Introduction. Pedicle subtraction osteotomy is a powerful technique for correcting sagittal imbalance in ankylosing spondylitis. There has been significant perioperative morbidity associated with this technique in the peer review literature. We present the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital experience with a single surgeon retrospective study that was conducted to evaluate the outcomes in patients who underwent lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the correction of thoracolumbar kyphotic deformity in ankylosing spondylitis. Method. Twenty seven patients underwent a lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy and adjacent level posterior instrumentation between 1995 and 2010. There were 18 males and 9 females in the study. Events during the peri-operative course and post-operative complications were recorded. The radiological outcome and patient satisfaction were analysed with mean follow-up of one and a half years. Results. The mean operative time was three and half hours and the mean blood loss was 2290mls. Final follow-up radiograph showed an increase in lumbar lordosis angle from 17 degrees to 45 degrees. The sagittal imbalance improved by 85mm with the operation. Complications included loosening in two patients, one transient neurologic deficit and one infective non-union occurred overall. There were no mortalities from the surgery. Two patients developed junctional kyphosis and required a repeat operation. There was an improvement in the Oswestry Disability Score from a mean of 29 to 16 after the surgey. All (100%) of the patients were satisfied with the results of the procedure and would recommend the surgey to others. Conclusion. The study shows that pedicle subtraction extension osteotomy is effective for the correction of kyphotic deformity in ankylosing spondylitis

Object. Our purpose is to evaluate early benefits and complications of pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) for patients with fixed thoracolumbar kyphotic deformities. Background. The fixed sagittal imbalance is a syndrome in which the patient is only able to stand with the weight-bearing line in front of the sacrum [. 1. ]. Its etiology could be very different, but usually it is due to idiopathic scoliosis or degenerative sagittal imbalance [. 2. ]. Different techniques are reported in the literature for its correction [. 3. ]. In particular, in the last few years, the PSO is affirming as a good technique in correcting the fixed thoracolumbar sagittal deformity, with its three column osteotomy [. 1. –. 3. ]. Materials and Methods. From December 2005 to July 2006 the first 10 PSOs for patients with fixed symptomatic thoracolumbar sagittal deformity were performed in our Spine Center. All 10 were female (100%). Mean age was 63.8±5.3 (55–71). The diagnosis was idiopathic scoliosis in 7 cases (70%), degenerative sagittal imbalance in 3 (30%). Patients had undergone a mean of 1.5±0.97 (0–3) operative procedures prior to the PSO. Results. A pedicle subtraction was always performed between the level L1 and L4. An average of 10±2.9 (7–16) vertebral levels were included in the spinal fusion. Intraoperative estimated blood loss was 1300±305 (800–1800) mL, operative time was 298.5±37.5 (250–360) minutes. An average increase in lumbar lordosis of 28.3±12.1 (8–51) degree was established with this technique: the transpedicular wedge resection contributed 73.5%±25.4% (19.4±6.1 degree) of this correction; the remaining correction came from multilevel facetectomy. The average improvement in the sagittal plumb line was 4.3±5.1 (from −5 to +15) cm. There were 8 (80%) perioperative complications: 4 major (1 subdural hematoma; 1 pulmonary embolism; 1 fracture of the upper end vertebrae; 1 pemanent neurologic deficit); 4 minor (1 transient neurologic deficit; 3 wound dehiscences). Most patients reported improvement in terms of pain and self image as well as overall satisfaction with the procedure. Conclusions. Pedicle subtraction osteotomy is a useful procedure in correcting fixed sagittal thoracolumbar imbalance. Often it is well-tolerated, but certainly this is a technically demanding procedure with high perioperative complication rates

Introduction. Pedicle Subtraction osteotomy (PRO) in correction of severe spinal deformities is well established. Prospective analysis of its efficacy in complex spinal deformities is sparse in literature. Aims and objectives. To assess the role of PRO in correction of uniplanar and multiplanar spinal deformity and to assess the role of revision PRO in failed corrections. Material and methods. 50 patients were operated between 1996-2007 and followed up for 2 years (2-6). 27 had uniplanar kyphosis (60-128 degrees) and kyphoscoliosis was seen in 10. Failed corrections were seen in 11 uniplanar and 2 multiplanar deformities. The average pre-operative kyphosis and sagittal balance was 78.7 degrees and 22 mm (7-30) respectively. Scoliotic deformity ranged from 97-138 (average 108 degrees) and the coronal imbalance from 10-55 (average 24mm). Deformity distribution was upper dorsal 5, mid dorsal 22, dorso-lumbar 18 and lumbar 5. A single posterior approach sufficed in 47 cases while 3 required an anterior approach for reconstruction. 13 patients had pre-operative neurological deficit (bedridden 10, ambulatory 3). The average surgical time required was 300 minutes and blood loss was 800cc. The anterior defect reconstructed averaged 16.5mm (5-28). Results. Pulmonary complications occurred in 8 (21%), (embolism 1, pneumonia 2, hypoxia 5). Wound infection required debridement in 3 (8%). Failed corrections were seen in 10 (3 out of 37 in our series, 8%) due to failure of construct 2, severe disease 2, infection (active 2, quiescent 4). Neurological deterioration occurred in 1(2%), medial pedicle wall perforation. 12 patients regained ambulation (independent 7, support 5). Post-operative kyphosis and sagittal balance was 36.5 (10-108) and 10mm (5-20) respectively. Average correction was: sagittal 46.4%, coronal 37.5% and revisions 58%. The correction of kyphosis and sagittal balance was statistically comparable between primary and revision cases (p >0.05). Conclusions. PRO offers an excellent single stage decompression and controlled correction of kyphosis

Purpose. compare the radiological results in sagittal balance correction obtained with pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) versus anterior-posterior osteotomy (APO) by double approach in adults. Material and Methods. between January of 2001 and July of 2009, fifty-eight vertebral osteotomies were carried out in fifty-six patients: 9 Smith-Petersen osteotomy (SPO), one vertebral resection osteotomy (VRO), 30 anterior-posterior osteotomies (APO) and 18 pedicle subtraction osteotomies (PSO), being the lasts two groups the sample studied (48 osteotomies). The mean age of the patients was 56.3 years (17–72). Initial diagnose was: 28 posttraumathic kyphosis, 7 postsurgical kyphosis, 7 adult degenerative disease, 4 ankylosing spondylitis and 2 congenital kyphoscoliosis. We evaluated the preoperative standing radiographs, the postoperative and at final follow-up by digital measurements with iPACS system viewer (© Real Time Image, USA, 2001). The mean follow-up was 54 months (6–98), and complications were analized. Results. The group APO had a mean preoperative thoracic kyphosis of 67 °, a mean lumbar lordosis of −42° and a mean sagital balance of 8.6°. The group PSO had a mean preoperative thoracic kyphosis of 41°, a mean lumbar lordosis of −22° and a mean sagital balance of 12.3°. The mean correction in the APO group was 29° in its thoracic kyphosis, 8° of lumbar lordosis and 6.5° in its sagital balance. The mean correction in the PSO group was 12° of the thoracic kyphosis, 25 in the lumbar lordosis and 8.4 cm in the sagital balance. The local correction obtained at the osteotomy level was 28° in the APO group and 25.3° in the PSO group. There were no statistically significant differences in the percentage of correction between both groups (p>0.05). In terms of complications, PSO group had lower complication rate (26.6%) comparing to ODV group (44.5%). Conclusions. APO and PSO are useful techniques to correct the global sagital balance in patients with a disturbance of the sagittal profile. The correction obtained with the PSO is similar to obtained with the APO. Patients undergoing an OSP had a lower complication rate than patients undergoing APO

Purpose: To determine the results and safety of patients undergoing|spinal cord level (SCL) pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) for thetreatment of thoracic kyphosis. Methods: Retrospective chart and radiographic review of 25 patients with severe thoracic kyphosis. Results: The underlying diagnoses were: tumour (8), Scheuermann’s Kyphosis (4), degenerative/osteoporosis (3), fracture (3), inflammatory|(2), neurofibromatosis (2), congenital kyphosis (1), tuberculosis (1), and infected tumour (1). The osteotomy was combined with a lumbar PSO in|five patients. Three patients were treated with double thoracic|osteotomies. Two PSOs were extended transdiscally to debride the|infected disc. The mean focal PSO correction was 33.6° (range 9°–73°). The overall thoracic kyphosis measured from T5 to T12 improved from a|mean of 58.3° preoperatively to 37.1° postoperatively. Estimated blood|loss ranged from 400cc to 12500cc. All patients presenting with spinal|cord dysfunction neurologically improved postoperatively. There were 2 major neurological complications. One patient developed postoperative | progressive paraplegia following a prolonged period of intra- and | postoperative severe hypotension and coagulopathy. The other developed a| pseudoarthrosis five months postoperatively and suffered an incomplete|spinal cord injury during the subsequent revision. Other complications included: T3 radicular pain (1) -resolved; dural tears (2); respiratory failure -prolonged ICU admission(1); fractures proximal to the thoracic (2) and distal to lumbar (1) instrumentation; incomplete corrections of the sagittal alignment despite double osteotomies (2); wound breakdown associated with preoperative radiation (1).|. Conclusions: SCL-PSO is a feasible option for severe thoracic kyphosis. This procedure eliminates the need for anterior surgery; however, it does not reduce the potential for significant morbidity

In posterior fixation for deformity correction and spinal fusion, there is increasing discussion around auxiliary rods secured to the pedicle screws, sharing the loads, and reducing stresses in the primary rods. Dual-rod, multiaxial screws (DRMAS) provide two rod mounting points on a single screw shaft to allow unique constructs and load-sharing at specific vertebrae. These implants provide surgical flexibility to add auxiliary rods across a pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) or over multiple vertebral levels where higher bending loads are anticipated in primary rods. Other options include fixed-angle devices as multiple rod connectors (MRC) and variable-angle dominoes (VAD) with a single-axis rotation in the connection. The objective in this simulation study was to assess rod bending in adult spinal instrumentation across an osteotomy using constructs with DRMAS, MRC, or VAD multi-rod connections. The study was performed using computer biomechanical models of two adult patients having undergone posterior instrumented spinal fusion for deformity. The models were patient-specific, incorporating the biomechanics of the spine, have been calibrated to assess deformity correction and intra- and postoperative loads across the instrumented spine. One traditional bilateral-rod construct was used as a control for six multi-rod configurations. Spinal fixation scenarios from T10 through S1 with the PSO at L4 were simulated on each patient-specific model. The multi-rod configurations were bilateral and unilateral DRMAS at L2 through S1 (B-DRMAS and U-DRMAS), bilateral DRMAS at L3 and L5 (Hybrid), bilateral MRC over L3-L5, bilateral and unilateral VAD over L3-L5 (B-VAD and U-VAD). Postoperative gravity plus 8-Nm flexion and extension loads were simulated and bending moments in the rods were computed and compared. In the simulated control for each case (#1 & #2), average rod bending moments (of the right and left rods) at the PSO level were 6.7Nm & 5.5Nm, respectively, in upright position, 8.8Nm & 7.3Nm in 8-Nm flexion, and 4.6Nm & 3.7Nm in 8-Nm extension. When the primary rods of the multi-rod constructs were normalized to this control, the bending moments in the primary rods of Case #1 & #2 were respectively 57% & 58% (B-DRMAS), 54% & 62% (B-VAD), 60% & 61% (MRC), 72% & 69% (Hybrid), 81% & 70% (U-DRMAS), and 81% & 73% (U-VAD). Overall, the reduction in primary rod bending moments ranged from 19–46% for standing loads. Under simulated 8-Nm functional moments, the primary rod moments were reduced by 18–46% in flexion and 17–48% in extension. More rods and stiffer connections produced the largest reductions for the primary rods, but auxiliary rods had bending moments that varied from 49% lower to 13% higher than the primary ones. Additional rods through DRMAS, MRC, and VAD connections noticeably reduced the bending loads in the primary rods compared with a standard bilateral-rod construct. Yet, bending loads in the auxiliary rods were higher or lower than those in the primary rods depending on the 3D spinal deformity and stiffness of the auxiliary rod connections. Additional studies and patient-specific analyses are needed to optimize instrumentation parameters that may improve load-sharing in these constructs

Background and Purpose: Tuberculosis is a common cause of mortality and morbidity in our country. Late neurological deficits following conservative management can occur though not very common. Deformity correction and decompression at a single sitting in a healed tuberculous spine is a massive undertaking and it requires experience and appropriate technique to achieve a good correction. Materials and Methods: We operated upon 22 patients with a deformed spine and a progressive neurological deficit following healed tuberculosis. All patients complained of pain and found the cosmetic appearance unacceptable. The average age was 29 years {19 – 35 years}. All patients had completed a course of four drugs anti tuberculous chemotherapy for a minimum period of 12 months. All patients were screened for disease activity before surgery. The average Konstam angle before surgery was 86 degrees {80–105 degrees}. All patients underwent single stage surgical correction by a posterior based pedicle subtraction osteotomy with excision of the internal gibbus and further decompression and posterior stabilization using a screw rod construct. The local bone chips removed during the surgical procedure was used to promote fusion. Results: We achieved an average kyphosis correction of 60 degrees {52–75 degrees}. At an average follow up of 18 months the average loss of correction was 3 degrees. The mean operating time was 165 minutes {120 – 210 minutes}. The mean blood loss was 800 ml {700–1100 ml}. All patients had significant improvement in their post operative pain scores and disability outcome measures. All patients were greatly satisfied with the cosmetic result obtained. There were no major intra operative or post operative complications. Conclusion: Transpedicular three-column osteotomy uses a posterior approach and generally leaves no gap anteriorly. The anterior column is not opened as in a Smith-Petersen osteotomy. Posterior approach offers access to all three columns of the spine and avoids the morbidity associated with the anterior approach. The internal gibbus can be addressed and the normal posterior bony elements in tuberculosis can be used for achieving fusion

To evaluate the incidence of complications and the radiographic and clinical outcomes from 2-stage reconstruction including 3-column osteotomy for revision adult spinal deformity.

A prospective cohort study performed over 2 years at a major tertiary referral centre for adult spinal deformity surgery. All consecutive patients requiring 2-stage corrective surgery for revision adult spinal deformity were included. Radiographic parameters and clinical outcome measures were collected preoperatively and at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years postoperatively. Radiographic parameters analysed included pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, lumbar lordosis, thoracic kyphosis and sagittal vertical axis. Clinical outcome measures collected included EQ-5D, ODI, SRS 22 and VAS Pain Scores.

Performing anterior column reconstruction followed by 3-column osteotomy and extension of instrumentation for revision spinal deformity resulted an excellent correction of sagittal alignment, minimal surgical complications and significant improvements in HRQOL. Restoration of lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt and sagittal vertical axis were observed in addition to postoperative improvements in EQ-5D, ODI, SRS 22 and VAS Pain Scores at follow-up.

Performing anterior column reconstruction prior to a 3-column osteotomy minimises complications associated with 3-column osteotomy and extension of posterior instrumentation. We propose a treatment algorithm for safe and effective treatment in revision adult deformity surgery.

Background. New marker free motion analysis systems are being used extensively in the area of sports medicine and physiotherapy. The accuracy and validity of use in an orthopaedic setting have not been fully assessed for these newer marker free motion analysis systems. The aim of this study is to compare leg length and varus/valgus knee measurements performed by leg measurement x-ray, and performed using the new marker free motion analysis system (Organic motion biostage). Methods. Patients attending the orthopaedic department for total knee replacements were recruited. They underwent radiological leg measurement x-ray, clinical leg measurement, and finally assessment using the organic motion biostage system. These were analysed using the motion monitor software, microsoft excel and minitab 16. Results. For 23 patients assessed, all methods showed a statistically significant result (p<0.05) using paired t-tests. This rejects the null hypothesis- indicating that organic motion does not have the accuracy currently to measure leg length or knee varus/valgus angle. Conclusions. Results indicate that the organic motion biostage system- a new marker free motion analysis system, is not feasible currently as a method of accurately measuring leg-length. Given the current modelling methods used by this new system there are limitations, that if addressed may yet allow the system to become a useful clinical tool. These authors feel it still has applications in orthopaedics as a useful, quick, and easy to use method of motion analysis and functional screen in orthopaedic patients, and warrants further investigation. We also present a case of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy, and show how markerless motion analysis is a useful tool for assessing spinal sagittal balance, and its effect on the biomechanics of walking. Level of Evidence. IV

Introduction/Aim. In rigid Sagittal and Coronal deformities of the spine Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomies (PSO) is preferred to achieve maximal correction. We describe successful Asymmetrical Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomies (APSO) performed on patients with symptomatic coronal imbalance. Methods/Results. Case 1: 28yr old female with VATER syndrome with 25° coronal imbalance to her left with past h/o fusion from L3 – S1 for L5 hemi-vertebra. After APSO at L3 coronal imbalance was reduced to 0°. Case 2: 49yr old male with post-traumatic coronal deformity of 35° at T6 and paraplegia affecting his sitting balance and respiratory function. Following APSO at T12 imbalance was reduced to 5°. Osteotomy Technique. After insertion of pedicle screws for the stabilisation, laminectomy of the proposed level of osteotomy was performed. Next, dissection lateral to the pedicle and vertebral body was performed bluntly with mastoids to reach the front of the anterior cortex and confirmed with fluoroscopy. Using osteotomes, curettes and Kerrison oblique osteotomy from the lateral cortex to reach opposite cortex was performed above & below the pedicle under imaging. The facets were resected at this level to facilitate mobility of the osteotomy site. The osteotomy site was closed after insertion of extra hard rods. Conclusion. Satisfactory correction of coronal deformity can be achieved with asymmetrical pedicle subtraction osteotomy to improve cosmesis and also the sitting and standing balance. In contrast to Sagittal Osteotomies, blunt dissection to the anterior cortex is necessary in coronal Osteotomies to allow resection of anterior cortical bone for closure of the wedge

Purpose. To review the outcome of multilevel (≥4) instrumented lumbar fusion to sacrum / pelvis performed for degenerative conditions. Methods. Clinical data of 47 consecutive patients from 2002 to 2012 were reviewed retrospectively. Inclusion criteria included fusion from at least L2 to S1 / pelvis, i.e. minimum of 4 levels. Imaging was assessed for restoration of normal sagittal profile as well as subsequent fusion. EQ5D, OSD and VAS scores pre-op and at 6 months post op were analysed. Average age at surgery was 64 years (50–78). Thirteen cases were primary and 34 revisions. Indications were axial back pain either associated with sagittal imbalance (40%) or leg pain (36%) and leg pain alone in 10%. Results. The intra-operative blood loss averaged 2222 (250–7000) ml with 40% re-infusion from cell-saver. The average surgical duration was 268 minutes. Proximal extent of instrumentation was T2 (1), T3 (1), T4 (2), T8 (1), T9 (1), T10 (17), T11 (2), T12 (5), L1 (4) and L2 (13). TLIF's were done in 20 cases mostly at the base of the construct. Pedicle subtraction osteotomies were performed in 14 revision cases. Dural tears occurred in 14 cases, all revision cases except one. Wound infection occurred in 3 cases. Except for transient quadriceps weakness related to osteotomy, no neurological complications occurred. One patient deceased peri-operatively. Subsequent revision was required in 13 cases for instrumentation failure. OSD score improved by 15.3 points on average, which is clinically and statistically significant. Conclusion. Long lumbar fusions remain technically demanding with a high incidence of adverse events. This is due to the nature of revision surgery and high biomechanical demands on constructs. Surgical intervention can however be justified by the desperation of the cohort in terms of pain and poor function which can be modestly improved with this intervention. NO DISCLOSURES

Introduction: Correction of lumbar spine deformity in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) can be achieved by pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO), polysegmental osteotomy (PO) or Smith-Petersen osteotomy (SPO). We report our results with these three techniques. Methods: 26 males and 5 females with AS and average age of 54.7 years (range 40–74 years) underwent surgery for loss of sagittal balance, horizontal gaze and back pain. 12 patients underwent PSO, 10 SPO, and 9 PO. Osteotomy was carried out at L3 in PSO and SPO with pedicle fixation from T11 to S1. 9 patients with PO had osteotomy from L2–5 and fixation from T10-S1. Sagittal translation during corrective manoeuvre was controlled in 21 patients by application of temporary malleable rods, which were substituted with permanent rods. TLSO was used post-operatively for average period of three months. Mean follow-up was 4.2 years (range 1–9 years). Radiographic and clinical outcomes (ODI, VAS, SRS-22) were analysed. Results: Mean kyphotic correction in PSO was 380 (range 250–490), in PO was 300 (range 280–400) and in SPO was 280 (range 240–380). The sacrohorizontal angle improved by 190(range 50–300) in PSO, 210 (range 80–280) in PO and 150 (range 50–180) in SPO. Outcome scores were better in PSO and PO as compared to SPO. Blood loss and transient nerve root palsy was slightly higher in PSO group. One patient with SPO had fatal bleeding as a result of aortic injury. Conclusions: Regular use of temporary malleable rods is recommended to prevent sagittal translation during correction reducing the risk of neurological injury. Better correction of deformity was achieved with PSO and PO at the expense of increased blood loss. SPO can increase the risk of vascular injury, therefore we recommend PSO and PO for correction of deformity in Ankylosing Spondylitis

Study Design: Retrospective study. Objective: To describe a modified cervico-thoracic extension osteotomy and evaluate clinical & radiographic outcomes. Subjects: 10 patients with fixed cervico-thoracic kyphosis, average age 56 years, minimum 12 months follow-up. Three patients had psoriatic spondyloarthropathy, Three patients had previous lumbar osteotomies. Technique: General anaesthesia and SSEP spinal cord monitoring was used. Complete laminectomy of C7, hemilaminectomy of C6 and T1, plus pedicle subtraction osteotomy and decancellisation of C7 was performed. Upon completion of the osteotomy, controlled halo manipulation allowed closure of the osteotomy: the pivot point being the anterior longitudinal ligament. Segmental fixation with lateral mass and pedicle screws plus bone graft was then added. All patients were immobilised for three months in halo-jacket. Results: Restoration of normal forward gaze was achieved in all patients. Mean preoperative kyphosis of 17 degrees was corrected to lordosis of 36 degrees (mean total correction 53 degrees). No spinal cord injuries or permanent nerve root palsies occurred. Three patients had mild sensory radiculopathies lasting a few weeks. No loss of correction, no pseudarthrosis, one patient had 50% anterior subluxation that later united. Two deep infections were successfully treated with wound washout and antibiotics. Conclusions: Cervico-thoracic osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis continues to be challenging and hazardous. C7 decancellisation and extension osteotomy supplemented with segmental internal fixation provides immediate spinal stability, reduces sagittal spinal translation and associated high risk of neurological injury, whilst maintaining correction until bony union

Post Traumatic Fixed Thoraco-Lumbar Spinal Deformity may result in pain, regional and or global spinal deformity and neural compromise. Treatment is demanding as osteotomy is required in either anterior alone or both anterior and posterior spinal columns with concomitant reconstruction. This paper reviews 15 years experience with these cases. A retrospective review of 21 patients operated on over 15 years was conducted. Patients were grouped based on original thoraco-lumbar injury pattern – Type A, B and C. Osteotomies and reconstruction were performed from both anterior and posterior approaches dependent upon the pathology. Clinical and radiological follow up for all patients was a minimum of one year. Analysis of outcomes was performed in relation to the clinical and radiological success. Complications were recorded. Sixteen patients had two-column involvement and five had only the anterior column affected. Initial injury patterns were – Type A–9, Type B–4, and Type C–8. Approaches were anterior in six (five in Type A injuries), posterior and anterior in 11 (five two-stage and six three-stage operations), and posterior only in four (one pedicle subtraction osteotomy, one vertebral column resection, one posterior reduction of a dislocation, and one case abandoned after the posterior procedure). Anterior reconstruction was performed with structural iliac crest (two), titanium mesh cages (14) and expanding corpectomy cages (three). All 14 cases requiring posterior stabilisation were treated with pedicle screw based systems. The global assessment of outcome was individualised to the original indication – mechanical pain, deformity, and or symptomatic spinal stenosis. Success (good or excellent outcome) was achieved in 16 cases. Failure (fair or poor outcome) occur red in three completed cases. These three cases had chronic pain (two major, one minor). Two patients had incomplete assessment – one dying of MI in recovery after a technically successful procedure – and one developing deep infection with abandonment of the later stages (see above). There was one non-union. There were no neurological complications. Delayed treatment of late posttraumatic deformity is challenging however good results are achievable with attention to the specific clinical and biomechanical requirements of each case. Technical failure occurred with inadequately radical intervention on one occasion. Major chronic thoracotomy pain occurred in one otherwise technically successful reconstruction

Introduction: The management of patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures has evolved over the last 60 years from the days of conservative management through to the current era of anterior decompression combined with either anterior or posterior stabilisation. There is no doubt that surgical outcomes have improved markedly with the more modern techniques. Nevertheless, there are still technical and other difficulties, which the surgeon may encounter. Based upon his experience with posterior vertebrectomy and reconstruction for thoracolumbar tumours, the author has used this technique for the management of acute burst fractures in this region. This paper presents a review of 10 patients with severe thoracolumbar burst fracture or fracture dislocation managed since 1997, using a single stage posterior decompression, realignment and stabilisation/interbody fusion. Methods: Data were acquired prospectively on consecutive patients between June 1997 and October 2000. All patients underwent single stage posterior decompression via laminectomy and then a subtotal eggshell vertebrectomy with removal of any herniated bone fragment(s) or partial vertebrectomy/ pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Pedicle screw stabilisation was performed to include one or two vertebrae above and below the involved vertebra(e). The intervertebral discs adjacent to the fractured vertebra were removed prior to realigning the vertebral column and performing inter-body fusion using carbon fibre spacers and autograft (4 patients) or vertebral body reconstruction with Titanium mesh cages and autograft (6 patients). Results: The mean age was 37 years (21–52 years). There were six males and four females. Three patients had no neurological deficit. Seven had incomplete paraplegia, three of which were severe with no or only a flicker of leg movement. The principal fracture involved L1 in 6 patients, L2 in 2, L4 in 1 and L5 in 1. Seven had herniated bone fragments occupying 90+% of the spinal canal. Of the seven patients with incomplete paraplegia, all recovered the ability to walk. Two with conus lesions still self catheterize. There were no serious early complications. A serious late complication was the development at three months of a severe deep wound infection, which required debridement and subsequent anterior/ posterior revision surgery. One patient with severe polytrauma and an L4 burst fracture/dislocation has developed a chronic pain syndrome. Discussion: The decompression, realignment, interbody reconstruction and stabilisation of thoracolumbar burst fractures/dislocations using a single stage posterior technique is technically demanding but the neurological outcome and restoration of spinal balance in these 10 patients was gratifying. The procedure appears to have two advantages over an anterior decompression and reconstruction combined with anterior or posterior stabilisation: first, it appears to provide easier access and improved visualisation for lumbar burst fractures where the psoas muscle may be swollen and contused, and second, it allows for easier realignment of any coronal or sagittal deformity

Aims

A variety of surgical methods and strategies have been demonstrated for Andersson lesion (AL) therapy. In 2011, we proposed and identified the feasibility of stabilizing the spine without curettaging the vertebral or discovertebral lesion to cure non-kyphotic AL. Additionally, due to the excellent reunion ability of ankylosing spondylitis, we further came up with minimally invasive spinal surgery (MIS) to avoid the need for both bone graft and lesion curettage in AL surgery. However, there is a paucity of research into the comparison between open spinal fusion (OSF) and early MIS in the treatment of AL. The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the clinical outcomes and radiological evaluation of our early MIS approach and OSF for AL.

The February 2014 Spine Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: single posterior approach for severe kyphosis; risk factors for recurrent disc herniation; dysphagia and cervical disc replacement or fusion; hang on to your topical antibiotics; cost-effective lumbar disc replacement; anxiolytics no role to play in acute lumbar back pain; and surgery best for lumbar disc herniation.