Introduction: The current techniques used for locking the distal end of intramedullary nails with cross screws remain a technical operative challenge for many clinicians. The surgeon uses his/her experience and judgement to locate the distal holes in the intramedullary nail, relying heavily on the use of two dimensional intra operative X-ray images (fluoroscopy) to undertake a three dimensional task. As a result, a large number of X-ray images are frequently required, significantly increasing the radiation exposure to both the patient and the operative team. Also there is an overall proportional increase in the operating time.

Aim: We aimed to develop a simple new radiological alignment jig that would allow the accurate placement of distal locking cross screws during intramedullary nailing, with minimal radiation exposure and without having to visualise the distal screw holes.

Materials and method: Laboratory tests were conducted using plastic femora (Sawbones Limited) fixed with intramedullary nails. Tests were performed three times using each of the different femoral intramedullary nails (Russell-Taylor, Smith & Nephew) investigating whether the length or diameter of the nail had any influence upon the accuracy of distal screw insertion. After successfully concluding the laboratory tests, a limited clinical study was conducted using the new alignment jig to insert distal locking screws in patients.

Results: Both the bench tests and limited clinical study were 100% successful and permitted the clinician to identify the distal holes correctly without needing to visualise the distal screw holes radiologically.

Conclusion: Our initial bench tests and clinical study show that the new alignment jig allows simple and accurate insertion of the distal locking screws with minimal radiological guidance. It also has considerable potential to reduce the overall operating time.

Introduction and Purpose. Metacarpal fractures constitute approximately one third of all hand fractures. The majority of these fractures are treated by conservative non-surgical methods. The aim of this study is to obtain the appropriate anatomical alignment of the fracture with dynamic metacarpal stabilization splint (DMSS) and to maintain the proper bone anatomy until the union is achieved. In addition, by comparing this method with short arm plaster splint (SAPS) application, it is aimed to evaluate whether patients are superior in terms of comfort, range of motion (ROM) and grip strength. Materials and Methods. In our study, SAPS or DMSS was applied to the patients with 5th metacarpal neck fracture randomly after fracture reduction and followed for 3 months. A total of 119 patients with appropriate criteria were included in the study. Radiological alignment of the fracture and amount of joint movements were evaluated during follow-up. Grip strength was evaluated with Jamar dynamometer. EQ-5D-5L and VAS scores were used for clinical evaluation. Results. 103 patients completed their follow-up. 51 patients were treated with SAPS and 52 patients were treated with DMSS. The mean age of the SAPS was 29.5 (SD ± 9.4; 16–53 years) and the mean age of the DMSS group was 27.8 (SD ± 11.6; 16–63). Pressure sores was seen in 5 patients in the DMSS group, while no pressure sore was seen in the SAPS (p = 0.008). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the VAS scores at all times. There was no significant difference between the mean dorsal cortical angulation (DCA) before the reduction, after the reduction and at the third month follow-ups. There was no statistically significant difference between the length of metacarps at first admittion before reduction, after reduction and at third month follow-ups. When the grip strength of the two groups were compared as a percentage, the grip strength of the patients in the DMSS group was found to be higher at 1st month, 2nd month and 3rd month (p <0.001). When the ROM values of the patients were evaluated, DMSS group had a higher degree of ROM in the first month compared to the SAPS group (p <0.001). No statistically significant difference was detected among groups at third month in the ROM of the IP and MP joints. However, wrist ROM was statistically higher in DMSS group at 3rd month (p <0.05). There was a statistically significant difference between EuroQol scores in favor of DMSA group (p <0.05). Discussion and Conclusion. In stable 5th metacarpal neck fractures, DMSA is as effective as SAPS to maintain bone anatomy. In addition, DMSA can be preferred for fixation plaster splint or circular plaster applications for the prevention of reduction in boxer fractures, with the advantage of having high clinical scores, which is an indication of early acquisition of grip strength, ease of use and patient comfort