Aims. The aims of this study were to describe the demographic, socioeconomic, and educational factors associated with core surgical trainees (CSTs) who apply to and receive offers for higher surgical training (ST3) posts in Trauma & Orthopaedics (T&O). Methods. Data collected by the UK Medical Education Database (UKMED) between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2019 were used in this retrospective longitudinal cohort study comprising 1,960 CSTs eligible for ST3. The primary outcome measures were whether CSTs applied for a T&O ST3 post and if they were subsequently offered a post. A directed acyclic graph was used for detecting confounders and adjusting logistic regression models to calculate odds ratios (ORs), which assessed the association between the primary outcomes and relevant exposures of interest, including: age, sex, ethnicity, parental socioeconomic status (SES), domiciliary status, category of medical school, Situational Judgement Test (SJT) scores at medical school, and success in postgraduate examinations. This study followed STROBE guidelines. Results. Compared to the overall cohort of CSTs, females were significantly less likely to apply to T&O (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.46; n = 155/720 female vs n = 535/1,240 male; p < 0.001). CSTs who were not UK-domiciled prior to university were nearly twice as likely to apply to T&O (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.39 to 2.85; n = 50/205 vs not UK-domiciled vs n = 585/1,580 UK-domiciled; p < 0.001). Age, ethnicity, SES, and medical school category were not associated with applying to T&O. Applicants who identified as ‘black and minority ethnic’ (BME) were significantly less likely to be offered a T&O ST3 post (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.97; n = 165/265 BME vs n = 265/385 white; p = 0.034). Differences in age, sex, SES, medical school category, and SJT scores were not significantly associated with being offered a T&O ST3 post. Conclusion. There is an evident disparity in sex between T&O applicants and an ethnic disparity between those who receive offers on their first attempt. Further high-quality, prospective research in the post-COVID-19 pandemic period is needed to improve equality, diversity, and inclusion in T&O training. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(8):697–707

Aim. S. aureus and S. epidermidis remain the leading biofilm-forming agents causing orthopedic implant-associated infections (OIAI), but other coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) with clinical importance is emerging. Besides, few studies have assessed specific genomic traits associated with patient outcome. This is a preliminary descriptive study of phenotypic and genomic features identified in clinical isolates of S. aureus and CoNS isolates recovered from OIAIs patients that progressed to treatment failure. Methods. Ten isolates were identified by matrix-time-of-flight laser-assisted desorption mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) and tested for antibiotic susceptibility and biofilm formation. Genotypic characteristics, including, MLST (Multi Locus Sequence Typing), SCCmec typing, virulence and resistance genes were assessed by whole-genome sequencing (WGS) that was performed on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform. Bioinformatics analyzes were performed using CGE, PATRIC, VFDB, CARD RGI, SnapGene, BLAST, and PubMLST. S. aureus (215, 260 and 371) isolates belonged to CC5 (ST5 and ST105, spa type t002) and carried SCCmec type I (1B), II (2A) and V(5C2), respectively. Results. They carried multiple resistance genes, with all resistant to methicillin (MRSA), and harboured mecA, blaZ. S. aureus 215 and 371 carried ermA gene and multiple genes for aminoglycosides resistance including aph(3’)-III, ant(9)-Ia, and ant(4)-Ib, and for quinolones. S. aureus 260 also carried resistance genes for tetracycline, quinolones and trimethoprim (dfrC). All MRSA were strong biofilm producers harboring the complete icaADBC and icaR operon, and also carried multiple adhesion and toxin-related virulence genes. Seven CoNS isolates comprising five species (S. epidermidis, S. haemolyticus, S. sciuri, S. capitis and S. lugdunensis) were analyzed, with mecA gene detection in five isolates. S. haemolitycus (95) and S. lugdunensis were unable to form biofilm and did not harbor the complete icaADBCR operon. S. epidermidis (216, 403) and S. haemolyticus (53,95) isolates belonged to the ST2/CC2, ST183, ST9 and ST3, respectively. High variability of adhesion genes was detected, with atl, ebp, icaADBC operon and IS256 being the most common. Conclusions. In conclusion, this study provides insights into the phenotypic and genomic analysis of Staphylococci allowing elucidation of MRSA and CoNS specific features that are associated with treatment failure in OIAIs, including genes associated with biofilm production, and resistance to β-lactam and aminoglycosides

Nationwide changes in the organisation of specialist medical training present a challenge to surgical trainees in terms of exposure to an adequate case load, the acquisition of practical experience and therefore also of judgement and decision-making. When accompanied by accredited trainers exposure to practice in the developing world offers trainees the opportunity to enhance their clinical exposure as well as skills in communication, teaching, management and leadership. This paper analyses the training value for orthopaedic trainees of a novel orthopaedic project undertaken in Kenya in February 2009 utilising an entire UK orthopaedic team. The first Kenya Orthopaedic Project (KOP) was organised by an orthopaedic trainee and took place at Nanyuki District General Hospital in February 2009. Kenya does not have the luxury of a national health service and patients must pay for any clinics or surgery. The cost of orthopaedic surgery in this environment is prohibitive and many fractures go untreated, as do other common pathologies such as severe osteoarthritis and osteomyelitis. The UK team undertaking the project included two accredited consultant orthopaedic surgeons and an orthopaedic trainee. Clinics, surgery and teaching sessions were performed for one week with the aim of relieving the sheer volume of orthopaedic cases and to provide those impoverished patients with treatment they would not otherwise receive. Data was taken from elogbook to analyse the average number of cases performed by an orthopaedic ST3 in one week, and a survey was sent to all Southwest trainees (n=25) for information on how many competencies and work placed based assessments were completed in one week. Daily challenges of health care budgeting, negotiating, organisational and intercultural communication skills are not often encountered by UK orthopaedic trainees, and bring with them a realisation of the wider picture of health care economics and appreciation of the benefits of a National Health Service. The results showed that in one week during KOP over seventy patients were seen in clinic and eighteen operations performed. Of the 18 operations performed the orthopaedic trainee assisted in 15 of these operations and performed 3 under supervision. An average week log book entry for ST3 trainees, taken from elogbook statistics, contains six elective and three trauma operations. The figures from one week Kenya Orthopaedic Project double these operative numbers. Six workplace based assessments were completed in one week on the project, significantly more than an average of 0.16 per week in UK. (p=0.0003). In conclusion Kenya Orthopaedic Projects offer a unique experience for orthopaedic trainees and all members of the multidisciplinary team. Trainees are offered the opportunity to put into practice managerial, teaching, organisational and communication skills as well as the chance to see and treat pathologies that would not be encountered in the UK. The experience of operating in third world conditions with minimal equipment available, communicating with patients and theatre staff from a different culture whilst ensuring all possible western world safety measures are adhered to offers a wholly challenging and valuable perspective to an orthopaedic trainee. Both operative experience and workplace based assessments statistically surpassed that of an average week of a UK trainee. We can therefore conclude that a week’s orthopaedic experience in a third world country is not only beneficial to the patients but offers excellent training opportunities in all aspects of the delivery of health care and makes a positive contribution to orthopaedic training

Skills simulation is increasingly used as a training tool in postgraduate surgical training. Trainee's perception of the value of this experience has not previously been investigated. Our aim was to investigate the value of surgical simulation training delivered by an arthroscopy skills course. We constructed a subject-specific, self-assessment questionnaire based around the ISCP Peer Assessment Tool. The questionnaire was administered to candidates before and after attending the Plymouth Arthroscopy Skills Course. Participant demographic data was recorded. Questionnaire data was interrogated to give an overview of the course, as well as the benefit of site-specific skills stations. Statistical analysis showed the data to be normally distributed. The paired T-test was used to compare mean values. Twelve surgical trainees attended the course – CT2 trainees (n=4); ST3 trainees (n=7); ST4 trainee (n=1). 11 candidates completed both administered questionnaires giving a 92% response rate. The global mean score at the beginning of the course was 2.39. The global mean score at the end of the course was 3.90. The mean improvement was 1.51 (p<0.01; 95% CI = 0.96–2.07). Skill station specific scores all showed improvement with the greatest effect in wrist arthroscopy. CT trainees had a lower mean score compared to ST trainees. Both groups completed the course with similar mean scores. This study shows that arthroscopy simulation improves trainee-reported ratings of surgical skill. It also shows that less experienced candidates derived the greatest benefit from the training. Further research is required to compare self-assessed performance against objective benchmarks using validated assessment tools

Skills simulation is increasingly used as a training tool in postgraduate surgical training. Trainee's perception of the value of this experience has not previously been investigated. The aim of this investigation was to investigate the value of surgical simulation training delivered by an arthroscopy skills course. We constructed a subject-specific, self-assessment questionnaire based around the ISCP Peer Assessment Tool. The questionnaire was administered to candidates before and after attending the Plymouth Arthroscopy Skills Course. Participant demographic data was recorded. Questionnaire data was interrogated to give an overview of the course, as well as the benefit of site-specific skills stations. Statistical analysis showed the data to be normally distributed. The paired T-test was used to compare mean values. Twelve surgical trainees attended the course – CT2 trainees (n=4); ST3 trainees (n=7); ST4 trainee (n=1). 11 candidates completed both administered questionnaires giving a 92% response rate. The global mean score at the beginning of the course was 2.39. The global mean score at the end of the course was 3.90. The mean improvement was 1.51 (p<0.01; 95% CI= 0.96-2.07). Skill station specific scores all showed improvement with the greatest effect in wrist arthroscopy. CT trainees had a lower mean score compared to ST trainees. Both groups completed the course with similar mean scores. This study shows that arthroscopy simulation improves trainee-reported ratings of surgical skill. It also shows that less experienced candidates derived the greatest benefit from the training. Further research is required to compare self-assessed performance against objective benchmarks using validated assessment tools

Aims

Complete ruptures of the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) of the thumb are a common injury, yet little is known about their current management in the UK. The objective of this study was to assess the way complete UCL ruptures are managed in the UK.

Aims

The number of females within the speciality of trauma and orthopaedics (T&O) is increasing. The aim of this study was to identify: 1) current attitudes and behaviours of UK female T&O surgeons towards pregnancy; 2) any barriers faced towards pregnancy with a career in T&O surgery; and 3) areas for improvement.

The imminent introduction of the new Trauma & Orthopaedic (T&O) curriculum, and the implementation of the Improving Surgical Training initiative, reflect yet another paradigm shift in the recent history of trauma and orthopaedic training. The move to outcome-based training without time constraints is a radical departure from the traditional time-based structure and represents an exciting new training frontier. This paper summarizes the history of T&O training reform, explains the rationale for change, and reflects on lessons learnt from the past.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2-3:181–190.

Aims

Surgical treatment of hip fracture is challenging; the bone is porotic and fixation failure can be catastrophic. Novel implants are available which may yield superior clinical outcomes. This study compared the clinical effectiveness of the novel X-Bolt Hip System (XHS) with the sliding hip screw (SHS) for the treatment of fragility hip fractures.

There are significant differences in the methods and styles of orthopaedic surgical training between continents, all with the aim to produce competent consultant surgeons, but the differences in training content and pathway are vast. We review and contrast the key differences between three continents.

Objectives

The annual incidence of hip fracture is 620 000 in the European Union. The cost of this clinical problem has been estimated at 1.75 million disability-adjusted life years lost, equating to 1.4% of the total healthcare burden in established market economies. Recent guidance from The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) states that research into the clinical and cost effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty (THA) as a treatment for hip fracture is a priority. We asked the question: can a trial investigating THA for hip fracture currently be delivered in the NHS?