Thromboprophylaxis for venous thromboembolism (VTE) after elective arthroplasty remains controversial. Previous surveys have shown considerable variation amongst orthopaedic surgeons, and the topic is still being debated. Chest physicians recently advocated that randomised data demonstrating a risk reduction with long- established thromboprophylaxis have been ignored by orthopaedic surgeons. We present the current thromboprophylaxis practice amongst AOA members performing elective hip and knee replacements and discuss its rationale. All orthopaedic surgeons in the AOA were asked to complete a one page postal questionnaire asking for information regarding: whether they performed elective hip or knee arthroplasty, which methods of mechanical and/or chemical prophylaxis were routinely used, the time frame in ceasing thromboprophylaxis, the motive in using thromboprophylaxis, and whether thromboprophylaxis guidelines released by the AOA or RACS would be helpful in their orthopaedic practice. Responses from the survery are currently being collected and analysed. These results will be ready for presentation at the AOA conference. The results of the survey will be presented in addition to a discussion of the rationale behind current use of post-operative thromboprophylaxis for elective hip and knee arthroplasty and a need for clinical guidelines

Aims. Thromboprophylaxis following Total Hip Replacement (THR) surgery remains controversial, balancing VTE prevention against wound leakage and subsequent deep infection. We analysed the 90 day cause of death post THR in our institution after the implementation of new thromboprophylactic policy of low dose aspirin for low risk patients, as part of a multimodal regime. Those at high risk were anticoagulated. Patients and methods. The PAS database was used to identify patients undergoing primary THR between January 2012 and June 2017 at The Royal Derby Hospital, and all deaths within 90 days. Trauma cases were excluded. Case note review and Coroner's verdict were utilised to ascertain cause of death. Results were compared to a previous study at the same institution prior to the introduction of the new policy, where thromboprophylaxis was decided upon by surgeon preference for either LMWH, aspirin or warfarin. Results. During this period 4021 THRs were performed. The rate of mortality was 0.22% at 90 days. This compares to 0.58% in the previous study with the only other factor changing being the rapidity of post op mobilization. Of the 9 deaths, only one was due to fatal pulmonary embolism. None of the deaths were at high risk of VTE. This compared to 5 fatal pulmonary embolism deaths in1838 patients in the previous study in the LMWH group. The leading causes of death were heart failure and lower respiratory tract infection. Conclusion. Our institution reports a similar 90 day (0.22%) mortality using aspirin to that in the last 5 years on the NJR (0.3%) in which over 80% use LMWH. We confirm that fatal PE following elective THR with a multi-modal prophylaxis regime is rare. Changing to low dose aspirin in low risk patients is a safe option

Thromboprophylaxis is of particular interest to the NHS due to the number of deaths from preventable hospital-acquired venous thrombo-embolism, considerable treatment cost and related long-term morbidities. In compliance with current NICE guidelines, our departmental protocol for chemical thromboprophylaxis changed from aspirin to clexane. We present a review of the use of both these chemical agents in our hip fracture patients; assessing duration of wound ooze, incidence of symptomatic PE and DVT and thrombocytopaenia. Prospective study of surgically treated hip fractures patients on chemical thromboprophylaxis postoperatively over a 7 month period. Of 224 patients reviewed, 110 fitted our inclusion criteria; 78 on Clexane and 32 on aspirin. Mean patient age: 82.6 years(48–100). Mean hospital stay: 30d ays(6–80). Female predominance (3:1). Mean duration of wound ooze: 6.9 days (1–24) for aspirin and 5.6 days (0–15) for clexane. Symptomatic DVTs: 1(3%) for aspirin and 3(3.8%) for clexane. Symptomatic PE: 0 for aspirin and 1(1.3%) for clexane. Thrombocytopenia: 0 for both groups. Mean duration of wound ooze for both groups was approximately 1 week. Low but significant incidence of thrombo-embolism. Thromboembolism-deterrent-stockings were observed to be unreliable mainly due to skin problems and compliance

Purpose: Thromboprophylaxis is recommended for at least 10 days and up to 35 days following total hip replacement (THR). Rivaroxaban is an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor in advanced clinical development that showed promise in early clinical trials. The purpose of this randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, phase III study was to compare the efficacy and safety of oral rivaroxaban with subcutaneous enoxaparin for 5 weeks, to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing primary THR. Method: Patients received 10 mg rivaroxaban orally 6–8 hours after surgery and once daily thereafter, or 40 mg enoxaparin subcutaneously the evening before surgery (restarting 6–8 hours after surgery), and continued once daily. Thromboprophylaxis was administered for 35±4 days, and mandatory, bilateral venography was conducted the next day. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of any deep vein thrombosis (DVT), non-fatal pulmonary embolism (PE), and all-cause mortality. The primary efficacy analysis was a test for non-inferiority, followed by a test for superiority. Safety endpoints included major and non-major bleeding during the active treatment period. Results: A total of 4541 patients were randomized to receive rivaroxaban or enoxaparin. Rivaroxaban significantly reduced the incidence of the composite of DVT, PE, and all-cause mortality compared with enoxaparin (1.1% vs 3.7%, respectively; p< 0.001; relative risk reduction [RRR] 70%). Rivaroxaban also significantly reduced the incidence of major VTE compared with enoxaparin (0.2% vs 2.0%, respectively; p< 0.001; RRR 88%). There were no significant differences in the incidence of major bleeding (0.3% vs 0.1%; p=0.178) or non-major bleeding (5.8% vs 5.8%; p=1.000) between rivaroxaban and enoxaparin, respectively. There was no evidence of cardiac or liver safety issues. Conclusion: Oral, once-daily rivaroxaban was significantly more effective than subcutaneous, once-daily enoxaparin for extended thromboprophylaxis following THR. Rivaroxaban was not associated with an increased risk of bleeding and had a similar safety profile to enoxaparin. This trial demonstrated the efficacy and safety of a fixed, unmonitored dose of an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor – rivaroxaban – for extended thromboprophylaxis after THR

Background: Prophylaxis against thromboembolic complications has become routine after major trauma and major orthopaedic surgery. In contrast, it remains an issue for debate whether prophylaxis after minor surgery and immobilization is necessary, even though these treatments are well-known risk factors for deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of Dalteparin (5,000 U given subcutaneously once daily for six weeks) during lower limb immobilization after surgical treatment of Achilles tendon rupture. Methods: After surgery, 105 consecutive patients were randomized to a placebo-controlled double-blind study to evaluate the efficacy of given thromboprophylaxis. DVT screening using validated color duplex sonography was performed three weeks and six weeks after surgery, and all DVTs were confirmed with phlebography. Results: Primary endpoint analysis was available for 91 patients. DVT was diagnosed in 16/47 patients (34%) in the Dalteparin group and in 16/44 patients (36%) in the placebo group. These figures are not significantly different (p=0.8). Proximal DVT was diagnosed in one patient (2%) in the Dalteparin group and in three patients (6%) in the placebo group (p=0.6). No pulmonary emboli or major bleeding occurred in either of the groups. Conclusions: DVT is common after surgical treatment of Achilles tendon rupture and therefore effective thromboprophylaxis is desirable. Thromboprophylaxis with Dalteparin however, does not affect the incidence of DVT during the immobilization after Achilles tendon rupture surgery. Long-term effects of immobilization, such as the risk for post-thrombotic syndrome, need to be investigated further

Introduction: After total hip replacement (THR), thromboprophylaxis for at least 10 days and for up to 35 days is recommended – yet a convenient, oral anticoagulant is not currently available. Rivaroxaban – a once-daily, oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor with a predictable clinical profile – is in advanced clinical development. RECORD1, a multinational, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, phase III study, compared once-daily oral rivaroxaban with subcutaneous enoxaparin for 5 weeks following THR. Methods: In total, 4541 patients were randomized to receive oral rivaroxaban 10 mg (6–8 hours after surgery and once daily thereafter), or 40 mg enoxaparin (administered subcutaneously the evening before surgery, resumed 6–8 hours after surgery, and continued once daily). Thromboprophylaxis was administered for 35±4 days; mandatory, bilateral venography was conducted the next day. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of any deep vein thrombosis (DVT), nonfatal pulmonary embolism (PE), and all-cause mortality. Safety endpoints included major and non-major bleeding during the active treatment period. Results: The incidence of the composite of DVT, PE, and all-cause mortality was significantly lower for rivaroxaban compared with enoxaparin (1.1% vs 3.7%, respectively; p< 0.001; relative risk reduction [RRR] 70%). The incidence of major VTE was also significantly lower for rivaroxaban compared with enoxaparin (0.2% vs 2.0%, respectively; p< 0.001; RRR 88%). There were no significant differences in the incidence of major bleeding (0.3% vs 0.1%; p=0.178) or non-major bleeding (5.8% vs 5.8%; p=1.000) between rivaroxaban and enoxaparin, respectively. There was no evidence of cardiac or liver safety issues. Conclusions: Following THR, thromboprophylaxis with once-daily, oral rivaroxaban was shown to be significantly more effective than subcutaneous, once-daily enoxaparin – without an increased risk of bleeding. This trial demonstrates the efficacy and safety of oral rivaroxaban using a fixed, unmonitored, once-daily dose for extended thromboprophylaxis after THR

Aim. Thromboprophylaxis in total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) remains controversial, conspicuous by absence of consensus. Because of protracted and variable mobilisation, there is an extended risk of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE). We hypothesised that a combination of low molecular weight heparin and miniwarfarin would minimise the initial and extended risk. Therefore we evolved a protocol of enoxaparin sodium 40 mgs for 5 days starting preoperatively and miniwarfarin 1-2mg for 6 weeks following surgery. We undertook a retrospective study of total hip and knee replacements in a District General Hospital between January 2000 and December 2005 to determine the effectiveness of the protocol. Methods. We analysed the incidence of symptomatic VTE in 1307 patients, of who 681 underwent THR and 626 TKR. We evaluated the incidence of symptomatic DVT and PE between 0-6 weeks, 6 weeks-3months and 3-6 months following surgery. Results. Total incidence of VTE in the study group as a whole including both total hip and knee arthroplasty in 6 months following surgery was 29/1307 (2.22%), after THR 12/681 (1.76%) and after TKR 17/626 (2.72%). VTE at 6 weeks following TKR was 12/626 (1.92%) and THR 4/681(0.59%); between 6 weeks-3 months following TKR 1/626 (0.16%) and THR 6/681 (0.88%); between 3- 6 months 4/626 (0.64%) following TKR and 2/681 (0.29%) after THR. DVT following TKR was 12/626 (1.92%) at 6 months and following THR 7/681 (1.03%). PE at 6 months after TKR was 5/626 (0.80%) and THR 5/681(0.73%) with no attributable mortality. Conclusions. The incidence of VTE using our thromboprophylaxis protocol - low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and very low dose warfarin - in THR and TKR not only compares favourably with other modes of thrombo-prophylaxis in literature, but also is cheap and cost effective

Rivaroxaban is a novel, oral, once-daily, direct Factor Xa inhibitor in advanced clinical development. RECORD1 was a multinational, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, phase III study investigating the efficacy and safety of extended thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban compared with subcutaneous enoxaparin following THR. Patients (N=4541) were randomized to receive oral rivaroxaban 10 mg (6–8 hours after surgery and once daily thereafter) or subcutaneous enoxaparin 40 mg (administered the evening before surgery, 6–8 hours after surgery, and once daily thereafter) for 35±4 days. The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of deep vein thrombosis (DVT: symptomatic or detected by mandatory, bilateral venography if asymptomatic), non-fatal pulmonary embolism (PE), and all-cause mortality up to day 36±6. Major venous thromboembolism (VTE), the composite of any DVT, non-fatal PE and VTE-related death, was a secondary outcome. Safety endpoints included major and non-major bleeding while receiving study medication. Rivaroxaban significantly reduced the incidence of the primary efficacy outcome compared with enoxaparin (1.1% vs 3.7%, respectively; p< 0.001; relative risk reduction [RRR] 70%). Rivaroxaban also significantly reduced the incidence of major VTE compared with enoxaparin (0.2% vs 2.0%, respectively; p< 0.001; RRR 88%). There were no significant differences in the incidence of major bleeding (0.3% vs 0.1%; p=0.178) or non-major bleeding (5.8% vs 5.8%; p=1.000) between rivaroxaban and enoxaparin, respectively. There was no evidence of liver safety issues associated with rivaroxaban. Thromboprophylaxis with once-daily, oral rivaroxaban was significantly more effective than subcutaneous enoxaparin following THR without an increased risk of bleeding. This trial demonstrates the efficacy and safety of a fixed, unmonitored, once-daily dose of oral rivaroxaban for extended thromboprophylaxis after THR

Total Joint Arthroplasty (TJA) is a successful orthopaedic procedure allowing dramatic clinical and functional improvements. Globally, there's been an increase in demand and performed cases associated with an increase in complications. Subsequently, focus on the prevention of complications has become important worldwide. The incidence of venous-thrombolic events (VTE) despite great attention has not diminished despite much investigation. A balance between efficacy and safety from the available agents is essential. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) has been commonly used, but oral anti-coagulants have become more popular. The aim of this study was to assess the adherence LMWH and the effectiveness and safety of preventing VTE in post-operative arthroplasty patients in a South African setting.

We conducted a prospective cohort study that included hip and knee, primary and revision, arthroplasty patients who received thromboprophylaxis with one daily injection of LMWH for 14 days post discharge. Patients who omitted 1 or more doses during the follow up period were classified as “non adherent”. A questionnaire was used at follow up visits at least 6 weeks post-operatively.

100 consecutive patients were followed up. The mean age of patients was 63.45 years. There were 68 % female patients. There was a 92% compliance rate. 60 % of patients had the injection administered by a family member, 38 % administered it themselves and 2 % had the injection administered by health professionals. Venous thromboembolic events were confirmed in 5 % at 7.86 days after surgery. Three patients had persistent wound drainage after surgery, however, none required reoperation or readmission.

Compliance with LMWH is high and is comparable with oral agents. It is effective in preventing VTE and safe with regards to bleeding and wound complications in a South African setting. Patient education regarding medications may improve compliance of the medication.

Introduction

The use of intramedullary lengthening devices is becoming increasingly popular. There are no published data regarding the incidence of venous thromboembolism following intramedullary lengthening and no reports or guidance for current practices on use of thromboprophylaxis. Following a case of post-operative deep vein thrombosis in our institution, we felt that it is important to assess best practice. We conducted this survey to collect data that would describe current practice and help guide consensus for treatment.

We report preliminary results from the first, multicenter prospective study designed to define the incidence of symptomatic (Venous Thromboembolism) VTE in patients with isolated leg fractures distal to the knee. Eight hundred and twenty-six enrolled patients have completed three months of follow up. By three months, only seven patients had sustained a symptomatic VTE with no fatal PE. Symptomatic and fatal VTE were infrequent complications after isolated leg fractures distal to the knee without thromboprophylaxis. Routine thromboprophylaxis may not be warranted in isolated leg fractures distal to the knee. To report results from the first, multicenter prospective study designed to define the incidence of symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with isolated leg fractures distal to the knee. Symptomatic and fatal VTE are infrequent complications after isolated leg fractures distal to the knee without thromboprophylaxis. Routine thromboprophylaxis may not be warranted in isolated leg fractures distal to the knee. From August 2002 to April 2004, one thousand eight hundred and eight consecutive patients with isolated leg fractures distal to the knee were screened for entry at five hospitals in Ontario. Patients with major trauma, active cancer and previous VTE were excluded. Thromboprophylaxis was not allowed. Patients were followed prospectively for three months, with telephone calls at fourteen days, six weeks and three months. Suspected DVT and PE were investigated in a standardized manner. Eight hundred and twenty-six enrolled patients have completed three months of follow up. The mean age was forty-five years (range sixteen to ninety-three) and 59.5% of this cohort was female. 99% of these fractures were unilateral and 97% were closed. Fractures included: fibula (38%), metatarsal (29%), phalanges (13%), calcaneus, talus or tarsal (10%), tibia (10%) and patella (7%). Only 11% of fractures were surgically treated. 88% of fractures received a cast or splint for a mean duration of 41+/− 20 days. Complete follow-up was available for 97.5% of this cohort. By three months only seven patients had sustained a symptomatic VTE (2 proximal DVT, 3 calf DVT, 2 PE) with no fatal PE-an incidence of 0.9% (95% CI 0.3 to 1.8%). Funding: This study was funded by a research grant from Pharmacia

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the second most common complication and pulmonary embolism (PE) is the fourth most common cause of death after a hip fracture. Despite thromboprophylaxis, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is detected in up to 45% of hip fracture patients. Thrombelastography (TEG) is a whole-blood, point of care test capable of providing clinicians with a global assessment of the clotting process, from fibrin formation to clot lysis. Maximal amplitude (mA) from TEG analysis is a measure of clot strength. Elevated admission mA values of >65mm and >72mm have been determined to be independent predictors of in-hospital PE. The coagulation index (CI) is calculated based on TEG parameters and defines hypercoagulable state as CI >3. This study aimed to use serial TEG analysis to determine the duration of hypercoagulable state after hip fracture.

A prospective cohort of hip fracture patients >50 years of age amenable to surgical treatment (AO 31A1–A3 & 31B1–B3) were enrolled at a Level I trauma centre. Serial TEG analysis (TEG 6S) was performed every 24-hours from admission until 5-days post-operatively and at 2- and 6-week follow-up visits. All patients received a minimum of 28 days of thromboprophylaxis. Descriptive statistics and single sample t-tests were used for comparison of mA to the 65mm threshold.

Thirty-five patients (26 female) with a median age of 83 (range = 71–86) years were included. On admission, 31.4% and 82.9% of patients were hypercoagulable based on mA >65mm and CI, respectively. At 2 weeks, all patients remained hypercoagulable, however, mA >72mm showed that 16 patients (47.1%) were at even higher risk for VTE. At 6-weeks, 65.7% and 97.1% of patients were hypercoagulable based on mA >65mm and CI, respectively. When compared with the mA >65mm threshold, patients were hypocoagulable at the time of admission (mA = 62.2 (±6.3), p = 0.011), but became significantly more hypercoagulable at 2-weeks (mA = 71.6 (±2.6), p < 0 .001), followed by continued hypercoagulability at 6-weeks, however not significantly elevated above the 65mm threshold (mA = 66.2 (±3.8), p = 0.058). One patient developed a symptomatic DVT at 2-weeks and had a mA = 72.9 and a CI of 5.9.

This is the first study to demonstrate that >50% of hip fracture patients remain hypercoagulable 6 weeks post fracture despite thromboprophylaxis, and there are individual hypercoagulable responses. This is critical, as guidelines only recommend 28 to 35 days of thromboprophylaxis in this high-risk population. Previously determined mA thresholds may be a more sensitive test for risk-stratifying patients' VTE risk than the CI threshold. Additionally, assessing ΔmA using serial TEG may better predict VTE risk.

Purpose: We conducted the first, multicentre, prospective cohort study to define the incidence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with tibia and ankle fractures treated conservatively and relatively minor lower leg fractures. The reported incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) using routine venography in patients with lower leg injury requiring cast immobilization is approximately 20–40%, which has lead to the routine use of anticoagulant prophylaxis for several weeks in many such patients. However the vast majority of venographically-detected DVTs are asymptomatic, distal thrombi whose clinical relevance is uncertain. Therefore venography is not the best outcome measure to assess the burden of clinically important VTE. Method: Consecutive patients with tibia and fibula fractures (treated non-operatively) and patella and foot fractures, (treated operatively or conservatively) were assessed for eligibility at 5 Ontario hospitals. Patients were enrolled after informed consent within 96 hours of injury and were followed prospectively, by telephone, at 2, 6 and 12 weeks. Those with major trauma, active cancer, and previous VTE were excluded. Thromboprophylaxis was not allowed. Education regarding symptoms of VTE was provided at study entry and patients were asked about VTE symptoms at follow up. Suspected VTE was investigated in a standardized manner. Results: From August 2002 to June 2005, 1200 patients were enrolled from 2446 consecutively screened patients. 98% of patients completed 3-month follow-up. The mean age was 45 years (16 to 93) and 60% were female. The most common fractures were fibular (39%) and most injuries were caused by falls (75%). 99 % of these fractures were unilateral. Most fractures did not require surgical repair (93%), and 82% of patients were immobilized by cast or splint for an average of 42 ±32 days. Overall, 7 patients had symptomatic, objectively confirmed VTE (2 proximal DVT, 3 calf DVT, 2 PE) with no fatal PE – an incidence of 0.6 % (95% CI 0.2 to 1.2). Conclusion: Symptomatic VTE is an infrequent complication after these fractures without thromboprophylaxis. Therefore routine thromboprophylaxis is neither warranted, nor likely to be cost-effective in these patients. This study also highlights the significant discrepancy between clinical endpoint studies and studies using venography

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious complication after total hip and knee arthroplasty. There is still no consensus regarding the best mode of thromboprophylaxis after lower limb arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to ascertain the efficacy, safety profile and rate of adverse thromboembolic events of aspirin as extended out of hospital pharmacological anticoagulation for elective primary total hip and knee arthroplasty patients and whether these rates were comparable with published data for low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Data was extracted from a prospective hospital acquired thromboembolism (HAT) database. The period of study was from 1st Jan 2013-31st Dec 2016 and a total of 6078 patients were treated with aspirin as extended thromboprophylaxis after primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. The primary outcome measure of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism within 90 days postoperatively was 1.11%. The secondary outcome rates of wound infection, bleeding complications, readmission rate and mortality were comparable to published results after LMWH use. The results of this study clearly show that Aspirin, as part of a multimodal thromboprophylactic regime, is an effective and safe regime in preventing VTE with respect to risk of DVT or PE when compared to LMWH. It is a cheaper alternative to LMWH and has associated potential cost savings.

British national guidelines recommend agents which antagonise factor Xa or warfarin as prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in lower limb arthroplasty. However, they discourage the use of aspirin prophylaxis.

We conducted a prospective, multi-centre audit between two national centres, Ninewells Hospital in Dundee and the Royal Infirmary in Edinburgh to compare bleeding and VTE risk. Only Edinburgh routinely uses aspirin as VTE prophylaxis. The study comprises a number of cycles from 2013 to 2015. Consecutive groups of patients were identified prospectively using elective theatre data and information extracted from their case-notes on type of VTE prophylaxis, VTE occurrence, wound complications and length of hospital stay for a period of nine weeks post-operatively.

262 Edinburgh patients and 92 Dundee patients were included. Most Edinburgh patients were prescribed aspirin in hospital and on discharge (188/262, 71.8%), in line with local protocol. In Dundee, dalteparin was most commonly prescribed in hospital (68/92, 73.9%) and rivaroxaban on discharge (57/92, 62.0%).

The Edinburgh group had a 1.5% incidence of pulmonary embolus (PE) and a 1% rate of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), 2% had problems with wound haematoma and one patient (0.4%) required a transfusion; no wound washouts were required. In Dundee there was 0% PE, 2% DVT, 5% had problems with haematoma, 3% required transfusion and 2% required washout. There was no difference in length of hospital stay, with a mode of 4 days for both centres.

Non-fatal PE was prevented in Dundee patients but possibly at the cost of greater incidence of wound complications.

Background: Aetiology of venous thromboembolism is multifactorial and thromboprophylaxis includes mechanical and chemical agents. There is no clear consensus on the choice of chemical agent in elective total hip arthroplasty (THA), although National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) recommends low molecular weight heparin or fondaparinux to all patients.

Aim: The aim of our study was to define the efficacy and safety of various chemical agents currently used for venous throboprophylaxis – namely aspirin, warfarin and low molecular weight heparin in primary THA.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 905 consecutive patients with primary THA during an 18 month period. Medical notes were reviewed to record demographic data, inpatient and outpatient thromboprophylactic agents, total hospital stay, readmission, incidence of DVT, pulmonary embolism and death following surgery. Post-operative mobility, transfusion requirements and complications were noted. Suspected thromboembolic events were investigated with venous Doppler ultrasound scanning and CTPA.

Results: 417 (46%) patients received aspirin, 253 received enoxaparin, 190 patients had low dose warfarin and 45 patients had none or multiple agents for inpatient thromboprophylaxis. 615 patients had cemented and 290 patients received uncemented total hip arthroplasty. Patients predominantly received aspirin (61%) as outpatient prophylactic agent. 41 patients were investigated for a suspected thromboembolic event. 2 patients had DVT and 2 patients had PE. There were 3 deaths within 6 weeks, one each due to PE, sepsis and unknown cause. All 4 patients with thromboembolism were on enoxaparin for prophylaxis.

Conclusion: In our study aspirin was the preferred choice for thromboprophylaxis following total hip arthroplasty. We found that aspirin was most effective with no complications and enoxaparin was least effective. We advise the use of aspirin as the first choice drug for thromboprophylaxis as reiterated by some recent studies.

Introduction

We studied the safety and efficacy of multimodal thromboprophylaxis (MMP) in patients with a history of venous thromboembolism (VTE) undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). MMP includes discontinuation of procoagulant medications, VTE risk stratification, regional anesthesia, an intravenous bolus of unfractionated heparin before femoral work, rapid mobilization, the use of pneumatic compression devices, and chemoprophylaxis tailored to the patient's risk.

Introduction: In April 2007, NICE published guidance on reducing the risk of venous thromboembolism. Immobilization of a limb in plaster was identified as a risk factor for thromboembolism. NICE recommend that all orthopaedic patients with risk factors are offered low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) whilst an inpatient. There was no cost effective evidence to continue treatment as an outpatient in foot and ankle patients. Foot and ankle surgery often requires prolonged periods of immobilization postoperatively. This study aims to provide a snapshot of current practice amongst foot and ankle surgeons in the UK, highlighting any differences between current practice and NICE guidelines.

Materials and Methods: A random sample of the 267 members of the British Foot and Ankle Surgery Society listed in the 2007 BOA Handbook was obtained. In order to have a 90% confidence level, the sample size was calculated to be 71. The specialist teams identified were contacted by telephone and questioned on their use of thromboprophylaxis for elective patients in plaster. The results were collated and compared to NICE guidelines.

Results: 94% of foot and ankle surgeons prescribe LMWH to post operative elective inpatients in plaster. 65% of specialists continue thromboprophylaxis for out-patients. The duration and agent of thromboprophylaxis varied markedly. The commonest agents were LMWH and aspirin. The length of treatment ranged from ten days to the duration of plaster immobilization.

Discussion: The results highlight a trend amongst foot and ankle surgeons to exceed current NICE guidelines for thromboprophylaxis, continuing treatment for an extended outpatient period. Although there was shown to be no cost effective evidence to continue treatment, the practice continues.

Conclusion: The vast majority of UK foot and ankle surgeons fulfill the NICE recommendations on thromboprophylaxis. There is a clear need for a policy statement from BOFAS on the extended use of thromboprophylaxis for outpatients immobilized in plaster.

Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) is the most common complication following major joint surgery. While attention has focused on VTE following joint arthroplasty their exists a gap in the literature examining the incidence of VTE in spinal surgery; with a shortage of epidemiological data, guidelines for optimal prophylaxis are limited.

This survey, undertaken at the 2009 BASS Annual Meeting, sought to examine prevailing trends in VTE thromboprophylaxis in spinal surgery and to compare selections made by Orthopaedic and Neurosurgeons.

We developed a questionnaire based around eight clinical scenarios. Participants were asked to supply details on their speciality (orthopaedics or neurosurgery) and level of training (grade) and to select which method(s) of thromboprophylaxis they would employ for each scenario. Thirty-nine participants provided responses to the eight scenarios; complete details, including speciality and grade of those surveyed, were complied for 27 of the 39 questionnaires completed.

LMWH was the preferred pharmacological method of thromboprophylaixs selected 31% and 72% of the time by orthopaedic and neurosurgeons respectively. For each of the eight clinical scenarios LMWH and BK TEDS were selected more frequently by neurosurgeons than orthopaedic surgeons who elected to employ early mobilisation and mechanical prophylaxis. Neurosurgeons were more likely to employ more than method of thromboprophylaxis.

Thromboprophylactic selections differed between the two groups; Neurosurgeons preferred LMWH and BK TEDS whilst Early Mobilisation and Mechanical prophylaxis were the preferred methods of thromboprophylaxis amongst orthopaedic surgeons. Based on the results of this survey neurosurgeons more closely adhered to guidelines outlined by NICE/BASS.

It is widely recognised that pelvic disruption in association with high-energy trauma is a life-threatening injury. The potential morbidity and mortality associated with acetabular injuries are less well understood. Due to chronic underfunding and the absence of a comprehensive and coordinated national approach to the management of acetabular trauma throughout the UK, patients can incur prolonged recumbency. Prompt and appropriate referral for specialist management, thromboprophylaxis and venous thrombosis surveillance are important issues for the referring centre. We performed a postal questionnaire to establish the current clinical practice in the specialist centres throughout the UK in pelvic and acetabular trauma, with respect to time to surgery, thromboprophylaxis, and surveillance.

We identified twenty-one units and thirty-seven surgeons in the NHS who deal with pelvic and acetabular injuries. The mean time to surgery from injury in the UK is 8.5 days (range 2-19 days). The larger units that accept and treat patients from outside their region experience the greatest delay to surgery. Mechanical thromboprophylaxis was used in 67% (14) of the units. 24% (5) use arterio-venous boots, 19% (4) use calf pumps, and 52% (11) use TEDS stockings. No unit routinely use prophylactic IVC filters in acetabular trauma. Chemical thromboprophylaxis is routinely used in 100% (21) of the units. 95% (20) used prophylactic doses of unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparin. Clinical surveillance alone for thromboembolism is employed in 90% (19) of the units. Only 2 (10%) units routinely perform radiological surveillance with ultrasound Doppler on its acetabular fracture cases pre-operatively.

Currently there is no published directory of dedicated pelvic and acetabular surgeons in the UK. There is no general consensus on the approach to thromboprophylaxis and surveillance in acetabular trauma in the UK. There is no consensus approach to thromboprophylaxis and surveillance in the literature.