Aims. The aims of this study were to assess mapping models to predict the three-level version of EuroQoL five-dimension utility index (EQ-5D-3L) from the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and validate these before and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods. A retrospective cohort of 5,857 patients was used to create the prediction models, and a second cohort of 721 patients from a different centre was used to validate the models, all of whom underwent TKA. Patient characteristics, BMI, OKS, and EQ-5D-3L were collected preoperatively and one year postoperatively. Generalized linear regression was used to formulate the prediction models. Results. There were significant correlations between the OKS and EQ-5D-3L preoperatively (r = 0.68; p < 0.001) and postoperatively (r = 0.77; p < 0.001) and for the change in the scores (r = 0.61; p < 0.001). Three different models (preoperative, postoperative, and change) were created. There were no significant differences between the actual and predicted mean EQ-5D-3L utilities at any timepoint or for change in the scores (p > 0.090) in the validation cohort. There was a significant correlation between the actual and predicted EQ-5D-3L utilities preoperatively (r = 0.63; p < 0.001) and postoperatively (r = 0.77; p < 0.001) and for the change in the scores (r = 0.56; p < 0.001). Bland-Altman plots demonstrated that a lower utility was overestimated, and higher utility was underestimated. The individual predicted EQ-5D-3L that was within ± 0.05 and ± 0.010 (minimal clinically important difference (MCID)) of the actual EQ-5D-3L varied between 13% to 35% and 26% to 64%, respectively, according to timepoint assessed and change in the scores, but was not significantly different between the modelling and validation cohorts (p ≥ 0.148). Conclusion. The OKS can be used to estimate EQ-5D-3L. Predicted individual patient utility error beyond the MCID varied from one-third to two-thirds depending on timepoint assessed, but the mean for a cohort did not differ and could be employed for this purpose. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):573–581

Publication of normal and expected outcome scores is necessary to provide a benchmark for auditing purposes following arthroplasty surgery. We have used the Oxford knee score to monitor the progress of knee replacements undertaken since 1995, the start of our review programme. 4847 Oxford assessments were analysed over an 8 year follow-up period. The mean pre-operative Oxford knee score was 39.2, all post-operative reviews showed a significant improvement. Patients with a BMI > 40, and the under 50 age group showed early deterioration in outcome scores, returning to pre-operative levels by 5 and 7 years respectively. There was no significant difference in outcome between surgeons performing < 20 knee replacements a year and those performing > 100 / year. The age of the patient at the time of surgery and the pre-operative body habitus have been identified as factors affecting long term outcome of total knee replacement surgery. Awareness of these factors may assist surgeons in advising patients of their expected outcomes following surgery

Abstract. Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) can be completed using paper and postal services (pPROMS) or via computer, tablet or smartphone (ePROMs). We have investigated whether there are differences in scores depending on the method of PROMs acquisition for the Oxford Knee (OKS) and the EQ-5D scores, at one and two years post operatively. Patient demographics, mode of preferred data collection and pre-and post-operative PROMs for Total Knee Replacements (TKRs) performed between 1st January 2018 and 31st December 2018 were collected. During the study period, 1573 patients underwent TKRs. The average OHS and EQ-5D pre-operatively scores was 19.47 and 0.40 respectively. 71.46% opted to undertake post-operative questionnaires using ePROMs. The remaining 28.54% opted for pPROMS. The one and two-year OHS for ePROMS patients increased to 37.64 and 39.76 while the OHS scores for pPROMS patients were 35.71 and 36.83. At the one and two-year post-operative time intervals, a Mann-Whitney test showed statistical significance between the modes of administration for OHS (P-Value = 0.044 and 0.01 respectively). The one and two-year EQ-5D for ePROMS patients increased to 0.76 and 0.78 while the EQ-5D scores for pPROMS patients were 0.73 and 0.76. The P-Value for Mann-Whitney tests comparing the modes of administration for EQ-5D were 0.04 and 0.07 respectively. There is no agreed mode of PROMs data acquisition for the OKS and EQ-5D Scores. While we have demonstrated an apparent difference in scores depending on the mode of administration, further work is required to establish the influence of potentially confounding factors

Introduction. The Oxford Knee Score is a well validated, commonly used scoring system. Previous studies have suggested that the score is influenced by demographic differences between patients in particular the functional component more than the pain and clinical components. The aim of this study was to further assess this using a large number of patients. Methods. The pre, 3 months and 12 months post-surgical Oxford Knee Scores were collected from 1492 patients from five distinct demographic locations undergoing total knee arthroplasty over twelve years under the care of 8 different consultants. A total of 735 patients had complete data sets. The scores were than analysed to test whether age, postcode, sex or consultant in charge had any significant effects on the outcome. Results. No significant difference in outcome was found between the five locations used in the study. This was also the case when different consultants were compared however when the results are adjusted for age there was a significant difference (p=0.019). In this study female patients had higher scores at both 3 and 12 months (significance p=0.011 and 0.044 respectively). Age of patient was also found to be of borderline significance when determining the post-operative scores. Conclusion. This large patient sample study shows that the Oxford Knee Score in post-operative patients is not as heavily influenced by demography as previously suggested. The results show that patients who are older and/or male will have better outcomes from knee arthroplasty. Individual surgeons do not significantly affect the outcome although some surgeons may have better results when age of patient is taken into account. Lastly, post code and life style has no significant influence on the outcome neither should be taken for any consideration for surgery

Introduction. The Oxford Knee Score is a well validated, commonly used scoring system. Previous studies have suggested that the score is influenced by demographic differences between patients in particular the functional component more than the pain and clinical components. The aim of this study was to further assess this using a large number of patients. Methods. The pre, 3 months and 12 months post-surgical Oxford Knee Scores were collected from 1492 patients from five distinct demographic locations undergoing total knee arthroplasty over twelve years under the care of 8 different consultants. A total of 735 patients had complete data sets. The scores were than analysed to test whether age, postcode, sex or consultant in charge had any significant effects on the outcome. Results. No significant difference in outcome was found between the five locations used in the study. This was also the case when different consultants were compared however when the results are adjusted for age there was a significant difference (p=0.019). In this study female patients had higher scores at both 3 and 12 months (significance p=0.011 and 0.044 respectively). Age of patient was also found to be of borderline significance when determining the post-operative scores. Conclusion. This large patient sample study shows that the Oxford Knee Score in post-operative patients is not as heavily influenced by demography as previously suggested. The results show that patients who are older and/or male will have better outcomes from knee arthroplasty. Individual surgeons do not significantly affect the outcome although some surgeons may have better results when age of patient is taken into account. Lastly, post code and life style has no significant influence on the outcome neither should be taken for any consideration for surgery

Source of the study: University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand and University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) is a 12-item questionnaire used to track knee arthroplasty outcomes. Validation of such patient reported outcome measures is typically anchored to a single question based on patient ‘satisfaction’, however risk of subsequent revision surgery is also an important outcome measure. The OKS can predict subsequent revision risk within two years, however it is not known which item(s) are the strongest predictors. Our aim was to identify which questions were most relevant in the prediction of subsequent knee arthroplasty revision risk. . All primary TKAs (n=27,708) and UKAs (n=8,415) captured by the New Zealand Joint Registry between 1999 and 2019 with at least one OKS response at six months, five years or ten years post-surgery were included. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were used to assess prediction models at six months, five years and ten years. Q1 ‘overall pain’ was the strongest predictor of revision within two years (TKA: 6 months, odds ratio (OR) 1.37; 5 years, OR 1.80; 10 years, OR 1.43; UKA: 6 months, OR 1.32; 5 years, OR 2.88; 10 years, OR 1.85; all p<0.05). A reduced model with just three questions (Q1, Q6 ‘limping when walking’, Q10 ‘knee giving way’) showed comparable or better diagnostic ability with the full OKS (area under the curve (AUC): TKA: 6 months, 0.77 vs. 0.76; 5 years, 0.78 vs. 0.75; 10 years, 0.76 vs. 0.73; UKA: 6 months, 0.80 vs. 0.78; 5 years: 0.81 vs. 0.77; 10 years, 0.80 vs. 0.77). The three questions on overall knee pain, limping when walking, and knee ‘giving way’ were the strongest predictors of subsequent revision within two years. Attention to the responses for these three key questions during follow-up may allow for prompt identification of patients most at risk of revision

Purpose. To examine the clinical characteristics of patients undergoing knee arthroplasty with a pre-operative Oxford Knee Score >34 (‘good’/‘excellent’), and assess the appropriateness of surgical intervention for this group. Background. In the current cost-constrained health economy, justification of surgical intervention is increasingly sought. As a validated disease-specific outcome measure, the pre-operative Oxford Knee Score (OKS) has been suggested as a possible threshold measurement in knee arthroplasty. However, contrary to expectations, analysis of pre-operative OKS in the joint registry population demonstrates a normal distribution curve with a sub-group of high-scoring patients. This suggests that either the baseline OKS does not accurately define surgical threshold, or that patients with a high OKS are inappropriately having knee replacements. Methods. Retrospective case-note review of patients listed for primary Knee arthroplasty (n=1058), with a preoperative OKS >34 (n=44). Data was extracted, with analysis of referral criteria, clinical presentation, radiological changes (Kellgren-Lawrence), and content analysis of the appropriateness of knee arthroplasty. Age and gender differences were compared between OKS<34 and OKS>34 groups. Results. No significant difference was observed in age between groups. Gender distribution in the OKS>34 group was 2:1(M:F) compared with 1:1.3 (M:F) in the OKS<34 group. Once listed for surgery, 81.8% proceeded with arthroplasty, while 18.2% cancelled due to improvement in symptoms. A contralateral knee arthroplasty had been performed in 10(22.8%), and previous arthroscopy in 15(34.1%) cases. Advanced radiological changes were observed in 33(75.0%) cases. Based on available information, surgery was deemed appropriate in 54.5%, questionable 15.9%, and perhaps inappropriate in 4.5% cases (insufficient information for categorisation 25.0%). Conclusion. A small group of patients deemed appropriate for knee arthroplasty present with high pre-operative OKS. Pre-operative OKS appears insensitive to the individual factors involved in defining treatment allocation, and further assessment is required. Introduction of pre-operative threshold scores cannot be currently recommended for knee arthroplasty

Introduction: The Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Hemiarthroplasty has been used in the Nelson region by three surgeons for over 10 years. This prosthesis has had favourable reports from the designers, with a 98% surviving 10-years or more. Other series have reported less successful results. Aim: To evaluate the performance of this prosthesis in a provincial area. Methods: Using the established audit system all patients were retrieved and their notes were reviewed. The patients were reviewed as outpatients according to the Oxford 12-item knee score and basic data were collected. Standardised radiographs were taken. Patients living out of the area were interviewed by telephone. Sixty-three prostheses were implanted in 54 patients. Follow-up was from 55 to 144 months. Eighteen patients had died. Eight prostheses had been revised between four to 82months after the initial surgery. Of the patients who were reviewed, the average Oxford Knee score was 20. Two patients were not satisfied with the prosthesis. Conclusions: These results are comparable with other non-designer series for the Oxford Knee. Patients who had successful replacements scored well and were very happy with their surgery, but there was a significant failure rate that must be taken into account when selecting patients for this prosthesis

Purpose: Resurgence in mobile bearing unicompartmental arthroplasty o the knee has come to Canada in last 3 years. This has been attributed to the popularity of minimally invasive surgery, improved instrumentation, and encouraging outcome results from the developers and others. A prospective study was undertaken at an academic institution to evaluate the initial experience with the first 400 Oxford knees. Methods: Oxford unicompartmental knees have been implanted since Feb 2001 at our institution. A majority of these were entered into the Ontario Joint Registry. All others were retrieved from hospital records to capture 100% of all cases done form our institution. All surgeons attended an Oxford training course. The main outcome of interest was repeat surgery revision for any cause, including revision. Results: Three hundred and fifty Oxford knees with minimum 1 year follow up were available for study. Three surgeons have implanted 90 % of the implants. Fourteen patients have come to revision surgery as of October 1, 2005 for an incidence of 3,7 %. Causes include rapid lateral compartment deterioration (6), persisting medial pain (6), and medial collateral ligament disruption (1). Ten were revised to ttoal knee arthroplasty (8 cruciate retaining and 2 posterior stabilized), except the ligament disruption, which was reconstructed with Achilles allograft. Two others had open debridement for medial pain. This rate of revision is higher than reported in literature. Severe obesity (BMI > 35) was a factor in 4 failures. Conclusions: Our experience was not as successful as reported in the literature from the prosthesis designers. Causes include poor technique and inappropriate indications when scrutinized closely. The temptation to stretch indications must be tempered by acceptance of higher revision rate than reported in literature and should be part of informed consent. Survivorship should be institution specific and not that of original published data from the developers

A large proportion of wait times for primary total knee (TKA) and hip (THA) arthroplasty is the time from primary care referral to surgical consultation. To our knowledge, no study has investigated whether a referral Oxford Knee or Hip Score (OKHS) could be used to triage non-surgical referrals appropriately. The primary purpose of the current study was to determine if a referral OKHS has the predictive ability to discriminate when a knee or hip referral will be deemed conservative as compared to surgical by the surgeon during their first consultation, and to identify an OKHS cut-off point that accurately predicts when a primary TKA or THA referral will be deemed conservative. We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive primary TKA and THA consultations from a single surgeon's tertiary, high volume practice over a three-year period. Patients with a pre-consultation OKHS, BMI < 4 1, and no absolute contraindication to TJR were included. Consultation knees/hips were categorized into two groups based on surgeon's decision, those that were offered TJR during their first consolation (surgical) versus those that were not (conservative). Baseline demographic data and OKHS were abstracted. Variables of interest were compared between cohorts using the exact chi-square test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were used to measure association between pre-consult OKHS and the surgeon's decision. A receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to calculate the area under the curve (AUC) and to identify a cut-off point for the pre-operative OKHS that identified whether or not a referral was deemed conservative. TKA and THA referrals were analyzed separately. The study included 1,436 knees (1,016 patients) with a median OKS of 25 (IQR 19–32) and 478 hips (388 patients) with a median OHS of 22 (IQR 16–29). Median pre-consultation OKHS demonstrated clinically and statistically significant differences between the surgical versus conservative cohorts (p 32 (sensitivity=0.997, NPV=0.992) and for hips is OHS >34 (sensitivity=0.997 NPV=0.978). ROC analysis identified severable potential lower OKHS thresholds, depending on weight of prioritization of sensitivity, specificity, and NPV. Referral OKS and OHS demonstrate good ability to discriminate when a primary TKA or THA referral will be deemed non-surgical versus surgical at their first consultation in a single surgeon's practice. Multiple potential effective OKHS thresholds can be applied as a tool to decrease wait times for primary joint arthroplasty. However, a cost analysis would aid in identifying the optimal cut-off score, and these findings need to be externally validated before they can be broadly applied

Aim. To assess the efficacy and ease of use of the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) in soft tissue knee pathology. Method. In a prospective study, we compared the OKS against the International Knee Documentation Committee 2000 (IKDC) and the Lysholm Scores (Lys). We also assessed the OKS with retrograde (Reversed OKS: 48=worst symptoms, 0=asymptomatic) and antegrade (as currently used in Oxford) numbering. All patients completed 3 questionnaires (OKS, Lys, and IKDC, or RevOKS, Lys, and IKDC) stating which was the simplest from their perspective. We recruited 93 patients from the orthopaedic and physiotherapy clinics. All patients between the ages of 15 and 45 with soft tissue knee derangements, such as ligamentous, and meniscal injuries were included. Exclusions were made in patients with degenerative and/or inflammatory arthritidis. Patients who had sustained bony injuries or underwent bony surgery were also excluded. Results. The distribution of the soft tissue injuries was: Meniscal tears (35%), anterior cruciate ligament injuries (23%), anterior knee pain (22%), other injuries (12%), and collateral ligament damage (8%). Linear regression analysis revealed no significant difference between all 3 scores (R squared=0.7823, P<0.0001). The OKS correlated best with the IKDC (r=0.7483), but less so with the Lys (r=0.3278). The reversed OKS did not correlate as well (R squared= 0.2603) with either the IKDC (r= -0.2978) or the Lys (r=-0.2586). ANOVA showed the OKS to be significantly easier than Lys to complete (p<0.0001), but not significantly easier than IKDC (p>0.05). Conclusion. The OKS is patient friendly and reliable in assessing soft tissue knee injury. This is particularly useful if the OKS is already in use within a department for assessment of degenerative disease. The Oxford Knee score should be used in an antegrade fashion (with a score of 48/48 corresponding to maximum symptoms) to give the best results in objective assessment

Aim: To assess the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) for the assessment of soft tissue knee pathology?. Method: In a prospective study, we compared the OKS against the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC 2000) and the Lysholm Scores (Lys). We also assessed the OKS with retrograde and antegrade (as currently used in Oxford) numbering. All patients completed 3 questionnaires stating which was the simplest from their perspective. We recruited 73 patients from the orthopaedic and physiotherapy clinics, meeting the following criteria:. Results: Linear regression analysis revealed no significant difference between all 3 scores (R. 2. =0.7823, P< 0.0001). The OKS correlated best with the IKDC (r=0.7483, Fig1), but less so with the Lys (r=0.3278, Fig2). The reversed OKS did not correlate as well (R. 2. = 0.2603) with either the IKDC (r= −0.2978) or the Lys (r= −0.2586). ANOVA showed the OKS to be significantly easier than Lys to complete (p< 0.0001), but not significantly easier than IKDC (p> 0.05). Conclusion: The OKS is patient friendly and reliable in assessing soft tissue knee injury. This is particularly useful if the OKS is already in use within a department for measurement of severity of degenerative disease

A long surgical procedure length has been well associated with worse clinical outcomes, also in an economic climate where in the theatre, time is money, surgical procedures are done very rapidly. Few studies have documented the clinical outcomes of procedure speed. Using the New Zealand Registry we reviewed the operation time of 41,560 primary knee joint replacements. These were split into groups of time slots for the surgery from less than 40 minutes, 40–59, 60–89, 90–119, 120–179 and greater than 180mins. This was referenced to the oxford knee scores obtained and the revision rate. For operations done in less than 40 or greater than 180 minutes, the oxford knee score was lower by 5 years. The revision rate was also increased in these same groups. Operations done in greater than 180 minutes are generally the more complex non-osteoarthrtic and tumour cases and have a higher revision rate reflecting their complexity. Procedures done less than 40 minutes are more straight forward, but there is a relationship shown between this speed and revision rate and poorer outcome. The cause is likely multifactorial, but begs the question, does speed kill?

Aims. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate machine-learning-based computerized adaptive tests (CATs) for the Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), and the Oxford Elbow Score (OES) and its subscales. Methods. We developed CAT algorithms for the OHS, OKS, OSS, overall OES, and each of the OES subscales, using responses to the full-length questionnaires and a machine-learning technique called regression tree learning. The algorithms were evaluated through a series of simulation studies, in which they aimed to predict respondents’ full-length questionnaire scores from only a selection of their item responses. In each case, the total number of items used by the CAT algorithm was recorded and CAT scores were compared to full-length questionnaire scores by mean, SD, score distribution plots, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, intraclass correlation (ICC), and the Bland-Altman method. Differences between CAT scores and full-length questionnaire scores were contextualized through comparison to the instruments’ minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Results. The CAT algorithms accurately estimated 12-item questionnaire scores from between four and nine items. Scores followed a very similar distribution between CAT and full-length assessments, with the mean score difference ranging from 0.03 to 0.26 out of 48 points. Pearson’s correlation coefficient and ICC were 0.98 for each 12-item scale and 0.95 or higher for the OES subscales. In over 95% of cases, a patient’s CAT score was within five points of the full-length questionnaire score for each 12-item questionnaire. Conclusion. Oxford Hip Score, Oxford Knee Score, Oxford Shoulder Score, and Oxford Elbow Score (including separate subscale scores) CATs all markedly reduce the burden of items to be completed without sacrificing score accuracy. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(10):786–794

The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) is a valid and reliable self-administered patient questionnaire that enables assessment of the outcome following total knee replacement (TKR). There is as yet no literature on the behavioral trends of the OKS over time. Our aim is to present a retrospective audit of the OKS for patients who have undergone TKR during the past ten years. We retrospectively analysed 3276 OKS of patients who had a primary TKR and had been registered as part of a multi-surgeon, outcome-monitoring program at St. Helier hospital. The OKS was gathered pre-operatively and post-operatively by means of postal questionnaires at annual intervals. Patients were grouped as per their age at operation into four groups: 60, 61-70, 71- 80 and >80. A cross-sectional analysis of OKS at different time points was performed. The numbers of OKS available for analysis were 504 pre-operatively, 589 at one-year, 512 at two-year and gradually decreasing numbers with 87 knees ten-year post-operatively. There was as expected a significant decrease (improvement) of the OKS between pre-operative and one-year post-operative period and then reached a plateau. Beyond eight years, there is a gradual rise in the score (deterioration). The younger patients (60) showed a significant increase in their average OKS between one and five-years post-operatively. However beyond five years, they followed the trend of their older counterparts. When the twelve questions in the OKS were analysed, certain components revealed greater improvement (e.g. description of knee pain and limping) than others (e.g. night pain). The OKS is seen to plateau a year after TKR. According to the OKS the outcome of the TKR is not as good in the younger age group as compared to the older age group. Further investigation is required to ascertain the cause of this observed difference

Background: In a recent publication from the National Joint Registry it was suggested that prosthesis type influenced patient satisfaction at one year following knee arthroplasty. In this report Unicondylar Replacement (UKR) was associated with lower levels of patient satisfaction when compared to cemented TKR. The unicondylar group did however have a significantly lower Oxford Knee Score (OKS) than the TKR group and this occurred irrespective of patient age. A common perception is that UKR is only offered to patients with lesser disease, with a decreased clinical profile. This may explain their higher levels of dissatisfaction as the overall change in their OKS from pre to post operation would be relatively smaller than for TKR. Aim: We hypothesised that patients listed for UKR have less severe disease and therefore a lower preoperative OKS when compared to TKR. Methods: After sample size calculation we retrospectively analysed 76 patients who underwent either UKR or TKR under the care of a single surgeon. OKS was recorded at a dedicated pre-assessment clinic. The decision to offer UKR was based on clinical and radiological criteria as outlined by the Oxford group. Results: There were 38 patients in either group. The mean pre-operative OKS was 39.5 (26–56, SD 7.6) in the UKR group and 41.6 (31–51, SD 5.7) in the TKR group. There was no statistical difference between these two groups (p=0.18). Discussion: Patients listed for knee replacement have significant pain and functional impairment. In our population those suitable for UKR have similarly severe symptoms to those who do not meet the criteria for UKR and are only eligible for TKR. It remains unclear why patients undergoing UKR should be less satisfied when they have better post operative patient reported outcome scores. It emphasizes the need for careful patient selection and counselling in patient undergoing UKR

All patients undergoing knee arthroplasty at our institution complete Oxford Knee Scoring (OKS) at nurse-led pre-assessment and again at an admission physiotherapy visit on the ward which may be up to 2 months later. The aim of this study is to establish the extended reproducibility of the OKS by statistical analysis of scores taken at these intervals. 44 patients were required to achieve a 90 % probability to detect a difference at a two-sided 5 % significance level with a minimum clinical difference of 3 points, a cut off used in previous works regarding the use of OKS. Both the overall population means and the differences between individual questions were analysed by a paired samples t test and a Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test respectively. Mean interval between attendance for pre-assessment and admission visit was 16 days (7–60). A statistically significant result at the 5% level was observed for the t test t= 2.197 (44df), p= 0.03. OKS at pre-assessment was lower than at admission to the ward by 1.1 point. (−2.1 – 0.9 95% CI). Analysis of difference between individual questions revealed only three of the pairs achieved statistical significance and in each case, the difference was less than 3 scoring units. This study demonstrates that although there is a difference in total scoring using the OKS between two patient episodes prior to arthroplasty, a clinically relevant difference is not detected, and neither is a statistically significant difference detected when all scoring steps are analysed. The original validation of the OKS was obtained using test-retest reproducibility over a 24 hour period. This work shows that the OKS is robust to violations in reproducibility at duration much greater than this and for practical purposes is valid if taken at any point during the pre-admission phase of care

Introduction: The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) is commonly used in the assessment of outcome for knee arthroplasty. All patients having knee arthroplasty at our institution undergo OKS at both nurse led pre-assessment and admission physiotherapy visit, a period of 10 to 30 days pre-operatively. At both instances, the scoring form is left with the patient and collected at the end of the visit. Anecdotal evidence from our centre suggested that patients attending for arthroplasty surgery were scoring differently at each visit. The aim of this study is to establish if there is a significant difference OKS at pre-assessment visit and on admission to the ward. Statistical Method: A pilot study was carried out. A power calculation revealed a requirement for 44 patients to enter the study. The resultant probability was 90 percent that the study would detect a difference at a two sided 5.0 percent significance level, if the minimum clinical difference is 3 points. This is based on the standard deviation of the difference in the response variables of 6. A clinical difference of 3 is drawn from previous studies investigating the use of the OKS. 44 patients undergoing arthroplasty surgery had their OKS for both visits retrospectively analysed. The mean of the totals of both visits was analysed and found to conform to normality and hence was further investigated by a paired samples t test. Comparison of individual scoring revealed a violation of normality and hence was further analysed using a Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test. Results: A statistically significant result at the 5% level was observed t= 2.197 (44df), p= 0.03. OKS at pre-assessment was lower than at admission to the ward by 1.1 point. (−2.1 – 0.9 95% CI). Analysis of the individual scoring at both intervals revealed only three of the pairs achieved statistical significance and in each case, the difference was less than 3 scoring units. No significant difference was seen when time between assessments was analysed. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that although there is a difference in total scoring using the OKS between two patient episodes prior to arthroplasty, a clinically relevant difference is not detected, and neither is a statistically significant difference detected when all scoring steps are analysed. This work supports earlier studies that pre-operative assessment using the OKS is robust to variance in the pre-operative scoring window

Purpose. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) is a validated and widely used PROM that has been successfully used in assessing the outcome of knee arthroplasty (KA). It has been adopted as the nationally agreed outcome measure for this procedure and is now routinely collected. Increasingly, it is being used on an individual patient basis as a pre-operative measure of osteoarthritis and the need for joint replacement, despite not being validated for this use. The aim of this paper is to present evidence that challenges this new role for the OKS. Method. We have analysed pre-operative and post-operative OKS data from 3 large cohorts all undergoing KA, totalling over 3000 patients. In addition we have correlated the OKS to patient satisfaction scores. We have validated our findings using data published from the UK NJR. Results. Our data confirms of the effectiveness of the OKS in assessing the results of KA in populations of patients. Nearly all patients who undergo KA have an improvement in their OKS, regardless of the pre-operative score. However, we have found that the pre-operative OKS cannot predict a poor outcome after KA and patients with the best pre-operative OKS have the best outcome as measured by patient satisfaction. Conclusion. These data suggest that the OKS remains an excellent tool for assessing the outcome of knee arthroplasty in cohorts of patients, but further evidence is required of its validity for decisions regarding individual patients. Great care should be taken in using the pre-operative OKS to predict outcome after KA and its use in ranking patients need for surgery cannot be supported