The secondary displacement rate in this group of patients was 62.5% (15/24) over a median interval of 14 days (range 0 to 482 days). 12 patients underwent open reduction internal fixation after a median interval of 29 days (range 1 to 294 days) from their initial injury. One patient required TMTJ fusion at 19 months and two patients were managed non-operatively. The injury remained undisplaced in 37.5% patients (9/24) with only one patient requiring subsequent TMTJ fusion at 5 months. Conclusion. Undisplaced Lisfranc injuries have a high rate of secondary displacement and warrant close follow-up. Early primary stabilisation of undisplaced Lisfranc injuries should be considered to prevent unnecessary delays in surgical treatment

Optimal surgical management of proximal humeral fractures remains controversial. We report our experience and the study on our surgical technique for proximal humeral fractures and fracture-dislocations using locking plates in conjunction with calcium sulphate augmentation and tuberosity repair using high strength sutures. We used the extended deltoid-splitting approach for fracture patterns involving displacement of both lesser and greater tuberosities and for fracture-dislocations. We retrospectively analysed 22 proximal humeral fractures in 21 patients. 10 were male and 11 female with an average age of 64.6 years (Range 37 to 77). Average follow-up was 24 months. Fractures were classified according to Neer and Hertel systems. Pre-operative radiographs and CT scans in three and four-part fractures were done to assess the displacement and medial calcar length for predicting the humeral head vascularity. According to the Neer classification, there were 5 two-part, 6 three-part, 5 four-part fractures and 6 fracture-dislocations (2 anterior and 4 posterior). Results were assessed clinically with DASH scores, modified Constant & Murley scores and serial post-operative radiographs. The mean DASH score was 16.18 and modified Constant & Murley score was 64.04 at the last follow-up. 18 out of 22 cases achieved good clinical outcome. All the fractures united with no evidence of infection, failure of fixation, malunion, tuberosity failure, avascular necrosis or adverse reaction to calcium sulphate bone substitute. There was no evidence of axillary nerve injury. The CaSO4 bone substitute was replaced by normal appearing trabecular bone texture at an average of 6 months in all patients

Introduction Sacral fracture-dislocations with cauda equina deficits are high-energy injuries, the treatment of which is controversial. The effect of early decompression and stabilization is unclear. Neurologic recovery has not been objectively evaluated in past series, putting into question reported recovery rates. Sacral anatomic constraints make standard principles of fracture reduction, neural decompression and stable fixation difficult to apply. Lumbo-pelvic fixation allows indirect fracture stabilization by transferring loads directly from the acetabulum to the lumbar spine, thus avoiding the difficulties inherent in achieving sacral fixation. The purpose of this study was to determine the results of sacral decompression and lumbo-pelvic fixation for sacral fracture-dislocations, with neurologic deficits, using an objective method to evaluate neurologic recovery. Methods We have carried out a complete retrospective review of all medical records, original radiographs, and prospectively collected data of 18 consecutive patients with sacral fracture-dislocations and cauda equina deficits identified between 1997 and 2002 through institutional spine and trauma databases. Fractures were classified according to Denis (1), Roy-Camille (2) and Strange-Vognsen (3). All were treated with open reduction, sacral decompression and lumbopelvic fixation. Radiographic and clinical results of treatment were evaluated. Neurologic outcome was measured by Gibbons’ criteria (4). Results Sacral fractures healed in all 18 patients without loss of reduction. Average sacral kyphosis improved from 41° to 24°. Fifteen patients (83%) had normalization or improvement of bowel and bladder deficits, although only 10 patients (56%) had improved Gibbons scores. Average Gibbons type improved from four to 2.8 at 19 month average follow-up. Rod breakage (33%) and infection (17%) were the most common complications. Recovery of bowel and bladder function was more likely in patients with intact lumbosacral roots (86% vs. 36%,p=.066) and incomplete deficits (100% vs. 47%, p=.241) although the small cohort size precluded statistical significance. Conclusions Lumbo-pelvic fixation safely and effectively provided the stability necessary for mobilization and weight-bearing without loss of reduction in polytraumatized, neurologically impaired patients undergoing extensive sacral decompression. Although neurologic improvement was noted in 83% of patients only 56% of patients had measurable recovery according to objective criteria. However, the functional improvement noted in most patients and complete recovery of bowel and bladder function in all but one patient with intact sacral roots are encouraging

Distal radius fractures are among the most common fractures seen in the emergency department. Closed reduction can provide definitive management when acceptable radiographic parameters are met. Repeated attempts of closed reduction are often performed to improve the alignment and avoid operative management. However, multiple reduction attempts may worsen dorsal comminution and lead to eventual loss of reduction, resulting in no demonstrable benefit. We hypothesize that compared to one closed reduction attempt, repeated closed reduction of extra-articular, dorsally angulated, displaced distal radius fractures has a low success rate in the prevention of operative fixation and improvement of radiographic parameters. Initial and post reduction radiographs for all distal radius fractures managed at Vancouver General Hospital between 2015 and 2018 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were based on the AO fracture classification and included types 23-A2.1, 23-A2.2 and 23-A3. Exclusion criteria included age less than 18, intra-articular involvement with more than two millimeters of displacement, volar or dorsal Barton fractures, fracture-dislocations, open fractures and volar angulation of the distal segment. Distal radius fractures that met study criteria and underwent two or more attempts of closed reduction were matched by age and gender with fractures that underwent one closed reduction. Radiographic parameters including radial height and inclination, ulnar variance and volar tilt were compared between groups. Sixty-eight distal radius fractures that met study criteria and underwent multiple closed reduction attempts were identified. A repeated closed reduction initially improved the radial height (p = 0.03) and volar tilt (p < 0.001). However, by six to eight weeks the improvement in radial height had been lost (p = 0.001). Comparison of radiographic parameters between the single reduction and multiple reduction groups revealed no difference in any of the radiographic parameters at one week of follow up. By six to eight weeks, the single reduction group had greater radial height (p = 0.01) ulnar variance (p = 0.05) and volar tilt (p = 0.02) compared to the multiple reduction group. With respect to definitive management, 38% of patients who underwent a repeated closed reduction subsequently received surgery, compared to 13% in the single reduction group (p = 0.001). Repeated closed reduction of extra-articular, dorsally angulated, displaced distal radius fractures did not improve alignment compared to a single closed reduction and was associated with increased frequency of surgical fixation. The benefit of repeating a closed reduction should be carefully considered when managing distal radius fractures of this nature

Distal radius fractures are among the most common fractures seen in the emergency department. Closed reduction can provide definitive management when acceptable radiographic parameters are met. Repeated attempts of closed reduction are often performed to improve the alignment and avoid operative management. However, multiple reduction attempts may worsen dorsal comminution and lead to eventual loss of reduction, resulting in no demonstrable benefit. We hypothesize that compared to one closed reduction attempt, repeated closed reduction of extra-articular, dorsally angulated, displaced distal radius fractures has a low success rate in the prevention of operative fixation and improvement of radiographic parameters. Initial and post reduction radiographs for all distal radius fractures managed at Vancouver General Hospital between 2015 and 2018 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were based on the AO fracture classification and included types 23-A2.1, 23-A2.2 and 23-A3. Exclusion criteria included age less than 18, intra-articular involvement with more than two millimeters of displacement, volar or dorsal Barton fractures, fracture-dislocations, open fractures and volar angulation of the distal segment. Distal radius fractures that met study criteria and underwent two or more attempts of closed reduction were matched by age and gender with fractures that underwent one closed reduction. Radiographic parameters including radial height and inclination, ulnar variance and volar tilt were compared between groups. Sixty-eight distal radius fractures that met study criteria and underwent multiple closed reduction attempts were identified. A repeated closed reduction initially improved the radial height (p = 0.03) and volar tilt (p < 0.001). However, by six to eight weeks the improvement in radial height had been lost (p = 0.001). Comparison of radiographic parameters between the single reduction and multiple reduction groups revealed no difference in any of the radiographic parameters at one week of follow up. By six to eight weeks, the single reduction group had greater radial height (p = 0.01) ulnar variance (p = 0.05) and volar tilt (p = 0.02) compared to the multiple reduction group. With respect to definitive management, 38% of patients who underwent a repeated closed reduction subsequently received surgery, compared to 13% in the single reduction group (p = 0.001). Repeated closed reduction of extra-articular, dorsally angulated, displaced distal radius fractures did not improve alignment compared to a single closed reduction and was associated with increased frequency of surgical fixation. The benefit of repeating a closed reduction should be carefully considered when managing distal radius fractures of this nature

In the past, the treatment of acute elbow fracture-dislocations has emphasized repair to the medial collateral ligament (MCL), with favorable results. We report improved results using a strategy based on lateral-sided repair (lateral collateral ligament, radial head, coronoid) without MCL repair. In forty-seven patients, this strategy resulted in a high degree of success with no residual instability (valgus or otherwise). The dynamic stabilizers of the elbow activated through early postoperative motion, are important adjunct to stability. We have devised a reproducible radiographic method to demonstrate this. To review the surgical treatment of elbow dislocations without surgical MCL repair, and to determine if early active motion aids in restoring stability and concentric joint reduction. In the setting of acute fracture-dislocation of the elbow, concentric elbow stability with excellent functional results can be achieved using laterally-based surgical strategy without MCL repair. The dynamic stabilizers of the elbow, activated through the early motion, assist in providing joint congruity and stability. Forty-seven patients with acute elbow fracture-dislocations requiring operative treatment were treated at two university-affiliated teaching hospitals and evaluated an average of twenty-one months after injury. The protocol consisted of repair of the ulna and coronoid, repair or replacement of the radial head, and repair of the LCL, and early motion. The MCL was not routinely repaired. The LCL origin had been avulsed and reattached in all patients. One patient had a second procedure related to malpositioned radial head prosthesis. A stable mobile (average one hundred and one degree arc) articulation was restored in all patients. There was no evidence of valgus instability in any patient. Early motion was initiated at a mean of two weeks postoperatively. Postoperative ulnohumeral joint space opening improved from 4.9 ± 1.2 mm in the early postoperative period to 2.0 ± 0.5 mm (p < 0.00003) at final follow-up. We believe this is due to the effect of the dynamic stabilizers, which were allowed to function through early motion

This paper highlights the fact that full length labral tears are a cause of instability in posterior fracture-dislocations of the hip. From July 1994 to March 2001, 133 consecutive posterior fracture-dislocations of the hip were surgically treated. On admission, all patients were initially subjected to closed reduction, and in some cases skeletal or skin traction was applied. Pelvic radiographs were taken to confirm relocation, and CT done to look for intra-articular bone fragments. Intra-operative findings and surgical technique were recorded. Redislocation occurred in eight patients, whose surgical notes were reviewed to determine the cause. Despite 9 kg of skeletal traction, one patients’s hip redislocated the day after closed reduction. In the other seven, redislocation occurred postoperatively. The time to redislocation varied from one day to 16 weeks, and because redislocation was sometimes painless, not all patients reported it immediately. Two patients, whose radiographs showed very small fragments at the superior-posterior position, would normally have been treated conservatively. On one, surgery was performed because the fragment was lodged at the weight-bearing area of the joint. The hip of the other redislocated on skeletal traction the day after closed reduction. At surgery, it was noted that both patients had extensive soft tissue stripping and full length tears of the labrum. The other six patients had clear posterior wall fractures requiring surgical reconstruction. The fragments were often attached to the capsule but were too small to fix with screws, so buttress plating was used alone. Full-length labral tears in posterior dislocations of the hip cause instability, and failure to address this adequately at surgery may result in redislocation

Purpose: Fracture-posterior dislocation of the femoral head is an exceptional hip injury. Emergency reduction is required. Relocation into the acetabular cavity of the displaced femoral head may not be feasible. Irreducibility, instability, and more rarely accidental fracture of the femoral neck may also occur. We encountered this latter complication in four patients and report here its frequency and mechanism and propose preventive therapeutic measures. Material and methods: Seventy dislocations and fracture-dislocations of the hip were treated in our unit from March 1997 to February 2003. Among these cases, fourteen hip dislocations were complicated by femoral head fractures. Fracture of the femoral neck occurred during reduction in four. All four cases occurred in men, mean age 49.7 years, who were traffic accident victims (drivers or passengers). There were two Pipkin IV fracture-dislocations and two Pipkin II. The first reduction, achieved under general anaesthesia in an emergency setting, was performed by an orthopaedic surgeon in one patient and a general surgeon in three patients. Arthroplasty was used to treat the femoral neck fracture in three patients and pinning in one. We reviewed retrospectively the clinical and imaging data before and after reduction. Results: Sub-capital fracture situated 4.0 cm (mean, range 3.5–4.5 cm) from the lesser trochanter occurred in all four cases. The head remained attached above and posteriorly to the acetabulum and was rotated less than 90°. The fragment remaining in the acetabulum was displaced in two cases. In one patient, the fracture-dislocation of the head was associated with a fracture of the posterior rim of the acetabulum. Discussion: Neck fracture during reduction of traumatic hip dislocation is a serious complication. Prevention of this iatrogenic event requires a slow, progressive reduction limiting the trauma to a minimum; first intention open surgery may be required in selected cases

The primary objective of this study was to determine if paediatric proximal humerus fractures undergo significant displacement resulting in change in management. A retrospective analysis was performed on children who presented with proximal humeral fractures to our institution between 2009 and 2014. Patients were included if they were diagnosed with a fracture of the proximal humerus in the absence of an underlying bone cyst or pathological condition. Patients with open fractures, multiple fractures, neurologic, or vascular injuries were excluded. The primary endpoint was conversion to operative treatment after initial non-operative management. Secondary endpoints were a healed fracture with acceptable alignment at the final radiographic evaluation, as well as the number of follow-up radiographs obtained after the initiation of non-operative management. A decision to manage the fracture operatively at the initial presentation was made in 14 out of 239 patients. Of the 225 patients that were initially managed non-operatively, only 1 patient underwent subsequent surgical management. In this series, no non-unions, re-fractures, nor fracture-dislocations were identified. These data support that the majority of management decisions for paediatric proximal humeral fractures are made at the initial presentation. Once non-operative management is chosen, routine follow-up imaging rarely leads to any change in treatment

Purpose. Limited information is available regarding the functional outcomes of radial head fractures managed with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). The purpose of this study was to determine the functional outcomes of radial head fractures treated with ORIF. Method. Fifty-two patients, with a mean age of 4412 years, who were treated with radial head ORIF were evaluated at a mean of 4.42.4 years. Thirty were isolated radial head fractures (Group A), 13 (Group B) were associated with a complex fracture-dislocation (terrible triad variants), and 5 (Group C) were associated with a proximal ulnar fracture (Monteggia/trans-olecranon variants). Fourty-four were partial articular fractures and 8 were complete articular fractures. Outcomes were assessed with physical and radiographic examination, and validated self-reported questionnaires. Results. The average PREE score (Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation) for Groups A, B, and C were 7.613.1, 12.313.4, and 108.5, respectively. The average MEPI (Mayo Elbow Performance Score) for Groups A, B, and C were 8913, 8511, and 918, respectively. For Groups A, B, and C respectively, the prevalence of radiographic radiocapitellar arthritis was 30%, 46%, and 20%. The average flexion/extension arc for Groups A, B, and C were 7 to 132, 6 to 134, and 10 to 132 respectively. Secondary surgery was performed in 17% of cases, most commonly for decreased motion. Three comminuted fractures failed ORIF and required conversion to radial head arthroplasty. Conclusion. Patients with radial head fractures, including those associated with complex fracture-dislocations, can achieve excellent functional outcomes with low self reported pain and disability when treated with ORIF, despite radiographic evidence of mild post-traumatic arthritis