Aims. To investigate the risk factors for unsuccessful radial head reduction (RHR) in children with chronic
Introduction. Early identification and conservative management of paediatric
We present an original method for the treatment of neglected
Abstract:
Aims. To propose a new method for evaluating paediatric radial neck fractures and improve the accuracy of fracture angulation measurement, particularly in younger children, and thereby facilitate planning treatment in this population. Methods. Clinical data of 117 children with radial neck fractures in our hospital from August 2014 to March 2023 were collected. A total of 50 children (26 males, 24 females, mean age 7.6 years (2 to 13)) met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Cases were excluded for the following reasons: Judet grade I and Judet grade IVb (> 85° angulation) classification; poor radiograph image quality; incomplete clinical information; sagittal plane angulation; severe displacement of the ulna
The October 2012 Children’s orthopaedics Roundup. 360. looks at: magnetic growing rods and scoliosis correction; maintaining alignment after manipulation of a radial shaft fracture; Glaswegian children and swellings of obscure origin; long-term outcome of femoral derotation osteotomy in cerebral palsy; lower-leg fractures and compartment syndrome in children; fractures of the radial neck in children; management of the paediatric
Background. Chronic acquired radial head dislocations pose a complex problem in terms of surgical decision making, especially if surgery has already previously failed. There are several underlying causes that should be investigated, including previous trauma resulting in a missed
Purpose of study: To report the use of a forearm fascial strip to repair the annular ligament and treat late diagnosed or irreducible
Infection and re-fracture are well-described complications following open paediatric forearm fractures. The purpose of this paper is to determine if patient, injury, and treatment characteristics can be used to predict the occurrence of these complications following the surgical management of paediatric open forearm fractures. This is an IRB-approved retrospective review at a single-institution paediatric level 1 trauma centrefrom 2007–2013 of all open forearm fractures. Medical records were reviewed to determine the type of open fracture, time to administration of initial antibiotics, time from injury to surgery, type of fixation, length of immobilisation, and complications. Radiographs were studied to document fracture characteristics. 262 patients with an average age of 9.7 years were reviewed. There were 219 Gustillo-Anderson Type 1 open fractures, 39 Type 2 fractures, and 4 Type 3 fractures. There were 9 infections (3.4%) and 6 re-fractures (2.3%). Twenty-eight (10.7%) patients returned to the operating room for additional treatment; 21 of which were for removal of implants. Contaminated wounds, as documented within the medical record, had a greater chance of infection (21% vs 2.2%, p=0.002). No difference in infection rate was seen with regard to timing of antibiotics (p=0.87), timing to formal debridement (p=0.20), Type 1 versus Type 2 or 3 open fractures (3.4% vs 5.0%, p=0.64), 24 hours vs. 48 hours of post-operative IV antibiotics (5.2% vs 3.5%, p=0.53), or when comparing diaphyseal, distal, and
The clinical case refers to a male patient, 34 years old, admitted at the Emergency Department after a fall of 2 meters. Of that trauma, resulted an exposed
Purpose of the study: Complex fracture-dislocation of the elbow, and subsequent surgical treatment, is often the source of a stiff joint. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of a therapeutic protocol combining systematic insertion of a dynamic external fixator allowing early mobilization of the elbow with restitution of the radial height and the coronoid process. Material and methods: This consecutive series of ten patient, six men and four women, mean age 49 years, age range 27–67 years, underwent surgery from 2002 to 2004. Three patients presented a posterior
Isolated fractures of the ulnar diaphysis are uncommon, occurring at a rate of 0.02 to 0.04 per 1,000 cases. Despite their infrequency, these fractures commonly give rise to complications, such as nonunion, limited forearm pronation and supination, restricted elbow range of motion, radioulnar synostosis, and prolonged pain. Treatment options for this injury remain a topic of debate, with limited research available and no consensus on the optimal approach. Therefore, this trial aims to compare clinical, radiological, and functional outcomes of two treatment methods: open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) versus nonoperative treatment in patients with isolated ulnar diaphyseal fractures. This will be a multicentre, open-label, parallel randomized clinical trial (under National Clinical Trial number NCT01123447), accompanied by a parallel prospective cohort group for patients who meet the inclusion criteria, but decline randomization. Eligible patients will be randomized to one of the two treatment groups: 1) nonoperative treatment with closed reduction and below-elbow casting; or 2) surgical treatment with ORIF utilizing a limited contact dynamic compression plate and screw construct. The primary outcome measured will be the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire score at 12 months post-injury. Additionally, functional outcomes will be assessed using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey and pain visual analogue scale, allowing for a comparison of outcomes between groups. Secondary outcome measures will encompass clinical outcomes such as range of motion and grip strength, radiological parameters including time to union, as well as economic outcomes assessed from enrolment to 12 months post-injury.Aims
Methods
Abstract: A review study of 40 skeletally immature patients with displaced, diaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures treated with open reduction, internal fixation of radius only, using Mini DCP/one third tubular plate. Forty children (age range 5–13 years), treated between 1987–1999 by one surgeon were evaluated subjectively for pain or restriction of activities at games or school, clinically for range of movements at elbow, wrist and forearm rotation, and radiologically for residual angulation and time at healing. Duration of follow up was 2–12 years. Galeazzi and
Diaphyseal fractures can be divided into three groups comprising the basic types of fractures: fractures of both bones (radius and ulna), fracture dislocations, i.e., fractures of one of the bones accompanied by dislocation of the head of the other bone in the respective radioulnar joint, the Galeazzi fracture or the
Introduction. Chronic radial head dislocation in children after trauma is a serious condition. Often the dislocation is overseen initially and is a part of the
Introduction and objectives: This is a complex type of lesion that is frequently confused with
Number one in frequency of all fractures in children is the distal forearm fracture. The most common green-stick fracture with minor or no dislocation is treated by short or long arm cast. Depending on the age 4 or six weeks of immobilization is sufficient. Displaced fractures of the distal radius and ulna are treated by closed reduction under general anaesthesia or lighter forms of analgesia. Reduction is followed by fixation in the “Schede position” (flexion, ulnar abduction) with obligatory change of cast after 10–14 days. Healing can be expected after 6 weeks. As an alternative percutaneous pinning of the reduced fracture allows immobilization in a short arm cast and without the the unpleasant flexion and ulnar abduction (. Voto et al 1990. , . Mani et al 1993. , . Gibbons et al 1994. , Choi et al 1959). There is currently a prospective randomised study running organized by Mr Clarke from Southampton, to the advantages and disadvantages after use of pins or abstaining from them apparent risks. For midshaft forearm fractures closed reduction and long arm cast immobilisation had been treatment of choice in the past. Remanipulation under anaesthesia because of lack of retention of both bone fractures have been common. Concerns came up mainly in the age group above 10 years with a high rate of unsatisfactory results (. Kay et al 1986. ). Plate fixation of both bones is a difficult procedure and causes damage to the interosseous membrane and can enhance rotatory deficits. In addition ugly scars are not unusual. Intramedullary nails seemed advantageous. (. Amit et al 1985. ). J.L. Morote and the Spanish school of Sevilla were the first to use a minimal invasive method of reduction and K-wire fixation of midshaft and proximal forearm fractures. (Perez-Sicilia et al 1977). The French group in Nancy and Metz had the some years later and developed their elastic stable intramedullary system for forearm fractures . Metaizeau 1988. , . Lascombes et al. 1990. ). A high rate of excellent outcomes and hardly any complications were observed. Intramedullary fixation with elastic stable nails even permits immediate motion (. Verstreken et al 1988. ). The surgical technique of Morote using blunt-ended 1,6 to 1,8 mm K-wires is described in “Operative Technique in Orthopaedics and Trauma” (. Parsch 1990. ) The results were confirmed by Kaye Wilkins (1996), . Luhmann et al 1998. , and . Richter et al 1998. An unacceptable high rate of complications was seen in groups, who used pins, which were not buried, who removed pins to early and before consolidation or who had fixed only one bone (. Cullen et al 1998. , . Shoemaker et al 1999. ). We recommend the intramedullary system for all displaced forearm fractures of children above 6 years until closure of the growth plate.(. Parsch 1990. ). The learning curve is short, the time of surgery an average of 40 minutes. The radiation exposure can be limited by the use of short impulse image intensifier. There is virtually no blood loss. With the learning curve more than 80 % can be fixed by closed means. Open reduction might be necessary in adolescents, or in delayed fracture care. Postoperative immobilisation is a plaster shell or brace is used for 2 weeks, this is not obligatory. Postoperative infections have not been observed after this minimal invasive method. Skin irritations can be avoided by complete bending of the K-wire ends. In unacceptable malunion after conservative treatment closed or open realignment of the fractures followed by intramedullary Morote pinning is the treatment of choice. Refractures may happen with wires in place shortly or a long time after removal of the hardware. They are not associated to the system, but rather to the fact that some children are subject to repeated falls, liable to break an arm. Acute
Purpose: To describe the pattern of injury, surgical technique and outcomes of Monteggia type IID fracture dislocations. Method: Design: Retrospective review of prospectively collected clinical and radiographic patient data in orthopaedic trauma database with prospectively collected outcome scores. Setting: Level 1 university based trauma center. Patients / Participants: All patients with Monteggia type IID fracture dislocations admitted from January 2000 to July 2005. Intervention: Review of patient demographics, fracture pattern, method of fixation, complications, additional surgical procedures, and clinical and radiographic outcome measures. Main Outcome Measurements: Clinical outcomes: elbow range of motion, QuickDASH (Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand), PREE (Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation), complications. Radiographic outcomes: quality of fracture reduction, healing time, degenerative change and heterotopic ossification. Results: Sixteen patients were included in the study. All fractures united. There were seven complications in 6 patients including 3 contractures with associated heterotopic ossification, 1 pronator syndrome and late radial nerve palsy, 1 radial head collapse and a DVT in the same patient and 1 with prominent hardware. Outcome scores were obtained on 11 patients at an average of 49 months (range 25 – 82 months) post-operatively. The average Quickdash score was 11 (range 0–43) and the average PREE score was 13 (range 0–34). Conclusion: