This work aims to quantitatively assess the current opinions of foot and ankle surgery provision by podiatric surgeons within the UK. Three groups were targeted by postal questionnaire; Orthopaedic surgeons with membership to BOFAS, Orthopaedic surgeons not affiliated to the specialist foot and ankle society and surgical Podiatrists. In addition we aim to identify areas of conflict and suggestions for future integration. A postal questionnaire was sent to all Fellows of the Faculty of Podiatric Surgery, College of Podiatrists (136), members of the British Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, (156), and a randomly selected number of Fellows of the British Orthopaedic Association, who are not members of BOFAS (250). We have received replies from 99 (73%) of the Podiatric Surgical group, 77 (49%) of the Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle surgeons and 66 (26%) from non-Foot and Ankle Orthopaedic Surgeons. Respondents were asked to detail their present practice and issues that they considered to restrict closer working between Orthopaedic Surgeons and Podiatric surgeons. Additionally, each surgeon was given a range of surgical procedures and asked to identify the most appropriate surgical profession to undertake the procedure. The good response rate amongst Foot and Ankle Practitioners (both Podiatric and Orthopaedic) reflects the interest in these issues compared to Orthopaedic Surgeons from other sub-specialties. Poor understanding of Podiatric surgical training, impact on private practice and medical protectionism were areas identified by podiatric respondents. Conflicts over job-title, concerns over training, role boundaries and responsibilities were identified by Orthopaedic respondents as being significant restrictors to further integration. The paper will present the full results of the survey and discuss the suitability and feasibility of closer working practices between Orthopaedic and Podiatric surgeons

Podiatrists have an important role in providing care in a Foot and Ankle clinic. Most Foot and Ankle Surgeons welcome the assistance they can provide – in a supervised role. Most Trusts should have one Foot and Ankle Surgeon but there are a limited number of trained specialists. Some Trusts have been appointing ‘Consultant Podiatric Surgeons’ – perhaps as a way of addressing this shortfall. There are potentially a number of concerns amongst Foot and Ankle Surgeons: the public perception of title ‘consultant’; a Non supervised role; Potential to be used as a more cost effective option. We therefore undertook a Questionnaire assessment of patients attending a Foot and Ankle Clinic. Over a six week period 148 patients attended the specialist clinic. Of those 76% responded. 64% were females. The average age range was 45-64. Most patients assumed the Consultant in charge of their care was a qualified medical practitioner (93%) and regulated by the GMC (92%) and who had completed a recognised higher surgical training scheme (93%). Irrespective of suitable experience 2 out of 3 patients stated they would object if the Consultant in charge of their care did not meet the above criteria. If the patient required surgery 80% stated they would object if the supervising Consultant was not a medically qualified doctor (this was more important in female patients) Interestingly 78% stated they would refuse surgery unless they were under the care of a medically qualified doctor. Very few patients understood the title Consultant Podiatric Surgeon (with those responding assuming they were medical doctors). This potentially has significant implications in those Trusts employing Consultant Podiatric Surgeons as opposed to Foot and Ankle (Orthopaedic) Surgeons. Unless this differential is clearly explained to the patients there is an issue with informed consent and the potential for litigation

Aims

Diabetic foot care is a significant burden on the NHS in England. We have conducted a nationwide survey to determine the current participation of orthopaedic surgeons in diabetic foot care in England.