To compare hallux valgus surgery performed by orthopaedic surgeons and podiatrists within the same Health Authority, a consecutive series of 50 patients operated on within the orthopaedic department for hallux valgus was compared with a group operated on by the podiatry surgeons within the same time period. This retrospective study was performed by analysis of the case notes and radiographs. Data was collected on patient age, sex, comorbidity, anaesthetic, surgery, surgeon grade, post-operative rehabilitation and complications. Pre and post operative hallux valgus and intermetatarsal angles were measured. Patient demographics showed no significant difference between the 2 groups. All but one patient in the orthopaedic group had a general anaesthetic whilst regional anaesthesia (ankle block) performed by the operating surgeon was used in all cases in the podiatry group. There were 4 different operations in the orthopaedic group (Mitchells, Chevron, bunionectomy, Wilsons) compared with 2 in the podiatry group (Scarf, Kellers). Pre-operative radiological measurements revealed comparable groups with the correction obtained better in the podiatry group (HV angle 15° vs 10°; IM angle 7° vs 4°). There were 13 complications in the podiatry group compared with 8 in the orthopaedic group. 9 patients in the podiatry group underwent re-operation to remove metalwork whilst no patients in the orthopaedic group required further surgery. Within our region, orthopaedic and podiatry surgeons operate on the same type of patients with hallux valgus in respect to age, sex, comorbidity and radiological abnormality. There is marked difference in the anaesthetic techniques used. Correction obtained in the podiatry group was slightly better but at the expense of a higher complication and re-operation rate

Purpose: An audit was undertaken to evaluate the patients’ experience of foot surgery at the great Western Hospital in 2004 following the appointment of a podiatric surgeon to the orthopaedic department. Method: The first 100 patients that were operated on by the podiatric surgeon (Group 1) were matched by OPCS code to a randomly selected patient cohort that had been operated on by orthopaedic surgeons (Group 2). All patients were at a minimum of 6 months post-surgery (range 6–10 months Gp. 1, 11–20 months Gp. 2). The audit department sent out an anonymous questionnaire relating to the patients’ experience both before and after their surgery as well as current levels of satisfaction with the outcome of their surgery. Results: The response rate was 64% in Gp.1 and 68% in Gp.2. The patients’ overall satisfaction with the result of their foot surgery was determined using a Likert scale and the results can be seen in Table 1. Patients in the podiatric surgical group were significantly more satisfied with the result of their foot surgery than those in the orthopaedic group (p< 0.008; Mann Whitney U test). Similar statistically significant differences were also seen between the two groups relating to patient satisfaction with their pre and post-operative consultations and information concerning their proposed surgery and its outcome. Conclusion: The results of this audit suggest that the satisfaction of patients following foot surgery can rise significantly following the appointment of a podiatric surgeon to a general hospital orthopaedic department

This work aims to quantitatively assess the current opinions of foot and ankle surgery provision by podiatric surgeons within the UK. Three groups were targeted by postal questionnaire; Orthopaedic surgeons with membership to BOFAS, Orthopaedic surgeons not affiliated to the specialist foot and ankle society and surgical Podiatrists. In addition we aim to identify areas of conflict and suggestions for future integration. A postal questionnaire was sent to all Fellows of the Faculty of Podiatric Surgery, College of Podiatrists (136), members of the British Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, (156), and a randomly selected number of Fellows of the British Orthopaedic Association, who are not members of BOFAS (250). We have received replies from 99 (73%) of the Podiatric Surgical group, 77 (49%) of the Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle surgeons and 66 (26%) from non-Foot and Ankle Orthopaedic Surgeons. Respondents were asked to detail their present practice and issues that they considered to restrict closer working between Orthopaedic Surgeons and Podiatric surgeons. Additionally, each surgeon was given a range of surgical procedures and asked to identify the most appropriate surgical profession to undertake the procedure. The good response rate amongst Foot and Ankle Practitioners (both Podiatric and Orthopaedic) reflects the interest in these issues compared to Orthopaedic Surgeons from other sub-specialties. Poor understanding of Podiatric surgical training, impact on private practice and medical protectionism were areas identified by podiatric respondents. Conflicts over job-title, concerns over training, role boundaries and responsibilities were identified by Orthopaedic respondents as being significant restrictors to further integration. The paper will present the full results of the survey and discuss the suitability and feasibility of closer working practices between Orthopaedic and Podiatric surgeons

Introduction: In 2005, 88 patients (19M/69 F, mean age 55) initially referred by their GP to a Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon were seen by an Operative Podiatrist as a waiting list initiative. The mean delay between GP referral and clinic appointment was 632 days. The majority of patients were listed for a surgical procedure. The podiatrist left the Trust before any listed surgery was performed. The cohort was subsequently reviewed by a Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon prior to surgical intervention, creating a unique opportunity to compare podiatric and orthopaedic input in one patient group. Materials & Methods: Casenotes and clinic correspondence were identified by merging clinic datasets & retrieved in 86/88 cases. Medical records and documentation of peripheral vascular status were examined as a standard of care. Correlation of surgical decision making was examined qualitatively. Results: Circulatory status was found to be documented in 0/58 (0%) records available for patients seen by the podiatrist and 70/74 (95%) seen by the orthopaedic surgeon respectively. Vascular investigation or referral was initiated by the orthopaedic surgeon in 8 patients listed for surgery by the podiatrist. The listed procedure was postponed or cancelled by the orthopaedic surgeon in a further 11 patients (5 medically unfit for listed surgery, 4 treated conservatively & 2 unable to obtain valid consent). No written or dictated contemporaneous records were made for 23/88 (26%) of index podiatric consultations. Clinically significant drug history was documented by the podiatrist in 1/13 (8%) cases recorded by the orthopaedic surgeon. Discussion: Reasonable correlation was observed between proposed surgical interventions for forefoot problems. Poor correlation was observed for mid- and/or hind foot problems. Avoidable adverse outcomes might have been anticipated in 19/88 (22%) patients listed for surgery by the Operative Podiatrist. Conclusion: The employment of unsupervised non-medical surgical practitioners in hospital based orthopaedic practice is not appropriate

Introduction: Mönckeberg sclerosis or medial artery calcification (MAC) is a well known phenomenon associated with the diabetic and other altered blood parameters. However its consequence within the foot and specifically the 1st dorsal metatarsal artery has not previously been studied. Materials and Methods: Nearly 1000 foot x-rays were studied over a nine month period in a busy District General Hospital to identify the prevalence of first dorsal metatarsal artery calcification. The electronic medical notes for all the patients were reviewed to confirm which patients were known to be diabetic. The patients with positive findings were then identified and their HbA1c, creatinine, and previous foot interventions recorded. Results: 1.4% of the population studied had medial artery calcification of the 1st dorsal metatarsal artery. 93% were known diabetics and 100% had impaired glucose tolerance (a glucose plasma concentration of > 7.8mmol/l two hours post glucose loading). 79% have required previous podiatric care for foot ulceration and 64% had required surgical intervention for their diabetic feet. MAC has a high positive predictive value (92.9% (95% CI 69.2–98.7)) for diabetes, with a good specificity (99.9% (95%CI 99.4–100)) and low false positive rate (0.1% (05%CI 0.0–0.6)). Discussion: Medial artery calcification in the first dorsal metatarsal artery is characteristic of impaired glucose metabolism, and if seen on routine x-ray should be an indication for screening of the patient. It should also be considered as a foot at risk sign in the established diabetic due to the high incidence of foot ulceration and need for surgical intervention in this group. Conclusion: The prevalence of MAC seen on routine foot x-rays has been demonstrated in a large cohort of patients. The specificity and positive predictive value for diabetes has been calculated and the prevalence of these patients requiring surgical or specialist podiatric care recorded

This study looked at the effect on referral for surgical opinion of introducing ESP Physiotherapy (1 physiotherapist) and Podiatry (2 podiatrists) clinics on the number of foot and ankle patients who were seem for a surgical opinion and subsequently surgery. Prior to the introduction of the ESP clinics the number of patients was approximately 1 in every 8 was listed for surgery. At the time of the study the ESP clinics accounted for half of the new patients seen in orthopaedic foot & ankle clinics. The other half was seen by the surgical team (3 surgeons). Results. In a 2-month period 131 patients were seen in the ESP clinics of these 41 were referred for a surgical opinion (31%)

In podiatric medicine, diagnosis of foot disorders is often merely based on tests of foot function in static conditions or on visual assessment of the patient's gait. There is a lack of tools for the analysis of foot type and for diagnosis of foot ailments. In fact, static footprints obtained via carbon paper imprint material have traditionally been used to determine the foot type or highlight foot regions presenting excessive plantar pressure, and the data currently available to podiatrists and orthotists on foot function during dynamic activities, such as walking or running, are scarce. The device presented in this paper aims to improve current foot diagnosis by providing an objective evaluation of foot function based on pedobarographic parameters recorded during walking. 23 healthy subjects (16 female, 7 males; age 35 ± 15 years; weight 65.3 ± 12.7; height 165 ± 7 cm) with different foot types volunteered in the study. Subjects' feet were visually inspected with a podoscope to assess the foot type. A tool, comprised of a 2304-sensor pressure plate (P-walk, BTS, Italy) and an ad-hoc software written in Matlab (The Mathworks, US), was used to estimate plantar foot morphology and functional parameters from plantar pressure data. Foot dimensions and arch-index, i.e. the ratio between midfoot and whole footprint area, were assessed against measurements obtained with a custom measurement rig and a laser-based foot scanner (iQube, Delcam, UK). The subjects were asked to walk along a 6m walkway instrumented with the pressure plate. In order to assess the tool capability to discriminate between the most typical walking patterns, each subject was asked to walk with the foot in forcibly pronated and supinated postures. Additionally, the pressure plate orientation was set to +15°, +30°, −15° and −30° with respect to the walkway main direction to assess the accuracy in measuring the foot progression angle (i.e. the angle between the foot axis and the direction of walk). At least 5 walking trials were recorded for each foot in each plate configuration and foot posture. The device allowed to estimate foot length with a maximum error of 5% and foot breadth with an error of 1%. As expected, the arch-index estimated by the device was the lowest in the cavus-feet group (0.12 ± 0.04) and the highest in the flat-feet group (0.29 ± 0.03). These values were between 4 – 10 % lower than the same measurements obtained with the foot scanner. The centre of pressure excursion index [1] was the lowest in the forcibly-pronated foot and the largest in the supinated foot. While the pressure plate used here has some limitations in terms of spatial resolution and sensor technology [2], the tool appears capable to provide information on foot morphology and foot function with satisfying accuracy. Patient's instrumental examination takes only few minutes and the data can be used by podiatrists to improve the diagnosis of foot ailments, and by orthotists to design or recommend the best orthotics to treat the foot condition

The incidence of wound complications after a hip or a knee replacement is well established, but there is no such data about foot/ankle surgery. Without this data it is difficult to compare performance between different care-providers. It is also difficult to benchmark services that could potentially be provided by a wide range of care providers (chiropodists, podiatrists, podiatric surgeons, general orthopaedic surgeons with a small foot/ankle practice, etc). Our aim was to establish the incidence of wound complications after foot/ankle surgery and provide a baseline for future comparison. Our study was done in two parts. First part was to conduct an opinion-survey of BOFAS members with a substantial foot/ankle practice, on wound complications from foot/ankle surgery in their own practice. Second part was to conduct a prospective study on the incidence of wound complications from our own foot/ankle practice. The study was registered as an audit and did not require ethical approval. All wound complications (skin necrosis, wound dehiscence, superficial and deep infections) were recorded prospectively. Record of such data was obtained by an independent observer, and from multiple sources, to avoid under-reporting. 60 % of the responders to our survey had a predominant foot/ankle practice (exclusive or at least 75 % of their practice was foot/ankle surgery) and were included for further analysis of their responses. A large majority of these responders (64%) reported a rate of 2–5 % for superficial infection, and a significant majority (86 %) reported a deep infection rate of less than 2 %. Results from our own practice showed an incidence of superficial infection of 2.8 % and deep infection of 1.5 %. With increasing focus on clinical outcome measures as an indicator of quality, it is imperative to publish data on wound complications/ infection after foot/ankle surgery, and in the absence of such data, our two-armed study (survey-opinion and prospective audit) provides a useful benchmark for future comparisons

Heel pain is very prevalent. Pain, especially after a period of rest, is the main symptom. Reduced ability to walk long distances and inability to participate in exercise and sport are other complaints. Plantar heel pain is most commonly caused by plantar fasciitis. Whilst only the recalcitrant cases reach secondary care, this can still be a significant workload. In the Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, we see approximately 200 cases of recalcitrant heel pain each year. The vast majority of cases never come to hospital and are managed in primary care (1500/yr in podiatry alone). Effective primary treatments should reduce the number of long-term sufferers. Recalcitrant cases of plantar fasciitis often have atypical symptoms. Radiological imaging is extremely useful in clarifying the diagnosis. Ultrasound is our preferred modality. There is a spectrum of pathology that affects the plantar fascia, and this is less well classified than for the achilles tendon, where the distinction between insertional tendinopathy and tendinopathy of the main body of the tendon is helpful in guiding treatment. The evidence for many forms of treatment for plantar fasciitis is weak. Currently, the use of formal calf stretching programs is widely considered to be the best first-line treatment. There are additional benefits with stretches to the fascia itself. The mechanism by which these stretches help is not well established. Calf contracture is, however, associated with a variety of clinical problems in the foot and ankle. This is especially true for isolated gastrocnemius contracture. There is also laboratory evidence that increased plantar fascia strain is seen with increased calf muscle tension. Surgery to release a gastrocnemius contracture improves biomechanics and has been used in refractory cases of heel pain with good effect. Radial extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is the latest version of this non-invasive treatment. Results in our centre are encouraging. For selected cases of atypical plantar fasciopathy injection treatments are effective

Aims

The first metatarsal pronation deformity of hallux valgus feet is widely recognized. However, its assessment relies mostly on 3D standing CT scans. Two radiological signs, the first metatarsal round head (RH) and inferior tuberosity position (ITP), have been described, but are seldom used to aid in diagnosis. This study was undertaken to determine the reliability and validity of these two signs for a more convenient and affordable preoperative assessment and postoperative comparison.

Introduction: Force plate analysis of contact areas and pressure has been used in the fields of podiatry and foot surgery. We used this tool in assessing normal subjects and knee replacement patients kneeling. Aim: We analysed contact areas and pressures over the front of the knee during different kneeling positions. Methods: Twenty three normal subjects and 33 knee replacement patients were included in this study. The patients were selected according to age and kneeling ability and the absence of involvement of other joints. They had unilateral or bilateral Total (TKR) or Unicompartmental knee replacements (UKR). Target points were identified on the plate and patients were asked to place their tibial tuberosity on the target sites. Patients and normal subjects’ data of load, contact area and pressure were recorded with knee at 90 degrees. A second reading was taken with subjects kneeling in their maximum flexion comfortable position. Foot position during kneeling was recorded in each case. Results: Average age was 48.3 years for the normal group and 65.5.2 for the replaced knee group. Average range of motion was 141 degrees for the normal group and 115 degrees for the replaced knees group. In the normal group, there was a significant positive correlation between body mass and kneeling load at both 90 degrees and maximum flexion. Kneeling pressure was never identical in both knees in all groups. There was no significant difference of peak pressures and contact areas between the normal and UKR group. The angle of flexion affected the contact pressures as going from 90 degrees to higher flexion with the body weight still actively supported increases contact pressure, which then dropped to lowest level in maximum flexion when the body weight was supported by the calf. Peak loads were usually in the region of the tibial tuberosity. Conclusion: Kneeling may be a sided activity with each individual having a dominant knee. The UKR group showed more normal kinematics in comparison with the TKR group. Maximum contact pressures decreased in knees able to achieve full flexion. As kneeling flexion angle increases, the contact area decreases and while the thigh is off the calf and the peak pressure increases. Contact pressure dropped to below 90 degrees level whenever full flexion was achieved

Aims

The purpose of our study was to determine which groups of orthopaedic providers favour virtual care, and analyze overall orthopaedic provider perceptions of virtual care. We hypothesize that providers with less clinical experience will favour virtual care, and that orthopaedic providers overall will show increased preference for virtual care during the COVID-19 pandemic and decreased preference during non-pandemic circumstances.

Aims

The purpose of this study is to examine the adductus impact on the second metatarsal by the nonosteotomy nonarthrodesis syndesmosis procedure for the hallux valgus deformity correction, and how it would affect the mechanical function of the forefoot in walking. For correcting the metatarsus primus varus deformity of hallux valgus feet, the syndesmosis procedure binds first metatarsal to the second metatarsal with intermetatarsal cerclage sutures.

The February 2015 Foot & Ankle Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Syndesmosis screw removal in randomised controlled trial; Diagnostic value of Hawkins sign; Chevron rules supreme?; Diabetes and ankle replacement; Fixed-bearing ankle replacement; Fusion for osteomyelitis of the ankle; ‘Reformed’ fallers.