This is a review of the literature detailing the causes, presentation and appropriate investigations of patients with suprascapular nerve compression. The choices of treatment are discussed in the context of the pathology found. The recommended surgical procedures are described. Suprascapular nerve compression is an uncommon cause of persisting and diffuse shoulder pain that arises from direct trauma to the shoulder or as a result of repetitive, overhead manoeuvres producing a traction type injury. The presence of tenderness over the suprascapular notch, weakness in external rotation and especially the presence of infraspinatus or supraspinatus atrophy (either separately or in combination) with positive nerve conduction studies confirm the diagnosis of suprascapular nerve entrapment. MRI is recommended for identification of a cause of the nerve compression. Fibrous transverse ligaments have been seen causing stenosis and entrapment at the suprascapular and spinoglenoid notch. A variety of space-occupying lesions can be found in the notches including supraglenoid ganglia and tumours. Initial conservative management of the shoulder is recommended when the neuropathy results from repetitive activity in the absence of a space-occupying lesion. Early decompression of the nerve using arthroscopic debridement of the labrum and open release of the ligaments at the suprascapular and spinoglenoid notch is advocated in the presence of a ganglion cyst

Purpose: Due to its proximity to the glenohumeral joint, the suprascapular nerve may be at risk of iatrogenic nerve injury during arthroscopic labral repair. Our primary objective is to evaluate the risk of suprascapular nerve injury during standard drilling techniques utilized in arthroscopic superior labral repairs. Secondarily, we evaluated the correlation between this risk and scapular size. Method: Forty-two cadaveric shoulders were dissected to isolate their scapulae. A surgical drill and guide was used to create suture anchor holes in 3 locations in the superior rim of the glenoids as typically done in arthroscopic superior labral repairs. The orientation of these drill holes correspond to common shoulder arthroscopic portals. The suprascapular nerve was then dissected from the suprascapular notch to the spinoglenoid notch. The presence of drill perforations through the medial cortex of the glenoid vault was recorded along with the corresponding hole depth and distance to the suprascapular nerve. Results: Medial glenoid vault perforations occurred in 8/21(38%) cadavers with a total of 18/126(14%) perforations. The suprascapular nerve was in line of the drill path in 5/18(28%) perforations. Female specimens and smaller scapulae had a statistically higher risk of having a perforation (p< 0.05). Conclusion: The results of this anatomic study suggest that there is a substantial risk of medial glenoid vault perforation. When a perforation does occur, the suprascapular nerve appears to be at high risk for injury especially with more posterior drill holes. The risk is significantly higher in females and in smaller scapulae

Five patients with entrapment of the suprascapular nerve treated in a 7 year period (2000–2006) were reviewed. There were 4 males and 1 female with an average age of 35 years (15–59). The patients presented with non-specfic pain around the scapula and shoulder. Four of the patients had marked wasting and weakness of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles. One patient had congenital non-union of the clavicles. One patient was a competitive pole vaulter but there was no apparent aetiological factor in the other 3. The diagnosis was confirmed with nerve conduction studies in all the patients. All underwent MRI scan which was normal in 4 patients and showed a cyst in the spinoglenoid notch in the 5. th. Four patients had an open release of the suprascapular nerve, the patients whose MRI showed a cyst was found at surgery to have an abnormal vessel compressing the nerve. One patient had an arthroscopic release of the suprascapular nerve. Four patients were available for follow-up. The follow-up averaged 22 months (6–58). All patients had complete relief of pain and almost complete recovery of strength. In conclusion, the diagnosis of suprascapular nerve entrapment must be entertained when patients present with non-specific periscapular pain and wasting of the supraspnatus and infraspinatus muscles. MRI must be done to rule out cysts. Surgical release is successful and can be done arthroscopically

The early diagnosis of the suprascapular nerve (SSN) entrapment in overhead athletes with simultaneous shoulder injuries and its arthroscopic release plays an important role for their appropriate treatment and recovery. SSN release at suprascapular and spinoglenoid notches, seems very helpful for increasing their performance. 21 Elite overhead athletes were treated from Jan 2005–May 2009. From 16 to 34 years old, mean 26 years, 4 Javelin throwers (Olympic and National level thrower), 4 Weightlifters (International level), 8 Volleyball Players, 3 Kick Boxer, 2 Water Polo Players. Extreme ROM of arm creates large torques about the shoulder cycle of repetitive microtrauma to the SSN, Direct trauma: fracture, dislocation, blunt trauma traction injury, Sling effect with hyper-abduction injury at the SS Notch, Correlation ROM with SSN entrapment in volley ball players, Eccentric contraction of the ISP (spinoglenoid notch), Internal impingement, Rotator cuff tears, Biceps lesions, Instability, SLAP lesion, Bankart lesion, Mainly infraspinatus muscle atrophy. X-rays, Nerve conduction studies, EMG studies, MRI. All of them had complete pain relief, especially at the posterior shoulder, regained full ROM of the operated shoulder, 19 fully recovered at the pre-injury level, 2 at the postoperative phase, Muscle atrophy improved. Advanced SSN entrapment provoke significant muscle wasting, often irreversible. This underscores the importance of a quick and accurate diagnosis to appropriate intervention. The overhead athletes with increased ROM of their shoulder predispose in SSN entrapment and shoulder injuries and vice-versa. An arthroscopic shoulder procedure for repairing the glenohumeral pathology with a simultaneous arthroscopic SSN release seems to be the appropriate treatment regarding to our resu

Aims

Frozen shoulder is a common, painful condition that results in impairment of function. Corticosteroid injections are commonly used for frozen shoulder and can be given as glenohumeral joint (GHJ) injection or suprascapular nerve block (SSNB). Both injection types have been shown to significantly improve shoulder pain and range of motion. It is not currently known which is superior in terms of relieving patients’ symptoms. This is the protocol for a randomized clinical trial to investigate the clinical effectiveness of corticosteroid injection given as either a GHJ injection or SSNB.

The June 2013 Shoulder & Elbow Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: whether suture anchors are still the gold standard; infection and revision elbow arthroplasty; the variable success of elbow replacements; sliding knots; neurologic cuff pain and the suprascapular nerve; lies, damn lies and statistics; osteoarthritis; and one- or two-stage treatment for the infected shoulder revision.