Concepts in glenoid tracking and treatment strategies of glenoid bone loss are well established. Initial observations in our practice in Singapore showed few patients with major bone loss requiring glenoid reconstructions. This led us to investigate the incidence of and the extent of bone loss in our patients with shoulder instability. Our study revealed bony Bankart lesions were seen in 46% of our patients but glenoid bone loss measured only 6–10% of the glenoid surface. In the same study we found that arthroscopic labral repair with capsular plication and Mason-Ellen suturing (Hybrid technique) was sufficient to stabilise patients with bipolar bone defects and minor glenoid bone loss. This led us to develop the concept of minor bone loss and a new algorithm. Our algorithm and strategies to deal with major bone loss will also be discussed, and techniques & outcomes of Arthroscopic Bony Bankart repair, Arthroscopic Glenoid Reconstruction and Arthroscopic Remplissage procedures will be shown

Aim: Traumatic shoulder dislocation in patients older than 50 years is an unusual injury with specific anatomic lesions and different treatment considerations than these encountered in younger patients. We present our experience in treating such kind of injuries. Patients-methods: Between January December 2002 9 patients-4 males, 5 females – with ages ranging between 50–72 years (mean age 64 y.), have been treated in our department suffering from first traumatic shoulder dislocation. Rehabilitation program and overall recovery progress was observed in an outpatient basis while postoperative outcome was evaluated using ASES and UCLA rating scores. Results: In 4 patients rotator cuff tear was found and reconstructed by suturing the lesion. One (1) of these patients, who had a coexisted bony Bankart lesion, presented 1 ½ month postoperative with recurrence of dislocation. Bony Bankart lesion prevented reduction in 2 patients and was reconstructed using open stabilization in one and arthroscopic to the other. HAGL lesion was detected in another patient and treated with open reduction and shoulder stabilization. Finally 2 patients with shoulder dislocation and coexisted greater tuberosity fracture were treated with closed reduction. Conclusions: Ttraumatic shoulder dislocation in patients older than 50 years consists a distinct entity which if inadequately treated leaves the shoulder with severe functional impairment. Recurrent shoulder dislocation is an unusual complication in such patients but on the other hand rotator cuff tears and glenoid bony lesions are frequently encountered necessitating treatment. Postoperative patients should be examined in small intervals with a high degree of suspicion for the above mentioned coexisted lesions

Primary traumatic anterior dislocations of the shoulder are common injuries which are complicated by persistent instability in a high proportion of patients. Surgery is successful and has been well described in the literature. Current controversies centre on the role of open and arthroscopic techniques. We describe the outcomes of a new mini-incision surgical (MIS) technique which was developed within our institution. 27 patients with traumatic shoulder instability (2 bilateral) were prospectively entered into a database between June 1998 and March 2008. The mean age was 31 years and the mean follow up period was 53 months. 29 shoulders underwent diagnostic shoulder arthroscopy and mini-incision surgery using a delto-pectoral approach and 3 bio-absorbable anchors. Patients reported no re-dislocation in 24 shoulders (83%). 5 shoulders, including one with a bony Bankart lesion, re-dislocated with additional trauma. One shoulder required revision to a Bristow-Latarjet. Satisfaction was very good in 16 and good in 9 shoulders (83%). 19 patients had minimal or no pain. 8 patients experienced moderate shoulder pain with the other two complaining of severe pain. QuickDASH scores were encouraging. Our technique combines the ability to appreciate all shoulder pathology arthroscopically with the visualisation gained in open Bankart surgery. Functionally, patients do well. The higher than expected re-dislocation rate is concerning. We advise that long term outcomes are needed

Hypothesis. Recurrent shoulder dislocation is associated with bony defect of the glenoid rim, commonly seen along with bankart tear - a soft tissue injury of glenoid labrum. This cadaveric study compares the bone block effect of coracoid transfer using using two common techniques, Classical Latarjet technique and the Congruent-Arc Latarjet. We hypothesized that the force needed to dislocate the shoulder would be greater in Congruent Arc technique than the Classical Latarjet, because of increased contact surface area as a result of greater linear dimensions. Material and methods. We dissected 14 cadaveric shoulders. A bony Bankart lesion was created in form of an inverted pear glenoid. The humeral head was attached to a pulley system that was sequentially loaded until the shoulder dislocated anteriorly. The force needed to dislocate was noted. This was repeated after coracoid transfer with two common techniques, Classical Latarjet technique and the Congruent-Arc Latarjet. Results. The mean force required to dislocate shoulder post-Classical Latarjet technique was 325.71N, compared to 123.57 N in uncorrected shoulder. Similarly, the mean force required to dislocate shoulder post Congruent-Arc Latarjet technique was 327.14 N compared to 123.57 N in uncorrected shoulder. The two-tailed P value in either case was less than 0.0001, thus statistically significant. Unpaired t-test was done to compare the force required to dislocate the shoulder post procedure. Mean force required to dislocate shoulder post-Classical Latarjet, was 325.7N compared to 327N in post-Congruent Arc. The two-tailed P value equals 0.9020 and the 95% confidence interval was from −25.05 to 22.19, thus the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion. The results confirm that both (Classical and Congruent-Arc Latarjet) techniques are good for addressing the shoulder instability, however bone block effect provided by one is not superior to other

This study retrospectively reviewed the pathology after the first traumatic incident of shoulder subluxation or dislocation in 12 male and four female patients with a mean age of 14.9 years (12 to 16). All had undergone surgery and were seen over a five-year period. Patients seen after a second traumatic dislocation were excluded. All patients had been treated conservatively for between 4 and 18 months. When conservative treatment failed, all patients underwent examination and shoulder arthroscopy. All 16 had Hill-Sachs lesions of varying degrees. Bankart repairs were done in 14 patients with Bankart lesions. Two patients had more than 25% bone loss of the glenoid, and Latarjet procedures were undertaken. One SLAP-III and three SLAP-II repairs were done. The follow-up period varied from three months to five years. All patients were either examined or interviewed by telephone. Failures were defined as recurrence of symptoms or redislocations. All patients resumed their sporting activities at similar or higher levels. Two patients with multidirectional shoulder laxity had further possible subluxations but were treated conservatively. One sustained a massive bony Bankart lesion a year after a Bankart repair and a Latarjet procedure was subsequently performed. Patients in this age group should be considered at high risk for recurrence. If intensive short-term rehabilitation fails, they should be managed surgically immediately

Aim: To evaluate the usefulness of the apical oblique projection of the shoulder in determining radiographic signs of instability. Methods: Radiographs from 50 consecutive patients who presented for surgery for treatment of symptomatic unilateral shoulder instability were evaluated. Standard radiographic views had been obtained (anteroposterior [AP], lateral and axillary view) pre-operatively along with an apical oblique. The apical oblique view is obtained by placing the patient in a 45 degrees posterior-oblique position and angling the beam 45 degrees caudad. The radiographs were reviewed independently by two radiologists. Each radiograph was evaluated for evidence of any Hill-Sachs or bony Bankart lesions that were accepted as radiographic signs of anterior instability. Comparison of the diagnostic yield of the standard views and the apical oblique were made. Results: The radiographs of 32 males and 18 females with an average age of 27 years (range: 17 to 41 years) were included in the series. Pathology (Hill-Sachs, Bankart lesions or both) was seen on an apical oblique in 93% of cases compared with AP (48%), lateral(17%) and axillary(32%) views. Taken collectively the standard views showed pathology in only 72% of cases. Conclusions: The apical oblique view is easy for the radiographer to obtain, can be performed using standard imaging equipment and can be obtained pain-free in the acute setting. The diagnostic yield was significantly higher than the standard trauma series. The apical oblique view should be added to these in cases of suspected shoulder instability

Shoulder Instability impacts on the ability of military personnel to fulfil their operational role and maintain sporting competence. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Arthrogram (MRA) are increasingly available as diagnostic adjuncts. We analysed MR reports from personnel undergoing stabilisation, correlating clinical diagnosis with operative findings and reviewed the literature in order to recommend improvements. We report a retrospective, consecutive case note analysis of 106 personnel undergoing open anterior capsulolabral reconstruction (ACLR) by a single surgeon. Seventy patients had MR (48 MRA, 22 MRI). Commonly reported pathology included Hill Sachs Lesions (41%), Soft tissue (59%) and bony Bankart lesions (16%), capsular laxity (20 %), supraspinatus lesion (20%), ACJ disease (13%) and SLAP tear (12%). The sensitivity of MR for identification of labral lesions was 82% with a specificity of 86%. For bony glenoid lesions, sensitivity was 63% and specificity 94%. Disparity between report and operative findings occurred mainly in standard MRI. Patients with lesions unrelated to instability achieved a pain free functioning shoulder following stabilisation. 100% of patients referred for ACLR with clinical evidence of instability without MR had positive pre-operative and operative correlation with instability. In 5 cases, the original equivocal MRI was repeated by MRA due to clinical suspicion of instability. In all cases the repeat MRA correlated with pre-operative and operative findings of instability. In 5 cases with equivocal clinical findings, MRA provided confirmation of instability. Delay in referral due to scanning and follow up ranged from 0 – 15 weeks. The diagnosis of those instigating referral is accurate. Reporting of MR is open to variation and has cost implications. MRA performed by a radiologist with a musculoskeletal specialist interest is recommended on an individual basis only and routine use of non-arthrographic studies should be discontinued. This will improve the efficiency of the fast track pathway

The management of bony lesions associated with glenohumeral instability has been open to debate. Invariably a significant period of time elapses between injury and surgery during which the bony fragment may atrophy and reduce both in size and in quality. Histomorphometric bone analyses were prospectively performed on the glenoid bone fragments harvested during the modified Latarjet operation. The main purpose of the study was to assess the viability of the bone. Biopsies were obtained from 21 patients that had given informed consent. Median age was 21 years (range 16–50). All were male patients. The most important sports identified were rugby (64%) and water sports (surfing, water polo, water skiing, surfing (21%)). Mean glenoid bone loss on CT scan was 17% (range 10–50%). Thirty-three percent had bone loss greater than 20%. Gross morphology of glenolabral fragments identified a single large fragment (11/21); dominant large fragment plus smaller fragments (7/21); multiple fragments (4/21). Single large fragments comprised 52% of the study. Mean volume and mass of bony fragments were 2.18 ml (range 1–3 ml) and 1.64 gms (range 0.43–2.8 g), respectively. Histology of the specimens revealed no bone in three of the 21 specimens. Bony necrosis was present in 8/18 (44%) of the specimens. From a histopathological point of view, reattachment of these devitalized bone fragments by screws or anchors may result in predictable operative failure and recurrent instability. We can therefore not support the practice of “repair” of bony Bankart lesions based on the above findings

Shoulder Instability impacts on the ability of military personnel to fulfil their operational role and maintain sporting competence. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Arthrogram (MRA) are increasingly available as diagnostic adjuncts. We analysed MR reports from personnel undergoing stabilisation, correlating clinical diagnosis with operative findings and reviewed the literature in order to recommend improvements. This was a retrospective, consecutive case note analysis of 106 personnel undergoing open anterior capsulolabral reconstruction (ACLR) by a single surgeon. 70 patients had MR (48 MRA, 22 MRI). Commonly reported pathology included Hill Sachs Lesions (41%), Soft tissue (59%) and bony Bankart lesions (16%), capsular laxity (20 %), supraspinatus lesion (20%), ACJ disease (13%) and SLAP tear (12%). The sensitivity of MR for identification of labral lesions was 82% with a specificity of 86%. For bony glenoid lesions, sensitivity was 63% and specificity 94%. Disparity between report and operative findings occurred mainly in standard MRI. Patients with lesions unrelated to instability achieved a pain free functioning shoulder following stabilisation. 100% of patients referred for ACLR with clinical evidence of instability without MR had positive pre-operative and operative correlation with instability. In 5 cases, the original equivocal MRI was repeated by MRA due to clinical suspicion of instability. In all cases the repeat MRA correlated with pre-operative and operative findings of instability. In 5 cases with equivocal clinical findings, MRA provided confirmation of instability. Delay in referral due to scanning and follow up ranged from 0–15 weeks. The diagnosis of those instigating referral is accurate. Reporting of MR is open to variation and has cost implications. MRA performed by a radiologist with a musculoskeletal specialist interest is recommended on an individual basis only and routine use of non-arthrographic studies should be discontinued. This will improve the efficiency of the fast track pathway

We document intra-articular pathology in collision athletes with shoulder instability and describe the ‘collision shoulder’ – a direct impact without dislocation, with unusual labral injury, significant intra-articular pathology and neurology. 183 collision athletes were treated for labral injuries in 3 centres. Details of injury mechanism and intra-articular pathology at surgery were recorded. Premier league and International (Elite) comprised 72 players. A tackle was implicated in 52% of injuries and 65% had a dislocation. The mechanism of injury was ABduction External Rotation (ABER) in 45%, direct impact 36%, abduction only 8% and axial load 6%. Dislocation occurred in 51% of shoulders with ABER mechanism. A Bankart lesion was found in 79% of these shoulders; Hill-Sachs in 58% and Bony Bankart in 26%. Inferoposterior labral tears were present in only 11%, Superior Labral Antero-Posterior (SLAP) lesions in 32% and partial injury to the rotator cuff in 32%. In those sustaining a direct impact to the shoulder, 61% did not document dislocation, had a high incidence of inferoposterior labral involvement (50%), neurological symptoms (32%), but a low incidence of Bankart (33%), Hill-Sachs (22%) and Bony Bankart (11%) lesions. The mechanism did not affect incidence of superior labral/SLAP tears (18%), or capsular tears (including Humeral Avulsion of Glenohumeral Ligaments – HAGL) – 15%. Elite athletes had less dislocations (43% vs 74%) irrespective of mechanism, but were 40% more likely to have neurology, posteroinferior labral, cartilaginous or capsular injuries. They had twice the incidence of Bony Bankart and rotator cuff lesions and 5 times more SLAP/superior labral tears. Collision athletes with shoulder instability have a wide spectrum of pathoanatomy of the labrum and frequent associated intra-articular lesions. Significant injury often occurs in the Elite athlete and those sustaining a direct hit without dislocation (the ‘Collision Shoulder’)

The June 2014 Shoulder & Elbow Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: suprascapular nerve and rotator cuff pathology; anchors in Bankart repair: it’s not what you’ve got, but how you use it; not all shoulder PROMs are equal; reverse shoulder arthroplasty OK in trauma; not all in the mind: frozen shoulder personality debunked; open and arthroscopic repair equivalent in shoulder instability; natural history of olecranon fractures not so bleak?; and resurfacing of the shoulder: a Danish perspective.