Introduction The radial nerve is at risk in arthroscopic elbow surgery and there are reports of significant nerve injury, particularly with arthroscopic synovectomy or arthroscopic capsulectomy for the stiff elbow. This study was aimed to further define the relationship of the radial nerve to the elbow joint. Methods Magnetic Resonance Imaging studies of 23 elbows with minimal or no pathology were used to measure the distance of the radial nerve from the border of the radial head and the position of the nerve relative to the bony landmarks of the elbow joint. Results The radial nerve or its branches were found to lie on average 6.6 mm from the border of the radial head (range 3 to 9 mm) and in an arc of 64° antero-lateral to the radial head. At the level of the radial head the nerve was not separated from capsule by muscle in 12 of the 23 elbows. Conclusions Care should be taken in the insertion of antero-lateral portals in elbow arthroscopy as the position of the radial nerve and its branches is variable. Arthroscopic synovectomy and capsulectomy should be carried out above the level of the radial head where the nerve is protected by brachialis to avoid permanent damage to the radial nerve

A radial nerve palsy complicates 1.8 to 17% (mean 11%) diaphyseal humeral fractures (13.7% in our series of 156 humeral fractures and nonunions treated by external fixation – Tsiagadigui, 2000). In about 75%, it is a primary lesion, related to the fracture before any attempt at treatment. In 60%, the fracture, most commonly with an oblique fracture line, involves the middle third. In children, a supracondylar fracture may be complicated by radial nerve palsy. Most nerve lesions correspond to neurapraxia or axonotmesis, due to traction or compression associated with bone angular deformity. Unfrequently, the nerve is impaled or severed by bone fragments, or may be trapped within the fracture in case of a spiral oblique middle or distal third humeral fracture with lateral displacement of the distal fragment. Iatrogenic injury during internal fixation or entrapment within periosteal callus are occasionally observed. The classical indications for early radial nerve exploration include open fractures requiring surgical debridement, or fractures with vascular compromise, or when the osteosynthesis is done by a plate. In all other cases, we recommend to investigate the integrity of the radial nerve by echography. In the absence of discontinuity, spontaneous neurological recovery is likely to occur and is monitored clinically and by electromyography; prevention of joint contracture is done by physiotherapy and by a wrist splint, maintaining the joint in slight dorsiflexion. In case of persistent palsy, neurolysis is indicated several months after the initial injury, the precise delay depending on the level of the fracture. Palliative treatment by tendon transfers offers in cases of persistent palsy excellent functional results. Tendon transfers may be indicated early after the fracture, in case of an irreparable radial nerve lesion

Objective: The primary aim was to describe the epidemiology of the Holstein-Lewis humeral shaft fracture, its association with radial nerve palsy and the outcome regarding recovery from the radial nerve palsy and fracture healing. The secondary aim was to analyze the long-term functional outcome. Setting: Six major hospitals in Stockholm County. Design: Descriptive study. Retrospective assessment of radial nerve recovery and fracture healing. Prospective assessment of functional outcome. Patients: All 27 patients with a 12A1.3 humeral shaft fracture according to the OTA classification satisfying the criteria of a Holstein-Lewis fracture in a population of 358 consecutive patients with 361 traumatic humeral shaft fractures. Intervention: Nonoperative or operative treatment according to the decision of the attending orthopedic surgeon. Main Outcome Measurements: Recovery of the radial nerve, fracture healing and functional outcome according to the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA). Results: The Holstein-Lewis humeral shaft fracture constituted 7.5% of all humeral shaft fractures and was associated with an increased risk of acute radial nerve palsy compared to other types of humeral shaft fractures, 22% versus 8% (p< 0.05). The fractures of six of the seven operatively treated patients healed after the primary surgical procedure while one fracture healed after revision surgery. The fractures of all patients treated nonoperatively healed without any further intervention. All six radial nerve palsies (two patients treated nonoperatively and four operatively) recovered. The functional outcome according to the SMFA was good with no differences between the nonoperatively and operatively treated patients: SMFA dysfunction index 7.6 and 9.7, respectively, and SMFA bother index 6.1 and 6.8, respectively. Conclusion: The Holstein-Lewis humeral shaft fracture was associated with a significantly increased risk of acute radial nerve palsy. The overall outcome regarding fracture healing, radial nerve recovery, and function is excellent regardless of the primary treatment modality, i.e. operative or nonoperative treatment. The indication for primary operative intervention in this fracture type appears to be relative

Thermal injury to the radial nerve caused by cement leakage is a rare complication after revision elbow arthroplasty. Several reports have described nerve palsy caused by cement leakage after hip arthroplasty. However, little information is available regarding whether radial nerve injury due to cement leakage after humeral stem revision will recover. In a recent study, radial nerve palsy occurred in 2 of 7 patients who had thermal injury from leaked cement during humeral component revisions. These patients did not regain function of the radial nerve after observation. We present a case of functional recovery from a radial nerve palsy caused by cement leakage after immediate nerve decompression in revision elbow arthroplasty[Fig. 1.2]

Purpose: The radial nerve raises several problems during plate fixation of the mid third of the humerus because of its particular anatomic position. Translocation of the radial nerve has been proposed to distend the nerve. There have been few studies studying the feasibility of translocation. The purpose of our work was to validate the translocation effect on nerve distension and the status of the translocated radial nerve branches. Materials and methods: We report an anatomic study of six cases. These patients had recent communitive fractures of the mid third of the humerus with immediate radial paralysis in three cases. The anterolateral approach was used to expose the nerves that were found to be continuous. Nerve translocation then plate fixation were achieved without neurolysis. The anatomic study was conducted on 15 cadavers: the distance between the last branch for the triceps and the first epicondylar motor branch was calculated in three positions: D0: mean distance in the anatomic position of the nerve; D1: mean distance of the nerve in the anatomic position with the plate; D2: mean distance after anterior translocation of the nerve. We provoked shaft fractures in the mid and lower third of the humerus and evaluated the sensorial and motor branches after translocation. Results: In this clinical series, translocation was easily achieved in all cases without stretching the sensorial or motor branches. The three radial paralyses recovered in six months. There was not postoperative paralysis for the other cases. For the anatomy study, mean measurements for D0, D1, and D2 were 112, 116 and 106 mm, for a 10 mm gain between D2 and D1. The sensorial branch was stretched making the technique difficult in one case. Discussion: The results of these two studies confirm the effect of radial nerve distension that facilitates fixation. It frees the posterior aspect of the humerus allowing access in case of nonunion. However, the translocation should be done without neurolysis of the radial nerve and after informed consent from the patient. Conclusion: Anteromedial translocation of the radial nerve appears to be useful for fractures of the humerus. The ideal indication is an oblique fracture of the mid or lower third of the humeral shaft with immediate radial palsy. A certain degree of comminution facilitates the translocation

Among the most popular techniques for the management of radial nerve palsy is the transfer of the Pronator Teres (PT) to the Extensor Carpi Radialis Brevis (ECRB), of the Flexor Carpi Radialis (FCR) to the Extensor Digitorum Communis (EDC) and of the Palmaris Longus (PL) to rerouted Extensor Pollicis Longus (EPL). This retrospective study was undertaken to assess the outcome of flexor carpi radialis transfer in the treatment of radial nerve palsy. Twenty patients with a mean age of 36 years were included in this study. Surgical management, as described above, was decided since all patients had irreparable damage to the nerve. Parameters that were assessed included range of wrist motion, dynamic power of wrist flexion and extension, and radial and ulnar deviation and function. The average follow-up was 4.5 years. Compared to a control group of 10 volunteers of similar characteristics, all patients achieved a functional range of motion and satisfactory power of wrist motion. All patients returned to their previous occupation. Transfer of Flexor Carpi Radialis tendon for irreparable radial nerve palsy yields satisfactory results. Therefore, it can be expected that patients will obtain a functional range of motion as well as an adequate strength of motion

Aim: The aim of the study is to present our experience in the treatment of radial nerve palsy due to humeral fracture. Material and methods: During the last 4 years, we treated 10 patients with humeral fractures associated with radial nerve palsy. Seven patients were men and 3 were women (mean age 47.8 yrs, range 29–68 yrs). All fractures were closed. Three fractures were transverse, 4 were oblique and 3 were comminuted. Nerve palsy was present at admission in 8 cases while in 2 cases it appeared after closed reduction manipulations. The latter was considered as an indication for early surgical exploration. Three out of the rest 8 patients were explored because the fracture was comminuted. The remaining five patients were treated initially conservatively. In 3 of them closed reduction failed and the patients were also operated. In total, 2 of the patients were treated with closed reduction. Results: All fractures were united. During exploration no serious injury was found. All patients had complete return of nerve function within 8 months. Conclusions: Because no serious injury of the nerve was found during exploration and recovery was complete, surgical treatment could have been avoided. Conservative treatment should be the initial treatment of choice

Purpose: Radial paralysis is a major complication of humeral shaft fractures. In most cases, the paralysis is regressive but in certain patients surgical repair is required to achieve full neurological recovery. We reviewed retrospectively our patients to determine the causes of non-recovery and evaluate the efficacy of different treatments. Material and methods: Thirty patients were operated between 1990 and 1997 for radial nerve paralysis that was observed immediately after trauma or developed secondarily. Mean follow-up after surgery was 6.3 years. There were 22 men and 8 women, 16 right side and 14 left side. Mean delay from injury to surgery was four months (0–730 days). Elements that could be involved in radial paralysis were noted: type of fracture, level of the fracture, treatment, approach, material used. There were ten cases with non-union. Neurological recovery at three years was assessed with muscle tests and with the Alnot criteria. An electrical recording was also made in certain patients. Surgery involved neurolysis in 23 cases, nerve grafts in five and tendon transfers in two. Results: Outcome was very good and good in 22 patients, good in one and could not be evaluated in one (tendon transfer). There were three failures (two neurolysis and one graft) and two patients were lost to follow-up. After neurolysis, mean delay to recovery was seven months; it was 15 months after nerve grafts. Recovery always occurred proximally to distally. Discussion: Radial paralysis after femoral shaft fracture regresses spontaneously in 76% to 89% of the cases, depending on the series. There is a predominance in the 20 to 30 year age range. Several factors could be involved in radial paralysis (fracture of the distal third of the humerus, spiral fracture, plate fixation, nonunion). The anterolateral approach allows a better exposure of the nerve. Unlike other authors, we do no advocate exploration of the injured nerve during surgical treatment of the fracture because it is most difficult to determine the potential for recovery of a continuous nerve. Conclusion: The risk of radial nerve paralysis is greatest for spiral fracture of the distal third of the humerus. In such cases, it may be useful to explore the nerve during the primary procedure and insert a plate. For other cases, we prefer to wait for spontaneous nerve recovery. If reinnervation is not observed at 100 days, we undertake exploration

In combined high median and ulnar nerve injury, transfer of extensor digiti minimi (EDM) and extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) nerve branches to restore intrinsic hand function is previously described. A segment of nerve graft is required in this operation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using the sensory branch of radial nerve (SRN) as an “in situ vascular nerve bridge'” (IVNB) instead of sural nerve graft. Twenty fresh cadavers were dissected. In proximal forearm incision, the feasibility of transferring the EDM/ECU branches to the distal stump of transected SRN was evaluated. In distal forearm incision, the two distal branches of the SRN were transected near the radial styloid process to determine whether transfer of the proximal stumps of these branches to the motor branches of the median (MMN) and ulnar (MUN) nerves is possible. The number of axons in each nerve was determined. The size of the dissected nerves and their location demonstrate that tension free nerve coaptation is easily possible in both proximal and distal incisions. Utilisation of the SRN as an IVNB instead of the conventional sural nerve graft has some advantages. Firstly, the sural nerve graft is a single branch and could be sutured to either the MMN or MUN, whereas the SRN has two terminal branches and can address both of them. Secondly, the IVNB has live Schwann cells and may accelerate the regeneration. Finally, this IVNB does not require leg incision and could be performed under regional anesthesia. The SRN as an IVNB is a viable option which can be used instead of conventional nerve graft in some brachial plexus or high median and ulnar nerve injuries when restoration of intrinsic hand function by transfer of EDM/ECU branches is attempted

Helical plates are preferably used for proximal humeral shaft fracture fixation and potentially avoid radial nerve irritation as compared to straight plates. Aims:(1) to investigate the safety of applying different long plate designs (straight, 45°-, 90°-helical and ALPS) in MIPO-technique to the humerus. (2) to assess and compare their distances to adjacent anatomical structures at risk. MIPO was performed in 16 human cadaveric humeri using either a straight plate (group1), a 45°-helical (group2), a 90°-helical (group3) or an ALPS (group4). Using CT-angiography, distances between brachial arteries and plates were evaluated. Following, all specimens were dissected, and distances to the axillary, radial and musculocutaneous nerve were evaluated. None of the specimens demonstrated injuries of the anatomical structures at risk after MIPO with all investigated plate designs. Closest overall distance (mm(range)) between each plate and the radial nerve was 1(1-3) in group1, 7(2-11) in group2, 14(7-25) in group3 and 6(3-8) in group4. It was significantly longer in group3 and significantly shorter in group1 as compared to all other groups, p<0.001. Closest overall distance (mm(range)) between each plate and the musculocutaneous nerve was 16(8-28) in group1, 11(7-18) in group2, 3(2-4) in group3 and 6(3-8) in group4. It was significantly longer in group1 and significantly shorter in group3 as compared to all other groups, p<0.001. Closest overall distance (mm(range)) between each plate and the brachial artery was 21(18-23) in group1, 7(6-7) in group2, 4(3-5) in group3 and 7(6-7) in group4. It was significantly longer in group1 and significantly shorter in group3 as compared to all other groups, p<0.021. MIPO with 45°- and 90°-helical plates as well as ALPS is safely feasible and showed a significant greater distance to the radial nerve compared to straight plates. However, distances remain low, and attention must be paid to the musculocutaneous nerve and the brachial artery when MIPO is used with ALPS, 45°- and 90°-helical implants. Anterior parts of the deltoid insertion will be detached using 90°-helical and ALPS implants in MIPO-technique

Fractures of the humeral diaphysis occur in a bimodal distribution and represent 3-5% of all fractures. Presently, the standard treatment of isolated humeral diaphyseal fractures is nonoperative care using splints, braces, and slings. Recent data has questioned the effectiveness of this strategy in ensuring fracture healing and optimal patient function. The primary objective of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to assess whether operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures with a plate and screw construct provides a better functional outcome than nonoperative treatment. Secondary objectives compared union rates and both clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Eligible patients with an isolated, closed humeral diaphyseal fracture were randomized to either nonoperative care (initial sugar-tong splint, followed by functional coaptation brace) or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF; plate and screw construct). The primary outcome measure was the Disability Shoulder, Arm, Hand (DASH) score assessed at 2-, 6-, 16-, 24-, and 52-weeks. Secondary outcomes included the Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA), the Constant Shoulder Score, range of motion (ROM), and radiographic parameters. Independent samples t-tests and Chi-squared analyses were used to compare treatment groups. The DASH, SMFA, and Constant Score were modelled over time using a multiple variable mixed effects model. A total of 180 patients were randomized, with 168 included in the final analysis. There were 84 patients treated nonoperatively and 84 treated with ORIF. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups for age (mean = 45.4 years, SD 16.5 for nonoperative group and 41.7, SD 17.2 years for ORIF group; p=0.16), sex (38.1% female in nonoperative group and 39.3% female in ORIF group; p=0.87), body mass index (mean = 27.8, SD 8.7 for nonoperative group and 27.2, SD 6.2 for ORIF group; p=0.64), or smoking status (p=0.74). There was a significant improvement in the DASH scores at 6 weeks in the ORIF group compared to the nonoperative group (mean=33.8, SD 21.2 in the ORIF group vs. mean=56.5, SD=21.1 in the nonoperative group; p < 0 .0001). At 4 months, the DASH scores were also significantly better in the ORIF group (mean=21.6, SD=19.7 in the ORIF group vs. mean=31.6, SD=24.6 in the nonoperative group; p=0.009. However, there was no difference in DASH scores at 12-month follow-up between the groups (mean=8.8,SD=10.9 vs. mean=11.0, SD=16.9 in the nonoperative group; p=0.39). Males had improved DASH scores at all timepoints compared with females. There was significantly quicker time to union (p=0.016) and improved position (p < 0 .001) in the ORIF group. There were 13 (15.5%) nonunions in the nonoperative group and four (4.7%) combined superficial and deep infections in the ORIF group. There were seven radial nerve palsies in the nonoperative group and five (a single iatrogenic) radial nerve palsies in the ORIF group. This large RCT comparing operative and nonoperative treatment of humeral diaphyseal fractures found significantly improved functional outcome scores in patients treated surgically at 6 weeks and 4 months. However, the early functional improvement did not persist at the 12-month follow-up. There was a 15.5% nonunion rate, which required surgical intervention, in the nonoperative group and a similar radial nerve palsy rate between groups

Fractures of the humeral diaphysis occur in a bimodal distribution and represent 3-5% of all fractures. Presently, the standard treatment of isolated humeral diaphyseal fractures is nonoperative care using splints, braces, and slings. Recent data has questioned the effectiveness of this strategy in ensuring fracture healing and optimal patient function. The primary objective of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to assess whether operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures with a plate and screw construct provides a better functional outcome than nonoperative treatment. Secondary objectives compared union rates and both clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Eligible patients with an isolated, closed humeral diaphyseal fracture were randomized to either nonoperative care (initial sugar-tong splint, followed by functional coaptation brace) or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF; plate and screw construct). The primary outcome measure was the Disability Shoulder, Arm, Hand (DASH) score assessed at 2-, 6-, 16-, 24-, and 52-weeks. Secondary outcomes included the Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA), the Constant Shoulder Score, range of motion (ROM), and radiographic parameters. Independent samples t-tests and Chi-squared analyses were used to compare treatment groups. The DASH, SMFA, and Constant Score were modelled over time using a multiple variable mixed effects model. A total of 180 patients were randomized, with 168 included in the final analysis. There were 84 patients treated nonoperatively and 84 treated with ORIF. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups for age (mean = 45.4 years, SD 16.5 for nonoperative group and 41.7, SD 17.2 years for ORIF group; p=0.16), sex (38.1% female in nonoperative group and 39.3% female in ORIF group; p=0.87), body mass index (mean = 27.8, SD 8.7 for nonoperative group and 27.2, SD 6.2 for ORIF group; p=0.64), or smoking status (p=0.74). There was a significant improvement in the DASH scores at 6 weeks in the ORIF group compared to the nonoperative group (mean=33.8, SD 21.2 in the ORIF group vs. mean=56.5, SD=21.1 in the nonoperative group; p < 0 .0001). At 4 months, the DASH scores were also significantly better in the ORIF group (mean=21.6, SD=19.7 in the ORIF group vs. mean=31.6, SD=24.6 in the nonoperative group; p=0.009. However, there was no difference in DASH scores at 12-month follow-up between the groups (mean=8.8,SD=10.9 vs. mean=11.0, SD=16.9 in the nonoperative group; p=0.39). Males had improved DASH scores at all timepoints compared with females. There was significantly quicker time to union (p=0.016) and improved position (p < 0 .001) in the ORIF group. There were 13 (15.5%) nonunions in the nonoperative group and four (4.7%) combined superficial and deep infections in the ORIF group. There were seven radial nerve palsies in the nonoperative group and five (a single iatrogenic) radial nerve palsies in the ORIF group. This large RCT comparing operative and nonoperative treatment of humeral diaphyseal fractures found significantly improved functional outcome scores in patients treated surgically at 6 weeks and 4 months. However, the early functional improvement did not persist at the 12-month follow-up. There was a 15.5% nonunion rate, which required surgical intervention, in the nonoperative group and a similar radial nerve palsy rate between groups

Introduction:. Distal humerus fractures as well as elbow fracture dislocation are often accompanied by soft tissue damage that warrants early fixation with an external fixator. The distal humerus is a hazardous area for placement of an external fixator due to the close proximity of the radial nerve to the humerus in this area. No known safe zone has been identified on the lateral border of the humerus to avoid radial nerve damage. The aim of this study was to record the incidence of radial nerve damage by placing two 4 mm pins into the humerus and to note the relation of the nerve to the pins. Methods:. Two 4 mm pins used to fix an external fixator were drilled into the lateral border of the humerus at points 100 mm and 70 mm proximal to the lateral epicondyle of both arms of 39 cadavers. The 30 mm interval between the pins is the interval between the pins in a pinblock of a commonly-used external fixator. The arms were dissected by medical students and the incidence of radial nerve damage was recorded. Statistical analysis was done using a Fischer's exact test to identify the incidence of nerve damage relative to pin insertion. The number of damaged nerves was compared to the number of non-damaged nerves. A design based Chi Square test was carried out to test left and right arms. The proportions of interest were estimated along a 95% confidence interval. Results:. The radial nerve was hit (damaged) by 56.4% of the proximal and 20.5% of the distal pins. The radial nerve ran posterior to the proximal pin in 2.57% of arms and 0% to the distal pin. Conclusion:. Although no clear safe zone could be established, pins should be placed closer than 100 mm from the lateral epicondyle and as posterior on the humerus as possible to minimize the risk for radial nerve damage. Keywords: Radial nerve, external fixation, humerus fractures

Abstract. Background. Reconstruction following resection of sarcomas of the upper extremity with methods described in the prevalent literature may not be possible in few selected cases. We describe Surgical Phocomelia or Phoco-reduction as a method of limb salvage in such cases of extensive sarcomas of the upper limb with its functional and oncological outcomes. Methods. Evaluation of functional and oncological outcomes was performed for 11 patients who underwent surgical phocomelia or phocoreduction for extensive sarcomas of the upper limb between 2010 and 2019. Results. Mean follow-up period in the study was27.8 months. Five patients required a segmental resection including the entire humerus while 6 patients underwent segmental resection around the elbow with a mean resection length of 21.5 cm. Mean MSTS 93 score was 22 depicting a good functional outcome. Mean hand grip strength on the operated side was 62% of the contralateral side with preservation of useful hand function. Mean time to humero-ulnar union was 6.7 months. Radial nerve palsy and implant failure occurred in 1 patient each. No patient developed local recurrence while 3 patients died of metastasis. Conclusion. Surgical phocomelia is a prudent alternative to severely incapacitating amputations in situations where other reconstruction methods are not feasible

Proximal humeral shaft fractures are commonly treated with long straight locking plates endangering the radial nerve distally. The aim of this study was to investigate the biomechanical competence in a human cadaveric bone model of 90°-helical PHILOS plates versus conventional straight PHILOS plates in proximal third comminuted humeral shaft fractures. Eight pairs of humeral cadaveric humeri were instrumented using either a long 90°-helical plate (group1) or a straight long PHILOS plate (group2). An unstable proximal humeral shaft fracture was simulated by means of an osteotomy maintaining a gap of 5cm. All specimens were tested under quasi-static loading in axial compression, internal and external rotation as well as bending in 4 directions. Subsequently, progressively increasing internal rotational loading until failure was applied and interfragmentary movements were monitored by means of optical motion tracking. Flexion/extension deformation (°) in group1 was (2.00±1.77) and (0.88±1.12) in group2, p=0.003. Varus/valgus deformation (°) was (6.14±1.58) in group1 and (6.16±0.73) in group2, p=0.976. Shear (mm) and displacement (°) under torsional load were (1.40±0.63 and 8.96±0.46) in group1 and (1.12±0.61 and 9.02±0.48) in group2, p≥0.390. However, during cyclic testing shear and torsional displacements and torsion were both significantly higher in group 1, p≤0.038. Cycles to catastrophic failure were (9960±1967) in group1 and (9234±1566) in group2, p=0.24. Although 90°-helical plating was associated with improved resistance against varus/valgus deformation, it demonstrated lower resistance to flexion/extension and internal rotation as well as higher flexion/extension, torsional and shear movements compared to straight plates. From a biomechanical perspective, 90°-helical plates performed inferior compared to straight plates and alternative helical plate designs with lower twist should be investigated in future paired cadaveric studies

Proximal humeral shaft fractures are commonly treated with long straight plates or intramedullary nails. Helical plates might overcome the downsides of these techniques as they are able to avoid the radial nerve distally. The aim of this study was to investigate in an artificial bone model: (1) the biomechanical competence of different plate designs and (2) to compare them against the alternative treatment option of intramedullary nails. Twenty-four artificial humeri were assigned in 4 groups and instrumented as follows: group1 (straight 10-hole-PHILOS), group2 (MULTILOCK-nail), group3 (45°-helical-PHILOS) and group4 (90°-helical-PHILOS). An unstable proximal humeral shaft fracture was simulated. Specimens were tested under quasi-static loading in axial compression, internal/external rotation and bending in 4 directions monitored by optical motion tracking. Axial displacement (mm) was significantly lower in group2 (0.1±0.1) compared to all other groups (1: 3.7±0.6; 3: 3.8±0.8; 4: 3.5±0.4), p<0.001. Varus stiffness in group2 (0.8±0.1) was significantly higher compared to groups1+3, p≤0.013 (1: 0.7±0.1; 3: 0.7±0.1; 4: 0.8±0.1). Varus bending (°) was significantly lower in group2 compared to all other groups (p<0.001) and group4 to group1, p=0.022. Flexion stiffness in group1 was significantly higher compared to groups2+4 (p≤0,03) and group4 to group1, p≤0,029 (1: 0.8±0.1; 2: 0.7±0.1; 3: 0.7±0.1; 4: 0.6±0.1). Flexion bending (°) in group4 was higher compared to all other groups (p≤0.024) and lower in group2 compared to groups1+4, p≤0.024. Torsional stiffness remained non significantly different, p≥0.086. Torsional deformation in group2 was significantly higher compared to all other groups, p≤0.017. Shear displacement remained non significantly different, p≥0.112. From a biomechanical perspective, helical plating with 45° and 90° may be considered as a valid alternative fixation technique to standard straight plating of proximal third humeral fractures. Intramedullary nails demonstrated higher axial and bending stiffness as well as lower fracture gap movements during axial loading compared to all plate designs. However, despite similar torsional stiffness they were associated with higher torsional movements during internal/external rotation as compared to all investigated plate designs

Introduction. Fully implantable distraction nails are frequently used for lengthening of the lower leg. What are the indications for humerus lengthening and which results can be expected?. Materials and Methods. The humerus as the best healing bone in the human body is suitable for lengthening with a nail as well but the indications are rare in comparison with the lower legs. Especially when driving a car or when working on a tablet length discrepancy of the arms of more than 4–5cm may cause severe hardening of the cervical muscles and induce chronical pain in the upper spine. Results. A distraction nail (FITBONE) was used in 5 cases for humerus lengthening. The nail was inserted in all cases from proximal. The mean age of the patients was 34 years. The mean lengthening amount was 58mm (55–100). In one case the system was exchanged to reach the desired length. There was no infection, no radial nerve irritation and no chronical shoulder pain. The system was removed in 4 cases in an average of 15 months the other nail will be removed soon as well. Conclusions. The preliminary results of our 5 cases demonstrate, that the FITBONE device is advantageous for lengthening the humerus, if the initial length is sufficient for implantation. In comparison with the use of external fixators the functional outcome, the comfort of treatment and the cosmetic result is amazing

Introduction: The treatment of complex distal humeral shaft fractures is a challenge due to the fact that intramedullary nails do not present reliable results, while the ORIF with plates is associated with a higher morbidity. The purpose of this study is to exhibit the advantages of MIPO by anterior approach in distal humeral shaft fractures. Material and methods: 6 fractures in 6 patients (with arm wrestling mechanism in 3 cases) were operated by indirect reduction and biological plating, avoiding the problems related to the neural vascular structures of the arm and especially to the radial nerve. According to AO classification, there were 1 fracture type 12A, 2 type 12B and 3 type 12C. The proximal approach of 3–5 cm was realized between the biceps (medially) and deltoid muscle (laterally). The distal approach of 3–5 cm was performed by subperiosteal dissection of the lateral supracondylar ridge of the humerus, with retraction of brachioradialis and long carpal extensor muscle, as well as the radial nerve, even though unseen. A DCP plate of 4,5 mm with 10–12 holes was molded and twisted medially to adapt to the anterior face of the humeral lateral column and diaphysis, thus avoiding occlusion of the coronoid or of the olecranon fossae. The plate was inserted from distal to proximal and fixed onto the shaft with at least 2 proximal and 2 distal screws, after reestablishing the humeral axis, length and rotation. After a short immobilization (1–2 weeks), the patient started rehabilitation. Results: There were no vascular or nerve complications except a transient paresthesia for the radial nerve. All fractures healed within a mean time of 10 weeks after surgery, with good functional results regarding elbow mobility. Discussions: The radial nerve may be endangered in the lateral column approach but even in such circumstances its identification is not required; the implant remains in the safe zone. Conclusions: The authors are promoting the advantages of this technique regarding safety and feasibility as well as plate stability which allows a fast rehabilitation. Even if it is a demanding technique, MIPO seems to be the best option for distal third humeral fractures

Aim: To present and analysis the neurological complications after ORIF with plates of bicondylar fractures of the humerus. Material and Methods: For the period 1996 – 2003 77 bicondylar fractures were operated with plates. All of them were followed up. 36 Man and 41 women. Dominant hand was affected in 43 patients. The AO types were C1- 25, C2 – 28, C3 – 24. There were 18 open fractures (I–II degree). High-energy trauma caused 19 fractures. 14 were with associated ipsilateral fractures of the upper limb. All patients were operated by the standard AO technique. In all patients the ulnar nerve was identified. There was no case where the radial nerve was exposed. In 36 patients the nerve was transposed anteriorly subcutaneosly and for the rest it was not. Results: We observed 20 postoperative ulnar and radial nerve disfunctions (19 ulnar nerve and 1 radial nerve disfunctions). Electromiography was performed in all cases. 7 of 36 (with transposition) cases finished with temporary ulnar nerve palsy. 3 of 41 (without transposition) cases finished with permanent ulnar nerve palsy and the other 9 of 41 finished with temporary disfunction. The disfunction of the radial nerve was temporary. The temporary neurological disfunctions recovered completely for 3–7 months. Neurolysis and anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve was performed in the cases with permanent ulnar nerve palsy. Conclusions: We suggest that ulnar nerve transposition is a method of choice in operative treatment of bicondylar fractures of the humerus. Careful management of the ulnar nerve is mandatory. Meticulous soft-tissue dissection and hemostasis help to prevent perineural fibrosis

Introduction. Treatment for distal third shaft fractures of humerus is very challenging. They are commonly treated with plating. Plating has complications of iatrogenic radial nerve palsy. We report our case series of distal third fractures of humerus treated with retrograde Halder Humeral Nail. Materials/Methods. Since 1994 to 2010 we have 576 fractures of humerus treated with retrograde Halder Humeral nail. Of these 45 fractures were distal third of humerus. Average age of patients at the time of surgery was 30.4 years (Range 15–82 years, Median 33 years). Of 45 patients 26 were females and 19 males. Three out of 45 had non union at the time of presentation. All patients were followed until clinical and radiological signs of union. One patient was lost to follow-up. Results. Average time to fracture healing was 13.9 weeks (Range 9–36 weeks). There were two cases of non union, one healed at 9 months with 2. nd. surgery. There was one reported case of infection. Seven patients had nail removal electively. All the patients achieved full range of elbow and shoulder movement. No reported cases of iatrogenic radial nerve palsy. Conclusion. Our results of distal third fractures of humerus treated with retrograde Halder Humeral Nail are excellent. It avoids big exposure as needed in plating and complication of iatrogenic radial nerve palsy