Reconstruction of an acetabulum following severe bone loss can be challenging. The aim of this study was to determine the outcome of acetabular reconstruction performed using trabecular metal shell for severe bone loss. Between June 2003 and June 2006 a total of 29 patients with significant acetabular bone stock deficiency underwent revisions using trabacular metal shell. According to Paprosky classification, there were 18 patients with grade IIIA and 11 patients with grade IIIB defects. Nineteen patients required augments to supplement the defects. Functional clinical outcomes were measured by WOMAC and Oxford hip. Detailed radiological assessments were also made. At most recent follow up (average 5.5 years, range 3.5–8.5) the mean Oxford hip score improved from 12 preoperatively to 27.11 postoperatively and WOMAC score from 17.57 preoperatively to 34.14 postoperatively The osseointegration was 83% according to Moore's classification. There were two reoperations; one was for instability, and one for aseptic loosening. One patient has a chronic infection and one had a periprosthetic fracture, both treated conservatively. Despite challenges faced with severe preoperative acetabular defects the early results using this technique in Grade III A and B is encouraging

Introduction: Trabecular Metal (Tantalum) has been successfully used in Neurosurgery for many years. Acetabular components have only been available in the UK since 2004. The metal’s properties of porosity and a high friction coefficient are attractive, particularly in complex primary and revision hip arthroplasty when surgical challenges include abnormal, deficient or limited bone.

Methods: Two year results of 110 consecutive acetabular reconstructions are presented. The age range was between 27 and 95 years with a predominance of females. The indication in 75 primary hip replacements included, Destructive Osteoarthritis, Dysplasia, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Paget’s and AVN. 35 revisions were performed either two-component or single acetabular exchanges.

Clinical results have been obtained using the Merle d’Aubigne score and bone deficiencies were classified according to the AAOS system.

Results: There have been no failures and radiologically, serial X-rays demonstrate osseo-integration at an early stage.

We have had no cases of deep infection but there have been 3 femoral peri-prosthetic fractures, (1 late) and 2 dislocations.

All patients have been allowed early weight bearing and those patients with over 12 months follow up have an improved Merle d’Aubigne score.

Discussion: The biomechanical properties of Trabecular metal and a modular design permit a press fit technique supplemented by dome screws combined with the possibility of using varying sizes of liner to minimise dislocation or to retain well fixed femoral stems in revision surgery.

The ease of use of the implant has now led to us largely abandoning other reconstructive techniques such as impaction allo-grafting or cages in revision or complex primary hip surgery.

We consider Trabecular metal to be a major advance in acetabular reconstruction on the basis of our initial experience

Pelvic discontinuity is a separation through the acetabulum with the ilium displacing superiorly and the ischium/pubis displacing inferiorly. This is a biomechanically challenging environment with a high rate of failure for standard acetabular components. The cup-cage reconstruction involves the use of a highly porous metal cup to achieve biological bone ingrowth on both sides of the pelvic discontinuity and an ilioischial cage to provide secure fixation across the discontinuity and bring the articulating hip center to the correct level. The purpose of this study was to report long term follow up of the use of the cup-cage to treat pelvic discontinuity. All hip revision procedures between January 2003 and January 2022 where a cup-cage was used for a hip with a pelvic discontinuity were included in this retrospective review. All patients received a Trabecular Metal Revision Shell with either a ZCA cage or TMARS cage (Zimmer-Biomet Inc.). Pelvic discontinuity was diagnosed on pre-operative radiographs and/or intraoperatively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed with failure defined as revision of the cup-cage reconstruction. Fifty-seven cup-cages in 56 patients were included with an average follow-up of 6.25 years (0.10 to 19.98 years). The average age of patients was 72.09 years (43 to 92 years) and 70.2% of patients were female. The five year Kaplan-Meier survival was 92.0% (95% CI 84.55 to 99.45) and the ten year survival was 80.5% (95% CI 58.35 to 102.65). There were 5 major complications that required revision of the cup-cage reconstruction (3 infections and 2 mechanical failures). There were 9 complications that required re-operation without revision of the cup-cage reconstruction (5 dislocations, 3 washouts for infection and one femoral revision for aseptic loosening). In our hands the cup-cage reconstruction has provided a reliable tool to address pelvic discontinuity with an acceptable complication rate

Introduction: Porous Tantalum has been used in a variety of clinical settings since 1997. The use of trabecular metal backed prostheses and augments in the revision hip scenario is attractive due to the higher propensity of bony ingrowth than traditional porous coatings, and also the high coefficient of friction with bone leads to excellent press fit. We describe the early results of twenty trabecular metal backed acetabular components in the revision setting. Methods: From 2004, 20 patients received trabecular metal backed acetabular components as a revision hip procedure. The average age of the patients was 69 (42–84) yrs at the time of surgery. 4 patients had trabecular metal shells with cemented liners, 16 patients had modular trabecular metal implants. Structural allograft was used in 2 cases, trabcular metal augment in 1. Revision was for aseptic loosening in 17 cases, infection in 3. Acetabular defects were graded according to Paprosky as 2A(10), 2B(1), 2C(1), 3A(6) and 3B(2). Fixation was augmented in all cups with at least one screw. Patients were evaluated with standard x-rays for osteolysis and migration, Harris hip score, SF 36 and Oxford hip score. Results: Average follow up was 12 months (24–5). 100% follow up was achieved. There were no complications directly related to the acetabular surgery. There were no revisions. There are no progressive radiolucencies or detectable migration in any of the cups. There were no dislocations. Conclusion: These early results suggest that trabecular metal backed acetabular components may be confidently used in the setting of hip revision surgery and show promise for the more severe defects for which a reliably reproducible solution has yet to be proven