Introduction

We aimed to retrospectively identify risk factors for delayed / non-union for first metatarsophalangeal joint fusion.

Arthrodesis of the 1st metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) is a common procedure used for the treatment of end stage arthritis. We studied a cohort of patients who underwent an isolated 1st MTPJ Fusion for the treatment of hallux rigidus. Here we report the 10-year clinical outcomes, complication rate, requirement for further surgery and patient experience. All patients, who underwent an isolated 1st MTPJ Fusion for osteoarthritis from June 2008 until November 2011 were included. Demographics, clinical outcome data and subsequent procedures performed were collected from a departmental database (Bluespier). Patients were contacted and asked to complete the MOxFQ questionnaire and rate their satisfaction using pain, function and if they would undergo the surgery again. Mean follow up was 10.85 (range 9–12) years. A total of 161 patients (183 feet) underwent an isolated 1st MTPJ fusion during this time period. 156 of the feet showed a successful arthrodesis (85.2% fusion rate); 27 patients required revision surgery, 19 (10.4%) for a symptomatic non-union and 8 (4.4%) for mal-union. Those patients with co-morbidities (diabetes and gout) required revision earlier than those without (p<0.01). Average MOxFQ score was 16.6 (0–64) and 28 out of the 38 (73.6%) said they would have the operation again. Overall, the long-term results of the 1st MTPJ fusion had good outcomes with a successful fusion rate and minimal complications, both in line with the corresponding literature. In this series, fusion provided high patient satisfaction with the majority of patients opting to undergo fusion with the gift of hindsight

First Metatarsophalangeal joint fusion has been successfully used to treat Hallux rigidus. We have attempted to evaluate commonly used methods of fixation and joint preparation. To the best of our knowledge, this is the single largest comparative study on first MTPJ fusion. We aimed to evaluate the radiological union and revision rates. We included 409 consecutive MTPJ fusions performed in 385 patients. We collected demographic, comorbidities and complication data. We evaluated the radiographs for the status of the union. Logistic regression was used to calculate the Odds ratio (OR) of non-union for the collected variables. Our union rate was 91.4% (34/409). 29.4% of our non-unions were symptomatic (10/34). Hallux valgus showed a statistically significant relation to non-union (Odds ratio 9.33, p-value 0.017). Other potential contributing factors like sex (OR1.9, p-value 0.44), diabetes (OR 0, p-value 0.99), steroid use (OR 2.07, p-value 0.44), inflammatory arthritis (OR 0, p-value 0.99) and smoking (OR 2.69, p-value 0.34) did not attain statistical significance. Further, the methods of fixation like solid screws (OR 0, p-value 0.99), plate (OR 3.6, p-value 0.187) or cannulated screws (OR 0.09, p-value 0.06) showed no correlation with non-union. We compared two techniques of joint preparation and found no significant difference in union rates (Chi-Square 1.0426, p-value 0.30). Our crude cost comparison showed the average saving to the trust per year could be 33,442.50£ by choosing screws over plate. Only Hallux Valgus had a statistically significant relation to non-union. Solid screw could be economically the most viable option and a valid alternative

Introduction:. Techniques devised for 1. st. MTPJ arthrodesis have been described since 1979 when Humbert et al published a ‘tongue and trough’ technique. Common contemporary techniques include fixation with single or crossed screws, or dorsal plates and these are suitable for a variety of indications. All three contemporary techniques have demonstrated a wide range of fusion rates. This study reports a comparison of non-union rates of the 1. st. metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) with the current Memometal Anchorage™ dorsal plate system and the previous Hallu-fix™ and Charlotte™ systems. Methods:. Between 01/2009 and 07/2012 174 consecutive 1. st. MTPJ fusions were performed for 153 patients (Mean age 62, range 42 to 83) by three surgeons at one University teaching hospital. 40 patients (23%) were male and 132 (77%) female. Patients without available radiographs were excluded from the study. 20 patients received Hallu-fix™ plates, 76 Charlotte™ plates and 76 Memometal Anchorage™. Radiographs of the feet were taken from four weeks postoperatively and reviewed for incomplete bone bridging and increased radiolucency around screws. Results:. 12 (7.0%) non-unions were identified in total during followup. A single (5.0%) Hallu-fix™ system, 9 (11.8%) Charlotte™ systems and 2 (2.6%) Memometal Anchorage™ plating systems did not develop a satisfactory fusion. Typical followup in patients in whom there were no postoperative complications and who developed satisfactory bony union was 12 weeks. Those with non-unions were followed until revision procedures were successful. Conclusion:. The total non-union rate of this centre during the period compares favourably with published literature suggesting the technique is suitable for numerous indications in 1. st. MTPJ fusion. With a non-union rate of 5.0%, the Hallu-fix™ shows favourable results when compared authors using the same system. The Charlotte™ system demonstrated an 11.8% non-union rate, comparing poorly with published literature. The Memometal Anchorage™ system, with a non-union rate of 2.6%, demonstrated promising results

Introduction. The aim of this study was to identify the effects of first MTPJ arthritis, ankle arthritis and hallux valgus on patient reported outcomes, and to assess the efficacy of surgery. Methods. Patients who underwent first MTPJ fusion, ankle fusion or hallux valgus correction from July 2013 to October 2014 were included in the study. Exclusion criteria included revision or simultaneous bilateral surgery, inflammatory arthropathy, or arthritis of a proximal joint awaiting arthroplasty. Subjects completed the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOX-FQ), EQ-5D index, and EQ-5D health scale on presentation and at least six months post-operatively. Between group statistical analysis was carried out using one-way ANOVA, pre- and post-operative scores were compared using a paired t-test. Results. Eighty-two patients completed pre-operative questionnaires. Seventy-four (22 male, 52 female) of these (90%) completed post-operative questionnaires at a median of 10 months (range 6–17 months). The median age was 64 years (range 36–85 years). Pre-operative MOX-FQ and EQ-5D scores differed significantly between the groups (both p< 0.001) with ankle fusion patients reporting the worst scores and hallux valgus patients the best. Post-operative MOX-FQ and EQ-5D did not differ between groups (p=0.52, p=0.06 respectively). MOX-FQ significantly improved in all groups from pre-operatively (MTPJ p=0.0001; Ankle p=0.0002; Hallux Valgus p< 0.0001). EQ-5D only statistically improved following surgery for arthritic conditions (MTPJ p< 0.001; ankle p< 0.001; Hallux valgus p=0.06). The EQ-5D health scale did not show any differences between the groups either pre- or post-operatively, nor between pre- and post-op scores for each type of surgery. Conclusions. MOX-FQ and EQ-5D scores differ between patients with different foot and ankle pathologies. Both scores significantly improve following surgery for arthritic conditions, but only the more specific MOX-FQ improves following hallux valgus correction. These results will be of benefit when consenting patients pre-operatively, and potentially for prioritisation of healthcare provision

Recent Department of Health guidelines have recommended that bunion surgery should be performed as a day case in a bid to reduce hospital costs, yet concurrently improving patient outcomes. Following an audit in 2012/3, we implemented a number of measures in a bid to improve the rates of day case first ray surgery. In this paper, we look to see if these measures were effective in reducing the length of stay in first ray surgery. We performed a prospective case note review of all patients undergoing first ray surgery between 01/01/2012 and 01/02/2013, and found the rates of same day discharge in this group to be lower than expected at just 24.19%. We recognised that the most commonly cited reasons for delayed discharge were that patients not being assessed by physiotherapy, and were unable to have their take home medication (TTO's) dispensed as pharmacy had closed. To address this, we implemented a pre-operative therapy led foot school, and organised ward analgesia packs which may be dispensed by ward staff, thus bypassing the need for pharmacy altogether. Together, we coined the term “care package” for these measures. We then performed a post implementation audit between 01/01/2014 to 01/01/2015 to ascertain if these measures had been effective. We identified 62 first ray procedures in the preliminary audit, with an average age of 50.5 years (range 17–78 years) and a M:F ratio of 1:5. The most commonly performed procedures were Scarf osteotomy, 1st MTPJ fusion, and distal Chevron osteotomy. We compared this to 63 first ray procedures post implementation of the care package. The average age was 55.3 years (range 15–78 years) and the M:F ratio was 1:2.5, and there was a similar distribution in terms of specific procedures. We found the length of stay had reduced from 1.00 to 0.65 days (p= 0.0363), and the rate of same day discharge had increased from 24.6% to 44.6% (p= 0.0310). We also noted that St Helens Hospital (SHH), the dedicated day case surgery unit, had a significantly increased rate of same day discharge than Whiston Hospital (WH- the main hospital) at 87.5% and 28.89% respectively (p= 0.0002). Preoperative physiotherapy assessment is an important tool in reducing length of stay for first ray surgery. The use ward analgesia packs has a synergistic effecting in increasing day case first ray surgery. We therefore commend its use to other centers. Additionally, we have shown dedicated day case surgery units are more effective at achieving same day discharge than general hospitals

Introduction: An osteotomy in the proximal first metatarsal corrects the metatarsal head position with much less movement of the fragment than an equivalent distal osteotomy. Most described techniques are technically demanding and reported complications including non-union, mal-union and transfer pain. We present our results of an opening wedge osteotomy with a medial wedge plate. We also present the pitfalls and tips to avoid complications. Materials and Methods: Thirty-four procedures in 30 patients were performed using the Arthrex wedge plate. Demographic and clinical data, AOFAS scores and radiological measurements of standardised radiographs were collected for all the patients. Results: All patients were females. The average age was 52 years. Twenty-seven were primary procedures and 7 patients had had previous, failed 1st ray surgery. No bone graft was used. Thirty-two feet showed clinical and radiological signs of union. Four complications occurred and one was treated with metatarsophalangeal joint fusion. One had an infection. Two patients had broken screws. The average hallux valgus angle and inter-metatarsal angle corrections were 200 and 90 respectively. Average increase in AOFAS scores: preoperative 47 to postoperative 81. Discussion: The spacer in the plate acts as a pillar and obviates the need for a bony strut. Keeping an intact lateral cortex and preventing any shaft displacement was important in avoiding transfer pain. 4.5mm or smaller plates appear to have fewer problems and better scores, al though this was statistically unproven. Screw breakage in the absence of infection had no bearing on overall outcome. Some patients with poor fixation may benefit from non-weight bearing for the first 6 weeks. Conclusion: The wedge plate osteotomy is a powerful tool to correct moderate to severe hallux valgus. It does not need additional bone graft and has a favorable clinical and radiological outcome. The prelude to optimum result was meticulous technique avoiding the discussed pit falls

Cheilectomy of the big toe is offered in the early stages of arthritis affecting the big toe MTPJ, with the understanding that if it fails then a more definitive surgical treatment (e.g. MTPJ fusion or replacement) may be required. When considering treatment options, patients want to know how long will a cheilectomy procedure last. There is limited evidence available about the long term results after cheliectomy, particularly with regards to time to revision surgery. Our aim was to establish the long-term results of cheilectomy with regards to revision surgery and patient-satisfaction over a period of 10 years. A retrospective review of big toe MTPJ cheilectomies was performed at our institute from 2002 to 2012. The patients were identified using a combination of medical coding system, clinical records, operative log, and radiographs. A systemic review of chielectomy by Roukis (2010) was identified as the clinical standard and revision surgery after cheilectomy, average time to revision and patient satisfaction was assessed. 204 cheilectomies were identified in 192 patients over a period of 10 years. Majority had grade 2 OA (n = 106, 54 %) with grade 3 (n= 65, 33 %) and grade 1 (n= 24, 12 %). The mean follow-up was 4 yrs. (range 6 m to 9 yrs. and 8 m). The overall revision rate to any surgery was 4.4% (n=9), and revision to MTPJ arthrodesis was 3.4% (n =7). The average time to revision was 1 yr. 4 m. 101 patients (55%) were contactable over the phone, and majority (82 %) of them were satisfied with the clinical outcome. This study shows slightly better overall revision rate (4.4% vs. 8.8%), with revision to arthrodesis being similar (3.4% vs. 3.25%) as compared to the clinical standard. It also suggests that cheilectomy of the big toe can last for a minimum of up to 4 years in 95 % of cases. The 5 % of cases that may require revision surgery are likely to present within the first 2 years. This information is very useful to a patient who wants to know “how long will my cheilectomy last?” whilst making an informed choice

Introduction: Arthrodesis of 1st MTPJ is performed using various fixation techniques including lag screws, dorsal plate and screws, K-wiring. We evaluated the strength of fixation using two staples placed at right angles. Methods: Ten pairs of cadaveric feet were dissected to harvest the hallux MTPJ. Planar cut of articular surfaces using a micro-saggital saw. The bony ends were then approximated with an intervening blade and fixed using 2 staples placed at right angles. The specimen was supported on either ends and subjected to 3 point loading using a materials testing machine (Instron). The load at which the joint opened up sufficiently to let the blade fall was recorded. The load at which the construct failed was then recorded. Results: The joint opened up at an average of 41 Newtons. The load to failure was 130 Newtons. The corresponding average values in kilograms were 4.19 kilograms for the opening of the joint and 12.61 kilograms for the failure of the construct. On full weight bearing using the heel weight bearing shoes that we normally use post-operatively, the forces going through the forefoot were 0 newtons/kilograms, calculated using a TEK SCAN (measures the foot pressure on walking). Conclusion: It is safe to walk patients using a heel weight bearing shoe (Benefoot post op wedge shoe) following 1st MTPJ fusion using staples (uniclip-NewDeal). This is a major advantage compared to other methods of fixation that require plaster cast immobilisation thus reducing inconvenience, plaster expenses and possible complications like DVT

Twenty-four patients with 26 symptomatic recurrences of deformity after previous hallux valgus procedures were included in this study. Exclusion criteria were hallux metatarsophalangeal joint fusion, Keller/Mayo procedures, insulin-dependent diabetes, previous ankle or subtalar fusions, peripheral vascular disease or peripheral neuropathy. An AAOS Foot and Ankle Outcomes Data Collection questionnaire, a Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAPS), and the AOFAS Hallux Metatarsopha-langeal Interphalangeal Scale (HMIS) were administered preoperatively, at six months and then annually. Weight-bearing radiographs were taken preoperatively, at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months. The mean follow-up was 21.6 months (6 to 36). At final follow-up, the mean HMIS scores increased from 47.5 to 87.8 and the mean VAPS improved from 6.2 to 1.3. The mean hallux valgus angle improved from 37° to 14° and the mean intermetatarsal angle improved from 18° to 7°. In 77%, patients were very satisfied, in 4% satisfied, and in 19% somewhat satisfied.There were no cases of hallux varus. Complications included three nonunions, all of which occurred in smokers, and two superficial wound infections. In appropriately selected patients, the Lapidus procedure is a reliable and effective alternative for failed hallux valgus surgery

Shape memory phenomenon whereby the metal changes its characteristics depending on the ambient temperature it is exposed to is well described in the metallurgical literature. In cold conditions (0–5° C) the alloy becomes plastically deformable and its shape can be changed at will, but would rapidly regain its original shape and strength at higher temperatures. This study assesses the effectiveness of shape memory staples as a method of internal fixation in foot and ankle surgery. All patients who underwent foot and ankle surgery in which Memory® staples were used for fixation were included in the study. The patients were evaluated with regard to period of immobilisation in cast, period of restricted weight bearing and time to radiological joint fusion or union of osteotomy. Memory® staples had been used in a total of 40 procedures; 13 procedures (6 MTPJ fusions, 7 Akin osteotomies) were done in the forefoot while the rest were carried out in the mid or hind foot. Bone grafting was used only in one hind foot arthrodesis. A strong arthrodesis or union was achieved in all the patients. The average time to fusion was 7.2 weeks (range 6–12) with an average period of immobilisation of 4.3 weeks (range 0–12). The average time to full weight bearing was 5.2 weeks (range 0–6). Breakage of the staple was noticed in one patient but the joint went on to unite satisfactorily. Staple back out or displacement was not noticed in any of the cases. The early experience with the use Memory® staples in foot and ankle surgery is encouraging; we did not encounter any technical problems and there is a suggestion that these implants may reduce the time to fusion/ healing thereby reducing the recovery time following foot and ankle surgery

Materials and Methods: Consecutive 39 patients who underwent first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) arthrodesis for hallux rigidus were assessed clinically, radiographically and functionally at a mean follow up of 21.45 months. Clinical assessment was performed by two blinded assessors in a specially arranged research clinic. Radiological examinations were performed separately by two independent researchers on digitalised weight bearing radiographs. Functional outcome was assessed using American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hallux score and a short form-12 (SF-12) questionnaire. Results: There were 19 patients who had dorsal contoured titanium plates and 20 patients who had single inter fragmentary screw fixation. Both the groups were comparable preoperatively. All except 5 patients achieved radiological fusion at a mean of 7.64 weeks. Over all rate of fusion in the present series is 87.1%. There were 4 non-unions in the plate group and one in screw group. Mean AOFAS score was 74.94 in the screw group and 70.63 in the plate group. There were no hardware problems in the single screw group. However in the plate group one patient with non-union broke the plate and another patient had back out of screws. There were no statistically significant differences in terms of pain-relief, activity-limitation, cosmetic appearance, foot wear requirements, dorsiflexion angle, hallux-valgus angle and inclination angles and SF 12 scores. Four patients in the plate group and one in screw group were unsatisfied with the surgery. Conclusions: Solid fusion has resulted in good pain relief and patient satisfaction in both groups. In the dorsal plate group 4 patients (21.6%) had non-unions, two patients had metal problems. We have stopped using the plate alone technique for the fixation of first MTPJ fusion

INTRODUCTION. Warfarin remains the treatment of choice for the majority of patients with venous thromboembolism, atrial fibrillation and valvular heart disease or valve replacement unless contraindicated. Poor management of patients on warfarin often leads to delay in surgery, life threatening bleeding during or after operation and unnecessary delay in discharge from hospitals in United Kingdom. METHODS. We carried out a prospective study on patients who were on warfarin and underwent elective and emergency orthopaedic procedures during period of study- August 2007 to April 2008. All patients included in the study were identified from admission notes during period of study. All data regarding indications for warfarin, pre and post procedures INR, elective or emergency orthopaedic procedures and complications were collected using a standard proforma. RESULTS. 18 patients, 12 male and 6 female were included into the study. Patients' age ranged from 47-87 with mean of 76. The indications for warfarin therapy were atrial fibrillation in 12 patients, deep vein thrombosis in 5 patients and left ventricular aneurysm in 1 patient. 18 procedures, 10 elective and 8 emergency orthopaedic procedures were carried out during period of study. Elective procedures - 7 primary joint arthroplasty, 1 revision hip arthroplasty, 1 removal of metalwork and 1 metatarsophalangeal joint fusion. Emergency procedures - 4 hip hemiarthroplasty, 2 dynamic hip screw fixation, 1 external fixator application and 1 open reduction and internal fixation of ankle. All elective admission patients were pre-assessed in clinic prior to admission and were advised to stop warfarin based on their INR level. Patients with INR 2-3 had their warfarin stopped 4 days prior to surgery while patients with INR 3-4.5 had their warfarin stopped 5 days prior to surgery. This group of patients had their INR check on admission and ranged from 1.1-1.5. This group of patients had no reversal therapy and no cancellations were made to their operation. 8 emergency admission patients had INR of 1.4-4.7 on admission with mean of 2.7. 5 patients had reversal therapy while 3 patients had no reversal therapy. Pharmacological methods used to reduce the INR were fresh frozen plasma in 1 patient and Vitamin K in 4 other patients. 2 patients that received reversal therapy had operation on day 1, 2 on day 3 and 1 on day 5. 1 patient that had no reversal therapy was operated on day 1, 1 on day 3 and 1 on day 5. Patient that received no reversal therapy and operated on day 5 of admission died post-operatively from medical complications. Mean delay for patient that had reversal therapy was 2.2 days compared to 3 days in patient with no reversal therapy. All patients in this study had prophylactic low molecular weight heparin while off warfarin. Patients were recommenced on their normal dose of warfarin the day after their operation. DISCUSSION & CONCLUSIONS. We conclude that patients on warfarin with INR 2-3 should have their warfarin stopped 4 days prior to surgery while patients with INR 3-4.5 should stop their warfarin 5 days prior to elective surgery. Trauma patients on warfarin requiring operation should have their INR reversed on admission to shorten delay in waiting time and improve outcomes

Aims

To evaluate safety outcomes and patient satisfaction of the re-introduction of elective orthopaedic surgery on ‘green’ (non-COVID-19) sites during the COVID-19 pandemic.