The NDI is a simple 10-item questionnaire used to assess patients with neck pain. The original validation was performed on 52 patients with neck pain and the test-retest on 17 whiplash patients with a 2-day interval. The SF36 measures functional ability, wellbeing and the overall health of patients. It is used in health economics to assess the health utility, gain and economic impact of medical interventions.

Objectives were to independently validate the NDI in patients with neck pain and to draw comparison between the NDI and SF36. 160 patients with neck pain attending the spinal clinic completed self-assessment questionnaires. A second questionnaire was completed in 34 patients after a period of 1-2 weeks.

The internal consistency of the NDI and SF36 was calculated using Cronbach alpha. The test-retest reliability was assessed using the Bland and Altman method and the concurrent validity between the two questionnaires was assessed using Pearson correlation.

Both questionnaires showed robust internal consistency: SF36 alpha = 0.878 (se=0.014, 95%CI=0.843 to 0.906) and NDI = 0.864 (se=0.017, 95%CI=0.825 to 0.894). The NDI had significant correlation to all eight domains of the SF36 (p<0.001). The individual scores for each of the ten items had significant correlation with the total disability score (p<0.001). The test-retest reliability of the NDI was acceptable.

We have shown irrefutably that the NDI has good reliability and validity and that it stands up well to the SF36.

Aims. The number of patients undergoing surgery for degenerative cervical radiculopathy has increased. In many countries, public hospitals have limited capacity. This has resulted in long waiting times for elective treatment and a need for supplementary private healthcare. It is uncertain whether the management of patients and the outcome of treatment are equivalent in public and private hospitals. The aim of this study was to compare the management and patient-reported outcomes among patients who underwent surgery for degenerative cervical radiculopathy in public and private hospitals in Norway, and to assess whether the effectiveness of the treatment was equivalent. Methods. This was a comparative study using prospectively collected data from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery. A total of 4,750 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for degenerative cervical radiculopathy and were followed for 12 months were included. Case-mix adjustment between those managed in public and private hospitals was performed using propensity score matching. The primary outcome measure was the change in the Neck Disability Index (NDI) between baseline and 12 months postoperatively. A mean difference in improvement of the NDI score between public and private hospitals of ≤ 15 points was considered equivalent. Secondary outcome measures were a numerical rating scale for neck and arm pain and the EuroQol five-dimension three-level health questionnaire. The duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, and complications were also recorded. Results. The mean improvement from baseline to 12 months postoperatively of patients who underwent surgery in public and private hospitals was equivalent, both in the unmatched cohort (mean NDI difference between groups 3.9 points (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.2 to 5.6); p < 0.001) and in the matched cohort (4.0 points (95% CI 2.3 to 5.7); p < 0.001). Secondary outcomes showed similar results. The duration of surgery and length of hospital stay were significantly longer in public hospitals. Those treated in private hospitals reported significantly fewer complications in the unmatched cohort, but not in the matched cohort. Conclusion. The clinical effectiveness of surgery for degenerative cervical radiculopathy performed in public and private hospitals was equivalent 12 months after surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(1):64–71

Abstract. Objectives. There is still controversy in the literature over whether Cervical Foraminotomy or Anterior Cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is best for treating cervical Radiculopathy. Numerous studies have focused on the respective complication rates of these procedures and outcome measures with a lack of due consideration to preoperative MRI findings. Proximal foraminal stenosis can theoretically be accessed via either approach. We aimed to investigate whether patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) favoured one approach over the other in patients with proximal foraminal stenosis. Methods. A single centre retrospective review of patients undergoing either ACDF or Cervical foraminotomy over the period 2012 to 2022. VAS, Neck disability index (NDI), EQ5DL and Patient Satisfaction on a Five Point Likert scale were obtained. Patients who had both an ACDF and a Foraminotomy were excluded. Axial MRI images were analysed and the location of the worst clinically relevant disc herniation stratified as follows: Central (1), Paracentral (2) and Foraminal (3). Correlations and average PROMs were analysed in SPSS. Results. PROMs scores were available for 33 ACDF patients and 37 Foraminotomy patients. Average surgery time in ACDF group was 167 minutes while Foraminotomy 142 minutes. Average Length of hospital stay was 6.24 days in the Foraminotomy group and 3.54 days in the ACDF group. 18 patients were excluded due to having both surgeries (2 of which developed CSF leaks postoperatively). Of the included patients there were no postoperative complications. 13 patients in the ACDF had Central or Paracentral stenosis in addition to proximal Foraminal stenosis, 3 patients in the Foraminotomy group had some significant Paracentral herniation just before the Proximal foramen. The majority of patients in both groups had pure proximal Foraminal stenosis (N= 17 (ACDF), 20 (Foraminotomy). The results showed no significant difference in PROMs between patients who received an ACDF or a Foraminotomy for Proximal foraminal stenosis (EQ5DL, NDI, and satisfaction, P= 0.268, 0.253 and 0.327). There was no correlation between location of the stenosis and PROM scores in either group. Conclusions. Our data suggest that Proximal foraminal stenosis can be effectively addressed by either an anterior ACDF or a Foraminotomy with no difference in complication rates. Foraminotomy has the benefit of no implant cost but longer hospital stay. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Introduction. Degeneration of the cervical spine can lead to neurological symptoms that require surgical intervention. Often, an anterior cervical discectomy (ACD) with fusion is performed with interposition of a cage. However, a cage substantially increases health care costs. The polymer polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) is an alternative to cages, associated with lower costs. The reported high-occurrence of non-fusion with PMMA is often seen as a drawback, but evidence for a correlation between radiological fusion and clinical outcome is absent. To investigate if the lower rate of fusion with PMMA has negative effects on long-term clinical outcome, we assessed the clinical results of ACD with PMMA as a intervertebral spacer with a 5–10 year follow-up. Methods. A retrospective cohort study among all patients who underwent a mono-level ACD with PMMA for degenerative cervical disease, between 2007–2012, was performed. Patients filled out an online questionnaire, developed to assess clinical long-term outcome, complications and re-operation rates. The primary outcome measure was the Neck Disability Index (NDI), secondary outcome measures were re-operation and complication rates. Results. Of 196 eligible patients, 90 patients were assessed (response rate 53%). The average NDI score at follow-up (mean 7.5 years) was 19.0 points ± 18.0 points. Complications occurred in 10% and re-operation in 8.8%. Conclusion. This study provides evidence of good long-term clinical results of ACD with PMMA, as the results were similar with long-term outcomes of ACD with a cage as spacer. Therefore, the results of this study may suggest that the use of PMMA is an lower-cost alternative. No conflicts of interests. No funding obtained

There is evidence that preoperative physical fitness impacts surgical outcomes, specifically preceding abdominal, cardiovascular and spine surgery. To our knowledge, there are no papers on self-reported exercise frequency as a predictor of cervical spine surgery outcomes. Our objectives were to quantify self-report of exercise frequency in cervical spine surgery patients, and to elucidate if self-reported exercise prior to surgery confers less pain, improved health state and/or less disability post-surgery. We performed a retrospective review of prospectively collected data from the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) Database from the time of its inception. Inclusion criteria specified all elective cervical surgery patients over 18 years old with degenerative pathology who proceeded to surgery and completed the pre- and post-operative outcomes measures up to 24 months post surgery (n=460). Outcome measures were visual analog scales (VAS) for neck and arm pain, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and EuroQOL score at baseline and 3, 12 and 24 months post-op. Exercise frequency was self-reported as “none” (n=212) versus “some” (n=248). These groups were further categorized into “none due to physical limitations”, “none” (not due to physical limitations), those to exercised “once or less per week” and those that exercised “twice or more per week”. Student's t-tests were used to compare the mean scores of the outcome measures, and analysis of variance for subgroup comparisons, with results considered significant at p < 0 .05. At baseline, 56% of total patients reported exercise prior to surgery, of which 73% reported doing so twice or more per week. Of the 44% reporting no exercise, 74% could not exercise due to physical limitations. Those who reported “some” exercise had more favorable VAS neck and arm pain scores pre-operatively (neck: 5.55 vs 6.11, p < 0 .001) (arm: 5.69 vs 6.04, p=0.011), but no difference at 3 and 24 months post-operatively. Significantly lower NDI scores and higher EuroQOL Index scores were seen in the exercise group compared to the no exercise group pre-operatively (NDI: 39 vs 48, p < 0 .001) (EuroQOL: 0.60 vs 0.50 p < 0 .001) as well as at 3, 12, and 24 months post-op (NDI: 24 vs 31, p=0.007) (EuroQOL: 0.75 vs 0.68, p=0.001). Further subgroup analysis demonstrated that compared to the “no exercise due to physical limitation” group, the “twice or more” exercise group showed favorable NDI and EuroQOL scores up to 24 months post-op (NDI: 24.32 vs 32.33, p=0.001) (EuroQOL: 0.76 vs 0.66, p=0.001), whereas the “once or less times per week” group no longer demonstrated any significant difference at 24 months (NDI: 28.79 vs 32.33, p=1) (EuroQOL: 0.73 vs 0.66, p=0.269). Self-reported exercise prior to cervical spine surgery does not predict improved long-term neck and arm pain at 2 years post-op. However, self-reported exercise does demonstrate less disability and improved health state at baseline and up to 2 years post-op and this relationship is dose dependent

Purpose. Even though various factors have been associated with neck pain, skeletal muscle mechanical properties have been cited among the leading causes of neck pain. Changes in skeletal muscle stiffness may be related to chronic neck pain and these changes may be associated with the severity of pain and disability in patients with chronic neck pain. The purpose of the present study was to investigate differences in neck muscle stiffness between patients with chronic neck pain and asymptomatic control group. Another purpose of the study was to investigate the relationship of muscle stiffness with the severity of physical disability and pain in patients with chronic neck pain. Methods. A cross-sectional case-control study with 86 participants (43 patients with chronic neck pain and 43 age-matched asymptomatic controls) was designed. The present study included patients with a pain intensity level of 20 or more based on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and a total disability level of 10 or more based on the Neck Disability Index (NDI). Ultrasonic evaluation of upper trapezius, splenius capitis, and sternocleidomastoid muscle performed with the ACUSON S3000 Ultrasonography Device using Siemens 9L4 (4–9 MHz) linear-array ultrasound probe. Shear Wave Velocity (SWV) of selected muscles was obtained using customized software, Virtual Touch Imaging and Quantification® (Siemens Medical Solution, Mountain View, CA, USA). Results. SWV of splenius capitis was similar in both groups (p=0.979); however, SWV of upper trapezius (p<0.001) and sternocleidomastoid (p=0.003) of the patients with chronic neck pain were higher compared to the asymptomatic controls groups. NRS score did not correlate with SWV of upper trapezius (r=−0.27, p=0.085), sternocleidomastoid (r=−0.02, p=0.879) and splenius capitis (r=0.01, p= 0.990). Similarly, NDI score did not correlate with SWV of upper trapezius (r=−0,09 p=0.567), sternocleidomastoid (r=0.15, p=0.345) and splenius capitis (r=0.18, p= 0.274). Conclusions. SWV of splenius capitis muscle stiffness was found similar in both groups, but SWV of upper trapezius and sternocleidomastoid muscle were found increased in patients with neck pain compared to asymptomatic controls groups. In addition, severity of pain and disability did not relate to stiffness of these muscles in patient with chronic neck pain

Cervical total disc replacement has been in practice for years now as a viable alternative to cervical fusion in suitable cases, aspiring to preserve spinal motion and prevent adjacent segment disease. Reports are rife that neck pain emerges as an annoying feature in the early postoperative period. The facet joint appears to be the most likely source of pain. 50 patients were prospectively followed up through 5 years after having received disc replacement surgery, indicated for symptomatic soft disc herniation of the cervical spine presenting with radiculopathy. • All were skeletally mature and aged between 22 to 50. • All had failed a minimum of 6 months conservative therapy. • Up to 2 disc levels were addressed. C3 till C7 levels. • Single surgeon (first author). • NDI > 30% (15/50). • Deteriorating radicular neurology. We excluded those with degenerative trophic changes of the cervical spine, focal instability, trauma, osteoporosis, previous cervical spine surgery, previous infection, ossifying axial skeletal disease and inflammatory spondyloarthritides. The device used was an unconstrained implant with stabilizing teeth. Over the 5 years, we studied their postoperative comfort level via the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Visual Analogue Score (VAS). Pre-operative and post-operative analysis of the sagittal axis and of involved facet joints were done. 22 patients suffered postoperative neck pain as reflected by the NDI and VAS scores. Of these, 10 reported of neck pain even 24 months after surgery. However, none were neurologically worse and all patients returned to their pre-morbid functions and were relieved of pain by 28 months. All 22 patients reported of rapid dissolution of neckache after peri-facetal injections of steroids were done under image guidance. We draw attention to the facet joint as the pain generator, triggered by inappropriate implant height, eccentric stresses via hybrid constructs, eccentric loading due to unconstrained devices and unaddressed Luschka joint degeneration. Such factors require careful selection of patients for surgery, necessitate proper pre-operative templating and call for appropriate technical solutions during surgery

The study was designed to observe the patients emotional and physical response to total disc replacement surgery in the cervical spine. A prospective cohort study of patients undergoing Cervical total disc replacement (TDR) surgery at our institution. Surgery was carried for radicular and or axial neck pain. The Activ-C TDR (Aesculap) was used. Pre and post operative data was collected using validated questionnaires. 13 Consecutive patients from Nov 2007 to Aug 2008 were studied. All patients were planned for surgical intervention for symptomatic degenerative cervical disc disease at single or multiple levels. 7 male, 6 female. The Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) was used to assess the psychological impact. The Neck Disability Index (NDI) and a visual analogue scale (VAS) were used to assess the physical impact of the surgery. NDI shows a significant improvement at 6 and 12 months (p= 0.002 and p=0.02 respectively). The VAS also shows significant improvement at 6 and 12 months (p=0.004 and 0.008 respectively) The CES-D improved but failed to show any significant improvement at either interval. In our patient population surgical intervention with TDR for degenerative disc disease offers significant physical benefit over the short term. This does not correlate with an improvement in their emotional state

Background. The factors that are considered to be associated with successful clinical outcome fallowing cervical arthroplasty surgery are patient selection, absence of facet joint changes and lack of pre-operative kyphosis. Even though many studies have cited the pre-operative demographic details of their patient groups, the effect of associated psychological co-morbidities (Depression/Anxiety), smoking history, gender, social benefits and employment status on the clinical outcome measures have not been reported. The aim of the study was to assess the influence of pre-operative patient characteristics on the clinical outcomes following cervical disc replacement. Methods. We included 126 patients who underwent single or multiple level cervical arthroplasty in our unit were included in the study. The clinical outcome measures such as Visual Analogue Score for neck pain (VAS-NP) and arm pain (VAS-AP); Neck disability Index (NDI), Hospital depression and anxiety scale and Bodily pain component of Short Form 36 questionnaires (SF-36 P) were recorded pre and post operatively. Statistical analysis was completed using SPSS 16.0 statistical package (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). Results. There were 60 males and 63 females. Average duration of follow up was 18 months (Range 10–51). Out of 123 patients, 37 patients had a history of anxiety/depression, 25 patients gave history of smoking, 64 were actively working at the time of operation and 27 were receiving social benefits. We have found that gender; smoking status, associated co-morbidities, working and benefit status had no statistically significant contribution to clinical outcome measures in the follow up period. Conclusion. This is has been a first ever attempt to analyse the affect these psychosocial factors on the clinical outcomes following cervical arthroplasty. In our study, contrary to studies related lumbar surgeries, we conclude that there is no statistically significant contribution of associated psychosocial factors on the clinical outcomes in the early follow up period

Introduction. In the last decade, single level cervical arthroplasty has proven its efficacy as one of the surgical treatment option for for patients suffering from cervical degenerative disc disease. Recent published reports on multilevel cervical arthroplasty using single implants have shown statistically significant results when compared to single level surgery. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of multilevel cervical arthroplasty to single level cervical arthroplasty, when more than one type of implants were used. Methods. This is a prospective study of consecutive patients who presented to our unit in between June 2006 and November 2009. The maximum follow-up period was 51 months (mean=18 months). Several types of cervical arthroplasty devices have been used in this study. The clinical outcome measures such as Visual Analogue Score for neck pain (VAS-NP) and arm pain (VAS-AP); Neck disability Index (NDI) and the Bodily pain component of Short Form 36 questionnaires were recorded pre and post operatively. After confirming the normality of the data appropriate parametric (paired t-test) were used to assess the statistical significance (p< 0.05) between pre and post-operative values. Two sample T-test was used to assess the significance between the differences in mean scores between each group. Results. A total of 105 patients (37 single level, 68 multi-level) were included in the study. Mean age of patients was 51 years (Range 32–80) with Male: Female ratio of 9:10. All clinical outcome measures showed statistically significant improvement in the post-operative period in single as well as multilevel group. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the improvement in between single and multilevel surgeries. Conclusions. Our study results clearly demonstrate that multilevel cervical arthroplasty offers the similar clinical outcome when compared to single level surgery, despite using different type of implant in multilevel surgeries

Introduction. This study aims to evaluate the impact of associated psychological co-morbidities (Depression/Anxiety), smoking history, gender, work benefits and employment status on the clinical outcome following anterior cervical disc replacement (ACDR). Materials and Methods. We included in our study 100 patients who underwent ACDR in our Spinal Unit (between May 2006 – May 2010). We used as clinical outcome measures: Visual Analogue Score for neck pain (VAS-NP) and arm pain (VAS-AP), Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Bodily Pain (SF36-BP) component of the Short Form 36 questionnaire. Statistics were obtained using SPSS 16.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). Independent sample t-test for normally distributed data and Man-Whitney U test for non-parametric data were used. Statistical significance was designated at p < 0.05. Results. There were 48 males and 52 females. Average age at operation was 52.96 years (Range 38-80) for males and 49.79 years (Range 31-71) for females. Average duration of follow up was 14.4 months (Range 6-35). Out of 100 patients, 28 patients had a history of anxiety/depression, 19 patients were smokers, 47 were actively working and 23 were receiving work benefits. We found that gender, smoking status, associated co-morbidities, working and benefit status had no statistically significant contribution to clinical outcome measures in the follow up period. For example, in the sub-group of non-smokers versus smokers, there was no significant difference in NDI (p=0.78), VAS-AP (p=0.12), SF-BP (p= 0.83) and VAS-NP (p=0.08). Conclusion. We conclude that in our study there was no statistically significant contribution of the associated psychosocial factors on the clinical outcomes following ACDR

To assess the clinical and radiological outcome of single and multiple level Anterior Cervical Disc Replacement (ACDR) using Peek-on-peek system. We present the largest series of POPCDR at a single centre. Thirty-one patients with radiculopathy and/or myelopathy caused by disc generation who did not respond to conservative treatments were included. Pain and function were evaluated by VAS (Visual Analogue Score) for neck (VAS-NP) and arm pain (VAS-AP). Neck disability index (NDI) and SF-36 questionnaires were completed. Disc height and segmental angular correction (SAC) were measured on radiographs pre- and postoperatively. Seven patients had one-level, fifteen had two-level, seven had three-level and two had four-level ACDR. Sixty-six discs were replaced. Average follow-up was six months. Mean VAS-NP improved from 7.27 to 3.93 and VAS-AP from 7.27 to 3.4. Mean SF-36 improved from 32.21 to 40.22. There was functional improvement for NDI in all patients. There was an improvement in SAC from 5.4. ° . to 8.0. ° . for one-level, 3.1. °. to 7.5. °. for two level, 8.4. °. to 9.4. °. for three-level and 5.8. °. to 26.7. °. for four-level ACDR. Post-operative anterior disc height increased by 152% for lower and 55% for higher levels. Similar improvements were noted for posterior disc heights. Early results show that POPCDR is safe and effective for treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease. The clinical and radiological outcomes are similar to other types of ACDR reported in literature. POPCDR also allows safe use of MRI during follow-up with fewer artifacts giving it an edge over other systems

Introduction: In comparison to anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF), cervical disc arthroplasty has the potential of maintaining normal segmental lordosis, anatomical disc space height, and physiological motion patterns that may reduce or delay the onset of degenerative disc disease at adjacent cervical spinal motion segments. Aim: The objective of this study was to determine patient satisfaction post cervical disc arthroplasty. by evaluating each patient both clinically and radiologically. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was performed on all patients with symptomatic cervical radiculopathy and/or myelopathy who had undergone cervical disc arthroplasty by a single surgeon after a standard anterior cervical discectomy. Outcome measures included the Short Form-36 (SF-36) and Neck Disability Index (NDI) questionnaires, neurological status, and radiographic status. Results: Over a 32 month period, 15 patients underwent cervical disc arthroplasty, with 12 patients undergoing single level arthroplasty. 2 patients undergoing 2 level arthroplasty and one patient undergoing a 3 level arthroplasty. The C5/C6 level was involved in 9 cases (60%). The male female ratio was 7:8. The mean age at presentation was 45 years (range, 28–59). The mean follow up was 24 months (range, 5–31). The mean improvement in NDI scores was 34.8. The mean PCS and MCS scores of the SF-36 test improved by 12.8 and 7.7 respectively. There was no neurological deficit. There were no cases of implant failures, migrations or subsidence. Conclusion: High patient satisfaction levels highlight the efficacy and safety of cervical disc arthroplasty, but longer term follow up is required to assess the long term functionality of the prosthesis and its protective influence on adjacent levels

We describe results of a new ‘two needle technique’ of selective nerve root blocks done through posterior triangle of neck in the management of cervical radiculopathy with 2 year results. Methods: Patients presenting with cervical radiculopathy were evaluated clinically and radiologically and were initially managed with supervised physiotherapy, analgesics and rest. Selective cervical nerve root block was offered to the patients, who did not respond to conservative management. The procedure was performed as a day case, under local anesthesia, with image intensifier guidance, using ‘two needle technique’. A thinner needle is rail-roaded through the lumen of large diameter guide needle to reach the target nerve root foramen and a mixture of Bupivacaine and Triamcinolone acetonide is injected. The outcome was measured using visual analogue score (VAS) and neck disability index (NDI) done on the day of the procedure and compared to the scores at 3 months and 1 year after the procedure. Results: Outcome in 30 patients who underwent this procedure over three years’ period is presented. Average Visual Analogue Score was 7.36 (range 6 – 10) before the intervention, which improved to 2.27 (range 0 – 7) at 3 months and 1.9 (range 0 – 4) at 1 year. The average Neck Disability Index score prior to intervention was 66.87 (range 44 to 82), which improved to 31.67 (range 18 – 66) at 3 months and 30.44 (range 20 – 48) at 1 year. There were no major complications noted. We conclude that selective cervical nerve root block using ‘two-needle technique’ is safe and reproducible. The therapeutic effect achieved is long lasting, making this procedure a good alternative to surgical management in patients with cervical radiculopathy who do not respond to conservative management

In the 40 years since Smith and Robinson described the anterior approach to decompress and fuse the cervical spine, generally acceptable clinical results have been reported though few papers include any form of detailed outcome assessment. More recently Snyder and Bernhardt have described an anterolateral disc-preserving approach to treat cervical radiculopathy that does not entail vertebral artery exposure. We describe our experience of this procedure. Surgery was performed on 40 patients ( 21 male, 19 female, mean age 41 years). Functional outcome was assessed by the Neck Disability Index (NDI), return to usual work status, patient subjective satisfaction rating, and by standard VAS. Radiographic evaluation was performed looking at the following parameters: neutral films – maintenance of interbody disc height/diameter ratio R and degree of kyphosis/lordosis: dynamic films – degree of movement maintained at operated motion segment. At an average follow up of 20 months(range 6 – 36) the mean NDI had fallen from 45% to 10% .Mean neck pain score was 2 (pre op was 7), average arm pain score 1 (pre op was7). 93% of patients had returned to work, 85% to their original occupation at an average of 11 weeks. Patient satisfaction scores were: 85% very satisfied, 5 % satisfied, 5% unsatisfied and 5% very unsatisfied. Radiologically it was possible to preserve intervertebral body disc height and motion in some patients whilst others lost some height and motion. A minority fused spontaneously. ACFID is associated with clinical functional outcome scores comparable with those reported in the literature for alternative procedures. Bone graft donor site morbidity is avoided and radiological results show that preservation of useful motion at the operated disc is possible

Background. We present the results of a single centre, prospective study to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of anterior cervical decompression and replacement (ACDR) using the NuNec(tm) Cervical Arthroplasty System (Pioneer Surgical Technology, Marquette, Mich., USA). Methodology and Results. 36 patients with radiculopathy/myelopathy, who failed to respond to conservative measures, were included. Pain and function were evaluated by Visual Analogue score for Neck pain (VAS-NP) and Arm pain (VAS-AP), Neck disability index (NDI) and SF-36 questionnaires. Radiological assessments include assessing overall range of movement (ROM) and at functional segment unit (FSU). Statistical analysis was completed using SPSS 16.0 statistical package (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). Appropriate parametric (A paired t-test) and non parametric tests (Wilcoxon signed-rank test) were used to assess the statistical significance (p<0.05). The average age at operation was 51 years (range 35 - 77years). 8 patients received ACDR at one-level, 15 had 2-level surgery, 12 had 3-level surgery and 1 had a 4-level surgery. At the time of final follow-up (Mean 14.25 months, Range 12- 22.5 months) the mean NDI improved from 49.35; to 33.78 (p< 0.001). There statistically significant improvement note in VAS-NP (Post-op3.65, Pre-op:8.16, p<0.001), VAS-AP (Post-op:3.12, Pre-op:7.32, p<0.001) and SF-36BP (pre-op:29.15, post-op:37.18, p<0.002). The overall global ROM movement was preserved (pre-op:46.80±10.52, post-op:45.04±11.53) and an improvement in ROM at FSU was observed (pre-op:16.60±8.50, post-op:20.22±12.22) at final follow–up. Conclusion. Our results of ACDR using the NuNec(tm) disc show statistically significant improvement in the outcome measures that are comparable to other types of ACDR. In addition, preservation of global cervical spine ROM and improvement in FSU ROM was observed despite single or multiple levels ACDR. Furthermore, NuNec(tm) ACDR gives excellent quality MR image during post-operative period. In our preliminary results, we report that NuNec(tm) ACDR device is safe, effective and has added design benefits

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for radiculopathy and myelopathy has the complication of the development of adjacent segment degeneration. Furthermore, reoperations may be required to treat complications of fusion, such as non-union, graft collapse, or expulsion. Cervical disc arthroplasty lays claim to preserving cervical motion and reducing the risks of adjacent segment disease in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy. We performed a prospective study in order to evaluate the radiological and clinical outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty for single or two level disc disease with associated radiculopathy. Our study included a total of 26 patients. Each patient had cervical radiculopathy from nerve root compression due to degenerative disc disease at one or two levels. Diagnosis was made preoperatively on clinical examination and by means of MRI scanning. Each patient also had preoperative flexion and extension cervical spine x-rays in order to assess pre-operative range of neck movement. The outcomes of surgery were assessed prospectively. Range of motion at final follow-up was measured by flexion and extension view x-rays of the cervical spine. Clinical outcome was assessed by means of VAS scores for pain, SF12 for mental and physical health and the neck disability index (NDI). All complications were recorded. 14 of the patients had a follow-up for two years and the remaining 12 patients had a follow-up for one year. A Discovery disc arthoplasty by Scient'X was the implant used in all patients. A standard anterior cervical approach was used to achieve decompression and for the implantation of the prosthesis. On follow-up all patients had either maintenance or an improvement in the range of movement. There was no evidence of progression of degeneration in the segments adjacent to the arthroplasty prosthesis. Improvements in SF12, VAS, and NDI scores were seen from preoperative levels in 25 of the 26 patients. Complications included one patient with a horse voice post-operatively and one patient with minimal improvement of radicular symptoms. Post-operative MRI scanning demonstrated adequate decompression with this procedure and showed no evidence of progression of adjacent segment disease. There were no cases of implant subsidence or dislocations. We have found cervical disc arthroplasty to produce good clinical outcomes when used for single or two level cervical radiculopathy whilst maintaining neck motion with an acceptable complication rate. A longer follow-up is needed to further assess the risk of development of adjacent segment disease but we did not discover the development of adjacent segment disease in our study with a follow-up of upto 2 years

Purpose of the study. To compare safety and efficacy of cervical disc replacement (CRD) in single and multilevel DDD. Patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. Methods. 249 patients were enrolled. 171 patients were treated at 1-level, 41 treated at 2 levels and 2 patients were treated at 3 levels. Implant was also used adjacent to a fusion with a cage in 35 patients. The diagnosis was cervical degenerative disc disease between C3 and C7 with symptomatic DH. Population was 106 male 143 female, average age 46 (25-71). Clinical assessment included VAS scores for arm and neck pain and Neck Disability Index (NDI). Range of motion (ROM) from flexion/extension lateral view were measured. Results. Of all NDI scores recorded, 86,50 % demonstrated at least 15 points improvement at two years follow up from pre-op scores. 85,1% of VAS arm Pain scores demonstrated an improvement by = 2 points from pre-op scores and 50,8% for VAS neck Pain scores. The breakdown by levels and adjacent to an interbody cage shown that 80% of reported NDI scores demonstrated at least a 15 point improvement post operatively for two level disc replacement. 82,4% demonstrated a greater than 2 points improvement in VAS arm pain and 53,3% for VAS neck pain. For patients that received both implant and an interbody cage, 72,7% demonstrated a greater than 2 point improvement in VAS arm pain and 41,7% for VAS neck pain. Three (1,8%) cases of subsidence and 4 cases of implant loosening/displacement due to inappropriate sizing were reported. Available radiographic findings show on average a ROM of 8,2 ° at 2 years and an overall change in cervical lordosis of 5° from pre-op. Conclusion. Clinical outcomes demonstrated a significant improvement for both the total population (n=249) and for the single level total disc replacement population (n=171). Given these outstanding results single and multilevel TDR with this implant can be considered to be safe. No significant difference was observed between single and multilevel TDR groups regarding clinical, functional and radiological results. Follow up for this series need however to be extended for up to 5 years at least. The role of this implant in multilevel cases as well as in cases to a fused level still need further evaluation although these preliminary results are encouraging

Introduction: Formulation of surgical protocol in CSM is marred by the diversity in clinico-radiological presentation. Prospective data that assigns a specific surgery with identifiable similarities in clinico-radiological attributes is sparse. Objectives:. To identify radiological patterns of compression (POC) of the spinal cord. To develop a surgical protocol based on POC and determine its efficacy. To identify parameters predicting outcome of surgery. Methods: 135 consecutive patients aged 32–75 yrs (mean 48.1yr) operated for CSM from 1999–2005 formed the study group for this prospective series. The objectives were to identify radiological patterns of compression (POC), develop a surgical algorithm based on POC and evaluate outcome. Four POC were identified on MRI. Pattern I – predominant one/two level compression in normal/narrow canal. Pattern II – anterior & posterior compression at one/ two levels (pincer cord). Pattern III – Three or more levels of predominant anterior compression with a normal canal. Pattern III(A) – Pattern III in a patient with multiple medical co-morbidities. Pattern IV – Three/more levels of anterior compression in narrow canal +/− posterior compression (beaded cord). Pattern IV(A) – Pattern IV with one/two level severe compression amongst the multiple anterior compressions. Mean follow-up was 3 yrs (2–8). ACDF was performed for patterns I, II & III and posterior decompression for pattern IV and III(A). For pattern IV(A), a two stage primary posterior decompression followed by targeted ACDF at the site of maximal compression was performed. The clinical outcome was measured by modified JOA (mJOA) score, Hirayabashi Recovery Rate (HRR) and functional outcome by modified Neck Disability Index (NDI). Results: The mean pre & post-op mJOA score was 10.40±3.33 & 15.76±1.45 respectively with average HRR of 80.10 ± 26.38. The difference in the mJOA scores was statistically significant (unpaired t test) for each POC. In multilevel CSM, anterior surgery in POC type III had statistically better post op mJOA as compared to those who underwent posterior surgery viz POC types IV and III & IV variants although the difference in their HRR and NDI were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Anterior surgery has better neurological outcome in judiciously selected patients with multilevel CSM. Surgical decision-making guided by patterns of compression (POC) is pivotal for optimal functional outcome

Introduction: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the gold standard for imaging muscle and fatty infiltrate has featured in low back pain. However, there is little knowledge about in vivo features of neck muscles in chronic WAD. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively compare fatty infiltrate in the cervical extensors in patients with chronic WAD and controls across muscle and segmental level. Methods: Volunteer subjects were gained through referral from local practitioners and the local university fraternity. A previously established MRI measure was performed in 113 female subjects (79- WAD & 34 healthy controls). Subjects with chronic WAD (> three months – < three years) were included if, classifiable as WAD II per the Quebec Task Force. The cohort was restricted to females (18–45 years) as they best represent those with chronic WAD. Volunteers were excluded when. classified as WAD I, III or IV. lost consciousness as a result of a motor vehicle crash (MVC). previous history of MVC. previous non-traumatic neck pain. diagnosed with any neurological, metabolic or inflammatory conditions or. were pregnant. The measure was performed for the rectus capitis minor/major, multifidus, semispinalis cervicis/capitis, splenius capitis and upper trapezius. The values for all muscles were plotted for level and side and linear regression analysis was used to determine segmental trends (C3-7). A multi-factorial analysis of variance (MANOVA) was applied to investigate group means of whiplash and controls for fat indices across muscle, side and level. Bonferroni post-hoc comparisons were used to compare group by muscle interactions at each level. Multiple regression analyses were performed to determine if the score on the Neck Disability Index (NDI), age, Body Mass Index (BMI), compensation status and duration influenced fatty infiltrate. Significance was set at p < 0.05. Data presented as mean ± SD. Results: The demographic characteristics of the two groups are: WAD (n = 79): age: 29.7 ± 7.8 years, BMI (kg/m2): 25.1 ± 5.7; duration: 20.3 ± 9.6 months and NDI: 45.5 ± 15.9. Healthy Controls (n = 34): Age: 27.0 ± 5.6 years, BMI: 23.0 ± 4.4.. NDI was not collected in controls. MANOVA revealed significant main effects for group, muscle, segmental level and side (p < 0.0001), and significant interactions between Group:Muscle, Group:Level, Muscle:Level and Group:side (p < 0.0001). Sides were averaged for each muscle and level for post-hoc analysis. There was a linear decrease in the fat indices from C3 – C7 for each muscle in both groups. No significant differences in fat indices across muscle, levels and side were noted in controls (p = 0.09). For the WAD subjects, the multifidus muscle had significantly higher fat content at each level compared to the other segmental muscles (p < 0.0001) and was highest at C3 (p < 0.0001). There were higher fat indices in the whiplash group compared to the controls for the rcpmin and rcpmaj muscles (p < 0.0001). No relationship was found for fat indices in all WAD muscles and NDI scores (p = 0.81), age (p = 0.14), duration (p = 0.99), compensation (p = 0.37) or BMI (p = 0.74). Discussion: There is significantly greater fatty infiltration in neck extensors, especially in the deeper muscles, in females with chronic WAD when compared with controls. Future studies are required to investigate relationships between muscular degeneration and symptoms