Patients with Neuromuscular disorders who have an arthritic hip joint present unique challenges. Due to inadequate bone stock, bony deformity and muscle imbalance there is a potentially increased risk of dislocation. These patients who have undergone conventional total hip replacement in the past, have been immobilised post-operatively in a hip spica to prevent post-op dislocation. Large heads are inherently more stable and adequately treat these patients, without the need for post-operative immobilisation. We present our experience with large head replacement in this group of patients. Eight patients, five with cerebral palsy, two with Down’s Syndrome and one with Cornelia de large Syndrome, who underwent total hip replacement with a large head prosthesis were reviewed. Their average age was 44.5 years and patients were followed up for maximum 51 months. Patients were assessed with respect to pre- and post-op pain, mobility and function. Hip scores have not been found to be useful in assessing these patients. Two Birmingham Surface replacements were used and six large heads on conventional stems, with large uncemented cups. In all patients there was improvement in pain and function. Four patients had improvement in their ambulatory status. In none did this worsen. Despite no post-operative immobilisation, there was only on dislocation. This was due to error in cup positioning, an error in the early learning curve. Despite the small numbers and short follow up, we feel that large head replacement is a viable alternative to conventional hip replacement in these difficult cases

The use of modular systems adds versatility to the implant system, better restoration of hip biomechanics and lower inventory to the hospital. There have been reports of high metal ions, ARMD reactions and high implant failure rates due to potential problems from taper failures. These are more common in metal-on-metal hip replacements, but are being also reported in other bearings. Between 2001 and 2010, we performed 383 consecutive metal-on-metal (MoM) THRs through a posterior approach, using a BHR cup and Birmingham modular head with one of three different stems, all with 12/14 tapers. The earliest 104 hips employed a cemented MS30 stem (Zimmer GmbH, Winterthur, Switzerland). Subsequent 256 were Synergy and then 23 Anthology (both uncemented and both Smith and Nephew Orthopaedics, Memphis TN USA). There was no significant difference in the average age at surgery (65.4 years cemented vs 65.6 uncemented, p = 0.69), gender ratio (1.68 vs 1.89, p = 0.64), or bearing diameter (46.7 vs 46.8, p = 0.31). The earlier 203 Synergy stems were monoblock heads, while the remaining uncemented stems included a tapered sleeve in addition. There were 3 deep infections and 11 debris-related failures (overall revision rate 4.9%). The revision rate from aseptic failures (ALTR, effusion, osteolysis or component loosening) is 2.87%. Kaplan-Meier analysis of the entire cohort showed a 10-year implant survival of 96.8% with revision for any reason as the end-point. Cemented stems had a 100% survival at 10 years and 98.6% at 12 years. The uncemented stems had a 93.8% survival at 10 years. Within the uncemented group, the monoblocks had a 5 and 10-year survival of 99.0% and 96.4% respectively while the sleeved had 98.7% (5 years) and 96.3% (7 years) and 82.5% at 8 years. Retreival analysis showed clear evidence of taper failure. Our experience suggests taper failure leading to ALTRs and its sequelae. Others have reported ALTR type reactions in metal on polyethylene and ceramic on polyethylene bearing types as well in bearing diameters ranging from 28mm to 40mm. There is a need to improve taper design especially for use with large heads, and in high demand patients

Pseudotumour formation is being reported with increasing frequency in failing metal-on-metal hip resurfacings and replacements. This mode of failure complication has also been reported with metal-on-polyethylene bearing bearings when it is usually associated with evidence of surface corrosion and no apparent wear at the head–neck taper. We present a case with evidence of taper wear and damage secondary to corrosion in an uncemented total hip replacement with a metal on polyethylene articulation (TMZF (Titanium, Molybdenum, Zirconium and Ferrous) Accolade® stem, Trident® HA coated acetabular shell, Low Friction Ion Treatment (LFIT™) Cobalt-Chrome anatomic head (40 mm), X3® polyethylene liner). Case. A 69 year old woman had a THR in 2008. A year later she started to complain of lateral based hip pain. Clinical examination and initial imaging indicated trochanteric bursitis and heterotopic bone formation. The symptoms became worse over the next 3 years and the patient was listed for exploration and excision of heterotopic bone. Surgical findings. Extensive pseudotumour was encountered deep to bursa and adherent to capsule. Abductors, external rotators and vastus lateralis were spared. There was minimal calcar osteolysis and marginal erosion in superior acetabulum. There was no obvious wear on the articulating surfaces of the femoral head and polyethylene inlay of the socket nor was there any evidence of neck-to-rim impingement or edge loading. There was visible blackening of both the taper and trunnion after femoral head removal. Results. Peripheral blood samples taken at the time of surgery recorded Cobalt 107 nmol/L, Chromium 9 nmol/L. Wear Measurements. These were performed on the articulating surfaces and the head taper using the RedLux Artificial Hip Profiler. No discernable wear was noted at the articulating surfaces. Qualitative 3-D surface mapping demonstrated a trunnion imprint on head taper of 10.1 mm in length. At the distal end of the taper this was incomplete indicating possible taper/trunnion incongruity. The majority of the material loss was demonstrated at the proximal end on the polar opposite side to incomplete imprint (Figure 1). Corrosion analysis. The head was sectioned for more detailed surface analysis of areas of interest. This demonstrated a polished region just inside the taper (G), followed by a deep pit (F), a region of extensive pitting (E) and running along the taper length were longitudinal needle like pits (D) indicative of a path of fluid ingress (D-G ref Fig 2.). These findings were more suggestive of crevice corrosion than mechanical wear. Histology. There was evidence of aseptic lymphocytic vasculitis-associated lesion (ALVAL) scoring 8 out of 10 (as per Campbell et al). With the continuing increase in the use of larger head sizes the findings of pseudotumour formation and taper damage in a commonly used hip replacement raises considerable concern. Wear analysis has highlighted that although there is evidence of motion occurring at the taper / trunnion interface, corrosion appears to be the dominant mechanism of damage to the taper. In addition to the use of larger head sizes this case also raise concerns about the compatibility of certain metal alloy combinations

Purpose: Several studies have shown elevated levels of metal ions in blood of patients with metal-on-metal (MM) total hip arthroplasty (THA). To minimize wear, the elastohydrodynamic theory suggests wear reduction for larger diameter head bearings. This significant reduction in wear has been demonstrated in hip simulators for the 36 mm-head compared to the 28 mm-head prosthesis. However, the survival of larger head MM THAs and the levels of metal ions in the blood of patients having these implants are still to be determined. Method: Fifty (50) patients (56 hips) who received a DePuy Ultamet™ MM hip bearing (40/44 mm-head) at our Institution between July 1st 2007 and August 31st 2008 were included in the study. Clinical and radiologic data were collected pre-operatively as well as at 6–8 weeks, 4–6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. Results were compared to those of subjects (65 patients, 71 hips) who received a 36 mm-head prosthesis. Cobalt (Co) and chromium (Cr) concentrations were measured at 1 year post-operatively in the blood of patients by ICP-MS. Since Co and Cr ions have the potential to induce irreversible biochemical damage to macromolecules, the levels of oxidative stress markers (total antioxidants and lipid peroxides) were measured in the plasma of these patients. Results: At their 1-year post-operatively follow-ups, all patients were doing well and no sign of osteolysis was observed on X-rays. Harris Hip Score increased in both groups with a tendency to higher score in the 40–44 mm group compared to the 36 mm group. Activity score also increased in both groups after 1 year without statistical significant differences. Results also show that the levels of Co and Cr ions increased significantly in both groups compared to the Pre-OP control group. The levels of Co were also significantly higher in patients with large head arthroplasty (40 and 44 mm-head) compared to those of the 36 mm-head group (p=0.012). The levels of Cr were similar in both the large head and the 36 mm-head group (p=0.41). Finally, results show that there were no differences in the levels of total antioxidants and peroxides between the 40–44 mm group and the 36 mm group. Moreover, there was no increase in the level of these markers of oxidative stress compared to the Pre-OP control group. Conclusion: The present study shows that at 1-year postoperatively, patients with large 40–44 mm-head THA had comparable clinical outcomes than those with 36 mm-head prosthesis. However, the levels of Co ions were significantly higher in these patients compared to patients with 36 mm-head THA. This suggests a higher health risk for these patients due to the presence of these ions. However, there were no effects on the levels of oxidative stress markers in the blood of these patients, suggesting that there is no increased risk at short-term. In conclusion, due to the high level of Co ions, longer follow-ups are required to conclusively determine the outcomes of the patients and the survivorship of these new bearings

Material loss at the head-stem taper junction may contribute to the high early failure rates of stemmed large head metal-on-metal (LH-MOM) hip replacements. We sought to quantify both wear and corrosion and by doing so determine the main mechanism of material loss at the taper. This was a retrospective study of 78 patients having undergone revision of a LH-MOM hip replacement. All relevant clinical data was recorded. Corrosion was assessed using light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy, and graded according to a well-published classification system. We then measured the volumetric wear of the bearing and taper surfaces. Evidence of at least mild taper corrosion was seen in 90% cases, with 46% severely corroded. SEM confirmed the presence of corrosion debris, pits and fretting damage. However, volumetric wear of the taper surfaces was significantly lower than that of the bearing surfaces (p = 0.015). Our study supports corrosion as the predominant mechanism of material loss at the taper junction of LH-MOM hip replacements. Although the volume of material loss is low, the ionic products may be more biologically active compared to the particulate debris arising from the bearing surfaces

Purpose. To determine whether there is a difference in the metal ion levels among three different metal-on-metal total hip systems: two monoblock large heads and one modular metal-on-metal total hip replacement system in patients who received these implants in our region. Method. A group of 56 patients were recruited that had either undergone total hip replacement (THR) with a Birmingham resurfacing socket, the Durom resurfacing socket, or a Pinnacle metal-on-metal bearing surface. All patients recruited were at least one year following their surgery in order that their ion levels had reached a steady state. We reviewed every patient clinically, radiographically as well as biochemically. Blood was obtained for cobalt (Co) and chromium (Cr) levels. Current radiographs were arranged to assess the stability and mechanics of the total hip systems. All patients signed an informed consent and completed three questionnaires, The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) index, the Short Form 36 (SF36) and UCLA activity score. A Harris Hip score was completed in order to assess individual hip function. Statistical analysis was performed on the collected data to assess whether there were any other potential influence on the mean levels of Co and Cr. Results. The blood metal ion levels in the larger non modular acetabular sockets were significantly raised compared to the Pinnacle group. For Co, 1.95 parts per billion (ppb) and 2.70 ppb in the Durom and Birmingham groups respectively compared to only 0.52 ppb in the Pinnacle group (P< 0.001). Cr levels were the same in the two monoblock systems, 1.9 ppb compared to the Pinnacle sockets 1.2 ppb (P<0.001). In all groups however these levels were within an acceptable safe range. The mean head size used in the Birmingham group was 53.2mm (Range 44mm to 56mm), and in the Durom group, 47.1 (Range 42 to 54mm). The mean head size used in the modular group was 37.3mm (Range 36–44mm). There was no difference between the three groups in terms of functional outcome and patient demographics were similar in all three groups. There was no statistical difference between the groups in terms of anteversion and abduction angles. There was also a smaller spread in this group in terms of range of angles. There was also no relationship between these values and the metal ion levels. Conclusion. All three total hip systems demonstrated average metal ion whole blood levels in a safe range. Larger diameter metal on metal bearings had higher ion levels

Introduction: Although good mid-term results have been reported with some metal on metal hip replacements, reported complications due to metal on metal (MOM) related reactions are a cause for concern. We have assessed the clinical outcome and MRI metallic artefact reduction sequence (MARS) findings in a consecutive series of patients with a large head metal on metal hip replacement. Methods: 62 ASR XL Corail THRs and 17 ASR resurfacings were performed at our hospital between 2005 and 2008. All patients were reviewed and assessed with an Oxford hip score (OHS), a plain radiograph and a MRI imaging was obtained on 76 (96%) hips. Implant position was assessed using Wrightington cup orientation software. Results: At a mean follow up of 32 months, 9 (15%) ASR XL Corail THRs, and 2(12%) ASR resurfacings had been revised. 10 revisions were performed for MRI confirmed MOM related pathology. Histology confirmed a MOM reaction in all 10 cases. Of the 76 hips that were MRI scanned, 27 (36%) had typical features of a MOM reaction. These were classified as mild in 10 (13%), moderate in 13 (17%) and severe in 4 (5%). 78 patients completed an OHS and the mean score was 21. The mean OHS was 29 pre-operatively in those that had been revised, 25 in patients with abnormal MRI findings and 20 in those with a normal MRI. 10 patients with abnormal MRIs had a near perfect OHS (15 or less). Conclusions: The ASR XL Corail THR has an unacceptably high early failure rate. MARS MRI is able to detect metal debris related soft tissue pathology around metal on metal THRs. These lesions are sometimes asymptomatic. We suggest that MARS MRI evaluation should form part of the routine evaluation of all metal on metal THRs, and in particular of this implant

It has been speculated that high wear at the head-stem taper may contribute to the high failure rates reported for stemmed large head metal-on-metal (LH-MOM) hips. In this study of 53 retrieved LH-MOM hip replacements, we sought to determine the relative contributions of the bearing and taper surfaces to the total wear volume. Prior to revision, we recorded the relevant clinical variables, including whole blood cobalt and chromium levels. Volumetric wear of the bearing surfaces was measured using a coordinate measuring machine and of the taper surfaces using a roundness measuring machine. The mean taper wear volume was lower than the combined bearing surface wear volume (p = 0.015). On average the taper contributed 32.9% of the total wear volume, and in only 28% cases was the taper wear volume greater than the bearing surface wear volume. Despite contributing less to the total material loss than the bearing surfaces, the head-stem taper junction remains an important source of implant-derived wear debris. Furthermore, material loss at the taper is likely to involve corrosion and it is possible that the material released may be more biologically active than that from the bearing surface

Introduction: We hypothesised that a stemmed hybrid total hip replacement with a large metal head, (LMOM), with the same bearing technology, would give early functional results as good as hip resurfacing (HR) with fewer contraindications and reduced morbidity due to a less invasive approach. Methods: We performed a 12 month observational study of consecutive patients undergoing LMOM (n=40) and HR (n=60). Patients’ age, sex, blood loss, hospital stay and early complications were compared as well as pre and post-op Oxford scores and range of movement. Results: The HR group was younger with more normal hip morphology. Mean age 54years HR/ 59years LMOM, BMI 28 and 29 respectively. Diagnosis of primary osteoarthritis 77% HR compared to 47% in LMOM group. Operation time, blood loss and haemoglobin drop were similar in both groups. The LMOM group achieved an earlier discharge of 5.5 days compared to 6.3 (p< 0.12). Complications included 2 aseptic wound leakages in the LMOM group. In the HR group an aseptic wound leakage, superficial infection and a sciatic nerve palsy was observed. At 6 week and 3 month follow up, the range of moment of both groups was very similar. Mean Oxford hip scores were 44 preoperatively and 22 postoperatively in the HR group and 45 falling to 24 in the LMOM group. Discussion: LMOM compared to HR is preferable in respect to hospital stay and reduced perioperative complications despite an older cohort with a wider variety of arthritic pathologies. However longer follow up is required to conclude further

Introduction. Although good mid-term results have been reported with some metal on metal hip replacements, reported complications due to metal on metal (MOM) related reactions are a cause for concern. We have assessed the early clinical outcome and results of routine metal artefact reduction MRI findings in a consecutive series of patients with a modern large head metal on metal hip replacement. Methods. 62 ASR XL Corail total hip replacements (THR) and 17 ASR resurfacings were performed at our hospital between 2005 and 2008. All patients were reviewed and assessed with an Oxford hip score (OHS), a plain radiograph and a MRI imaging was obtained on 76 (96%) hips. Implant position was assessed using Wrightington cup orientation software. Results. At a mean follow-up of 32 months, 8 ASR XL Corail THRs had been revised. 6 revisions were performed for MRI-confirmed MOM-related pathology. Histology confirmed a MOM reaction in all 6 cases. Of the 76 hips that were MRI scanned, 27 (36%) had typical features of a MOM reaction. These were classified as mild in 5 (7%), moderate in 18 (24%) and severe in 4 (5%). 78 patients completed an OHS and the mean score was 21. The mean OHS was 37 pre-operatively in those that had been revised, 19 in patients with abnormal MRI findings and 23 in those with a normal MRI. 10 patients with abnormal MRIs had a near perfect OHS (15 or less). Conclusion. The ASR XL Corail THR has an unacceptably high early failure rate. MRI detected metal debris related soft tissue related reactions were very common and often asymptomatic. We recommend that patients with this implant should be closely followed up and undergo routine metal artefact reduction MRI screening

Introduction: The aim of this study is to investigate whether MoM implants result in more chromosome aberrations and increased blood metal ions post-operatively when compared to MoP implants. Large head metal-on-metal articulating surfaces of the hip are being used in increasing numbers of patients for oncological purposes due to the increased stability and reduced dislocation rate. Recent studies have raised many concerns over possible genotoxicity of MoM implants. Methods: This is a prospective study of patients who have undergone elective total hip replacement. Patients were randomised into two groups (MoP and MoM). Patients are reviewed pre-operatively (control group), at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years post-operatively. On each occasion blood tests are taken to quantify metal ion levels (chromium, cobalt, titanium, nickel and vanadium) using HR-ICPMS and chromosome aberrations in T lymphocytes using 24 colour fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH). Results: 24 patients had MoP prosthesis and 29 a MoM. Cobalt and chromium concentration increased during the first 6 months in both MoM and MoP groups, in the MoM group the chromium levels were twice that of MoP group and 12x that of the preoperative samples. There was no difference with the levels of titanium, nickel and vanadium. Chromosome aberrations occurred in both groups. At 6 months both the MoM and MoP groups showed increase frequency of aneuploidy aberrations with further increases after one year. Structural damage in the form of translocations occurred in the MoM group after one year, but not in the MoP group. Discussion: Results of this study show that the levels of chromium and cobalt are significantly higher in the MoM group compared to the MoP group. This corresponds to increases in chromosome aberrations between the groups particularly in aneuploidy and translocations present in the MoM group at 1 year

The reintroduction of hip resurfacing has raised the possibility of whether it could offer a better outcome in sporting and work activity after surgery compared to total hip replacement.

Questionnaires were analysed from 125 total hip replacement (THR) and 108 hip resurfacing (HR) patients regarding participation in sport in the year after their surgery and returning to work they were employed at prior to their surgery. The two groups had similar average age (61 vs 60) and pre-operative Oxford hip scores (41 vs 38).

Seventy-one of one-hundred and twenty-five THR patients compared to 76/108 HR patients participated in sporting activity in the year after their surgery. When including only patients that played sport before their surgery 54/75 THR and 66/83 HR patients returned to same sporting activity level after their surgery. Of the patients that worked before surgery 35/44 THR patients compared to 70/74 HR patients returned work to after their surgery.

There is significant difference quantity of patients participating in sporting activity after HR and THR (fishers exact test, p value=0.04). However there is no significant difference in quantity of patients returning to sporting activity after HR or THR including only patients that played sport before their surgery (fishers exact test, p value=0.35). There is a significant difference in the quantity of patients returning to work activity after HR and THR (fishers exact test, p value= 0.02). HR has a better outcome in patients participating in sport after surgery compared to THR however there is no benefit for patients that are active pre-operatively. More patients return to work after HR than THR.

Introduction:

Large diameter metal on metal total hip arthroplasty (MOM THA) have shorter lengths of implantation due to increased failure caused by wear either at the articulating surface as well as the taper-trunnion interface. Taper-trunnion wear may be worse in large diameter MOM THA due the increased torque at the taper-trunnion interface. However little has been done to understand how differences in taper-trunnion geometry and trunnion engagement effects wear. The purpose of this study was to (1) measure the differences in taper geometry and trunnion engagement on the head-taper of 11/13, 12/14, and Type 1 taper designs and (2) to determine if taper geometry affects fretting, corrosion, and wear at the taper interface.

In a cross sectional cohort study three different metal on metal total hip systems were assessed. Two monoblock acetabular designs; the Durom socket (Zimmer, Warsaw, In) and the Birmingham socket (Smith and Nephew, Memphis, TN), and one modular metal on metal total hip system (Pinnacle, Depuy Orthopaedics, Warsaw, In) in patients who have received these implants in the our region. 56 patients were recruited in total. All patients were assessed clinically, radiologically and biochemically. Whole blood Cobalt, Chromium and titanium levels were tested.

The median head size used in the Birmingham group was 52mm (Range 44mm to 56mm), and in the Durom group, 48mm (Range 42 to 54mm). The median head size used in the modular Pinnacle group was 40mm (Range 36–44mm).

The blood metal ions levels in the larger non modular acetabular sockets were significantly raised compared to the Pinnacle group. For Co 1.95 µg/l and 2.70 µg/l in the Durom and Birmingham groups respectively compared to only 0.52 µg/l in the Pinnacle group (P< 0.001). Mean Cr levels were the same for the two monoblock systems, 1.9 µg/l compared to the Pinnacle sockets 1.2 µg/l (P< 0.001).

Our study clearly demonstrates that there is a significant difference in metal ion levels in patients following a monobloc large head arthroplasty system compared to a smaller modular metal on metal hip arthroplasty. The smaller head size appears to produce less metal ions whilst at the same time a 36mm–44mm head size is large enough to increase hip stability and range of movement as well as decreasing the risk of impingement. In our practice we are no longer using this design and the safest strategy, when considering metal on metal bearings, is to use a modular, smaller head system such as the Pinnacle.

Introduction & aims. Total hip replacement is an excellent treatment option for people with late stage degenerative hip disease. In addition to marked reduction in pain and improvement in sleep, most people regain range of motion, physical ability and quality of life. This study aimed at the functional outcomes of large diameter heads in THR patients. Method. This study is an analysis of a cohort of patients undergoing total hip replacement performed at our hospital from November 2011 to July 2013. A total of 70 hips, 40 males and 30 females, were operated upon with large diameter femoral heads. The mean age was 50.38 years (range 40–59 years). In our cohort, 32 patients had AVN of femur head, 19 had post traumatic secondary degeneration, 10 had RA, 6 had AS and 3 patients had OA of hip. The follow-up data included local complications, Harris Hip Score, medical complications, readmission, activity status and use of a walking aid. Results. Harris hip score at final follow up was, 33 cases had excellent, 26 cases had good result. None of the patient had fair or poor result. Two cases of superficial infection were observed. One case of dislocation was observed in post operative period which was reduced under GA and patient was given abduction brace. The mean follow up was 16.31 months ranging from 6 to 32 months. During the follow up, we had mortality of two patients. One died at 14 months due to myocardial infarction and the cause of other died due to CVA at 10 months follow up. Conclusions. Lower dislocation rate and better range of motion in majority of cases reinforces the advantage of large diameter head in THR in young and active patients. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly (see Info & Metrics tab above).

Aims

Large-diameter metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasty (THA) has demonstrated unexpected high failure rates and pseudotumour formation. The purpose of this prospective cohort study is to report ten-year results in order to establish revision rate, prevalence of pseudotumour formation, and relation with whole blood cobalt levels.

Purpose: Clinical studies still show significant variability in offset and leg length reconstruction after 28mmTHA. Precise restoration of hip biomechanics is important since it reduces wear and improves stability, abductor function and patient satisfaction. There is a tendency to increase offset and leg length to ensure stability of 28mmTHA. This may not be needed with the more stable LDHTHA and hip resurfacing implants, therefore potentially improving the precision of the hip reconstruction. The aim of this study was to verify this assumption. Method: Leg length and femoral offset were measured on standardized digital radiographs with a computer software in 254 patients (49 HR, 74 LDHTHA, 132 28mmTHA) with unilateral hip involvement and compared to the normal contralateral side. Results: Femoral offset was increased in 72% of 28mmTHA (mean +3.3mm), 56% of LDHTHA (mean +1.0mm) and 8% of HR (mean −3.2mm) (intergroup differences p< 0.05). The mean LLI was greater after 28mmTHA (+2,29mm) vs. (−0.45mm for LDHTHA and −1.8mm for HR). The percentage of patients with increased leg length > 4mm was greater for 28mmTHA (11%) compared to LDHTHA (2.7%) and HR (2%). Conclusion: The stability afforded by the larger head of LDHTHA reduces the surgeon’s tendency to increased leg length and femoral offset to avoid instability as during 28mmTHA. In addition, compared to HR, LDHTHA allows more precise restoration of equal leg length and femoral offset in patient with greater pre operative deformities (low femoral offset and LLI > 1cm). LDHTHA may represent the most precise method of hip joint reconstruction

Corrosion at the taper interface between the femoral head and the femoral stem is well described in metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) hips but previously was undetermined in large diameter head metal-on-metal (LHMoM) hips. The high failure rate of the articulating surface replacement (ASR) XL hip system has been partly attributed to susceptibility to corrosive damage at the taper interface. It was not known if other hip manufacturers are liable to taper corrosion. Therefore the aim of this study was to quantify the prevalence and severity of taper corrosion in LHMoM hips and compare corrosion across five different current generation manufacturers. Taper corrosion was analysed in a consecutive series of the five most common hip types at our retrieval centre: ASR XL, DePuy (n=49); Birmingham hip resurfacing, Smith & Nephew (n=33), Durom, Zimmer (n=31), M2a Magnum, Biomet (n=14) and Cormet, Stryker (n=10). A four-scale peer-reviewed qualitative corrosion scoring system was used to quantify corrosion (none, mild, moderate and severe). Evidence of corrosion was observed in 86% of components, with at least moderate corrosion observed in 61%. No difference in corrosion was observed between the ASR XL and the other manufacturers (p=0.202). There was still no difference seen when all manufacturers were compared individually (p=0.363). A positive correlation was observed between corrosion and femoral head diameter (r=0.224, p=0.021). However no relationship was observed with implantation time (r=0.163, p=0.118). Our study indicates that taper corrosion is common in LHMoM hips and affects all hip types equally. The clinical significance of this finding is that all hip types will be susceptible to the complications of corrosion, such as third body wear and osteolysis. Furthermore recent reports indicate that corrosive debris released from the taper interface may play a role in the formation of pseudotumours and adverse soft-tissue reactions. We found that larger femoral head sizes showed greater corrosion, which suggests that high torque increases fretting corrosion of the taper interface. Future work must determine the optimum femoral head size and investigate the chemical composition of the corrosive debris

Introduction: Better clinical outcome is generally reported after hip resurfacing when compared to conventional 28mmTHA. This may simply be the consequences of biased patient selection, patient perception or the advantageous use of larger diameter femoral heads in HR. The true clinical benefits of HR can only be assessed by comparison with LDH-THA in a blinded randomized study to eliminate/reduce those biases. This was the aim of the study. Materials and Methods: Charnley class A patients were randomized between HR or LDH-THA and kept blinded for one year. Clinical data, gait analysis, postural balance evaluations and functional tests were performed preoperatively, at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively. 14 normal patients served as controls. Results: 24 patients were assigned to each group. There was no significant difference in WOMAC, SF-36, activity scores, and patient satisfaction. A slight advantage was observed for HR during the functional reach test (postural balance) and for LDH-THA during the step test (speed, strength and balance), all other tests showing no differences. Both groups quickly reached controls value for all tests by 3 months. Discussion: We have failed to demonstrate a clear difference in outcome between HR and LDH-THA. Both groups fully recovered quickly. The postulated clinical advantages of HR over 28mmTHA most likely result from using a larger head in highly motivated patients. The only clear advantage of HR over LDH-THA remains proximal femoral bone conservation, although with the excellent durability of currently used femoral stems, HR has to demonstrate comparable survivorship before bone conservation is considered a true benefit

Purpose: Better clinical outcome is generally reported after hip resurfacing when compared to conventional 28mmTHA. This may simply be the consequences of biased patient selection, patient perception or the advantageous use of larger diameter femoral heads in HR. The true clinical benefits of HR can only be assessed by comparison with LDH-THA in a blinded randomized study to eliminate/reduce those biases. This was the aim of the study. Method: Charnley class A patients were randomized between HR or LDH-THA and kept blinded for one year. Clinical data, gait analysis, postural balance evaluations and functional tests were performed pre-operatively at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively. Fourteen normal patients served as controls. Results: Twenty-four patients were assigned to each group. There was no significant difference in WOMAC, SF-36, activity scores, and patient satisfaction. A slight advantage was observed for HR during the functional reach test (postural balance) and for LDH-THA during the step test (speed, strength and balance), all other tests showing no differences. Both groups quickly reached controls value for all tests by 3 months. Conclusion: We have failed to demonstrate a clear difference in outcome between HR and LDH-THA. Both groups fully recovered quickly. The postulated clinical advantages of HR over 28mmTHA most likely result from using a larger head in highly motivated patients. The only clear advantage of HR over LDH-THA remains proximal femoral bone conservation, although with the excellent durability of currently used femoral stems, HR has to demonstrate comparable survivorship before bone conservation is considered a true benefit