I never considered this to be a significant problem if it is noticed. (back to that later)

Aaron Rosenberg's report seems to have agreed, but at the last members meeting of the Knee Society, Boston, September 2009, others had experience that contradicted my view.

With their experience, ultimately the results were very substantially compromised. This video and presentation show you how to avoid a bad result, actually obtain a perfect result, if you or your student assistant, resident or fellow, bags the MCL.

There are three important points. (1) One needs to recognise the occurrence. (2) The setting is usually varus and so direct end-to-end repair cannot be depended upon. (3) Use of a semitendinosis tenodesis, together with an imperfect, distracted direct repair works perfectly well!

(1) Recognition: The setting is usually varus, but I have had one case in which the chief resident, working with the fellow succeeded in getting the MCL in a valgus knee! In this usually tight varus setting the key feature is that at some point in the case, before component placement, one notices that the exposure is all of a sudden better! Now, the guilty resident or just a passive assisting resident/fellow will usually disagree. The extension space is not so obviously lax, but the flexion space is. Secondly, you do not feel an intact ligament in flexion. And, to prove it I have had to do a little more exposure of the superficial MCL to show the tear. There are at least three mechanisms. Most common is a saw cut. Next is possibly injury with the scalpel or cutting cautery during exposure, and last is damage essentially pre-operatively by a very sharp medial osteophyte which has thoroughly abraded the ligament.

Laxity in full flexion is not necessarily obvious as the posterior capsular integrity helps hide the instability. Again, the really intact ligament is well felt, and in the situation of laceration, the tibia pulls forward more on the medial side, the medial flexion space opens, and what was usually a tight exposure gets suddenly better.

(2) When varus is the setting, I have found it impossible or at least uncomfortable to depend upon direct repair. When the soft tissues are needing to be released or simply undergoing more stress than usual and a lot more than on the lateral side, I see it as unwise to expect or depend upon only a medial repair to hold.

(3) The semitendinosis tenodesis has worked essentially perfectly in every one of my cases. These patients have had no post-operative instability and they have had better than average to extremely good ROM.

A presumably key point is not to alter the patient's post-operative regimen! And, to avoid some passive alteration of PT, I advise specifically that the surgeon or those in his/her team do not mention the occurrence to the patient, the family or the PT! I put the whole story in the op-note, and weeks later I will specifically tell the patient what the staple in place is all about.

I never considered this to be a significant problem if it is noticed. (back to that later)

Aaron Rosenberg's report seems to have agreed, but at the last members' meeting of the Knee Society, Boston, September 2009, others had experience that contradicted my view.

With some experience, ultimately the results were very substantially compromised. This video and presentation show you how to avoid a bad result, actually obtain a perfect result, if you or your student assistant, resident or fellow, bags the MCL.

There are three important points. (1) One needs to recognise the occurrence. (2) The setting is usually varus and so direct end-to-end repair cannot be depended upon. (3) Use of a semitendinosis tenodesis, together with an imperfect, distracted direct repair works perfectly well! (1)

Recognition: The setting is usually varus, but I have had one case in which the chief resident, working with the fellow succeeded in getting the MCL in a valgus knee! In this usually tight varus setting the key feature is that at some point in the case, before component placement, one notices that the exposure is all of a sudden better! Now, the guilty resident or just a passive assisting resident/fellow will usually disagree. The extension space is not so obviously lax, but the flexion space is. Secondly, you do not feel an intact ligament in flexion. And, to prove it I have had to do a little more exposure of the superficial MCL to show the tear. There are at least three mechanisms. Most common is a saw cut. Next is possibly injury with the scalpel or cutting cautery during exposure, and last is damage essentially pre-op by a very sharp medial osteophyte which has thoroughly abraded the ligament.

Laxity in full flexion is not necessarily obvious as the posterior capsular integrity helps hide the instability. Again, the really intact ligament is well felt, and in the situation of laceration, the tibia pulls forward more on the medial side, the medial flexion space opens, and what was usually a tight exposure gets suddenly better.

A presumably key point is not to alter the patient's post-operative regimen! And, to avoid some passive alteration of PT, I advise specifically that the surgeon or those in his/her team do not mention the occurrence to the patient, the family or the PT! I put the whole story in the op-note, and weeks later I will specifically tell the patient what the staple in place is all about.

To evaluate the functional outcome of open humerus diaphyseal fractures treated with the Three-stitch technique of antegrade humerus nailing. This is a retrospective study conducted at the Department of Orthopaedics in D. Y. Patil University, School of Medicine, Navi Mumbai, India. The study included 25 patients who were operated on from January 2019 to April 2021 and follow-ups done till May 2022. Inclusion criteria were adult patients with open humerus diaphyseal fractures (Gustilo-Anderson Classification). All patients with closed fractures, skeletally immature patients, and patients with associated head injury were excluded from the study. All patients were operated on with a minimally invasive Three-stitch technique for antegrade humerus nailing. All patients were evaluated based on DASH score. Out of the 25 patients included in the study, all patients showed complete union. The mean age of the patients was 40.4 years (range 23–66 years). The average period for consolidation of fracture was 10.56 weeks (range 8–14 weeks). The DASH score ranged from 0 to 15.8 with an average score of 2.96. Five patients reported complications with three patients of post-operative infection and delayed wound healing and two patients with screw loosening. All complications were resolved with proper wound care and the complete union was noted. None of the patients had an iatrogenic neurovascular injury. Three-stitch antegrade nailing technique is a novel method to treat diaphyseal humerus fractures and provides excellent results. It has various advantages such as minimal invasiveness, minimal injury to the rotator cuff, fewer infection rates, minimal iatrogenic injuries, and good functional outcomes. Therefore, this treatment modality can be effectively used for open humerus diaphyseal fractures

Several studies have evaluated the risk of peroneal nerve (PN) injuries in all-inside lateral meniscal repair using standard knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with the 30 degrees flexed knee position which is different from the knee position during actual arthroscopic lateral meniscal repair. The point of concern is “Can the risk of PN injury using standard knee MRIs be accurately determined”. To evaluate and compare the risk of PN injury in all-inside lateral meniscal repair in relation to both borders of the popliteus tendon (PT) using MRIs of the two knee positions in the same patients. Using axial MRI studies with standard knee MRIs and figure-of-4 with joint fluid dilatation actual arthroscopic lateral meniscal repair position MRIs, direct lines were drawn simulating a straight all-inside meniscal repair device from the anteromedial and anterolateral portals to the medial and lateral borders of the PT. The distance from the tip of each line to the PN was measured. If a line touched or passed the PN, a potential risk of iatrogenic injury was noted and a new line was drawn from the same portal to the border of the PN. The danger area was measured from the first line to the new direct line along the joint capsule. In 28 adult patients, the closest distances from each line to the PN in standard knee MRI images were significantly shorter than arthroscopic position MRI images (all p-values < 0.05). All danger areas assessed in the actual arthroscopic position MRIs were included within the danger areas as assessed by the standard knee MRIs. We found that the standard knee MRIs can be used to determine the risk of peroneal nerve injury in arthroscopic lateral meniscal repair, although the risks are slightly overestimated

Background. Open subtalar arthrodesis has been associated with a moderate rate of non-union, as high 16.3%, and high rates of infection and nerve injury. Performing this operation arthroscopically serves to limit the disruption to the soft tissue envelope, improve union rates and reduce infection. Our study describes our outcomes and experience of this operation. Method. Retrospective review of all patients who underwent an arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis between 2023 and 2008. We excluded patients undergoing concurrent adjacent joint arthrodesis. The primary aim was to report on rates of union. Secondary outcomes included reporting on conversion to open procedure, duration of surgery, infection, and iatrogenic injury to surrounding structures. Results. 135 patients were included in the final analysis. 129 patients (95.5%) achieved union. The median time to fusion was 98 days. All cases were performed through sinus tarsi portals. 38 cases were performed with an additional posterolateral portal. Most cases (107/77%) were performed with 2 screws. 3 cases (2.2%) were converted to open procedures. The median tourniquet time was 86 minutes but available in only 88 (65%) cases. There were 4 (2.9%) superficial infections and no deep infections. 1 patient sustained an injury to FHL and there were no reported nerve injuries. Conclusions. At present this is the largest series of arthroscopic subtalar arthrodeses. We demonstrate that this operation can achieve high rates of union with low rates of infection with an equally low likelihood of needing to convert to an open procedure with modest operative times. In our experience the addition of a posterolateral portal does not appear to increase the incidence of nerve injury and aids in the visualisation of all 3 facets

Recent literature has demonstrated that conventional arthroscopic techniques do not adequately visualise areas of predilection of pathology of the long head of biceps (LHB) tendon and are associated with a 30–50% rate of missed diagnoses. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, effectiveness and ease of performing biceps tenoscopy as a novel strategy for reducing the rate of missed diagnoses. Five forequarter amputation cadaver specimens were studied. The pressure in the anterior compartment was measured before and after surgical evaluation. Diagnostic glenohumeral arthroscopy was performed and the biceps tendon was tagged to mark the maximum length visualised by pulling the tendon into the joint. Biceps tenoscopy was performed using 3 different techniques (1. Flexible video-endoscopy, 2. Standard arthroscopy via Neviaser portal. 3. Standard arthroscope via antero-superior portal with retrograde instrumentation). Each was assessed for safety, ease of the procedure and whether the full length of the extra-articular part of the LHB tendon could be visualised. The t-test was used to compare the length of the LHB tendon visualised at standard glenohumeral arthroscopy vs that visualised at biceps tenoscopy. An open dissection was performed after the arthroscopic procedures to evaluate for an iatrogenic injury to local structures. Biceps tenoscopy allowed visualisation to the musculotendinous junction in all cases. The mean length of the tendon visualised was therefore significantly greater at biceps tenoscopy (104 mm) than at standard glenohumeral arthroscopy (33 mm) (mean difference 71 mm, p<0.0001). Biceps tenoscopy was safe with regards to compartment syndrome and there was no difference between pre- and post-operative pressure measurements (mean difference 0 mmHg, p=1). No iatrogenic injuries were identified at open dissection. Biceps tenoscopy allows excellent visualisation of the entire length of the LHB tendon and therefore has the potential to reduce the rate of missed diagnoses. This study did not demonstrate any risk of iatrogenic injury to important local structures or any risk of compartment syndrome. Clinical evaluation is required to further validate this technique

Introduction: Injury to the distal third of the axillary artery is well recognised as a complication of proximal humeral fractures. However the risk of iatrogenic injury at shoulder surgery has not, to date, been fully appreciated. Patients: Four female patients aged 59 and over who suffered iatrogenic injury to the axillary artery at the time of shoulder surgery are reported. Two occurred during surgery for planned elective shoulder arthroplasty, while two occurred while treating elderly patients who had previously sustained a 3 part proximal humeral fracture. In all 4 cases the injury probably started as an avulsion of the anterior or posterior humeral circumflex vessels. Results: Vascular surgeons were called in urgently to help with the management of all 4 cases. In two cases the axillary artery was found to have extensive atheroma, was frail and, after initial attempts at end-to-end repair, it became clear that a reversed vein graft was required. Three patients had a satisfactory outcome after reconstruction, while one patient who had previously had local radiotherapy for malignancy, but was now disease free, developed a completely ischaemic upper limb and required a forequarter amputation to save her life. Message: The axillary artery can be very frail in the elderly, is often diseased with atheroma, and is vulnerable to iatrogenic injury at surgery. If injury occurs at surgery, small bulldog clamps should be applied to the cut ends and a vascular surgeon should be called immediately. A temporary arterial shunt should be considered urgently to provide an early return of vascularisation to the limb and to prevent serious complications. The axillary artery is very difficult to repair, and, in our experience may require a vein graft. In addition, distal clearance of the main brachial artery with a Fogarty catheter which is an essential part of the management

Controversy remains regarding the optimal treatment for iatrogenic injury to the medial collateral ligament (MCL) during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Some authors have recommended converting to a prosthesis that provides varus/valgus constraint while others have recommended primary repair. In this study we report the results of a 45 patients who sustained intra-operative MCL injuries during primary TKA that were treated with primary repair. Of 3922 consecutive primary TKA there were 48 (1.2%) intra-operative MCL lacerations or avulsions. One patient was lost and one died before 24-month follow-up. All but one patient underwent primary repair with placement of components without varus/valgus constraint. This left 45 knees with a mean follow up of 89 months (range, 24 – 214 months). The mean HSS knee scores increased from 47 to 85 points (p<0.001). No patients had subjective complaints of instability. No patients had excessive varus/valgus laxity when tested in full extension and 30 degrees of flexion. The range of motion at the time of final follow-up averaged 110 degrees (range, 85 – 130 degrees). Five knees required treatment for stiffness with 4 knees undergoing manipulation under anesthesia and 1 knee undergoing open lysis of adhesions with polyethylene articular surface exchange. Two knees underwent revision for aseptic loosening of the tibial component. In the three knees that underwent open revision, the MCL was noted to be in continuity and without laxity. Primary repair with 6 weeks of post-operative hinged bracing after iatrogenic injury to the MCL during primary TKA was successful at preventing instability although stiffness was seen in approximately 10% of patients. The increased morbidity associated with implantation of a semi-constrained or constrained implant may be unwarranted in this situation

Controversy remains regarding the optimal treatment for iatrogenic injury to the medial collateral ligament (MCL) during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Some authors have recommended converting to a prosthesis that provides varus/valgus constraint while others have recommended primary repair. In this study, we report the results of 45 patients who sustained intra-operative MCL injuries during primary TKA that were treated with primary repair. Of 3922 consecutive primary TKA there were 48 (1.2%) intra-operative MCL lacerations or avulsions. One patient was lost and one died before 24 months follow up. All but one patient underwent primary repair with placement of components without varus/valgus constraint. This left 45 knees with a mean follow up of 89 months (range, 24 to 214 months). The mean HSS knee scores increased from 47 to 85 points (p<0.001). No patients had subjective complaints of instability. No patients had excessive varus/valgus laxity when tested in full extension and 30 degrees of flexion. The range of motion at the time of final follow-up averaged 110 degrees (range, 85 to 130 degrees). Five knees required treatment for stiffness with 4 knees undergoing manipulation under anaesthesia and 1 knee undergoing open lysis of adhesions with polyethylene articular surface exchange. Two knees underwent revision for aseptic loosening of the tibial component. In the three knees that underwent open revision, the MCL was noted to be in continuity and without laxity. Primary repair with 6 weeks of post-operative hinged bracing after iatrogenic injury to the MCL during primary TKA was successful at preventing instability although stiffness was seen in approximately 10% of patients. The increased morbidity associated with implantation of a semi-constrained or constrained implant may be unwarranted in this situation

Controversy remains regarding the optimal treatment for iatrogenic injury to the medial collateral ligament (MCL) during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Some authors have recommended converting to a prosthesis that provides varus/valgus constraint while others have recommended primary repair. In this study we report the results of a 45 patients who sustained intraoperative MCL injuries during primary TKA that were treated with primary repair. Of 3922 consecutive primary TKA there were 48 (1.2%) intraoperative MCL lacerations or avulsions. One patient was lost and one died before 24 months follow up. All but one patient underwent primary repair with placement of components without varus/valgus constraint. This left 45 knees with a mean follow up of 89 months (range, 24–200). The mean HSS knee scores increased from 46.8 to 84.8 points (p<0.001). No patients had subjective complaints of instability. No patients had excessive varus/valgus laxity when tested in full extension and 30 degrees of flexion. The range of motion at the time of final follow-up averaged 110 degrees (range, 85 degrees to 130 degrees). Five knees required treatment for stiffness with 4 knees undergoing manipulation under anesthesia and 1 knee undergoing open lysis of adhesions with polyethylene articular surface exchange. Two knees underwent revision for aseptic loosening of the tibial component. In the three knees that underwent open revision, the MCL was noted to be in continuity and without laxity. Primary repair with 6 weeks of postoperative hinged bracing after iatrogenic injury to the MCL during primary TKA was successful at preventing instability although stiffness was seen in approximately 10% of patients. The increased morbidity associated with implantation of a semiconstrained or constrained implant may be unwarranted in this situation

Objective:. To observe the incidence of intra-operative vascular injuries during anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF). Secondly, management and monitoring of the outcome post vascular injury during ACDF. Methods:. This a prospective study. A review of all spinal patients' records was performed from June 2006 to April 2011. A comprehensive literature review was also utilized. Inclusion criteria – all patients had ACDF post trauma. All non-traumatic cases were excluded. Results:. The study consisted of 55 patients; 15 were females and 40 were males. The age distribution was 23–65 years. Two patients were excluded due to non-traumatic causes. Of the remaining 53 patients, four sustained intra-operative vascular injuries during ACDF surgery. All 4 patients had corpectomies, and one case was an iatrogenic injury. The commonly injured vessel during the ACDF surgery was the left vertebral artery. Haemostatic control was achieved via tamponade and haemostatic agents. The left common carotid was iatrogenically injured in one case and was treated by microvascular repair. Three patients were treated with antiplatelet therapy for three months duration. The patient with an iatrogenic injury was treated with anticoagulation therapy for three months duration. All computerized tomographic angiograms at three months follow up illustrated patent vessels. Conclusion:. There is an increased incidence of intra operative vascular injuries during ACDF associated with corpectomies. It is essential to be aware of the low incidence of intra operative arterial injury during ACDF and to have a management approach, such as tamponade or microvascular repair. Anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy is effective in decreasing the complications of vascular injuries post ACDF

Introduction and Aims: The Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve is placed at risk of iatrogenic injury in the dual incision minimally invasive approach THA. A number of trials have indicated rates of injury up to 30%. This clinical and cadaver study examined the morphology of the nerve in 101 cadaver specimens and in 78 dual incision THA patients. Method: One hundred and one lateral femoral cutaneous nerves of the thigh were dissected in fresh and formalin embalmed specimens. Dissection was limited to the anterior thigh and the branch pattern of the LFCN recorded. Dual incision patients were followed prospectively and examined with regard to LFCN paraesthesia. Results: Despite the variability of the nerve, three basic morphologic patterns emerged. Approximately 55% had a major medial trunk and smaller lateral branch, 30% involved two distinct large branches and 15% had a trifurcation or other pattern. In our clinical series, over 30% of patients experienced paraesthesia and some experienced a burning dysaesthesia in the distribution of the LFCN. Conclusion: Iatrogenic injury to the LFCN is relatively common in the dual incision minimally invasive THA and patients must be informed of such a risk. Based on this study we have slightly modified our incision and approach

Introduction. Soft tissue releases are often required to correct deformity and achieve gap balance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the process of releasing soft tissues can be subjective and highly variable and is often perceived as an ‘art’ in TKA surgery. Releasing soft tissues also increases the risk of iatrogenic injury and may be detrimental to the mechanically sensitive afferent nerve fibers which participate in the regulation of knee joint stability. Measured resection TKA approaches typically rely on making bone cuts based off of generic alignment strategies and then releasing soft tissue afterwards to balance gaps. Conversely, gap-balancing techniques allow for pre-emptive adjustment of bone resections to achieve knee balance thereby potentially reducing the amount of ligament releases required. No study to our knowledge has compared the rates of soft tissue release in these two techniques, however. The objective of this study was, therefore, to compare the rates of soft tissue releases required to achieve a balanced knee in tibial-first gap-balancing versus femur-first measured-resection techniques in robotic assisted TKA, and to compare with release rates reported in the literature for conventional, measured resection TKA [1]. Methods. The number and type of soft tissue releases were documented and reviewed in 615 robotic-assisted gap-balancing and 76 robotic-assisted measured-resection TKAs as part of a multicenter study. In the robotic-assisted gap balancing group, a robotic tensioner was inserted into the knee after the tibial resection and the soft tissue envelope was characterized throughout flexion under computer-controlled tension (fig-1). Femoral bone resections were then planned using predictive ligament balance gap profiles throughout the range of motion (fig-2), and executed with a miniature robotic cutting-guide. Soft tissue releases were stratified as a function of the coronal deformity relative to the mechanical axis (varus knees: >1° varus; valgus knees: >1°). Rates of releases were compared between the two groups and to the literature data using the Fischer's exact test. Results. The overall rate of soft tissue release was significantly lower in the robotic gap-balancing group, with 31% of knees requiring one or more releases versus 50% (p=0.001) in the robotic measured resection group and 66% (p<0.001) for conventional measured resection (table-1) [1]. When comparing as a function of coronal deformity, the difference in release rates for robotic gap-balancing was significant when compared to the conventional TKA literature data (p<0.0001) for all deformity categories, but only for varus and valgus deformities for robotic measured resection with the numbers available (varus: 33% vs 50%, p=0.010; neutral 11% vs 50%, p=0.088, valgus 27% vs 53%, p=0.048). Discussion. Robotic-assisted tibial-first gap-balancing techniques allow surgeons to plan and adjust femoral resections to achieve a desired gap balance throughout motion, prior to making any femoral resections. Thus, gap balance can be achieved through adjustment of bone resections, which is accurate to 1mm/degree with robotics, rather than through manual releasing soft tissues which is subjective and less precise. These results demonstrated that the overall rate of soft tissue release is reduced when performing TKA with predictive gap-balancing and a robotic tensioning system. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Percutaneous Achilles tenotomy is an integral part of the Ponseti technique. Though considered as a simple procedure, many authors have reported serious neurovascular complications that include iatrogenic injury to the lesser saphenous vein, the posterior tibial neurovascular bundle, the sural artery and pseudoaneurysm formation. The authors describe the results of their new tenotomy technique, the ‘Posterior to Anterior Controlled’ (PAC) technique in an attempt to eliminate such complications. This is a prospective study. Infants < 1 year of age with idiopathic clubfoot were taken up for the Ponseti technique of correction. Tenotomy was performed by the ‘PAC’ technique under local anaesthesia if passive dorsiflexion was found to be < 15 degrees. Outcome measures included completeness of the tenotomy (by ultrasonography), improvement in the equinus angle and occurrence of neurovascular complications. 40 clubfeet in 22 patients underwent ‘PAC’ tenotomy. The mean age was 3.5 months. The tenotomy was found to be complete in all cases. The equinus angle improved by an average of 78.5 degrees (range 70–95 degrees), which was statistically significant (p < 0.05, students t test). Mild soakage of the cast with blood was noted in 21 (52.5%) cases. No neurovascular complication was noted. The average follow-up was 12.2 months (range 9–18 months). The ‘PAC’ tenotomy virtually eliminates the possibility of neurovascular damage, maintains the percutaneous nature of the procedure, is easy to learn and can be performed even by relatively inexperienced surgeons safely and effectively as an office procedure under local anaesthesia

Equinus contracture of the ankle due to a tight Gastrocnemius has been implicated in the pathogenesis of a number of foot and ankle conditions. There are numerous described procedures for release of the Gastrocnemius such as the Strayer procedure. Our indications for release are in patients with a symptomatic forefoot and an equinus contracture of 5 degrees or more in extension as defined by the Silfverskiöld test. The release is usually combined with a reconstructive procedure. The advantages of our technique are its simplicity, excellent visualisation of the tendon and sural nerve, good wound healing and patient comfort post-operatively. The procedure can be performed without tourniquet. A 2.5cm incision is made over the medial calf, just distal to the Gastrocnemius muscle indentation. The deep fascia is incised and the edge of the tendon can be visualised. Blunt digital dissection is performed on either side of the tendon to develop a plane. A metal Cusco speculum is inserted to visualise the full width of the tendon. The tenotomy is performed starting medially and the last 5mm of the lateral tendon is left uncut. This reduces the chance of iatrogenic injury to the nerve. The tendon bridge can be left if correction is sufficient, otherwise passive dorsiflexion of the ankle results in completion. Post-operatively, patients are able to mobilise fully with crutches and passive ankle physiotherapy is commenced immediately. We performed 22 MAGS procedures in 17 patients. There were no Sural nerve injuries and no wound complications. All patients were delighted with cosmesis. Average pre-operative equinus contracture with the leg extended was 18 degrees. Average intra-operative correction of 24 degrees was obtained and at 3 months follow-up, all patients were able to dorsiflex past neutral

MIS (minimally invasive surgery) aims to improve cosmesis and facilitate early recovery by using a small skin incision with minimal soft tissue disruption. When using MIS in the forefoot, there is concern about neurovascular and tendon damage and cutaneous burns. The aim of this anatomical study was to identify the structures at risk with the proposed MIS techniques and to determine the frequency of iatrogenic injury. Materials and Methods. 10 paired normal cadaver feet were used. All procedures were performed using a mini C-arm in a cadaveric lab by 2 surgeons: 1 consultant who has attended a cadaveric MIS course but does not perform MIS in his regular practice (8 feet), and 1 registrar who was supervised by the same consultant (2 feet). In each foot, the surgeon performed a lateral release, a MICA (minimally invasive chevron and Akin) procedure for the correction of hallux valgus, and a minimally invasive DMO (distal metatarsal extra-articular osteotomy) procedure. Each foot was then dissected and photographed to identify any neurovascular or tendon injury. Results. The dorsal medial cutaneous and the plantar interdigital nerves were intact in all specimens. There was no obvious damage to the arterial plexus supplying the first metatarsal head. No flexor or extensor tendon injuries were identified. There is a significant learning curve to performing the osteotomy cuts in the desired plane. In the DMO, the dissection also revealed some intact soft tissue at the osteotomy site indicating that the metatarsal heads were not truly floating. Discussion. Although there has been concern regarding neurovascular and tendon injury, our findings indicate minimal risk, which is consistent with reports in the literature. This study also reflects the learning curve. Conclusion. We suggest that training on cadaveric specimens may be advantageous, particularly, with regard to the plane of the osteotomy

Aim: The retrospective evaluation of external fixation as a treatment of choice for fractures of humeral diaphysis. Material – Method: 24 patients with an equal number of fractures of humerus diaphysis (21 closed, 3 open) were treated with external fixation. Time to bony union, the seriousness and type of complications, the clinical, radiological and functional outcome were evaluated. The minimum time of follow up was six months. Results: Excellent 20, good 2, fair 1, poor 1. The cause of fair and poor results was limitation of shoulder motion. 22 fractures united within 2–5 months. Complications were 2 cases of non-union, 3 pin-track infections, 3 remanipulations. There was no case of deep infection at the fracture site and no iatrogenic injury of the radial nerve. Conclusion: The external fixation, used in the treatment of humerus fractures, is a semi-interventional method, easy to apply, well-tolerated by the patient and with very good functional results. It a very good alternative of both the conservative treatment and internal fixation

Aims: Distal humeral shaft fractures are difficult to treat by antegrade humeral nails. In this study we have used a new retrograde nail to treat these fractures. Methods and Material: Since 1997 we have treated 15 extra articular fractures using this device. The nail is introduced through the roof of the olecranon fossa, thus leaving the rotator cuff of the shoulder free from any iatrogenic injury. Proximal rotational stability is maintained by a unique ‘Trio Wire’, which passes through the nail and fans out in the head of the humerus. Distal rotational stability is maintained by the transverse plate. Results: In all cases early pain relief was obtained with return of shoulder and elbow functions. By 6 weeks 98% of patients could perform the majority of daily tasks. No significant complication was noted except a loss of extension of the elbow by 10–15 degrees. Conclusion: This new nail provides stable fixation of difficult distal humeral fractures, even in cases with poor bone quality. Early pain relief with a rapid return of shoulder and elbow functions denote a successful outcome of these operations

Introduction: Vascular injuries associated with limb bone fractures are relatively uncommon. Aim: To determine the mechanisms of injury and evaluate the outcome of combined orthopaedic and vascular injuries. Method: A retrospective review of all patients with vascular injury associated with limb bone fractures between January 1992 and July 2006 was performed. Data collected included demographic details, clinical presentation, assessment, management and outcome. Results: Of 22,340 fractures treated during the 14 years period 36 patients sustained a vascular injury that required surgical intervention. Of those, 18 patients (50%) had a concomitant fractures or other orthopaedic injury this group form the basis of the audit. The median age was 31.1 (range 3–80) years, and 66% were male. Road traffic accidents accounted for 12 injuries (66%), other accidents 4(22%), iatrogenic injury 1(6%), and 1 gunshot injury (6%). Four patients had an associated nerve injury with varying severity. Skeletal fixation preceded vascular repair in most of the cases. Peroperative arterial shunting was not used in any patient. The primary vascular procedures included end-to-end anastamosis 2(11%), bypass grafting 1(6%), interposition vein grafts 8(43%), vein patch 1(6%), direct arterial repair 2(11%), ligation 2(11%), primary amputation 1(6%), reposition of normal course of artery 1(6%). During a 17 months follow-up period, the upper and lower limb preservation rate was 100 and 89%, respectively. Nine patients (50%) were symptom free; three patients (16.6%) had a neurological deficit. Conclusion: Vascular injury is uncommon in the orthopaedic patients. High suspicion and early intervention is essential to optimise outcome and function

The axillary nerve injuries most commonly are observed after trauma such as contusion-stretch, gunshot wound, laceration and iatrogenic injuries. Two of the most commons causes seem to be the glenohumeral dislocation and the proximal humerus fractures. The axillary nerve may sustain a simple contusion, or its terminal elements may be avulsed from the deltoid muscle. Compressive neuropathy in the quadrilateral space also has been reported (quadrilateral space syndrome, Calhill and Palmer, 1983). The axillary nerve injuries incidence represents less than 1% of all nerve injuries. Aim: The purpose of this study was to analyze outcome in patients, who presented with injuries to the axillary nerve. Material and methods: We report a series of 15 cases of axillary nerve lesions, which were operated between 1995 and 2002. These injuries resulted from shoulder injury either with or without fracture and or dislocation. Patients were operated between 3 to 6 months after trauma and an anterior deltopectoral approach was usually followed during surgery. The follow up period ranged from 1 to 8 years. Results: The results were considered as satisfactory in 11 out of 15 axillary nerve lesions. According to clinical examination, of the function of the shoulder and the muscle strength the results were classified as excellent in 5 cases, good in 6 cases and poor in 4 cases. Conclusions: If indicated, nerve repair can lead to useful function in carefully selected patients