Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 5 of 5
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 104-B, Issue SUPP_5 | Pages 11 - 11
1 Apr 2022
Baumgart R
Full Access

Introduction. Fully implantable distraction nails are frequently used for lengthening of the lower leg. What are the indications for humerus lengthening and which results can be expected?. Materials and Methods. The humerus as the best healing bone in the human body is suitable for lengthening with a nail as well but the indications are rare in comparison with the lower legs. Especially when driving a car or when working on a tablet length discrepancy of the arms of more than 4–5cm may cause severe hardening of the cervical muscles and induce chronical pain in the upper spine. Results. A distraction nail (FITBONE) was used in 5 cases for humerus lengthening. The nail was inserted in all cases from proximal. The mean age of the patients was 34 years. The mean lengthening amount was 58mm (55–100). In one case the system was exchanged to reach the desired length. There was no infection, no radial nerve irritation and no chronical shoulder pain. The system was removed in 4 cases in an average of 15 months the other nail will be removed soon as well. Conclusions. The preliminary results of our 5 cases demonstrate, that the FITBONE device is advantageous for lengthening the humerus, if the initial length is sufficient for implantation. In comparison with the use of external fixators the functional outcome, the comfort of treatment and the cosmetic result is amazing


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_IV | Pages 597 - 597
1 Oct 2010
Marangoz S Herzenberg J Paley D Rovetta L Standard S
Full Access

Introduction: Achondroplasia is a form of rhizomelic dwarfism. Even if patients can compensate for their short arms through the mobility in their spine during the childhood, the flexibility in their spine becomes less with aging. Because of that, as they get older they experience problems in maintaining personal hygiene especially in reaching the back. In addition putting on socks and tying their own shoes might become difficult. Methods: Inclusion criteria included any patient with a history of achondroplasia who had undergone humeral lengthening in the proximal part of the humerus (just distal to deltoid muscle insertion). Patients who had distal humeral (supracondylar) osteotomy and/or who received other than monolateral external fixator were excluded from the study. 50 humeri of 25 patients with achondroplasia were lengthened using Orthofix mono-lateral external fixator utilizing proximal humeral osteotomy. Sixteen patients were female and nine were male. Mean age was 15.4 months (range, 9.6 – 21.8). Lengthening was started at 7th day. Patients were lengthened at 1/4 turn four times a day reaching 1 mm/day. Physical therapy was performed 3 times a week. Goal of lengthening was around 10 cm or whatever length the patient could tolerate. Patients wore Sarmiento type fracture brace 4–6 weeks after the fixator was removed. Results: Mean follow-up time from surgery was 51.5 months (range, 6 – 143 months). Mean follow-up time from removal of external fixator was 44.7 months (range, 0 – 135 months). Average external fixation time was 7.3 months. In 20 humeri it was noted that the average duration of lengthening was 4.2 months (range, 3 – 5.8 months). A mean lengthening of 9.3 cm was obtained (range, 4.3 – 12.8 cm). At latest follow-up range of motion was not compromised due to lengthening. All patients had similar ROM before and after the surgery. Complications included radial nerve palsy in 8, pin tract infection in 7, fracture through regenerate in 3, premature consolidation in 1, nonunion in 1, delayed healing in 1. Radial nerve palsy recovered without intervention in one case. In others it recovered uneventfully after successful decompression. No complications at all occurred in 30 cases. Discussion: Fifty humeri of 25 patients with achondroplasia received successful humerus lengthening as part of extensive limb lengthening offered in our center. None of the patients had long term sequela, and all radial nerve palsies recovered. Patients were satisfied with the lengthening and found it easier to undergo through humerus lengthening compared to lower limb lengthening. After a mean follow-up time of almost 4 years, these patients returned back to their normal lives with optimum upper limb function with no hindrance in maintaining personal hygiene, putting on socks or tying their own shoes


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_IV | Pages 511 - 511
1 Nov 2011
Lädermann A Mélis B Christofilopoulos P Walch G
Full Access

Purpose of the study: Reversed prostheses provide improved active anterior elevation in shoulders free of cuff tears by lengthening the deltoid and increasing is lever arm. The purpose of this work was to search for a correlation between arm lengthening and postoperative active anterior elevation. Material and methods: One hundred eighty-three reversed prostheses were reviewed with minimum one year follow-up for a complete clinical and radiographic work-up. Using a previously validated protocol, arm lengthening was assessed either in comparison with the contralateral side or with preoperative measurements. A statistical analysis was performed to search for a correlation between lengthening of the humerus and the arm with active anterior elevation. Results: Considering the entire series, mean lengthening of the humerus was 0.2±1.4 cm (range −4.7 to +5.4). Postoperative active anterior elevation was 141±27 (range 30–180). There was no correlation between humerus lengthening or shortening and active anterior elevation (p=0.169). A shorter arm produced an active anterior elevation at 121 and 0 – 1 cm lengthening an active anterior elevation at 140; lengthening 1 – 2.5 cm gave active anterior elevation at 144 and beyond 2.5 cm 147. The difference in active anterior elevation was statistically significant (p< 0.001) between patients with a shortening and those with a lengthening. Discussion: Arm lengthening corresponds to a lengthening of the humerus plus a lengthening of the infra-acromial space. We found a statistically negative correlation between arm shortening (and thus deltoid shortening) and active anterior elevation and a positive trend between lengthening and active anterior elevation. Our measurement did not take into account the increased lever arm of the deltoid and thus only partially expresses the improvement in deltoid function. Nevertheless, our study shows that objective evaluation of deltoid lengthening is possible pre- intra- and postoperatively and that this measurement can be correlated with postoperative functional outcome


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 279 - 279
1 Jul 2008
VALENTI P DE WIELDE L KATZ D SAUZIÈRES P
Full Access

Purpose of the study: The aim of this biomechanical study was to assess the performance of the deltoid muscle in the absence of a rotator cuff using different models for shoulder prosthesis. Material and methods: A computer model reproducing the three dimensions of the glenohumeral joint was use to analyze the force of the deltoid muscle during abduction movements in shoulders devoid of a rotator cuff. The three heads of the deltoid were analyzed in order to determine the most effective level of muscle tension. The lever arm of the deltoid was measured from 0–90° abduction. Using this 3D model, we simulated implantation of six different models of reversed prostheses in order to assess the biomechanical situation which would be the most favorable for the deltoid. Performance of the normal deltoid was compared with the performance of the deltoid after implantation of an anatomic prosthesis and after implantation of an reversed prosthesis. Several variables were studied: medial offset of the center of rotation, lateral offset of the humerus, lengthening of the deltoid muscle. Results: Optimal deltoid performance (especially from 60–90° abduction) was observed if the center of rotation was offset medially and the humerus was offset laterally and lowered. A 10% increase in the length of the muscle fibres increased muscle performance 18%. Exaggerated lateral offest of the humerus increased deltoid performance between 30 and 60° abduction but lost its beneficial effect at 90° abduction. From 15° abduction, a scapular notch appeared when the humerus was off set medially. This could be avoided if the humerus was offset laterally with a less medial center of rotation. Beyond 150° abduction, superior impingement appeared irrespective of the type of prosthesis. Discussion and conclusion: This biomechanical study proved the superiority of reversed prostheses compared with anatomic prostheses for massive rotator cuff tears. Medial offset of the center of rotation reduced shear forces on the glenoid. Lateral offset of the humerus increase via a pulley effect the lowering force of the deltoid. Lowering the humerus pulled on the muscle fibers of the deltoid and increased their performance. Dosing these three variables with an appropriate («ideal») design for the reversed prosthesis would optimize deltoid performance in patients with deficient rotator cuffs


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 87-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 104 - 104
1 Apr 2005
Shevtsov V Shchurov V
Full Access

Since the time of Charles Darwin, it is known that three principles of regeneration explain the similarity of neo-formed tissues, the dependence of regeneration rhythm on age and the position of the animal in the evolutionary chain. The latter principle is know as the Weisman-Pschibram principle. Regeneration depends on several factors: level of tissue specialisation and differentiation, tissue resistance to hypoxia, and other manifestations of generally recognised biological regulation. According to a fourth principle, the regenerative potential of different parts of the body depend on a cranio-caudal gradient which rhythms their postnatal growth and development. Distinction of this principle is of importance because of its practical applications. Experience with increasing the height of persons with achrondroplasty by lengthening different limb segments reveals that the femur has less regeneration potential despite its long length. Leg lengthening is preferred; saving muscle function, there is a 20% potential for lengthening. Male subjects are generally considered to be short in height when there is a 10% growth retardation of the longitudinal dimension of the body. In female subjects, generative function is considered deficient if the length of the trunk is less than 73 cm. Using these criteria, experience has shown that leg malformations are not observed in subjects with a 10% growth retardation of the limb. The rate of growth retardation has to reach 40% before growth ceases. The relative moment of posterior leg muscle force increases with increasing leg length (F = 0.063 x L – 0.7; r=0.965, n=123). With a 10% growth deficit, the leg lengthening operation limits the amplitude of ankle movement 15% on average. With the same 10% growth deficit, lengthening the femur with the same technique decreases the amplitude of knee movement 22%. It has been noted that a 40% decrease in leg muscle force after leg lengthening does not affect locomotor function. The same decrease in thigh muscles after femur lengthening alters function. Like the first three principles, the fourth has its exceptions. It is important however to distinguish the influence of biological factors from other, for example technical, factors. Thus orthopaedic surgeons prefer the humerus for lengthening the upper limb, but this results from the difficulty in preserving rotation movements when lengthening the forearm. The important advances obtained in recent years in patients with bony defects of the hand and foot are further arguments clearly in favour of the existence of a cranio-caudal gradient in regenerative potential of the limbs