Introduction. Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) can be managed through a variety of different surgical approaches from closed reduction to simple tenotomies of the adductors and through to osteotomies of the femur and pelvis. The rate of redislocation following open reduction for the treatment of DDH may be affected by the number of intraoperative surgeons. Materials and methods. We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of 109 patients who underwent open reduction with or without bony osteotomies as a primary intervention between 2013 and 2023. We measured the number of redislocations and number of operating surgeons (either 1 or 2 operating surgeons) to assess for any correlation. 109 patients were identified and corresponded to 121 primary hip operations, the mean age at operation was 82.2 months (range 6 to 739 months). During the 10-year period 7 hip redislocations were identified. Results. Of the 7 redislocated hips, the rate of redislocation was found to be higher in patients who had undergone surgery via a single surgeon (5 redislocations) compared to the dual surgeon cohort (2 redislocations), though this did not reach statistical significance. Redislocation was more common in female patients and right laterality 7.2% and 8.7% respectively, though this again did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions. We conclude that a single surgeon approach, female gender and right laterality are potential risk factors for redislocation following open reduction. Further investigation utilising a larger sample size would be required to appropriately explore these potential risk factors further

This paper highlights the fact that full length labral tears are a cause of instability in posterior fracture-dislocations of the hip. From July 1994 to March 2001, 133 consecutive posterior fracture-dislocations of the hip were surgically treated. On admission, all patients were initially subjected to closed reduction, and in some cases skeletal or skin traction was applied. Pelvic radiographs were taken to confirm relocation, and CT done to look for intra-articular bone fragments. Intra-operative findings and surgical technique were recorded. Redislocation occurred in eight patients, whose surgical notes were reviewed to determine the cause. Despite 9 kg of skeletal traction, one patients’s hip redislocated the day after closed reduction. In the other seven, redislocation occurred postoperatively. The time to redislocation varied from one day to 16 weeks, and because redislocation was sometimes painless, not all patients reported it immediately. Two patients, whose radiographs showed very small fragments at the superior-posterior position, would normally have been treated conservatively. On one, surgery was performed because the fragment was lodged at the weight-bearing area of the joint. The hip of the other redislocated on skeletal traction the day after closed reduction. At surgery, it was noted that both patients had extensive soft tissue stripping and full length tears of the labrum. The other six patients had clear posterior wall fractures requiring surgical reconstruction. The fragments were often attached to the capsule but were too small to fix with screws, so buttress plating was used alone. Full-length labral tears in posterior dislocations of the hip cause instability, and failure to address this adequately at surgery may result in redislocation

Aims. To investigate the risk factors for unsuccessful radial head reduction (RHR) in children with chronic Monteggia fractures (CMFs) treated surgically. Methods. A total of 209 children (mean age 6.84 years (SD 2.87)), who underwent surgical treatment for CMFs between March 2015 and March 2023 at six institutions, were retrospectively reviewed. Assessed risk factors included age, sex, laterality, dislocation direction and distance, preoperative proximal radial metaphysis width, time from injury to surgery, reduction method, annular ligament reconstruction, radiocapitellar joint fixation, ulnar osteotomy, site of ulnar osteotomy, preoperative and postoperative ulnar angulation, ulnar fixation method, progressive ulnar distraction, and postoperative cast immobilization. Independent-samples t-test, chi-squared test, and logistic regression analysis were used to identify the risk factors associated with unsuccessful RHR. Results. Redislocation occurred during surgery in 48 patients (23%), and during follow-up in 44 (21.1%). The mean follow-up of patients with successful RHR was 13.25 months (6 to 78). According to the univariable analysis, time from injury to surgery (p = 0.002) and preoperative dislocation distance (p = 0.042) were identified as potential risk factors for unsuccessful RHR. However, only time from injury to surgery (p = 0.007) was confirmed as a risk factor by logistic regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and chi-squared test confirmed that a time from injury to surgery greater than 1.75 months increased the rate of unsuccessful RHR above the cutoff (p = 0.002). Conclusion. Time from injury to surgery is the primary independent risk factor for unsuccessful RHR in surgically treated children with CMFs, particularly in those with a time from injury to surgery of more than 1.75 months. No other factors were found to influence the incidence of unsuccessful RHR. Surgical reduction of paediatric CMFs should be performed within the first two months of injury whenever possible. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(7):581–591

Aims

The purpose of this study was to calculate the dislocation rate following open or closed reduction for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in our unit. In addition we evaluated the posterior neck line as a method of determining hip relocation and assessed the morphology of the dysplastic acetabulum on single slice CT scan.

To determine in skeletally mature patients with a traumatic, first-time, patellar dislocation, the effect of early MPFL reconstruction versus rehabilitation on the rate of recurrent patellar dislocations and functional outcomes. Three online databases MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed were searched from database inception (1946, 1974, 1966 respectively), to August 20th, 2021, for literature addressing the management of patients sustaining acute first-time patellar dislocations. Data on redislocation rates, functional outcomes using the Kujala score, and complication rates were recorded. A meta-analysis was used to pool the mean postoperative kujala score as well as calculate the proportion of patients sustaining redislocation episodes using a random effects model. A risk of bias assessment was performed for all included studies using the MINORS and Detsky scores. Overall, there were a total of 22 studies and 1705 patients included in this review. The pooled mean redislocation rate in 18 studies comprising 1409 patients in the rehabilitation group was 31% (95% CI 25%-36%, I2 = 65%). Moreover, the pooled mean redislocation rate in five studies comprising 318 patients undergoing early MPFL reconstruction was 7% (95% CI 2%-17%, I2 = 70%). The pooled mean postoperative Kujala anterior knee pain score in three studies comprising 67 patients in the reconstructive group was 91 (95% CI 84-97, I2 = 86%), compared to a score of 81 (95% CI 78-85, I2 = 78%) in 7 studies comprising 332 patients in the rehabilitation group. The reoperation rate was 9.0% in 936 patients in the rehabilitation group and 2.2% in 322 patients in the reconstruction group. Management of acute first-time patellar dislocations with MPFL reconstruction resulted in a lower rate of redislocation and a higher Kujala score, as well as noninferiority with respect to complication rates compared to nonoperative treatment. The paucity of high-level evidence warrants further investigation in this topic in the form of well-designed and high-powered RCTs to determine the optimal management option in these patients

Background. Primary dislocation of the patella is a common acute knee disorder in children, adolescents and young adults. While primary dislocation of the patella has traditionally been treated non-operatively, primary operative repair of the medial patella-stabilizing soft tissues has been popularized more recently and thought to reduce the risk of dislocation. However, several studies have shown substantial rates of redislocation with longer follow-up time, irrespective of treatment. The purpose of this systematic review was to compare operative and non-operative treatment for primary dislocation of the patella, regarding redislocation rates and symptoms. Methods. Based on a systematic literature search of the medical literature from 1950 to 2010, three randomized and two quasi-randomized controlled clinical trials comparing surgical stabilization with non-operative treatment for patients with primary patellar dislocation were selected. The Risk of Bias Tool (Cochrane Handbook, 2008) was used to assess the quality of the studies included. Study results were pooled using the fixed-effects and random-effects models with mean differences and risk ratios for continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively. Heterogeneity across studies was assessed with Q test and I-square statistic. A sensitivity analysis was performed by assessing the change on effect size by eliminating each single trial. Results. In total, 341 patients from 5 trials were included. 158 patients were treated non-operatively and 183 patients were treated operatively. For primary outcome of patellar redislocation, while significant heterogeneity was found using the random-effects model, no significant difference was observed between the treatment groups (pooled RR=1.36, 95% CI 0.8–2.31, p=0.25). No significant difference was observed between the treatment groups (pooled RR=1.36, 95% CI0.8–2.31, p=0.25). No significant differences were found between both groups for symptoms ofinstability (RR of 1.24, 95% CI 0.96–1.59, p=0.10), Kujala knee score (−5.66, 95% CI −15.51 −4.19, p=0.26) or requirement for later surgery (RR=0.92, CI 0.61–1.39, p=0.69). Conclusions. This meta-analysis found no differences in patellar redislocation rate, patient reported instability symptoms, Kujala Knee score and rate of later surgery after initial treatment, between operative and non-operative treatment of primary patellar dislocation. Level of evidence. Level II

The aim of this study was to determine if the extent of the glenoid and humeral bone loss affects the rate of recurrent instability and the functional outcome following the Latarjet procedure. 161 patients underwent open Latarjet procedure during the period 2006–2015 (Mean age 30.0 years, 150t (93.2%) Male, 118 (73.3%) primary procedure). Functional outcome was measured using the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDash) score at a mean of 4.7 years post-operatively. All patients underwent computed tomographic (CT) imaging pre-operatively. Using three-dimensional reconstruction, the glenoid bone loss, Hill-Sachs lesion and ‘Glenoid Track’ status was recorded. Radiographically-confirmed redislocation was rare (1.2%), but 18.5% (n=23/124) reported ongoing subjective shoulder instability. Fifty-two shoulders (32.3%) were classified as “Off-Track”. The median Quick DASH and WOSI scores were 2.27 (IQR 9.09; range 0–70.45) and 272.0 (IQR 546.5; range 0–2003), respectively. There were no significant differences observed between overall Quick DASH scores or WOSI scores for either On-Track or Off-Track groups (p=0.7 and 0.73, respectively). Subjective instability was not influenced by the degree of glenoid bone loss (p=0.82), the overall size of the Hill-Sachs lesion (p=0.80), or the presence of an ‘Off-Track’ lesion (p=0.84). Functional outcome and recurrent instability following the Latarjet procedure do not appear to be influenced by the extent of glenohumeral bone loss prior to surgery

MPFL reconstruction has demonstrated a very high success rate with improved patella stability, physical function, and patient-reported outcomes. However technical error and a lack of consideration of anatomic risk factors have been shown to contribute to failure after MPFL reconstruction. Previous research has also reported a complication rate of 26% following surgery. The purposes of this study were to determine the re-dislocation rate, type and number of complications, and most common additional surgical procedures following MPFL reconstruction. Patients with symptomatic recurrent patellofemoral instability underwent an MPFL reconstruction (n = 268) and were assessed with a mean follow-up of 31.5 months (minimally 24-months). Concomitant procedures were performed in addition to the MPFL reconstruction in order to address significant anatomic or biomechanical characteristics. Failure of the patellofemoral stabilization procedure was defined as post-operative re-dislocation of the patella. Rates of complications and re-procedures were assessed for all patients. The re-dislocation rate following MPFL reconstruction was 5.6% (15/268). There were no patella fractures. A total of 49/268 patients (18.3%) returned to the operating room for additional procedures following surgery. The most common reason for additonal surgery was removal of symptomatic tibial tubercle osteotomy hardware in 24/268 patients (8.9%). A further 9.3% of patients underwent addtional surgery including revision MPFL reconstruction: with trochleoplasty 8/268 (3.0%), with tibial tubercule osteotomy 4/286 (1.5%) and with femoral derotation osteotomy 3/268 (1.1%); manipulation under anaesthesia for reduced knee range of motion 4/268 (1.5%); knee arthroscopy for pain 8/268 (3.0%); and cartilage restoration procedures 3/268 (1.1%). There was 1 case of wound debridement for surgical incision infection. MPFL reconstruction using an a la carte approach to surgical selection demonstrated a post-operative redislocation rate of 5.6%. The rate of complications following surgical stabilization was low, with the most common reason for additional surgery being removal of hardware

We treated 133 traumatic posterior dislocations surgically between July 1994 and March 2001. In 16 patients, labral tears had occurred. Operating on posterior hip dislocations, initially we fixated the posterior wall with screws and/or buttress plate, depending on the size of the fragment, and did suture the torn labrum, relying rather on the buttress plate or intact posterior wall for stability. We began repairing the torn labrum when we realised that any small fragments still attached to the labrum simply pull out from under the buttress plate, allowing the hip to redislocate. Once the wall has been reconstructed, interrupted sutures are passed through the labrum, with the hip internally rotated to prevent shortening of the capsule when sutures are tied. A one-third tubular plate is placed over the sutures lying on the posterior wall and fixed with screws. The sutures are then tied individually over the plate. Postoperatively the patient is kept in bed for six weeks, with the hip abducted and knee extended. Seven patients in whom the labrum was not repaired experienced redislocation. We performed second operations on two of them, repositioning the plates and reconstructing the posterior wall, but redislocation again occurred. The redislocated femoral heads were damaged because they rubbed against the plate and screws. In the other nine patients, we sutured the labrum, and in a 3 month to 2.5 year follow-up, no redislocation has occurred. . Labral repair restores stability, and tying interrupted sutures over a buttress plate is an easy and effective method of repair

Treatment of recurrent dislocation: approximately: 1/3 of failures (probably higher in the absence of a clear curable cause). In the US: most popular treatment option: constrained liners with high redislocation and loosening rates in most reports. Several interfaces leading to various modes of failures. In Europe: dual mobility cups (or tripolar unconstrained): first design Gilles Bousquet 1976 (Saint Etienne, France), consisting of a metal shell with a highly polished inner surface articulating with a mobile polyethylene insert (large articulation). The femoral head is captured into the polyethylene (small articulation) using a snap fit type mechanism leading to a large effective unconstrained head inside the metal cup. With dual mobility, most of the movements occur in the small articulation therefore limiting wear from the large polyethylene on metal articulation. Contemporary designs include: CoCr metal cup for improved friction, outer shell coated with titanium and hydroxyapatite, possible use of screws to enhance primary stability (revision), cemented version in case of major bone defect requiring bone reconstruction. Increased stability obtained through an ultra-large diameter effective femoral head increasing the jumping distance. Dual mobility in revision for recurrent dislocation provided hip stability in more than 94% of the cases with less than 3% presenting redislocation up to 13-year follow-up. A series from the UK concerning 115 revisions including 29 revisions for recurrent dislocation reported 2% dislocation in the global series and 7% re-dislocation in patients revised for instability. A recent report of the Swedish hip arthroplasty register including 228 patients revised for recurrent dislocation showed 99% survival with revision for dislocation as the endpoint and 93% with revision for any reason as the endpoint. One specific complication of dual mobility sockets: intra-prosthetic dislocation (ie: dislocation at the small articulation): often asymptomatic or slight discomfort, eccentration of the neck on AP radiograph, related to wear and fatigue of the polyethylene rim at the capturing are through aggressive stem neck to mobile polyethylene insert contact (3rd articulation). Risk factors include: large and aggressive femoral neck design implants, small head/neck ratio, skirted heads, major fibrosis and periprosthetic ossifications. Current (over ?) use in France: 30% of primary THA, 60% in revision THA. Proposed (reasonable) indications: primary THA at high risk for dislocation, revision THA for instability and/or in case of abductors deficiency, Undisputed indication: recurrent dislocation

Combined glenoid and humeral bone loss has been identified as an important factor in predicting recurrence after arthroscopic shoulder stabilisation. The “glenoid track” concept is proposed to predict recurrent instability by comparing the relative size of the glenoid to the humeral bone defect. The aim of this study was to investigate whether assessment of the glenoid track on a pre-operative MR arthrogram could be used to predict subsequent instability in a typical UK population. A retrospective study was undertaken of 175 primary arthroscopic stabilisation procedures of which 82% (n=143) were men. The median age was 26 years (IQR 22 to 32, range 16 to 77). The median follow-up was 76 months (range 21 to 125). A pre-operative MR arthrogram was used to determine if the shoulder was on-track or off-track. The endpoint of recurrent dislocation was examined. The prevalence of “off-track” bone loss in this group was 14.2% (n=25). There were 6 (24%) dislocations in the off-track group compared with 5 (3.33%) dislocations in the on-track group (RR 7.2, 95% CI 2.45 to 20.5, p=0.001). At 5 years, the cumulative redislocation rate was 26.1% in the off-track group compared with 8.7% in on-track group. The rate of any recurrent instability was 60% (n=15) v 18% (n=27) (RR 3.33, 95% CI 2.02 to 5.20, p<0.0001). Glenoid track (on v off) was not predicted by gender (p=0.411). In a typical UK population assessment of the glenoid track on an MR arthrogram can be used to risk stratify patients with shoulder instability

Abduction braces are commonly prescribed following the closed reduction of a dislocated prosthetic hip joint. Their use is controversial with limited evidence to support their use. We have conducted a retrospective review of dislocations in primary total hip replacements over a nine year period and report redislocation rates in patients braced, compared to those who were not. 67 patients were identified. 69% of those patients who were braced had a subsequent dislocation. Likewise 69% of those who did not receive a brace re-dislocated. 33% of patients that were braced dislocated whilst wearing the brace. Bracing was associated with patient discomfort, sleep disturbance, skin irritation and breakdown. Small femoral head size, monoblock femoral components and poor biomechanical reconstruction was prevalent amongst dislocators. Abduction bracing following closed reduction of a total hip replacement is costly(e950), does not prevent redislocation and may be the cause of considerable morbidity to the patient

Fully constrained liners are used to treat recurrent dislocations or patients at high risk after total hip replacements. However, they can cause significant morbidities including recurrent dislocations, infections, aseptic loosening and fractures. We examine long term results of 111 patients with tripolar constrained components to assess their redislocation and failure rate. The purpose of this study was to assess survivorship, complications and functional outcomes at a minimum 10 years after the constrained tripolar liners used in our institute. We retrospectively identified 111 patients who had 113 revision tripolar constrained liners between 1998 and 2008. Eighty-nine were revised due to recurrent dislocations, 11 for pseudotumor with dysfunctional abductors, and 13 for periprosthetic infection with loss of soft tissue stabilizers. All patients had revision hip arthroplasty before the constrained liner was used: 13 after the first revision, 17 after the second, 38 after the third, and 45 had more than 3 revisions. We extracted demographics, implant data, rate of dislocations and incidence of other complications. Kaplan Meier curves were used to assess dislocation and failure for any reason. WOMAC was used to assess quality of life. At 10 years, the survival free of dislocation was 95.6% (95%CI 90- 98), and at 20 years to 90.6% (95% CI 81- 95.5). Eight patients (7.1%) had dislocations of their constrained liners: 1 patient had simultaneous periprosthetic infection identified at the time of open reduction, and 1 patient sustained stem fracture 3 months prior to the liner dislocation. At 10 years, the survival to any further surgery was 89.4% (95% CI 82–93.8), and at 20 years, this was 82.5 (95% CI 71.9–89.3). Five patients (4.4%) had deep infection: 4 of these had excision arthroplasty due to failure to control infection, while 1 patient was treated successfully with debridement, exchange of mobile components and intravenous antibiotics. Two patients (1.8%) had dissociated rings that required change of liner, ring and head. Two patients (1.8%) had periprosthetic femoral fractures that were treated by revision stems and exchange of constrained liners. The mean WOMAC functional and pain scores were 66.2 and 75.9 of 100, respectively. Constrained tripolar liners in our institute provided favourable results in the long term for recurrent dislocation hip arthroplasty with dysfunctional hip stabilizers. Infection in these patients can prove to be difficult to treat due to their poor soft tissue conditions from repeated surgeries. Comparing long terms results from other types of constrained liners is essential to evaluate these salvage liners

Abduction braces are commonly prescribed following the closed reduction of a dislocated prosthetic hip joint. Their use is controversial with limited evidence to support their use. We have conducted a retrospective review of dislocations in primary total hip replacements over a nine year period and report redislocation rates in patients braced, compared to those who were not. 67 patients were identified. 69% of those patients who were braced had a subsequent dislocation. Likewise 69% of those who did not receive a brace re-dislocated. 33% of patients that were braced dislocated whilst wearing the brace. Bracing was associated with patient discomfort, sleep disturbance, skin irritation and breakdown. Small femoral head size, monoblock femoral components and poor biomechanical reconstruction was prevalent amongst dislocators. Abduction bracing following closed reduction of a total hip replacement does not prevent redislocation and may be the cause of considerable morbidity to the patient

Background:. A shoulder dislocation is defined as chronic when it has been unreduced for more than one week. Chronic anterior shoulder dislocations are commonly encountered in Kwazulu-Natal for various reasons. Different surgical options exist to treat chronic anterior shoulder dislocations. However the outcome of surgically treated chronic shoulder dislocations has not been favourable in all studies. Methods:. We report on a combined case series of chronic anterior shoulder dislocations previously treated at Edendale Hospital (EDH), Pietermaritzburg and Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital (IALCH), Durban. Patients were identified retrospectively using departmental databases and their case files were retrieved. Patient demographics, duration of dislocation, mechanism of injury and reason for delayed treatment were recorded. When available, X-rays, CT scans and MRI scans were retrieved to identify associated bony and soft tissue pathology. Surgical outcome was assessed using range of movement (ROM), change in pain severity, patient satisfaction, as well as Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OIS) and Rowe and Zarins score. Post-operative complications including redislocations were also identified. Results:. Twenty-six patients with chronic anterior shoulder dislocations were surgically treated. The average duration of dislocation was 9 months (range 2 weeks to 7 years). The most common reason for chronicity was delayed presentation to clinic or hospital (9 patients). A Hill Sachs lesion was present in 20 patients, and a pseudo-glenoid was often encountered in dislocations present for more than 4 weeks (14 of 23 patients). Three supraspinatus ruptures and 4 biceps tears were encountered while neurological injury was uncommon (2 patients). Surgical treatment included open reduction (1 patient), open reduction and Latarjet (15 patients), hemi-arthroplasty (2 patients), hemi-arthroplasty and Latarjet (3 patients) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (5 patients). Eighteen patients were available for follow-up. Most patients (16 out of 18 patients) were satisfied with their outcome. This was due to improvement in pain. Regardless of the type of surgery done, post-operative range of motion and surgical outcome scores were generally poor. Two patients were unsatisfied, due to redislocations. Conclusion:. Surgical treatment of chronic anterior shoulder dislocations resulted in satisfactory pain relief but marginal improvement in range of motion and overall shoulder function

The aim of this study was to evaluate prospectively the outcome following arthroscopic Bankart repair using two types of suture anchors, absorbable and non-absorbable. Patients with a diagnosis of recurrent traumatic anterior instability of the shoulder, seen between April 2000 and June 2003 in a single unit, were considered for inclusion in the study. Patients were assessed pre-operatively and post-operatively using a subjective patient related outcome measurement tool (Oxford instability score), a visual analogue scale for pain and instability (VAS Pain and VAS instability) and a quality of life questionnaire (SF-12). The incidence of recurrent instability and the level of sporting ability were recorded. Patients were randomised to undergo surgical repair with either non-absorbable or absorbable anchors. 130 patients were included in the study. 6 patients were lost to follow-up and 124 patients (95%) completed the study. Both types of anchors were highly effective. There were no differences in the rate of recurrence or any of the scores between the two. Four patients in the non-absorbable group and 3 in the absorbable group experienced further episodes of dislocation after a traumatic event. The rate of redislocation in the whole series was therefore, 5.6%. In addition, 4 patients, all of them in the absorbable group (4%) described ongoing symptoms of instability but no true dislocations. 85% of the patients have returned to their previous level of sporting activity. There are no differences in the outcome of Arthroscopic Bankart repair using either absorbable or non-absorbable anchors. Both are highly effective, showing a redislocation rate of 5.6%

There are a multitude of studies internationally that have considered the rates of redislocation of shoulders, where, after first time anterior dislocation, initial management has consisted of an internal rotation sling immobiliser or no immobility. The majority of these have indicated poor results. This is in comparison with recurrence rates of dislocation, post shoulder stabilisation (arthroscopic or open), after first time anterior dislocation, which have demonstrated excellent results. The question remains, is there a non-operative alternative that will give similarly good results for these patients. A selection criteria was set up for use of the external rotation brace for first time anterior dislocators. Thirty-five patients were used that fit the criteria and were able to be followed over time. A physiotherapy program was initiated at the two-week stage in combination with clinic reviews. We encouraged use of the brace for six weeks in total, with removal only for hygiene purposes. At two years, post first time anterior dislocation, patients were reviewed clinically and a quick DASH score performed. Any recurrence of dislocation was recorded and an MRI was also undertaken to show residual injury. The compliance with the brace and physiotherapy program were excellent, with only one reported redislocation, during this period, in the 31 patients that were followed up. The majority of patients were functioning at predislocation levels at review and no one had required surgical intervention for instability. Quick-Dash results were also very good, with a vast majority scoring less than 2/100 level of disability. Conclusion. The external rotation brace with a Physiotherapy program is an excellent alternative to early shoulder stabilisation for first time anterior dislocators

The assessment of the long –term outcome (5 years) of patients treated with arthroscopic stabilization for acute traumatic patellar dislocation. From September 2004 until April 2009 we treated 29 patients (25 male, 4 female) with a median age of 18 years (range 14–23 years), two of them had suffered from traumatic dislocation of the patella of the other knee joint in the past. The median range from injury to our surgical intervention was 20 days (7–29 days). The return in sporting activities, the possible redislocation or joint instability and the subjective assessment of the symptoms of the patients, were evaluated in a 5 years follow-up. After 5 years, 23 patients (20 males, 3 females), were re-evaluated. After the arthroscopic medial retinacular repair all the patients return to sporting activities. All the patients presented chondral lesions at the medial facet of the patella and to the lateral femoral condyle and hemarthrosis too. The functional outcomes were evaluated with Kujala scoring scale, with Visual analog scale and Tenger scale the range of results was good. The acute arthroscopic repair of the medial retinacular ligaments, protects the patient from redislocation or subluxation, allows the evaluation and stabilisation of the chondral lesions, the removal of free chondral bodies, as well as the evaluation of the possible damage to the menisci or ACL, PCL ligaments. All the patients returned to normal sporting activity avoiding further injury, or the development of osteoarthritis of the knee joint

Bone defects are frequently observed in anterior shoulder instability. Over the last decade, knowledge of the association of bone loss with increased failure rates of soft-tissue repair has shifted the surgical management of chronic shoulder instability. On the glenoid side, there is no controversy about the critical glenoid bone loss being 20%. However, poor outcomes have been described even with a subcritical glenoid bone defect as low as 13.5%. On the humeral side, the Hill-Sachs lesion should be evaluated concomitantly with the glenoid defect as the two sides of the same bipolar lesion which interact in the instability process, as described by the glenoid track concept. We advocate adding remplissage to every Bankart repair in patients with a Hill-Sachs lesion, regardless of the glenoid bone loss. When critical or subcritical glenoid bone loss occurs in active patients (> 15%) or bipolar off-track lesions, we should consider anterior glenoid bone reconstructions. The techniques have evolved significantly over the last two decades, moving from open procedures to arthroscopic, and from screw fixation to metal-free fixation. The new arthroscopic techniques of glenoid bone reconstruction procedures allow precise positioning of the graft, identification, and treatment of concomitant injuries with low morbidity and faster recovery. Given the problems associated with bone resorption and metal hardware protrusion, the new metal-free techniques for Latarjet or free bone block procedures seem a good solution to avoid these complications, although no long-term data are yet available.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(10):1100–1110.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate prospectively the outcome following arthroscopic Bankart repair using two types of suture anchors, absorbable and non-absorbable. Method: Patients with a diagnosis of recurrent traumatic anterior instability of the shoulder, seen between April 2000 and June 2003, in a single unit were considered for inclusion in the study. Patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively using a subjective patient related outcome measurement tool (Oxford instability score), a visual analogue scale for pain and instability (VAS Pain and VAS instability) and a quality of life questionnaire (SF-12). Length of follow up was 1.5 to 5 years, mean 2.6 years. The incidence of recurrent instability and the level of sporting ability were recorded. Patients were randomised to undergo surgical repair with either non-absorbable or absorbable anchors. Results: 130 patients were included in the study. 6 patients were lost to follow up; therefore 124 patients (95%) completed the study. Both types of anchors were highly effective. There were no differences in the rate of recurrence or any of the scores between the two groups. 4 patients in the non-absorbable group and 3 in the absorbable group experienced further episodes of dislocation after a traumatic event: the rate of redislocation in the whole series was therefore 6%. In addition 4 patients, all of them in the absorbable group (4%,) described ongoing symptoms of instability but no true dislocations. 85% of the patients have returned to their previous level of sporting activity. Conclusions: There are no differences in the outcome of Arthroscopic Bankart repair using either absorbable or non-absorbable anchors. Both are highly effective, showing a redislocation rate of 5.6%