Aims. Hip arthroplasty does not always restore normal anatomy. This is due to inaccurate surgery or lack of stem sizes. We evaluated the aptitude of four total hip arthroplasty systems to restore an anatomical and medialized hip rotation centre. Methods. Using 3D templating software in 49 CT scans of non-deformed femora, we virtually implanted: 1) small uncemented calcar-guided stems with two offset options (Optimys, Mathys), 2) uncemented straight stems with two offset options (Summit, DePuy Synthes), 3) cemented undersized stems (Exeter philosophy) with three offset options (CPT, ZimmerBiomet), and 4) cemented line-to-line stems (Kerboul philosophy) with proportional offsets (Centris, Mathys). We measured the distance between the templated and the anatomical and 5 mm medialized hip rotation centre. Results. Both rotation centres could be restored within 5 mm in 94% and 92% of cases, respectively. The cemented undersized stem performed best, combining freedom of stem positioning and a large offset range. The uncemented straight stem performed well because of its large and well-chosen offset range, and despite the need for cortical bone contact limiting stem positioning. The cemented line-to-line stem performed less well due to a small range of sizes and offsets. The uncemented calcar-guided stem performed worst, despite 24 sizes and a large and well-chosen offset range. This was attributed to the calcar curvature restricting the stem insertion depth along the femoral axis. Conclusion. In the majority of non-deformed femora, leg length, offset, and anteversion can be restored accurately with non-modular stems during 3D templating. Failure to restore hip biomechanics is mostly due to surgical inaccuracy. Small calcar guided stems offer no advantage to restore hip biomechanics compared to more traditional designs. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(7):476–485

Background. The decision to resurface the patella during total knee arthroplasty remains controversial. Aim of our study was to evaluate the functional difference between patients undergoing medial rotation knee (MRK) replacement with and without patellar resurfacing at our hospital. Methods. We did a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing MRK total knee replacement (Matortho) at our hospital between 2008 and 2017 performed by 2 surgeons. Patients were recalled for a clinical review from Oct 2017 for recording of Oxford knee, Baldini and Ferrel scores. Mann-Whitney U test was used for non-parametric data (SPSS v24). Results. Of the 104(49 males) patients, 62 had patellar resurfacing. Age and sex distribution was similar in both groups. The mean follow up period was 74.45 months in non- resurfaced group and 54.93 months in resurfaced group. The Median (Range) pre-operative Oxford knee scores were similar in both groups − 15(4–42) in non-resurfaced group and 14(1–44) in resurfaced group. The median OKS at follow-up were 36(12–47) in non-resurfaced group and 37(9–48) in resurfaced group. The Patellar scores were slightly better in the resurfaced group – Baldini score median (range) (90 (25–100) in non resurfaced v/s 100(30–100) in resurfaced), Ferrel score (median (range) 25(12–30) in non-resurfaced v/s 28(10–30) in resurfaced, p 0.042). The patellofemoral component of the OKS (Q5 + Q7 + Q12) median (range) showed an improvement from 3(1–11) to 6.5 (3–11) in non-resurfaced group and from 3(0–12) to 8 (2–12) (p 0.039) in resurfaced group. Conclusion. Although the overall functional knee scores in non-resurfaced and resurfaced groups were same, we found a statistically significant difference in Ferrel score and in the patellofemoral component of OKS between the 2 groups of MRK knee replacement suggesting specific benefits of patellar resurfacing

The performance of total knee arthroplasty in deeply flexed postures is of increasing concern as the procedure is performed on younger, more physically active and more culturally diverse populations. Several implant design factors, including tibiofemoral conformity, tibial slope and posterior condylar geometry have been shown directly to affect deep flexion performance. The goal of this study was to evaluate the performance of a fixed-bearing, asymmetric, medial rotation arthroplasty design during kneeling activities. Thirteen study participants (15 knees) with primary total knee arthroplasty (Medial Rotation Knee, Finsbury, Surrey, UK) were observed while doing a step activity and kneeling on a padded bench from 90° to maximum comfortable flexion using lateral fluoroscopy. Subjects averaged 74 years of age and nine were female. Subjects were an average of 17 months post-operative, and scored 94 points on the International Knee Score and 99 on the Functional Score. Digitised fluoroscopic images were corrected for geometric distortion and 3D models of the implant components were registered to determine the 3D position and orientation of the implants in each image. During the step activity, the medial and the lateral femoral contact point stayed fairly constant with no axial rotation from 0 to 100° of flexion. At maximum kneeling flexion, the knees exhibited 119° of implant flexion (101°-139°), 7° (-7° to 17°) tibial internal rotation, and the lateral condyle translated backwards by 11 mm. Patients with medial rotation knee arthroplasty exhibited medial pivot action with no paradoxical translation. The knees exhibited excellent kneeling flexion and posterior translation of the femur with respect to the tibia. The axial rotation in MRK was within the range of normal knee kinematics from -10 to 120 (perhaps 140)

Purpose. To report clinical results and demonstrate any posterior femoral translation (PFT) in medial rotation total knee arthroplasty (TKA) of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) retaining type. Materials and Methods. A prospective study was performed upon thirty consecutive subjects who were operated on with medial rotation TKA of PCL retaining type (Advance® Medial Pivot prosthesis with ‘Double High’ insert; Wright Medical Technology, Arlington, TN, USA) (Fig. 1). between March 2009 and March 2010 and had been followed up for a least 2 years. Inclusion criteria were age between 60 and 75 years and primary degenerative joint disease of knee graded as Kellgren Lawrence grade III or higher. Exclusion criteria were age under 60 years, any inflammatory joint disease including rheumatoid arthritis, early stage of primary degenerative joint disease of knee or any history of previous osteotomy around knee. Clinically, the knee society knee score and function score were used to evaluate pain and function. At last follow-up, all subjects performed full extension, thirty degree flexion and full active flexion sequentially under fluoroscopic surveillance. In each of these lateral radiographs, anteroposterior(AP) condylar position was pinpointed and the magnitude of PFT was determined by degree of transition of AP condylar position from full extension to full active flexion radiograph (Fig. 2 A–B). Statistical methods used were paired t-test, Pearson correlation, Steadman rank correlation and regression analysis. Component migration and radiolucent line were also observed. Results. At last follow-up, the mean knee society knee score and the mean function score improved significantly compared to preoperative scores (from 61.5 to 90.4 and from 57.8 to 84.7 respectively). The mean maximum flexion of knee increased postoperatively compared to preoperative one without any significant difference (105.5Ëš±11.2Ëšvs 109.3Ëš±9.8Ëš, p=0.051, β=0.387). Neverthless, regression analysis showed a good linear association (r = 0.53, p=0.0027) between the pre- and post-operative maximum flexions of knee. The AP condylar positions were consistently posterior to midline throughout the entire range of flexion. The mean maximum PFT was 10.5 mm (± 4.3 mm) and the magnitude of maximum PFT was greater in higher flexion cases (r = 0.57, p = 0.0009) (Fig. 3). There were no cases having either component migration or radiolucent line except for one case showing instability related to trauma. Conclusions. In medial rotation total knee arthroplasty of PCL retaining type, clinical outcomes were satisfactory and the maximum obtainable flexions tended to be in narrower ranges than those of preoperative ones and smaller than those of other TKA prostheses. Nonetheless, reliable posterior femoral translations were observed during progressive flexions of knees, which was considered to be one of important kinematic factors in increasing the level of knee flexion of medial-rotation TKA in longer follow-ups by providing greater posterior clearance and reduced femoro-tibial impingement

Aim: To ascertain if a medial rotation platform knee replacement design (MRK; Finsbury Orthopaedics) exhibits improved range of motion (ROM) and functional outcome compared to a conventional single radius condylar knee replacement system (PFC Sigma; Depuy) at one year. Methods: Eighty patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty(TKA) were prospectively randomised and allocated to either receive the MRK or PFC Sigma pros-thesis. Patients were blinded to the choice of implant. Follow-up clinical and radiological evaluations were carried out by a single clinician so as to avoid interob-server error. Validated patient based scores including the Total Knee Function Questionnaire (TKFQ) were used to assess patient function. Results: The average ROM in the MRK group was 108.53°. In the PFC Sigma group it was 94.16°. Statistical significance was demonstrated between the two groups. The MRK group showed superior results in the TKFQ score which assesses activities of daily living as well as recreational and sporting activities. The movement and lifestyle component of the TKFQ, and the Knee Society Score were better in the MRK group with statistical significance. No difference was demonstrated between the two groups with respect to radiological analysis, WOMAC Knee, Oxford Knee and SF-36 scores. 6 out of 40 patients in the MRK group compared to 5 out of 40 patients in the PFC group said that they had forgotten about their TKA at one year. Conclusions: The medial rotation platform design confers increased ROM at one year with an associated benefit in movement and lifestyle and resultant patient satisfaction

Postoperative knee stability is critical in determining the success after reconstruction; however, only posterior and anterior stability is assessed. Therefore, this study investigates medial and lateral rotational knee laxity changes after partial and complete PCL tear and after PCL allograft reconstruction. The extending Lachman test assessed knee instability in six fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees. Tibia rotation was measured for the native knee, after partial PCLT (pPCLT), after full PCLT (fPCLT), and then after PCLR tensioned at 30° and 90°. In addition, tests were performed for the medial and lateral sides. The tibia was pulled with 130N using a digital force gauge. A compression load of 50N was applied to the joint on the universal testing machine (MTS Systems) to induce contact. Three-dimensional tibial rotation was measured using a motion capture system (Optotrak). On average, the tibia rotation increased by 33%-42% after partial PCL tear, and by 62%-75% after full PCL tear when compared to the intact case. After PCL reconstruction, the medial tibia rotation decreased by 33% and 37% compared to the fPCL tear in the case that the allograft was tensioned at 30° and 90° of flexion, respectively. Similarly, lateral tibial rotation decreased by 15% and 2% for allograft tensioned at 30° and 90° of flexion respectively, compared to the full tear. Rotational decreases were statistically significant (p<0.005) at the lateral pulling after tensioning the allograft at 90°. PCLR with the graft tensioned at 30° and 90° both reduced medial knee laxity after PCLT. These results suggest that while both tensioning angles restored medial knee stability, tensioning the Achilles graft at 30° of knee flexion was more effective in restoring lateral knee stability throughout the range of motion from full extension to 90° flexion, offering a closer biomechanical resemblance to native knee function

While numerous studies have examined dislocation caused by basic everyday movements, no objective studies have investigated body positions to minimize risk of dislocation during intercourse. We therefore used a four-dimensional motion analysis system to assess sexual activities in patients who had undergone total hip arthroplasty (THA), to identify body positions displaying less risk of dislocation. Five body-surface infrared sensors were placed on five healthy female volunteers, and maximum hip joint angle was measured. Subjects were asked to take the following three body positions: supine (missionary); top (woman on top); and kneeling (doggy-style). Angle data obtained using body surface markers were combined with three-dimensional skeletal models extracted using CT images obtained from the 24 joints of 16 patients who had undergone THA, to ascertain angles at which collision with the artificial joint or skeleton would occur. Collision angle for: supine position at maximum abduction in flexion was 77±16° in flexion and 82±57° in medial rotation; top position at maximum extension was 36±16° in flexion and 68±53° in medial rotation; top position at maximum flexion was 12±9° in flexion and 14±11° in medial rotation; kneeling position at maximum extension was 115±1° in flexion and 127±44° in medial rotation; and kneeling position at maximum flex-ion was 14±8° in flexion and 17±11° in medial rotation. The present study only assessed risk for dislocation caused by collision with the artificial joint or skeleton, and did not take into account the effects of soft tissue. However, we were able to quantitatively assess angle of the hip joint for some leg positions involved with various common coital positions. The results showed that the supine position at maximum abduction in flexion is relatively safe, since the range of motion before collision would occur was relatively wide. In addition, top and kneeling positions at maximum extension were relatively safe, but caution must be exercised at maximum flexion, as not much extra angle was available in flexion and medial rotation

Introduction: Upper root injuries (C5–C6±C7) account for 75 % of all obstetric brachial plexus palsies (OBPP). Among them, about thirty percent develop a medial contracture of the shoulder due to an imbalance between strong internal rotators and weak external rotators. This causes glenohumeral deformities. To decrease the internal contracture it had been proposed either to release the subscapularis (Sever procedure) or to perform a capsular release (Fairbank procedure). Arthroscopic capsular release was proposed in young patient to reduce the medial contracture. Material & methods: Six children with an average age of 23 months and 1 case aged 12 years old, had a medial contracture of the shoulder secondary to a C5–C6 ( 3 cases) or C5–C7 (4 cases) obstetrical palsy. An arthroscopic evaluation of the deformities was performed in 3 cases. Next a surgical subscapularis release was applied in association with a latissimus dorsi transfer. An arthroscopic evaluation of the joint associated with an arthroscopic capsular release (release of the coracohumeral ligament) was performed in 4 cases. In addition, the latissimus dorsi was transfered. Pre and Post operative passive external rotation were measured in degrees in R1 position. Pre and post operative medial rotation were evaluated according to the Mallet classification. A comparative evaluation of the glenohumeral deformities were performed between pre-operative MRI and arthroscopic results. Results: An arthroscopic evaluation of the glenohumeral joint was performed in 6 cases. In one case the arthroscopic evaluation could not be performed. In the 6 cases, arthroscopy confirmed the MRI lesion : 3 posterior subluxations, 1 posterior luxation and 2 normal joints. The subscapularis release allowed an increase in the passive lateral rotation of an average of 50°. However, a decrease of 1 point in the medial rotation was noted according to Mallet evaluation. The coracohumeral ligament arthroscopic release allowed an increase in the passive lateral rotation of an average of 60° without decreasing the passive medial rotation. Whatever the method used, a reduction of the subluxation of the glenohumeral joint was obtained. Discussion & Conclusion: Medial contracture of the shoulder may begin in the first two years of life and an early reduction with muscular release and transfers was proposed. However, the precise nature of the progressive limitation of the external passive rotation remains unclear. Is the limitation due to a contracture of the medial rotators or a capsular retraction or a combination of both? Harryman demonstrated the role of the rotator interval capsule and coracohumeral ligament in limiting the external rotation. Our hypothesis was that capsular retraction occurred before the muscular contracture. As a result we decided to perform a capsular release in patients under 24 months. The results on the passive external rotation were similar with both methods. Although, the technique of an arthroscopic release was difficult and demanding, it appears that this technique is beneficial as it allows an evaluation of the joint deformity and treatment of the contracture in the same time. Arthroscopic release is a safe but demanding technique which allows an increase in the external passive rotation in OBPP. It should be noted that this technique requires a significant practice

Background. In the late 1980's Michael Freeman conceived the idea that knee replacement would most closely replicate the natural knee joint, if the medial Tibio-Femoral articulation was configured as a “ball-in-socket”. Over the last three decades, medial rotation and medial pivot designs have proved successful in clinical use. Freeman's final iteration of the medial ball-in-socket concept was the Medial Sphere knee. We report the three-year survivorship, clinical outcomes, patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and radiographic analysis of this implant in a multi-centre, multi-surgeon, prospective observational study. Methods. Patients awaiting total knee replacement were recruited by four centres. They had no medical contraindication to surgery, were able to provide informed consent and were available for follow-up. Primary outcome was implant survival at six months, one, two, three and five years. Secondary outcomes were patient reported outcome measures: Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Euroqol (EQ-5D), International Knee Society Score (IKSS), IKSS Functional score and Health State score, complications and radiographic outcomes. Radiographic analysis was undertaken using the TraumaCad software and data analysis was undertaken using SPSS. Results. To date, 328 female and 202 male patients with a mean age 66.9 years and mean body mass index 30.0 were recruited. Three year Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis of cumulative failure showed an implant survival of 99.46% (95% confidence interval 100 – 96.74), when deaths and withdrawals were treated as censored data. Twelve patients withdrew (2.26%), seven died (1.32%) and two knees were revised (0.38%). The mean EQ5D, Health State Scores, OKS, IKSS & IKSS Function scores at three years improved significantly from pre- operative scores (Health State Score: 9.91 (65.59 pre-op to 75.50); OKS: 18.82 (19.90 pre-op to 38.72); IKSS: 39.87 (44.39 pre-op to 92.09); IKSS Function Score: 35.03 (49.42 pre-op to 84.45). The mean improvement of EQ5D at three years was: 0.34 (0.48 pre-op to 0.82). Discussion. Survival of the GMK Sphere to three years in this study was over 99%. Risk of revision compares favourably with UK National Joint Registry (NJR) data. The improvements that are seen in patient reported outcome measures reflect an enhancement in patient function and quality of life. Conclusion. At three years follow-up, the implant demonstrates satisfactory survival and outcomes. Patient matching and evaluation of more cases, at more time points will allow outcome comparison with other implant options

Aims

Research on hip biomechanics has analyzed femoroacetabular contact pressures and forces in distinct hip conditions, with different procedures, and used diverse loading and testing conditions. The aim of this scoping review was to identify and summarize the available evidence in the literature for hip contact pressures and force in cadaver and in vivo studies, and how joint loading, labral status, and femoral and acetabular morphology can affect these biomechanical parameters.

Introduction. Natural population variation in femoral morphology results in a large range of offsets, anteversion angles and lengths. During total hip arthroplasty, accurate restoration of hip biomechanics is essential to achieve good functional results. One option is to restore the anatomic hip rotation center. Alternatively, medializing the rotation center and compensating by increasing the femoral offset, reduces acetabular contact forces and increases the abductor lever arm. We investigated the ability of two cemented stem systems to restore hip biomechanics in an anatomic and medialized way. We compared an undersized “Exeter-type” of stem with three offset options and 18 sizes (CPT, Zimmer), to a line-to-line “Kerboul-type” of stem with proportional offset and 12 sizes (Centris, Mathys). Methods. Thirty CT scans of whole femora were segmented and the hip rotation center, proximal femoral axis and femoral length were determined with Mimics and 3-matic (Materialise). Using scripting functionality in the software, CAD design files of both stems were automatically sized and aligned along the proximal femoral axis to restore an anatomical and a 5 mm medialized hip rotation center. Stem size and position could be fine-tuned manually. The maximum distances between the prosthetic (PRC), the anatomic (ARC) and the medialized hip rotation center (MRC) were calculated (Fig. 1). Variations in femoral offset (ΔFO), anteroposterior (ΔAP) and proximodistal distance (ΔPD) were analyzed. Finally, the number of cases where the hip rotation center could be restored within 5 mm was reported. Results. Both implants allowed restoring the ARC accurately (mean distance PRC-ARC: CPT 0.97±0.88 mm, Centris 1.66±1.59 mm; mean difference ΔFO: CPT 0.09±0.19 mm, Centris 0.11±0.29 mm; mean difference ΔAP: CPT 0.12±1.22°, Centris 0.27±1.78 mm, mean difference ΔPD: CPT 0.04±0.44 mm, Centris 0.49±1.35 mm). The CPT stem allowed restoring the PRC within 5 mm of the ARC in all cases (max. 4.31 mm), whereas the Centris stem achieved this in only 28/30 hips (max. 6.72 mm) (Fig. 2). Aiming for a MRC was less satisfactory with both stems (mean distance PRC-MRC: CPT 1.38±1.63 mm, Centris 3.61±2.73 mm; mean difference ΔFO: CPT 0.09±0.10 mm, Centris 0.06±0.35 mm; mean difference ΔAP: CPT 0.17±2.02 mm, Centris 2.58±2.68 mm, mean difference ΔDP; CPT 0.28±0.67 mm, Centris 1.98±1.66 mm). The CPT stem allowed restoring the PRC within 5 mm of the MRC in 29/30 cases (max. 8.09 mm), whereas the Centris stem achieved this in only 25/30 cases (max. 11.15 mm) (Fig. 3). Discussion. Although both stem systems allowed restoring hip biomechanics accurately in most cases, the CPT system was superior to the Centris stem for achieving both ARC and MRC. This could be explained by more implant sizes (18 vs. 12) and undersized stems offering more freedom to correct version. Although medializing the hip rotation center offers biomechanical advantages, both stems had more difficulties achieving this. In some cases, differences between aimed and planned rotation centers were close to 1 cm which might negatively impact on clinical outcome. As such, to avoid suboptimal reconstructions with the available implants, templating is mandatory especially when aiming at a medialized reconstruction strategy

INTRODUCTION. In native knees anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and asymmetric shape of the tibial articular surface with a convex lateral plateau are responsible for differential medial and lateral femoral rollback. Contemporary ACL retaining total knee arthroplasty (TKA) improves knee function over ACL sacrificing (CR) TKA; however, these implants do not restore the asymmetric tibial articular geometry. This may explain why ACL retention addresses paradoxical anterior sliding seen in CR TKA, but does not fully restore medial pivot motion. To address this, an ACL retaining biomimetic implant, was designed by moving the femoral component through healthy in vivo kinematics obtained from bi-planar fluoroscopy and sequentially removing material from a tibial template. We hypothesized that the biomimetic articular surface together with ACL preservation would better restore activity dependent kinematics of normal knees, than ACL retention alone. METHODS. Kinematic performance of the biomimetic BCR design (asymmetric tibia with convex lateral surface), a contemporary BCR implant (symmetric shallow dished tibia) and a contemporary CR implant (symmetric dished tibia) was analyzed using KneeSIM software. Chair-sit, deep knee bend, and walking were analyzed. Components were mounted on an average bone model created from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data of 40 normal knees. Soft-tissue insertions were defined on the average knee model based on MRI data, and mechanical properties were obtained from literature. Femoral condyle center motions relative to the tibia were tracked to compare different implant designs. RESULTS. During simulated chair-sit, the biomimetic BCR implant showed knee motion similar to that reported for healthy knees in vivo including medial pivot rotation with greater rollback of the lateral femoral condyle (5 mm medial vs. 11 mm lateral). The CR implant showed posterior femoral subluxation in extension, paradoxical anterior sliding until 60° flexion followed by limited rollback until 105° with no medial pivot rotation. The conventional BCR implant reduced initial posterior shift of the femur in extension, however, medial pivot rotation and steady posterior rollback was not achieved. Similar trends were also found for deep knee bend activity. During walking the CR implant showed posterior subluxation in extension followed by anterior motion similar to the chair-sit activity. Both BCR implants showed less femoral excursion without posterior subluxation similar to published in vivo kinematics data for bi-uni patients. CONCLUSION. By simulating a variety of daily activities with different ranges of knee motion we were able to show that the ACL preserving biomimetic TKA implant could restore activity dependent normal knee kinematics unlike contemporary ACL retaining and ACL sacrificing implants. For chair-sit activity there was a clear medial pivot pattern for the biomimetic BCR design (unlike any other implant), while for lower flexion activities there was no medial pivot apparent in our simulations. These activity dependent knee motions are consistent with published in vivo kinematics and confirmed our hypothesis that biomimetic articular surface together with ACL preservation may be required to restore normal knee function. The biomimetic BCR design with its anatomical articular surface together with ACL preservation may provide patients with a more normal feeling knee following TKA surgery

INTRODUCTION. ACL retaining (BCR) Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) provides more normal kinematics than ACL sacrificing (CR) TKA. However, in the native knee the ACL and the asymmetric shape of the tibial articular surface with a convex lateral plateau are responsible for the differential medial/lateral femoral rollback (medial pivot). Therefore, the hypothesis of this study was that an asymmetric biomimetic articular surface together with ACL preservation would better restore native knee kinematics than retention of the ACL alone. Normal knee kinematics from bi-planar fluoroscopy was used to reverse engineer the tibial articular surface of the biomimetic implant. This was achieved by moving the femoral component through the healthy knee kinematics and removing material from a tibial template. METHODS. LifeModeler KneeSIM software was used to analyze a biomimetic BCR implant (asymmetric tibia with convex lateral surface), a contemporary BCR (symmetric shallow dished tibia) and a contemporary CR (symmetric dished tibia) implant during simulated deep knee bend and chair sit. Components were mounted on an average bone model created from Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data of 40 normal knees. The soft-tissue insertions were obtained from the average knee model and the mechanical properties were obtained from literature. Femoral condyle center motions relative to the tibia were used to compare different implant designs. In vivo knee kinematics of healthy subjects from published literature was used for reference. RESULTS. During simulated deep knee bend, the ACL sacrificing contemporary CR implant showed initial posterior femoral subluxation due to the absent ACL, followed by paradoxical anterior sliding until 90° flexion, and no medial pivot rotation. Retention of the ACL in the contemporary BCR implant reduced the initial posterior shift of the femur in extension. However, medial pivot rotation and steady posterior rollback could not be achieved. In contrast, the biomimetic BCR implant showed knee motion very similar to that reported for healthy knees in vivo, with medial pivot rotation and greater, consistent rollback of the lateral femoral condyle than the medial condyle (11 mm medial vs. 16 mm lateral, Fig. 1 and Fig. 3). Similar trends were seen for all implants during simulated chair sit (Fig. 2 and Fig. 3). CONCLUSION. An ACL preserving biomimetic TKA implant was able to restore normal knee kinematics unlike contemporary ACL retaining and ACL sacrificing implants, during the simulated activities. This confirmed the hypothesis that a biomimetic articular surface together with ACL preservation is required to restore normal knee kinematics

Kinematics of the knee change during the full range of flexion [1]. The lateral femoral condyle (LFC) rolls back progressively through the entire range of flexion. The medial femoral condyle (MFC) does not move back during the first 110 degrees, but from 110 to 160 degrees it moves back by 10mm. This dual arc makes anatomical knee design a challenging task. In medial rotation, during flexion, the MFC stays in place, but the LFC moves forward in extension and backward in flexion. In lateral rotation the LFC stays still while the MFC moves back and forward in flexion and extension. During central rotation both condyles move reciprocally. However the knee is stable against an anteriorly or posteriorly directed force. It is important that all these degrees of freedom and stability are reproduced in total knee replacement (TKR) design. Furthermore, the two femoral condyles together form a spiral. Like the threads of a screw in a nut they allow medio-lateral translation of the femur [2] in the tibial reference frame. During flexion the knee centre moves laterally nearly 20% of the width of the tibial plateau and in extension the femur translates medially. This medio-lateral translation occurs in the natural normal knee joint. This has special significance in knee design because the natural femur (along with the trochlea) moves laterally in flexion, allowing the patella to be sited laterally, while most regular TKRs drive the patella medially. In order to test this anomaly we studied patellar maltracking in vivo and in cadavers. In vivo tracking studies using a patellar tracker during total knee replacement demonstrated average patellar maltracking of 10mm with regular TKR designs. Experiments on 22 cadaveric limbs using loaded quadriceps mechanism and trackers on the femur, tibia and patella, showed that in the natural knee the patella tracked medially by an average of 5mm. In regular TKRs the patella tracked medially. Compared to a normal knee, the patella in these designs maltracked on average by 10mm. Spiral condyles applied to the same bone cuts in the cadavers allowed the patella tracking to return to the expected lateral position in flexion. This has application to total knee replacement design. Unless the spiral design is incorporated in the condyles, patellar maltracking is inevitable and is likely to cause lateral knee pain and stiffness post-operatively

The natural knee allows multi-planar freedoms of rotation and translation, while retaining stability in the antero-posterior direction. It allows flexion with roll back, and medial, lateral and central rotation movements. The natural femoral condyles of the knee are spiral, therefore inducing a side to side translatory movement during flexion and extension. Incorporating all these features is vital in successful knee replacement design. The different knee designs currently in use demonstrate different deficiencies in knee function. A study of 150 Posterior Cruciate (PCL) Retaining Total Knee Replacements [1] has shown that in 72% of knees direct impingement of the tibial insert posteriorly against the back of the femur was responsible for blocking further flexion. The mean pre-operative range of flexion was 105° and post-operative was 105.9°. For every 2mm decrease in posterior condylar offset, the maximum flexion was reduced by 12.2°. The major disadvantage of the Posterior Stabilised (PS) Total Knee Replacement is gross anterior to posterior mid-flexion instability [2]. The Medial Rotation Total Knee Replacement is good in mid-flexion but not in high flexion where the femur slides forward on the tibia leading to impingement. The Birmingham Knee Replacement (BKR) is a rotating platform knee design which is stable throughout the range of flexion. In high flexion, the BKR brings the femur to the back of the tibia. The BKR also has spiral femoral condyles, matching the natural kinematics of the knee. The combined static and dynamic effect is 10mm lateral translation of the femur in flexion and vice versa in extension. Results for seventy nine BKRs (in seventy two patients) show the best Oxford Knee Score of 12 at follow up – excluding ten patients whose inferior scores were due to other pathologies. Knee flexion results show a 21° post-operative improvement in range of flexion. On objective independent testing, maximum walking speed is slower for patients with a standard knee replacement (6.5km/h) and the loading through the replaced side does not match the normal side. Comparatively, patients with a BKR have a faster maximum walking speed of 11km/h and the loading closely matches that of the normal knee. Studies based on the National Joint Register PROMs data [2] show that nearly thirty percent of Total Knee Replacement patients are not much better since their operation. A lot of improvement is needed in the design of knee replacements in order to achieve better function for knee replacement patients

Patellar maltracking after total knee arthroplasy (TKA) introduces complications such as anterior knee pain and patellar subluxation, generally due to prosthetic component malallignment in both tibiofemoral (TF) and patellofemoral joints. It is still debated if it is necessary to resurface the patella, which would better adapt the patellar articular surface to the prosthetic femoral troclea with a prosthesis, but also result in possible bone fractures. In this study, an in-vitro analysis is presented in order to identify differences between intact and TKA patellar tracking with and without patellar resurfacing and to show how much the latter is similar to intact knee patellar tracking. Three fresh-frozen amputated legs with knees free from anatomical defects and with intact joint capsule, collaterals and quadriceps tendon were analyzed using the Stryker knee navigation system (Kalamazoo, MI-USA). Landmark digitations were used to define anatomical frames for femur, tibia and patella. Manually driven TF flexions, from 0 to 140, were performed under conditions of no load and of 10 kg on the quadriceps, with intact knee and TKA with patella resurfaced and not. TF flex/extension, intra/extra rotation, ad/abduction were calculated according to a standard convention. Patellar flex/extension, medial/lateral tilt, rotation and shift were calculated according to a recently proposed articular convention. Since more repeatable, results relative to trials under 10 kg are reported. Intact knee: 4 abduction; considerable intra rotation (from 16 to 4), followed by continuous extra rotation starting at 30 TF flexion; linear increase in patellar flexion (from 20 to 110); initial medial patellar rotation (from 12 to 8), followed by medial rotation starting at 60 TF flexion; initial lateral patellar tilt (from 4 lateral to 4 medial), followed by medial tilt starting at 70 TF flexion; initial 6 mm lateral patellar shifts from 0 to 80 TF flexion, followed by 4 mm medial shift. TKA knee: small differences in ad/abduction between intact and TKA knees, both with and without resurfaced patella; slight initial extra rotation, followed by continuous intra rotation starting at 20 TF flexion; linear increase in the flexion of the patella, both resurfaced and not, close to the that of the intact knee; patellar rotation more lateral than in the intact knee; patellar tilt without resurfaced patella closer to the intact knee one; 6 mm lateral patellar shift, likely accounted for the surgical technique. Slightly more than TKA with resurfaced patella, TKA with non resurfaced patella flexes nearly like the intact knee. The closeness in values of patellar flexion and tilt represents a proof of the closeness in behavior of not resurfaced patella in TKA to the patella in the intact knee

Introduction. Inability to reproduce 6-degrees of freedom (6DOF) kinematics, abnormal “paradoxical” anterior femoral translation and loss of normal medial pivot rotation are challenges associated with contemporary posterior cruciate retaining and posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The removal of the anterior and/or both cruciate ligaments in CR/PS TKA, leading to significant kinematic alteration of the knee joint, has been suggested as one of the potential contributory factors in patients remaining dissatisfied after TKA. Bi-cruciate retaining (BCR) TKA designs allow preservation of both anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments with the potential to replicate normal knee joint kinematics. Physically demanding tasks such as sit-to-stand (STS), and deep lunging may be more sensitive tools for investigating preserved kinematic abnormalities following TKA. This study aims to compare in-vivo kinematics between the operated and the contralateral non-operated knee in patients with contemporary BCR TKA design. Methods. Twenty-nine patients (14 male; 15 female, 65.7±7.7 years) unilaterally implanted with a contemporary BCR TKA design featuring an asymmetric femoral component and independently designed medial and lateral bearings were evaluated. Mean follow-up time after BCR TKA was 12.7±5.1 months. All patients received a computer tomography (CT) scan from the pelvis to the ankles for the creation of 3D surface models of both knees (BCR TKA and non-operated). Patients performed single leg deep lunges and sit-to-stand under a validated dual fluoroscopic imaging system (DFIS) surveillance. Each patient's 2D dynamic fluoroscopic images, corresponding 3D surface bone models (for contralateral non-operated knee) and computer aided design (CAD) implant models (for the BCR TKA implanted knee) were imported into a virtual DFIS environment in MATLAB. An optimization procedure was utilized to perform matching between the 3D surface bone models and the 2D fluoroscopic image outlines. In-vivo 6DOF kinematics of the BCR TKA knees and contralateral non-operated side were quantified and analyzed. Results. When performing the high-flexion lunge, BCR TKA knees demonstrated less average femoral posterior translation (13±4mm) during terminal flexion when compared to the contralateral non-operated knees (16.6±3.7mm) (p=0.001). Similarly, during STS, less femoral rollback was observed (11.6±4.5mm vs 14.4±4.6mm, p<0.04) in BCR TKA knees. Overall, BCR TKA knees partially reproduced a normal “screw-home” motion, demonstrating reduced internal rotation during several intervals of the cycles for strenuous flexion activities. BCR TKA knees demonstrated less internal rotation during high-flexion lunge (4±5.6° vs 6.5±6.1°, p=0.05). Similarly, during STS, less internal rotation was observed (4.5±6° vs 6.9±6.3°, p=0.04, p=0.02, p=0.01, p=0.02) in BCR TKA knees. Conclusion. The BCR TKA design demonstrated asymmetries in flexion-extension and internal-external rotation, suggesting that in-vivo tibiofemoral kinematic parameters are not fully restored in BCR patients during functionally strenuous activities such as single leg deep lunges and sit-to-stand. Further studies are required to elucidate the importance of patient factors, surgical component orientation and implant designs in optimizing in vivo kinematics in patients with BCR TKA. For figures, tables, or references, please contact authors directly

Purpose of the study: Kinetic studies of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in vivo have provided divergent data but have agreed on one point: knee kinetics is abnormal after TKA. Restitution of a normal kinetics is thus the goal to reach to improve functional outcome after TKA. The Journey. ®. TKA is specifically designed to induce automatic medial rotation of the tibia during flexion. This would align the extensor system during flexion and would reduce mediolateral shear forces applied to the patellofemoral joint. Fluoroscopic dynamic studies have been conducted in vivo to confirm the reality of the femorotibal kinematics but to date there has been no study of the patellofemoral kinematics. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard for exploring the knee. The important artefacts caused by metal implants made of chromium-cobalt alloys make it difficult or impossible to interpret the images in patients with TKA. Oxinium. ®. implants are weakly ferromagnetic, allowing the development of a specific MRI sequence which can be used to explore a TKA. Material and methods: We used this technique in vivo for a 3D exploration of the patellofemoral kinematics of six Jouney. ®. TKA in comparison with five Genesis II. ®. TKA with preservation of the posterior cruciate ligament and with 13 normal knees. We analysed: patellofemoral surface area of contact, patellar translation and shift during weight-bearing flexion. Results: The results showed that the patellofemoral kinematics of the Journey. ®. TKA are close to that observed in normal knees and that the patellofemoral pressures of the posterior cruciate ligament TKA are significantly higher than with the Journey. ®. TKA. Discussion: These findings confirm our initial hypothesis and allow hop for better functional outcome and reduced wear of the patellar implant with the Journey. ®. TKA

Aims

Medial pivot (MP) total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) were designed to mimic native knee kinematics with their deep medial congruent fitting of the tibia to the femur almost like a ball-on-socket, and a flat lateral part. GMK Sphere is a novel MP implant. Our primary aim was to study the migration pattern of the tibial tray of this TKA.

Purpose of the study: In vivo kinematics of the knee joint (anteroposterior translation or rollback, axial rotation, elevation of the femoral condyle, range of motion) was determined for the knees of 30 subjects with a total knee prosthesis with a fixed or mobile plateau and also for the normal knees. Material and methods: Videofluoroscopic images were recorded during gait and maximal flexion. An automatic 3D adaptation-modelling process was then applied to the fluoroscopic images to determine knee kinematics. Results: For the normal knee, a certain degree of femoral rollback was noted for the lateral compartment (4.2 mm on average) while minimal translation was observed medially. The femoral rollback increased laterally during maximal flexion (14.4 mm on average) while the medial translation was minimal (1.5 mm on average). Thus, the average movement, which was not observed for all normal knees tested, was a pivot movement centred medially. The variability observed during maximal flexion was wide for all knee prostheses with a fixed or mobile plateau which do not have a stabilising system substituting for the absent posterior cruciate. During flexion, the normal knees exhibited mean 10° external rotation of the over the tibia. All of the rotational knee prostheses presented external rotation (mean 5°, ragne 0–10°). Inversely, the posterostabilised prostheses exhibited medial rotation of the femur over the tibia (mean 5°, range 0–10°), i.e. paradoxical movement. Discussion: Unlike the normal knee where femoral rollback occurs during maximal flexion, paradoxical anterior translation of the femorotibial point of contact after arthroplasty, in particular in subjects with a fixed plateau prosthesis. For prostheses substituting for the posterior cruciate, femoral rollback involving the lateral condyle occurs regularly with minimal variability in the femorotibial contact point due to the regular engagement of the cam and cam follower mechanism during maximal flexion