I never considered this to be a significant problem if it is noticed. (back to that later) Aaron Rosenberg's report seems to have agreed, but at the last members meeting of the Knee Society, Boston, September 2009, others had experience that contradicted my view. With their experience, ultimately the results were very substantially compromised. This video and presentation show you how to avoid a bad result, actually obtain a perfect result, if you or your student assistant, resident or fellow, bags the MCL. There are three important points. (1) One needs to recognise the occurrence. (2) The setting is usually varus and so direct end-to-end repair cannot be depended upon. (3) Use of a semitendinosis tenodesis, together with an imperfect, distracted direct repair works perfectly well! (1) Recognition: The setting is usually varus, but I have had one case in which the chief resident, working with the fellow succeeded in getting the MCL in a valgus knee! In this usually tight varus setting the key feature is that at some point in the case, before component placement, one notices that the exposure is all of a sudden better! Now, the guilty resident or just a passive assisting resident/fellow will usually disagree. The extension space is not so obviously lax, but the flexion space is. Secondly, you do not feel an intact ligament in flexion. And, to prove it I have had to do a little more exposure of the superficial MCL to show the tear. There are at least three mechanisms. Most common is a saw cut. Next is possibly injury with the scalpel or cutting cautery during exposure, and last is damage essentially pre-operatively by a very sharp medial osteophyte which has thoroughly abraded the ligament. Laxity in full flexion is not necessarily obvious as the posterior capsular integrity helps hide the instability. Again, the really intact ligament is well felt, and in the situation of laceration, the tibia pulls forward more on the medial side, the medial flexion space opens, and what was usually a tight exposure gets suddenly better. (2) When varus is the setting, I have found it impossible or at least uncomfortable to depend upon direct repair. When the soft tissues are needing to be released or simply undergoing more stress than usual and a lot more than on the lateral side, I see it as unwise to expect or depend upon only a medial repair to hold. (3) The semitendinosis tenodesis has worked essentially perfectly in every one of my cases. These patients have had no post-operative instability and they have had better than average to extremely good ROM. A presumably key point is not to alter the patient's post-operative regimen! And, to avoid some passive alteration of PT, I advise specifically that the surgeon or those in his/her team do not mention the occurrence to the patient, the family or the PT! I put the whole story in the op-note, and weeks later I will specifically tell the patient what the staple in place is all about.
I never considered this to be a significant problem if it is noticed. (back to that later) Aaron Rosenberg's report seems to have agreed, but at the last members' meeting of the Knee Society, Boston, September 2009, others had experience that contradicted my view. With some experience, ultimately the results were very substantially compromised. This video and presentation show you how to avoid a bad result, actually obtain a perfect result, if you or your student assistant, resident or fellow, bags the MCL. There are three important points. (1) One needs to recognise the occurrence. (2) The setting is usually varus and so direct end-to-end repair cannot be depended upon. (3) Use of a semitendinosis tenodesis, together with an imperfect, distracted direct repair works perfectly well!
Recognition: The setting is usually varus, but I have had one case in which the chief resident, working with the fellow succeeded in getting the MCL in a valgus knee! In this usually tight varus setting the key feature is that at some point in the case, before component placement, one notices that the exposure is all of a sudden better! Now, the guilty resident or just a passive assisting resident/fellow will usually disagree. The extension space is not so obviously lax, but the flexion space is. Secondly, you do not feel an intact ligament in flexion. And, to prove it I have had to do a little more exposure of the superficial MCL to show the tear. There are at least three mechanisms. Most common is a saw cut. Next is possibly injury with the scalpel or cutting cautery during exposure, and last is damage essentially pre-op by a very sharp medial osteophyte which has thoroughly abraded the ligament. Laxity in full flexion is not necessarily obvious as the posterior capsular integrity helps hide the instability. Again, the really intact ligament is well felt, and in the situation of laceration, the tibia pulls forward more on the medial side, the medial flexion space opens, and what was usually a tight exposure gets suddenly better. When varus is the setting, I have found it impossible or at least uncomfortable to depend upon direct repair. When the soft tissues are needing to be released or simply undergoing more stress than usual and a lot more than on the lateral side, I see it as unwise to expect or depend upon only a medial repair to hold. The semitendinosis tenodesis has worked essentially perfectly in every one of my cases. These patients have had no post-operative instability and they have had better than average to extremely good ROM. A presumably key point is not to alter the patient's post-operative regimen! And, to avoid some passive alteration of PT, I advise specifically that the surgeon or those in his/her team do not mention the occurrence to the patient, the family or the PT! I put the whole story in the op-note, and weeks later I will specifically tell the patient what the staple in place is all about.
To evaluate the functional outcome of open humerus diaphyseal fractures treated with the Three-stitch technique of antegrade humerus nailing. This is a retrospective study conducted at the Department of Orthopaedics in D. Y. Patil University, School of Medicine, Navi Mumbai, India. The study included 25 patients who were operated on from January 2019 to April 2021 and follow-ups done till May 2022. Inclusion criteria were adult patients with open humerus diaphyseal fractures (Gustilo-Anderson Classification). All patients with closed fractures, skeletally immature patients, and patients with associated head injury were excluded from the study. All patients were operated on with a minimally invasive Three-stitch technique for antegrade humerus nailing. All patients were evaluated based on DASH score. Out of the 25 patients included in the study, all patients showed complete union. The mean age of the patients was 40.4 years (range 23–66 years). The average period for consolidation of fracture was 10.56 weeks (range 8–14 weeks). The DASH score ranged from 0 to 15.8 with an average score of 2.96. Five patients reported complications with three patients of post-operative infection and delayed wound healing and two patients with screw loosening. All complications were resolved with proper wound care and the complete union was noted. None of the patients had an
Several studies have evaluated the risk of peroneal nerve (PN) injuries in all-inside lateral meniscal repair using standard knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with the 30 degrees flexed knee position which is different from the knee position during actual arthroscopic lateral meniscal repair. The point of concern is “Can the risk of PN injury using standard knee MRIs be accurately determined”. To evaluate and compare the risk of PN injury in all-inside lateral meniscal repair in relation to both borders of the popliteus tendon (PT) using MRIs of the two knee positions in the same patients. Using axial MRI studies with standard knee MRIs and figure-of-4 with joint fluid dilatation actual arthroscopic lateral meniscal repair position MRIs, direct lines were drawn simulating a straight all-inside meniscal repair device from the anteromedial and anterolateral portals to the medial and lateral borders of the PT. The distance from the tip of each line to the PN was measured. If a line touched or passed the PN, a potential risk of
Background. Open subtalar arthrodesis has been associated with a moderate rate of non-union, as high 16.3%, and high rates of infection and nerve injury. Performing this operation arthroscopically serves to limit the disruption to the soft tissue envelope, improve union rates and reduce infection. Our study describes our outcomes and experience of this operation. Method. Retrospective review of all patients who underwent an arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis between 2023 and 2008. We excluded patients undergoing concurrent adjacent joint arthrodesis. The primary aim was to report on rates of union. Secondary outcomes included reporting on conversion to open procedure, duration of surgery, infection, and
Recent literature has demonstrated that conventional arthroscopic techniques do not adequately visualise areas of predilection of pathology of the long head of biceps (LHB) tendon and are associated with a 30–50% rate of missed diagnoses. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, effectiveness and ease of performing biceps tenoscopy as a novel strategy for reducing the rate of missed diagnoses. Five forequarter amputation cadaver specimens were studied. The pressure in the anterior compartment was measured before and after surgical evaluation. Diagnostic glenohumeral arthroscopy was performed and the biceps tendon was tagged to mark the maximum length visualised by pulling the tendon into the joint. Biceps tenoscopy was performed using 3 different techniques (1. Flexible video-endoscopy, 2. Standard arthroscopy via Neviaser portal. 3. Standard arthroscope via antero-superior portal with retrograde instrumentation). Each was assessed for safety, ease of the procedure and whether the full length of the extra-articular part of the LHB tendon could be visualised. The t-test was used to compare the length of the LHB tendon visualised at standard glenohumeral arthroscopy vs that visualised at biceps tenoscopy. An open dissection was performed after the arthroscopic procedures to evaluate for an
Introduction: Injury to the distal third of the axillary artery is well recognised as a complication of proximal humeral fractures. However the risk of
Controversy remains regarding the optimal treatment for
Controversy remains regarding the optimal treatment for
Controversy remains regarding the optimal treatment for
Objective:. To observe the incidence of intra-operative vascular injuries during anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF). Secondly, management and monitoring of the outcome post vascular injury during ACDF. Methods:. This a prospective study. A review of all spinal patients' records was performed from June 2006 to April 2011. A comprehensive literature review was also utilized. Inclusion criteria – all patients had ACDF post trauma. All non-traumatic cases were excluded. Results:. The study consisted of 55 patients; 15 were females and 40 were males. The age distribution was 23–65 years. Two patients were excluded due to non-traumatic causes. Of the remaining 53 patients, four sustained intra-operative vascular injuries during ACDF surgery. All 4 patients had corpectomies, and one case was an
Introduction and Aims: The Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve is placed at risk of
Introduction. Soft tissue releases are often required to correct deformity and achieve gap balance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the process of releasing soft tissues can be subjective and highly variable and is often perceived as an ‘art’ in TKA surgery. Releasing soft tissues also increases the risk of
Percutaneous Achilles tenotomy is an integral part of the Ponseti technique. Though considered as a simple procedure, many authors have reported serious neurovascular complications that include
Equinus contracture of the ankle due to a tight Gastrocnemius has been implicated in the pathogenesis of a number of foot and ankle conditions. There are numerous described procedures for release of the Gastrocnemius such as the Strayer procedure. Our indications for release are in patients with a symptomatic forefoot and an equinus contracture of 5 degrees or more in extension as defined by the Silfverskiöld test. The release is usually combined with a reconstructive procedure. The advantages of our technique are its simplicity, excellent visualisation of the tendon and sural nerve, good wound healing and patient comfort post-operatively. The procedure can be performed without tourniquet. A 2.5cm incision is made over the medial calf, just distal to the Gastrocnemius muscle indentation. The deep fascia is incised and the edge of the tendon can be visualised. Blunt digital dissection is performed on either side of the tendon to develop a plane. A metal Cusco speculum is inserted to visualise the full width of the tendon. The tenotomy is performed starting medially and the last 5mm of the lateral tendon is left uncut. This reduces the chance of
MIS (minimally invasive surgery) aims to improve cosmesis and facilitate early recovery by using a small skin incision with minimal soft tissue disruption. When using MIS in the forefoot, there is concern about neurovascular and tendon damage and cutaneous burns. The aim of this anatomical study was to identify the structures at risk with the proposed MIS techniques and to determine the frequency of
Aim: The retrospective evaluation of external fixation as a treatment of choice for fractures of humeral diaphysis. Material – Method: 24 patients with an equal number of fractures of humerus diaphysis (21 closed, 3 open) were treated with external fixation. Time to bony union, the seriousness and type of complications, the clinical, radiological and functional outcome were evaluated. The minimum time of follow up was six months. Results: Excellent 20, good 2, fair 1, poor 1. The cause of fair and poor results was limitation of shoulder motion. 22 fractures united within 2–5 months. Complications were 2 cases of non-union, 3 pin-track infections, 3 remanipulations. There was no case of deep infection at the fracture site and no
Aims: Distal humeral shaft fractures are difficult to treat by antegrade humeral nails. In this study we have used a new retrograde nail to treat these fractures. Methods and Material: Since 1997 we have treated 15 extra articular fractures using this device. The nail is introduced through the roof of the olecranon fossa, thus leaving the rotator cuff of the shoulder free from any
Introduction: Vascular injuries associated with limb bone fractures are relatively uncommon. Aim: To determine the mechanisms of injury and evaluate the outcome of combined orthopaedic and vascular injuries. Method: A retrospective review of all patients with vascular injury associated with limb bone fractures between January 1992 and July 2006 was performed. Data collected included demographic details, clinical presentation, assessment, management and outcome. Results: Of 22,340 fractures treated during the 14 years period 36 patients sustained a vascular injury that required surgical intervention. Of those, 18 patients (50%) had a concomitant fractures or other orthopaedic injury this group form the basis of the audit. The median age was 31.1 (range 3–80) years, and 66% were male. Road traffic accidents accounted for 12 injuries (66%), other accidents 4(22%),
The axillary nerve injuries most commonly are observed after trauma such as contusion-stretch, gunshot wound, laceration and