Aims. Isolated acetabular liner exchange with a highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXLPE) component is an option to address polyethylene wear and osteolysis following total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the presence of a well-fixed acetabular shell. The liner can be fixed either with the original locking mechanism or by being cemented within the acetabular component. Whether the method used for fixation of the HXLPE liner has any bearing on the long-term outcomes is still unclear. Methods. Data were retrieved for all patients who underwent isolated acetabular component liner exchange surgery with a HXLPE component in our institute between August 2000 and January 2015. Patients were classified according to the fixation method used (original locking mechanism (n = 36) or cemented (n = 50)). Survival and revision rates were compared. A total of 86 revisions were performed and the mean duration of follow-up was 13 years. Results. A total of 20 patients (23.3%) had complications, with dislocation alone being the most common (8.1%; 7/86). Ten patients (11.6%) required re-revision surgery. Cementing the HXLPE liner (8.0%; 4/50) had a higher incidence of re-revision due to acetabular component liner-related complications than using the original locking mechanism (0%; 0/36; p = 0.082). Fixation using the original locking mechanism was associated with re-revision due to acetabular component loosening (8.3%; 3/36), compared to cementing (0%; 0/50; p = 0.038). Overall estimated mean survival was 19.2 years. There was no significant difference in the re-revision rate between the original locking mechanism (11.1%; 4/36) and cementing (12.0%; 6/50; p = 0.899). Using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the revision-free survival of HXLPE fixed with the original locking mechanism and cementing was 94.1% and 93.2%, respectively, at ten years, and 84.7% and 81.3%, respectively, at 20 years (p = 0.840). Conclusion. The re-revision rate and the revision-free survival following acetabular component liner exchange revision surgery using the HXLPE liner were not influenced by the fixation technique used. Both techniques were associated with good survival at a mean follow-up of 13 years. Careful patient selection is necessary for isolated acetabular component liner exchange revision surgery in order to achieve the best outcomes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(5 Supple B):59–65

Objectives. Our primary aim was to describe migration of the Exeter stem with a 32 mm head on highly crosslinked polyethylene and whether this is influenced by age. Our secondary aims were to assess functional outcome, satisfaction, activity, and bone mineral density (BMD) according to age. Patients and Methods. A prospective cohort study was conducted. Patients were recruited into three age groups: less than 65 years (n = 65), 65 to 74 years (n = 68), and 75 years and older (n = 67). There were 200 patients enrolled in the study, of whom 115 were female and 85 were male, with a mean age of 69.9 years (sd 9.5, 42 to 92). They were assessed preoperatively, and at three, 12 and, 24 months postoperatively. Stem migration was assessed using Einzel-Bild-Röntgen-Analyse (EBRA). Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Harris Hip Score (HHS), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), EuroQol-5 domains questionnaire (EQ-5D), short form-36 questionnaire (SF-36,) and patient satisfaction were used to assess outcome. The Lower Extremity Activity Scale (LEAS), Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, and activPAL monitor (energy expelled, time lying/standing/walking and step count) were used to assess activity. The BMD was assessed in Gruen and Charnley zones. Results. Mean varus/valgus tilt was -0.77⁰ and axial subsidence was -1.20 mm. No significant difference was observed between age groups (p ⩾ 0.07). There was no difference according to age group for postoperative WOMAC (p ⩾ 0.11), HHS (p ⩾ 0.06), HOOS (p ⩾ 0.46), EQ-5D (p ⩾ 0.38), patient satisfaction (p ⩾ 0.05), or activPAL (p ⩾ 0.06). Patients 75 years and older had a worse SF-36 physical function (p = 0.01) and physical role (p = 0.03), LEAS score (p < 0.001), a shorter TUG (p = 0.01), and a lower BMD in Charnley zone 1 (p = 0.02). Conclusion. Exeter stem migration is within normal limits and is not influenced by age group. Functional outcome, patient satisfaction, activity level, and periprosthetic BMD are similar across all age groups. Cite this article: N. D. Clement, M. Bardgett, K. Merrie, S. Furtado, R. Bowman, D. J. Langton, D. J. Deehan, J. Holland. Cemented Exeter total hip arthroplasty with a 32 mm head on highly crosslinked polyethylene: Does age influence functional outcome, satisfaction, activity, stem migration, and periprosthetic bone mineral density? Bone Joint Res 2019;8:275–287. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.86.BJR-2018-0300.R1

Periacetabular osteolysis in association with well-fixed cementless components was first recognised as a serious clinical problem in the early 1990s. By the mid-1990s, revision surgery for pelvic osteolysis secondary to polyethylene wear was the most common revision hip procedure performed. As a result, new bearing surfaces were introduced in hopes of reducing wear volume and thus reducing pelvic osteolysis. These included highly crosslinked polyethylene, ceramic-on-ceramic and metal-on-metal bearing surfaces. Metal-on-metal has for the most part been eliminated in conventional hip replacement because of the concerns centered around adverse local tissue reactions. Both highly crosslinked polyethylene and ceramic-on-ceramic bearings have been successful in limiting wear and all but eliminating clinically significant osteolysis. Multiple reports on highly crosslinked polyethylene have documented wear rates below the lysis threshold. No reports of revision for wear have been reported despite twenty years of in-vivo use. Of import to the surgeons, all manufacturers commonly used in North America have performed well. In addition, highly crosslinked polyethylene has been relatively insensitive to head size allowing the use of 36mm femoral heads routinely. Similar reports are noted with ceramic-on-ceramic bearings. However, highly crosslinked has dominated the North American market because it is a relatively forgiving bearing surface and comes at a lower cost. Currently, there is a trend towards the use of ceramic femoral heads – not because of wear concerns, but concerns related to taper corrosion and large cobalt-chrome femoral heads

Key Points:. Historically, 22.25, 26, 28, or 32 mm metal femoral heads were used in primary total hip arthroplasty, but innovations in materials now permit head sizes 36 mm or larger. Stability and wear of primary total hip arthroplasty are related to the diameter and material of the femoral head. Larger diameter femoral heads are associated with increased joint stability through increases in arc range of motion and excursion distance prior to dislocation. Fixation of the acetabular component may be related to the size of the femoral head, with increased frictional torque associated with large diameter heads and certain polyethylene. Linear wear of highly crosslinked polyethylenes seems unrelated to femoral head diameter, but larger heads have been reported to have higher volumetric wear. Mechanically assisted crevice corrosion at the connection between the modular femoral head and neck may be associated with the femoral head size and material. Cobalt chromium alloy, alumina ceramic composite, or oxidised zirconium femoral heads on highly crosslinked polyethylene are the most commonly used bearing surfaces, but each may have unique risks and benefits. Conclusions. At present, there is a wave of enthusiasm for the routine use of “large” (32, 36 mm, or larger) femoral heads with highly crosslinked polyethylene for the vast majority of patients having a primary THA. It may be reasonable to consider the “graduated femoral head-outer acetabular diameter system”, using 28 mm femoral heads with “smaller” acetabular components (<50 mm), 32 mm femoral heads with acetabular components 50 – 56 mm outer diameter, and 36 mm or larger femoral heads with acetabular components 58 mm or larger in diameter, to minimise both the risk of dislocation and the frictional torque. Although the linear wear of highly crosslinked polyethylene appears to be independent of head size, the reported increase in volumetric wear with large femoral heads and highly crosslinked polyethylene requires further study, and should temper the use of femoral heads 36 mm or larger in younger and more active patients. With its long and successful history, it is difficult to recommend the complete abandonment of the cobalt chromium alloy femoral head in all patients having a primary THA. Alumina ceramic or oxidised zirconium heads may be considered for younger, heavier, and more active patients, who seem to have the highest risk of trunnion corrosion. Surgeons and patients should be aware of the unique possible complications of these two newer femoral head materials

Lewinnek's safe zone recommendation to minimise dislocations was a target of 5–25° for anteversion angle and 30–50° for inclination angle. Subsequently, it was demonstrated that mal-positioning of the acetabular cup can also lead to edge loading, liner fracture, and greater conventional polyethylene wear. The purpose of this study was to measure the effect of acetabular cup position on highly crosslinked polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty (THA) at long-term follow-up. We identified all patients that underwent primary THA with a minimum of 10 years follow-up using an institutional database in London, Ontario, Canada. Patients with a single implant design consisting of a 28 mm cobalt chromium head and highly crosslinked polyethylene liner (ram extruded, GUR 1050, 100 kGy gamma irradiated, remelted, ethylene oxide sterilised) were selected for inclusion. In total, 85 hips from 79 recruited patients were analysed. Patients underwent a supine radiostereometric analysis (RSA) exam in which the x-ray sources and detectors were positioned to obtain an anterior-posterior and cross-table lateral radiograph. Acetabular cup anteversion angle, inclination angle, and 3D penetration rate (including wear and creep) were measured from the stereo radiograph pairs. At a mean follow-up of 13 years (range, 10–17 years) the mean penetration rate was 0.059 mm/year (95% CI: 0.045 to 0.073 mm/year). Mean anteversion angle was 18.2° (range, −14 to 40°) and mean inclination angle was 43.6° (range, 27 to 61°). With respect to the Lewinnek safe zone, 67% hips met the target for anteversion angle, 77% met the target for inclination angle, and 51% met the target for both. There was no correlation between anteversion angle and penetration rate (r = −0.14, p = 0.72) or between inclination angle and penetration rate (r = 0.11, p = 0.35). There was also no difference (p = 0.07) in penetration rate between hips located within the Lewinnek safe zone for both anteversion angle and inclination angle (mean 0.057 mm/year, 95% CI: 0.036 to 0.079 mm/year) and those outside the safe zone (mean 0.062 mm/year, 95% CI: 0.042 to 0.083 mm/year). Acetabular cup position had no effect on the wear rate of highly crosslinked polyethylene at long-term follow-up. Although care should still be taken to correctly position the acetabular cup for stability, highly crosslinked polyethylene is a forgiving bearing material that can withstand a wide range of cup positions without negatively impacting longevity due to wear

Wear of the tibial polyethylene liner of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is complex and multifactorial. The issues involved include those of implant design and locking mechanism, surgical-technical variability, and patient weight and activity level. However, tibial polyethylene fabrication, including bar stock, amount of irradiation, quenching of free radicals, and sterilization may also be factors in the long-term survival of TKA. Highly crosslinked polyethylene is now widely used in total hip arthroplasty, but its value and use in TKA is a subject of great controversy. In making a decision to use these products, the surgeon should consider multiple sources of evidence: in-vitro wear testing; clinical cohort studies; randomised controlled trials; registry survival data; and retrieval analyses. The two questions to be asked are: is there a value or benefit in the use of these new polyethylenes, and what are the risks involved with the use of these products?. Laboratory testing, generally to 5 million cycles, has shown a significant decrease in tibial polyethylene wear of several products, with both cruciate-retaining and substituting designs, and under adverse conditions. Retrospective cohort studies and RCTs comparing conventional and highly crosslinked polyethylene have shown little difference between the two products at mean follow-up times of 5 years. One registry study showed no difference in the rate of revision at short-term follow-up, but the Australian Joint Replacement Registry in 2014 did report a decreased rate of revision for loosening and osteolysis in “young patients” with one particular tibial polyethylene. The risks of the use of highly crosslinked polyethylene include fracture (the tibial liner, PS post, and patella pegs), and particle size-reactivity. However, these risks appear to be quite low. Retrieval data shows lower damage scores with certain polyethylenes, and variable changes in the oxidation score. At present, the data does not support the widespread or routine use of highly crosslinked or antioxidant polyethylene in TKA. However, consideration should be given for use of certain products in young and active patients. Longer-term follow-up will ultimately determine the role of highly crosslinked polyethylene in TKA

Only a little over a decade ago the vast majority of primary total hip replacements performed in North America, and indeed globally, employed a conventional polyethylene insert, either in a modular version or in a cemented application. Beginning in the early 2000's there was an explosion in technology and options available for the bearing choice in total hip arthroplasty. Highly crosslinked polyethylene was introduced in 1998, and within a few short years the vast majority of polyethylene inserts performed in North America were manufactured from this material. Globally there was a mixed picture with variable market penetration. Surgeons had seen historically poor results with attempts at “improving” polyethylene in the past and many were hesitant to use this new technology. Many randomised clinical trials have been performed and all have shown to a greater or lesser degree, that indeed the highly crosslinked polyethylene insert has undergone less linear and volumetric wear than its more conventional counterpart. The challenge, however, is as we approached mid-term results, orthopaedic manufacturers began altering the polyethylene to improve wear and improve mechanical strength. Therefore while ten-year and greater data will ultimately be published, the actual polyethylene in use at that time will be a different material. Additionally while wear rates are undoubtedly lower, we are still waiting for long-term results of actual osteolytic lesion development and the effect that highly crosslinked polyethylene will have on this clinical scenario. That being said, with over a decade of clinical experience, unquestionably highly crosslinked polyethylene has truly been a revolution in design, essentially eliminating polyethylene wear as an early failure mode. During this same decade metal-on-metal implants had seen a significant resurgence in use. Metal-on-metal implants had in-vitro advantages with very low wear rates. They allowed the use of large metal heads and articulations, thereby improving range of motion and stability. Concerns always existed regarding the production of metal ions and the potential for metal hypersensitivity, as well as possible systemic effects. Metal hypersensitivity remains a diagnosis of exclusion with no definitive diagnostic tests to either screen for it, or diagnose it, if suspected. Over the past few years metal-on-metal implant use has dropped significantly, to the point now in 2013, where the only remaining application is resurfacing implants in the younger male patient. Ceramic-on-ceramic bearings enjoy the lowest wear rates of all currently available hip articulations. Historically there has been concern regarding fracturing of both the inserts and the heads, although current generation ceramic-on-ceramic bearings have a much lower reported fracture rate. The phenomenon of a squeaking articulation remains a concern for both patient and surgeon. Conflicting reports exist on whether this is related to implant malposition or is a function of the bearing itself. As with other bearings, improvements in technology continue to evolve and newer ceramics have recently been introduced and are in clinical practice. The future will continue to see the evolution of the articulation in total hip arthroplasty. Patients are undergoing total hip replacements at younger ages and clearly have higher demands than seen historically. That being said, two factors will have a major influence on future developments. The tremendous clinical success of highly crosslinked polyethylene should have us all question the need for significant changes in bearing material and the current environment following the multiple issues with metal-on-metal is one of evolutionary, rather than revolutionary, design and introduction

The selection of an acetabular component for primary hip arthroplasty has narrowed significantly over the past 10 years. Although monoblock components demonstrated excellent long-term success the difficulty with insertion and failure to fully appreciate full coaptation of contact with the acetabular floor has led to almost complete elimination of its utilization. Modular acetabular components usually with titanium shells and highly crosslinked polyethylene are by far the most utilised today. This is particularly true with mid-term results demonstrating excellent wear rates and extremely low failure rates and the concern of possible mechanical failure of highly crosslinked polyethylene not being a clinical problem. Ceramic liners are also used but problems with squeaking articulations and liner chipping have made highly crosslinked polyethylene the preferred liner material. Metal-on-metal except in surface replacement arthroplasty is rarely used in primary hip arthroplasty. With instability in total hip replacement still being a significant and the leading cause of revision hip replacement the dual mobility articulation has emerged as an increasingly used acetabular component. This is composed of either a monoblock cobalt chrome socket articulating with a large polyethylene liner into which the femoral head is constrained. The polyethylene liner becomes essentially a larger femoral head articulation and hip stability is significantly improved. A modular dual mobility can also be utilised with a titanium shell and a cobalt chrome liner inserted into the shell and then a dual mobility articulation. In a recent series of 182 dual mobility cups, all monoblock ADM, in high risk patients undergoing primary total hip replacement there was 1 interprosthetic dislocation which occurred during reduction of a dislocation. Average follow up was 4.4 years with a range of 2–6.6 years

During the past five years, much research has focused on the effects of sterilisation on UHMWPE wear and mechanical properties. Gamma irradiation sterilisation of UHMWPE causes polymer chain scission and oxidation, which adversely affects both wear and mechanical properties. However, gamma irradiation can also produce crosslinking of the polymer chains, which improves wear resistance. Enhanced polyethylenes or highly crosslinked polyethylenes have been developed to further improve the wear resistance of the material. Highly crosslinked polyethylenes demonstrate markedly improved wear behaviour in hip simulator studies, but they also have a decrease in mechanical properties (yield strength, ultimate tensile strength, and fatigue strength). In a highly conforming joint such as the hip where contact stresses are relatively low due to the large surface area of contact, surface wear mechanisms (abrasion and adhesion) predominate while in a less conforming joint such as a fixed bearing knee replacement, where contact stresses are high, fatigue wear mechanisms occur more typically (delamination and pitting). Modifications to improve the wear resistance of UHMWPE such as the highly crosslinked materials may therefore be more appropriate for hip replacements than for fixed bearing knee replacements. Gravimetric wear measurements of UHMWPE from hip simulators have been used to predict in vivo behaviour of new materials. However, UHMWPE implants absorb fluid so that measurements of weight loss from wear simulators must be corrected with use of fluid soaked control specimens. There are still some inaccuracies in this technique leading to negative reported wear rates for some highly crosslinked polyethylenes. The biologic response to particulate debris may be more dependent on the size and number of particles rather than the volume of debris generated. The average particle size appears to decrease with greater amounts of crosslinking suggesting that for some highly crosslinked polyethylenes the number of particles may be greater than for non-crosslinked polyethylene, even though the volume of wear debris is decreased. Previous efforts to improve the wear behaviour of polyethylene such as the addition of carbon fibres (carbon reinforced polyethylene), hot isostatic pressing (Hylamer), and heat pressing have not demonstrated improvements in vivo. While current joint simulator studies may predict in vivo wear behaviour, clinical studies will ultimately be necessary to determine if highly crosslinked polyethylenes enhance the longevity of total joint arthroplasty

Contemporary polyethylene liners for total hip replacements were introduced in the late 1990's to address osteolysis associated with wear of conventional polyethylene. Every major device manufacturer introduced an “enhanced polyethylene”. In the ensuing decade plus, every major arthroplasty meeting had presentations and debates about the wear resistance and mechanical properties of these new polymers. The results have been remarkable and now with 17 to 18 years of use in patients, we have yet to see clinically significant osteolysis in our patients regardless age or activity level. The results can be summarised as follows: All currently commercially available highly crosslinked polyethylenes produced by major device companies have demonstrated a reduction in wear and osteolysis. At the 2016 Closed Meeting of The Hip Society, none of the surgeons attending had seen a clinically significant case of osteolysis associated with highly crosslinked polyethylene. Registry data demonstrates the superiority of the highly crosslinked materials over conventional polyethylenes. Historical concerns over a reduction in mechanical properties have not been borne out in clinical studies. Although highly crosslinked polyethylene liner fractures have been reported, they are rare and probably related to specific designs or surgical technique issues. It is important to remember that there were rare cases of fracture of conventional polyethylene as well. With currently reported wear rates of the enhanced polyethylenes, polyethylene thickness is unlikely to be a factor in long-term durability with well-designed sockets. Bench data has demonstrated that polyethylene thickness is not a risk factor for wear or fracture if well supported by the metal shell. Thin unsupported polyethylene is at risk for fracture. Although the new anti-oxidant polyethylenes (eg. Vitamin E) have performed well in wear studies, there is no clinically available evidence to support their use based on enhanced fracture toughness

Summary: Highly crosslinked polyethylenes have now been in use for more than 5 years clinically. To date, clinical studies have supported the in vitro studies demonstrating a statically significant reduction in wear. There remains some ongoing concerns as it relates to the mechanical properties of the polyethylene which may limit its use in certain situations. In general unsupported polyethylene should be avoided as there is a risk for fracture regardless of whether the material is highly crosslinked or not. Abstract: Highly crosslinked polyethylenes have been developed by several manufacturers and have been released to the market. In vitro studies have demonstrated several important factors. First, there is a relationship between radiation dose and wear reduction. As the radiation dose increases, the wear of the material decreases. This begins to plateau at approximately 10 mrads rounds of radiation. Secondly, studies that are available suggest that highly crosslinked polyethylenes are relatively insensitive to femoral head size. This potentially allows the surgeon to use large femoral heads increasing hip stability and reducing postoperative dissipation while at the same time not comprising wear. Thirdly, radiation negatively affects the mechanical properties of the material. However, it is important to remember that all materials implanted meets industry guidelines for polyethylene and its mechanical properties. There have been several clinical studies looking at different highly crosslinked polyethylenes. It’s important to remember that these materials are manufactured using different techniques and may perform differently over time. Thus, ongoing studies evaluating the different products that have been released to the market are important and need to be continued as it’s quite possible that all materials may not behave the same. The good news is that to date, all clinical studies have demonstrated statically significant improvement in wear over a relatively short time period. There have been some fractures of polyethylene liners. Analysis of these cases suggests that these fractures are more related to implant position and loading of unsupported polyethylene than they are related to the mechanical properties of the material

Only a little over a decade ago the vast majority of primary total hip replacements performed in North America, and indeed globally, employed a conventional polyethylene insert, either in a modular version or in a cemented application. Beginning in the early 2000's there was an explosion in technology and options available for the bearing choice in total hip arthroplasty. Highly crosslinked polyethylene was introduced in 1998, and within a few short years the vast majority of polyethylene inserts performed in North America were manufactured from this material. Globally there was a mixed picture with variable market penetration. Surgeons had seen historically poor results with attempts at “improving” polyethylene in the past and many were hesitant to use this new technology. Many randomised clinical trials have been performed and all have shown to a greater or lesser degree, that indeed the highly crosslinked polyethylene insert has undergone less linear and volumetric wear than its more conventional counterpart. This replicates well the hip simulator data. The challenge, however, is as we approached mid-term results, orthopaedic manufacturers began altering the polyethylene to improve wear and improve mechanical strength. Therefore while 10-year and greater data will ultimately be published, the actual polyethylene in use at that time will be a different material. Additionally, while wear rates are undoubtedly lower, we are still waiting for long-term results of actual osteolytic lesion development and the effect that highly cross-linked polyethylene will have on this clinical scenario. That being said, with over a decade of clinical experience, unquestionably highly crosslinked polyethylene has truly been a revolution in design, essentially eliminating polyethylene wear as an early failure mode. The question still remains as to the best material for the femoral ball. Essentially two options exist – cobalt chrome and ceramic (Delta). There are theoretically advantages to ceramic heads; however they come at a cost premium: 1.) To date there have been no published reports that demonstrate any improved clinical outcomes with the use of ceramic heads. In fact, the Australian registry demonstrates that the cumulative revision rate is lowest with CoCr heads (at 10 years, 4.3% with CoCr on XLPE and 4.6% with ceramic on XLPE). 2.) Costs continue to be significantly higher for ceramic heads. A price premium of 2–4× higher cost for ceramic over CoCr heads exists in most global markets. 3.) Trunion issues. An emerging concern is corrosion at the head neck junction in THA. Ceramic heads should theoretically have a lower incidence of taper corrosion. To date this is unproven, as is the actual incidence of this as a significant clinical problem

Recently, highly crosslinked polyethylenes have emerged as an alternative bearing surface with tremendous potential for clinical success. However, the term highly cross-linked polyethylene refers to a great many materials, each manufactured under drastically different processing parameters, such as type of irradiation, dose, and warm versus cold state. It has been widely shown in laboratory hip simulator testing, that the wear resistance of UHMWPE improves significantly with increasing cross-link density, but the measurement of this parameter is somewhat controversial. While both swell testing of the polyethylene (direct) and trans-vinylene content (indirect) both yield information regarding the actual degree to which the material is crosslinked, no study to date has examined the exact relationship between these two tests. In evaluating the clinical performance of highly crosslinked polyethylenes, it is crucial that they be characterized according to the specific parameters by which they were manufactured. onship. Micro-Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) and swelling measurements were performed on samples irradiated by either electron beam or gamma sources at varying doses, in both the cold and warm state. The trans-vinylene content was obtained from the ratio of the peaks at 965 cm-1 and 2022 cm-1, while the crosslink density was computed from Flory network theory. The information for crosslink density was plotted versus trans-vinylene content to obtain the precise relationship between these two highly sensitive tests. This information can be used to aid in the clinical evaluation of commercially available highly crosslinked polyethylenes, and to improve our understanding of the very complex relationship between wear and the physical and chemical properties of UHMWPE

We investigated the revision rates of primary total hip replacement (THR) reported in the National Joint Registry (NJR) by types of bearing surfaces used. We analysed THR procedures across all orthopaedic units in England and Wales. Our analyses estimated all-cause and cause-specific revision rates. We identified primary THRs with heads and monobloc cups or modular acetabular component THRs with head and shell/liner combinations. We used flexible parametric survival models to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HR). A total of 1,026,481 primary THRs performed between 2003–2019 are included in the primary analysis (Monobloc: n=378,979 and Modular: n=647,502) with 20,869 (2%) of these primary THRs subsequently undergoing a revision episode (Monobloc: n=7,381 and Modular: n=13,488). Compared to implants with a cobalt chrome head and highly crosslinked polyethylene (HCLPE) cup, the all-cause risk of revision for monobloc acetabular implant was higher for patients with cobalt chrome or stainless steel head and non-HCLPE cup. The risk of revision was lower for patients with a delta ceramic head and HCLPE cup implant, at any post-operative period. Compared to patients with a cobalt chrome head and HCLPE liner primary THR, the all-cause risk of revision for modular acetabular implant varied non-constantly. THRs with a delta ceramic or oxidised zirconium head and HCLPE liner had a lower risk of revision throughout the entire post-operative period. The all-cause and indication-specific risk of prosthesis revision, at different time points following the initial implantation, is lower for implants with a delta ceramic or oxidised zirconium head and a HCLPE liner/cup than commonly used alternatives such as cobalt chrome heads and HCLPE liner/cup

Abstract. Introduction. The Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement's (OUKR's) fully-congruent design minimises polyethylene wear. Consequently, wear is a rare failure mechanism. Phase-3 OUKR linear wear at 5 years was higher than previous OUKR phases, but very low compared to fixed-bearing UKRs. This study aimed to measure OUKR bearing wear at 10 years and investigate factors that may affect wear. Methodology. Bearing thickness for 39 OUKRs from a randomised study was calculated using radiostereometric analysis at regular intervals up to 10 years. Data for 39 and 29 OUKRs was available at 5 and 10 years, respectively. As creep occurs early, wear rate was calculated using linear regression between 6 months and 10 years. Relationships between wear and patient factors, fixation method, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), bearing position, and component position were analysed. Results. The mean wear rate was 0.06mm/year. Fixation method, age, OKS, component size, and bearing size had no correlation with wear. A higher BMI was associated with lower wear (p=0.01). Bearings more than 4mm from the wall had significantly more wear (p=0.04) than those less than 4mm from the wall. There was a linear correlation between the femoral component contact area on the bearing and wear (p=0.04). Conclusions. Phase-3 bearing wear rate is constant, significantly higher than previous OUKR phases at 10 years, and may increase the risk of long-term bearing failure. To minimise complications associated with wear, size 4 bearings should be used in young patients and manufacturing bearings from more durable, highly crosslinked polyethylene should be studied

Hip bearing surfaces materials are typically broadly reported in national registry (metal-on-polyethylene, ceramic-on-ceramic etc). We investigated the revision rates of primary total hip replacement (THR) reported in the National Joint Registry (NJR) by detailed types of bearing surfaces used. We analysed THR procedures across all orthopaedic units in England and Wales. Our analyses estimated all-cause and cause-specific revision rates. We identified primary THRs with heads and monobloc cups or modular acetabular component THRs with detailed head and shell/liner bearing material combinations. We used flexible parametric survival models to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HR). A total of 1,026,481 primary THRs performed between 2003–2019 were included in the primary analysis (Monobloc cups: n=378,979 and Modular cups: n=647,502) with 20,869 (2%) of these primary THRs subsequently undergoing a revision episode (Monobloc: n=7,381 and Modular: n=13,488). Compared to implants with a cobalt chrome head and highly crosslinked polyethylene (HCLPE) cup, the overall risk of revision for monobloc acetabular implant was higher for patients with cobalt chrome or stainless steel head and non-HCLPE cup. The risk of revision was lower for patients with a delta ceramic head and HCLPE cup implant, at any post-operative period. Compared to patients with a cobalt chrome head and HCLPE liner primary THR, the overall risk of revision for modular acetabular implant varied non-constantly. THRs with a delta ceramic or oxidised zirconium head and HCLPE liner had a lower risk of revision throughout the entire post-operative period. The overall and indication-specific risk of prosthesis revision, at different time points following the initial implantation, is reduced for implants with a delta ceramic or oxidised zirconium head and a HCLPE liner/cup in reference to THRs with a cobalt chrome head and HCLPE liner/cup

Isolated liner exchange with highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXLPE) is an option to address polyethylene wear and osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The liner can be fixed with either the original locking mechanism or cemented into the acetabular cup. Whether the method used for fixation of HXLPE liner has any bearing on the outcomes 10 to 15 years after surgery is still unclear. Data for all patients who had undergone isolated liner exchange surgery with HXLPE in our institution between August 2000 and January 2015 were retrieved. Patients were classified according to the locking mechanism used (original locking mechanism or cemented). Survivorship and revision rates were compared among different subgroups. A total of 86 isolated liner exchanges were performed and patients had a mean duration of follow-up of 13 years (range, 5 to 22). 50 patients had the new liner cemented and the other 36 patients used the original locking mechanism. 20 patients (23.3%) had complications, with dislocation being the most common (7). 10 of them (12.6%) required re-revision surgery. Overall estimated mean survivorship was 19.2 years. There was no significant difference in the re-revision rate between original locking mechanism (11.1%) and cementation (12.0%) for the fixation of HXLPE (p=0.899). Using the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the revision-free survival of HXLPE fixed with original locking mechanism and cementation were 94.1% and 93.2%, respectively, at 10 years, and were 84.7% and 81.3%, respectively, at 20 years (p=0.840). The re-revision rate and the revision-free survival of liner exchange surgery using HXLPE liner were not affected by the fixation technique used. Both cementing a HXLPE liner or using the original locking mechanism were associated with good survivorship at 13 years follow up

INTRODUCTION. Wear and polyethylene damage have been implicated in up to 22% of revision surgeries after unicompartmental knee replacement. Two major design rationales to reduce this rate involve either geometry and/or material strategies. Geometric options involve highly congruent mobile bearings with large contact areas; or moderately conforming fixed bearings to prevent bearing dislocation and reduce back-side wear, while material changes involve use of highly crosslinked polyethylene. This study was designed to determine if a highly crosslinked fixed-bearing design would increase wear resistance. METHODS. Gravimetric wear rates were measured for two unicompartmental implant designs: Oxford unicompartmental (Biomet) and Triathlon X3 PKR (Stryker) on a knee wear simulator (AMTI) using the ISO-recommended standard. The Oxford design had a highly conforming mobile bearing of compression molded Polyethylene (Arcom). The Triathlon PKR had a moderately conforming fixed bearing of sequentially crosslinked Polyethylene (X3). A finite element model of the AMTI wear simulation was constructed to replicate experimental conditions and to compute wear. This approach was validated using experimental results from previous studies. The wear coefficient obtained previously for radiation-sterilized low crosslinked polyethylene was used to predict wear in Oxford components. The wear coefficient obtained for highly crosslinked polyethylene was used to predict wear in Triathlon X3 PKR components. To study the effect design and polyethylene crosslinking, wear rates were computed for each design using both wear coefficients. RESULTS. Wear rates were significantly lower (69%) for the Triathlon fixed-bearing design compared to the Oxford mobile-bearing design (Fig 1, p<0.01). The FEA model predicted 46% of wear occurring at the back side of the mobile bearing (Fig 2). When wear was computed for the Triathlon PKR design using the wear coefficients used for the low crosslinked polyethylene, wear rates increased to 13.9 mg/million cycles. DISCUSSION. We used a combined experimental and computational approach to quantify factors contributing to polyethylene wear after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. To isolate the effect of crosslinking level and mobile-bearing design, we computed wear rates for both designs using the same wear coefficient obtained for low crosslinked polyethylene. Wear rates in the low crosslinked Triathlon PKR insert increased by more than 160% relative to those in the highly crosslinked Triathlon X3 PKR. The finite element method facilitates computation of relative back-side to front-side wear, which is challenging to obtain experimentally. The back-side wear Oxford mobile bearing was 46% of total wear. Major factors contributing to the difference in wear were back-side wear (46%) and increased crosslinking (63%) with the combined effect having an additive effect. Our FEA-predicted wear penetration rates (0.024 mm/million cycles) also compare well to in vivo studies, which reported penetration rates of 0.022 mm/year for Oxford bearings. A validated computer model is extremely valuable for efficient evaluation of wear performance and design development. In summary, increasing conformity to increase contact area and reduce contact stress may not be the sole predictor of wear performance. A highly crosslinked polyethylene insert in a fixed-bearing design may provide the high wear performance of a mobile-bearing design without the increased risk for bearing dislocation

The April 2015 Hip & Pelvis Roundup. 360 . looks at: Goal-directed fluid therapy in hip fracture; Liberal blood transfusion no benefit in the longer term; Repeated measures: increased accuracy or compounded errors?; Peri-acetabular osteotomy safer than perhaps thought?; Obesity and peri-acetabular osteotomy: poor bedfellows; Stress fracture in peri-acetabular osteotomy; Infection and tantalum implants; Highly crosslinked polyethylene really does work

Introduction. The first highly crosslinked and melted polyethylene acetabular component for use in total hip arthroplasty was implanted in 1998 and femoral heads larger than 32mm in diameter introduced 2004. The purpose of this study was to re-assemble a previous multi-center patient cohort in order to evaluate the radiographic and wear analysis of patients receiving this form of highly crosslinked polyethylene articulating against large diameter femoral heads at a minimum of 10 years follow-up. Methods. Two centers contributed patients to this ongoing clinical study. Inclusion criteria for patients was: primary THR; femoral heads greater than 32mm; minimum 10 year follow-up. 69 hips have been enrolled with an average follow-up of 11.2 years (10–15), 32 females (50%). Wear analysis was performed using the Martell Hip Analysis software. Radiographic grading was performed on the longest follow-up AP hip films. The extent of radiolucency in each zone greater than 0.5mm in thickness was recorded along with the presence of sclerotic lines and osteolysis. Results. Wear analysis: Using the average of the slopes of the individual regression lines, the wear rate was 0.004±0.094mm/yr. Using the early to latest film method, the wear rate was 0.035±0.076mm/yr. Radiographic analysis: Acetabular side: the greatest incidence of radiolucency occurred in zone 1 at 27%; sclerotic lines had a less than 2% incidence in any of the 3 zones; there was no identified osteolysis. Femoral side: the highest incidence of radiolucencies was in zones 1 and 3, 7% and 4%; sclerotic lines were rare in any zone, maximum in zone 3, 4%; there was no identified osteolysis. Conclusion. The wear of this form of irradiated and melted highly crosslinked polyethylene remained at levels lower than the detection limit of the software at minimum 10 year follow-up and there was no identified osteolysis