Growing prostheses have been utilised in the United Kingdom since the late 1970s. Various mechanisms have been tried, but to date all have required some form of surgical intervention. This has led to multiple hospital admissions and a large amount of resources, both in theatre time and rehabilitation. Over the last ten years the Department of Bio-Medical Engineering at University College, London, together with the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, have developed a prosthesis which does not require surgical intervention to elongate. The total cost of the development has been something in the order of £350,000.00. The design features are the power worm screw mechanism where one turn equals 1 mm of elongation, but attached to this mechanism is an epicyclic gearbox, which has been reduced in size so that it can fit in to the body of the prosthesis. The speed reduction achieved by the gear box is 13061 to 1. The mechanism is capable of withstanding an axial load of 1,350 newtons. When an external magnetic field is applied an external coil speed of 3,000 revs per minute leads to a lengthening of 0.23 mm per minute. To date the prosthesis has been inserted in three patients ages 11, 12 and 13. All were suffering from osteosarcoma of the distal femur and had previously received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Early elongation had been achieved in all patients without any major discomfort and without the need for either analgesia or inpatient admission. There had been no loss of range of movement in the early post-lengthening period. This new prosthesis represents a significant advance in the management of skeletal sarcomas in children.
Complications developed in seven patients: two implants failed requiring revision, one peri-prosthetic fracture occurred, one developed a flexion deformity of 25 degrees at the knee joint, which was subsequently overcome and three died of disseminated disease.
Introduction. Historically, amputation or rotationplasty were the treatment of choice in skeletally immature patients. The introduction of expandable endoprostheses in the late 1980s offered the advantages of limb-salvage and limb length equality at skeletal maturity and a promising alternative with improved cosmetic results and immediate weight bearing. Objective. to describe the Rizzoli experience in reconstruction with three different types of expandable prostheses in growing children with malignant bone tumors of the femur, assess the outcome of limb salvage in these patients, analyze survival and complications related to these prostheses used over time. Materials and Methods. Between 1996 and 2010, 39 expandable implants were used in 32 children (16 boys and 16 girls; mean age, 9 years at initial surgery) with bone sarcomas of the femur treated with limb salvage using expandable prostheses. The most common diagnosis was osteoblastic osteosarcoma; all children were classified as having a stage IIB lesion and had preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy. The minimally invasive Kotz
The August 2013 Children’s orthopaedics Roundup360 looks at: a multilevel approach to equinus gait; whether screening leads to needless intervention; salvage of subcapital slipped epiphysis; growing prostheses for children’s oncology; flexible nailing revisited; ultrasound and the pink pulseless hand; and slipping forearm fractures.