Background: Although the clinical relevance still remains unclear there is an increased interest in the incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) following posterior spinal scoliosis surgery. Several authors suppose patients with hybrid instrumentation (cranial laminar hooks, caudal pedicle screws and sublaminar wires) to be at greater risk for developing PJK. The aim of our study was to evaluate the incidence of PJK and to determine risk factors in our series of AIS patients with hybrid instrumentation after a minimum follow up of 5 years. Methods: 60 consecutive AIS patients (56 female, 4 male, average age 16 years, range 14 to 18 years) underwent scoliosis surgery using pedicle screws caudal and laminar hooks cranial at our institution. Pre - and postoperative Cobb angle, junctional kyphosis angle, number of fused levels and upper instrumented vertebra were assessed on lateral and anteriorposterior standing long cassette radiographs after an average follow up of 8 years (range 5 to 12 years). As published by Glattes et al. proximal junction was defined as the caudal end-plate of the upper instrumented vertebra to the cranial endplate two vertebrae proximal. A Cobb angle of the proximal junction greater than 10° and at least 10° greater than preoperative was defined abnormal. Results: Average number of fused levels was 10.2 (range 8.1 to 12.3). Average Cobb angle decreased from pre-operative 65° (range 50° to 80°) to 32° (range 22° to 40°). T 4 was the upper instrumented vertebra in 30 patients, T 5 in 18 and below T 6 in 12 patients. Average Preoperative saggital PJK Cobb was 7° (range 4° to 13°). 5 patients (12%) showed abnormal proximal junctional kyphosis angel at latest follow up (average 18°, range 14 to 28°). There was no positive correlation found between upper instrumented vertebra and abnormal PJK (r. 2. = 0.01). A greater preoperative PJK angle however showed positive correlation (r. 2. = 0.8). Conclusion: Compared to literature our data show a low rate (12%) of PJK after an average follow up of 8 years. We could not find any positive correlation between upper instrumented vertebra and incidence of PJK, a preoperative increased proximal kyphosis however seems to be a risk factor for developing PJK

Our prospective observational study of patients treated for Thoracolumbar Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) by anterior instrumentation aimed at investigating the correlation between the radiographic outcome and the recently-developed scoliosis research society self-reported outcomes instrument (SRS-22) which has been validated as a tool for self-assessment in scoliosis patients. Previous patient based questionnaires demonstrated poor correlation with the radiological parameters. Materials and Methods. Pre-operative, post-operative and two years follow-up radiographs of 30 patients were assessed. Thirteen radiographic parameters including Cobb angles and balance were recorded. The percentage improvements for each were noted. The SRS-22 questionnaire was completed by all patients at final follow-up. Correlation was sought between each radiographic parameter, total SRS score and each of the five domains by quantifying Pearson's Correlation Coefficient (r). Results. Percentage improvement in primary Cobb angle (r = 0.052), secondary Cobb angle (r = 0.165), apical vertebra translation of the primary curve (r = -0.353), thoracic kyphosis (r = 0.043) and lumbar lordosis (r = 0.147) showed little or no correlation with the SRS-22 total score and its five individual domains. Significant inverse correlation was found between the upper instrumented vertebra angle and at follow-up and SRS-22 (r = -0.516). The same was true for Sagittal plumb line shift at final follow up (r = -0.447). Conclusion. SRS-22 is a validated tool for the self-assessment of health status in spinal deformity patients; however, it does not seem to correlate with most of the radiographic parameters commonly used by clinicians to assess patient outcome with the exception of upper instrumented vertebra angle and sagittal plumb line which do correlate significantly with the SRS-22 outcomes instrument. A comprehensive system of assessing the success of surgery both from the patient and clinicians perspective is required in the spinal deformity patient

Introduction: Patient questionnaires permit a direct measure of the value of care as perceived by the recipient. The Scoliosis Research Society outcomes questionnaire (SRS-22) has been validated as a tool for self-assessment. We investigated the correlation between SRS-22 and a detailed radiological outcome two years following anterior correction of Thoraco-Lumbar Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (TL-AIS). Methods: The SRS-22 questionnaire was completed by 30 patients two years following anterior correction of TL-AIS. Pre-operative, post-operative and two year follow-up radiographs of all 30 patients were assessed. The following parameters were measured at each time point:. Primary Cobb angle,. Secondary Cobb angle,. Coronal C7-midsacral plumb line,. Apical Vertebra Translation (AVT) of primary curve,. AVT of the secondary curve,. Upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) translation,. UIV tilt angle,. Lower instrumented vertebra (LIV), 8) LIV tilt angle. Apical Vertebra Rotation (AVR) of the primary curve,. Sagittal C7-posterior corner of sacrum plumb line. T5-T12 angle,. T12-S1 angle,. shoulder height difference. The percentage improvements for each were noted. Correlation was sought between Total SRS score, each of the five individual domains and various radiographic parameters listed above by quantifying Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient (r). Results: Percentage improvement in primary Cobb angle (r = 0.052), secondary Cobb angle (r = 0.165) and AVT of the primary curve (r = −0.353) showed little or no correlation with the SRS-22 total score or any of its five domains. Significant inverse correlation was found between the UIV tilt angle at two years and the SRS-22 (r = −0.516). Lateral radiographs however showed little or no correlation between thoracic kyphosis (r = 0.043) and SRS-22. Conclusion: The SRS-22 outcomes questionnaire does not correlate with most of the radiographic parameters commonly used by clinicians to assess patient outcome

Introduction: Patient questionnaires permit a direct measure of the value of care as perceived by the recipient. The Scoliosis Research Society outcomes questionnaire (SRS-22) has been validated as a tool for self-assessment. We investigated the correlation between SRS-22 and a detailed radiological outcome two-years following anterior correction of ThoracoLumbar Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (TL-AIS). Methods: The SRS-22 questionnaire was completed by 30 patients two-years following anterior correction of TL-AIS. Pre-operative, post-operative and two-year follow-up radiographs of all 30 patients were assessed. The following parameters were measured at each time point: 1) Primary Cobb angle, 2) Secondary Cobb angle, 3) Coronal C7-midsacral plumb line, 4) Apical Vertebra Translation (AVT) of primary curve, 5) AVT of the secondary curve, 6) Upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) translation, 7) UIV tilt angle, 8) Lower instrumented vertebra (LIV), 8) LIV tilt angle 9) Apical Vertebra Rotation (AVR) of the primary curve, 10) Sagittal C7-posterior corner of sacrum plumb line 11) T5–T12 angle, 12) T12-S1 angle, 13) shoulder height difference. The percentage improvements for each were noted. Correlation was sought between Total SRS score, each of the five individual domains and various radiographic parameters listed above by quantifying Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient (r). Results: Percentage improvement in primary Cobb angle (r = 0.052), secondary Cobb angle (r = 0.165) and AVT of the primary curve (r = −0.353) showed little or no correlation with the SRS-22 total score or any of its five domains. Significant inverse correlation was found between the UIV tilt angle at two years and the SRS-22 (r = −0.516). Lateral radiographs however showed little or no correlation between thoracic kyphosis (r = 0.043) and SRS-22. Conclusion: The SRS-22 outcomes questionnaire does not correlate with most of the radiographic parameters commonly used by clinicians to assess patient outcome

Aims

High-grade dysplastic spondylolisthesis is a disabling disorder for which many different operative techniques have been described. The aim of this study is to evaluate Scoliosis Research Society 22-item (SRS-22r) scores, global balance, and regional spino-pelvic alignment from two to 25 years after surgery for high-grade dysplastic spondylolisthesis using an all-posterior partial reduction, transfixation technique.