Background

Accurate implant orientation is associated with improved outcomes after artificial joint replacement. We investigated if a novel augmented-reality (AR) platform (with live feedback) could train novice surgeons to orientate an acetabular implant as effectively as conventional training (CT).

Introduction

An emerging consensus in the surgical specialties is that skill acquisition should be more emphasized during surgical training.¹ This study was an attempt to evaluate the effects of repetitive practices using an image-free computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery (CAOS) guidance system (Exactech GPS, Blue-Ortho, Grenoble, FR) on both technical and cognitive skills.

Introduction. The efficacy of Virtual Reality (VR) as a teaching augment for arthroplasty has not been well examined for unfamiliar multistep procedures such as unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). This study sought to determine if VR improves surgical competence over traditional procedural preparation when performing a UKA. Methods. 22 Orthopaedic trainees were randomized to training sessions: 1) “VR group” with access to an immersive VR learning module that had been designed in conjunction with the manufacturer or 2) “Guide group” with access to manufacture's technique guide and surgical video. Both groups then performed a full UKA on SawBones models. Surgical competence was assessed via Objective Structures Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) validated rating system (max 25 points). Results. Participants equally distributed all training levels between groups. There was no difference in surgical times between VR and Guide groups (VR=43.0 vs Guide=42.4 mins; p=0.9). There was no difference in total OSATS score between groups (VR=14.2 vs Guide=15.7; p=0.59). There was also no difference between groups when sub-analysis was performed by training level. Most felt VR would be a useful tool for resident education (77%) and reported a likeliness to utilize VR for case preparation if available (86.4%). Conclusion. In a randomized controlled trial for trainees performing a complex, unfamiliar procedure (UKA), VR training demonstrated equivalent surgical competence to traditional technique guides and videos. Despite this, the majority of trainees find the technology beneficial and would use it if available. This project suggests as currently constructed, VR should be incorporated as an adjunct, rather than a replacement, to traditional surgical preparation/training methods

Orthopaedic training sessions, vital for surgeons to understand post-operative joint function, are primarily based on passive and subjective joint assessment. However, cadaveric knee simulators, commonly used in orthopaedic research,. 1. could potentially benefit surgical training by providing quantitative joint assessment for active functional motions. The integration of cadaveric simulators in orthopaedic training was explored with recipients of the European Knee Society Arthroplasty Travelling Fellowship visiting our institution in 2018 and 2019. The aim of the study was to introduce the fellows to the knee joint simulator to quantify the surgeon-specific impact of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on the dynamic joint behaviour, thereby identifying potential correlations between surgical competence and post-operative biomechanical parameters. Eight fellows were assigned a fresh-frozen lower limb each to plan and perform posterior-stabilised TKA using MRI-based patient-specific instrumentation. Surgical competence was adjudged using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) adapted for TKA. 2. All fellows participated in the in vitro specimen testing on a validated knee simulator,. 3. which included motor tasks – passive flexion (0°-120°) and active squatting (35°-100°) – and varus-valgus laxity tests, in both the native and post-operative conditions. Tibiofemoral kinematics were recorded with an optical motion capture system and compared between native and post-operative conditions using a linear mixed model (p<0.05). The Pearson correlation test was used to assess the relationship between the OSATS scores for each surgeon and post-operative joint kinematics of the corresponding specimen (p<0.05). OSATS scores ranged from 79.6% to 100% (mean=93.1, SD=7.7). A negative correlation was observed between surgical competence and change in post-operative tibial kinematics over the entire range of motion during passive flexion – OSATS score vs. change in tibial abduction (r=−0.87; p=0.003), OSATS score vs. change in tibial rotation (r=−0.76; p=0.02). When compared to the native condition, post-operative tibial internal rotation was higher during passive flexion (p<0.05), but lower during squatting (p<0.033). Post-operative joint stiffness was greater in extension than in flexion, without any correlation with surgical competence. Although trained at different institutions, all fellows followed certain standard intraoperative guidelines during TKA, such as achieving neutral tibial abduction and avoiding internal tibial rotation,. 4. albeit at a static knee flexion angle. However, post-operative joint kinematics for dynamic motions revealed a strong correlation with surgical competence, i.e. kinematic variability over the range of passive flexion post-TKA was lower for more skilful surgeons. Moreover, actively loaded motions exhibited stark differences in post-operative kinematics as compared to those observed in passive motions. In vitro testing on the knee simulator also introduced the fellows to new quantitative parameters for post-operative joint assessment. In conclusion, the inclusion of cadaveric simulators replicating functional joint motions could help quantify training paradigms, thereby enhancing traditional orthopaedic training, as was also the unanimous opinion of all participating fellows in their positive feedback