Introduction. Insufficient arthroscopic cuff tear reconstruction leading to massive osteoarthritis and irreparable rotator cuff tears might be salvaged by implantation of an inverted total shoulder prosthesis Delta in the elderly. However, despite the generally high success rate and satisfying clinical results of inverted total shoulder arthroplasty, this treatment option has potential complications. Therefore, the objective of this study was a prospective evaluation of the clinical and radiological outcome after a minimum of 2 years follow-up of patients undergoing inverted shoulder replacement with or without prior rotator cuff repair. Patients and Methods. Sixty-eight shoulders in 66 patients (36 women and 30 men) operated between February 2002 and June 2007 with a mean age of 66 years (ranging from 53 to 84 years) were first assessed preoperatively and then at minimum 2 years follow-up, using the Constant score for pain, Constant Shoulder Score, Oxford Shoulder Score, UCLA Shoulder rating scale, DASH Score, Rowe Score for Instability and Oxford Instability Score. 29 patients (Group A) had undergone previous shoulder arthroscopy for cuff tear reconstruction at a mean of 29 months (range 12 to 48 months) before surgery and 39 patients (Group B) underwent primary implantation of an inverted total shoulder prosthesis Delta. Any complications in both groups were assessed according to Goslings and Gouma. Results. We report statistically significant improvements of all obtained scores at a mean follow-up of 42 months (ranging from 24 to 96 months) in both groups. Significant outcome differences between 29 patients with previous shoulder arthroscopy for cuff tear reconstruction and 39 without previous shoulder arthroscopy were not observed. Eight complications occurred altogether, in terms of a nerve lesion once, loosening of the humeral stem three times, and loosening or fracture of the glenoid component four times. Conclusion. We did not detect any statistically significant impact of previous insufficient shoulder arthroscopy for cuff tear reconstruction on the outcome and survival rate after the implantation of the inverted total shoulder prosthesis Delta. We conclude that reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with the Delta prosthesis is significantly beneficial in terms of less shoulder pain, higher stability and gain of range of motion without this beneficial effect being significantly weakened by previous insufficient shoulder arthroscopy for cuff tear reconstruction. We believe that previous arthroscopic cuff tear reconstruction should therefore be included in the treatment algorithm

Our primary objective was to compare healing rates in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for degenerative tears, with and without bone channeling. Our secondary objectives were to compare disease-specific quality of life and patient reported outcomes as measured by the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and Constant score between groups. Patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair at three sites were randomized to receive either bone channeling augmentation or standard repair. Healing rates were determined by ultrasound at 6 and 24 months post operatively. WORC, ASES, and Constant scores were compared between groups at baseline and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post operatively. One hundred sixty-eight patients were recruited and randomized between 2013 to 2018. Statistically significant improvements occurred in both groups from pre-operative to all time points in all clinical outcome scores (p < 0 .0001). Intention to treat analysis revealed no statistical differences in healing rates between the two interventions at 24 months post-operative. No differences were observed in WORC, ASES or Constant scores at any time-point. This trial did not demonstrate superiority of intra-operative bone channeling in rotator cuff repair surgery at 24 months post-operative. Healing rates and patient-reported function and quality of life measures were similar between groups

It is undetermined which factors predict return to work following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. We aimed to identify which factors predicted return to work at any level, and return to pre-injury levels of work 6 months post-arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Multiple logistic regression analysis of prospectively collected demographic, pre-injury, preoperative, and intraoperative data from 1502 consecutive primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs, performed by a single surgeon, was performed to identify independent predictors of return to work, and return to pre-injury levels of work respectively, 6 months post-surgery. Six months post-rotator cuff repair, 76% of patients returned to work (RTW), and 40% returned to pre-injury levels of work (Full-RTW). RTW at 6 months was likely if patients were still working after their injuries, but prior to surgery (Wald statistic [W]=55, p<0.0001), were stronger in internal rotation preoperatively (W=8, p=0.004), had full-thickness tears (W=9, p=0.002), and were female (W=5, p=0.030). Patients who achieved Full-RTW were likely to have worked less strenuously pre-injury (W=173, p<0.0001), worked more strenuously post-injury but pre-surgery (W=22, p<0.0001), had greater behind-the-back lift-off strength preoperatively (W=8, p=0.004), and had less passive external rotation range of motion preoperatively (W=5, p=0.034). Patients who were still working post-injury, but pre-surgery were 1.6-times more likely to RTW than patients who were not (p<0.0001). Patients who nominated their pre-injury level of work as “light” were 11-times more likely to achieve Full-RTW than those who nominated “strenuous” (p<0.0001). Six months post-rotator cuff repair, a higher patient-rated post-injury, but pre-surgery level of work was the strongest predictor of RTW. A lower patient-rated pre-injury level of work was the strongest predictor of Full-RTW. Greater preoperative subscapularis strength independently predicted both RTW, and Full-RTW

Recent studies on animal models focused on the effect of preserving tendon remnant of rotator cuff on tendon healing. A positive effect by combining tendon remnant preservation and small bone vents on the greater tuberosity in comparison with standard tendon-to-bone repair has been shown. The purpose of the present clinical study was to evaluate the efficacy of biologic augmentation of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair by maintaining tendon remnant on rotator cuff footprint combined with small bone vents of the greater tuberosity. A retrospective study was conducted. All patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair associated with small bone vents (nanofractures) and tendon footprint preservation were considered eligible for the study. Inclusion criteria were: diagnosis of full-thickness rotator cuff tear as diagnosed at preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and confirmed at the time of surgery; minimum 24-month of follow-up and availability of post-operative MRI performed not earlier than 6 months after surgery. Exclusion criteria were: partial thickness tears, irreparable tears, capsulo-labral pathologies, calcific tendonitis, gleno-humeral osteoarthritis and/or previous surgery. Primary outcome was the ASES score. Secondary outcomes were: Quick-DASH and WORC scores, and structural integrity of repaired tendons by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed six months after surgery. A paired t-test was used to compare pre- and postoperative clinical outcomes. Subgroup analysis was performed according to tear size. Significance was set at p < 0.05. The study included 29 patients (M:F = 15:14). Mean age (+ SD) of patients was 61.7 + 8.9 years. Mean follow-up was 27.4 ± 2.3 months. Comparison between pre- and postoperative functional scores showed significant clinical improvement (p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis for tear size showed significant differences in the QuickDASH score (0.04). Particularly, a significant difference in the QuickDASH score could be detected between medium and large tears (p=0.008) as well as medium and massive lesions (p=0.04). No differences could be detected between large and massive tears (p= 0.35). Postoperative imaging showed healed tendons in 21 out of 29 (72%) cases. Preservation of tendon remnant combined with small bone vents in the repair of medium-to-massive full-thickness rotator cuff tears provided significant improvement in clinical outcome compared to baseline conditions with complete structural integrity in 72% of the cases

Tears of the rotator cuff tendons are a very common entity. Despite recent advances in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, the re-tear rate remains high. Thus, new methods to improve healing rates following rotator cuff repair must be sought. The purpose of this prospective randomized double-blind controlled study is to compare the functional outcomes and healing rates of an adjuvant pre-operative bone microfracture technique prior to arthroscopic cuff repair. Patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were randomized to receive either a percutaneous bone microfracture of the supraspinatus footprint or a “soft tissue needling” technique, in which the pin was passed through the peripheral edges of the rotator cuff, five-seven days prior to index surgery, under ultrasound guidance. Follow-ups were completed at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post-operatively. Healing status was determined by ultrasound at 6 and 24 months. The primary objective was to compare the WORC score at 24 months. Secondary objectives included the healing status via ultrasound, the Constant, and the ASES scores. A sample size calculation determined that 90 patients provided 80% power to detect a statistical difference between groups. Baseline demographic data did not differ between groups. No statistical differences were detected in the WORC outcome at any time points (p=0.47, baseline, p=0.60, 3 months, p=0.79, 6 months, p=0.50, 12 months, p=0.54, 24 months). Healing rates did not differ between groups (P=0.34) and no differences were observed in the ASES or Constant Scores at all time-points. Statistically significant improvements occurred in both groups from baseline to all time points in all clinical outcome scores (p < 0 .0001). No statistically significant differences in primary or secondary outcomes were identified between pre-operative bone microfracture and soft tissue needling techniques prior to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. This study does not support pre-operative microfracture as a adjuvant technique prior to arthroscopic cuff repair

Controversy exists regarding the optimal technique for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. No previous comparative trials have reported on the long-term follow-up of single and double row fixation in arthroscopic cuff repair. The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term functional outcomes of single-row and double-row suture techniques for repair of the rotator cuff 10-years post-operatively. Ninety patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were randomized to receive either single-row or double-row repair. The primary objective was to compare the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) score 10-years post-operatively. Secondary objectives included comparison of the Constant, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores and supraspinatus strength between groups. Out of 90 patients originally randomized, 57 returned for the long-term 10-year follow-up. Baseline demographic data did not differ between groups. The WORC score was not significantly different between groups at long-term follow-up (p=0.13). No statistical differences were observed between groups for the Constant (p=0.51), ASES (p=0.48) scores, or strength scores (p=0.93). A significant improvement was observed between pre-operative and the final 10-year follow-up. There were no differences observed in all outcomes between two and 10-years post-operatively. No statistically significant differences in functional or quality of life outcomes were identified between single-row and double-row fixation techniques at long-term follow-up

We performed this systematic overview on the overlapping meta-analyses that analyzed autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as an adjuvant in the repair of rotator cuff tears and identify the studies which provide the current best evidence on this subject and generate recommendations for the same. We conducted independent and duplicate electronic database searches in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects on September 8, 2021, to identify meta-analyses that analyzed the efficacy of PRP as an adjuvant in the repair of rotator cuff tears. Methodological quality assessment was made using Oxford Levels of Evidence, AMSTAR scoring, and AMSTAR 2 grades and used the Jadad decision algorithm to generate recommendations. 20 meta-analyses fulfilling the eligibility criteria were included. The AMSTAR scores of the included studies varied from 6–10 (mean:7.9). All the included studies had critically low reliability in their summary of results due to their methodological flaws according to AMSTAR 2 grades. The initial size of the tear and type of repair performed do not seem to affect the benefit of PRPs. Among the different preparations used, leucocyte poor (LP)-PRP possibly offers the greatest benefit as a biological augment in these situations. Based on this systematic overview, we give a Level II recommendation that intra-operative use of PRPs at the bone-tendon interface can augment the healing rate, reduce re-tears, enhance the functional outcomes and mitigate pain in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Introduction. One of the disadvantages of lateral decubitus position during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is the difficulty to control arm rotation intraoperatively making it necessary to create additional portals for anchor placement or an additional scrubbed assistant to control arm rotation. Methods & Technique. We describe the use of commercially available TRIMANO® support arm from Arthrex as an easy device for secure positioning during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in lateral decubitus position. Though initially marketed to be used for shoulder arthroplasties performed in beach chair position, the senior author has used TRIMANO® to perform arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in lateral decubitus position. The device is easily connected to the operating table side rail while the affected side forearm of the patient is placed in a disposable sterile foam arm holder and attached to the TRIMANO® arm. The “Click and Move” system of the TRIMANO® allows freedom to move the arm in any direction and also provides traction to distract the joint if needed. Conclusion. To conclude TRIMANO® arm is an easy to use flexible device for use in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in lateral decubitus position decreasing the need for additional portals or an additional scrub assistant thereby decreasing the manpower required and cost of surgery

Aim. Acute postoperative infection is reported to occur in 0.3–2% after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Few reports have addressed this dreaded complication although the costs are high both for the patient and for society. The aim of this prospective study was to describe incidence, treatment and outcome after acute postoperative infections following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Method. Patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in our department have been prospectively registered since 2009. 11 out of 1072 patients undergoing surgery developed an acute postoperative infection. The patients were examined with an MRI scan and/or functional scores (Constant Murley (CM) and WORC) at final follow-up. Results. All 11 patients that developed acute postoperative infections were male. Mean age was 54 (41–68) years. Except for male gender, no common underlying predisposing risk factor for infection could be identified. 1/11 patient had diabetes mellitus and 2/11 smoked. Average BMI was 27 (21–36). 1/11 was categorized as ASA 3 and the rest of the patients were ASA 1 and 2. All patients underwent arthroscopic debridement and biopsies were collected 26 (14–50) days after primary surgery. In 10 patients Propionibacterium acnes was cultured, and 6 of these patients also had positive cultures for coagulase negative staphylococci. In the remaining patient only coagulase negative staphylococcus was cultured. 5/11 patients were treated with one arthroscopic debridement, 5/11 had two arthroscopic debridements, whereas 1/11 required arthroscopic debridement four times before the infection was eradicated. Only 2/11 patients had to have their implants removed during the reoperation due to loosening of the suture anchors. All 11 patients were treated with parenteral antibiotics for 7–28 days, followed by oral treatment for 1–5 weeks, and all infections had resolved at final follow-up. Median CM score was 84 and median WORC score was 81% at follow-up median 22(11–28) months. 10 patients had a postoperative MRI scan after median 23 (3–49) months, 8 of them showing a healed cuff repair. Conclusions. Acute postoperative infections after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair can be eradicated with arthroscopic debridement(s) and removal of implants may not be necessary if patency is adequate. Despite the postoperative acute infection our patients presented good functional results and were satisfied at last follow-up

Our objective was to determine the plasma levels of substance P (SP) in patients with postoperative stiffness after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Plasma samples were obtained at 15 months from surgery from 2 groups of patients who underwent arthroscopic repair of a rotator cuff tear. In Group 1, 30 subjects (14 men and 16 women, mean age: 64.6 years, range 47 to 78) with shoulder stiffness 15 months after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were recruited. In Group 2, 30 patients (11 men and 19 women, mean age: 57.8 years, range 45 to 77) were evaluated 15 months after successful arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Immunoassays were performed with commercially available assay kits to detect the plasma levels of SP. The mean plasma levels of SP in patients with postoperative stiffness were significantly greater than those in the control group (81.06 ± 27.76 versus 23.49 ± 5.64, P < 0.05). The plasma concentrations of substance P in patients with shoulder stiffness after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair are higher compared to plasma levels of SP in patients with a good postoperative outcome. The neuronal upregulation of SP shown in the plasma of patients with post operative shoulder stiffness may underlay not only the symptoms of adhesive capsulitis, but also its development

Introduction and Objective. Tranexamic acid (TXA) is used across surgical specialties to reduce perioperative bleeding. It has been shown to be effective in trauma, spinal surgery, and lower limb arthroplasty. The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical effectiveness of TXA in all types of shoulder surgery on bleeding and non-bleeding related outcomes. Materials and Methods. This study was registered prospectively on the PROSPERO database (ref: CRD42020185482). A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating intra-operative use of TXA versus placebo in any type of surgery to the shoulder girdle. Electronic databases searched included MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, and the Cochrane Library. Risk of bias within studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias v2.0 tool and Jadad score. Certainty of findings were reported using the GRADE approach. The primary outcome was total blood loss. Secondary outcomes included patient reported outcome measures, adverse events, and rate of blood transfusion. Results. Eight RCTs were included in the systematic review and data from 7 of these studies pooled in the meta-analysis. A total of 708 patients were randomized across the studies (406 received TXA, 302 received placebo). Studies included patients undergoing anatomic or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, open Latarjet surgery, and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Pooled analysis demonstrated significant reduction in perioperative bleeding with TXA compared to controls; estimated total blood loss (mean difference [MD], −209.66; 95% CI −389.11 to −30.21; p=0.02), and post-operative blood loss (via drain output) (MD, −84.8ml; 95% CI, −140.04 to −29.56; p=0.003). A mean difference in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of 2.93 was noted in favour of TXA (95% CI 0.2 to 5.66; p=0.04). Conclusions. Whilst noting some risk of bias within the studies, TXA was effective in reducing blood loss and pain in shoulder surgery. There may be a benefit of TXA use in both open and arthroscopic shoulder procedures. Larger, low risk of bias, RCTs for specific surgical shoulder procedures are required

Postoperative stiffness (POS) of the shoulder may occur after an apparently successful reconstruction of a rotator cuff tear. The role of the peripheral nervous system in tissue healing has only recently been recognized. We determined the plasma levels of SP in patients with postoperative stiffness after arthroscopic repair of a rotator cuff tear, and compared them with those in patients with a good outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Plasma samples were obtained at 15 months from surgery from 2 groups of patients who underwent arthroscopic repair of a rotator cuff tear. In Group 1, 30 subjects (14 men and 16 women, mean age: 64.6 years, range 47 to 78) with shoulder stiffness 15 months after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were recruited. In Group 2, 30 patients (11 men and 19 women, mean age: 57.8 years, range 45 to 77) were evaluated 15 months after successful arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Immunoassays were performed with commercially available assay kits to detect the plasma levels of SP. Statistical analysis were performed with Wilcoxon Sign Rank test. Significance was set at P< 0.05. The concentrations of the neuropeptide SP in sera were measurable in all patients. Patients with postoperative stiffness had statistically significant greater plasma levels of SP than patients in whom arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tears had resulted in a good outcome (P < 0.05). Postoperative stiffness (POS) of the shoulder may occur after an apparently successful reconstruction of a rotator cuff tear. An increased amount of SP in the subacromial bursa has been correlated with the pain caused by rotator cuff disease. SP stimulates DNA synthesis in fibroblasts, which are the cellular components of the adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. Also, SP is a pain transmitter peptide, and pain may cause a secondary muscular and/or capsular contracture. Our results show that the plasma concentrations of substance P in patients with shoulder stiffness after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair are higher compared to plasma levels of SP in patients with a good postoperative outcome. We cannot determine the cause of POS in our patients, but the findings of this study suggest a possible neuronal role in the pathophysiology of POS after arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tears. The knowledge of the pathophysiological role of sensory nerve peptides in tissue repair in these patients could open new therapeutic options to manage conditions of the musculo-skeletal system with impaired tissue-nervous system interaction

Purpose: Controversy remains regarding the results of all arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs compared to the mini-open approach. The purpose of this study was to perform a comprehensive literature search and meta-analysis of clinical trials comparing the results of all arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs and mini-open rotator cuff repairs with two years of follow-up data. Method: A computerized search of articles published between 1966 and July 2006 was performed using Medline and PubMed. Additionally, a search of abstracts from four major annual meetings each held between 2000 and 2005, was performed to identify Level I to III studies comparing the results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and mini-open repair. Studies that included follow-up of at least two years and included the use of one of four validated functional outcome scores used to study shoulder pathology were included in the present meta-analysis. All outcome scores were normalized to a 100-point scale to allow outcome comparison. Results: Five studies that met the inclusion criteria were identified. There was no difference in functional outcome scores between the arthroscopic and mini-open repair groups. There was a trend toward fewer complications in the arthroscopic repair group, however, this did not meet statistical significance. Conclusion: In studies with at least two years of follow-up data, there was no significant difference in functional outcome scores between the arthroscopic and mini-open rotator cuff repair techniques. The arthroscopic repair technique is a useful and successful alternative to the mini-open repair technique

The purpose of this prospective randomised clinical trial is to examine the effect of acromioplasty on the outcome of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Patients included individuals that were referred for assessment after six months of failed conservative management. Following informed consent patients were randomly assigned to receive arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with or without acromioplasty. The surgeon was not blinded to the type of procedure; however, the researcher who performed the follow-up evaluations and the patient was blinded to the surgical protocol. Subacromial decompression (acromioplasty) was performed with release of the coracoacromial ligament off the anterior undersurface of the acromion. The procedure for arthroscopic cuff repair without acromioplasty followed the protocol of arthroscopic cuff repair with acromioplasty, without division of the coracoacromial ligament or resection of the acromion. Both groups experienced the same post-operative rehabilitation protocol. Wound healing and active and passive range of motion were assessed and recorded at six to eight weeks post-operatively. Subsequent post-operative visits occurred at three, six, twelve, eighteen and twenty-four months and included documentation of patient range of motion, patient derived WORC scores (1) and complete ASES scores. Preliminary results suggest, based on a one-tailed t-test, patients that receive a rotator cuff repair with acromioplasty demonstrate a statistically significant improvement (< 0.05) in Quality of Life, based on WORC and ASES scores, compared to the non-acromioplasty group. To date, three patients in the non-acromioplasty group required a revision surgery; two of these patients had a Type III acromion. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with arthroscopic acromioplasty in the treatment of full thickness rotator cuff tears is recommended for patients with a Type III acromion

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair has evolved significantly in the last decade and has become a standard treatment. Satisfactory results of arthroscopic subacromial decompression (ASD) in the treatment of rotator cuff tears have also been reported (. 1. ). The aim of this study was to compare the outcome following arthroscopic repair versus decompression alone in patients with small & medium rotator cuff tears (Classification of Post, Silver & Singh (. 2. ). There were 114 patients in the ASD group and 96 in the Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair group (RCR). The groups were statistically comparable in terms of patient age & gender. Clinical follow-up was performed at a minimum of 12 months post -operatively (average 36 months). The average Post-op Constant score was 69.8 for the ASD group and 86.4 for the RCR group. The average post-op pain score (S.D) in the ASD group was 10.9 (± 4.3) and in the RCR group was 13.6 (± 3.1). Post operative strength was 7.6 (± 3.6) in the ASD group and 16.7 (± 5.4) in the RCR group.26 patients (22.8%) in the ASD group and 3 (3.3%) of the RCR group required futher surgery. Patient satisfaction (maximum 10 points) was 7.4% in the ASD group and 8.9 (± 1.4) in the RCR. The results of this study support arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Shoulder strength is improved and there is significant reduction in the need for revision surgery

Purpose: The upward migration index (UMI) is a useful radiographic parameter for assessment of disorders of the rotator cuff. Utility of the UMI as a prognostic indicator for outcome following cuff repair has not been previously studied. The objective of this study was to determine if an association exists between the pre-operative UMI and the improvement in clinical and quality of life outcome scores following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Method: Patients with a full thickness tear of the rotator cuff who underwent an arthroscopic repair of the cuff were selected for review. Eighty-four patients were included in the series. Mean patient age was 55 (range 25–78). The UMI was measured by MRI, and patients were divided into three groups: < 1.25 (GROUP A), 1.25–1.35 (GROUP B) and > 1.35 (GROUP C). Outcome variables were the non-weighted Constant-Murley score, ASES and the WORC assessed at baseline, 6 month and 12 months post-operatively. The paired t-test was used to carry out comparisons in follow up and one-way ANOVA was used to carry out comparisons between groups. Results: There were 9 patients in group A, 33 in group B and 42 in group C. The improvement in scores from baseline to 1 year were as follows: ASES; 21.1 (A), 32.6 (B), and 38.4 (C); Constant 21.4 (A) 19.8 (B), and 24.2 (C) and WORC 31.9 (A), 42.7 (B), and 44 (C). Statistically significant improvements were observed in all groups in all outcome measures from baseline to 6 months and from 6 months to 1 year. Although the differences were not statistically significant (p> 0.05), a trend toward greater improvement in outcomes was observed with higher upward migration indices. Conclusion: A lower UMI was associated with less improvement in functional and quality of life outcomes following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, although these differences were not statistically significant. Patients with a low UMI demonstrated a significant improvement in functional and quality of life scores following surgery. In isolation, a low UMI should not represent a significant contraindication to treatment by arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Objectives. The aim of this study was to determine whether there is any significant difference in temporal measurements of pain, function and rates of re-tear for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) patients compared with those patients undergoing open RCR. Methods. This study compared questionnaire- and clinical examination-based outcomes over two years or longer for two series of patients who met the inclusion criteria: 200 open RCR and 200 arthroscopic RCR patients. All surgery was performed by a single surgeon. . Results. Most pain measurements were similar for both groups. However, the arthroscopic RCR group reported less night pain severity at six months, less extreme pain and greater satisfaction with their overall shoulder condition than the open RCR group. The arthroscopic RCR patients also had earlier recovery of strength and range of motion, achieving near maximal recovery by six months post-operatively whereas the open RCR patients took longer to reach the same recovery level. The median operative times were 40 minutes (20 to 90) for arthroscopic RCR and 60 minutes (35 to 120) for open RCR. Arthroscopic RCR had a 29% re-tear rate compared with 52% for the open RCR group (p < 0.001). . Conclusions. Arthroscopic RCR involved less extreme pain than open RCR, earlier functional recovery, a shorter operative time and better repair integrity

Purpose of the study: Platelet rich fibrin (PRF) favours proliferation of tenocytes and synthesis of extracellular matrix. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the technical feasibility of adding a PRF envelope during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair to favour short-term vascularisation of the tendon-trochiter zone vascularization. Material and method: Twenty patients aged over 55 years with a posterosuperior rotator cuff tear were included in this prospective randomized controlled study. The double strand technique was used for all patients. Patients were selected at random for insertion of a PRF envelope between the tendon and the trochiter. There were thus two groups of ten patients. The SSV, SST, VAS and Constant scores were noted. Vascularization was assessed with Power Doppler ultrasound at 6 weeks and 3 months by an independent operator unaware of the study group. Results: There were no complications during or after the operations. Postoperatively, all patients increased their SSV, SST, VAS and Constant scores significantly. Vascularization of the tendon-trochiter zone, as assessed by Power Doppler, was significantly higher in the PRF group at 6 weeks. It was unchanged in the two groups at 3 months. Discussion: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with adjunction of a PRF envelope is technically feasible and increases vascularizaton of the tendon-trochiter zone at 6 weeks. Conclusion: PRF can improve the tendon healing rate for rotator cuff tears

Purpose. Controversy exists regarding the optimal technique for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The purpose of this multicentre randomized double-blind controlled study was to compare the functional outcomes and healing rates of double-row suture techniques with single row repair. Method. Patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were randomized to receive either a double row (DR) or single row (SR) repair. The primary objective was to compare the WORC score at 24 months. Secondary objectives included anatomical outcomes by MRI or ultrasound, the Constant, and ASES scores. A sample size calculation determined that 84 patients provided 80% power with a 50% effect size to detect a statistical difference between groups. Results. Baseline demographic data did not differ between groups including age (p=0.4), sex (p=0.71), affected side (p=0.33) and cuff tear size (p=0.95). WORC outcome comparison between groups revealed that no statistical differences were detected at any time points (p=0.9, baseline; p=0.15, 3 months; p=0.41, 6 months; p=0.46, 12 months, p=0.42, 24 months). Statistically significant improvements occurred in both groups from baseline to all time points in all clinical outcome scores (p<0.0001). Conclusion. No statistically significant differences in primary or secondary outcomes were identified between DR and SR techniques. Given the added time to complete the procedures and the added cost of additional implants, this trial does not provide justification for use of the more complex repair technique

Introduction. Rotator cuff healing after an arthroscopic repair is discussible because of the high incidence of failures. Among biologic augmentations currently used, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is one of the most applied, supposed to enhance and accelerate the healing process in different musculoskeletal disorders. However, the evidence supporting its successful administration is still lacking, especially in the field of the rotator cuff repair. Our purpose is to clarify if the recovery is accelerated and the integrity of repaired construct is increased in patients undergoing PRP injections after arthroscopic repair of the rotator cuff. Patients & Methods. Thirty-eight patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears have been enrolled after they had been informed about the use of PRP and the timing of its application postoperatively. Seventeen patients underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and PRP injections (3 injections at 10 days each other), 21 underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair without PRP injections. Outcomes were assessed preoperatively, at 3, 6, 12, and minimum 16 months after surgery (average 17.7 +/− 1.7 months). Constant system, the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) system and a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scale were used; range of motion and strength in all planes were also assessed. The healing of the repair was assessed at magnetic resonance imaging at a minimum follow up of 6 months from surgery. All patients had the same rehabilitation protocol. Results. Platelet-rich plasma gel application after to arthroscopic rotator cuff tear repairs did not accelerate recovery with respect to pain, range of motion, strength, functional scores, or overall satisfaction as compared with conventional repair at any time point. There was no difference between the 2 groups after 3, 6, 12, months and at final follow up. The follow-up MRI showed no significant difference in the healing rate of the rotator cuff tear. In addition, magnetic resonance imaging, at a minimum of 6 months after surgery, demonstrated a retear rate of 23.5 % in the PRP group and 19% in the conventional group, there was no statistical significance between the groups (P = .658). Discussion/Conclusion. Although PRP application after arthroscopic repair of the rotator cuff has no effects on clinical recovery and structural integrity, it reduces the postoperative occurrence of shoulder stiffness. Further studies should support these findings