There have been few reports with efficient treatments for neglected distal tibiofibular syndesmosis disruption. Here we will report four cases of successful anatomical reconstruction with autologous gracilis tendon, using the interference fit anchoring (IFA) system. All four cases were males between 20 and 58 years of age at the time of surgery (mean age 36 years). The post-injury period to surgery was between 7 and 59 months (mean 20.1 months), with the consultation period being from 5 to 19 months (mean 9.5 months). Radiographs at the time of injuries were all malleolar fractures of pronation-external rotation (PE) stage 3 in the Lauge-Hansen classification. Stress tests for distal tibiofibular syndesmosis were positive in all cases (dilation more than 2 mm). Arthroscopic drilling was conducted in two cases with a cartilaginous injury of trochlea of talus. Distal tibiofibular syndesmosis was anatomically repositioned and was fixed with screws after bony and soft tissues within the tibiofibular syndesmosis were removed and fibular adhesion was dissected. Ipsilateral autologous gracilis tendon was passed through foramen in the insertion of the anterior inferior tibiofibular tendon on tibia and fibula, and was fixated using the IFA system. The preoperative Japanese society for surgery of the foot (JSSF) score was from 26 to 74 points (mean 43.5) and postoperative JSSF score was from 67 to 100 (mean 89.5). In a case where there was a poor outcome, five years of post injury had passed before the surgery. Although the JSSF score improved to 67 points postoperatively (from the preoperative score of 26) in this case, arthroscopic arthrodesis was conducted 5 months postoperatively due to persistent pain. Anatomical reconstruction with autologous gracilis tendon using the IFA system showed a favorable functional prognosis overall. However, there was a case with progressive degenerated changes of injured distal tibiofibular syndesmosis due to a prolonged post-injury period resulted in a poor outcome

Aims. Tibial plateau fractures (TPFs) are complex injuries around the knee caused by high- or low-energy trauma. In the present study, we aimed to define the distribution and frequency of TPF lines using a 3D mapping technique and analyze the rationalization of divisions employed by frequently used classifications. Methods. In total, 759 adult patients with 766 affected knees were retrospectively reviewed. The TPF fragments on CT were multiplanar reconstructed, and virtually reduced to match a 3D model of the proximal tibia. 3D heat mapping was subsequently created by graphically superimposing all fracture lines onto a tibia template. Results. The cohort included 405 (53.4%) cases with left knee injuries, 347 (45.7%) cases with right knee injuries, and seven (0.9%) cases with bilateral injuries. On mapping, the hot zones of the fracture lines were mainly concentrated around the anterior cruciate ligament insertion, posterior cruciate ligament insertion, and the inner part of the lateral condyle that extended to the junctional zone between Gerdy’s tubercle and the tibial tubercle. Moreover, the cold zones were scattered in the posteromedial fragment, superior tibiofibular syndesmosis, Gerdy’s tubercle, and tibial tubercle. TPFs with different Orthopaedic Trauma Association/AO Foundation (OTA/AO) subtypes showed peculiar characteristics. Conclusion. TPFs occurred more frequently in the lateral and intermedial column than in the medial column. Fracture lines of tibial plateau occur frequently in the transition zone with marked changes in cortical thickness. According to 3D mapping, the four-column and nine-segment classification had a high degree of matching as compared to the frequently used classifications. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2020;9(6):258–267

The April 2012 Foot & Ankle Roundup. 360 . looks at injecting the tendon sheath, total ankle replacement, heterotopic ossification, replacement or arthrodesis, achilles tendinopathy, healing of the torn Achilles, grafting of the calcaneal bone cyst, avulsion fractures in athletes, percutaneous distal osteotomy for bunionette formation, and repairing the torn tibiofibular syndesmosis

Background. Ankle fractures are often associated with ligamentous injuries of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis, the deltoid ligament and are predictive of ankle instability, early joint degeneration and long-term ankle dysfunction. Detection of ligamentous injuries and the need for treatment remain subject of ongoing debate. In the classic article of Boden it was made clear that injuries of the syndesmotic ligaments were of no importance in the absence of a deltoid ligament rupture. Even in the presence of a deltoid ligament rupture, the interosseous membrane withstood lateralization of the fibula in fractures up to 4.5mm above the ankle joint. Generally, syndesmotic ligamentous injuries are treated operatively by temporary fixation performed with positioning screws. But do syndesmotic injuries need to be treated operatively at all?. Methods. The purpose of this biomechanical cadaveric study was to investigate the relative movements of the tibia and fibula, under normal physiological conditions and after sequential sectioning of the syndesmotic ligaments. Ten fresh-frozen below-knee human cadaveric specimens were tested under normal physiological loading conditions. Axial loads of 50 Newton (N) and 700N were provided in an intact state and after sequential sectioning of the following ligaments: anterior-inferior tibiofibular (AITFL), posterior-inferior tibiofibular (PITFL), interosseous (IOL), and whole deltoid (DL). In each condition the specimens were tested in neutral position, 10 degrees of dorsiflexion, 30 degrees of plantar flexion, 10 degrees of inversion, 5 degrees of eversion, and externally rotated up to 10Nm torque. Finally, after sectioning of the deltoid ligament, we triangulated Boden's classic findings with modern instruments. We hypothesized that only after sectioning of the deltoid ligament; the lateralization of the talus will push the fibula away from the tibia. Results. During dorsiflexion and external rotation the ankle syndesmosis widened, and the fibula externally rotated after sequential sectioning of the syndesmotic ligaments. After the AITFL was sectioned the fibula starts rotating externally. However, the external rotation of the fibula significantly reduced when the external rotation torque was combined with axial loading up to 700N as compared to the external rotation torque alone. The most relative moments between the tibia and fibula were observed after the deltoid ligament was sectioned. Conclusion. Significant increases in movements of the fibula relative to the tibia occur when an external rotation torque is provided. However, axial pressure seemed to limit external rotation because of the bony congruence of the tibiotalar surface. The AITFL is necessary to prevent the fibula to rotate externally when the foot is rotating externally. The deltoid ligament is the main stabilizer of the ankle mortise

Introduction. It is recommended that the ankle be held in dorsiflexion at the time of placement of syndesmosis screw. We assessed the validity of this recommendation. Materials and methods. A two-part roentgenographic and computerised analysis of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. The first part involved recruitment of 30 healthy adult volunteers. The second part involved 15 ankle fractures with syndesmotic injury requiring syndesmosis screw placement. In the first part individuals maximally dorsiflexed and plantarflexed their ankles in a specialised jig for standardisation. Mortice views were taken and intermalleolar distance measured. In the second part mortice views were taken in plantarflexion and dorsiflexion before and after the placement of syndesmosis screw in theatre. The intermalleolar distance was then measured. Results. In both parts of the study we found the change in intermalleolar distance between the positions of plantarflexion and dorsiflexion was not more than 0.9 mm. This change is significantly less than the calculated difference between the anterior and posterior talar body width of 3-5 mm. Conclusion. This study shows that the width of ankle mortice is independent of the position of the talus occupying it and hence dorsiflexion of the ankle at the time of syndesmosis screw placement is totally unwarranted

Ankle fractures are one of the most common bony injuries presenting to the trauma surgeon. The more severe ones result in disruption of the tibiofibular syndesmosis and hence worse outcome. The outcome depends on accurate reduction of syndesmosis. The two main options in managing these injuries are syndesmotic screws or tightrope. The aim of this study is to compare the rate of complications between these two techniques and their radiographic results. Retrospective data from 62 patients between September 2009 and March 2011 who had fixation of syndesmosis was obtained from theatre logbooks. 46 patients had syndesmotic screws inserted while 16 had tightrope. The average age was comparable in both groups (51 years v/s 41). 25 of the 46 syndesmotic screws inserted were removed. No tightropes had to be removed for any reason. 2 patients with syndesmotic screws had wound complications while 1 patient which tightrope insertion had a persistent diastasis. There were no differences in radiological outcome between the two groups with regards to reduction of syndesmosis (measured by talofibular clear space minus medial clear space) (p-value 0.283). The difference between the talocrural angles was also of no significance (p-value 0.344). Our results indicate that tightropes achieve radiologically similar reduction of syndesmosis as screws without any significant difference in complications. The need for a second operation is significantly lower with tightrope fixation

Three cases of patients affected with massive bone defects are reported, in which over 50% of the segments are involved. The treatment options considered were original and not yet described in literature. The patients were affected with: partial agenesia of the tibia, congenital hypoplasia and pseudoarthrosis of the femur, and massive post-traumatic bone defect. In all these cases the Ilizarov’s method was applied. In the first case, instead of carrying out an osteotomy and callotasis of the residual bone tissue, an osteotomy was performed close to the tibiofibular syndesmosis and a distraction at this level was executed. In the second case of pseudoarthrosis with antecurvatum of the proximal femur of 135°, varus of 100°, length discrepancy of 63%, a multiplanar gradual correction of the proximal deformity of the femur was carried out followed by a distal lengthening. The third case concerning the pluri-fragmented exposed diaphyseal fracture of the tibia and fibula, with massive bone loss, was treated by restoring all the small fragments, even those without periosteal connections, to increase the proximal and distal bone mass. Once the fusion of the fragments occurred, a proximal osteotomy and callotasis was performed to rejoin the fracture’s segments

Outcomes following total ankle replacement (TAR) have been less favorable than hip and knee arthroplasty. The Mobility TAR is a newly introduced mobile bearing ankle prosthesis which, unlike its predecessor the Agility, does not require fusion of the tibiofibular syndesmosis which in theory should reduce the rate of early failure. No studies have been published yet reporting follow-up longer than 1 year after surgery with this prosthesis. From June 2006 to May 2008, 50 Mobility TARs were performed in our unit. Data have been collected prospectively on all 50 patients and all have been reviewed annually since surgery. Follow up ranges from one to three years. The mean age was 65 (range 35–79). 20 patients (40%) were male. 10 underwent additional concurrent procedures (six calcaneal osteotomies, one 1st metatarsal osteotomy, two lateral ligament reconstructions, one subtalar arthrodesis). There was one early wound breakdown which subsequently healed without causing deep infection. There were no malleolar fractures. In two prostheses the talar component has subsided over two years resulting in painful loosening. Interestingly both these patients had postraumatic osteoarthritis with a fibular malunion. Both have been listed for revision to arthrodesis. One further patient has a loose talar component without subsidence and is awaiting exploration with a view to revision. There was one deep infection presenting at 18 months. One further patient reports continued hindfoot pain, thought to be from the subtalar joint and is being worked up for arthrodesis. The mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society scores (scale 10–100) increased from 30 to 69 scores following surgery. TAR using the Mobility prosthesis gives good early clinical results. Further follow-up studies are required to see if this performance is maintained in the long term

Introduction and Aims: To assess the efficacy of fibular osteotomy on the rate of arthrodesis at the tibiofibular syndesmosis in patients with Total Ankle Replacement (TAR). Method: A prospective trial of fibular osteotomy was performed in 16 consecutive TAR (13F/3M), mean age 67 (41–82). All operations were performed by the same surgeon, as described by the inventor of the procedure, Dr. Frank Alvine, MD. After completion of the syndesmotic fusion, the fibula was exposed proximal to the proximal syndesmotic screw. An oblique osteotomy of the fibula was performed. Importantly, the angle of the cut was made such that the proximal fibula was trapped by the distal cut surface. The osteotomy was directed from medial distal to lateral proximal. All cases were followed until radiographic and clinical signs of healing were seen. Results: Union occurred in all cases, with a mean time to fusion of seven weeks, with six patients achieving union within five weeks. No patient developed pain at the osteotomy site. All osteotomies showed signs of radiographic healing and none of these were symptomatic. There were no neuromas related to this procedure, and no patient experienced sensory changes along the nerve distribution. One patient developed symptomatic prominence of the screw on the medial malleolus and was asypmtomatic after implant removal. Conclusion: The addition of a fibular osteotomy resulted in a 100% rate of syndesmosis fusion. We postulate that the osteotomy is successful because it removes the micromotion at the syndesmosis, which occurs with loading of the intact fibula. As the fibula only functions as a lateral strut in patients with an Agility total ankle, we felt that the osteotomy would cause minimal if any concerns. Our findings corroborate our hypothesis in that all the fusions were successful and none of the patients experienced secondary problems related to the osteotomy. We would recommend this technique as an adjunct to standard ankle replacement using the Agility system

Ankle sprains in the athlete are one of the most common injuries, and syndesmosis type sprains seem to becoming diagnosed at an increasing rate. There still exists a paucity of information on optimal conservative and operative management. Treatment. Because of the spectrum of injury, there is a spectrum of treatment. if there is mortise widening, operative stabilization is required. if the mortise is normal, even with external rotation stress test positive, conservative treatment has been employed. staged conservative regimen directed at reducing pain and swelling acutely, at regaining range of motion and strength subacutely, and then progressed to functional training and finally return to sport. The timeframe for these was in the range of 2 to 6 weeks without very specific progression criteria. In the athlete, pain with rotational stress, greater severity of sprain, may treat operatively to stabilize the syndesmosis and aggressive rehab with earlier return to sport. Tightrope vs screw fixation vs both. Use of arthroscopy. Chronic sprains with recalcitrant pain and functional instability usually require operative treatment. very poor evidence exists as to the timing or type of procedure. Arthroscopy is required to confirm the diagnosis, treat intraarticular problems, and provide fixation of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. The postoperative regimen used is generally the same as the one used when treating an acute syndesmosis disruption. Tight rope vs Screw Fixation. clinical studies tightrope fixation has been acceptable and comparable to screw fixation. laboratory studies demonstrate comparable construct stability in the laboratory/cadaveric setting. indications for tightrope fixation are becoming more clear with more experience. my indications:. syndesmotic sprains with complete or incomplete disruption. fractures with syndesmotic disruption augment with screws, leave in place following screw removal. Summary and Controversies. Syndesmotic or high ankle sprains continue to be a common injury that result in significant time lost from sport. The conclusion that can be drawn from the current evidence is that the current diagnostic process probably fails to clearly assess the severity of the injury, which reduces the likelihood of accurately predicting the time lost from sport. Syndesmosis sprains can be a significant injuries that result in an inability to play sports for significant periods of time(up to 137 days). We need to be able to identify the more severe ones earlier in order to improve their treatment, perhaps lead to operative stabilization. Tightrope fixation avoids screw removal, minimally invasive, permanent stabilization

Aims

The aim of this study was to investigate whether on-demand removal (ODR) is noninferior to routine removal (RR) of syndesmotic screws regarding functional outcome.

Ankle replacements have improved significantly since the first reported attempt at resurfacing of the talar dome in 1962. We are now at a stage where ankle replacement offers a viable option in the treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis. As the procedure becomes more successful, it is important to reflect and review the current surgical outcomes. This allows us to guide our patients in the treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis. What is the better surgical treatment – arthrodesis or replacement?