Shoulder arthroplasty humeral stem design has evolved to accommodate patient anatomy characteristics. As a result, stems are available in numerous shapes, coatings, lengths, sizes, and vary by fixation method. This abundance of stem options creates a surgical paradox of choice. Metrics describing stem stability, including a stem's resistance to subsidence and micromotion, are important factors that should influence stem selection, but have yet to be assessed in response to the diametral (i.e., thickness) sizing of short stem humeral implants. Eight paired cadaveric humeri (age = 75±15 years) were reconstructed with surgeon selected ‘standard’ sized short-stemmed humeral implants, as well as 2mm ‘oversized’ implants. Stem sizing conditions were randomized to left and right humeral pairs. Following implantation, an anteroposterior radiograph was taken of each stem and the metaphyseal and diaphyseal fill ratios were quantified. Each humerus was then potted in polymethyl methacrylate bone cement and subjected to 2000 cycles of 90º forward flexion loading. At regular intervals during loading, stem subsidence and micromotion were assessed using a validated system of two optical markers attached to the stem and humeral pot (accuracy of <15µm). The metaphyseal fill ratio did not differ significantly between the oversized and standard stems (0.50±0.06 vs 0.50±0.10; P = 0.997, Power = 0.05); however, the diaphyseal fill ratio did (0.52±0.06 vs 0.45±0.07; P < 0.001, Power = 1.0). Neither fill ratio correlated significantly with stem subsidence or micromotion. Stem subsidence and micromotion were found to plateau following 400 cycles of loading. Oversizing stem thickness prevented implant head-back contact in all but one specimen with the least dense metaphyseal bone, while standard sizing only yielded incomplete head-back contact in the two subjects with the densest bone. Oversized stems subsided significantly less than their standard counterparts (standard: 1.4±0.6mm, oversized: 0.5±0.5mm; P = 0.018, Power = 0.748;), and resulted in slightly more micromotion (standard: 169±59µm, oversized: 187±52µm, P = 0.506, Power = 0.094,). Short stem diametral sizing (i.e., thickness) has an impact on stem subsidence and micromotion following humeral arthroplasty. In both cases, the resulting three-dimensional stem micromotion exceeded, the 150µm limit suggested for bone ingrowth, although that limit was derived from a uniaxial assessment. Though not statistically significant, the increased stem micromotion associated with stem oversizing may in-part be attributed to over-compacting the cancellous bed during broaching, which creates a denser, potentially smoother, interface, though this influence requires further assessment. The findings of the present investigation highlight the importance of proper short stem diametral sizing, as even a relatively small, 2mm, increase can negatively impact the subsidence and micromotion of the stem-bone construct. Future work should focus on developing tools and methods to support surgeons in what is currently a subjective process of stem selection

Shoulder arthroplasty is effective at restoring function and relieving pain in patients suffering from glenohumeral arthritis; however, cortex thinning has been significantly associated with larger press-fit stems (fill ratio = 0.57 vs 0.48; P = 0.013)1. Additionally, excessively stiff implant-bone constructs are considered undesirable, as high initial stiffness of rigid fracture fixation implants has been related to premature loosening and an ultimate failure of the implant-bone interface2. Consequently, one objective which has driven the evolution of humeral stem design has been the reduction of stress-shielding induced bone resorption; this in-part has led to the introduction of short stems, which rely on metaphyseal fixation. However, the selection of short stem diametral (i.e., thickness) sizing remains subjective, and its impact on the resulting stem-bone construct stiffness has yet to be quantified.

Eight paired cadaveric humeri (age = 75±15 years) were reconstructed with surgeon selected ‘standard’ sized and 2mm ‘oversized’ short-stemmed implants. Standard stem sizing was based on a haptic assessment of stem and broach stability per typical surgical practice. Anteroposterior radiographs were taken, and the metaphyseal and diaphyseal fill ratios were quantified. Each humerus was then potted in polymethyl methacrylate bone cement and subjected to 2000 cycles of compressive loading representing 90º forward flexion to simulate postoperative seating. Following this, a custom 3D printed metal implant adapter was affixed to the stem, which allowed for compressive loading in-line with the stem axis (Fig.1). Each stem was then forced to subside by 5mm at a rate of 1mm/min, from which the compressive stiffness of the stem-bone construct was assessed. The bone-implant construct stiffness was quantified as the slope of the linear portion of the resulting force-displacement curves.

The metaphyseal and diaphyseal fill ratios were 0.50±0.10 and 0.45±0.07 for the standard sized stems and 0.50±0.06 and 0.52±0.06 for the oversized stems, respectively. Neither was found to correlate significantly with the stem-bone construct stiffness measure (metaphysis: P = 0.259, diaphysis: P = 0.529); however, the diaphyseal fill ratio was significantly different between standard and oversized stems (P < 0.001, Power = 1.0). Increasing the stem size by 2mm had a significant impact on the stiffness of the stem-bone construct (P = 0.003, Power = 0.971; Fig.2). Stem oversizing yielded a construct stiffness of −741±243N/mm; more than double that of the standard stems, which was −334±120N/mm.

The fill ratios reported in the present investigation match well with those of a finite element assessment of oversizing short humeral stems3. This work complements that investigation's conclusion, that small reductions in diaphyseal fill ratio may reduce the likelihood of stress shielding, by also demonstrating that oversizing stems by 2mm dramatically increases the stiffness of the resulting implant-bone construct, as stiffer implants have been associated with decreased bone stimulus4 and premature loosening2. The present findings suggest that even a small, 2mm, variation in the thickness of short stem humeral components can have a marked influence on the resulting stiffness of the implant-bone construct. This highlights the need for more objective intraoperative methods for selecting stem size to provide guidelines for appropriate diametral sizing.

For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly.

Introduction

A recent paper suggested implanting an uncemented acetabular shell which is 6mm or greater than the native femoral head in total hip arthroplasty (THA) significantly increased the risk of postoperative pain. We retrospectively analyzed 265 Delta ceramic-on-ceramic (DCoC) THA comparing the native femoral head size to the implanted shell and reviewing if the patient suffered with post-operative pain (POP).

Each of the seven cuts required for a total knee arthroplasty has its own science, and can affect the outcome of surgery. Distal Femur. Sets the axial alignment (along with the tibial cut), and too little or too much depth affects ligament tension in extension. Anterior Femur. Sets the rotation of the femoral component, which affects patellar tracking. Internal rotation results in patellar maltracking. External rotation will either notch the femur, or cause too large a femoral component to be selected. Anterior and posterior femoral cuts also determine femoral component size selection. Too small a femoral component causes notching, flexion instability, and mismatch to the tibial component. Too big a femoral component causes overstuffing, periarticular pain, and patellar maltracking. Posterior Femur. Posterior referencing usually works, and the typical knee requires 3 degrees of external rotation to align with the transepicondylar axis. In valgus knees, there may be significant hypoplasia of the lateral femoral condyle, and posterior referencing has to be adjusted to avoid internal rotation. Posterior chamfer. A 4-in-one block saves time. Anterior chamfer. Deeper anterior chamfer allows a deeper trochlear groove, for patellar tracking. Tibia. Sets axial alignment with distal femoral cut. Posterior slope loosens flexion gap. Oversizing results in painful medial overhang. Lateral overhang usually not a problem. Undersizing results in inadequate bone support and subsidence. Patella. Inset or onset. Central peg associated with fracture. Err to medial and superior to assist tracking and avoid impingement on the tibial insert

To determine the mechanisms and extents of popliteus impingements before and after TKA and to investigate the influence of implant sizing. The hypotheses were that (i) popliteus impingements after TKA may occur at both the tibia and the femur and (ii) even with an apparently well-sized prosthesis, popliteal tracking during knee flexion is modified compared to the preoperative situation. The location of the popliteus in three cadaver knees was measured using computed tomography (CT), before and after implantation of plastic TKA replicas, by injecting the tendon with radiopaque liquid. The pre- and post-operative positions of the popliteus were compared from full extension to deep flexion using normosized, oversized and undersized implants (one size increments). At the tibia, TKA caused the popliteus to translate posteriorly, mostly in full extension: 4.1mm for normosized implants, and 15.8mm with oversized implants, but no translations were observed when using undersized implants. At the femur, TKA caused the popliteus to translate laterally at deeper flexion angles, peaking between 80º-120º: 2.0 mm for normosized implants and 2.6 mm with oversized implants. Three-dimensional analysis revealed prosthetic overhang at the postero-superior corner of normosized and oversized femoral components (respectively, up to 2.9 mm and 6.6 mm). A well-sized tibial component modifies popliteal tracking, while an undersized tibial component maintains more physiologic patterns. Oversizing shifts the popliteus considerably throughout the full arc of motion. This study suggests that both femoro- and tibio-popliteus impingements could play a role in residual pain and stiffness after TKA

Purpose. It is generally accepted that the cement mantle surrounding the femoral component of a cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) should be complete without any defects, and of at least 2 mm in thickness. Radiographic evaluation is the basis for assessment of the cement mantle. The adequacy of radiographic interpretation is subject to debate. Poor interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility of radiographic cement mantle assessment has been reported. In this study, 3D template software was used that allow anatomical measurements and analysis of three-dimensional digital femura geometry based on CT scans. The purpose of this study is to analyze the three-dimensional cement mantle thickness of cemented hip stem. Materials and Methods. 52 hips that underwent THA with Exeter stem (Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ) were enrolled in this study. All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon. There were 49 hips in 49 women and 3 hips in 3 men. The average age at surgery was 73 years (range, 60–88 years). The etiology of the hip lesions were osteoarthrosis in 49, rheumatoid arthritis in 3, and osteonecrosis of the femoral head in 1. For preoperative and postoperative evaluation, a CT scan of the pelvis and knee joint was obtained and was transferred to 3D template software (Zed hip, Lexi, Tokyo, Japan). We evaluated the alignment for stem anteversion/valgus/anterior tilt angles and the contact of the cortical bone with the cement mantle was evaluated. Results. Concerning the alignment of the stems, variability was observed in the anteversion; however, the stems were inserted in an almost neutral position in varus-valgus and extension-flexion. The 3D contact of the stems with a cement mantle of 2 mm added with the cortical bone was evaluated, and it could be broadly classified into three patterns: cases in which the cortical bone was not reamed in the range of 2 mm from the stem, those in which the distal medial part was partially reamed, and cases in which the distal anterior and medial parts of the cortical bone were reamed in a relatively wide range. In this study, there were 17 patients with no reaming, 32 patients with partial reaming, and 3 patients with a relatively large range of reaming. Discussion and Conclusion. Oversizing of the stem associated with incomplete cement mantles has been suggested to account for early femoral component loosening. In this study, 3 patients whose cortical bone was reamed in a relatively wide range and who had a risk of partial thinning of the cement mantle as a result were observed. The effect of reaming of the cortical bone on the clinical results is still unknown; however, a careful follow-up in the future may be required

Aims

The Exeter short stem was designed for patients with Dorr type A femora and short-term results are promising. The aim of this study was to evaluate the minimum five-year stem migration pattern of Exeter short stems in comparison with Exeter standard stems.