Background context: Stable thoracolumbar spinal fracture is a common injury, yet there remains a relative lack of evidence that would allow reliable prediction of outcome. Variation in outcome in stable thoracolumbar spine fracture without neurological deficit could not be explained by the assessment made from x-rays and CT imaging alone, which measures mainly the bony injury severity. So far, no good classification system has been developed to assess the severity of soft tissue injury (disc). Objectives: To measure short-term outcome of stable
Stable
Study Design/Objectives: A pilot study to predict thoracolumbar kyphosis progression secondary to fracture in non-operatively treated patients. Summary of Background Data: Progressive saggital plane deformity can cause persistent pain after thoracolumbar vertebral fractures. Little data exists to suggest at what interval after the index injury the patient attains a low risk of developing further angular deformity in non-operatively treated patients. Methods: Supine and erect radiographs were assessed and the degree of fracture kyphosis was determined using an Oxford Cobbometer. The fracture kyphosis was recorded for each follow up appointment along with time after the fracture. A time/data analysis was performed using the Blyth-Still-Casella exact interval. Results: This study included 22 patients (13 male, 9 female) with average age 67.2 years (range, 14–87 years). The average length of follow up was 11.5 months (range, 5.3–19.9 months) and the average number of radiographs taken within this period was 4 (range, 2–6). The change in fracture kyphosis was plotted against time following fracture. Based on 15 patients with data extending to 200 days follow up, it was observed that the rate of change in fracture kyphosis between two time points of 100 and 150 days predicted the trend in kyphosis progression until the end of follow up in 14 out of the 15 patients. This observed rate of 14/15 (0.93) has a 95% confidence interval of 0.7 to 0.99 (Blyth-Still-Casella exact interval). Conclusions: The standing lateral radiograph of patients with conservatively treated
Introduction. The management of
Study design. Retrospective study. Objectives. To identify patient outcomes, in particular employment, >5-years following traumatic
Objectives. This presentation discusses the experience at our Centre with treating traumatic
Thoracolumbar injury classification systems are not used or researched extensively in paediatric population yet. This systematic review aims to explore the validity and reliability of the two main thoracolumbar injury classification systems in the paediatric population (age ≤ 18). It also aims to explore the transferability of adult classification systems to paediatrics. The Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System (TLICS) published in 2005 and the AO Spine published in 2013 were assessed in this paper because they both provide guidance for the assessment of the severity of an injury and recommend management strategies. A literature search was conducted on the following databases: Medline, EMBASE, Ovid during the period November 2020 to December 2020 for studies looking at the reliability and validity of the TLICS and AO Spine classification systems in paediatric population. Data on validity (to what extent TLICS/ AO Spine recommended treatment matched the actual treatment) and reliability (inter-rater and intra-rater reliability) was extracted. There is an “almost perfect validity” for TLICS. There is a “strong association” between the validity of TLICS and AO Spine. The intra-rater reliability is “moderate” for TLICS and “substantial” for AO Spine. The intra-rater reliability is “substantial” for TLICS and “almost perfect” for AO Spine. The six studies show a good overall validity and reliability for the application of TLICS and AO Spine in pediatric
Introduction:. Most of the published papers on AI based diagnosis have focused on the algorithm's diagnostic performance in a ‘binary’ setting (i.e. disease vs no disease). However, no study evaluated the actual value for the clinicians of an AI based approach in diagnostic. Detection of Traumatic
Study design: retrospective clinical study . Objective: To study radiological late results after posterior stabilization of
Background: Thoraco-lumbar fractures without a neurological deficit are usually suitable for non-operative treatment. The main area of clinical interest is the deformity at the injured levels. The deformity may be evident at the time of presentation, though could be expected to progress in time. Objective: Accurate assessment of the temporal behaviour in the geometry of the injured segments in non-operatively treated
Introduction: Spinal fractures are associated with pain, disability, neurological dysfunction and mortality. Osteoporosis and risky leisure time activities are increasing in the population. New treatment options have been introduced. However, only a few international studies have reported its descriptive epidemiology. There are no clear consensuses regarding the choice of operative interventions versus non-operative treatment in patients with
Background: There is conflicting evidence of correlation between clinical outcome and severity of thoracolumbar spine fractures in neurologically intact patients. 1. Kalyan et al2 presented the results of their prospective study of thoracolumbar spinal fractures and concluded that the clinical outcome was consistently better predicted by the severity of disc injury than that of the bony fracture. They suggested that if severe disc injury was present, treatment of the disc injury may result in a better short term clinical outcome. The aim of this study was to detail the incidence and type of disc injury in patients with thoracolumbar spinal fractures with intact neurology. Methods: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected spinal injury database at a regional spinal injuries unit. Only patients with a thoracolumbar spinal fracture and intact neurology were included. Retrospective analysis of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. One hundred and thirty nine neurologically intact patients (89M:50F, mean age 36 years, range 15 – 77yrs) with a thoracolumbar (T11 –L5) spinal fracture were admitted to our spinal unit over the last 11 years (1994 – 2004). Patient data was collected prospectively onto a spinal injuries database. All of these patients had an MRI scan on admission. All types of
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyse the results and morbidity of video-assisted minimally invasive thoracoctomy for anterior arthrodesis of
Introduction: Treatment of
Purpose of study: There is a controversy in the surgical treatment of unstable
Introduction. In all traumatic injury there is a clear relationship between the structural tissue damage and resultant disability after recovery. There are no publications that compare significant thoracolumbar osseous injury to non specific soft tissue injury. Aim. To compare spinal outcome measures between patients with self reported back pain in the workplace perceived as injury to those having sustained structural injury in the form of an unstable
Introduction: Introduction of the minimal invasive surgery as a new concept in spinal surgery necessitated the need for implants that can be applied through minimal invasive approaches. One of the great challenges was the development of anterior minimal invasive vertebral replacement implants that are mechanically fit and easily applicable. Many studies were concerned with the early results of such implants but not yet the long-term or late ones. Methods: Between January 2003 and December 2003 we have operated 23 patients (13 males and 10 females) with traumatic thoracic or
Purpose of the study: The treatment of
Introduction and Objective. Up to 30% of
Decision-making regarding operative versus non-operative treatment of patients with