Total Joint Arthroplasty (TJA) is a successful orthopaedic procedure allowing dramatic clinical and functional improvements. Globally, there's been an increase in demand and performed cases associated with an increase in complications. Subsequently, focus on the prevention of complications has become important worldwide. The incidence of venous-thrombolic events (VTE) despite great attention has not diminished despite much investigation. A balance between efficacy and safety from the available agents is essential. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) has been commonly used, but oral anti-coagulants have become more popular. The aim of this study was to assess the adherence LMWH and the effectiveness and safety of preventing VTE in post-operative arthroplasty patients in a South African setting. We conducted a prospective cohort study that included hip and knee, primary and revision, arthroplasty patients who received thromboprophylaxis with one daily injection of LMWH for 14 days post discharge. Patients who omitted 1 or more doses during the follow up period were classified as “non adherent”. A questionnaire was used at follow up visits at least 6 weeks post-operatively. 100 consecutive patients were followed up. The mean age of patients was 63.45 years. There were 68 % female patients. There was a 92% compliance rate. 60 % of patients had the injection administered by a family member, 38 % administered it themselves and 2 % had the injection administered by health professionals. Venous thromboembolic events were confirmed in 5 % at 7.86 days after surgery. Three patients had persistent wound drainage after surgery, however, none required reoperation or readmission. Compliance with LMWH is high and is comparable with oral agents. It is effective in preventing VTE and safe with regards to bleeding and wound complications in a South African setting. Patient education regarding medications may improve compliance of the medication

Considerable debate exists regarding which agent(s) should be preferred for venous thromboembolism (VTE) chemical prophylaxis following joint replacement. We assessed the practice of surgeons regarding VTE chemical prophylaxis for primary THR and TKR, pre and post issuing of updated NICE guidance in 2018. A survey, circulated through the British Hip Society and regional trainee networks/collaboratives, was completed by 306 UK surgeons at 187 units. VTE chemical prophylaxis prescribing patterns for surgeons carrying out primary THR (n=258) and TKR (n=253) in low-risk patients were assessed post publication of 2018 NICE recommendations. Prescribing patterns before and after the NICE publication were subsequently explored. Questions were also asked about surgeon equipoise for participation in future RCTs. Following the new guidance, 34% (n=87) used low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) alone, 33% (n=85) aspirin (commonly preceded by LMWH), and 31% (n=81) direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs: with/without preceding LMWH) for THR. For TKR, 42% (n=105) used aspirin (usually monotherapy), 31% (n=78) LMWH alone, and 27% (n=68) DOAC (with/without preceding LMWH). NICE guidance changed the practice of 34% of hip and 41% of knee surgeons, with significantly increased use of aspirin preceded by LMWH for THR (before=25% vs. after=73%;p<0.001), and aspirin for TKR (before=18% vs. after=84%;p<0.001). Significantly more regimens were NICE guidance compliant after the 2018 update for THR (before=85.7% vs. after=92.6%;p=0.011) and TKR (before=87.0% vs. after=98.8%;p<0.001). Support from surgeons for future RCTs was dependent on the clinical question, ranging from 48% participation in trials (effectiveness of aspirin vs. a DOAC) to 79% (effectiveness of 14 days LMWH vs. 28 days LMWH). Over one-third of surveyed surgeons changed their VTE chemical prophylaxis in response to 2018 NICE recommendations, with more THR and TKR surgeons now compliant with latest NICE guidance. The major change in practice was an increased use of aspirin for VTE chemical prophylaxis. Furthermore, there is an appetite amongst UK surgeons for participating in future RCTs, with a trial comparing standard versus extended duration LMWH likely feasible in current practice

The Hospital (Trust) guidelines generally recommend 40mg of Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) twice daily (BD) for all patients over 100kg for those undergoing total hip (THR) and knee replacements (TKR) respectively. British National Formulary (BNF) recommends 40mg of LMWH once daily (OD) for all patients regardless of their overall weight or body mass index (BMI). We evaluated the outcome of prophylactic LMWH dosage for patients undergoing THR and TKR by monitoring surgery related venous-thromboembolic events up to a minimum of three months after surgery. A retrospective audit was carried out after obtaining institutional approval and all consecutive elective patients weighing over 100kg and undergoing THR and TKR were included. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 3 months after their operation to investigate the dose of prophylactic LMWH received, and whether they had developed any venous thromboembolic events (VTE) post operatively. This was done using a combination of electronic notes, drug charts and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) reports on the hospital/trust database. A total of 53 patients underwent elective THR (18) and TKR (35) between the period of March 2017 and September 2017. Forty-four patients received 40 mg OD and 9 patients had 40 mg BD. None of the patients developed a confirmed DVT or pulmonary embolism in the 3 months following surgery regardless of the dose received. We demonstrate that there is no clinical benefit in having patients over 100kg on twice daily LMWH with the aim of preventing post-op thromboembolic complications. This conclusion is in line with the BNF recommendations for VTE prophylaxis

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious complication after total hip and knee arthroplasty. There is still no consensus regarding the best mode of thromboprophylaxis after lower limb arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to ascertain the efficacy, safety profile and rate of adverse thromboembolic events of aspirin as extended out of hospital pharmacological anticoagulation for elective primary total hip and knee arthroplasty patients and whether these rates were comparable with published data for low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Data was extracted from a prospective hospital acquired thromboembolism (HAT) database. The period of study was from 1st Jan 2013-31st Dec 2016 and a total of 6078 patients were treated with aspirin as extended thromboprophylaxis after primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. The primary outcome measure of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism within 90 days postoperatively was 1.11%. The secondary outcome rates of wound infection, bleeding complications, readmission rate and mortality were comparable to published results after LMWH use. The results of this study clearly show that Aspirin, as part of a multimodal thromboprophylactic regime, is an effective and safe regime in preventing VTE with respect to risk of DVT or PE when compared to LMWH. It is a cheaper alternative to LMWH and has associated potential cost savings

Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is frequently used as thromboprophylaxis after major orthopaedic surgery. Varying levels of non-adherence (5% to 45%) with outpatient LMWH has been reported. Oral direct thrombin inhibitors have been recommended by industry due to ease of administration. We aim to audit the compliance rate with outpatient LMWH treatment following primary total hip arthroplasties (THA) in our district general hospital (DGH). Using the ORMIS computer system, we identified all primary THA performed in Monklands Hospital between July 2011 and August 2012. Patients’ case notes were analysed retrospectively, looking at operating surgeon's postoperative thromboprophylaxis instructions. We then conducted a telephone interview on patients discharged with outpatient LMWH to assess compliance. There were 58 primary THAs performed during the audit period. 33 patients were discharged on outpatient LMWH, whilst 15 patients and 3 patients were discharged on aspirin and warfarin respectively. Seven patients were excluded as their discharge prescriptions were missing. We successfully contacted 20 of the 33 patients discharged with outpatient LMWH. All respondents showed 100% compliance to the full course of treatment. 50% of patients self-administered; 30% were administered by district nurses and 20% by family members. 35% of patients preferred an oral tablet alternative, for its perceived ease of administration. Bruising and skin irritation were the reported problems in some patients, but these did not affect compliance. Contrary to the previous published non-adherence rates, the compliance rate with outpatient LMWH after THA was high in our DGH. The patient counseling, and family/district nurse involvement in may have contributed to this. However, our numbers of patients are low but data collection continues

Aims. Thromboprophylaxis following Total Hip Replacement (THR) surgery remains controversial, balancing VTE prevention against wound leakage and subsequent deep infection. We analysed the 90 day cause of death post THR in our institution after the implementation of new thromboprophylactic policy of low dose aspirin for low risk patients, as part of a multimodal regime. Those at high risk were anticoagulated. Patients and methods. The PAS database was used to identify patients undergoing primary THR between January 2012 and June 2017 at The Royal Derby Hospital, and all deaths within 90 days. Trauma cases were excluded. Case note review and Coroner's verdict were utilised to ascertain cause of death. Results were compared to a previous study at the same institution prior to the introduction of the new policy, where thromboprophylaxis was decided upon by surgeon preference for either LMWH, aspirin or warfarin. Results. During this period 4021 THRs were performed. The rate of mortality was 0.22% at 90 days. This compares to 0.58% in the previous study with the only other factor changing being the rapidity of post op mobilization. Of the 9 deaths, only one was due to fatal pulmonary embolism. None of the deaths were at high risk of VTE. This compared to 5 fatal pulmonary embolism deaths in1838 patients in the previous study in the LMWH group. The leading causes of death were heart failure and lower respiratory tract infection. Conclusion. Our institution reports a similar 90 day (0.22%) mortality using aspirin to that in the last 5 years on the NJR (0.3%) in which over 80% use LMWH. We confirm that fatal PE following elective THR with a multi-modal prophylaxis regime is rare. Changing to low dose aspirin in low risk patients is a safe option

Background. The most appropriate form of chemical thromboprophylaxis following knee replacement is a contentious issue. Most national guidelines recommend the use of low molecular weight Heparin (LMWH) whilst opposing the use of aspirin. We compared thromboembolic events, major haemorrhage and death after knee replacement in patients receiving either aspirin or LMWH. Methods. Data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales was linked to an administrative database of hospital admissions in the English National Health Service. A total of 156 798 patients undergoing knee replacement between April 2003 and September 2008 were included and followed up for 90 days. Multivariable risk modelling was used to estimate odds ratios adjusted for baseline risk factors (AOR). An AOR < 1 indicates that risk rates are lower with LMWH than with aspirin. Results. In all, 23.1% of patients were prescribed aspirin and 76.9% LMWH. We found no statistically significant differences in the rate of pulmonary embolism (aspirin 0.49%, LMWH 0.45%, AOR 0.88; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.74 to 1.05), 90-day mortality (0.39% versus 0.45%, AOR 1.13; 95% CI 0.94–1.37) and major haemorrhage (0.37% versus 0.39%, AOR 1.01; 95% CI 0.83–1.22). There was a significantly greater likelihood of requirement for return to theatre in the aspirin group (0.26% versus 0.19%, AOR 0.73; 95% CI 0.58–0.94). Discussion. Between patients receiving LMWH or aspirin, there was no difference in the risk of pulmonary embolus, 90-day mortality and major haemorrhage. These results should be considered when the existing guidelines for thromboprophylaxis after knee replacement are reviewed

Introduction. Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is a potentially serious complication after total hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasty, traditionally justifying aggressive prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or direct oral anticoagulants (DOA) at the cost of an increased risk of bleeding. However, fast-track procedures might reduce the DVT risk and decrease the cost-benefit ratio of the current recommendations. The objective of this study was to compare thrombotic and bleeding risk in an unselected population of elective THA and TKA with a fast-track procedure. MATERIAL - METHODS. A series of 1,949 patients were analyzed prospectively. There were 1,136 women and 813 men, with a mean age of 70 years. In particular, 16% were previously treated by antiplatelet agents and 8% by anticoagulants. All patients followed a fast-track procedure including early walking within 24 hours of surgery, and 80% of patients returned home after surgery, with a mean length of stay of 3 days (THA) or 4 days (TKA). The occurrence of a thromboembolic event or hemorrhagic complication has been identified. Results. Out of the 1,110 THAs, 5 thromboembolic events were identified (0.4%): 2 non-fatal pulmonary embolism and 3 DVTs. There was no impact of these complications on the final result. 19 hemorrhagic complications were identified (1.7%): 10 significant haematomas (3 of which were complicated by infection), 9 anemias (with 4 transfusions). Out of the 839 TKAs, 9 thromboembolic events were identified (1.0%): 4 non-fatal pulmonary embolism and 5 DVTs. There was no impact of these complications on the final result. 14 hemorrhagic complications were identified (1.7%): 8 haematomas including 4 reoperations, 6 anemias (with 5 transfusions). Discussion. Thromboembolic complications after elective THA and TKA have virtually disappeared, with a rate of 0.7%. On the other hand, bleeding complications are now more frequent, with a rate of 1.7%. This suggests that the cost-benefit ratio of preventive treatments with LMWH or DOA should be reassessed. Prescribing LMWH or DOA after elective THA and TKA with fast-track procedures exposes the patient to a much higher risk of bleeding than thrombotic risk. The use of aspirin may represent an acceptable compromise in these patients

Purpose: The report of a case o f a patient, who underwent a total hip arthroplasty and sustained cerebral hemorrhage due to low molecular weight heparin. Case report: A 46-years-old woman had a total hip replacement due to secondary osteoarthritis after a congenital hip dislocation. She had a free medical record. Treatment with LMWH started the day of the surgery. The patient was dismissed from the hospital the sixth postoperative day, being well, and came back the ninth postoperative day, complaining of hypertension, headache and motor disturbances of her left upper limb. Neurological examination did not revealed any particular findings except reduced strength of her left upper limb. A brain CT scanning showed no significant findings, while her blood platelet count was126000 while immediately postoperatively was 180000 and preoperatively 220000. The following day the patient established a paresis of her left arm and the platelet count fell to 35000, while a new CT scan, revealed small hemorrhages in both parietal cortexes of the brain. LMWH was discontinued. The patient deceased the 11th postoperative day. Conclusion: Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia type II and hemorrhage due to LMWH is very rare but should be bared in mind from the orthopaedic surgeon who uses LMWH for DVT prophylaxis. Clinical suspicion mandates immediate discontinuation of the agent and consideration of an alternative anticoagulation therapy along with general support of the patient

Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) is the most common complication following major joint surgery. While attention has focused on VTE following joint arthroplasty their exists a gap in the literature examining the incidence of VTE in spinal surgery; with a shortage of epidemiological data, guidelines for optimal prophylaxis are limited. This survey, undertaken at the 2009 BASS Annual Meeting, sought to examine prevailing trends in VTE thromboprophylaxis in spinal surgery and to compare selections made by Orthopaedic and Neurosurgeons. We developed a questionnaire based around eight clinical scenarios. Participants were asked to supply details on their speciality (orthopaedics or neurosurgery) and level of training (grade) and to select which method(s) of thromboprophylaxis they would employ for each scenario. Thirty-nine participants provided responses to the eight scenarios; complete details, including speciality and grade of those surveyed, were complied for 27 of the 39 questionnaires completed. LMWH was the preferred pharmacological method of thromboprophylaixs selected 31% and 72% of the time by orthopaedic and neurosurgeons respectively. For each of the eight clinical scenarios LMWH and BK TEDS were selected more frequently by neurosurgeons than orthopaedic surgeons who elected to employ early mobilisation and mechanical prophylaxis. Neurosurgeons were more likely to employ more than method of thromboprophylaxis. Thromboprophylactic selections differed between the two groups; Neurosurgeons preferred LMWH and BK TEDS whilst Early Mobilisation and Mechanical prophylaxis were the preferred methods of thromboprophylaxis amongst orthopaedic surgeons. Based on the results of this survey neurosurgeons more closely adhered to guidelines outlined by NICE/BASS

Introduction. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Effectiveness recommends both low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and Rivaroxaban for venous thromboembolic (VTE) prophylaxis following lower limb arthroplasty. Despite evidence in the literature that suggests Rivaroxaban reduces VTE events, there are emerging concerns from the orthopaedic community regarding an increase in wound complications following its use. Methods. Through the orthopaedic clinical directors forum, Trusts replacing LMWH with Rivaroxaban for lower limb arthroplasty thromboprophylaxis during 2009 were identified. Prospectively collected Hospital episode statistics (HES) data was then analysed for these units so as to determine rates of 90-day symptomatic deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE), major bleed (cerebrovascular accident or gastrointestinal haemorrhage), all-cause mortality, and 30-day wound infection and readmission rates before and after the change to Rivaroxaban. 2752 patients prescribed Rivaroxaban following TKR or THR were compared to 10358 patients prescribed LMWH. Data was analysed using odds ratios (OR). Results. There were significantly more wound infections in the Rivaroxaban group (3.85% vs. 2.81%, OR=0.72; 95% CI 0.58-0.90). There were no significant differences between the two groups for PTE (OR=1.52; 0.77-2.97), major bleed (OR=0.73; 0.48-1.12), all-cause mortality (OR=0.93; 0.46-1.87) and re-admission rate (OR=1.21; 0.88-1.67). There were significantly fewer symptomatic DVTs in the Rivaroxaban group (0.91% vs. 0.36%, OR=2.51; 1.30-4.82). Conclusion. This study is the first to describe the real impact of the use of Rivaroxaban in the NHS. When compared with LMWH in lower limb arthroplasty patients, wound infection rates were significantly higher following Rivaroxaban use whilst providing no reduction in symptomatic PTE or all-cause mortality

Background. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Effectiveness recommends both low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and Rivaroxaban for venous thromboembolic (VTE) prophylaxis following lower limb arthroplasty. Despite evidence in the literature that suggests Rivaroxaban reduces VTE events, there are emerging concerns from the orthopaedic community regarding an increase in wound complications following its use. Methods. Through the orthopaedic clinical directors forum, Trusts replacing LMWH with Rivaroxaban for lower limb arthroplasty thromboprophylaxis during 2009 were identified. Prospectively collected Hospital episode statistics (HES) data was then analysed for these units so as to determine rates of 90-day symptomatic deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), major bleed (cerebrovascular accident or gastrointestinal haemorrhage), all-cause mortality, and 30-day wound infection and readmission rates before and after the change to Rivaroxaban. 2752 patients prescribed Rivaroxaban following TKR or THR were compared to 10358 patients prescribed LMWH. Data was analysed using odds ratios (OR). Results. There were significantly more wound infections in the Rivaroxaban group (3.85% vs. 2.81%, OR=0.72; 95% CI 0.58–0.90). There were no significant differences between the two groups for PE (OR=1.52; 0.77–2.97), major bleed (OR=0.73; 0.48–1.12), all-cause mortality (OR=0.93; 0.46–1.87) and re-admission rate (OR=1.21; 0.88–1.67). There were significantly fewer symptomatic DVTs in the Rivaroxaban group (0.91% vs. 0.36%, OR=2.51; 1.30–4.82). Discussion. This study is the first to describe the real impact of the use of Rivaroxaban in the NHS. When compared with LMWH in lower limb arthroplasty patients, there were fewer DVTs in the Rivaroxaban group. However, wound infection rates were significantly higher following Rivaroxaban use whilst providing no reduction in symptomatic PE or all-cause mortality

Although a number of agents have been shown to reduce the risk of thromboembolic disease, their use in total hip replacement (THR) remains controversial. Uncertainty exists regarding the safety of chemical prophylaxis as well as the choice of the most effective agent. Previous studies suggested that pneumatic compression with foot-pumps provide the best balance of safety and effectiveness, however too few patients were investigated in randomised clinical trials to draw evidence-based conclusions. The purpose of this randomized clinical trial was to compare the safety and efficacy of pneumatic compression with foot-pumps versus low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for prophylaxis against DVT. Inclusion criteria were hip osteoarthritis and age less than 80 years. Exclusion criteria were history of thromboembolic disease, heart disease, and bleeding diatheses. 216 consecutive patients were considered for inclusion in the trial and were randomized either for management with LMWH (Fraxiparin, Sanofi-Synthelabo, France) or with the A-V Impulse foot-pump (Orthofix Vascular Novamedix, UK). Patients were monitored for DVT using serial duplex sonography and phlebography. DVT was detected in 3 of 100 patients managed with the foot-pump compared with 6 of 100 patients who received chemical prophylaxis (p< .05). Sixteen patients did not tolerate continuous use of the foot-pump and were excluded from the study. The average postoperative drainage was 259ml in the foot-pump group and 328ml in the LMWH group (p< .05). Patients with foot-pump had less swelling of the thigh (10mm compared with 15mm) (p< .05). The patients of the foot-pump group had less postoperative oozing and bruising than did those who had received LMWH. One patient developed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. This study confirms the safety and efficacy of mechanical prophylaxis of DVT in THR. Some patients cannot tolerate the foot-pump

Background: Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) are of undoubted efficacy as thromboprophylaxis in orthopaedic surgical practice. However, prolonged dosage inhibits bone nodule formation in vitro and we have previously reported that daily dosing significantly delays fracture healing. To further investigate these phenomena we hypothesised that LMWH’s would reduce osteoblast survival and thus bone formation by inducing programmed cell death (apoptosis). Methods: Primary human osteoblasts were isolated from femoral heads excised during hip arthoplasty and cultured to passage 3–5. These were examined for VEGF receptor expression using a biotinylated binding assay on flow cytometry. Osteoblasts were grown to confluence and then incubated for 24 hours in control medium or medium treated with enoxaparin (200 – 2X10(−4) IU/mL) or combination of enoxaparin (200 – 2X10 (−4) IU/mL) and VEGF (1ng/ml). Apoptosis was determined by measuring cytosolic histone-associated DNA fragmentation using an enzyme linked immunosorbant assay. Results were confirmed by DNA fragmentation analysis on agarose gel electrophoresis. Cell functional viability was measured by a tetrazolium bioreduction colorimetric assay. Results: Data is expressed as percentage of control apoptosis or viability, illustrates mean ± s.e.m. and n=4 experiments in each case. ANOVA was employed for statistical analysis; *versus control, #versus enoxaparin treated; p< 0.05 was considered significant. Conclusions: Therapeutic doses of LMWH attenuate osteo-blast survival by inducing significant apoptosis. This effect is partly abrogated by VEGF, which independently enhances osteoblast viability, thus delaying spontaneous and enoxaparin induced apoptosis. These findings may explain the bone resorptive effects of prolonged LMWH therapy and suggest a potential therapeutic role for VEGF in conditions of delayed bone formation

Introduction:. The National institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines for thromboprophylaxis following lower limb surgery and plastercast immobilisation recommend pharmacological prophylaxis be considered until the cast is removed. These guidelines have been extrapolated from data for hip and knee arthroplasty, and trauma studies. Recent studies have questioned the validity of these guidelines. At Portsmouth, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is prescribed for 14 days following surgery in high risk patients. The protocol predates the most recent NICE guidance. We set out to investigate whether this was a safe method of thromboprophylaxis following elective hindfoot surgery. Methods:. A retrospective audit of all patients undergoing hindfoot surgery between 01/01/10 and 31/12/12 was performed. All patients were immobilised in a POP backslab and prescribed 14 days of LMWH. All patients were reviewed at 2 weeks and converted to a full cast or boot. Immobilisation was continued for between 6 and 12 weeks. A list of all patients who had undergone investigation for deep vein thrombosis at Queen Alexandra hospital from 01/01/10 to 28/03/13 was obtained from the VTE investigation department. The two lists were cross referenced to identify any DVTs occurring following hindfoot surgery and plastercast immobilisation. Results:. During the 3 years, 197 major hindfoot operations were performed in 194 patients. Mean age was 53 years (range18-82) and 94 males with 100 females. Two patients had confirmed deep vein thromboses; 1 patient at 13 days post op while receiving LMWH prophylaxis. Conclusion:. Symptomatic VTE following elective hindfoot surgery and post operative plaster cast immobilisation in our hospital is rare. There are no randomised controlled trials to guide thromboprophylaxis regimes following hindfoot surgery. Based on our results, our protocol appears to be effective and safe

National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines on venous thromboembolic (VTE) prophylaxis for patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery recommend that all inpatients be offered a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Linked hospital episode statistics of 219602 patients were examined to determine the rates of complications following lower limb arthroplasty for the 12-month periods prior to and following the publication of these guidelines. This was compared with data from the National Joint Register (England and Wales) regarding LMWH usage during the same periods. There was a significant increase in the reported use of LMWH (59.5 to 67.6%, p< 0.01) between the two periods. However, 90-day VTE events increased following both total hip (THR, 1.67% to 1.84%, p=0.06) and knee replacement (TKR, 1.99% to 2.04%, p=0.60). 30-day return to theatre rate for infection fell following TKR, but increased after THR. In addition, there were increases in rates of thrombocytopenia, which was significant following THR (p=0.03). Recommendations from NICE are based on predicted reductions in VTE events, reducing morbidity, mortality and costs to the National Health Service. Early results in orthopaedic patients are unable to support these predictions

INTRODUCTION. We examined whether the introduction of an oral factor Xa inhibitor, increased total blood loss in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty surgery. METHODS. Two groups were studied. The intervention group were prescribed a factor Xa inhibitor 6-10 hours post-surgery, and the control group were prescribed low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) 6-10 hours post-surgery. All other factors were kept constant. Pre- and post-operative haemoglobin levels (post-operative on day 2) were recorded. Any requirement for transfusion was also documented. Actual drop in haemoglobin levels was compared between the two groups. RESULTS. 43 patients were prescribed a factor Xa inhibitor and 37 patients LMWH thromboprophylaxis. Baseline pre-operative haemoglobin were comparable (p=0.91; 13.2 vs 13.2g/dL), however, post-operative blood loss was significantly increased in the factor Xa inhibitor group (p=<0.0001; 3.4 vs 2.6g/dL). More patients required transfusion in the factor Xa inhibitor group (0.07% vs 0.03%). Blood loss was significantly increased in the intervention group in patients who were not on anti-platelet medication, when compared with those on concurrent anti-platelet therapy (p=<0.001). CONCLUSIONS. Oral factor Xa inhibitors significantly increase post-operative blood loss in total knee arthroplasty surgery when compared with LMWH. There is a subsequent increased requirement for blood transfusion and the potential complications related to bleeding and transfusion. These factors must be considered and balanced with the ease of oral anticoagulation when introducing these newer agents in total knee arthroplasty patients. The anticoagulatory effects of oral factor Xa inhibitors are most pronounced in patients not on concurrent anti-platelet therapy

Patients with hip fracture are at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Chemical thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is associated with a risk of major bleeding in certain patient groups, such as those with renal failure. In these patients, unfractionated heparin should be used. Our aim was to determine the practice of VTE risk assessment in patients admitted with hip fracture against the national guidance, which states that all should have VTE risk assessment on admission. We also assessed the impact of introducing the VTE risk assessment form on prescribing practice of chemical thromboprophylaxis in patients with renal failure. Prospective audit of patients of 50 patients admitted with hip fracture from 4/8/10 with re-audit of 50 patients admitted from 17/2/2011 after introducing the VTE risk assessment form into the hip fracture admissions proforma. Retrospective analysis was undertaken to determine chemical thromboprophylaxis prescribing in patients with eGFR <30ml/min/1.73m. 2. . Patient demographics were comparable in both audit loops, with the mean age being equal (84 years) and an equal majority of female patients (76%). There were similar numbers of patients with eGFR <30ml/min/1.73m. 2. in both audit loops with 8% (n=4) in the initial audit, and 10% (n=5) in the re-audit. Frequency of VTE risk assessment significantly increased from 16% to 86% after including the VTE risk assessment form in the hip fracture proforma (p<0.0001). Despite this, there was no significant reduction in prescribing of LMWH in patients with renal failure with eGFR <30ml/min/1.73m. 2. , (P=0.52). Documentation of VTE risk assessment in patients admitted with hip fracture can be improved by simple measures such as inclusion of the VTE risk assessment form in the admissions proforma. However, this did not result in a reduction of LMWH prescribed in patients with significant renal failure and risk of major bleeding

Background: Diagnostic and operative codes are routinely collected on every patient admitted to National Health Service (NHS) hospitals in England and Wales (hospital episode statistics, HES). The data allows for linkage of post-operative complications and primary operative procedures, even when patients are re-admitted following a successful discharge. Morbidity and mortality data on foot and ankle surgery (F& A) has not previously been available in large numbers for NHS patients. Methods: All HES data for a 44-month period prior to August 2008 was analysed and divided into four groups – hindfoot fusion, ankle fracture surgery, ankle replacement and a control group. The control group was of first metatarsal osteotomy, which is predominantly day case surgery where no above ankle cast is used. The incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) and all cause mortality (MR) within 90 days, and a return to theatre (RTT, as a complication of the index procedure) within 30 days was calculated for each group. Results: 7448 patients underwent a hindfoot fusion. PE, RTT and MR were 0.11%, 0.11% and 0.12% respectively. 58732 patients had operative fixation of an ankle fracture. PE, RTT and MR were 0.16%, 0.08% and 0.35%. 1695 patients had an ankle replacement. PE, RTT and MR were 0.06%, 0.35% and zero. 35206 patients underwent a first metatarsal osteotomy. PE, RTT and mortality rates were 0.02%, 0.01% and 0.03%. Discussion: There is controversy regarding the use of venous thrombo-embolic (VTE) prophylaxis in foot and ankle surgery. Non-fatal PE in F& A surgery has previously been reported as 0.15%. NICE guidelines recommend low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for all inpatient orthopaedic surgery. 94% of F& A surgeons prescribe LMWH to post operative elective inpatients in plaster according to a previous British Orthopaedic foot and ankle society survey. VTE events, RTT and mortality rates for all groups were extremely low, including inpatient procedures requiring prolonged immobilisation. We question the widespread use of LMWH

Introduction: In April 2007, NICE published guidance on reducing the risk of venous thromboembolism. Immobilization of a limb in plaster was identified as a risk factor for thromboembolism. NICE recommend that all orthopaedic patients with risk factors are offered low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) whilst an inpatient. There was no cost effective evidence to continue treatment as an outpatient in foot and ankle patients. Foot and ankle surgery often requires prolonged periods of immobilization postoperatively. This study aims to provide a snapshot of current practice amongst foot and ankle surgeons in the UK, highlighting any differences between current practice and NICE guidelines. Materials and Methods: A random sample of the 267 members of the British Foot and Ankle Surgery Society listed in the 2007 BOA Handbook was obtained. In order to have a 90% confidence level, the sample size was calculated to be 71. The specialist teams identified were contacted by telephone and questioned on their use of thromboprophylaxis for elective patients in plaster. The results were collated and compared to NICE guidelines. Results: 94% of foot and ankle surgeons prescribe LMWH to post operative elective inpatients in plaster. 65% of specialists continue thromboprophylaxis for out-patients. The duration and agent of thromboprophylaxis varied markedly. The commonest agents were LMWH and aspirin. The length of treatment ranged from ten days to the duration of plaster immobilization. Discussion: The results highlight a trend amongst foot and ankle surgeons to exceed current NICE guidelines for thromboprophylaxis, continuing treatment for an extended outpatient period. Although there was shown to be no cost effective evidence to continue treatment, the practice continues. Conclusion: The vast majority of UK foot and ankle surgeons fulfill the NICE recommendations on thromboprophylaxis. There is a clear need for a policy statement from BOFAS on the extended use of thromboprophylaxis for outpatients immobilized in plaster