Biological reconstruction techniques after diaphyseal tumour resection have increased in popularity in recent years. High complication and failure rates have been reported with intercalary allografts, with recent studies questioning their role in limb-salvage surgery. We developed a technique in which large segment allografts are augmented with intramedullary cement and fixed using compression plating. The goal of this study was to evaluate the survivorship, complications and functional outcomes of these intercalary reconstructions. Forty-two patients who had reconstruction with an intercalary allograft following tumour resection between 1989 and 2010 were identified from our prospectively collected database. Allograft survival, local recurrence-free, disease-free and overall survival were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Patient function was assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society (MSTS) scoring system and the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS). The 23 women and 19 men had a mean age of 33 years (14–77). The most common diagnoses were osteosarcoma (n=16) and chondrosarcoma (n=9). There were 9 humerus, 18 femur and 15 tibia reconstructions. At a mean follow-up of 95 months (5–288), 31 patients were alive without disease, 10 were dead of disease and 1 was deceased of other causes. There were 4 local recurrences and 11 patients developed metastatic disease. 5-year local recurrence free survival was 92%, 5-year disease-free survival was 70% and overall survival was 75%. Fourteen of 42 patients (33%) experienced complications: 5 wound healing complications, 4 infections, 2 non-unions, 2 fractures and 1 nerve palsy. Four allografts (9.5%) were revised for complications and 2 (5%) for local recurrence. Mean allograft survival was 85 months (4–288). Mean time to union was 8.2 (3–36) months for the proximal osteotomy site and 8.1 (3–23) months for the distal osteotomy site. The mean score for MSTS 87 was 29.4 (+/− 4.4), MSTS 93 was 83.7 (+/−14.8) and TESS was 81.6 (+/−16.9). An intercalary allograft augmented with intramedullary cement and compression plate fixation provides a reliable and durable method of reconstruction after tumour resection. Complication rates are comparable to the literature and are associated with high levels of patient function and satisfaction

In order to investigate the efficacy of free vascularised fibular graft (VFG) after bone intercalary tumour resection in tibia, we present our results with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. From 1988 to 2001, 47 patients affected by high-grade tibial sarcoma in 31 cases (66%), and low-grade diesease in 16 cases (34%) were treated in our department. Average age was 19 years (range 5–60 years), with a male/female ratio of 1.35. The average length of tibial resection was 15 cm, while the average length of the fibular graft was 19 cm. In 11 cases (21%) VFG was assembled alone, while in 36 cases (79%) a massive bone allograft was associated to the fibula. Three patients developed a deep infection, treated by amputation in two cases and by graft removal and an Ilizarov device in one case. Minor complications occurred in 28 cases (55%) (stress fractures, wound slough, osteosynthesis breakage), all healed by minor surgery or conservative treatment. At an average follow-up of 108 months (range 24 to 185 months), four patients had died of disease and three were lost to follow-up. Regarding the overall results, the combined group of fibula plus massive allograft showed to be more effective than the group of fibula alone in terms of early weight bearing (6 versus 12 months), while VFG showed intrinsic efficacy in achieving early bony fusion at the osteotomy lines and hypertrophy of the graft in both groups. Furthermore, using the combined assembly the articular surface could be spared in all the trans-epiphyseal resections, while VFG alone appeared to be electively indicated for infected or irradiated fields. In conclusion, despite the demanding surgical technique, VFG appears to be a long-lasting and definitive biological reconstruction procedure after intercalary tibial resection

Aims

The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of 3D-printed modular prostheses in patients who underwent joint-sparing limb salvage surgery (JSLSS) for malignant femoral diaphyseal bone tumours.

Aims. Our purpose was to describe an unusual series of 21 patients with fungal osteomyelitis after an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R). Methods. We present a case-series of consecutive patients treated at our institution due to a severe fungal osteomyelitis after an arthroscopic ACL-R from November 2005 to March 2015. Patients were referred to our institution from different areas of our country. We evaluated the amount of bone resection required, type of final reconstructive procedure performed, and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) functional score. Results. A total of 21 consecutive patients were included in the study; 19 were male with median age of 28 years (IQR 25 to 32). All ACL-R were performed with hamstrings autografts with different fixation techniques. An oncological-type debridement was needed to control persistent infection symptoms. There were no recurrences of fungal infection after median of four surgical debridements (IQR 3 to 6). Five patients underwent an extensive curettage due to the presence of large cavitary lesions and were reconstructed with hemicylindrical intercalary allografts (HIAs), preserving the epiphysis. An open surgical debridement was performed resecting the affected epiphysis in 15 patients, with a median bone loss of 11 cm (IQR 11.5 to 15.6). From these 15 cases, eight patients were reconstructed with allograft prosthesis composites (APC); six with tumour-type prosthesis (TTP) and one required a femoral TTP in combination with a tibial APC. One underwent an above-the-knee amputation. The median MSTS functional score was 20 points at a median of seven years (IQR 5 to 9) of follow-up. Conclusion. This study suggests that mucormycosis infection after an ACL-R is a serious complication. Diagnosis is usually delayed until major bone destructive lesions are present. This may originate additional massive reconstructive surgeries with severe functional limitations for the patients. Level of evidence: IV. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;2(1):3–8

The June 2015 Oncology Roundup. 360 . looks at: Infection in megaprosthesis; Impressive results for mid femoral reconstruction; Revered teaching or old myth? Femoral neck protection in metastatic disease; Megaprosthesis about the knee; Malignant transformation in multiple hereditary exostoses; Fracture of intercalary bone allograft; Comorbidity and outcomes in sarcoma; A worrying turn? Use of denosumab for giant cell tumour of bone

Introduction. A significant burden of disease exists with respect to critical sized bone defects; outcomes are unpredictable and often poor. There is no absolute agreement on what constitutes a “critically-sized” bone defect however it is widely considered as one that would not heal spontaneously despite surgical stabilisation, thus requiring re-operation. The aetiology of such defects is varied. High-energy trauma with soft tissue loss and periosteal stripping, bone infection and tumour resection all require extensive debridement and the critical-sized defects generated require careful consideration and strategic management. Current management practice of these defects lacks consensus. Existing literature tells us that tibial defects 25mm or great have a poor natural history; however, there is no universally agreed management strategy and there remains a significant evidence gap. Drawing its origins from musculoskeletal oncology, the Capanna technique describes a hybrid mode of reconstruction. Mass allograft is combined with a vascularised fibula autograft, allowing the patient to benefit from the favourable characteristics of two popular reconstruction techniques. Allograft confers initial mechanical stability with autograft contributing osteogenic, inductive and conductive capacity to encourage union. Secondarily its inherent vascularity affords the construct the ability to withstand deleterious effects of stressors such as infection that may threaten union. The strengths of this hybrid construct we believe can be used within the context of critical-sized bone defects within tibial trauma to the same success as seen within tumour reconstruction. Methodology. Utilising the Capanna technique in trauma requires modification to the original procedure. In tumour surgery pre-operative cross-sectional imaging is a pre-requisite. This allows surgeons to assess margins, plan resections and order allograft to match the defect. In trauma this is not possible. We therefore propose a two-stage approach to address critical-sized tibial defects in open fractures. After initial debridement, external fixation and soft tissue management via a combined orthoplastics approach, CT imaging is performed to assess the defect geometry, with a polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) spacer placed at index procedure to maintain soft tissue tension, alignment and deliver local antibiotics. Once comfortable that no further debridement is required and the risk of infection is appropriate then 3D printing technology can be used to mill custom jigs. Appropriate tibial allograft is ordered based on CT measurements. A pedicled fibula graft is raised through a lateral approach. The peroneal vessels are mobilised to the tibioperoneal trunk and passed medially into the bone void. The cadaveric bone is prepared using the custom jig on the back table and posterolateral troughs made to allow insertion of the fibula, permitting some hypertrophic expansion. A separate medial incision allows attachment of the custom jig to host tibia allowing for reciprocal cuts to match the allograft. The fibula is implanted into the allograft, ensuring nil tension on the pedicle and, after docking the graft, the hybrid construct is secured with multi-planar locking plates to provide rotational stability. The medial window allows plate placement safely away from the vascular pedicle. Results. We present a 50-year-old healthy male with a Gustilo & Anderson 3B proximal tibial fracture, open posteromedially with associated shear fragment, treated using the Capanna technique. Presenting following a fall climbing additional injuries included a closed ipsilateral calcaneal and medial malleolar fracture, both treated operatively. Our patient underwent reconstruction of his tibia with the above staged technique. Two debridements were carried out due to a 48-hour delay in presentation due to remote geographical location of recovery. Debridements were carried out in accordance with BOAST guidelines; a spanning knee external fixator applied and a small area of skin loss on the proximal medial calf reconstructed with a split thickness skin graft. A revision cement spacer was inserted into the metaphyseal defect measuring 84mm. At definitive surgery the external fixator was removed and graft fixation was extended to include the intra-articular fragments. No intra-operative complications were encountered during surgeries. The patient returned to theatre on day 13 with a medial sided haematoma. 20ml of haemoserous fluid was evacuated, a DAIR procedure performed and antibiotic-loaded bioceramics applied locally. Samples grew Staphylococcus aureus and antibiotic treatment was rationalised to Co-Trimoxazole 960mg BD and Rifampicin 450mg BD. The patient has completed a six-week course of Rifampicin and continues on suppressive Co-Trimoxazole monotherapy until planned metalwork removal. There is no evidence of ongoing active infection and radiological evidence of early union. The patient is independently walking four miles to the gym daily and we believe, thus far, despite accepted complications, we have demonstrated a relative early success. Conclusions. A variety of techniques exist for the management of critical-sized bone defects within the tibia. All of these come with a variety of drawbacks and limitations. Whilst acceptance of a limb length discrepancy is one option, intercalary defects of greater than 5 to 7cm typically require reconstruction. In patients in whom fine wire fixators and distraction osteogenesis are deemed inappropriate, or are unwilling to tolerate the frequent re-operations and potential donor site morbidity of the Masqualet technique, the Capanna technique offers a novel solution. Through using tibial allograft to address the size mismatch between vascularised fibula and tibia, the possible complication of fatigue fracture of an isolated fibula autograft is potentially avoidable in patients who have high functional demands. The Capanna technique has demonstrated satisfactory results within tumour reconstruction. Papers report that by combining the structural strength of allograft with the osteoconductive and osteoinductive properties of a vascularised autograft that limb salvage rates of greater than 80% and union rates of greater than 90% are achievable. If these results can indeed be replicated in the management of critical-sized bone defects in tibial trauma we potentially have a treatment strategy that can excel over the more widely practiced current techniques

Extracorporeal Irradiation and Reimplantation (EIR) of tumor bearing bone segments is an alternative reconstruction method for major osseous resections. In contrast with endoprosthetic reconstruction, EIR is a biologic solution and after a prolonged healing and remodeling period it is expected to create a structural and metabolic almost normal bone. After oncologic resection the bone segment is cleaned from adhered soft tissues and send to irradiation which kills malignant and normal cells. Reimplantation consists of fixation, mostly by plates, vascularised fibular graft insertion in the medullary canal, iliac bone graft in critical sites and ligamentous sutures. Since 2001 fifteen patients were submitted to EIR in our institution. Resections affected seven distal femurs, four proximal tibias, one acetabulum, one iliac bone and the proximal forehand bones once which bear 11 osteosarcomas, 2 Ewing’s sarcomas, 1 chondrosarcoma and 1 rhabdomyosarcoma. There were six males and nine females with age ranging from five to 55 years. Ten patients were submitted to osteoarticular reconstructions, three to intercalary and two to partial pelvis reconstructions. Local recurrence leading to amputation occurred in one patient and resection of an infected innominate bone occurred once. Three patients died two to nine months after surgery because of their disease. Five patients had metaphyseal fractures after one to 14 months after surgery. Four patients had no fracture; three of them had intercalary resections. The patient with osteoarticular resection and no fracture had his metaphyseal region injected with cement which prevented fracture and after 23 months have not developed osteoarthritis. All the cases in which a vascularised fibular graft was implanted progressive fusion of the living and dead bones were observed. As a conclusion EIR is a good alternative for intercalary resections. For osteoarticular resections improvement of the method are necessary to prevent fracture and ligamentous laxity

The August 2012 Oncology Roundup. 360. looks at: prolonged symptom duration; peri-operative mortality and above-knee amputation; giant cell tumour of the spine; surgical resection for Ewing’s sarcoma; intercalary allograft reconstruction of the femur for tumour defects; and an induced membrane technique for large bone defects

Limb salvage is the gold standard to treat sarcoma patients, but bone stock should be retained for the future, as many of these patients are young and active. For this observational clinical study, 107 patients that presented with 108 malignant or locally aggressive benign bone tumours were treated by wide en-bloc resection of the affected bone, extracorporeal irradiation with 300 Gy to eradicate the tumour, and reimplantation of the bone as an orthotopic autograft. The irradiated bone was rigidly fixed to the remaining bone with classical intramedullary or extramedullary osteosynthesis material. We made a subdivision between intercalary, composite and osteoarticular grafts. The pelvis was considered a third separate entity, as it was considered both an intercalary and an osteoarticular graft when the acetabulum was involved. The incidence of local recurrence with the use of an orthotopic autograft comprised the primary endpoint of this study. Secondary endpoints: preservation of bone stock with graft healing and evaluation of factors that determine preservation. No local recurrences could be detected in the irradiated grafts. One local recurrence was detected in the surrounding soft tissue. At 5 years follow-up, graft healing occurred in 64% of cases, providing stable and lasting reconstruction. Eleven percent of the grafts had to be removed due to several incidents, but none could be proven significant. All patient subgroups displayed comparable results. Early infection appeared to be a significant determinant for the development of pseudarthrosis. Pelvic reconstructions showed a worse outcome. According to the results, guidelines for indications and surgical guidelines, such as rigid fixation and bridging of the graft, are proposed for using this technique. In general sarcoma resection, extracorporeal irradiation, and reimplantation provides a stable and lasting reconstruction with preservation of bone stock

Introduction: Joint sparing is a prerequisite for biologic reconstructions allowing for permanent healing in bone tumors. The physis not crossed by vessels in children can provide a safe margin for tumor resection. In selected patients we have performed joint sparing procedures either by transepiphysial resection or by epiphysial distraction as introduced by Canadell and San Julian. Patients and methods: 8 children (1 ewing tumor, 8 osteosarcomas [1 multiple localizations]) with open physes 3 distal femurs, 6 proximal tibiae) were treated for metaphysial tumor localizations touching but not crossing to the physis. In 4 localizations epiphysial distraction was used, in the others transepiphysial resection. Reconstructions were performed with vascularized fibula alone in 4 cases, with vascularized fibula transfer and allograft in 1 patient, in the others only intercalary allografts were used. Results: F/u is 3 to 12 years. No local recurrence occurred. One intercalary allograft failed for infection after irradiation; this was salvaged by a modified rotation plasty. One patient with fibula reconstruction of the femur needed reosteosynthesis due to lack of fusion with a finally excellent result at 3 years f/u, in one the fractured allograft needed be replaced by autologous bone following temporary cement spacer, but the epiphysis could be retained. All patients have excellent joint function. Shortness due to loss of the physis is corrected by contralateral epiphysiodesis and/or lengthening. Conclusion: Epiphysial sparing tumor resection can be successful oncologically if patients are properly selected and surgery is respecting the tumor margins

Along with prosthetic components, a bone allograft is a major option to be considered in reconstructing a segmental bone loss after a primary malignant bone tumor resection. In most cases of primary bone tumor surgery, segments of long bone will be used as allografts. These are sterilely procured in operating theatre after an organ procurement. To facilitate the reconstruction, the periarticular soft tissues along with the cartilage are also dissected free during the harvest. Bone or osteochondral allografts can be implanted alone with osteosynthetic material or combined with a prosthesis. The allograft can be used as an osteoarticular end, an intercalary construct with or without arthrodesis or be implanted with a prosthesis. The main indication for using bone allograft in 2003 are the intercalary bone loss, an osteoarticular defect at the upper limb, at the proximal tibia and femur if tendon insertions are to be resected and at an anatomical location where no reliable prosthetic material exists such as the scapula or distal fibula. A risk of disease transmission and a high rate of fracture and nonunion are the main disadvantages of this material. An anatomical reconstruction of the skeleton, the possibility to reinsert tendon insertion, the biologic anchorage of the graft with a bony callus, the absence of bone reaction to wear particles and the possibility to recreate a stable joint are among the advantages of using this bone grafting materials. With a bone allograft, virtually any segmental bone loss can be reconstructed. Bone allografts remain a sound material to work with when dealing with a bone tumor. The surgeon must however anticipate the potential complications by performing an appropriate reconstruction

The authors offer their personal experience with long term results on 71 patients (72 allografts) operated between 1961 and 1990. 23 were large osteoarticular grafts, 28 intercalary grafts and 20 fibular grafts. We used one composite hip endoprosthesis in 1988 after 16cm proximal femur resection due to Ewing sarcoma in a 10 year old girl. From the 23 osteoarticular grafts 14 (60%) are long term survivals including one after fracture salvage. Six had to be removed due to infection. From the 28 intercalary grafts 16 (57%) are surviving over 15 years. Infection occurred in 6 patients with chemotherapy. Two of them had intra-arterial CDDP and one additional radiation. All of the proximal humerus allograft had complete resorption of the proximal head within 3 years. The diaphyseal reconstructions with additional cancellous autografts incorporated within 3 years. The patient with the composite stem had two cup revisions, but the stem is doing well and we observed only a mild osteolysis at the proximal part of the graft between the 2nd and 5th year that remains stable. Fractures of the graft can be salvaged in most cases. Infection leads to the removal of the graft in almost all cases. Factors influencing the survival, remodeling and complications of the grafts are discussed. The regime of cryopreservation, fixation and loading of the graft influence these factors together with the use of autologous bone chips around the allograft-host junction as well as the application of chemotherapy or radiation. Fracture of the graft can be salvaged in most cases in contrary to infection that remains the most severe complication that can occur at any time period. Even with the improvement of tumor endoprostheses the use of allografts remains an optional solution especially in young patients

Haemangioendothelioma of bone is a rare intermediate grade malignancy. Because of its rareness there is a lack of information in the literature about the well established treatment strategies depending on series with large numbers. The outcome of wide resection with postoperative external irradiation would be presented. 4 patients (2 females, 2 males) with a mean age of 40.5 (26–52) with solitary haemangioendothelioma of bone admitted with local pain on the affected bone and limited restriction of function. Anatomical sites were scapula, calcaneum, midshaft of radius and metaphysodiaphyseal region of femur. Plain X-ray, CT, MRI, Tc 99 tecnetium wholebody bone scan investigations were applied. All lesions were hot on bone scan and lytic irregular permeative lesions T1 hypo, T2 hyper with gadolinium enhancement were present. Open biopsy resulted with the diagnosis of intermediate haemangioendothelioma of bone. Wide resection of tubular bones and intercalary lyophilised allograft recostruction with IM rod and cerclage wire and total calcaneum resection and allograft replacement with talar arthrodesis, total scapulectomy subsequent autoclaved bone reimplantation were the surgical procedures applied. Mean follow-up was 96 months (40–132). Three patients except scapula case received 50 Gy external irradiation. No patient developed local recurrence in the follow up. Regarding complications calcaneum patient developed skin necrosis after the irradiation which led to removal of the allograft but eventually healed. Scapula patient had late infection treated by antibiotics. All patients had satisfactory function. Intercalary allografts united in 6 months time. Calcaneum patient developed multiple small lung metastasis 1 year after the operation and treated by adriamycin based chemotherapy and interpherone. The lung lesions showed slight regression but the patient is alive since 112 months with no further relapse. Wide excision with subsequent irradiation and wide excision of total scapula resulted with no local recurrence in our small group of patients with this rare malignancy. Irradiation provided relatively less soft tissue sacrification and a sufficient local tumour control without risking the patient to an impending amputation in the occurence of local recurrence

In countries where Confucianism is popular, it is extremely difþcult to get allograft. Twenty seven cases of limb salvage with recycled autogenous bone were performed after wide resection of malignant tumors. Recycling was done in 9 cases with pasteurization and in 18 cases with irradiation. Pasteurization was done in 60¡-30minutes with thermostatic saline bath. Irradiation was performed in sterile plastic jar þlled with saline. 25 Gy radiation was given þrst anteroposteriorly and then another 25Gy posteroanteriorly. Internal þxation was done either with plate and/or intramedullay nail, and in 13 cases, intramedullary packing of bone cement was added. Among 9 pasteurized cases, 5 were intercalary diaphyseal resection, 2 whole bone resection of metatarsals, and 2 prosthesis-pasteurized bone composite arthroplasty. Among 18 irradiated cases, 12 were osteoarticular, and 6 intercalary resections. Follow-up period was 16 to 112 months (mean: 46 months). There was no recycled bone-related local recurrence. Time for union varied greatly.(4 to 14 months). There was no statistical difference in union time between pasteurized and irradiated bone (Wilcoxon rank test). Complications were 9 delayed or non-union, 3 fractures of recycled bone, and 2 cases of separation-resorption of growth plate. Irradiation seems much better than pasteurization because it could preserve mechanical property of articular cartilage and soft tissues such as tendon and capsule. We recommend intraoperative-extracorporeal irradiation as a good substitute for osteoarticular allograft because soft tissue attachment could be saved. Intramedullary packing of bone cement was proved as a good method to enhance the stability of þxation and to prevent fracture

Introduction: Osteochondral reconstruction following tumour resections has a high complication rate. We hypothesized that the vascularised fibular graft as a supplement to the allograft reconstruction following tumour resections would provide a biological solution. Purpose of the study: A prospective study of the results of patients receiving large fragment allografts and vascularised fibular grafts following tumour resections around the hip and the knee. Patients and methods: 18 patients underwent resection of primary malignant bone tumors followed by reconstruction with large fragment allograft and vascularised fibular graft. 8 patients underwent resection arthrodesis of the hip, six underwent resection arthrodesis of the knee and five underwent intercalary resections around the knee followed by a large fragment allograft and vascularised fibular graft reconstruction to span the gap left by resection. The patients were assessed clinically (MSTS scoring system) and radiologically at regular intervals. Results: There were 14 males and 4 females, with a mean age of 26 years (12–70). Mean follow-up was 65 months (8–144). Five patients died of metastatic disease but without local recurrence. In six of the patients with resection arthrodesis of the hip, there was evidence of fracture of the allograft but without the failure of the construct. One fibula fractured but eventually healed uneventfully. There were no cases of non-union in cases of intercalary resections. All the patients scored good or excellent in the MSTS scoring system. Discussion: Our experience clearly indicates that tumour resection followed by reconstruction with large fragment allograft and vascularised fibular graft is a useful limb salvage procedure providing a biological long-term solution with superior results when compared to prosthetic reconstruction

We assessed the usefulness of vascularized bone transfer for treatment of aggressive musculoskeletal tumours. Classification by reconstruction method with vascularized bone transfer of our 33 patients was made into five types: 1) intercalary type in 6 cases, 2) arthrodesis type in 5 cases, 3) arthroplasty type using fibular head in 8 cases, 4) hybrid type with recycling autograft as heat treated bone or irradiated bone in 4 cases, and 5) inlay type after curettage of benign tumour chiefly for femoral head and/or neck in 10 cases. From October 1975 to December 1999, 33 patients composed of 18 males and 15 females with age ranging from 9 to 69 years (average of 30 years) received vascularized bone transfer. There were 28 cases of bone tumour and 5 cases of soft tissue tumour. In 31 cases we grafted the fibula of 8 to 20 cm in size and in 2 cases the ileum of 8 cm in size. Postoperative follow-up period ranged from 10 months to 15 years with average of 65 months. Primary union was achieved in 31 cases postoperatively between 1.5 month and 4 months with average of 3 months. As complication, we observed fracture of the graft in 4 cases and local recurrence in 3 cases. Postoperative functional evaluation ranged from 33.3% to 96.7% with average of 76.7%. As for oncological therapeutic results, continuous disease free cases accounted for 27, case of no evidence of disease for 1, case alive with disease for 1, and cases of death of disease for 4. Intercalary transfer of vascularized bone is best indicated for defect of long bone. Arthrodesis was performed in only one knee joint where reconstruction with prosthesis is usually indicated. In arthroplasty type, remodeling of fibular head was observed. In hybrid type, rapid bone union and low complication rate can be expected when compared to recycling autograft alone. In inlay type, femoral head necrosis even after wide curettage can be prevented

Indications for removal of well-fixed cementless femoral components include infection, improper femoral height/offset/anteversion, and fracture. More recently, removal of well-fixed but recalled femoral components that are associated with adverse local tissue reaction (ALTR) has created a new indication for this procedure. The goal in all cases is to preserve bone stock and soft-tissue attachments to the greatest extent possible during implant removal. The strategy for implant removal depends to a large extent on the type of implant to be removed. Implants with limited proximal fixation can often be removed from the top using narrow osteotomes. Implants with more extensive fixation typically require more extensive exposure. When performing an extended trochanteric osteotomy, plan for the bone flap length based on measurement from the tip of the greater trochanter. Instead of devascularising the lateral bone flap, be sure to preserve the quadriceps attachment to the bone flap, exposing the lateral femur only where the transverse and posterior osteotomies are planned. The anterior osteotomy can be performed using a dotted line of osteotomes trans-muscularly as described by Heinz Wagner. Placement of a prophylactic cerclage below the osteotomy is prudent. Most importantly, if the need for a transfemoral exposure is likely, it should be performed primarily so that the posterior capsule and short rotators can be preserved. There is no need to perform a full posterior exposure and then to secondarily perform a transfemoral exposure since the former is unnecessary if the latter is performed. Discrete, limited fixation of the lateral bone flap proximally and distally should be performed to prevent strangulation of the living bone flap during the refixation process. The transfemoral technique can be applied not only to removal of well-fixed devices but also for conversion from hip fusion and for Z-shortening of the femur during Crowe 4 reconstruction instead of using a transverse osteotomy and intercalary shortening

Aim. Bone metastases of the upper limb are a frequent complication of primary tumors. The aim of this study is to evaluate treatment and functional results of patients with prosthetic reconstruction of the proximal humerus. Method. Between 1975 and 2007, 67 patients were treated by resection of humeral metastasis and reconstruction with prosthesis. Cemented modular prostheses of the proximal humerus were implanted in 59 cases (all MRS Bioimpianti® prostheses), uncemented prostheses in 2 (HMRS® Stryker), 4 elbow Coonrad-Morrey prostheses (in 2 cases with bone allograft), 1 elbow custom-made cemented and 1 intercalary prosthesis (Osteobridge Merete®). Sites of primary tumors: kidney (23), lung (13), bone and unknow (7 each), liver and breast (3 each), bladder, endometrium, thyroid, soft tissues and nervous tissues (2 each), ovarium (1). Complications were evaluated and univariate analysis with actuarial Kaplan-Meier curves of implant survival was performed. Functional results were assessed with the MSTS system. Results. At mean follow-up 27 months oncologic outcome showed 7 patients NED (mean time 7 yrs.), 57 DOD, 3 lost to follow-up. Complications were deep infection (2 cases, 3%) and loosening (1 case, 1.5%) causing failure requiring revision. Functional results were good or excellent in 93% of patients, with average score of 71%. Conclusion. Resection of metastatic lesion is indicated: 1) for patients with solitary metastases and long free interval from treatment of primary cancer, 2) for patients with meta-epiphyseal metastases not amenable to durable internal fixation even in presence multiple metastases. Indications of resections are increasing, due to prolonged survival with newer medical treatments. Different reconstructive techniques are available, depending on type of resection and soft tissues removal. Cemented prostheses are mostly used, since cemented fixation is not affected by radiotherapy. Although prognosis was poor, prosthetic reconstructions of the humerus provided satisfactory results

Introduction: Bone transport, or distraction osteogenesis, is a recognised technique to reconstruct extensive bony defects resulting from excision of bony tumours. Ilizarov demonstrated bone formation under tension allowing the movement of a free segment of living bone to fill intercalary defects. This study assesses the use of bone transport in the management of patients with resectable long bone tumours. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent bone transport in two institutions, performed by a single surgeon. A total of 14 patients were included in the study. There were 11 males and 3 females. Histological results demonstrated osteosarcoma (n=7), Ewing’s sarcoma (n=6), and parosteal chondrosarcoma (n=1). The site of the tumour was the femur and tibia in 8 and 6 cases respectively. Results: Bone transport was fully completed in 9 patients. Of the 5 patients remaining, 3 are currently in cast, 1 is currently undergoing tibial lengthening, and 1 patient died from local recurrence and distant spread of disease. The average length of bone resected in the tibia was 11 cm (range 8–15 cm), while in the femur the average was higher at 16.5 cm (range 12–27 cm). All patients underwent autologous bone grafting of their docking site from either the anterior or posterior iliac crest on the ipsilateral side. The average time in frame was 24.8 months. One patient undergoing tibial bone transport fell and sustained an ipsilateral supracondylar femoral fracture which was successfully treated with an external ring fixator. Discussion: Bone transport is a recognised method of reconstructing extensive bony defects and is beneficial for patients with a good prognosis. It is a specialised technique and requires a multidisciplinary approach. Other techniques can be less time consuming however distraction osteogenesis avoids the complications associated with prosthetic or allograft replacements

INTRODUCTION: Diaphyseal aseptic nonunions are challenging complications in forearm fractures, as length imbalance of radius and ulna impairs severely its function. The aim of this study is to report the results of a series of patients operated on by an original technique. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 60 patients aged 17–72 years (mean 35) were treated between 1980 and 2000. Ten patients presented radius nonunion, 37 ulna non-union, and 13 nonunion of both bones. Nonunions occurred after conservative treatment in 8 cases, after one surgical procedure of plating or nailing in 47 cases and after 2 or more surgical procedures in 5 cases. Surgical treatment occurred at mean 36 months after the fracture and consisted of freshening the bone and applying a plate and an opposite cortical bone allograft; in 17 cases omologous intercalary bone graft was applied to restore length, axial and rotational alignment. Postoperative treatment consisted of functional bracing associated with intensive rehabilitation of the elbow and wrist beyond clinical and radiographic union. Average follow up was 15±7 years. RESULTS:. One implant failed due to infection, requiring additional surgery. Mean elbow ROM was 122°±18. Compared with the contralateral arm, mean loss of wrist ROM was 20°±17. Mean loss of forearm rotation was 25°±15. Average healing time was 14±4 weeks X-ray analysis showed bone healing and good osteointegration of the graft in all cases. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Combining a plate and an opposite massive cortical bone graft resulted to be a very effective technique for surgical treatment of forearm nonunions