The treatment of rotator cuff arthropathy due to irreparable massive rotator cuff tear is still challenging. We performed reverse total shoulder arthroplasties for 2 cases of cuff tear arthropathy. The short term follow-up after the surgery reveal excellent results by ASES and UCLA score. However, these results still require long term follow-up and the study about implant design for the shoulder anatomy of the Koreans

Introduction. Total shoulder arthroplasty is the fastest growing joint replacement in recent years, with projected compound annual growth rates of 10% for 2016 through 2021 – higher than those of both the hip and knee combined. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has gained particular interest as a solution for patients with irreparable massive rotator cuff tears and failed conventional shoulder replacement, for whom no satisfactory intervention previously existed. As the number of indications for RTSA continues to grow, so do implant designs, configurations, and fixation techniques. It has previously been shown that continuous implant migration within the first two years postoperatively is predictive of later loosening and failure in the hip and knee, with aseptic loosening of implant components a guaranteed cause for revision in the reverse shoulder. By identifying implants with a tendency to migrate, they can be eliminated from clinical practice prior to widespread use. The purpose of this study is to, for the first time, evaluate the pattern and magnitude of implant component migration in RTSA using the gold standard imaging technique radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Methods. Forty patients were prospectively randomized to receive either a cemented or press-fit humeral stem, and a glenosphere secured to the glenoid with either autologous bone graft or 3D printed porous titanium (Aequalis Ascend Flex, Wright Medical Group, Memphis, TN, USA) for primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Following surgery, partients are imaged using RSA, a calibrated, stereo x-ray technique, at 6 weeks (baseline), 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Migration of the humeral stem and glenosphere at each time point is compared to baseline. Preliminary results are presented, with 15 patients having reached the 6-month time point by presentation. Results. Implant migration of ten participants at the 3-month time point is presented. Maximum total point motion (MTPM) is a measure of translation and rotation of the point on the implant that has moved the most from baseline. Average MTPM ± SD of the humeral stem is 1.18 ± 0.65 mm and 0.98 ± 0.46 mm for press-fit (n = 6) and cemented (n = 4) stems, respectively; and 0.25 ± 0.09 mm and 0.47 ± 0.24 mm for bone graft (n = 4) and porous titanium (n = 6) glenosphere fixations, respectively, at the 3-month time point. Conclusion. There is a trend towards increased migration with the use of press-fit humeral stems and porous titanium glenosphere fixation, though no conclusions can be made from the current sample size. Further, though differences in migration magnitude may be observed at early postoperative time points, it is expected that all fixation techniques will show stability from 1 to 2 years postoperatively

Purpose. Chronic massive rotator cuff tears are challenging to repair completely because of the development of tendon retraction with inelasticity, muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration. The objective of this study was to investigate the clinical outcome and MRI findings after arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction (ASCR) for symptomatic irreparable rotator cuff tears. Methods. From 2011 to 2013, 12 shoulders in 12 consecutive patients (mean, 70.8 years) with irreparable massive rotator cuff tears underwent ASCR using fascia lata. We used suture anchors to attach the graft medially to the glenoid superior tubercle and laterally to the greater tuberosity as same technique by Mihata et al. We added side-to-side sutures between the graft and infraspinatus tendon and between the graft and residual anterior supraspinatus/subscapularis tendon to improve force coupling. Physical examination, clinical rating system, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed before surgery; at 6 and 12 months after surgery; and 6 months thereafter. Average follow-up was 19.1 months (12 to 28 months) after surgery. We assessed patients preoperatively by using the scoring systems of the shoulder index of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), the Japanese Orthopaedic Association, and the University of California, Los Angeles. Results. Mean active elevation increased from 59° to 111° significantly and external rotation increased from 28 to 33. The average preoperative scores were 16.0 points by ASES, 48.0 points by JOA, and 10.8 points by UCLA. Average clinical outcome scores all improved significantly after ASCR at the final follow-up (ASES, 73.3 points; JOA, 73.7 points; UCLA, 22.7 points). There was surgical complication as infection. Although infection was controlled by arthroscopic irrigation, the transplanted tendon was absorbed, and preoperative conditions did not functionally improve. Five patients had graft tear during follow-up. Postoperative active range of motion in the healed patients was significantly greater than in the unhealed patients who had graft tears. Conclusions. ASCR restored superior glenohumeral stability and function of the shoulder joint with irreparable rotator cuff tears compared to preoperative function in the cases without postoperative complications. However ratio of graft tears were 50% and clinical results of these cases were not improved sufficiently

Purpose of the study: Treatment of irrepable massive rotator cuff tears remains a controversial issue. The purpose of this study was to assess clinical and radiological outcome in patients with a reversed shoulder prosthesis used for the treatment of irreparable massive rotator cuff tears with or without associated glenohumeral osteoarthritic degeneration. Material and methods: Between 1996 and 2002, 55 reversed shoulder prostheses were implanted via a superolateral approach. Mean follow-up of the 15 men and 40 women (mean age 73 years, age range 57–86 years) was 34.8 months (range 24–84 months). The supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons were retracted to the glenoid and ruptured in 100% of the patients: 27 shoulders (49%) also presented a infrascapularis tear. Glenohumeral osteoarthritis (Fukuda IV and V) was persent in 29 patients. Postoperatively, patients were assessed with the Constant score and radiographically on plain x-rays. Results: Three patients were excluded from the analysis because of implant infection and removal before review. Subjectively, 90% of patients were satisfied or very satisfied. All items of the Constant score improved significantly (p< 0.0001). Active elevation improved from 65° to 123°. External rotation was not improved. Radiographically, there wre 41 shoulders with a grade 0, 1 or 2 notch (Nerot system), and 11 with a grade 3 or 4 notch. Thirteen patients (25%) presented heterotopic ossifications. Discussion and conclusion: In this context, the clinical results obtained with this prosthesis are much better than with any other type of arthroplasty. Radiographically, heterotopic ossifications have a significant impact on the Constant score (p=0.015). Presence of ta glenoid notch is signifiantly associated with use of a medialized or retaining polyethylene cup (p< 0.0001). For us, loosening of the metaglenoidglenosphere bloc is related to the progression of the glenoid notch. For these reasons, it would be preferable to reserve this type of arthroplasty for patients aged over 70 years presenting an irreparable massive cuff tear with satisfactory glenoid bone stock sufficient for obtaining a good anchor for the metaglen. We recommend only using lateralized polyethylene cups