Purpose. Cognitive Muscular Therapy (CMT) is a new treatment for low back pain which integrates psychological techniques for pain management alongside training to improve postural control. Rather than focus on postural alignment or strength, CMT aims to improve the regulation of postural tone (low-level activity which supports the body against gravity). This is achieved by teaching patients an awareness of compensatory paraspinal activation, which can be triggered by overactivity of the abdominal muscles. The aim of this study was to understand whether CMT could reduce symptoms associated with low back pain and improve paraspinal muscle activation. Methods and results. Fifteen patients with chronic low back pain received seven weekly sessions of CMT from a physiotherapist. Clinical data was captured at baseline and two weeks after the intervention using the Roland-Morris questionnaire and the pain catastrophising scale. Activation of the erector spinae muscle during walking was also measured at baseline and after the final intervention session. Change data were analysed using paired t-tests. There was a 75% reduction (p<0.001) in the Roland-Morris score from a mean (SD) of 9.3(2.9) to 2.3(2.6), along with a 78% reduction in pain catastrophising (p<0.002) from 16.6(13) to 3.7(4.8). Activation of the contralateral erector spinae muscles reduced by 30% (p<0.01) during the contralateral swing phase of walking. Conclusion. In this small sample, CMT delivered large clinical improvements and reduced activation of the low back muscles during walking. Larger randomised trials are now required to confirm whether CMT could outperform existing physiotherapy treatments for chronic back pain. Conflict of interest. No conflicts of interest. Source of funding. University of Salford

The relationship between pain catastrophising and emotional disorders including anxiety and depression in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) undergoing total joint replacement (TJR) is an emerging area of study. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between pain catastrophising, anxiety, depression and preoperative patient characteristics. A prospective cohort study of preoperative TJR patients at one centre over 12-months was conducted. We examined association between catastrophising, anxiety, depression and preoperative patient characteristics including demographics, pain and function. Pain catastrophising was assessed using the Pain Catastrophising Scale (PCS), and anxiety/depression using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A, HADS-D). Patient perceived level of hip/knee pain was measured using a visual analogue (VAS) pain scale. Patient perception of function was measured using the Oxford Score. Preoperative radiographic grading of OA was determined using the Kellgren and Lawrence (K-L) scale. Logistic regression was used to assess pattern of relationship between preoperative characteristics and PCS or HADS. Adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported. A secondary quantile regression analysis examined whether a model not restricted to pre-defined PCS and HADS categories would yield comparable results to the logistic regression model described in the primary analysis. P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The sample included 463 TJR patients (178 hips, 285 knees). VAS pain (OR 1.23,95%CI 1.04–1.45) and Oxford score (OR 1.13,95%CI 1.07–1.20) were identified as significant predictors for PCS. The same two variables were the strong predictors for all sub-domains of PCS excluding rumination. Oxford Score was the only significant predictor for abnormal HADS-A (OR 1.10,95%CI 1.04–1.17) while VAS pain (OR 1.27,95%CI 1.02–1.52) and Oxford (OR 1.09,95%CI 1.01–1.17) were significant predictors for abnormal HADS-D. Similar pattern of association for PCS and HADS was observed in the quantile regression model, where larger VAS pain and Oxford scores significantly increased median PCS across all domains. Female gender, younger age or having a higher ASA grade were associated with higher median HADS-A, but unlike in the logistic regression, this association was statistically significant. Pain catastrophising and emotional disorders generally result in poor functional outcomes in TJR patients. The most important predictor of catastrophising, anxiety/depression is pain and subjective function. At risk patients include those with high preoperative pain with generally good preoperative function, as well as younger females with significant comorbidities. Such patients should be identified, and targeted psychological therapy implemented preoperatively to optimise coping strategies and adaptive behaviour to mitigate inferior TJR outcomes including pain and patient dissatisfaction

Purpose and background. Acute and chronic spinal pain are major causes of disability, and many patients use analgesics to treat their pain. However, increased use of analgesics, particularly prescription opioids have the potential to be overused and cause dependence. Psychological factors such as stress, anxiety, depression, pain acceptance, pain catastrophising and alexithymia influence both the pain response and analgesic use, yet to date no studies have explored these variables in spinal pain patients. Therefore, the aim of this study is to assess the nature, prevalence and correlates of analgesic dependence among patients with acute or chronic spinal pain. Methods and results. Patients over the age of 18 attending outpatient services at the Royal Derby Hospital with complaints of either acute or chronic spinal pain and currently using analgesics to treat their pain completed the Current Opioid Misuse Measure, the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21, the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-8, the Pain Catastrophising Scale, the Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20, and the Leeds Dependence Questionnaire, a measure of analgesic dependence. Preliminary findings from 52 patients (16 males and 36 females) with chronic spinal pain ranging from 23–88 years old, show that greater pain catastrophising is a significant predictor of analgesic dependence (t = 2.74, df = 51, p = 0.009). Conclusion. The study findings can inform the development of appropriate interventions targeting pain catastrophising to prevent and/or treat analgesic dependence, as well as contributing to potential future research on the understanding of tapering spinal pain patients off analgesic medication. No conflicts of interest. No funding obtained

Background. Surgical intervention for hallux valgus and hallux rigidus is an option for patients presenting with severe pain and deformity. Literature suggest that patients with high Pain Catastrophisation Scores (PCS) have poorer outcomes in spinal and to a lesser extent in arthroplasty surgery. There is however very little evidence pertaining to foot and ankle surgery. Aim. We aimed to study whether catastrophisation as measured by PCS influenced the outcomes following surgery for Hallux valgus and rigidus. Methodology. Ethical approval for this prospective portfolio study was obtained from NRES Committee South Central and Oxford. Approval was granted from the local R&D department prior to data collection. All patients listed for surgery for hallux pathology to the four senior authors were invited to participate. Recruitment into the study started in September 2017 and is ongoing. Pain catastrophising score (PCS), Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (Mox-FQ), Visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and EQ-5D-3L questionnaires were completed Pre-op (baseline), and at 3, 6 and 12- months post-surgery. Results. 93 patients with minimum follow-up of 6 months were analysed using SPSS software. A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. The mean age of the patients was 58.5 years and 83% were women. 70% of the patients had surgery for hallux valgus and rest for rigidus. Both PROMS and PCS improved significantly following surgical intervention. Patients with higher pre-operative PCS had a worse 6-month PROM score and more pain. Conclusion. This study confirms that pre-operative catastrophisation as demonstrated by a high PCS score has an adverse effect on outcomes following hallux surgery. Risk stratifying patients based on their Pre-op PCS scores may be a useful strategy to identify those at risk of poorer outcomes. We recommend that behavioural change interventions should be considered to try to improve outcomes in patients with pre-op PCS

Background. Embodiment- and distraction-based approaches to immersive virtual reality (IVR) show promise in treating persistent low back pain (PLBP). However, which approach is more effective is unclear. This study aims to evaluate the impact of distraction- and embodiment-based IVR on pain processing and patient-reported outcome measures in PLBP. Method. Individuals with PLBP were randomised to receive eight sessions of either distraction- or embodiment-based IVR over two weeks. Outcome measures were evaluated at baseline and after the eighth session. Pain processing was evaluated using conditioned pain modulation (CPM) and temporal summation (TS). Results. Three participants (n=2 embodiment, n=1 distraction) have completed all eight IVR sessions. Preliminary results indicate a decrease from pre to post-intervention in Numerical Pain Rating Scale score (pre: 5/10, 6/10, 5/10; post: 2/10, 5/10, 2/10) and Pain Catastrophising Scale score (pre: 34/52, 11/52, 38/52; post: 11/52, 8/52, 12/52), with no clear trend in other self-reported measures (Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale, Oswestry low back disability questionnaire, fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire, Tampa scale of kinesiophobia). Preliminary results suggest a potential increase in NPRS absolute values from pre- to post-intervention in CPM (pre: -2.7, -2.3, -2.0; post: -3.3, -2.0, -4.3) and TS (pre-1.2, 2.5, 2.4; post: 1.4, 2.5, 3.1). Conclusion. Eight sessions of IVR may reduce pain severity and pain catastrophising in people with PLBP and may increase the efficacy of endogenous pain modulatory systems. Data collection is ongoing to compare the effect of distraction- and embodiment-based IVR. Conflicts of Interest. There are no conflicts of interest. Sources of Funding. This project is funded by the Saudi Arabia Cultural Bureau

Introduction. The STarT Back trial demonstrated that targeting back pain treatment according to patient prognosis (low, medium or high-risk subgroups) is effective. However, the mechanisms leading to these improved treatment outcomes remain unknown. This study aimed to identify which psychological variables included in the study were mediating treatment outcome for all patients and within the low, medium and high-risk subgroups. Methods. Secondary analysis was conducted on 466 patients randomised to the active treatment arm with 4-month follow-up available. Psychological variables included depression (HADs), fear (TSK), catastrophising (PCS), bothersomeness and illness perception constructs (IPQ brief) e.g. personal control. Treatment outcome was characterised using change in disability score (RMDQ) at 4-months. Residualised change scores were calculated for each variable and Pearson's correlations were calculated overall and at the subgroup level to determine potential mediating variables for disability improvement. Results. Overall, correlations with RMDQ change were .62 for change in bothersomeness, .56 for change in catastrophising, .51 for change in fear, .48 for change in anxiety, .58 for change in depression, −.32 for change in personal control and .40 for change in symptom identity. The strength of correlation generally increased from low to high-risk subgroups, e.g. bothersomeness (low=.54, high=.70). However, the predominant variables mediating treatment outcome were common across risk-groups. Conclusion. The psychological variables which were highly correlated with improvements in disability were bothersomeness, depression and catastrophising. This finding was consistent across low, medium and high-risk subgroups. This study is ongoing and further mediation analysis using structural equation modelling is in progress. Conflicts of Interest. None. Source of Funding. NIHR Spinal Pain Programme grant

Background. Being involved in litigation is associated with poor outcomes, higher levels of pain, disability, catastrophising, fear-avoidance and other psychological factors. Poor access to treatments can contribute to chronicity of symptoms and poor outcomes, especially in patients involved in litigation with a longer time since the accident. Purpose. To examine the relationship between time since the accident, access to treatments and current psychological variables. Methods. Eleven patients completed the Pain Catastrophising Scale, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, Zung Depression Inventory, Modified Somatic Perceptions Questionnaire as well as details about the accident, working status and recalled access to treatments. The results were analysed qualitatively and quantitavely. Results. The mean time since the accident was 32 months and the mean measures are: ZDI (41.9±9.3), PCS (33.3±9.4), TSK (47.5±9.2), MSPQ (15±8.4). Eight subjects are not currently working and three are working part-time. There was a positive correlation between time since the accident and depression (r=0.679) and MSPQ (r=0.547) but not for other variables. Average sequence of recalled treatments is outlined. Conclusion. Our results indicate that measures of depression and somatic perceptions keep increasing with time whereas catastrophising and kineshiophobia are relatively constant in a small group of litigants with spinal pain. The recalled treatments reflect a focus on invasive treatments with little long-term positive outcome and only one patient receiving the recommended combined physical and psychological programme. I can confirm that this abstract has not previously been published in whole or substantial part nor has it been presented previously at a national meeting. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Source of funding: No funding obtained

Persistent post-surgical pain affects 10%-80% of individuals after common operations, and is more common among patients with psychological factors such as depression, anxiety, or catastrophising. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised, controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy of perioperative psychotherapy for persistent postsurgical pain and physical impairment. We searched Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials to identify relevant RCTs, in any language, from inception of each database to September 1, 2016. Paired independent reviewers identified studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We pooled treatment effects of perioperative psychotherapy on similar outcomes across eligible trials, focusing on intention-to-treat analysis. We used random effects models to perform all meta-analyses. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system was used to assess the quality of evidence. Our search found 15 trials (2220 patients) that were eligible for review. For both persistent post-surgical pain and physical impairment, perioperative education was ineffective, while active psychotherapy suggested a benefit (test of interaction P=0.01 for both outcomes). Moderate quality evidence showed that active perioperative psychotherapy (cognitive-behaviour therapy, relaxation therapy, or both) significantly reduced persistent post-surgical pain [weighted mean difference (WMD) −1.06 cm on a 10 cm visual analogue scale for pain, 95% confidence interval (CI) −1.56 to −0.55 cm, risk difference (RD) for achieving no more than mild pain (3 cm or less) 14%, 95% CI 8–21%] and physical impairment [WMD −9.87% on the 0–100% Oswestry Disability Index, 95% CI −13.42 to −6.32%, RD for achieving no more than mild disability (20% or less) 21%, 95% CI 13–29%]. Perioperative cognitive behavioural therapy and relaxation therapy are effective for reducing persistent pain and physical impairment after surgery. High quality evidence shows no significant effects of perioperative education or psychological support on persistent post-surgical pain or physical impairment compared with usual care. Future studies should explore targeted psychotherapy for surgical patients at higher risk for poor outcome

Background & purpose: A number of studies have identified factors associated with a poor prognosis in LBP patients. Many of these prognostic indicators have a natural course that is transient or recurrent in nature, and identification of these factors therefore depends on the timing of measurement. This work aims to examine the time-course of selected prognostic indicators for LBP in a group of primary care patients, and to assess the most appropriate points to measure those indicators. Methods: Information on a group of selected prognostic indicators (including disability, pain intensity, leg pain, catastrophising, bothersomeness and work absence) was obtained from a consecutive cohort of 935 primary care LBP consulters. Data was collected using postal questionnaires within two weeks of consultation and each month for the subsequent six-months. Poor outcomes were defined as Chronic Pain Grade IV or work absence due to LBP at six-months. Results: At baseline, 30% to 70% of the sample reported each of the indicators, this fell by half one month later. The baseline measures with the highest odds of a poor prognosis were high disability, high pain intensity and catastrophising. Most indicators had stronger associations with outcome when measured at one month than at baseline. People reporting the indicators at both baseline and one month had increased odds of a poor prognosis compared to people reporting the indicator once, or not reporting it at all. Conclusion: Indicators for poor LBP prognosis are more strongly associated with outcome when present at more than one time point. This may be because multiple measurements better reflect the patients’ true status by adjusting for regression to the mean. Standard clinical practice of asking patients to return at a later time for re-assessment should be applied to research when the prognosis of LBP patients is to be evaluated

Background. Depression, anxiety, catastrophising, and fear-avoidance beliefs are some of the so-called “yellow flags” that predict a poor outcome in back patients. Many surgeons have difficulty assessing yellow flags, perhaps due to the complexity of existing instruments and time constraints during consultations. We developed a brief tool to allow the systematic evaluation of core flags. Methods. Data from 4 questionnaires (ZUNG depression (N=399); Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (Anxiety-subscale) (N=308); Pain Catastrophising (N=766); Fear Avoidance Beliefs (N=736)) were analysed to identify the respective single item that best represented the full scale score. The 4 items formed the “Core Yellow Flags Index” (CYFI). 1'768 patients completed CYFI and a Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) preoperatively, and COMI 3 and 12mo later (FU). Results. The individual flag items correlated with their corresponding full-length questionnaires: 0.71 (depression), 0.81 (catastrophising), 0.77 (anxiety), 0.83 (fear avoidance beliefs). Cronbach's α for the 4 items was 0.79. Structural equation modelling revealed that CYFI explained a unique proportion of the variance in COMI at 3 months' FU (β=0.23, p< 0.001) and also at 12 months FU (β=0.20, p< 0.001). Conclusion. The 4-item CYFI proved to be a simple, practicable tool for routinely assessing key psychological attributes in spine surgery patients; it made a relevant contribution in predicting postoperative outcome. CYFI's items were similar to those in the “STarTBack screening-tool”, used in primary care to predict back pain chronicity, further substantiating its validity. Its wider use may help improve the accuracy of predictive models derived using spine registry data. No conflicts of interest. No funding obtained

Background. A wide array of measures has been developed to assess the role of psychological factors in the development and persistence of pain. Yet there is likely to be considerable conceptual overlap between such measures, and consequently a lack of clarity about the importance of psychological factors. Purpose. To investigate whether conceptual overlap exists within psychological measures used in back pain research. Methods. An observational cohort study of 1591 back pain primary care consulters provided data on anxiety, depression, self-efficacy, coping, illness perceptions, fear avoidance and catastrophising. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (EFA and CFA) was carried out at the sub-scale level (n=20) to investigate factor structure. Derived factors were then tested using hierarchical linear regression in relation to clinical outcomes (pain intensity and disability). Results. EFA derived 4 factors from the sub-scale measures. Factors were termed ‘distress’ (comprising depression, anxiety, pain self-efficacy, fear avoidance, catastrophising), ‘cognitive’ (cognitive coping strategies), ‘causes’ (psychological, immunity, risk factors) and ‘future’ (expectancies of potential treatment and recovery), and accounted for 65.5% of the data. CFA confirmed the validity of these factors. The distress factor was found to have the strongest association with patients' outcomes, accounting for 28.7% of the variance in pain intensity, and 53.6% in disability. Conclusion. Considerable overlap exists in psychological measures used in back pain research. Most measures tap in to patients' emotional distress; this factor was shown to have the greatest association with clinical outcomes. These findings have implications for the way psychological measures are used in back pain research. No conflicts of interest. Source of funding: Programme Grant awarded by the Arthritis Research UK [13413] and Dr KM Dunn's Wellcome Trust Grant [083572]. This abstract has not been previously published in whole or substantial part nor has it been presented previously at a national meeting

Purpose. To compare the contribution of physical, psychological and social indicators to predicting disability after one year between consulters with low back pain (LBP) of less than 3 months duration and more than 3 months duration. Methods. Data from two large prospective cohort studies of consecutive patients consulting with LBP in general practices were merged, with disability measured by the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). There were complete data for 258 cases with acute/subacute LBP and 668 cases with chronic LBP at 12 months follow-up. Univariate and adjusted multivariate regression analyses of various potential prognostic indicators for disability at 12 months were carried out. Results. There were significant differences between those with acute/subacute versus chronic LBP with regard to baseline characteristics and clinical course of disability during the year of follow-up. The final multivariate regression models, adjusting for baseline disability scores, age, gender, and study sample, showed that being non-employed, having widespread pain, a high level of Chronic Pain Grade, and catastrophising were the strongest prognostic indicators for disability at 12 months in both those with acute/subacute and those with chronic LBP. Fear of pain was significantly associated with disability in chronic LBP but not in acute/subacute LBP. Conclusion. Despite significant differences between acute/subacute and chronic LBP in baseline characteristics and clinical course over one year, a similar set of prognostic indicators influence long-term disability in both groups. This provides further evidence that chronicity is determined early in an episode of LBP and highlights again the potential for prevention if these prognostic factors can be systematically identified and targeted

Study design: A systematic review of prospective cohort studies in low back pain. Objectives: To evaluate the evidence implicating psychological factors in the development of chronicity in low back pain. Summary of background: The biopsychosocial model is gaining acceptance in low back pain, and has provided a basis for screening measurements, guidelines and interventions. However, to date, the unique contribution of psychological factors in the transition from an acute presentation to chronicity has not been rigorously assessed. Methods: A systematic literature search was followed by the application of three sets of criteria to each study: methodological quality, quality of measurement of psychological factors, and quality of statistical analysis. Two reviewers blindly coded each study, followed by independent assessment by a statistician. Studies were divided into three environments: primary care, pain clinics and workplace-based studies. Results: Twenty-five publications (18 cohorts) included psychological factors at baseline. Six of these met acceptability criteria for methodology, psychological measurement and statistical analysis. Increased risk of chronicity (persisting symptoms and/or disability) from depressive mood and, to a lesser extent, somatisation emerged as the main findings. Acceptable evidence generally was not found for other psychological factors, although weak support emerged for the role of catastrophising as a coping strategy. Conclusions: Both depressive mood and somatisation are implicated in the transition to chronic low back pain. The development and testing of clinical interventions specifically targeting these factors is indicated. In view of the importance attributed to other psychological factors, there is a need to clarify their role in back-related disability through rigorous prospective studies

The patient with a painful arthritic knee awaiting total knee arthroplasty (TKA) requires a multidisciplinary approach. Optimal control of acute post-operative pain and the prevention of chronic persistent pain remains a challenge. The aim of this paper is to evaluate whether stratification of patients can help identify those who are at particular risk for severe acute or chronic pain.

Intense acute post-operative pain, which is itself a risk factor for chronic pain, is more common in younger, obese female patients and those suffering from central pain sensitisation. Pre-operative pain, in the knee or elsewhere in the body, predisposes to central sensitisation. Pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee may also trigger neuropathic pain and may be associated with chronic medication like opioids, leading to a state of nociceptive sensitisation called ‘opioid-induced hyperalgesia’. Finally, genetic and personality related risk factors may also put patients at a higher risk for the development of chronic pain.

Those identified as at risk for chronic pain would benefit from specific peri-operative management including reduction in opioid intake pre-operatively, the peri-operative use of antihyperalgesic drugs such as ketamine and gabapentinoids, and a close post-operative follow-up in a dedicated chronic pain clinic.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B(10 Suppl A):45–8.

The October 2014 Spine Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: microdiscectomy is not exactly a hands-down winner; lumbar spinal stenosis unpicked; Wallis implant helpful in lumbosacral decompression; multidisciplinary rehabilitation is good for back pain; and understanding the sciatic stretch test.

The October 2015 Trauma Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: PCA not the best in resuscitation; Impact of trauma centre care; Quality of life after a hip fracture; Recovery and severity of injury: open tibial fractures in the spotlight; Assessment of the triplane fractures; Signs of an unstable paediatric pelvis; Safe insertion of SI screws: are two views required?; Post-operative delirium under the spotlight; Psychological effects of fractures; K-wires cost effective in DRAFFT