Introduction. Pelvic and acetabular injuries are relatively rare and surgical reconstruction usually occurs only in specialist centres. As part of their work up there is a local protocol for radiological investigations including Judet oblique views for acetabular fractures, pelvic inlet and outlet for pelvic ring fractures and urethrograms for sustaining anterior pelvic injury. The aim of this service evaluation was to assess whether patients had these radiological investigations prior to transfer. Methods. The last 50 patients transferred for surgery were evaluated (41 male, 9 female), average age 48 (range 17–86). Four were excluded as original radiology not available and one due to non-acute presentation. Regional PACS systems were accessed and radiological investigations recorded. Results. Transfers were from 17 different hospitals including 27 acetabular fractures, 17 pelvic ring fractures and one patient with both. 22 patients sustained isolated injuries. 16 patients were investigated radiologically asstipulated in the protocol. No inlet/outlet views were performed for 10 of the ring fractures, and no Judet views for eight of the acetabular fractures. An antero-posterior pelvic radiograph was not performed on one patient. No urethro/cystogram was performed for 10 pelvic ring fractures. Average time to transfer 5.4 days (range 0–22). Discussion. A significant proportion of patients are not assessed as per protocol prior to transfer. This can lead to undetected injuries, delays to diagnosis or definitive management and increased morbidity/mortality. The reasons for not being able to perform these investigations need to be understood

We investigated whether lateral compression type I injuries of the pelvic ring are inheritably mechanically stable. Between January 2005 to January 2007 all consecutive admissions of a tertiary referral center for pelvic ring reconstruction with a LC I injury pattern were eligible for inclusion. Exclusion criteria were other patterns of pelvic ring injuries. All patients underwent radiological assessment including AP pelvis, inlet/outlet views and CT. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, other associated injuries, ISS, length of hospitalisation, type of operation, mode of mobilization, preoperative and postoperative visual analogue score pain VAS and follow up until fracture union were prospectively documented. Mechanical stability of the pelvic ring was assessed in the operating theatre under general anaesthesia. Instability was defined as displacement > 2 cm of the anterior or posterior elements. The minimum follow up was 12 months. Of 210 patients admitted with pelvic fractures, 40 fulfilled the inclusion criteria (LC1 type). There were 23 female 17 male and with a mean age of 33.5 (range 18–68). The mean ISS was 10 (range 9–19). 23 patients (group 1) were found to have more than 2 cm rotational displacement during EUA and were stabilised with SI screws posteriorly and a combination of retro-pubic screws, external fixator or plating anteriorly. 17 patients (group 2) exhibited minimal displacement less than 5mm and were not stabilised. Rotational instability > 2cm was characterised by complete fracture of the sacrum posteriorly. Stabilisation of the pelvic ring in group I was associated with a significant reduction of the VAS within 72 hours from surgery, early ambulation and discharge from the hospital. This study supports the view that not all LCI fracture patterns are mechanically stable. Examination under anaesthesia of the pelvic ring can assist the clinician in the decision making progress

Aim: To investigate whether lateral compression type I injuries of the pelvic ring are inheritably mechanically stable. Patients and Methods: Between January 2005 to January 2007 all consecutive admissions of a tertiary referral center for pelvic ring reconstruction with a LC I injury pattern were eligible for inclusion. Exclusion criteria were other patterns of pelvic ring injuries. All patients underwent radiological assessment including AP pelvis, inlet/outlet views and CT. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, other associated injuries, ISS, length of hospitalisation, type of operation, mode of mobilization, preoperative and postoperative visual analogue score pain VAS and follow up until fracture union were prospectively documented. Mechanical stability of the pelvic ring was assessed in the operating theatre under general anaesthesia. Instability was defined as displacement > 2 cm of the anterior or posterior elements. The minimum follow up was 12 months. Results: Out of 210 patients admitted with pelvic fractures, 40 fulfilled the inclusion criteria (LC1 type). There were 23 female 17 male and with a mean age of 33.5 (range 18–68). The mean ISS was 10 (range 9–19). 23 patients (group 1) were found to have more than 2 cm rotational displacement during EUA and were stabilised with SI screws posteriorly and a combination of retropubic screws, external fixator or plating anteriorly. 17 patients (group 2) exhibited minimal displacement less than 5mm and were not stabilised. Rotational instability > 2cm was characterised by complete fracture of the sacrum posteriorly. Stabilisation of the pelvic ring in group I was associated with a significant reduction of the VAS within 72 hours from surgery, early ambulation and discharge from the hospital. Conclusion: This study supports the view that not all LCI fracture patterns are mechanically stable. Examination under anaesthesia of the pelvic ring can assist the clinician in the decision making progress

Because there are a number of complicating factors, total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed following acetabular fractures has a less favourable prognosis than when done for primary degenerative arthritis. Patients who have had ace-tabular fracture and present for consideration of THA need careful clinical and radiological assessment. Investigation should include AP and lateral radiographs, 45° inlet/outlet views, obturator and iliac obliques, Judet views and CT scan, with or without 3D reconstruction. There are various classifications defining whether the bone deficiency is contained or uncontained and the extent of the structural defect. Treatment options include autograft, allograft together with mesh, screws, plates, rings, cages, etc. It is probably preferable to undertake THA sooner (as soon as there is radiological evidence of incongruent articular surfaces) rather than later, as this reduces the delay between fracture and recovery from THA, and any inadequate reduction can be minimised or corrected. The surgical approach must allow adequate access for the intended reconstruction. Small contained or uncontained defects can be treated with cemented or cementless implants and limited grafting. Large defects require structural reinforcement, bone grafting, a retaining cage and, unless a custom-made implant is used, cemented fixation. Potential problems at the time of surgery include sciatic nerve injury (beware the ‘double crush syndrome’) obstructive hardware, heterotopic ossification, avascular necrosis of the acetabulum and occult infection. Patients who are elderly or who present with markedly impacted fracture, extensive abrasion or fracture of the femoral head, displaced femoral neck fracture, and extensive acetabular comminution in the presence of osteopoenic bone, may warrant acute management with THA. Early experience of THA in the treatment of selected acute fractures is encouraging. However, the clinical results of THA after fractures of the acetabulum are often disappointing, and there is no current evidence that open reduction and internal fixation improves the success of the subsequent THA. THA following acetabular fractures is a challenging procedure with a high complication rate. Appropriate investigation and preoperative planning reduces the risk of complications

The October 2015 Trauma Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: PCA not the best in resuscitation; Impact of trauma centre care; Quality of life after a hip fracture; Recovery and severity of injury: open tibial fractures in the spotlight; Assessment of the triplane fractures; Signs of an unstable paediatric pelvis; Safe insertion of SI screws: are two views required?; Post-operative delirium under the spotlight; Psychological effects of fractures; K-wires cost effective in DRAFFT