Purpose. A comparison of patient satisfaction of service provided by independent sector treatment centres versus an index NHS hospital in total knee replacement surgery. Methods. Patients were all initially listed for total knee replacement (TKR) by a single consultant from the index NHS hospital, Derbyshire Royal Infirmary (DRI). Patients were sent a postal questionnaire and asked to rate the TKR service provided by a given hospital, based on recent inpatient experience. Questions covered quality of care delivered by hospital staff and quality of ward environment. Overall satisfaction was rated. Patients electing surgery under Patient Choice at an independent sector treatment centre (ISTC) were asked about factors that influenced their hospital choice. 100 consecutive patients undergoing TKR at DRI and 100 patients choosing ISTC hospitals were identified. All surgery occurred between April 2003 and September 2006. Results. Questionnaire response rates were 79% for DRI patients and 54% for ISTC. Overall patient satisfaction for TKR service was 95% for DRI and 87% for ISTC. An equal 61% rated the surgeons as excellent in both DRI and ISTC hospitals. Nurses and physiotherapists (& occupational therapists) both scored more highly in ISTC groups (Nurses 69% v 45%; physio/OT 57% v 35%). Ward environment rated excellent in 73% for ISTC and 24% for DRI. The most common reason for choosing ISTC was shorter waiting list (42%). Conclusion. ISTC hospitals scored more highly in terms of nurses, physiotherapy & occupational therapy, and ward environment. In part, this may arise from better staffing levels and newer facilities in the ISTC sector. Despite this, overall patient satisfaction for TKR service remained greater at the index NHS hospital. This suggests overall satisfaction depends on more complex factors than staff and ward environment. Further work is needed to compare objective clinical outcomes of TKR between hospital groups within the NHS

Independent sector treatment centres (ISTCs) were introduced in October 2003 in the United Kingdom in order to reduce waiting times for elective operations and to improve patient choice and experience. Many concerns have been voiced from several authorities over a number of issues related to these centres. One of these concerns was regarding the practice of ‘cherry-picking’. Trusts are paid according to ‘payment by results’ at national tariffs. The national tariff is an average of costs occurring in an average mix of patients. The assumption is that the higher the co-morbidities of the patients the more likely they are to consume a higher amount of resource and to require a longer length of stay. Cherry-picking may also affect the quality of training available to trainees. This audit was aimed at identifying if, and how much this practice occurs. It also identifies what affect this has on the case-load of patients left for the NHS hospitals. We looked at the number of co-morbidities amongst 198 consecutive patients undergoing hip and knee primary total arthroplasty at an ISTC, a district general hospital whose PCTs provide patient to the ISTC (Doncaster Royal Infirmary - DRI), and a district general hospital in the same area whose PCT did not provide choice at that time and who therefore did not send patients to the ISTC (Bassetlaw District General Hospital - BDGH). We found a statistically significant difference in the number of co-morbidities per patient at the ISTC compared with the DRI (1.23 vs. 2.05) and the ISTC compared with the BDGH (1.23 vs. 1.76). We were unable to show a statistically significant difference between the DRI and the BDGH. We conclude that cherry-picking does take place, and further work should be done to assess the impact on training and finance

Introduction: Elective Orthopaedics has been targeted by the department of health in the U.K. as a maximum six-month waiting time for operations could not be met. National Orthopaedic project was initiated as a consequence and Independent Sector Treatment Centres (ISTC) and well established private hospitals were utilised to treat NHS long wait patients. Materials and Methods: We audited the primary total hip replacements performed in our hospital in 1998 and 2003 to compare the differences in the patient characteristics in particular age, length of stay and ASA grade. Results: The number of hip replacements increased to 308 in year 2003 from 194 in year 1998. Whilst, the number of ASA I patients were the same, the ASA II. III, IV increased by 40%, 260%, 266% respectively. The average length of stay decreased from 14.3 to 11.9 days which was statistically significant, in spite of increased numbers of ASA II – IV patients. Discussion: The NHS hospitals are treating increasing number of patients who have a higher anaesthetic risk and are likely to stay longer in the hospital in the post-operative period. The case mix for primary total hip replacements in large tertiary referral hospitals have changed due to altered patient flow due to cherry picking of NHS waiting lists by the ISTC. NHS hospitals should be appropriately remunerated for dealing with complex cases and for managing complications referred by ISTC hospitals. In fact, the National joint registry’s 2. nd. annual report confirms that 40% of primary total hip replacements operated in ISTC’s were ASA I while only 25% of primary total hip replacements operated in NHS hospitals were ASA I. None of the ISTC’s performed complex primary THRs

Introduction: The emergence of Independent Sector Treatment Centres (ISTCs) in the UK for the provision of elective orthopaedic services began in 2002–3. Within our trust the bulk of elective orthopaedic surgery is performed in an ISTC however there is a small but significant cohort of patients who are deemed not suitable for treatment at the ISTC. Patients with a BMI (body mass index) ≥40 or an ASA (American society of anaesthesiologists) grade of 3 or more are automatically rejected. With increasing levels of obesity and an aging population the size of the reject cohort is going to rise. These patients are then returned to the NHS to be placed on a new (complex elective) waiting list for their surgery. The aim of this study was to assess the early outcomes and complications following primary knee arthroplasty on our high risk patients. Methods: A retrospective review of a consecutive series of 214 primary knee arthroplasties in patients rejected from the ISTC was performed. Data (demographics, ASA grade, BMI, length of stay, complications, range of knee movement and requirement for HDU/ICU) were collected from preoperative assessments, inpatient notes, anaesthetic charts, discharge summaries and follow up clinic letters. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 6 months. Results: 155 (72%) patients were female. 140 (65%) had ASA of 3 or more. 88 (41%) had a BMI of 40 or more. Median length of stay was 8 days (6 to 11 IQR) and did not vary with increasing BMI but increased to 10 days in the ASA 3 and 12 days in the ASA 4 group. There were a total 90 complications in 71 patients. The most common complications were 22 superficial wound infections (10.3%), 11 Pneumonias (5.1%), and 9 symptomatic DVTs (4.2%). There were 16 severe complications (2 Deep infections, 4 PEs, 2 CVAs, 4 acute renal failures and 4 dislocations) in 15 patients. Patients with a BMI < 40 had a total complication rate of 38% (7.9% severe) compared with 26% (5.7% severe) in BMI ≥40 group. Patients with an ASA < 3 had a complication rate of 31% (4.1% severe) vs. 34% (8.6% severe) in patients with an ASA ≥ 3. HDU/ICU beds were required postoperatively for 20 patients (9 planned and 11 unplanned). At six months 72% achieved a knee range of movement ≥ 0 to 90 degrees. Surgeons who performed high volumes of surgery in this difficult group had lower complications then lower volume surgeons. Conclusion: This is one of the largest consecutive groups of high risk patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty. Our results show that elevated BMI does not appear to adversely affect complication rates in knee arthroplasty in our series although ASA grades of 3 and 4 are associated with increased length of stay and complication rates. It is also clear that small groups of surgeons operating on these difficult patients may reduce complications

Purpose. To review the Five year survivorship of Kinnemax TKA performed at the NHS Treatment Cantre, Weston-Super-Mare (WSM), and compare it to a similar cohort from our institution. Introduction. As part of the government's initiative to reduce waiting times for major joint surgery in Wales, the Cardiff and Vale NHS Trust (CAVOC) sent 224 patients (258 knees) to the NHS Treatment Centre in Weston-Super-Mare (WSM) for total knee arthroplasty. Controversy remains as to the unexpectedly high revision rates previously seen. Method. Between April 2004 and January 2006, 224 patients (258 TKAs) were performed at WSM. 90% have been followed up to five years. The WSM Cohort was compared to a similar cohort of 260 consecutive TKAs from CAVOC over a similar time period (2004/5) performed by a number of surgeons. Oxford Knee Score, EQ5D, VAS for pain, re-operation and overall satisfaction were obtained. Statistical testing was performed with chi-squared tests using SPSS v16.0 (a=0.05). Results. Mean age in years at date of operation was 68 (36-85) from WSM and 70 (41 to 87) fromCAVOC. The 5 year cumulative survival rate using ‘revision any cause’ as the endpoint, was 79.9% (95% CI 72.46 to 85.9) in the WSM cohort and 96.4% (95%CI 94.1 to 99.1) in the CAVOC cohort. The relative risk for revision at the ISTC as opposed to the referring centre was 3.76 (p<0.001). The mean Oxford Knee Score was 27.5 (range 2-48) for the WSM cohort. The average, non-revised, oxford knee score for the WSM cohort lower than expected at 29. This is lower than other published series of primary TKA. Conclusion. This is the first published five year survivorship for total knee arthroplasty performed at a first generation ISTC in the UK. Revision rates, functional outcomes, and overall health status results are below expected when compared to a similar cohort from a standard NHS Orthopaedic Unit

Background: Independent Sector Treatment Centres (ISTC) are now providing significant volumes of elective orthopaedic care in the UK. They have been the subject of considerable publicity. The ISTC in Plymouth was the first newly built orthopaedic centre to open. This paper describes the methods of working and analyses the early results of nearly a thousand joint replacements implanted between May 2005 and April 2006. It is the first set of such results to be become available. Methods: Data on each case was collected prospectively and entered into a database. This included demographic information, surgical and implant data, blood loss and transfusion requirements, length of stay, patient satisfaction, readmission rate, complications and mortality. One hundred consecutive postoperative hip replacement x-rays were scored by an independent orthopaedic surgeon. The alignment of one hundred consecutive postoperative knee x-rays was evaluated by long leg views. Comparison is made to published UK and international data. Results: Ongoing. Conclusion: Ongoing

Introduction. We conducted a study of 312 patients undergoing primary hip and knee arthroplasty in 2005. The aim was to identify the correlation between length of stay, ASA (American society of Anaesthesiologist) grade and BMI (Body Mass Index). Method and materials. 312 patients underwent hip and knee arthroplasty in 2005. ASA grade for surgery was documented by the anaesthetist and BMI by the nurses. 67 patients had inadequate documentation. SPSS software was used for analysis. Results. Of the 245 patients; 35 had ASA grade 1, 144 had ASA grade 2, 64 had ASA grade 3 and 2 had ASA grade 4. Mean length of stay for ASA grade 1 was 6.8 days, ASA grade 2 was 9.75 days, ASA grade 3 was 12.5 days and ASA grade 4 was 13.5 days. There was significant positive correlation (p < 0.01) between the ASA grade and post-operative length of stay. BMI was graded as I (<18.5), II (18.5-24.9), III (25-29.9) and IV (>30). There was no correlation (Pearson's correlation coefficient = 0.184) between BMI and post-operative length of stay. Conclusion. As the ASA grade increases the length of stay in hospital increases. ‘Cherry picking’ of ASA grade I and II patients by the ISTC will increase the average length of stay in NHS hospitals resulting in increased cost. Length of stay on its own is not a good indicator of hospital performance