Renal Osteodystrophy is a type of metabolic bone disease characterized by bone mineralization deficiency due to electrolyte and endocrine abnormalities. Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are more likely to experience falls and fractures due to renal osteodystrophy and the high prevalence of risk factors for falls. Treatment involves medical management to resolve the etiology of the underlying renal condition, as well as management (and prevention) of pathological fractures. A 66-year-old female patient, with severe osteoporosis and chronic kidney disease undergoing haemodialysis, has presented with multiple fractures along the years. She was submitted to bilateral proximal femoral nailing as fracture treatment on the left and prophylactically due to pathological bone injury on the right, followed by revision of the left nail with a longer one after varus angulation and fracture distal to the nail extremity. Meanwhile, the patient suffered a pathological fracture of the radial and cubital diaphysis and was submitted to conservative treatment with cast, with consolidation of the fracture. Posteriorly, she re-fractured these bones after a fall and repeated the conservative treatment. Clinical management: There is a multidisciplinary approach to manage the chronic illness of the patient, including medical management to resolve the etiology and consequences of her chronic kidney disease, pain control, conservative or surgical fracture management and prevention of falls. The incidence of chronic renal disease is increasing and the patients with this condition live longer than previously and are more physically active. Thus, patients may experience trauma as a direct result of increased physical activity in a setting of weakened pathologic bone. Their quality of life is primarily limited by musculoskeletal problems, such as bone pain, muscle weakness, growth retardation, and skeletal deformity. A multidisciplinary approach is required to treat these patients, controlling their chronic diseases, managing fractures and preventing falls

Aims. Periprosthetic hip and knee infection remains one of the most severe complications following arthroplasty, with an incidence between 0.5% to 1%. This study compares the outcomes of revision surgery for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following hip and knee arthroplasty prior to and after implementation of a specialist PJI multidisciplinary team (MDT). Methods. Data was retrospectively analyzed from a single centre. In all, 29 consecutive joints prior to the implementation of an infection MDT in November 2016 were compared with 29 consecutive joints subsequent to the MDT conception. All individuals who underwent a debridement antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) procedure, a one-stage revision, or a two-stage revision for an acute or chronic PJI in this time period were included. The definition of successfully treated PJI was based on the Delphi international multidisciplinary consensus. Results. There were no statistically significant differences in patient demographics or comorbidities between the groups. There was also no significant difference in length of overall hospital stay (p = 0.530). The time taken for formal microbiology advice was significantly shorter in the post MDT group (p = 0.0001). There was a significant difference in failure rates between the two groups (p = 0.001), with 12 individuals (41.38%) pre-MDT requiring further revision surgery compared with one individual (6.67%) post-MDT inception. Conclusion. Our standardized multidisciplinary approach for periprosthetic knee and hip joint infection shows a significant reduction in failure rates following revision surgery. Following implementation of our MDT, our success rate in treating PJI is 96.55%, higher than what current literature suggests. We advocate the role of a specialist infection MDT in the management of patients with a PJI to allow an individualized patient-centred approach and care plan, thereby reducing postoperative complications and failure rates. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(7):509–514

Introduction. Osteomyelitis (OM) is a challenging condition to diagnose and treat. The multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach is used in managing complex diseases such as cancer and diabetes. The Hull Regional Bone Infection MDT team was established to provide coordinated care for patients suspected to have OM. This study reviews the orthoplastic treatment and outcomes of patients with non-periprosthetic OM. Materials and Methods. Retrospective review of patients presenting to the MDT team who had orthoplastic intervention with debridement and flap coverage between 1/6/2014 - 30/11/2018. We describe our MDT approach of assessment, planning for surgical intervention and antibiotic protocol. Data was obtained from electronic and paper patient records, and PACS. Results. Twenty-nine patients were identified (75.9% male). Mean age was 52.7 (23–82). Median duration of symptoms at surgery was 10 months (IQR 4.0–34.3). Cierny-Mader (CM) Host Type B. (L). (41.4%), type B. (S). (34.5%), and type B. (S+L). (17.2%). Twenty-four patients (82.8%) were CM anatomical class IV. Twenty-four patients (82.8%) had single-stage surgical treatment. Twenty-one patients received 23 free flaps. Anterolateral thigh flap (9/23) and gracilis muscle flap (7/23) were most commonly used. Tibialis anterior flap was the most commonly used local flap. Stimulan was used in 65.5%. Staphylococcus aureus was seen in 60% of patients. Mean follow-up time was 21 months (1–62). There were 2 (6.9%) OM recurrence. Both patients were CM anatomical class IV. Conclusions. Our study showed that our MDT management of patients with OM can achieve a low recurrence rate despite a high proportion of patients with severe OM. We recommend considering an MDT approach for these complex OM patients

Abstract. Multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings in orthopaedic surgery are evolving. The goals include patient optimisation, surgical planning and discharge arrangements, individually on a patient specific basis. In line with British Association Surgery of the Knee and GIRFT guidelines, we report our regional experience on the implementation and evolution of our regional Revision Knee Arthroplasty MDT. We undertook a retrospective review of the process, cases discussed and quality assurance conducted in the weekly MDT. Since implementation of the MDT meeting in January 2019, 550 patients with painful joint replacements have been discussed. In May 2021, we formalised our ‘terms of reference’ and ‘standard operating procedures’ which are adhered to by the consultants operating within the network, all of whom attend the meeting. A proforma has been developed and is completed for all cases capturing all pertinent information. All cases are graded according to R1, R2, or R3 complexity scale. Since its inception, the MDT has looked at all post-operative imaging, we now describe a new classification system for grading the appearances. Confirmation of the pre-operative plan and actual surgical intervention is reviewed and audited. In addition, confirmation of indication of revision at the time of operation is reviewed and validated for accuracy with benefits to the unit, individual surgeon and the NJR. In conclusion, the implementation of the revision MDT facilitating pre-operative revision arthroplasty discussion and post-operative quality assurance processes enable surgeons to educate, reflect on their practice and ensure that the highest standards of care are being provided

Aim. Multidisciplinary team (MDT) management of complex bone and joint infections (BJI) is increasingly implemented but studies evaluating this approach are scarce. We assessed the effectiveness of our MDT by analyzing the adherence to its treatment decisions. Method. A cohort study was conducted comprising patients with complex BJI of which the management was discussed during MDT meetings between 2015 and 2022 in a tertiary care academic hospital. Patient characteristics and MDT data were obtained from electronic patient records. Results. The analysis included 1321 MDT case decisions on 509 patients. During the study period, the number of patients discussed by the MDT increased from 2.7 to 5.5 per meeting. The percentage of discussed patients with BJI other than prosthetic joint infections (PJI) increased from 26% to 52%. The overall adherence rate to MDT decisions was 92.1%. Reasons for non-adherence were disagreement with the MDT whether cure was achieved or not (34%), new clinical information that was not available during the MDT meeting (12%), preference for suppressive antibiotic treatment over surgery (8%) or not recorded in the patient file (46%). Conclusions. Over the years, the MDT meeting content expanded from mainly PJI to all complex BJI. The high adherence rate to MDT decisions was indicative of an effective MDT. Analysis of adherence is a useful tool to evaluate an MDT and can be used to improve its quality. Different aspects of an MDT need to be evaluated to fully determine its impact and to help improve the care for patients with complex BJI

Background and Purpose. Non-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP) poses a significant disability and economic burden worldwide. Fear avoidance is suggested to contribute to its chronicity and reduced treatment effect. National guidelines recommend exercise as a component of multidisciplinary rehabilitation but its interaction with fear avoidance is ambiguous. This systematic review examined the effect of exercise-based interventions (EBIs) on fear avoidance NSCLBP. Methods and Results. RCTs comparing EBIs to usual care in adults with NSCLBP were included. A systematic search of CINAHL, Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane Library (up to January 2019) revealed 10 eligible trials. Following risk of bias assessment, 6 studies were included for data extraction and narrative synthesis. EBIs were not found superior to usual care in reducing fear avoidance at any follow-up. There was evidence that reducing fear avoidance is probably not the mechanism through which EBIs affect pain and disability. In adherent patients, EBIs did not result in greater clinically relevant improvements in pain or disability than usual care, in the short- or intermediate-term. Conclusion. Addition of EBIs as part of multidisciplinary rehabilitation is not more beneficial than that of usual care in reducing fear avoidance in NSCLBP patients. However, the findings of this review are based on heterogenous studies presenting with methodological limitations. Further high-quality research is required to examine the review's findings and investigate current physiotherapy management of fear avoidance in NSCLBP. No conflicts of interest. No funding obtained

Background. Myxofibrosarcomas are malignant soft tissue tumours that often present as painless slowly growing masses in the extremities of older males. Locally infiltrative growth means risks of local recurrence is high. Management emphasises negative surgical margins and adjuvant therapy. The aim of this retrospective case series was to review our experience of this tumour, and make recommendations about a minimum resection margin and how best to utilise the expertise of the multidisciplinary team. Methods. A computerised database identified patients with myxofibrosarcoma surgically treated in our centre between 1997 and 2011. Clinical records were reviewed. Margins were positive if tumour was at or within 1mm of the resection plane. Results. 43 patients (median age 68.6 years; 70% male) were identified. 42 underwent surgery: 26 (62%) by orthopaedics; 9 (21%) by plastics, and 7 (17%) jointly. The lower limb was the most common site (30/43, 70%). Mean tumour size was 5.9cm (range 1.5 to 20cm). 53% had grade III tumours. Of 39 tumours with available data, 21 were superficial fascially-based masses and 18 were deep. 23 (55%) had positive margins. Of these, 9 underwent re-excision, 5 of whom had adjuvant radiotherapy. 13 of the remaining 14 patients had adjuvant radiotherapy. Of the fascially-based tumours, there was microscopic spread beyond the macroscopic mass of between 3–25mm. 3 patients (7%) developed local recurrence at a mean of 25 months (14 to 30 months). 12 (29%) had metastases at a mean of 19 months (range 7 to 48 months). Conclusion. Myxofibrosarcoma poses a number of challenges for sarcoma teams; in particular, high positive margin rates, risks of further surgery and local failure. The infiltrative nature makes it suited to management by multidisciplinary teams. Microscopic tumour can present up to 2.5cm from the macroscopic mass for fascially-based tumours, and teams should plan appropriately

This paper describes an audit loop. We studied patients undergoing hip and knee surgery (arthroplasty and revision arthroplasty). All the patients were ‘complex elective’. I.e. they were either ASA grade 3 or 4, or had a body mass index in excess of 40. We collected data concerning postoperative admissions to HDU, ICU and PACU (planned and unplanned rates of admission, length of stay). We also noted mortality. In the first part of the study (April 2005 to March 2006) we studied 298 patients. All patients were assessed independently by an anaesthetist on the day of surgery. A multidisciplinary preoperative assessment clinic commenced in April 2006. After this date all patients were assessed preoperatively by a multidisciplinary anaesthetic lead team (anaesthetist, orthopaedic senior house officer, nurse practitioner). The need for an HDU or ICU bed was assessed and the bed was booked at part of the pre-operative plan. In the second part of the study (May 2006 to April 2009) a further 1147 arthroplasty patients were studied. Data was again collected regarding HDU, ICU, PACU and mortality as noted above. We found statistically significant (p=0.001) reductions in the admissions to PACU (22% down to 10%) and in mortality (6.1% down to 1.2%) after the introduction of the pre assessment clinic. There was also statistically significant (p=0.01) reduction in the HDU length of stay(2.1 days to 1.6 days), ITU unplanned admissions (1.3% to 0.4%) and the ITU length of stay in days (2.3 to 1.9 days). We also estimated cost savings of nearly £50 000 in the second limb of the study. This is based on the average decrease in HDU and ICU length of stay. We recommend the use of a multidisciplinary pre assessment clinic for complex orthopaedic surgery

Objectives. Aged trauma patients are at high risk for various comorbidities and loss of function following hip fracture. Consequently a multidisciplinary approach for the treatment of these patients has become more famous in order to maintain the patients” activity level and health status prior to trauma. This study evaluates the effect of a multidisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation on the short- and long-term functional status of geriatric patients following hip fracture surgery. Methods. A collective of 158 hip fracture patients (> 80 years) who underwent surgery were included in this study. An initial Barthel Index lower than 30 points was a criteria to exclude patients from this study. Two subgroups, depending on the availability of treatment spots at the rehabilitation center were made. No other item was used to discriminated between the groups. Group A (n=95) stayed an average of 21 days at an inpatient rehabilitation center specialized in geriatric patients. Group B (n=63) underwent the standard postoperative treatment. As main outcome parameter we used the Barthel Index, which was evaluated for every patient on the day of discharge and checkups after three, six and twelve months. Results. After three months, the average Barthel Index was 82,27 points for group A and 74,68 points for group B (p=0,015). In the six-months-checkup group A”s average Barthel Index was 84,05 points and group B”s was 74,76 points (p=0,004). After twelve months, patients from group A had an average Barthel Index of 81,05 while patients from group B had an average Barthel Index of 71,51 (p=0,010). Conclusion. This study reveals a significant better outcome in both, the short-term and the long-term functional status for geriatric hip-fracture patients, who underwent an inpatient treatment in a rehabilitation center following the initial surgical therapy. This is shown at the timepoints three, six and twelve month after discharge. To maintain quality of life and mobility as well as the patient”s independence in daily life, a treatment in a rehabilitation center specialized in geriatric patients is highly recommendable

Purpose of the study and background. An integrated rehabilitation programme was developed and found feasible taking into account the existing evidence base, appropriate theories, and patient and public involvement. The integrated programme encompasses inpatient activities supported by a multidisciplinary team, and integration of knowledge, skills and behaviours in the patient's everyday life. The aim of this trial was to compare the effectiveness of an integrated rehabilitation programme with an existing rehabilitation programme in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Methods and Results. Comparison of two parallel rehabilitation programmes in a randomised controlled trial including 165 patients with CLBP. The integrated rehabilitation programme comprised an alternation of in total three weeks of inpatient stay and in total 11 weeks of home-based activities. The existing rehabilitation programme comprised a four-week inpatient stay. Primary outcome was changes in disability (Oswestry Disability Index). Secondary outcomes were changes in pain, pain self-efficacy, health related quality of life and depression. Outcomes were collected at baseline and 26-week follow-up. Disability decreased −5.76 (95%CI; −8.31, −3.20) for the integrated programme and −5.64 (95%CI; −8.45, −2.83) for the existing programme. The adjusted difference between the two programmes was −0.28 (95%CI; −4.02, 3.45). No statistically significant difference was found in any of the secondary outcomes. Conclusion. The results of the trial were consistent, showing no significant differences in patients' outcomes when comparing an integrated rehabilitation programme with an existing programme. Conflicts of interest: None. Sources of funding: Aarhus University, The Danish Rheumatism Association and Familien Hede Nielsens Fond

Purpose. In 2010, the new clinical guideline of Osteoporosis Canada for the diagnosis of osteoporosis, clearly indicates that patients with high-risk of fracture are those that have already sustained a fracture (osteoporotic fracture). Until now, only 12% of the 3,400 fractures that we treat each year receive a treatment for osteoporosis. We are validating an evaluation protocol and a multidisciplinary systematic follow-up approach for osteoporosis. Patients are managed by a clinical nurse specialist. We are recruiting 543 patients with an osteoporotic fracture at Hal du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal. We aim to evaluate: 1) the incidence of a second osteoporotic fracture, 2) the initiation of a treatment and determine the compliance and adherence to treatment and 3) the evaluation of CTX-1 and Osteocalcin at Baseline, 6, 12,18 et 24 months (treatment efficacy) and 4) the functional outcome and quality of life post-fracture. Method. We've enrolled 153 subjects (men and women) over 40 years of age who were treated for an osteoporotic fracture at the orthopaedic clinic of Hal du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal. After starting a treatment protocol for osteoporosis, the subjects will be followed for a 24 months period at different time intervals. During these visits, they fill up functional outcome questionnaires, undergo physical exam, blood test, x rays and their compliance to treatment is evaluated. Results. Mean patients age was 65 y.o (+ 13). Two hundred seventeen patients were approached and 153 patients were enrolled (23 men and 130 women). Eleven patients refused to be part of the systematic follow up because they were satisfied with their family doctors osteoporosis management. Fifty-three were explained treatment and follow up and refused to participate. Thirteen patients (9%) dropped out after six months. One patient died. Twenty-one patients (13.7%) were already on bisphosphonates and 53 pts (34.6 %) had already sustained a fragility fracture. All patients were prescribed risedronate except three that were prescribed zoledronic acid or pamidronate for intolerance or contraindication to oral bisphosphonates. Up to now, we obtained 71% adherence and 91% persistence. After validation, 10% of the patients needed to be referred to a rheumatologist and 90% of the patients were managed by the clinical nurse specialist. Conclusion. Our multidisciplinary systematic follow up of osteoporotic fracture improved the osteoporosis treatment rate from 12 to 71 % in our orthopaedic surgery department. Clinical Nurse Specialists could represent the best approach to manage the underlying osteoporosis that leads to fragility fractures

Introduction: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumors. A multidisciplinary approach including surgery, chemotherapy and radiation therapy is recommended. Materials and Methods: In the last 12 years, 249 patients with STS were teated in our Institution. All of them were treted with a multidisciplinary approach using all or some of the previous refered treatments. Results: The overall local recurrence rate in the group of patients submited to surgery was 25% and this factor was related mostly with contaminated margins. Surgical resections were associted with soft tissue reconstructions when needed. Radiation therapy was used in both regimens pre and post operativly, chemotherapy was also used in 85% of the patients, and was not dependent of tumor histotype. 23 patients were submited to surgery of lung metastasis. Survival rates were determined and compared with stage (AJCC), tumor histotype and surgical margins. Conclusions: Multidisciplinary approach is the recommended treatment for STS

The Instructional Lecture will emphasise the advantages of multidisciplinary management for musculoskeletal tumours, which have produced marked improvement in survival rates in the past 10–15 years. The roles and contributions of individual team members in relation to the overall coordinated approach, which can be provided from a single Specialist Centre, or as a managed Clinical Network. Clinical examples will be used to illustrate the advantages of this approach to the clinical management of these uncommon and challenging conditions. These will include aggressive benign giant cell tumour, malignant osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma with pathological fracture, and a malignant fibrous histiocytoma of soft tissue

Identifying the core competencies of musculoskeletal medicine has been the basis for the development of the Australian Musculoskeletal Education Competencies (AMSEC) project. AMSEC aims to ensure Australian health professionals are suitably equipped through improved and appropriate education to address the increasing burden of both acute and chronic musculoskeletal disease. The AMSEC project has consisted of four distinct phases. The first two phases were consultative and highlighted concerns from medical educators, specialists and students that current curricula inadequately address the increasing scientific information base in MSK medicine and management. In phase three, Multidisciplinary Working Groups were established to detail competencies in MSK areas such as physical examination, red flag emergencies, basic and clinical science, patient education and self-management, procedural skills and rehabilitation and a web portal was developed. Phase four will see the core competencies completed, endorsed by the relevant professional colleges and integrated into Australian Medical School curricula. By bringing together experts from different groups involved in musculoskeletal education, it has been possible to agree on the core competencies required of a graduating medical student and from these determine the required underlying basic knowledge, skills and attitudes. These competencies are based on actual needs determined from current disease impact studies and the experience of professionals working in the various areas of musculoskeletal related clinical practice. This multidisciplinary and multi-professional approach, which includes consumer groups, has allowed a broader and more complete perspective of requirements. Both improved horizontal and vertical integration are facilitated and more efficient implementation is possible. By linking these core competencies to specific anatomy and basic science knowledge requirements, justification of the need to address current deficits in these areas was achieved. A standardised evidenced based approach to physical examination was developed allowing a unified approach to the resourcing and teaching of this skill by orthopaedic surgeons, rheumatologists and others. The ability to outline competency requirements vertically from medical student to resident, general practitioner and specialist is greatly facilitated by combining specialist educators with those of the universities and general practitioners. For the specialists, this approach yields excellent education leverage for very little additional effort. AMSEC has undertaken significant inter and intra disciplinary consultations to identify and classify core MSK competencies at a basic, median and advanced level of specialisation across professions. This novel national integrated model to address education needs offers many benefits and could be translated into other areas of medicine

To assess the referral system and the clinical notes and radiographs of patients presenting with metastatic disease of long bones. All oncology consultants and registrars received a questionnaire regarding referral to the orthopaedic department for metastatic disease of the appendicular skeleton. Ninety three percent of oncologists did not use a reliable scoring system to assess risk of pathological fracture. The majority of oncologists referred with regards to degree of cortical erosion and increased pain on weight-bearing. Sixty percent felt an improvement in communication between the departments was required. The notes and radiographs were reviewed of twentyfive patients presenting with femoral metastatic lesions to the oncology department. Mirels scoring system was then applied to each patient to assess the risk of the possibility of a pathological fracture. Ten patients had a Mirels score of greater than eight. Three patients were referred for an Orthopaedic opinion regarding prophylactic fixation. Two patients had no fracture of the femur after three months. Five patients had a pathological fracture within three months, resulting in an emergency admission for surgery. Three patients had a Mirels score of 8. One patient suffered a pathological fracture. Twelve patients had a Mirels score of less than 8. None of these patients were referred for an Orthopaedic opinion. None of these patients had a pathological fracture within three months. In conclusion, we presently do not offer a multidisciplinary approach to metastatic disease affecting the appendicular skeleton. The majority of patients’ who score eight or above in the Mirels scoring system are at risk of fracture and do require prophylactic surgery. In keeping with the BOA guidelines, “Metastatic Bone Disease: A Guide to Good Practice”, we would recommend the introduction of a multidisciplinary approach and the use of a recognised scoring system to improve patient care

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is the most common paediatric hip condition and is a major cause of hip replacement or osteoarthritis in young adults. Due to potential impact on quality of life, every child is checked at birth for unstable hips. Should instability be detected, or the infant has other DDH risk factors, they are referred for an ultrasound exam and orthopaedic surgeon consultation.

Since the implementation of a DDH screening program at our institution, the Radiology Department has seen a dramatic increase in hip ultrasounds performed. While helping prevent the complications of missed DDH diagnoses, this program has placed strain on radiology resources, and often families must attend multiple appointments before receiving a diagnosis and beginning treatment. To mitigate this, we have implemented a pilot point-of-care DDH clinic, where an ultrasound technician performs hip ultrasound exams using a portable ultrasound in the orthopaedic clinic in conjunction with surgeon consultation. The aim of this clinic is to enable diagnosis and treatment in one appointment, reduce referral-to-treatment delays, wait times, and decrease costs and travel time for families while also alleviating strain on radiology resources.

A point-of-care DDH test clinic was implemented in the Orthopaedic Department at our institution. Patients referred with suspected/confirmed DDH attended a single orthopaedic clinic appointment. An ultrasound technician was present to perform scans in conjunction with the orthopaedic surgeon's clinical assessment. Surveys were distributed at the end of the appointment to collect feedback on the family's satisfaction with the program, as well as other pertinent demographic information (i.e. occupation, geographic location, travel time to hospital).

To date, 40 patients have attended the pilot clinic. Families spent an average 61.3 minutes (range 15–420 minutes) traveling to the hospital for an appointment (122.6 minutes round-trip). This program reduced the number of hospital visits for DDH screening from three (initial consultation, radiology, follow-up) to one per patient, saving an average 245.2 minutes of travel time to/from the hospital per family. Appointment time averaged 35.9 minutes and families rated their satisfaction with appointment length an average of 9.6/10 (35/40 families rated satisfaction 10/10, 1 = very unsatisfied, 10 = very satisfied). Additionally, 33/40 families were also asked to rate their satisfaction with check-in/check-out processes (average 9.4/10), ultrasound screening (average 9.9/10), and time with specialist (average 9.9/10). Satisfaction scores did not differ based on variables such as survey taker's gender, occupation, or geographic location.

The pilot point-of-care ultrasound DDH clinic has considerably reduced the number of clinic visits and travel time for families, reduced aggregate clinic wait times, and has resulted in high family satisfaction. This specialized clinic may have potential to free up hospital staff time and resources, possibly decreasing wait times in other clinical areas, ultimately improving quality of care for patients and families across our institution.

While the phenomena of bone adaption to mechanical loading has been long observed, the mechanisms governing bone mechanotransduction during health and disease are not well understood. Our multidisciplinary experimental and computational research strives to enhance understanding of bone mechanobiology, and in particular how this process is affected at the onset of osteoporosis. We have provided an enhanced understanding of bone cell mechanosensation. We have characterised the local mechanical environment of MSCs, osteoblasts and osteocytes in vivo. Most importantly, we have discovered that the matrix composition, expression of mechanosensors and the mechanical environment of osteocytes is altered during osteoporosis. Interestingly, a mechanobiological response restores the homeostatic mechanical environment of the cells in the longer term. Our recent in vitro studies have revealed that estrogen withdrawal from bone cells alters calcium signalling, mineralisation, biochemical responses and osteogenic gene expression when these cells are exposed to an applied fluid shear stress. Our ongoing research is investigating mechanobiology-based therapeutic approaches for treatment of bone pathologies, by (1) targeting mechanoregulatory signalling pathways and (2) developing in vitro tissue regeneration strategies that seek to optimise the mechanical environment (through matrix stiffness, bioreactors) to stimulate osteogenesis

Aim

This retrospective case series reports the reoperation, major amputation, survival rates and mobility status in diabetic patients who underwent a trans-metatarsal amputation (TMA) managed within a multi-disciplinary diabetic foot care service.

Purpose of the study: To determine the results three to four years after a multidisciplinary programme for people with long-standing absenteeism due to chronic back pain, a longitudinal prospective cohort study was carried out. Method: A population of 143 consecutive clients who participated in 1996 in a “back to work” programme in the Rug Advies Centra, the Netherlands, was interviewed early in 2000 by telephone and using written questionnaires relating to the current work status, pain intensity, perceived disability and symptoms. The same questionnaires had been administered at the start of the programme and six months later. Differences across the three scores were tested in a multivariate design for repeated measures. The study population had taken part in earlier studies on the predictive value of the pre-intervention assessment1 and on the results relating to workstatus, pain intensity, perceived disability and symptoms after six months2. Results: The response rate was 92% (N=130). Of these, 11% did not work at all or worked a decreased number of hours per day due to back pain. At six months follow up, this figure was 13%. Of the ones who responded, 7% did not work at all at the time of interview or worked a decreased number of hours due to other symptoms. The average level of pain, disability and symptoms was lower compared to the status before entering the intervention programme (p < .001). Conclusion: The percentage of people who returned to work and stayed at work after a multidisciplinary programme remained stable over a period of three to four years. The results are good and about the same as the results after six months in terms of work status, pain intensity and symptoms