Introduction. Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including pulmonary embolism (PE) resulting from deep vein thrombosis (DVT), remains a well-known serious complication after femoral fractures. The low molecular heparin is widely used to prevent VTE. This study compared the effectiveness of VTE prevention between dalteparin and enoxaparin. Materials and Methods. From 2013 to 2014, we retrospectively recruited 712 patients who had femoral fractures with operative treatment. All patients receiving VTE chemoprophylaxis with perioperative period using dalateparin in Group 1(N=395) and enoxaparin in Group 2(N=317). The prophylactic dosing was determined using individual product labeling and identified as enoxaparin 40 mg every 12 hours and dalteparin 2500 international unit (IU) once daily, based on clinical practice guidelines. The prophylaxis was started at admission, and maintained during average 8.43.5 days after operation. The outcome including the incidence of clinically significant deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, perioperative bleeding and cost of drugs were evaluated between two groups. Results. The two study groups did not differ significantly in fracture type, age, gender, ASA score. The overall incidence of VTE is similar between two groups. However, the incidence of fatal PE is significantly lower in patients with dalteparin (Group 1: 4/395(1.00%), Group 2: 10/317(3.15%), p<0.001). And the overall cost of each group is significantly different between two groups (Group 1: average KRW 89,426, Group 2: average KRW 32,188, p<0.001). Conclusion. Both dalteparin and enoxaparin could be safely used without notable complications in VTE prophylaxis. However, dalteparin had more advantages for prevention of fatal PE, compared to enoxaparin in patients with femoral fractures with significant cost effectiveness

Background: Prophylaxis against thromboembolic complications has become routine after major trauma and major orthopaedic surgery. In contrast, it remains an issue for debate whether prophylaxis after minor surgery and immobilization is necessary, even though these treatments are well-known risk factors for deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of Dalteparin (5,000 U given subcutaneously once daily for six weeks) during lower limb immobilization after surgical treatment of Achilles tendon rupture. Methods: After surgery, 105 consecutive patients were randomized to a placebo-controlled double-blind study to evaluate the efficacy of given thromboprophylaxis. DVT screening using validated color duplex sonography was performed three weeks and six weeks after surgery, and all DVTs were confirmed with phlebography. Results: Primary endpoint analysis was available for 91 patients. DVT was diagnosed in 16/47 patients (34%) in the Dalteparin group and in 16/44 patients (36%) in the placebo group. These figures are not significantly different (p=0.8). Proximal DVT was diagnosed in one patient (2%) in the Dalteparin group and in three patients (6%) in the placebo group (p=0.6). No pulmonary emboli or major bleeding occurred in either of the groups. Conclusions: DVT is common after surgical treatment of Achilles tendon rupture and therefore effective thromboprophylaxis is desirable. Thromboprophylaxis with Dalteparin however, does not affect the incidence of DVT during the immobilization after Achilles tendon rupture surgery. Long-term effects of immobilization, such as the risk for post-thrombotic syndrome, need to be investigated further

Aims. NICE recommends oral anticoagulants after lower limb arthroplasty, as they are thought to lead to better outpatient compliance than injected anticoagulants. Having prescribed self-administered Dalteparin for many years, we began using oral Dabigatran in December 2010. The change afforded an opportunity to compare compliance and acceptability of the two treatments. Methods. Patients were recruited at discharge and telephoned at 28 days. Left over doses were counted to assess compliance. Side-effects, complications and patient views were also recorded. Results. 47 patients were discharged on dalteparin, 59 on dabigatran. Total compliance rates were 81% and 56% respectively (p<0.001). However, the mean pain score associated with dalteparin was 2.4 out of 10, and 31% of patients experienced significant bruising. No patient suffered pain or bruising with dabigatran (p<0.001), but two experienced dyspepsia and four suffered wound problems. Two thromboembolic events and one gastrointestinal bleed occurred in the dalteparin group. Conclusions. Our outpatient compliance is higher for injected anticoagulants than for oral anticoagulants. This runs contrary to some of the marketing for oral agents. However, Dabigatran offers better patient acceptability than Dalteparin. While not designed or powered to show statistically significant differences in complication rates, our study has prompted closer investigation of wound problems with both treatments

Rivaroxiban is a factor Xa inhibitor and is a newer oral alternative for thromboprophylaxis after joint replacements. Its major advantage is its oral administration and hence better patient compliance. However there are some doubts about its efficacy compared to dalteparin/heparin. We have recently changed over from using dalteparin injections to rivaroxiban tablets for thromboprophylaxis after hip replacements. We assessed our results to find efficacy and specificity of its action in patients undergoing THR. 504 patients underwent hip replacement in last 2 years. 316 were treated with dalteparin injections (fragmin) for thromboprophylaxis while 189 patients were treated with oral rivaroxiban for 35 days after their hip replacement. Average haemoglobin drop at 24 hours postop was 2.79 in Rivaroxiban group compared to 3. 10 in dalteparin group. 19 patients (of 189 i.e. 10.05%) required postop blood transfusion in rivaroxiban group as against 60 (of 315 i.e. 19.04%) in Dalteparin group. This difference was statistically significant. Incidence of DVT was no different in either groups, but the number of patients was too small to compare this. Rivaroxiban appears to be more specific in its action and our results suggest a significant reduction in postop blood transfusion following hip replacements without any increase in rate of Deep Vein Thrombosis. We would like to present our findings and discuss role of oral thromboprophylaxis after joint replacements

Purpose: Among patients with isolated below-knee fractures, venography studies detect deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in 20 – 40%. The clinical relevance of these thrombi is unknown. We conducted the first randomized, double-blind, multicentre study designed to assess the effectiveness and safety of low molecular weight heparin compared to placebo in preventing CIVTE in patients with isolated fractures of the distal leg. Method: Consecutive patients with fractures of the tibia, fibula or ankle requiring surgery were randomized to dalteparin 5000 U or placebo once daily SC within 72 hours of fracture for 14 + 2 days. Patients were screened using proximal duplex ultrasound at day 14, and followed up at 6 wks and 3 mos. Clinically suspected VTE was investigated using standardized algorithms with central, blinded adjudication. Results: From August 2002 to October 2006, 134 patients were randomized to dalteparin and 131 to placebo. 98% of patients completed 3 mo follow-up. Overall, 5 patients had CIVTE (2 asymptomatic DVT, 2 symptomatic DVT, 1 nonfatal PE); 2 (1.5%) in the dalteparin arm and 3 (2.3%) on placebo (p=0.68). There were no major bleeds. Conclusion: The overall incidence of CIVTE after surgically-repaired, isolated tibia, fibula and ankle fractures was so low (1.9%; 95% CI 0.7 to 4.7%), with no observed differences between dalteparin and placebo either for CIVTE or safety, that recruitment was stopped early. This study also demonstrates the large discrepancy between trials that utilize venographic and CIVTE outcomes

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of dalteparin use on transfusion rates and blood loss in patients undergoing primary total joint arthroplasty at our center. We prospectively studied the transfusion patterns of 1642 patients who underwent primary total hip or knee arthroplasty between January 2004 and December 2005 by five arthroplasty surgeons. The influence of daltaperin use, release of tourniquet in total knee arthroplasty, and the turnover of house staff were analyzed using SPSS V14.0 statistical software. We identified seven hundred and three total hip and nine hundred and thirty-nine knee arthroplasty patients. The mean haemoglobin drop was statistically significant between 2004 and 2005 (p< 0.001). This was seen in both hip (p=0.014) and knee (p< 0.001) patients. Subgroup analysis of total knee arthroplasty revealed a significant difference in haemoglobin drop between surgeons who released the tourniquet prior to closure compared to release at the end of the case (p=0.005). In addition, there were significant monthly differences that corresponded with the turnover of house staff (p=0.039). Overall, no statistically significant increase in allogeneic transfusion rates was observed between years, months, and individual surgeons. The use of dalteparin was found to be associated with a significantly increased haemoglobin drop in primary total joint replacement when compared to warfarin. However, the use of dalteparin was not associated with an increase in allogeneic transfusions at our center. The results also suggest that there may be an advantage to releasing the tourniquet and achieving hemostasis prior to closure in knee arthroplasty. Finally, the results emphasise the importance of educating new house staff on methods to reduce intra-operative blood loss and transfusion rates

Ximelagatran is an oral direct thrombin inhibitor intended for the prophylaxis and treatment of thrombo-embolic complications. Purpose: The efficacy and safety of ximelagatran, and its subcutaneous (sc) form melagatran, were evaluated in patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement (THR, TKR). Study 1 was a randomised, double-blind, controlled, dose–response study in which patients received 2-6 doses of sc melagatran (1, 1.5, 2.25, or 3 mg bid) followed by oral ximelagatran (8, 12, 18, or 24 mg bid), or sc dalteparin (5000 IU od). Melagatran treatment was initiated immediately before surgery. Study 2 was a randomized, double-blind, controlled study in which patients received 1–5 doses of sc melagatran (3 mg bid) initiated 4–12 h after surgery followed by oral ximelagatran (24 mg bid), or sc enoxaparin (40 mg od). In both studies, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) was started the evening before surgery, and all treatment regimens were continued for 8–11 days. Bilateral venography was performed on the final day of treatment. Results: In Study 1, 1876 patients underwent THR (n=1270) or TKR (n=606). A significant dose-dependent reduction in venous thromboembolism (VTE) was seen with melagatran + ximelagatran for both THR (P< 0.0001) and TKR (P=0.0014). The rate of VTE was significantly lower with the highest dose of melagatran + ximelagatran (15.1%) when compared with dalteparin (28.2%) (P< 0.0001). In Study 2, 2788 patients underwent THR (n=1923) or TKR (n=865). The VTE rate was 31% in the melagatran + ximelagatran group and 27% in the enoxaparin group (P=0.053). Total bleeding volume was not significantly different between treatment groups. Conclusion: Fixed-dose sc melagatran followed by oral ximelagatran are efficacious and well tolerated for the prophylaxis of VTE following THR or TKR

Tranexamic Acid (TA) has been shown to reduce transfusion rates in Total Knee Replacement (TKR) without complication. In our unit it was added to our routine enhanced recovery protocol. No other changes were made to the protocol at this time and as such we sought to examine the effects of TA on wound complication and transfusion rate. All patients undergoing primary TKR over a 12 month period were identified. Notes and online records were reviewed to collate demographics, length of stay, use of TA, thromboprophylaxis, blood transfusion, wound complications and haemoglobin levels. All patients received a Columbus navigated TKR with a tourniquet. Only patients who received 14 days of Dalteparin for thromboprophylaxis were included. 124 patients were included, 72 receiving TA and 52 not. Mean age was 70. Four patients required a blood transfusion all of whom did not receive TA (p = 0.029). Mean change in Hb was 22 without TA and 21 with (p = 0.859). Mean length of stay was 6.83 days without Tranexamic Acid and 5.15 with (p < 0.001). 15% of patients (n=11) of the TA group had a wound complication, with 40% of patients (n=21) in the non TA group (p = 0.003). There was one ultrasound confirmed DVT (non TA group). No patients were diagnosed with pulmonary embolus. In our unit we have demonstrated a significantly lower transfusion rate, wound complication rate and length of stay, without any significant increase in thromboembolic disease with the use of TA in TKR

British national guidelines recommend agents which antagonise factor Xa or warfarin as prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in lower limb arthroplasty. However, they discourage the use of aspirin prophylaxis. We conducted a prospective, multi-centre audit between two national centres, Ninewells Hospital in Dundee and the Royal Infirmary in Edinburgh to compare bleeding and VTE risk. Only Edinburgh routinely uses aspirin as VTE prophylaxis. The study comprises a number of cycles from 2013 to 2015. Consecutive groups of patients were identified prospectively using elective theatre data and information extracted from their case-notes on type of VTE prophylaxis, VTE occurrence, wound complications and length of hospital stay for a period of nine weeks post-operatively. 262 Edinburgh patients and 92 Dundee patients were included. Most Edinburgh patients were prescribed aspirin in hospital and on discharge (188/262, 71.8%), in line with local protocol. In Dundee, dalteparin was most commonly prescribed in hospital (68/92, 73.9%) and rivaroxaban on discharge (57/92, 62.0%). The Edinburgh group had a 1.5% incidence of pulmonary embolus (PE) and a 1% rate of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), 2% had problems with wound haematoma and one patient (0.4%) required a transfusion; no wound washouts were required. In Dundee there was 0% PE, 2% DVT, 5% had problems with haematoma, 3% required transfusion and 2% required washout. There was no difference in length of hospital stay, with a mode of 4 days for both centres. Non-fatal PE was prevented in Dundee patients but possibly at the cost of greater incidence of wound complications

Since the establishment of our department a multi-modal approach to thromboprophylaxis that uses aspirin for chemical prophylaxis was adopted. In accordance with the latest national recommendations, our routine chemical prophylaxis following arthroplasty was changed to rivaroxaban in 2012 and then dalteparin in 2013. This study aimed to compare venous thromboembolism (VTE) rates during the use of the aspirin-based protocol used from 2004 to 2011 with recent, rivaroxaban and dalteparin-based guidelines. Outcome data from ISD Scotland was retrieved and radiology reports performed for CT pulmonary angiograms and lower limb doppler ultrasound scans in our institution were assessed to identify cases of VTE following primary hip or knee arthroplasty. The incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) and proximal deep venous thrombosis (DVT) was calculated for each year and compared using a Chi-squared test. Additionally, the change in extended thromboprophylaxis regimen was surveyed by recording the discharge prescriptions for consecutive arthroplasty patients for March every year. There were 90 radiologically confirmed cases of DVT or PE between 2004 and 2011 (incidence of 0.71%). The DVT/PE rate was subsequently 0.67% in 2012 and 0.69% in 2013, with a further 29 cases identified. This does not represent a significant change in the venous thromboembolism rates and remains below the national incidence of VTE (1.06%). Aspirin alone was used as chemical thromboprophylaxis in 80.8% of patients from 2004 to 2011, 50.9% in 2012, and 12.1% in 2013. The incidence of VTE at our centre remains favourable to national figures, but the modification of thromboprophylaxis guidelines will incur additional financial costs and has not had a significant reduction on the rate of VTE

Since NICE issued guidance on preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE), the use of chemoprophylaxis has increased dramatically in trauma and orthopaedics. However, enthusiasm is tempered by a lack of data regarding the true incidence of VTE in everyday practice. We investigated the epidemiology of VTE among ambulatory patients with lower limb injuries within our Trust. We identified all patients who suffered pulmonary embolism (PE) or deep vein thrombosis (DVT) over an 18 month period, and cross-referenced them with our trauma database. All lower limb injuries were included, whether operated or not. Hip fractures routinely receive dalteparin and were excluded. There were 11,594 new attendances or post-operative attendances in all fracture clinics over 18 months. Of these, 4530 had lower limb injuries and were immobilised. There were 21 DVTs and 7 PEs in these patients, an incidence of 0.43% and 0.14% respectively. Of note, three DVTs were in patients with Achilles tendon rupture. The incidence of symptomatic VTE is low in a population of ambulant patients with lower limb injuries in casts, without chemical thromboprophylaxis. Prophylaxis for VTE would thus have a large number needed to treat. The costs and complications of chemoprophylaxis should also be considered before it is introduced universally

We present the 12 month data on the relatively novel drug Dabigatran Etexilate (Pradaxa), a new oral anticoagulant which was introduced to combat the risk of post operative venous-thromboembolic disease (VTED) in orthopaedic surgery. This drug was introduced at our hospital in March 2010 and we present our modified protocol of: using 5000u subcutaneous Dalteparin whilst in hospital and giving Dabigatran only on discharge, and at a lower dose (150mg compared to 220mg). We carried out a retrospective analysis of the notes and imaging of every patient who underwent elective hip and knee arthroplasty over 12 months since the drug was introduced. We evaluated the rate of VTED complications and the rate of transfusion and bleeding post operatively. The case series of 370 patients showed a 1% risk of deep vein thrombosis with no pulmonary emboli and 1 death due to an unrelated cause. There was a transfusion rate of 11% with 0.5% patients taken back to theatre for evacuation of haematomas. There were no reported adverse effects of Dabigatran. We argue that our modified protocol for this novel drug should be followed as it is both safe and effective for postoperative anticoagulation

Blood loss following total hip replacement is a major contributor to increase morbidity and length of stay. Various techniques have been described to reduce its occurrence. We now follow a set protocol, combining rivaroxaban for thrombo-prophylaxis and tranexamic acid to reduce immediate postoperative bleeding. Patients and methods:. Using data collected prospectively we looked at 2 groups of consecutive patients undergoing THR. The protocol was the only factor changed during the period studied. Initially we used subcutaneous dalteparin injections and continued use of aspirin in peri-operative period following total hip replacements (Group I–317 patients). A new protocol was introduced involving rivaroxaban for thrombo-prophylaxis with its first dose at least 8 hours from skin closure and stopping aspirin at least 7 days before operation. In addition tranexamic acid was given in a dose of 500 mg (or 1 gm in obese patients) intravenously just prior to incision (Group II–348 patients). We compared these two groups regards Hb drop at 24 hours and blood transfusion requirement. Results:. The average Hb drop at 24 hours postop in group I was 3.08 gm/dl compared to 2.31 in group II. (p<0.001). 62 (19.6%) patients in group I required blood transfusion compared to 11 (3.2%) in group II. (p = 0.001) Perioperative blood loss and length of stay reduction was also significantly different. There was no increase in number of DVT/PE, but the sample size was too small to assess this statistically. Conclusion:. This protocol drastically reduces requirement of postoperative blood transfusion requirement helping in reducing the length of stay following hip replacements

The August 2015 Trauma Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Thromboprophylaxis not required in lower limb fractures; Subclinical thyroid dysfunction and fracture risk: moving the boundaries in fracture; Posterior wall fractures refined; Neurological injury and acetabular fracture surgery; Posterior tibial plateau fixation; Tibial plateau fractures in the longer term; Comprehensive orthogeriatric care and hip fracture; Compartment syndrome: in the eye of the beholder?

The October 2012 Hip & Pelvis Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: diagnosing the infected hip replacement; whether tranexamic acid has a low complication rate; the relationship between poor cementing technique and early failure of resurfacing; debridement and retention for the infected replacement; triple-tapered stems and bone mineral density; how early discharge can be bad for your sleep; an updated QFracture algorithm to predict the risk of an osteoporotic fracture; and local infiltration analgesia and total hip replacement.